Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2010 Four Commonly Confused Hairstreaks (Lycaenidae, Theclinae, Eumaeini): Three Need Names, One Does Not
Robert K. Robbins
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The taxonomy of four relatively common Neotropical eumaeine hairstreak species has been confused. Newly described are Iaspis andersoni Robbins, new species, differentiated from I. talayra (Hewitson), I. castitas (Druce), and I. exiguus (Druce); Michaelus joseph Robbins, new species, differentiated from M. ira (Hewitson); and Ignata caldas Robbins, new species, differentiated from I. gadira (Hewitson). Iaspis andersoni is unnamed because of a taxonomic misidentification made more than a century ago. The latter two are undescribed because the types of M. ira and I. gadira are not the species that they had been thought to be. Populations in the Arawacus togarna (Hewitson) species complex from Mexico and Costa Rica have been treated as two distinct species, but new data on geographical variation of wing pattern and male genitalia suggests that this classification is incorrect. A lectotype for Thecla exiguus Druce, 1907 is designated because taxonomy of the Iaspis talayra group in the Amazon Region is unresolved. A lectotype for Thecla togarna Hewitson, 1867 is designated because an incorrect type locality has engendered confusion.

More than 20% of the approximately 1,100 known species of Neotropical Eumaeini (Lyeaenidae: Theclinae) are undescribed (Robbins 2004b). Most are exceedingly rare in museum collections, of which some recently described species are representative (Bálint 2003; Nicolay & Robbins 2005; Robbins & Duarte 2005; Hall & Willmott 2005; Hall et al. 2005; Robbins & Busby 2008a, b). This rarity makes it difficult to assess intra- and inter-speeifie variation, which, in turn, makes it difficult to show that they are distinct under a biological species concept. However, a few relatively common and widespread eumaeine species lack names because two species were lumped under one name or because a type specimen was a different species than it had been thought to be (Robbins 2004a, b). In this paper, I describe three such species. Finally, new data on geographical variation show that a common, putatively unnamed species is a geographical variant of a species with a name. This variation is documented.

Materials and Methods

Genitalic dissections were made following standard techniques (Robbins 1991), and the number of dissections examined for each species is noted. Genitalic terms follow those in Klots (1970), as modified for the Eumaeini by Robbins (1991). Androconial terminology follows Robbins (1991). Wing vein terminology follows Comstock (1918). Snodgrass (1935) is used as a reference for other morphological structures.

Taxonomic decisions were based upon an analysis of morhological variation (the number of specimens examined is stated in each description) in the museum and private collections noted below. A diagnosis and the reasons for the generic placement of each taxon are presented. Also, the reasons for considering each of the newly available names distinct under a biological species concept are given. The history of each species name is supplemented with new information, where relevant. Males and females were associated by their similar geographic distributions and by their ventral wing patterns, which are barely sexually dimorphic for the species treated in this paper (Figs. 1–13). All species discussed in this paper belong to the Eumaeini as characterized by Eliot (1973).

Brackets are used for information not explicitly noted on holotype labels and for description of holotype labels. All labels on holotypes are printed unless noted otherwise. Months are abbreviated by their first three letters in English. Forewing length of the type series for each new name was measured with a vernier caliper and reported as a mean, standard deviation, and sample size.

Acronyms for the collections from which data are cited are as follows: (AA) Annette Aiello Collection, Ancón, Panamá; (BMNH) Natural History Museum, London, UK; (CMNH) Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; (FIOC) Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; (JHKW) Jason Hall and Keith Willmott Collection, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA; (MIZA) Museo del Instituto de Zoología Agrícola, Maracay, Venezuela; (NMCR) Museo Nacional de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica; (USNM) National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.

Taxonomic Results and Discussion

Iaspis andersoni Robbins new species

  • History. Hewitson (1868) named Thecla talayra from a Rio de Janeiro male (Fig. 1). The type has a distinctive off-white underside ground color and lacks an orange-red spot distal of the postmedian line in cell Cu2-2A (arrow in Fig. 1). This male also possesses a scent pad at the anterior-distal end of the discal cell that is covered with iridescent blue scales and that is bordered anteriorly at vein R3 (the same as that illustrated in Fig. 15).

  • Despite these distinctive characters, the taxonomy of T. talayra is confused because of decisions made more than a century ago. Godman & Sal vin (1887–1901) noted that T. talayra is a common species in Central America (Figs. 4–5), but differed slightly from the one Brazilian female in their possession, which had a “yellow patch at the anal angle”. This description does not match the orange-red spot at the anal angle of the type of T. talayra (Fig. 1) and was probably another species. Druce (1907) described Thecla castitas as a variety of T. talayra from Para and Espiritu (sic) Santo, Brazil and stated that it has “a very different appearance below” and maybe a distinct species (Fig. 2). Druce (1907) also described Thecla exiguus from Surinam (Fig. 3). This species has a wing pattern that is similar to that of T. castitas, but Druce presented no evidence why T. castitas—and not T. exiguus—was a geographical form of T. talayra.

  • Draudt (1919–1920) followed Druce, treating Thecla talayra Hewitson as a lowland species that occurs from Mexico to southern Brazil, with T. castitas as a geographical form and T. exiguus as a distinct species. Most of these names were transferred to Iaspis (Johnson 1991), but D'Abrera (1995) basically followed the classification in Draudt. Austin & Johnson (1996) divided Iaspis into “groups”, including the I. talayra group, based on the size of the dorsal forewing scent pad, but no measurements or precise morphological details were presented to support this action. They also described Iaspis ornata, I. minuta, I. ambiguanota, I. fumosa, and I. sinenota in the I. talayra group from Rondônia (Brazil). Robbins (2004a, b) provisionally synonymized the last four names with I. castitas because the interspecific differences reported by Austin & Johnson (1996) were less than previous assessments of intraspecific eumaeine variation (J. Brown 1983; Robbins 1990).

