Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2010 Oviposition Preference and Nutritional Indices of Papilio polytes L. (Papilionidae) Larvae on Four Rutaceous (Sapindales: Rutaceae) Host Plants
Abstract

Oviposition preference and larval developmental performance of the butterfly, Papilio polytes L. on four rutaceous host plants, Citrus aurantifolia (Chrism.) Swing, Citrus reticulata Blanco, Citrus hystrix DC, and Murraya koenigii (L.) Sprengle, were investigated in outdoor cages. Maxima of eggs were laid on C. reticulata, followed by C. aurantifolia, but the numbers laid on the two host plants were not significantly different from each other; however, these numbers differed significantly (F = 155.70; P < 0.01) from those laid on C. hysrix and M. koenigii; the last host plant was the least preferred for egg laying. Leaves were significantly the preferred site (and in turn the underside of leaves) over stems for deposition of eggs in all host plants; negligible number of eggs was also laid on plant pots. The duration of 5th instar larval development was the shortest on C. reticulata and significantly different (P < 0.01) from that on M. koenigii, but did not differ significantly between the three Citrus species. The nitrogen content in leaves of all four host plants differed significantly (P < 0.01), with C. reticulata containing 4.52%, followed by C. aurantifolia (4.37%), C. hystrix (4.29%), and M. koenigii (3.73%), while the water content of leaves was significantly the lowest in M. koenigii (71.72%), compared to the three Citrus species (76.38–79.12%) among which the water content did not significantly differ. Relative consumption rate (RCR) and fecal dry weight of 5th instar larvae feeding on M. koenigii were the highest and significantly different (P < 0.01) from the other three host plants. Pupal dry weight, relative growth rate (RGR), efficiency conversion of digested food (ECD), efficiency conversion of ingested food (ECI) of M. koenigii were significantly lowest compared to the three Citrus species. The values of RGR, ECD, and ECI of the 5th instar larvae were similar for the three Citrus species; the approximate digestibility (AD) values were similar for all four host plants. This study shows that C. reticulata was the best host plant among the three Citrus spp. and M. koenigii was the least preferred.

The common mormon butterfly, Papilio polytes L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) is a tropical or subtropical papilionid butterfly distributed from Southeast Asia to the Southwestern Islands of Japan (Corbet & Pendlebury 1992; Nakayama et al. 2003; Nakayama & Honda 2004). Papilio polytes is known to feed on various genera of Rutaceae, such as Murraya, Triphasia, Glycosmis, Aegle, Zanthoxylum, Toddalia, Euodia, Atalantia and Poncirus in the forests (Corbet & Pendlebury 1992). In recent years, this butterfly has adapted to the urban/suburban environments and is found to feed on citrus plants (Corbet & Pendlebury 1992); this feeding adaptation has made P. polytes a potentially serious pest in citrus orchards.

In Lepidoptera, host plant selection for larval development and propagation is commonly assumed to be the prerogative of the ovipositing female (Singer 1984; Udayagiri & Mason 1995). Based on this assumption, many studies have been conducted on the relationship between adult host preference and larval performance (Singer 1984; Nylin & Janz 1993; Berdegue et al. 1998; Jallow et al. 2001; Forister 2004).

In phytophagous insects, larval growth and longevity as well as fecundity of the adult are influenced by the nutritional value of the host plants (Bernays & Chapman 1994). Larval development and survival depend on the food quality determined by nutrient content and the presence of secondary compounds. The food quality affects larval developmental time as well as larval mass. A quantitative analysis of the consumption and utilization of host plants by herbivorous insects is a commonly used tool in studies of plant-insect interactions (Scriber & Slansky 1981). For these herbivores, time to achieve pupation and pupal mass are good measures of the suitability of a particular host plant (Penz & Araujo 1990).

Understanding the host plant selection behavior and the effects of various host plant species on growth and larval performance of P. polytes is an important prerequisite for developing pest management strategies for this insect (Nylin & Janz 1996; Janz & Nylin 1997; Barros & Zucoloto 1999; Catta-Preta & Zucoloto 2003). In the present study, the oviposition preference of P. polytes on three species of commercially grown citrus [Citrus aurantofolia (Christm.) Swing., Citrus hystrix DC. and Citrus reticulata Blanco] and a commonly domesticated spicy leaf rutaceous species, Murraya koenigii (L.) Sprengel was evaluated and the life cycle of this butterfly on four rutaceous host plants was studied. The performance of P. polytes larvae on the host plants in terms of nutritional indices was also assessed.

