Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2010 Review of Symmocinae (Lepidoptera: Autostichidae) in North America with the Description of a New Genus and Species
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The three species of Symmocinae (Autostichidae) known to occur in North America are reviewed, and imagos and male and female genitalia are illustrated. A new genus and new species of Symmocinae are described and novel morphological characters are illustrated.

The Symmocinae (Lepidoptera: Autostichidae) includes 170 species of moths in 42 genera, with highest diversity in xeric areas of the Palearctic Region (Gozmány 1957, 1959, 1963, 1964; Hodges 1983). Larvae are known to feed on decaying plant materials (Gozmány 1963; Griffith 1890; Powell 1960). Three species have been reported from North America: Sceptea aequepulvella (Chambers) (Figs. 1, 5) Oegoconia quadripuncta (Haworth) (Figs. 2, 6), and Symmoca signatella Herrich-Schäffer (Figs. 3, 7), with the latter two species introduced from the Palearctic Region (Hodges 1983; Powell 1960). Specimens of an unknown symmocine, initially collected in Mississippi and later from other states, have been identified here as a new species as well as a new genus.

The classification and phylogenetic position of Symmoca and related genera have been unstable. In recent years, the Symmocinae has been treated as a family (Gozmány 1963), a subfamily of Blastobasidae (Hodges 1983), and a subfamily of Autostichidae (Hodges 1999; Kaila 2004).

Hodges (1999) defined the Autostichidae by homoplasous characters of an articulated gnathos (Fig. 8) and presence of spiniform setae on abdominal terga (Fig. 12). He further defined the Symmocinae by homoplasous characters of a forewing with CuP absent (Fig. 10A), female with retinaculum composed of a series of anteriorly directed scales between CuA and R (Fig. 16), abdominal terga crossed by bands of slender, spiniform setae, sometimes deciduous, and the gnathos forming a mesial hook (Fig. 8).

The purpose of this study is to review and illustrate North American species of Symmocinae and describe novel morphological characters of a new genus and species that may be valuable for resolving the phylogenetic relationships of gelechioid taxa in future studies.

Methods

Published figures of 139 species representing 42 genera, including male genitalia of 38 type species, were examined. Figures of male genitalia are lacking for type species of five genera, including Tenieta Gozmány, Hamartema Gozmány, Symmoletria Gozmány, Sceptea Walsingham, and Gigantoletria Gozmány, the latter four described to include species represented only by females.

One to two male and female specimens of the following species were borrowed from the National Museum of Natural History (USNM): Amselina oxybiella (Millière), Aprominta designatella (Herrich-Schäffer), Nestorellus meyricki Gerasimov, and the three species in North America, Sceptea aequepulvella (Chambers), Oegoconia quadripuncta (Haworth), and Symmoca signatella Herrich-Schäffer.

Dissection and slide mounting methods for genitalia followed Clarke (1941), except the preparations were stained in eosin and mounted in euparol. Wing venation slides were made with the same method used for genitalia, except the denuded wing was stained in eosin overnight. A hind leg from each species of the known Symmocinae in North America was cleaned of scales, stained, and slide mounted separately. Whole body mounts of the new species were made following methodology of Lee & Brown (2006), and these were compared with whole body mounts of the following taxa: Agonopterix thelmae Clarke, Antaeotricha humilis (Zeller), Antaeotricha leucillana (Zeller), Autosticha kyotensis (Matsumura), Blastobasis glandulella (Riley), Callima argenticinctella Clemens, Calosima lepidophaga (Clarke), Coleophora cratipennella Clemens, Dichomeris ligulella Hübner, Durrantia piperatella (Zeller), Ethmia longimaculella (Chambers), Ethmia trifurcella (Chambers), Eupragia hospita Hodges, Gelechia albisparsella (Chambers), Gerdana caritella Busck, Glyphidocera democratica (Meyrick), Glyphidocera lactiflosella (Chambers), Inga sparsiciliella Clemens, Homaledra heptathalma Busck, Machimia tentoriferella Clemens, and Pseuderotis obiterella (Busck).