  • In sum, the name Iaspis talayra represents a distinct wing pattern phenotype (Fig. 1) with little variation in the Atlantic Region, as demarcated by K. Brown (1982). This phenotype has an off-white ground color ventrally and lacks an orange-red spot distal of the postmedian line in cell CU1-Cu2. The names Iaspis castitas and I. exiguus represent a variety of wing pattern phenotypes in the Amazonian Region (including the Orinoco and neighboring drainages, sensu K. Brown 1982). All differ from I. talayra in possessing a gray ground color ventrally and an orange-red spot on the distal edge of the postmedian line in cell Cu2-2A (Figs. 2–3). The dorsal forewing wing pattern, including structure of the scent pad, appears to be the same as I. talayra. The number of species in the I. talayra species group in the Amazon Region is yet an open question. Finally, there is a distinct wing pattern phenotype from northern Colombia to Mexico that does not have a name (Figs. 4–5).

  • Diagnosis. The blue dorsal color of males (Fig. 4 top) of I. andersoni is perhaps the most diagnostic character, being consistently more brilliant in the study series than that of I. talayra, I. castitas, or I. exiguus (Figs. 1–3 top). Additionally, this Central American phenotype has a more silver ventral ground color than these species. Finally, there is a pair of terminal “spines” (Fig. 19) at the lateral edges of the penis tip in I. andersoni that is lacking in I. castitas, but a larger study series may show this trait to be variable intraspecifically.

  • Size. Mean male forewing length = 1.2 cm, sd = 0.09, n = 6. Mean female forewing length = 1.1 cm, sd = 0.10, n = 3.

  • Reasons for recognizing it as a distinct biological species. Throughout its range from Mexico to northern Colombia (Fig. 30), the wing pattern of male I. andersoni varies little and is always distinct from the wing patterns of male I. castitas and I. exiguus in South America. The range of I. andersoni is not known to overlap the ranges of the Amazonian “phenotypes” in the I. talayra species group (as listed in Austin & Johnson 1996). If sympatry with an Amazonian “phenotype” were discovered, it would be necessary to determine whether distinguishing characters intergrade.

  • Generic placement. The placement of I. andersoni in Iaspis is based on three characters. First, a membranous “duet” connects the anterior end of the female genitalia ductus bursae where the ductus seminalis arises and the posterior end of the corpus bursae in Iaspis (Figs. 21–22), a structure that is unreported in other eumaeine genera. Second, a red spot on the distal edge of the postmedian line in cell Cu2—2A on the ventral hindwing (Figs. 2–5) occurs in some Iaspis (including I. andersoni) and the Lamprospihis Section of the Eumaeini (especially Calycopis Seudder). Iaspis lacks the synapomorphies of the Lamprospihis Section (Duarte & Robbins, in prep.), for which reason the red spot is presumed to be independently derived in Iaspis. Third, the male genitalia of Iaspis vary little interspecifically (Figs. 19–20), but the squat valvae and overall structure are distinctive (Austin & Johnson 1996). A pair of small terminal spines on the lateral penis tip occurs only in some Iaspis, including I. andersoni (Fig. 19).

  • Nomenclature. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1967) settled confusion about the type species of Iaspis Kaye. Johnson (1991) designated a lectotype for Thecla talayra Hewitson (Fig. 1). Austin & Johnson (1996) designated a lectotype for Thecla castitas Druce (Fig. 2). Because the taxonomy of the Amazon Basin phenotypes is unresolved, as noted, I designate a male lectotype for Thecla exiguus Druce (Fig. 3) for the purpose of stabilizing the name. The lectotype is deposited in the BMNH and has the following labels: a round red type label, a white label “B.M. No. Rh 630”, and a green locality label “Surinam ex coll. Fruhstorfer”.

  • Holotype 3 (Fig. 4). [white label, the day is handwritten in black ink] PANAMA: Canal Zone, Summit [Cacao Plantation Road], 1 IV[Apr] 1979. leg. R. Robbins, [white label] R. K. Robbins Collection, [red label] HOLOTYPE Iaspis andersoni Robbins. Deposited USNM.

  • Paratypes (5♂ & 3♀). Panamá, Canal Zone (now Canal Area): 2♂ & IV Summit, 29 Mar 1979 leg. R. Robbins, 1 Apr 1979 leg. R. Robbins, 24 Mar 1964 leg. G.B. Small. 23 La Pita, 1 Jun 1963 leg. G. B. Small, 16 Apr 1963 leg. G. B. Small. Panama Province: 1♂ & 2♀ Cerro Campana 15 Dec 1963 leg. G. B. Small, 26 Jan 1966, leg. S. S. Nicolay. 23 Dec 1963 2000′, leg. G. B. Small. All deposited USNM.

  • Type locality. Cacao Plantation Road in 1979 was a dirt road through late secondary lowland forest that was used for dry season training exercises by the United States and Panamá military. Ridgely (1976) discussed Cacao Plantation Road in the section on “Summit Gardens and Vicinity”, referring to it as the road that is “about a mile beyond Summit Gardens (toward Gamboa)”. In 2000, Cacao Plantation Road was a narrow, overgrown dirt path that was called a nature trail.