Materials and Methods

Host plants. Selection of the rutaceous host plants for this study was based on their potential value as commercial plants. Three commercially grown citrus species, C. aurantifolia, C. hystrix and C. reticulata, and a partially domesticated spicy leaf species, M. koenigii, popularly used as an ingredient (curry leaf) in local food in Malaysia were selected. The citrus seedlings were supplied by a local nursery in Penang, Malaysia, while M. koenigii seeds were collected from wild plants in Penang, and planted in the nursery at the School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, Malaysia. The young seedlings of citrus and M. koenigii were planted in plastic bags (25 cm diameter and 35 cm high) containing a 3:1:1 mixture of podsolic, compost, and manure, respectively. Each plant was fertilized on fortnightly basis with a half-teaspoonful of artificial fertilizer and 100 g manure.

The insect. Larvae of P. polytes were collected in July 2005 from citrus trees at the USM main campus in Penang. The collected larvae were reared in the laboratory on Citrus microcarpa to avoid potentially confounding effect of dietary history on host plant preference. The larvae were placed in a screen cage measuring 50 × 50 × 50 cm and were maintained at 24–26 °C, 60–85% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of L12:D12, until emergence. The emerged P. polytes adults were transferred to a field cage (2 × 2 × 2 m) to facilitate mating and oviposition. Flowers of Ixora sp. collected from the plants at USM campus were supplied as food for the caged adult P. polytes. The flowers contained in a glass jar filled with water were sprayed with 10% sucrose solution twice daily to ensure sufficient provision of nectar and placed in the cage; they were replaced with fresh flowers every three days.

Oviposition preference. Four plastic bags with each containing one seedling (50–60 cm high) of the four host plant species were placed opposite to each other in an experimental cage measuring 2 × 2 × 2 m. The plants were positioned one meter apart and any one plant was at least 50 cm away from the wall of the cage. Two pairs (2 males and 2 females) of newly emerged P. polytes were introduced into the cage. The number of eggs laid by the females on each host plant was recorded daily, until the females died. The host plants were replaced daily with fresh new plants. In this experiment, one cage represented one replication; the experiment was repeated 10 times (Greenberg et al. 2002; Nansen & Phillips 2003; Smyth et al. 2003).

Duration of immature stages. The eggs laid on each of the four host plants were recovered and were placed in four respective petri dishes (10 cm diameter), each dish layered with a wet tissue paper. Each petri dish contained 50 eggs. A plastic screen cover with a ventilation window made of fine wire (2 × 2 cm) was placed over each petri dish. The duration of the egg stage on each host plant was noted from the time of egg laying to hatching of first instar larva. Thirty newly hatched active larvae from each petri dish were selected and were reared individually on each of the four respective host plants serving as treatment. For this, a total of 120 cages (each 50 × 50 × 50 cm) were used, with 30 separate cages employed for each host plant. For example, for C. reticulata, 30 cages were used with each cage containing a newly hatched P. polytes larva placed on a young C. reticulata twig (two leaves) cut from a mother plant and placed in a bottle (one cm diameter, 10 cm high) filled with water. In this manner, newly hatched P. polytes larvae were individually reared on each of the other three host plants as well. As for M. koenigii, the larvae were provided with a young twig with four to five leaves. The leaves in each bottle were daily replaced with fresh leaves. Observations were made daily for the duration of larval stages and the data recorded until the larvae metamorphosed to the pupal stage. The duration of pupal stage was also recorded. These observations were replicated thirty times for each host plant.

Larval nutritional indices. This experiment was conducted using fifth instar P. polytes larvae. Newly moulted 5th instars were reared individually on a twig of respective host plant in a screen cage (50 × 50 × 50 cm). Weight of each larva and the host plant twig were recorded prior to releasing the larva on the twig. The host plant twig in the cage was placed in a bottle filled with water to maintain its vigour. The host plant twigs were replaced daily with fresh twigs from respective hosts. Unconsumed twig and the larval faeces were collected daily and dried in an oven at 60°C for seven days (Suwarno 1999). The experiment was continued until pupation of the larva. The prepupa was subsequently collected and dried in the oven at 60°C for seven days. All dry weights of the above components recorded for each host plant were used to calculate the nutritional indices for each host plant according to Slansky & Scriber (1985) as follows:

  • i) Relative Consumption Rate (RCR) = F/HT (gram/day)

  • ii) Relative Growth Rate (RGR) = G/HT (gram/day)

  • iii) Efficiency of Conversion of Digested food (ECD) = G/F-E × 100%

  • iv) Efficiency of Conversion of Ingested food (ECI) = G/F × 100%

  • v) Approximated Digestibility (AD) = F-E/F × 100%. where G = additional larval weight; F = weight of consumed food; E = faeces weight; H = mean of larval weight [(the initial weight + the final weight)/2]; and T = duration of fifth instar larva.

Nitrogen content of host plant leaves. One hundred grams young leaves of each of the four experimental host plants were analyzed in the laboratory for nitrogen content using the standard micro Kjeldahl method (Hwang & Feng 2004; Eaton et al. 2005).

Water content of host plant leaves. Twenty young leaves from each Citrus species and M. koenigii host plants were collected. All leaves of each species were separately weighed for wet weight (WW) and dried in an incubator at 80°C for 24 h and then weighed again for dry weight (DW). The water content of leaves of each species was calculated as percentage (WW — DW/WW) × 100% (Barros & Zucoloto 1999).

Data analysis. Oviposition preference of P. polytes for the host plants, its development (life stage) on the hosts and the larval nutritional indices related to the host plants were evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant F value was indicated, means associated with each variable of the host plant were further separated using the Tukey's test (Rao 1998). All data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 12 (Dytham 2003; Pallant 2005).

Table 1.

Values of nitrogen and water content (mean ± SE) in leaves of four different rutaceous host plants of Papilio polytes butterfly. Means in the same column followed by a different letters are significantly different (P < 0.01; Tukey's test). All n = 3.

t01_203.gif

Fig. 1.

Mean number of Papilio polytes eggs laid on leaves (L), stems (S), and pots (P) and on total plant, including pots (L+S+P) of host plants. Means accompanied by a different letters are significantly different (P < 0.01; Tukey's test).

f01_203.jpg

Results

Nitrogen and water content of host plants. The nitrogen as well as water content in the leaves of M. koenigii were the lowest and significantly different (F3,8 = 7.198, P < 0.01) from all three Citrus spp. analyzed. Nitrogen content in the leaves of C. reticulata was the highest and significantly different from the other two citrus species; however, the water content in the leaves of all three citrus species was somewhat similar (Table 1).

Oviposition preference. The number of eggs laid on C. reticulata was found to be the highest and significantly different (P < 0.01) from the numbers laid on C. hystrix and M. koenigii, but not significantly different from the numbers laid on C. aurantifolia. Between C. hystrix and M. koenigii, the former host plant was preferred by P. polytes as significantly more (F3,36 = 155.70, P < 0.01) eggs were laid on C. hystrix. Leaves were a preferred site for egg deposition as more eggs were observed on leaves of all host plants, whereas relatively small numbers were laid on the stems, and those deposited on the pots were negligible (Fig. 1). Among the host plants, the number of eggs on the leaves and stems of C. reticulata were the highest and significantly different (Fleaves = 160.04, df = 3,36, P < 0.01; Fstems = 40.04, df = 3.36, P < 0.01) from those laid on C. hystrix and M. koenigii. There was no significance difference (P > 0.05) between the numbers of eggs on the pots on all host plants (Fig. 1).

Table 2.

Duration (mean no. of days ± SE) for development of immature stages of Papilio polytes reared on four different rutaceous host plants. Means in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.01; Tukey's test). All n = 30.

t02_203.gif

Duration of larval and pupal stages. Papilio polytes required 28.40 to 29.73 days to complete their life cycle from egg to adult. All eggs hatched after three days. The larval development was completed in 14.63–16.13 days. There was a prepupal stage that lasted for only a day. The pupae took 9.6 to 10.13 days before adult emergence. Host plant had an effect on feeding period (Flarva = 9.887, df = 3,116, P < 0.01), pupal period (Fpupa = 6.145, df = 3,116, P < 0.01) and the duration of immature stages P. polytes (Ftotal = 4.25 df = 3,116, P < 0.01). The shortest immature period (egg until emergence, 28.40 ± 0.25 days) was recorded on C. reticulata. The duration of immature on C. reticulata was significantly shorter (P < 0.01) than on M. koenigii (29.73 ± 0.32 days), but not significantly different from those on other Citrus species. However, there was no significant difference in developmental time of immature stages among P. polytes reared on C. aurantifolia, C. hystrix and M. koenigii (Table 2).