Figs. 1–4.

Adults of Symmocinae in North America. 1, Sceptea aequepulvella (Cham.). 2, Oegoconia quadripuncta (Haw.). 3, Symmoca signatella (H.-S.). 4, Spinitibia hodgesi. Scale bar: 1.0 mm.

f01_177.jpg

A Leica MZ 125 Stereo-Microscope and Olympus Compound Microscope were used for examining specimens and slide mounts. Images were made with a Leica TCS NT confocal laser scanning microscope, LEO S360 scanning electron microscope, and a Leica stereoscope with Image Pro Plus 5.1 program for auto formatting. For scanning electron microscopy, specimens were air dried and mounted on aluminum stubs with silver paste, coated with gold-palladium, and examined at an accelerating voltage of 5kV. Distributional data are based on publications and on specimens in collections of the Mississippi Entomological Museum (MEM) and USNM.

DNA samples were extracted from two pairs of hindlegs from two pinned specimens of the new species following the protocol for Qiagen's DNeasy Tissue Kit. Five of ten clones could be sequenced and checked in GenBank using the BLAST function to determine the identity of spore-like structures associated with the hindlegs.

Symmocinae

Symmocinae Gozmány, 1957, Annales. Historico-Naturales Musei. Nationalis Hungarici, 8 (n. s.), 326; Bradley et al., 1972, A Check List of British Insects; Hodges, 1978, Moths America North of Mexico, 7; Hodges, 1999, Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies Vol. 1: Evolution, Systematics, and Biogeography, 146.

Figs. 5–7.

Male genitalia of Symmocinae in North America. 5, Sceptea aequepulvella (Cham.). 6, Oegoconia quadripuncta (Haw.). 7, Symmoca signatella (H.-S.). Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

f05_177.jpg

Type-genus: Symmoca Hübner, 1825 Symmocidae Gozmány, 1963, Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 9: 67.

Diagnosis of subfamily. Defined by forewing with CuP absent (parallelism with other Gelechioidea), female with retinaculum consisting of a series of anteriorly directed scales between CuA and R (parallelism with other Gelechioidea), second abdominal sternum with venula, venula + apodeme, or apodeme (polymorphy), fore wing with R5 terminating on outer margin or on costa (polymorphy). Gnathos a slender band fused to tegumen, forming non-articulated mesial hook, abdominal terga II-VII crossed by bands or entirely covered by spiniform setae, sometimes deciduous (Hodges 1999).

Figs. 8–10.

Genitalia and wing venation of Spinitibia hodgesi. 8–9, Male. Scale bar: 0.5mm. 10. A, forewing. B, hindwing. Scale bar: 1.0 mm.

f08_177.jpg

Figs. 11–14.

Female genitalia. 11, Sceptea aequepulvella (Cham.). 12, Oegoconia quadripuncta (Haw.). 13, Symmoca signatella (H.-S.). 14. Spinitibia hodgesi. Scale bar: 1.0 mm.

f11_177.jpg

Fig. 15.

Spinitibia hodgesi, abdominal spiniform setae.

f16_177.jpg

Fig. 16.

Spinitibia hodgesi, forewing retinaculum (arrow).

f16_177.jpg

Figs. 17–18.

Spinitibia hodgesi, metatibial spiniform setae. 17, enlarged sockets (arrow) in cluster of spiniform setae. 18, spiniform seta with spore-like structure.

f17_177.jpg

Sceptea aequepulvella (Chambers) (Figs. 1, 5, 11, 20)

  • Gelechia aequepulvella Chambers, 1872, The Canadian Entomologist 4: 192.

  • Glyphidocera aberratella Busck, 1907, Journal of the New York Entomological Society 15: 138.

  • Sceptea aequepulvella: Hodges, 1983, Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico, p. 14.