  • Etymology. This species is named in honor of Commander Richard A. Anderson, whose collecting greatly increased our knowledge of the Nicaraguan and Panamanian butterfly faunas, especially Lyeaenidae and Hesperiidae. It is a noun in the genitive case of masculine gender.

  • Habitat. Iaspis andersoni is common in moderately disturbed wet and dry lowland forest from sea level to 1,100 m elevation.

  • Larval foodplants. Iaspis andersoni appears to be polyphagous, having been reared on a number of different plants. A male (deposited NMCR) was reared from a larva that Isidro Chacón found on 1 Dec 1992 on Souroubea (Maregraviaceae) at Horquetas de Sarapiquí, El Plástico, Heredia, Costa Rica (600 m). Janzen & Hallwachs (2008, adult vouchers in USNM) in the Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Alajuela and Guanacaste Provinces, Costa Rica, reared two males from Inga oerstediana (Fabaceae) (07-SRNP-65853, 08-SRNP-21004), two females from Inga spectabilis (Fabaceae) (07-SRNP-4715, 07-SRNP-4716), and two females from Miconia lacera (Melastomataceae) (07-SRNP-70877, 07-SRNP-70878). A caterpillar of I. andersoni is illustrated (Fig. 14).

  • Distribution (Fig. 30). Mexico to northern Colombia (Rio Magdalena Valley), including Isla Coiba off the west coast of Panamá.

  • Study series. For this paper, I examined 87 males and 16 females of I. andersoni from 7 countries, including genitálic dissections of 2 males and 2 females; 59 males and 23 females in the I. castitas species complex from 7 countries in the Amazon Region, including genitálic dissections of 3 males and 3 females; 10 males and 1 female of the I. talayra from 2 states in Brazil, including 1 male and 1 female genitalic dissection; and the lectotypes of I. talayra, I. exiguus, and I. castitas (BMNH).

  • Michaelus joseph Robbins new species

  • History and new information. Nicolay (1979) described Michaelus and recognized five species including M. ira (Hewitson) and M. vibidia (Hewitson). He illustrated the genitalia and wing pattern of these species and gave their distributions. Although Nicolay correctly recognized that he was treating two biologically distinet sympatric species, Robbins (2004a, b) synonymized these names because the Hewitson types of M. ira (the older name) and M. Vibidia are the same species (Robbins 2004a, b).

  • In sum, the species that Nicolay called M. vibidia should be called M. ira (Robbins 2004b), and the species that Nicolay referred to as M. ira does not have a name and is being described as M. joseph.

  • Diagnosis. Michaelus joseph is the only Michaelus that has red scales at the base of the ventral hindwing (Fig. 17). There is a detailed description of M. joseph under the name M. ira in Nicolay (1979), including excellent genitalic figures. The holotype and a female of M. joseph are illustrated (Figs. 6–7).

  • Size. Mean male fore wing length =1.6 cm, sd = 0.10, n = 6.

  • Reasons for recognizing it as a distinct biological species. Michaelus joseph and M. ira have similar wing patterns, but are sympatric and synchronic throughout the range of M. joseph. For example, they occur at the same time of year in Guanacaste (Costa Rica), the Canal Area (Panamá), Madre de Dios (Peru), and Rondônia (Brazil) (vouchers in USNM). They differ consistently in the structure of the genitalia and wing pattern, as noted by Nicolay (1979). They also differ in the presence of red scales at the base of the ventral hindwing.

  • Generic placement. Nicolay (1979) provided characters for the placement of M. joseph in Michaelus, but a phylogenetic analysis is yet lacking.

  • Nomenclature. Thecla ira Hewitson was described from a presumably single Mexican male in the Saunders Collection. A male in the RMNH is labeled as the holotype of Thecla ira (B.M. type No. Rh 670, Type H.T.). Thecla vibidia Hewitson was described from a presumably single Amazonian male in the Hewitson Collection. A male in the RMNH is labeled as the type of T. vibidia (B.M. type No. Rh 668), and Godman & Salvin (1887–1901: 44) referred to it as the type.

  • Holotype ♂ (Fig. 6). [white label, date handwritten in blue ink] Madden Forest Pre.[serve], Panama, C.[anal] Z.[one], VII[July]-24-[19]69, [leg.] G. B. Small, [red label] HOLOTYPE Michaelus joseph Robbins. Deposited USNM.

  • Paratypes (5♂). Panamá, Canal Area, leg. G. B. Small: Piña, 12 Jan 1965: Madden Dam, Apr 1968: Madden Forest, 19 Jul 1969: Madden Forest, 5 Aug 1968: Panamá Province, Rayano, 16 Nov 1974, G. B. Small. All deposited USNM.

  • Type locality. Ridgely (1976) mapped Madden Forest and described it as a fairly large forest reserve straddling the Continental Divide northeast of Summit Gardens. Unfortunately, much of Madden Forest had been clear-cut by 1980 (pers. obs.). However, larger tracts of forest just to the northwest (Summit to Pipeline Road) are now protected in Soberanía National Park.

  • Etymology. Michaelus joseph is named for Nicolay's grandson Joseph Nicolay. It is an indeclinable noun in apposition of masculine gender.

  • Habitat. Michaelus joseph inhabits lowland forests, ranging from those that lack a dry season to those that are seasonally dry with many deciduous trees. It is a rarer species in collections than M. ira.