Table 3.

Duration (mean ± SE) for Papilio polytes 5th instar larval development, its fecal dry weight and pupal dry weight, when fed on four different rutaceous host plants. Means in the same column followed by a different letters are significantly different (P < 0.01; Tukey's test). All n = 20.

t03_203.gif

Papilio polytes spent the longest larval period on M. koenigii, which was significantly longer compared to all other host plants. Among the citrus species, the larval developmental period on C. reticulata was the shortest, but on C. aurantifolia and C. hystrix there was no significant time difference. The duration of pupal stage of P. polytes on M. koenigii was significantly shorter than that on C. hystrix, but no significant difference was detected in time duration of pupal stage on C. aurantifolia and C. reticulata (Table 2).

Larval nutritional indices. The fifth larval stadium of P. polytes was the longest in term of developmental time and its fecal dry weight was the highest when reared on M. koenigii. Similarly, the duration of pupal stage on M. koenigii was the longest and significantly different from all three Citrus species (Table 3). In contrast, the pupal dry weight of P. polytes developed on M. koenigii was the lowest and significantly different from the other three host plants (Table 3).

Table 4 shows the values of various parameters of P. polytes larval nutritional indices on the four host plants. The relative consumption rate (RCR) of P. polytes reared on M. koenigii was the highest but the values of relative growth rate (RGR), approximate digestibility (AD), efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD), and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) were the lowest and significantly different compared with those on all citrus species. However, the approximate digestibility (AD) was not significantly different among the four host plants. All studied parameters of nutritional indices of P. polytes larvae reared on three citrus species were not significantly different from each other (Table 4).

Table 4.

Values of mean ± SE parameters of nutritional indices, relative consumption rate (RCR), relative growth rate (RGR), efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD), efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI), and approximated digestibility (AD) of 5th instar Papilio polytes reared on different host-plants. Means in the same column followed by a different letters are significantly different (P < 0.01; Tukey's test). All n = 20.

t04_203.gif

Discussion

Oviposition and larval developmental performance of herbivorous insects are determined by the nutritional content of the host plants selected by the female. This study showed that P. polytes females preferred to oviposit the most on C. reticulata compared to other host plants; M. koenigii was the least preferred host. In several earlier studies, the host plants which had higher nitrogen content were shown to be the most preferred hosts (Udayagiri & Mason 1995; Hwang & Feng 2001; Kid & Orr 2001; Wheeler 2003; Chen et al. 2004; Moreau et al. 2006). In the present study, results of leaf analysis revealed higher nitrogen and water levels in Citrus spp. than in M. koenigii. These underlying properties presumably attracted the female to prefer Citrus spp. over M. koenigii. Among the three Citrus species, C. reticulata had the highest nitrogen and water contents; consequently, the larval developmental period of P. polytes reared on C. reticulata was shorter than on C. aurantifolia and C. hysterix. The butterfly spent the longest larval developmental period on M. koenigii.

The nitrogen content of leaves of M. koenigii was relatively lower (3.73%) than that of C. reticulata (4.52%), C. aurantifolia (4.37%) and C. hystrix (4.29%). Consequently, the developmental period of fifth instar larva of P. polytes reared on M. koenigii was relatively longer than those reared on C. aurantifolia, C. hystrix, and C. reticulata.

Many factors could have influenced the oviposition behavior of P. polytes on the host plants, such as the texture, nutrition and chemical compounds of the host plant leaves. Morphologically, the upper surface of Citrus spp. leaves was smoother than M. koenigii leaf. However, nutritional and chemical contents of the host plants have been reported to be more important for purposes of oviposition and food preference by adult female butterfly and its larvae (Portillo et al. 1996; Barros & Zucoloto 1999; Ulmer et al. 1996; Smyth et al. 2003; Chen et al. 2004). In several laboratory experiments, the nitrogen and water contents of the leaf were found to be useful for prediction of upper limits of larval developmental performance (Scriber & Slansky 1981; Simpson & Simpson 1990; Ojeda-Avila et al. 2003). For instance, the nutrient content of the host plant—especially protein—has been reported to determine growth and larval performance of several insects, such as Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) (Ojeda-Avila et al. 2003), Oxyops vitiosa (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Wheeler 2003), Pieris rapae crucivora and P. candida candida (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) (Chen et al. 2004) and Orius albidipennis (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) (Groenteman et al. 2006), on their respective host plants.