  • The description of this species was based on an unknown number of specimens collected from Kentucky. Catalogs of type specimens in the Museum of Comparative Zoology (Miller & Hodges 1990) and the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (Brown et al. 2004) do not mention this species, and the location of the type specimen is unknown. The following description is based on specimens that were identified by early workers in the USNM and more recently collected specimens that were compared to older material.

  • Description. Imago. Head and thorax dark gray scaled; labial palpus ascendant, reaching top of head. Forewing length 5.0–6.0 mm, brown intermixed with almost equal numbers of yellowish scales throughout wing, but with variable concentrations of brown scales in some specimens with brown concentrated on basal half of costa, as one or two spots in discal cell, as spot between R4 and R5 near apex, as spot near tornus, and as spots between veins at termen. Hindwing pale grayish brown. Second abdominal sternum with venula + apodeme.

  • Male genitalia (Fig. 5). Uncus with rounded apex; gnathos with apex weakly curved dorsally; juxta forming a wide U-shaped plate dorsally; tegumen below juxta forming sclerotized lateral arms, weakly sclerotized medially; valva with short, costal projection at 2/3 length, with a series of spiniform setae extending ventromedially from costal projection, valva narrowing from costal projection to a rounded apex; sacculus without projection, with medial fold terminating at 1/2 length of valva; phallus tubular, cornutus spiniform, basally hook shaped.

  • Female genitalia (Fig. 11). Papillae anales sparsely setose. Posterior apophyses slightly shorter than papillae anales. Anterior apophyses slightly shorter than posterior apophyses, divided near middle to form dorsal branch extending to eighth tergum and ventral branch extending to eighth sternum. Ostium bursae encircled by sclerotized ring of ductus bursae, ductus bursae with membranous portion subequal in length with papillae anales, gradually widening anteriorly to an elongate, elliptical corpus bursae. Signum absent.

  • Distribution. USA (District of Columbia, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania).

  • Figs. 19–20.

    Scales and setae on ventral surface of antenna. 19, Spinitibia hodgesi. 20, Sceptea aequepulvella.

    f19_177.jpg

    Oegoconia quadripuncta (Haworth) (Figs. 2, 6, 12)

  • Recurvaria quadripuncta Haworth, 1828, Lepidoptera Britannica Part IV, p. 557.

  • Oegoconia quadripuncta: Stainton, 1854, Insecta Britannica. Lepidoptera: Tineina 3, p. 162.

  • Symmoca novimundi Busck, 1915, Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 17: 84.

  • This Palearctic species occurs throughout Europe (Gozmány & Riedl 1996) and was introduced into the northeastern United States sometime before 1915 with subsequent dispersal to other states including California (Powell 1992).

  • Description. Imago. Head brown; labial palpus ascendant, reaching top of head; thorax dark gray with tegulae Brown basally, pale yellow apically. Forewing length 5.5–7.0 mm, dark brown with pale yellow spots at base and below costa at 1/4 length, and transverse bands extending from costa to dorsum beyond 1/2 length and at 3/4 length, the latter broken near CuA1. Hindwing pale grayish brown. Second abdominal sternum with venula + apodeme.

  • Male genitalia (Fig. 6). Uncus with rounded apex; gnathos longer and more strongly curved apically than in S. aequepulvella; tegumen hood-like, evenly sclerotized; valva tapered to rounded apex, costa without projection; sacculus with apical half forming a free projection, projection slightly curved dorsomedially, apex pointed; phallus slender, tubular, everted vesica with microtrichia, apex of vesica with dense group of cornuti composed of unsocketed microspines.

  • Female genitalia (Fig. 12). Papillae anales densely setose. Posterior apophyses slightly longer than papillae anales. Anterior apophyses slightly longer than posterior apophyses. Ostium bursae with cup-shaped antrum, posterior margin divided medially and forming two invaginated pockets laterally. Ductus bursae membranous, more than 2× length of papillae anales, gradually widening anteriorly to spherical corpus bursae. Signum absent.