  • Larval foodplant. Michaelus joseph has not been reared, but flowers of Bignoniaceae are the expected foodplant. Individuals of M. ira were reared from the fallen flowers of Pithecoctenium and Pyrostegia in the Bignoniaceae in southern Brazil (Zikán & Zikán 1968 under the name Thecla venustula [a nomen nudum], deposited FIOC) and in Panamá (Robbins & Aiello 1982 under the name Thecla vibidia, deposited AA).

  • Distribution (Fig. 31). From Costa Rica to the western Amazon in Peru and Brazil. Nicolay (1979) also recorded specimens from Belize, Venezuela, Colombia, Bolivia, and the central Amazon Basin in Brazil, but I have not seen these specimens.

  • Study series. For this paper I examined 44 males and 9 females of M. joseph from 5 countries, including genitalic dissections of 3 males and 1 female; and 84 males and 33 females of M. ira from 10 countries, including genitalic dissections of 2 males and the genitalic figures in Nicolay (1979). I also examined the holotypes of M. ira and M. vibidia (BMNH) with a binocular microscope.

  • Figs. 1–13.

    Adults, dorsal on top, ventral on bottom except for fig. 13. 1.♂ 3 Iaspis talayra lectotype, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, arrow points to lack of orange-red scales on the distal border of the postmedian line in cell Cu2—2A. 2.♂ I. castitas lectotype, Para, Brazil. 3. ♂ I. exiguus lectotype, Surinam. 4.♂ I. andersoni holotype, Panamá. 5.♀ $ I. andersoni paratype, Panamá. 6.♂ Michaelus joseph holotype, Panamá. 7. ♀ M. joseph, Costa Rica. 8. ♂ Ignata caldas holotype, Panamá. 9.♀ I. caldas paratype, Panamá. 10.♀ Ignata gadira holotype, Guatemala. Arrow on right points to pale gray scales in middle of hindwing. Arrow on left points to black anal lobe spot lacking red scales. 11.3 Thecla togarna original illustration, “Venezuela”. 12.♂ Arawacus togarna lectotype, Mexico. 13.♂ A. togarna ventral, Belize on top, Costa Rica on bottom. Scale 1 cm.

    f01_01.jpg

    Figs. 14–18.

    14. Larva (dorsal aspect) of Iaspis andersoni eating Inga spectabilis (Fabaceae) (Costa Rica, 07-SRNP-4715, image courtesy Janzen & Hallwachs). 15. Dorsal fore win g scent pad (arrow) of Iaspis andersoni (Panamá) with iridescent blue scales. 16. Dorsal hindwing scent patch (arrow) of Arawacus togarna (Costa Rica). 17. Base of the ventral wings of Michaelus joseph (Panamá) with red scales (arrow). 18. Base of the ventral wings of M. ira (Panamá) without red scales (arrow).

    f14_01.jpg

    Figs. 19–20.

    Iaspis male genitalia, ventral aspect of genital capsule and valvae (top), lateral aspect of genital capsule and penis (bottom), posterior to left, scale 0.5 mm. 19. I. andersom (Panamá). Penis tip in dorsal aspect (enlarged) showing terminal “spines” 20. I. castitas (Peru).

    f19_01.jpg

    Figs. 21–22.

    Iaspis ductus copulatrix (female genitalia), ventral aspect, posterior to left, scale 0.5 mm. 21. I. andersoni (Panamá). 22.1. castitas (Peru), arrow points to membranous duct connecting the corpus bursae to the ductus bursae.

    f21_01.jpg

    Ignata caldas Robbins new species

  • History and new information. Hewitson (1867) described the tailless Thecla gadira from a Guatemalan female (Fig. 10). Godman & Sal vin (1887–1901) illustrated a Guatemalan male of T. gadira and named Thecla minthe—another tailless species with a very similar wing pattern—from a Mexican male. This taxonomy was followed in Draudt (1919–1920) and D'Abrera (1995). Both gadira and minthe were transferred to Ignata Johnson (Robbins 2004b), where they were treated as synonyms because their holotypes are the same species. Although Godman & Salvin (1887–1901) correctly realized that there are two species, the less common species, which they called Thecla minthe, is Ignata gadira (Robbins 2004b). The more common and widespread of the two, which Godman and Salvin called Thecla gadira, does not have a name.

  • Diagnosis. The ventral wing pattern of both sexes of I. caldas has a small orange-red spot at the anal angle (occurring without exception in the study series) and no light gray scales in the middle of the hindwing (Figs. 8–9). In both sexes of I. gadira, the anal angle spot is black (as noted by Hewitson 1867) and there are light gray scales in the middle of the hindwings (Fig. 10). Additionally, male dorsal blue color of I. caldas is a darker hue than that of male I. gadira, the scent pad is larger, and the ventral fore wing lacks the iridescent blue sheen of I. gadira (well-illustrated in Godman & Salvin 1887–1901 and D'Abrera 1995 under the names Thecla gadira and Thecla minthe, respectively). Finally, male and female genitalia, including shape of the male 8th tergum, valvae, and ductus bursae differentiate I. caldas from I. gadira (Figs. 23–26).

  • Size. Mean male forewing length = 1.3 cm, sd = 0.10, n = 6. Mean female forewing length = 1.3 cm, sd = 0.11, n = 7.