Besides nutrient contents, Nakayama & Honda (2004) found that contact chemical stimuli from the host plants play the decisive role at the final step of egg laying process. The compound trans-4-hydroxy-N-methyl-L-proline and 2-C-methylerythronic acid have been identified as oviposition stimulants for P. polytes from the host plant, Toddalia asiatica. Meanwhile, a compound identified as trigonelline (N-methylpyridine-3-carboxylic acid) from Murraya paniculata, exhibited moderate oviposition deterrence to female P. polytes.

In many Papilio butterflies, extreme synergism of multiple components has been reported to feature in their stimulatory system of oviposition (e.g., Nishida et al. 1990; Ohsugi et al. 1991; Nishida 1995; Ono et al. 2000a, b; Nakayama et al. 2002, 2003; Nakayama & Honda 2004). Nakayama et al. (2003) found that oviposition response of P. polytes to a 5% concentration of the chemical compound, trans-4-hydroxy-N-methyl-L-proline (HMP) from Toddalia asiatica, was 34.8%; this response increased to 70.8% even at much lower concentration (0.25%) of HMP after the addition of an equivalent amount of acidic fraction from the same host, although 2-C-methyl-D-erythronic acid (MEA), isolated from acidic fraction of T. asiatica was almost inactive in itself (response below 10%). The combination of higher and lower amounts of HMP and MEA (0.4% and 0.1%, respectively) strongly stimulated oviposition by females of P. polytes to 95.3% response. The results suggested that P. polytes females make use of at least two simple compounds as the crucial chemical cues in recognizing T. asiatica as a host.

During this investigation, the lowest oviposition preference of female of P. polytes was on M. koenigii. This condition may be attributed to the presence of some chemical compound that could act as oviposition deterrents. In an earlier study, Nakayama & Honda (2004) found that trigonelline, a chemical compound isolated from Murraya paniculata foliage was responsible for the avoidance of M. paniculata by P. polytes females. Interestingly, although trigonelline deterred egg-laying process, the compound had no inhibitory effects on larval feeding. It is likely that M. koenigii contains this compound, which makes it less preferred by the ovipositing P. polytes.

The oviposition preference of P. polytes in the present study was indicated by placement of offspring by the female on the most suitable host plant. The larvae of P. polytes reared on all three Citrus spp. performed much better in term of development than those on M. koenigii. The dry weights of pupae developing on Citrus spp. were higher than the pupa developed on M. koenigii and this probably was a consequence of higher nitrogen content of the Citrus host plants compare to M. koenigii. It was observed earlier in Taiwan that the pupal weight of Daphnis nerii L. (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) from the larvae fed on periwinkle Madagascar (Chatharanthus roseus) containing 3.86% nitrogen was significantly higher than those fed on yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana) that contained 2.44% nitrogen (Hwang & Feng 2001). Wheeler (2003) found that the biomass of the prepupa, pupa, and adult of Oxyops vitiosa (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) was greater when fed on leaves that were fertilized with high N2 fertilizers compared to the unfertilized leaves with N2.

The water and protein contents of the host plant are extremely important to herbivore insects. Low amount of water and protein will result in low values of RGR, ECD and ECI, reflecting poor growth, and reduced efficiencies of digestion and ingestion, respectively. As observed in M. koenigii in the present study, the values of RGR, ECD and ECI were the lowest and correlated to its lower water and protein contents, compared to the three Citrus species. Scriber & Slansky (1981) reporting on the performance of Papilio polyxenes on several Umbeliferae hosts showed that it was closely paralleled to the nitrogen and water contents (2.0–4.5% and 66–89%, respectively) of the host leaves with an extremely strong correlation between ECI and leaf nitrogen. Furthermore, Barros & Zucoloto (1999) found that the pupal weight, ECD and ECI of Ascia monuste (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) larva living on Brassica oleracea (4.58 % nitrogen) were higher than those feeding on Brassica juncea (3.13 % nitrogen).