  • Distribution. USA (California, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia), Europe.

  • Symmoca signatella Herrich-Schäffer (Figs. 3, 7, 13, 22)

  • Symmoca signatella Herrich-Schäffer, [1855,] 1854, Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge Europa, 5: 111.

  • This Palearctic species is widespread in Europe and was first reported from the United States as an introduced species in Los Angeles, Riverside, and Orange Cos., California (Powell 1960).

  • Description. Imago. Head and thorax pale gray; labial palpus ascendant, extending beyond top of head. Forewing length 8.0–9.0 mm; ground color pale gray, apices of many scales brown to dark brown giving a peppered appearance, costa with dark brown spots at base, 1/3 length, and 2/3 length, basal 1/3 of wing with dark brown line angled from discal cell towards tornus, outwardly bordered by 1–2 pale yellow spots, a dark brown longitudinal streak on Rs near 1/2 wing length, Bordered by pale yellow spot in discal cell, apical 2/3 of wing with triangular dark brown spot extending from apex of discal cell to tornus, bordered by pale yellow spot in discal cell, two dark brown, longitudinal streaks on M1 and M2 apical to discal cell, outer margin with dark brown spots between veins. Hindwing grayish brown. Second abdominal sternum with venula + apodeme.

  • Male genitalia (Fig. 7). Uncus with notched apex; gnathos large, strongly hook shaped; valva gradually widening apically, costal and apical margins forming right angle at apex, costal appendage long, extending from base of valva to near apex; saccular projection narrowed at 1/4 length and sharply curving dorsally over valva and extending beyond the costa; phallus short, stout, tubular, with numerous spiniform cornuti.

  • Female genitalia (Fig. 13). Papillae anales short, moderately setose. Posterior apophyses almost 2× length of papillae anales. Anterior apophyses slightly shorter than posterior apophyses. Ductus bursae short, sclerotized from ostium bursae to near ductus seminalis, widened and membranous from ductus seminalis to corpus bursae. Signum present on anterior end of corpus bursae, bidentate.

  • Distribution. USA (California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon), Europe.

  • Figs. 21–22.

    Metatibial base. 21, Spinitibia hodgesi, lateral (A) and medial (B). 22, Symmoca signatella. Scale bars: 0.25 mm.

    f21_177.jpg

    Spinitibia gen. nov.

  • Description. Head loosely scaled; labial palpus scaled, ascendant, reaching top of head, second and third segments subequal in length, third segment with acute apex, scales appressed, organ of vom Rath absent; antennae simple, apices of scales truncated; ocellus absent; posterior area of sitophore with four campaniform sensilla on posterior area in trapezoid pattern. Thorax with metascutellum wider than long, anterior margin rounded; dorsomedial margins of the epinotum separated. Metathoracic tibia with group of spiniform setae on dorsobasal surface, with much larger sockets than adjacent scales, scale sockets clustered into groups on medial surface and weakly defined rows on lateral surface. Forewing with apex angled between R4 and R5; eleven veins present; Sc-R4 to costa; R5-CuA2 to termen; R4 and R5 stalked, M2and M3 fused, CuA1 and CuA2 present, CuP absent, 1A and 2A with distinct basal fork. Hindwing subquadrate, apex slightly pointed between Rs and M1; all veins present; Rs and M1 stalked; M2 closer to M3 than to M1; M3(should be subscript) shortly stalked with CuA1; CuA2 and CuP present. Abdomen with second sternum having apodeme + venula; terga II-VII with bands of spiniform setae interspersed with scales.

  • Male genitalia. Uncus slender basal ly, widened and finely setose apically. Tegumen subtriangular, with widened ventral base. Gnathos large, heavily sclerotized, hooklike, non-articulated. Valva elongate, apex rounded, without costal and saccular process, with well developed basocostal projection. Vinculum forming narrow, triangular band. Saccus not developed. Phallus tubular, cornuti absent.