  • Reasons for recognizing it as a distinct biological species. Ignata caldas and I. gadira differ in wing pattern, androconia, male genitalia, and female genitalia, as noted above. They are sympatric in Nicaragua (Robbins & Anderson submitted) and Panamá (Robbins & Small 1981). Individuals with intermediate character states are unknown in areas of sympatry or allopatry. The results of preliminary phylogenetic analyses indicate that they are phylogenetically distinct species (Robbins unpubl.). Whereas I. gadira is restricted to Central American montane forest (600–1750 m), I. caldas occurs in both lowland and montane forest from Mexico to the upper Amazon Basin.

  • Generic placement. The original description of Ignata (Johnson 1992) included no synapomorphies for the genus, and the genus as described was not monophyletic (Robbins 2004a). Ignata was placed in the Panthiades Section (see Robbins & Duarte 2004 for characters) and provisionally characterized in Robbins (2004b) by the readily recognizable “smooth” blue iridescence on the dorsal wings of males (Fig. 8) and by the wide posterior penis in ventral aspect (Figs. 23–24) that is somewhat flattened in lateral aspect (similar to penis shape in Parrhasius Hübner, Nicolay 1979). Results of an ongoing phylogenetic analysis of Ignata and its relatives may modify the current generic classification of these species.

  • Holotype 3 (Fig. 8). [white label, elevation and date handwritten in black ink] Panama, [Panama Province], Cerro Campana, 1000 ft, 4 Aug 1967, leg. G. B. Small, [red label] HOLOTYPE Ignata caldas Robbins. Deposited USNM.

  • Paratypes (5♂&7♀). Panamá, Cerro Campana, leg. G. B. Small: l♀ 1500 ft, 23 Jan 1965: 2♀ 2000 ft, 23 Dec 1963: 1♀ 2000ft, 4 Jan 1964: 1♀ 2000ft, 5 Jan 1964: 2♂ 2000 ft, 8 Dec 1963: l♀ 2500 ft, 9 Sep 1967. Panamá, Panamá Province, Cerro Campana, leg. R. Robbins, 1♀ 500 m, 23 Feb 1979. Panamá, Chiriqui Province, Potrerillos, 3600 ft, leg. G. B. Small: 2♂ 27 Dec 1965: 1♂ 29 Dec 1965. All paratypes deposited USNM.

  • Type locality. The type locality is remnant forest and scrub vegetation surrounded by pasture along the road from the Pan American Highway to Cerro Campana (further descriptions in Ridgely 1976, Robbins & Small 1981).

  • Etymology. Ignata caldas is named for my wife, insect population ecologist Astrid Caldas, who conducted dissertation research on butterflies at the type locality. It is an indeclinable noun in apposition of feminine gender.

  • Habitat. Ignata caldas occurs in wet and seasonally dry forest from sea level to 1,100 m in Central America and from the Amazon lowlands to 1,900 m on the eastern slope of the Andes.

  • Larval foodplant. Unknown.

  • Distribution (Fig. 32). Ignata caldas ranges from Mexico to southeastern Peru in the Amazon Basin (Rio Madre de Dios drainage). This species undoubtedly occurs in Bolivia and Brazil near the border with Peru.

  • Study series. For this paper I examined 42 males and 31 females from 9 countries of I. caldas, including genitalic dissections of 6 males and 3 females, and 22 males and 11 females from 5 countries of I. gadira, including genitalic dissections of 2 males and 2 females. I also examined the holotypes of I. gadira and I. minthe (BMNH).

  • Figs. 23–24.

    Ignata male genitalia, ventral aspect (top), lateral aspect (bottom), 8th abdominal tergum (right), posterior to left, scale 1 mm. 23. I.caldas (Panamá). 24. I. gadira (Costa Rica).

    f23_01.jpg

    Figs. 25–26.

    Ignata female genitalia, ductus copulatrix (left). 8th abdominal tergum (right), ventral aspect, posterior to left, scale 1 mm. 25. I. caldas (Panamá). 26. I. gadira (Panamá).

    f25_01.jpg

    Arawacus togarna (Hewitson)

  • History and new information. Following Godman & Salvin (1887–1901), Draudt (1919–1920) distinguished Thecla togarna Hewitson with four ventral hindwing brown/black bands from T. linus (Fabricius) with five. He divided the former into geographical “forms” Thecla togarna and Thecla lincoides Draudt.

  • The late H. K. Clench (unpublished manuscript in CMNH) transferred the “four-banded” togarna and lincoides to Arawacus (previously characterized in Clench 1961) and treated them as subspecies of the “five-banded” South American A. aetolus (Sulzer), which is a senior synonym of A. linus (Comstock & Huntington 1961). He further noted that there were two wing pattern forms from Guatemala to Costa Rica on the Atlantic slope of Central America and that both differed from that of A. a. togarna to the north and from that of A. a. lincoides to the south. He planned to name these wing pattern phenotypes as subspecies, but had not yet examined the genitalia of these taxa at the time of his death.

  • Some subspecies of A. aetolus, which Clench had based on wing pattern and androeonial characters, also have distinct genitalia. Because there was no evidence for hybridization at the distribution edges where these putative subspecies meet (with one exception in South America), Robbins (2000) treated them as distinct species. The unnamed wing pattern phenotypes from Guatemala to Costa Rica have distinct male genitalia, for which reason they were noted to be a distinct species (Robbins 2000) and were so treated by Dyer & Gentry (2002), Robbins (2004b), Colwell & Longino (2008), and Janzen & Hallwachs (2008). As part of a project on the butterflies of Belize (Shuey et al. 2005), eight males and two females from Belize were donated to USNM. Variation of wing pattern and male genitalia in this sample suggests hybridization between the unnamed taxon and A. togarna.