The value of ECI is strongly influenced by nitrogen content of the host plant because nitrogen is efficiently converted into body tissue of the larva. Low value of ECI is mainly due to decrease of ECD rather than AD because ECI and ECD are closely related to growth. Low nitrogen content in the food results in increase of RCR which consequently decreases the ECI. Furthermore, AD and ECD have also been found to vary inversely on the same food under different regimes of deprivation, but these results are confounded by differences in RCR (Simpson & Simpson 1990).

Papilio polytes larvae developing on M. koenigii took more food (higher RCR) than those reared on the three Citrus spp. host plants. The fifth larval stadium developmental time was longer; consequently the fecal dry weight was also heavier on M. koenigii. In contrast, the pupal dry weight was the lowest on M. koenigii compared with the other three Citrus spp. plant hosts. In a study with Tyria jacobaeae (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), Tinney et al. (1998) found that the larval development time was negatively correlated to plant nitrogen content, whereas the larval weight, growth rate, and pupal weight were positively correlated to plant nitrogen content. Henriksson et al. (2003) also reported that low concentrations of water and nitrogen were the main factors reducing pupal mass of Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae).

More food intake (RCR) does not automatically increase the RGR because other factors, such as nutrient contents especially protein and water content contribute to the RGR. For example, the consumption rate of O. vitrosa larvae feeding on Melaleuca quinquenervia receiving low dose of fertilizer increased compared with the larvae feeding on M. quinquenervia receiving the higher dose of the fertilizer, but the biomass of pupae and adults on lower dose fertilizer was lower (Wheeler 2003). The digestion of food (AD, ECI, and ECD) also strongly affects the RGR. Ingested nutrients must meet an insect's requirement for growth and other metabolic processes. In this relationship, the amount of nutrients allocated to tissue growth and storage represents the growth target, and the intake targets is the amount the insect must consume in order to meet its growth and metabolic needs (Simpson & Raubenheimer 1995 cit. Telang et al. 2001). Wheeler (2003) also found that larvae fed on leaves from highly fertilized plants converted absorbed food more efficiently to insect biomass than those fed on less fertilized plants.

The P. polytes larval AD values on all four host plants in the present study were not significantly different from each other. It was assumed that all these host plants were equally suitable for the larval development and none of them has chemical compound that could obstruct the digestive process. Scriber & Slansky (1981) reported that the value of AD was lower in the presence of higher content of fiber, lignin, tannin, waxes or silica. The decline of AD especially for leaf chewers is often associated with less selective feeding by later instars. Summarizing all nutrition indices Scriber & Slansky (1981) suggest that: RGR = RCR × ECI and ECI = AD × ECD.

In summary, this study has shown a positive relationship between oviposition preference and larval developmental performance of P. polytes. The host plant oviposition preference hierarchy of P. polytes corresponds to nutritive value of the potential host plant selected for oviposition. Larval developmental performance was better when fed on plants (Citrus spp.) with higher nutritive values than those fed on lower nutritive value (M. koenigii); the hierarchy of oviposition preference of P. polytes on the studied host plants was C. reticulataC. aurantifolia > C. hystrix > M. koenigii.

Acknowledgements

Gratitude is expressed to the Dean of School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, for providing equipment and field and laboratory facilities. We also thank Mr. Syanmugam for assisting in maintenance of host plants used in various experiments. This research was supported by USM Short-Term Research Grant No. 304/PBIOLOGI/636114.

Literature Cited

1.

C. A. Backer & R. C. Van den Brink Jr . 1965. Flora of Java. Vol. 2. N.V.P. Noordhoff, Groningen. Google Scholar

2.

H. C. H. Barros & F. S. Zucoloto . 1999. Performance and host preference of Ascia monuste (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Journal of Insect Physiology 45: 7–14. Google Scholar

3.

M. Berdegue , S. T. Reitz , & J. T. Trumble . 1998. Host plant selection and development in Spodoptera exigua: do mother and offspring know best?. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 89: 57–64. Google Scholar

4.

E. A. Bernays & R. F. Chapman . 1994. Host-plant selection by phytopagous insects. Chapman & Hall. New York. Google Scholar

5.

P. D. Catta-Preta & F. S. Zucoloto . 2003. Oviposition behavior and performance aspects of Ascia monuste (Godart, 1919) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 47 (2): 169–174. Google Scholar

6.