  • Female genitalia. Papillae anales sparsely setose. Posterior apophyses longer than length of papillae anales. Anterior apophyses slightly shorter than length of posterior apophyses. Ostium bursae covered by subtriangular lamella antevaginalis. Ductus bursae long, membranous, gradually widening to spherical corpus bursae. Signum absent.

  • Diagnosis. Spinitibia is defined by the following apomorphies: 1) dorsobasal surface of metatibia with a group of enlarged spiniform setae having much larger sockets than adjacent scales (Figs. 17, 21); 2) antennal scales truncated (Fig. 19), instead of dentate (Fig. 20); 3) ocellus absent (shared with Symmoca, Sceptea, and Oegoconia); 4) organ of vom Rath absent (shared with Sceptea, and Oegoconia); 5) valva lacking saccular or costal projections (shared with Sceptea and Exorgana); 6) the clustering of scale sockets on the metatibia (Fig. 21B), in contrast to scattered (Fig. 22) or in rows, shared with Blastobasinae; 7) the metascutum with the anterior width greater than the length at middle and the anterior margin being rounded (Fig. 23), rather than the anterior margin being angled and longer at the middle (Fig. 24), an apomorphy shared with Autostichinae, and the terminal taxa of Peleopodidae, Amphisbatidae, and Gelechiidae in the phylogeny of Hodges (1999).

  • Etymology. The generic name, Spinitibia, refers the spiniform setae that are present on the hind tibia.

  • Spinitibia hodgesi sp. nov. (Figs. 4, 8–10,1419, 21, 23)

  • Description. Imago. Head and thorax yellowish white mixed with yellowish brown; prothorax with longitudinal median dark brown band and two lateral bands. Antennae yellowish white, 2/3 to 3/4 length of forewing, length of middle flagellomeres 2× width. Labial palpus with second segment dark brown mixed with variable amount of yellowish white laterally yellowish white with scattered dark brown scales ventrally and medially, apical segment with dark brown spots or bands basally and preapically. Forewing length 5.0–8.0 mm, ground color yellowish white, with scattered dark brown scales except for longitudinal streaks of yellowish-white between Sc and R and on dorsum near base, in discal cell and between Cu and 1A+2A at midlength, and between R5 and M1, apical half of costa and areas between veins at outer margin with variable amounts of yellowish white, basal f/4 of wing along Cu with dark brown streak, apical 1/3 of wing with variable dark brown streaks along some R and M veins, pale area in discal cell bordered basally and apically by dark brown spots. Hindwing pale brownish gray. Forelegs dark brown except tarsi pale brown banded with yellowish-white, midlegs with dark brown femur, tibia and tarsi yellowish-white mixed with grayish-brown, hindlegs yellowish white mixed with grayish-brown, tibia with fringe of yellowish-white setiform scales on dorsal surface in both sexes. Abdomen yellowish-gray, except terga posteriorly lined with yellowish-white.

  • Male genitalia. As in description of genus.

  • Female genitalia. As in description of genus.

  • Diagnosis. In addition to characters of the genus, S. hodgesi can be distinguished from other species of Symmocinae by the mesonotum having lateral and median longitudinal dark brown bands and the forewing having dark brown and yellow streaks.

  • Types. Holotype., Miss. Lowndes Co., Plymouth Bluff Center, 33°30′59″N, 88°29′56″W, 18 Jun 2007, R.L. Brown. MEM No. 38622. Deposited in U.S. National Museum of Natural History. The holotype is intact with all appendages present and is not dissected.