  • Variation. The black bands on the ventral wings of A. togarna are narrowest in Mexico and widest in Costa Rica (Figs. 12–13). The submarginal orange-yellow ventral hindwing band may extend posteriorly to the anal lobe (Fig. 12), to vein 2A (Fig. 13 top), or to vein Cu2 (Fig. 13 bottom). The tooth on the male genitalia valvae may be “long” and parallel to the sagittal plane (Fig. 27), shorter in length and parallel to the sagittal plane (Fig. 28), or shorter in length and at an oblique angle (Fig. 29). Position of the tooth on the valva is also highly variable (Figs. 27–29). There is no substantive variation in the structure of the female genitalia within A. togarna.

  • Reasons for expanding the concept of A. togarna as a biological species. Ventral wing pattern and male genitalia in Mexico do not vary much and are distinct from the ventral wing pattern and male genitalia that occur with little variation in Costa Rica (cf. Figs. 12, 13 bottom, 27, 29). However, in Guatemala and Belize, intermediate wing pattern and male genitalia forms occur, and the same wing pattern forms of A. togarna may have different male genitalia and vice versa. This result is most consistent with the hypothesis that the populations from Mexico to Costa Rica are one species.

  • Nomenclature. To stabilize the nomenclature of Thecla togarna Hewitson, 1867, a lectotype is designated. The lectotype is a male from the Hewitson Collection (Fig. 12) in the BMNH that has a red label “lectotype male designated by G. Lamas 2004,” but Lamas did not publish the lectotype designation. The lectotype is labeled Mexico, but in the original description, Thecla togarna was stated to be from Venezuela. Several lines of evidence suggest that Hewitson made a simple mistake. First, the proposed lectotype is a remarkably good fit to the illustration in the original description both in wing pattern and the way that the wings are set (Figs. 11–12). Second, the proposed lectotype is from the Hewitson collection, and no other extant specimen from that collection fits the original description. Third, A. togarna, which is clearly recognizable from the original description (Fig. 11) as the form that occurs widely in Mexico is unknown from Venezuela. There are no Venezuelan specimens in MIZA (Robbins unpubl.) nor are any others reported from any other museum collection.

  • Habitat. Wet lowland forest. Arawacus togarna is unrecorded from seasonally dry forest, but two specimens were collected at a locality 14 km east of Managua that is a mosaic of habitats (Anderson, pers. comm.).

  • Larval foodplants. The caterpillars of A. togarna eat the leaves of many species of Solanum (Solanaceae) in Costa Rica. Records from Janzen & Hallwachs (2008, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Alajuela and Guanacaste Provinces, 16 vouchers in USNM,) are Solanum jamaicen.se (07-SRNP-42513), S. hayesii (06-SRNP-65566, 06-SRNP-30585, 06-SRNP-30581, 06-SRNP-30247, 06-SRNP-30785, 00-SRNP-12688, 06-SRNP-30789, 06-SRNP-30784, 06-SRNP-65564, 07-SRNP-30003, 07-SRNP-30928), S. rugosum (06-SRNP-42660), and S. schlechtendalianum (05-SRNP-31191, 06-SRNP-30821, 05-SRNP-32441). Records from Dyer & Gentry (2002, 4 vouchers in USNM) are S. adherens, S. rudepanum, S. aturense (sipuranoides), S. rugosum, S. jamaicense, and S. (Cyphomandra) hardtwegii (cf. Bohs 1995 for generic nomenclature). Arawacus togarna has also been recorded in Colombia on Cestrum mariquitense (Solanaceae) (Beccaloni et al. 2008), but this record is a misidentification because A. togarna does not occur in Colombia (no vouchers were noted).

  • Distribution (Fig. 33). Arawacus togarna occurs on the Atlantic slope of Central America from central Mexico to Costa Rica. It is unknown from the Pacific slope, but two individuals from 14 km east of Managua were found in Nicaragua's central rift valley (Robbins & Anderson in prep.). Specimens in the A. togarna species complex from Panamá and from the Pacific coast of Costa Rica are A. linocides, not A. togarna.

  • Remarks. A “cream” colored dorsal hindwing scent patch occurs in all males of A. togarna (Fig. 16). It has not been reported previously, probably because its color is very similar to the surrounding “white” scales (Fig. 12 top). It occurs in A. togarna, A. lincoides, A. aetolus (Sulzer), and in modified forms in A. separata (Lathy) and A. aethesa (Hewitson) (Robbins unpubl.). In A. lincoides in Panamá, landed males being courted by other males rapidly vibrate their hindwings (Robbins unpubl.), a behavior that could conceivably be related to pheromones disseminated by these androconia.

  • Study series. For this paper, I examined 88 males and 36 females of A. togarna from 6 countries, including 17 male and 6 female genitalic dissections and 20 adults reared from larvae. I also examined an image of the lectotype of A. togarna provided by G. Lamas. Finally, I had access to the extensive data collated by Clench.

  • Figs. 27–29.

    Variation of Arawacus togarna male genitalia, ventral aspect of genital capsule with penis removed, posterior to top, scale 1 mm. 27. Mexico “long tooth, parallel”. 28. Belize “short tooth, parallel”. 29. Costa Rica “short tooth, oblique ”. Arrow points to tooth on valva.

    f27_01.jpg

    Figs. 30–33.