Y-Z. Chen , L. Lin , C-W. Wang , C-C. Yeh , & S-Y. Hwang . 2004. Response of two Pieris (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) species to fertilization of a host plant. Zoological Studies 43 (4): 778–786. Google Scholar

7.

A. S. Corbet & H. M. Pendlebury . 1992. The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. Fourth Edition. Malayan Nature Society. Kuala Lumpur. Google Scholar

8.

C. Dytham 2003. Choosing and using statistics. A biologist's guide. Second edition. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford. Google Scholar

9.

A. D. Eaton , L. S. Clesceri , E. W. Rice , & A. E. Greenberg . 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edition. American Public Health Association 800 I Street, New York, Washington. Google Scholar

10.

M. L. Forister 2004. Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies. Ecological Entomology 29: 264–272. Google Scholar

11.

S. M. Greenberg , T. W. Sappington , M. Setamou , & T. X. Liu . 2002. Beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host plant preferences for oviposition. Environmental Entomology 31 (1): 142–148. Google Scholar

12.

R. Groenteman , M. Guershon , & M. Coll . 2006. Effect of leaf nitrogen content on oviposition site selection, offspring performance and intraspecific interaction in an omnivorous bug. Ecological Entomology 31: 155–161. Google Scholar

13.

J. Henriksson , E. Haukioja , V. Ossipov , S. Ossipov , S. Sillanpaa , L. Kapari , & K. Pihlaja . 2003. Effects of host shading on consumption and growth of the geometrid Epirrita autumnata: interactive roles of water, primary and secondary compounds. Oikos 103: 3–16. Google Scholar

14.

S-Y. Hwang & T-Y. Feng . 2001. Feeding performance of Daphnis nerii on three Apocynaceae plant species. Formosan Entomology 21: 299–308. Google Scholar

15.

M. F. A. Jallow , M. Matsumura , & Y. Suzuki . 2001. Oviposition preference and reproductive performance of Japanese Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Applied Entomology Zoology 36 (4): 419–426. Google Scholar

16.

N. Janz & S. Nylin . 1997. The role of female search behaviour in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B. 264: 701–707. Google Scholar

17.

K. A. Kidd & D. B. Orr . 2001. Comparative feeding and development of Pseudoplusia includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on kudzu and soybean foliage. Annals Entomological Society America 94 (2): 219–225. Google Scholar

18.

J. Moreau , B. Berney , & D. Thiery . 2006. Assessing larval food quality for phytophagous insects: are the facts as simple as they appear? Functional Ecology 20: 592–600. Google Scholar

19.

T. Nakayama & K. Honda . 2004. Chemical basis for differential acceptance of two sympatric rutaceous plants by ovipositing females of a swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polytes (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Chemoecology 14: 199–205. Google Scholar

20.

T. Nakayama , K. Honda , H. Omura , & N. Hayashi . 2002. Chemical mediation of differential oviposition and larval survival on rutaceous plant in a swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polytes. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 105: 35–42. Google Scholar

21.

T. Nakayama , K. Honda , H. Omura , & N. Hayashi . 2003. Oviposition stimulants for the tropical swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polytes, feeding on a rutaceous plant, Toddalia asiatica. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29 (7): 1621–1634. Google Scholar

22.

C. Nansen & T. W. Philips . 2003. Ovipositional responses of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to oils. Annals Entomological Society America 96 (4): 524–531. Google Scholar

23.

R. Nishida 1995. Oviposition stimulants of swallowtail butterflies, pp. 18–25. In : J.M. Scriber Y. Tsubaki & R.C. Lederhouse (eds). Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientific Publishers. Gainesville. Google Scholar

24.

R. Nishida , T. Ohsugi , H. Fukami , & S. Nakajima . 1990. Oviposition deterrent of rutaceae-feeding swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xunthus, from a non-host rutaceous plant, Oryxa japonica. Agriculture Biological Chemistry 54: 1265–1270. Google Scholar

25.

S. Nylin & N. Janz . 1993. Oviposition preference and larval perfor mance in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): the choice between bad and worse. Ecological Entomology 18: 394–398. Google Scholar

26.

S. Nylin & N. Janz . 1996. Host plant preference in the comma butterfly (Polygonia c-album): do parent and offspring agree?. Ecoscience 3: 285–289. Google Scholar

27.