  • Paratypes (n = 56). Alabama: Bibb Co., Bibb Co. Glades Preserve 337deg;03′28″N, 87°02′2L″W 5 Jun 2003, R.L. Brown and S. Lee (1♀). Kansas: Riley Co., Konza Prairie R.N.A., 39°05′57″N, 96°35′14″W, 12 Jun 1999, R.L. Brown (2♂), same data except 39°05′1″N, 96°34′29″W, 14 Jun 1999, D.M. Pollock (1♂). Louisiana: Bossier Parish, Barksdale A.F.B., 32°29′19″N, 93°35′20″W, 9 May 1996, D.M. Pollock (1♂), same data except 32°31′13″N, 93°35′46″W, 21 May 1996, R.L. Brown and D. Pollock (1♂), same data except 32°29′29″N, 93°35′07″W, 8 Aug 1996 (1♂), 21 May 1996 (1♂, genitalia slide MEM 2187), R.L. Brown and D. Pollock, 24 Aug 1996 (1♂), 13 Sep 1996 (13), R.L. Brown. Mississippi: Bolivar Co., Mississippi River Levee, 33°36′29″N, 91°07′34″W, 17 Aug 1993, D.M. Pollock (2♂). George Co., 3 mi North of Lucedale, 5–18 Aug 1996 (1♂), 19 Aug-17 Sep 1996 (2♂), 18 Sep-11 Oct 1996 (13), R. Kergosien. Grenada Co., T22N R3E, Sec. 31NW, 7–13 Aug 1991 (13), 23–29 Oct 1991 (13), R.L. Brown, same data except T21N R2E, Sec. 7S, 18N: 28 Aug-3 Sep 1991, R.L. Brown (2♂), same data except T21N R2E, Sec. 12,3N & R3E, Sec 7S, 18N, 21–28 May 1991 (1♂, wholebody slide MEM 2188), 24–30 Jul 1991 (1♂), R.L. Brown. Holmes Co., Holmes Co. St. Pk. 3 Jun 2001, R.L. Brown (2♂). Issaquena Co., 2 mi E of Tallulah [Louisiana], 1–5 May 1996, R. Kergosien (1♂, wing venation slide MEM 2095, genitalia slide MEM 2186). Lowndes Co., Plymouth Bluff Center, 33°30′59″N, 88°29′56″W, 18 Jun 2007, R.L. Brown (3♂), T17N R16E, Sec. 5, 11 May 1991, D.M. Pollock (3♂, genitalia slide MEM 1030), same data except T17N R16E, Sec. 34, 3 Jun 1991 (1♂), 10 Jun 1994 (4♂), D.M. Pollock, 20 May 1992, R.L. Brown (1♂), 16 May 1993, R.L. Brown and D. Pollock (2♂,), 10 Jun 1993, D.M. Pollock (1♂,), 24 Aug 1993, R.L. Brown and D. Pollock (1♂,). Oktibbeha Co., T18N R14E, Sec. 23, 28 May 1989, R.L. Brown and B.B. Brown (1♂, wing venation slide MEM 2096), same data except T19N R15E, Sec. 16, 27 Apr 1991, D.M. Pollock (1♂), same data except 6 mi SW Starkville, 19 Jun 1986, R.L. Brown and B.B. Brown (1♂); Osborn, 33°30′41″N, 88°44′08″W, 13 Jun 1997(1♀), 17 Jul 2002 (1♂, genitalia slide MEM 1305), R.L. Brown. Panola Co., John W. Kyle St. Pk., 34°25′38″N, 89°48′21″W, 1–3 Jun 1997, R.L. Brown (13). Pike Co., Percy Quin State Park, 311051N, 903154W, 1–3 Jun 1998, R.L. Brown (13). Scott Co., 2 mi E Forest Harrell Hill Prairie, T6N R8E, Sec. 25&26, 8 Sep 1990, D. and M. Hildebrandt (1♂). Smith Co., Bienville Natl. Forest, 32°10′06″N, 89°20′54″W, 30 May 2000, R.L. Brown (1♂, genitalia slide MEM 1221). Winston Co., Noxubee N.W. Refuge, T16N R14E, Sec. 13SE, 14 Jun 1992, T.L. Schiefer (13), same data except Tombigbee Nat. Forest, 33°16′05″N, 89°06′01″W, 17 May 1999 (2♂), 10 Aug l999 (1♀) J.A. MacGown, same data except 33°10′20″N, 89°03′55″W, 25 May 1999, R.L. Brown (1♀, genitalia slide MEM 1031), same data except 33°10′31″N, 89°02′38″W, 3 May 1999, D.M. Pollock (1♀). Paratypes are deposited in the Canadian National Collection (Ottawa), Mississippi Entomological Museum (Mississippi), National Museum of Natural History (Washington D.C.) and The Natural History Museum (London).