    Distributions. 30. Iaspis andersoni (stars). 31. Michaelus joseph (squares). 32. Ignata caldas (hearts). 33. Arawacus togarna (squares).

    f30_01.jpg

    Acknowledgements

    For the collegial sharing of biological and nomenclatural information, without which this paper would not have been written, I am deeply and sincerely indebted to Annette Aiello, Richard Anderson, Isidro Chacón, Mary Clench, Gerardo Lamas, and John Shuey. I am similarly grateful to Lee Dyer, Grant Gentry, Dan Janzen, and Winnie Hallwachs for collaborating on lycaenid foodplants and acknowledge NSF DEB 0515699 to D. H. Janzen, which helps support the rearing of lycaenids. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the memory of my friends Stan Nicolay and Gordon Small, who collected most of the type series in this paper. I thank Joe and Dawn Nicolay for their continuing support and assistance with Stan's legacy. I thank those in charge of the museum and private collections listed in the Methods for allowing use of data from these collections. My appreciation to Vichai Malikul for his superb genitalic figures, to Brian Harris for technical help of many kinds, to Pam Hudson for working with me on Arawacus characters, to Karie Darrow for advice on Photoshop, and to the Smithsonian Institution Libraries, especially Leslie Overstreet and her “crew”, for scanning an original illustration in an old book. I am grateful to Richard Anderson, Dawn Nicolay, and John Shuey for reading the manuscript and especially to Robert Busby, Marcelo Duarte, and Gerardo Lamas for making extensive comments that improved the manuscript markedly. Thank you to all.

    Literature Cited

    1.

    G. T Austin & K. Johnson . 1996. Theclinae of Rondônia, Brazil: Iaspis Kaye, taxonomic comments and descriptions of new species (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Trop. Lepid. 7(1): 45–59. Google Scholar

    2.

    Z. Bálint 2003. Description of Johnsonita johnbanksi sp. n. from Peru, with notes on the genus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Folia Entomol. Hungarina 64: 243–250. Google Scholar

    3.

    G. W. Beccaloni , A. L. Viloria , S. K. Hall & G. S. Robinson . 2008. Catalogue of the hostplants of the neotropical butterflies. Zaragoza [Spain]: Soc. Entomol. Aragonesa, 536 pp. Google Scholar

    4.

    L. Bohs 1995. Transfer of Cyphomandra (Solanaceae) and its species to Solanum. Taxon 44(4): 583–587. Google Scholar

    5.

    J. W. Brown 1983. A new species of Mitoura Scudder from southern California (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid. 21: 245–254. Google Scholar

    6.

    K. S. Brown 1982. Historical and ecological factors in the biogeography of aposematic neotropical butterflies. Amer. Zool. 22(2): 453–471. Google Scholar

    7.

    H. K. Clench 1961. Tribe Theclini, pp. 177–220. In : P. R. Ehrlich & A. H. Ehrlich , How to know the butterflies. Brown Company, Dubuque, Iowa. 262 pp. Google Scholar

    8.

    R. K. Colwell & J. T. Longino . 2008. Arthropods of La Selva Project (ALAS). < http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/ALAS/ALAS.html>. Accessed 29 Nov 2008. Google Scholar

    9.

    J. H. Comstock 1918: The wings of insects. The Comstock Publishing Company, Ithaca. 430 pp. Google Scholar

    10.

    W. P. Comstock & E. I. Huntington . 1961. An annotated list of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of the Western Hemisphere. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 69(2): 105–118. Google Scholar

    11.

    B. L. D'Abrera 1995. Butterflies of the Neotropical region. Part VII. Lycaenidae. Hill House, Black Rock. pp. 1098–1270. Google Scholar

    12.

    M. Draudt 1919–1920. Theclini F, pp. 744–812. In : A. Seitz (Ed.) Macrolepidoptera of the World, vol. V, The American Rhopalocera, Alfred Kernen Verlag, Stuttgart, 1140 pp., 194 pls. Google Scholar

    13.

    H. H. Druce 1907. On neotropical Lycaenidae, with descriptions of new species. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 566–632, 6 plates. Google Scholar

    14.

    L. A. Dyer & G. L. Gentry . 2002. Caterpillars and parasitoids of a tropical lowland wet forest < http://www.caterpillars.org>. Accessed 29 Nov 2008. Google Scholar

    15.

    J.N. Eliot 1973. The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement. Bull. Brit. Mus. (NaT. Hist.) Entomol. 28(No.6): 371–505. Google Scholar

    16.

    F.D. Godman & O. Salvin . 1887–1901. Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta. Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. London, Dulau & Col, Bernard Quaritch, Vol. II, 782 pp., Vol. III, 112 pls. Google Scholar

    17.

    J. P. W. Hall & K. R. Willmott . 2005. A new species of Paiwarria (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Eumaeini) from western Ecuador. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 107(4): 960–967 Google Scholar

    18.

    J. P. W. Hall & R. C. Busby . 2005. Five new Penaincisalia species (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Eumaeini) from the Andes of southern Ecuador and northern Peru. Zootaxa 797: 1–20 Google Scholar

    19.

    W.C. Hewitson 1867. Illustrations of Diurnal Lepidoptera. Part I. Lycaenidae. London, John Van Voorst 3: 77–114, 31–46 pl. Google Scholar

    20.

    W. C. Hewitson 1868. Descriptions of some new species of Lycaenidae. London, John Van Voorst, 36 pp. Google Scholar

    21.

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1967. Opinion 821. Iaspis Kaye, 1904 (Insecta, Lepidoptera): Designation of a type-species under the Plenary Powers. Bull. Zool. Nomenclature 24(4): 214–215. Google Scholar

    22.