T. Ohsugi , R. Nishida , & H. Fukami . 1991. Multi-component system of oviposition stimulant for a Rutaceae-feeding swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xunthus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Applied Entomology Zoology 26: 29–40. Google Scholar

28.

H. Ono , R. Nishida , & Y. Kuwahara . 2000a. Oviposition stimulant for a rutaceae-feeding swallowtail butterfly, Papilio bianor (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): Hydroxycinnamic acid derivative from Oryxa japonica. Applied Entomology Zoology 35: 119–123. Google Scholar

29.

T. Ojeda-Avila , H. A. Woods , & R. A. Raguso . 2003. Effect of dietary variation on growth, composition, and maturation of Manduca sexta (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera). Journal of Insect Physiology. 49 (4): 293–306. Google Scholar

30.

J. Pallant 2005. SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysing using SPSS for Windows (version 12). Second edition. Allen & Unwin, New South Wales. Google Scholar

31.

C. M. Penz & A. M. Araujo . 1990. Interaction between Papilio hectorides (Papilionidae) and four host plants (Piperaceae, Rutaceae) in a southern Brazilian population. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 29: 161–171. Google Scholar

32.

H. E. Portillo , H. N. Pitre , D. H. Meckenstock , & K. T. Andrews . 1996. Feeding preference of neonates and late instar larvae of lepidopterous pest complex (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on sorghum, maize and noncrop vegetation in Honduras. Environmental Entomology 25 (3): 589–598. Google Scholar

33.

P. V. Rao 1998. Statistical research methods in the life science. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. California. 889 pp. Google Scholar

34.

J. M. Scriber & F. Slansky Jr . 1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Reviews Entomology 26: 183–211. Google Scholar

35.

S. J. Simpson & C. L. Simpson . 1990. The mechanism of nutritional compensation by phytophagous insects. pp 111–160. In E.A. Bernays (ed). Insect-plant Interaction Vol. 2. RCR Press, Florida. Google Scholar

36.

M. C. Singer 1984. Butterfly-hostplant relationship: host quality, adult choice, and larval success, pp. 81–88, In : R. I. Vane-Wright & P. R. Ackery (eds.). The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

37.

F. Slansky Jr. & J. M. Scriber . 1985. Food consumption and utilization, pp. 87–163. In : G. A. Kerkut & L. I. Gilbert (eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

38.

R. R. Smyth , M. P. Hoffmann , & A. M. Shelton . 2003. Effects of host plant phenology on oviposition preference of Crocidolomia pavonana (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Environmental Entomology 32(4): 756–764. Google Scholar

39.

Suwarno. 1999. The effect of combination of tyroxin and methoprene on larval period, silk gland, cocoon quality and nutrition indices of Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). 72 pp. M.Sc. thesis. Institute Technology of Bandung, Bandung. Google Scholar

40.

A. Telang , V. Booton , R. F. Chapman , & D. E. Wheeler . 2001. How female caterpillars accumulate their nutrient reserves. Journal of Insect Physiology 47: 1055–1064. Google Scholar

41.

G. W. Tinney , P. E. Hatcher , P. G. Ayres , N. D. Paul , & J. B. Whittaker . 1998. Inter- and intra-species differences in plants as hosts to Tyria Jacobaeae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 88: 137–145. Google Scholar

42.

S. Udayagiri & C. E. Mason . 1995. Host plant constituents as oviposition stimulants for generalist herbivore: European corn borer. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 76: 59–65. Google Scholar

43.

B. Ulmer , C. Gillott , & M. Erlandson . 1996. Oviposition preference of bertha armyworm Mamestra configurata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different crucifer cultivar and growth stages. Environmental Entomology 31 (6): 1135–1141. Google Scholar

44.

G. S. Wheeler 2003. Minimal increase in larval and adult performance of the biological control agent Oxyops vitiosa when fed Melaleuca quinquenervia leaves of different nitrogen levels. Biological Control 26: 109–116. Google Scholar
"Oviposition Preference and Nutritional Indices of Papilio polytes L. (Papilionidae) Larvae on Four Rutaceous (Sapindales: Rutaceae) Host Plants," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 64(4), 203-210, (1 December 2010). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.v64i4.a5
Received: 29 July 2009; Accepted: 23 March 2010; Published: 1 December 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top