  • Distribution. Fifty-seven specimens (52 males, 5 females) have been collected during April–October in the midsouthern states and Kansas (Fig. 23).

  • Etymology. The species epithet is a patronym for Ronald W. Hodges, who first recognized this species as being a new genus and new species.

  • Figs. 23–24.

    Confocal images of metascutellum (white arrow) and epinotum (blue arrow). 23, Spinitibia hodgesi. 24, Glyphidocera juniperella (Glyphidoceridae).

    f23_177.jpg

    Fig. 25.

    Distribution of Spinitibia hodgesi.

    f25_177.jpg

    Discussion

    The assignment of Spinitibia to Symmocinae is validated by presence of an unarticulated gnathos, abdominal terga with bands of spines, hooked gnathos, unique form of the female retinaculum, and absence of forewing vein CuP. The forms of the uncus and female genitalia (Fig. 10) are similar to those in other genera of Symmocinae.

    Spinitibia hodgesi is the second known endemic species of Symmocinae in North America. Most specimens have been collected in a variety of dry forests, but 18 specimens have been collected in prairies, cedar glades, inland dunes, and old fields.

    Scanning electron microscopy revealed spore-like structures on the spiniform setae of the hindleg, some of which are imbedded between longitudinal ridges (Fig. 15). DNA sequences from the hindlegs revealed the presence of a basidiomycete mushroom (Russula sp.) in one clone, and basidiomycete yeasts (Cystofilobasidium sp. and Asterotremella sp.) in three clones. However, the spore-like structures are not considered to be of fungal origin, and they are smaller than the smallest yeast cells (Steven Miller personal communication); thus, their identity remains unknown. Similar spore-like structures were detected on the antenna of a specimen of Sceptea aequepulvella borrowed from the U.S. National Museum. Such spore-like structures have not been seen on bodies of a large number of species of Tortricidae and Gelechiidae in the MEM that have been examined previously with scanning electron microscopy.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Ronald W. Hodges for confirming the undescribed status of Spinitibia hodgesi. We thank John Brown and David Adamski for making loans of specimens from the U.S. National Museum. We thank Richard E. Baird, Mississippi State University, for cloning the DNA samples, and Steven Miller, University of Wyoming, for confirming that the spore-like structures were not of fungal origin. We thank Terrence Schiefer and Gerald Baker for reviewing this manuscript. We thank the staff of Bon Secour National Wildlife Refuge and Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge for allowing collection of specimens on land under their management. Support for collection of specimens and this research was provided by National Science Foundation grants BSR-9024810, DEB-9200856, and DEB-0416078 and by Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station project MIS-6538. Approved for publication as Journal Article No J-11600 of the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University.

    Literature Cited

    1.

    J. D. Bradley , D. S. Fletcher , & P. E. S. Whalley . 1972. Lepidoptera. In G.S. Kloet and W.D. Hincks (eds.), A check list of British insects. Second edition (revised), viii + 153 pp. Royal Entomological Society, London. Google Scholar

    2.

    J. W. Brown , D. Adamski , R. W. Hodges , & S. M. Bahr II . 2004. Catalog of the type specimens of Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera) in the collection of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Zootaxa 510: 1–160. Google Scholar

    3.

    A. Busck 1907. New genera and species of American Microlepidoptera. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 15: 134–140. Google Scholar

    4.

    A. Busck 1915. Descriptions of new North American Microlepidoptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 17: 79–94. Google Scholar

    5.

    V. T. Chambers 1872. Microlepidoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 4: 191–195. Google Scholar

    6.