    D. H. Janzen & W. Hallwachs . 2008. Dynamic database for an inventory of the macrocaterpillar fauna, and its food plants and parasitoids, of Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG), northwestern Costa Rica < http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu>. Accessed 29 Nov 2008. Google Scholar

    23.

    K. Johnson 1991. Neotropical hairstreak butterflies: Genera of the “Calycopis/Calystryma Grade” of Eumaeini (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae) and their diagnostics. Reports Mus. Nat Hist., Univ. Wisconsin 21: 128 pp. Google Scholar

    24.

    K. Johnson 1992. Genera and species of the Neotropical “elfin”-like hairstreak butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae). Reports of the Museum of Natural History, University of Wisconsin (Stevens Point) 22(1): 1–279. Google Scholar

    25.

    A. B. Klots 1970. Lepidoptera, pp. 115–130. In : S.L. Tuxen (editor), Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects. Munks-gaard, Copenhagen. Google Scholar

    26.

    S. S. Nicolay 1979. Studies in the genera of American hair-streaks. 5. A review of the Hubnerian genus Parrhasius and description of a new genus Michaelus (Lycaenidae: Eumaeini). Bull. Allyn Mus. 56: 1–51. Google Scholar

    27.

    S. S. Nicolay & R. K. Robbins . 2005. Five new dry-area South American Strymon species (Lycaenidae: Theclinae) and their biogeographic significance. J. Res. Lepid. 38: 35–49. Google Scholar

    28.

    R. S. Ridgely 1976. A guide to the birds of Panama. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. 394 pp. Google Scholar

    29.

    R. K. Robbins 1990. The Mitoura spinetorum complex in New Mexico and the validity of M. millerorum (Lycaenidae: Theclinae). J. Lepid. Soc. 44: 63–76. Google Scholar

    30.

    R. K. Robbins 1991. Evolution, comparative morphology, and identification of the eumaeine butterfly genus Rekoa Kaye (Lycaenidae: Theclinae). Smith. Contr. Zool. #498, 64 pp. Google Scholar

    31.

    R. K. Robbins 2000. The New World hairstreak genus Arawacus Kaye (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 102: 162–169. Google Scholar

    32.

    R. K. Robbins 2004a. Introduction to the checklist of Eumaeini (Lycaenidae), pp. xxiv–XXX. In : G. Lamas (Ed.), Checklist: Part 4A. Hesperioidea - Papilionoidea. In : J. B. Heppner (Ed.), Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Volume 5A. Gainesville, Association for Tropical Lepidoptera; Scientific Publishers. Google Scholar

    33.

    R. K. Robbins 2004b. Lycaenidae. Theclinae. Tribe Eumaeini, pp. 118–137. In : G. Lamas (Ed.), Checklist: Part 4A. Hesperioidea - Papilionoidea. In : J. B. Heppner (Ed.), Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Volume 5A. Gainesville, Association for Tropical Lepidoptera; Scientific Publishers. Google Scholar

    34.

    R. K. Robbins & A. Aiello . 1982. Foodplant and oviposition records for Panamanian Lycaenidae and Riodinidae. J. Lepid. Soc. 36: 65–75. Google Scholar

    35.

    R. K. Robbins & R. C. Busby . 2008a. Updated Phylogeny, Taxonomy, and Diversification of Janthecla Robbins & Venables (Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini). J. Res. Lepid. 41:5–13 Google Scholar

    36.

    R. K. Robbins & R. C. Busby . 2008b. Phylogeny, Taxonomy, and Sympatry of Timaeta (Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini): An Andean Montane Forest Endemic. Tijdschrift Entomol. 151: 229–257. Google Scholar

    37.

    R. K. Robbins & M. Duarte . 2004. Descriptions of new butterfly genera. Lycaenidae, Eumaeini, pp. 275–282. In : G. Lamas (Ed.), Checklist: Part 4A. Hesperioidea - Papilionoidea. In : J. B. Heppner (Ed.), Adas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Volume 5A. Gainesville, Association for Tropical Lepidoptera; Scientific Publishers. Google Scholar

    38.

    R. K. Robbins & M. Duarte . 2005. Two phylogenetically significant new Calycopis species (Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini). J. Res. Lepid. 38: 27–34. Google Scholar

    39.

    R. K. Robbins & G. B. Small . 1981. Wind dispersal of Panamanian hairstreak butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and its evolutionary significance. Biotropica 13: 308–315. Google Scholar

    40.

    J. A. Shuey , V. Giles , J. C. Meerman , P. Labus , C. W. Schutte , & P. Kovarik . 2005. New additions to the butterfly fauna of Belize. J. Lepid. Soc. 59(2): 83–88, 1 tab. (25 July) Google Scholar

    41.

    R. E. Snodgrass 1935. Principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 667 pp. Google Scholar

    42.

    J.F. Zikán & W. Zikán . 1968. In seto-fauna do Itatiaia e da Mantiqueira. III. Lepidoptera. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 3:45–109. Google Scholar
    Robert K. Robbins "Four Commonly Confused Hairstreaks (Lycaenidae, Theclinae, Eumaeini): Three Need Names, One Does Not," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 64(1), 1-13, (1 March 2010). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.v64i1.a1
    Received: 11 December 2008; Accepted: 27 May 2009; Published: 1 March 2010
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    13 PAGES


    Share
    SHARE
    KEYWORDS
    androconia
    Arawacus
    Iaspis
    Ignata
    Larval foodplants
    Michaelus
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
    Get copyright permission
    Back to Top