    J. F. G. Clarke 1941. The preparation of the slides of the genitalia of Lepidoptera. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 36: 149–161. Google Scholar

    7.

    L. A. Gozmány 1957. Notes on the generic group Symmoca Hbn. (Lep. Gelechiidae). Annales. Historico-Naturales Musei. Nationalis Hungarici 8 (n. s.): 325–346. Google Scholar

    8.

    L. A. Gozmíny 1959. Some new considerations on the generic group Symmoca Hbn. (Lep., Gelechiidae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 5: 41–48. Google Scholar

    9.

    L. A. Gozmíny 1963. The family Symmocidae and the description of new taxa mainly from the Near East (Lepidoptera). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 9: 67–134. Google Scholar

    10.

    L. A. Gozmíny 1964. On the generic groups Eremica Walsingham and Symmocoides Amsel (Lepidoptera: Symmocidae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 10: 101–129. Google Scholar

    11.

    L. A. Gozmány & T. Riedl . 1996. Autostichidae, pp. 97–100. In O. Karsholt & J. Razowski (eds), The Lepidoptera of Europe: A distributional checklist. Apollo Books, Stenstrup. 380 pp. Google Scholar

    12.

    A. F. Griffith 1890. Symmoca signatella, H.-S., a recent addition to the British fauna (Lepidoptera). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 2: 8. Google Scholar

    13.

    A. H. Haworth 1828. Lepidoptera Britannica. Part IV: 512–609. J. Murray, London. Google Scholar

    14.

    G. A. W. Herrich-Schäffer 1847–1855. Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa. Volume 5, 394 pp., 132 pls. Regensburg. Google Scholar

    15.

    R. W. Hodges 1978. Gelechioidea, Cosmopterigidae. In R.B. Dominick et al. (eds.), Moths of America north of Mexico. 6.1: [i]–x + 1–166, pl. 1–6. London. Google Scholar

    16.

    R. W. Hodges 1983. Gelechioidea, pp. 11–25. In R.W. Hodges et al. (eds.), Check list of the Lepidoptera of America north of Mexico. E.W. Classey Ltd. and the Wedge Entomological Research Foundation. London. 284 pp. Google Scholar

    17.

    R. W. Hodges 1999. Gelechioidea, pp. 131–158. In N.P. Kristensen (ed.), Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies Vol. 1 : Evolution, systematics, and biogeography. The Handbook of Zoology/Handbuck der Zoologie. Walter de Gruyter. Berlin and New York. 491 pp. Google Scholar

    18.

    L. Kaila 2004. Phylogeny of the superfamily Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia): an exemplar approach. Cladistics 20: 303–340. Google Scholar

    19.

    S. Lee & R. L. Brown . 2006. A new method for preparing slide mounts of whole bodies of microlepidoptera. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 9: 249–253. Google Scholar

    20.

    S. E. Miller & R. W. Hodges . 1990. Primary types of microlepidoptera in the Museum of Comparative Zoology (with a discursion on V.T. Chambers' work). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 152: 45–87. Google Scholar

    21.

    J. A. Powell 1960. Symmoca signatella H.-S. in California (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 36: 155. Google Scholar

    22.

    J. A. Powell 1992. Recent colonization of the San Francisco Bay area, California, by exotic moths (Lepidoptera: Tineoidea, Gelechioidea, Tortricoidea, Pyraloidea). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 68: 105–121. Google Scholar

    23.

    H. T. Stainton 1854. Insecta Britannica. Lepidoptera: Tineina 3. L. Reeve, London, viii + 313 pp., 10 pls. Google Scholar
    Sangmi Lee and Richard L. Brown "Review of Symmocinae (Lepidoptera: Autostichidae) in North America with the Description of a New Genus and Species," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 64(4), 177-187, (1 December 2010). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.v64i4.a1
    Received: 1 May 2009; Accepted: 18 January 2010; Published: 1 December 2010
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    11 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top