Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2012 Fungi Feeding by the Agreeable Tiger Moth (Spilosoma congrua Walker) (Erebidae: Arctiinae)
David Moskowitz, Liti Haramaty
Author Affiliations +

Mycophagy in caterpillars from numerous moth families is well known, but for many species, including arctiines, basic information on fungal hosts and feeding behavior is lacking (Rawlins 1984; Wagner et al. 2008; D. Wagner pers. comm.). Although fungi provide nutrients (Jonsell & Norlander 2004; Rawlins 1984), availability of fruiting bodies can be unpredictable, and fungi are often only part of a polyphagous diet (Jonsel & Nordlander 2004).

Many species of caterpillars utilize chemical defenses against predators (Bowers 2009; Hristov & Conner 2005), and parasitoids (Bowers 2009), or use compounds produced de novo and/or secondary metabolites sequestered from host plants for reproductive functions (Hristov & Conner 2005; Rawlins 1984; Wagner 2005). Many sequestered compounds have been identified in arctiines (Hristov & Conner 2005; Wagner 2009), including Spilosoma congrua caterpillars which are highly effective at sequestering iridoid glycosides (Conner 2009; Hristov & Conner 2005). Other arctiines are known to sequester pyrrolizidine alkaloids (Woolley 2001), azoxyglycosides, lichen phenolics, biogenic amines, iridoid glycosides, pyrrolizidine glycosides and cardiac glycosides (Nishida 2002; Weller et al. 1999; Bowers 2009) A variety of bioactive secondary metabolites are widely produced by fungi (Zjawiony 2004; Mahmood 2010; Kukor & Martin 1987) and although there are few reports that insects sequester fungal toxins (Wicklow 1988), sequestration of fungal secondary compounds from lichens was shown in 24 lichen feeding lithosiines (Hesbacher et al. 1995). The purpose of this note is to document mycophagy in a primarily phytophagous arctiine, Spilosoma congrua Walker. Anecdotal and unpublished accounts, coupled with a single-confirmed published report indicate that this caterpillar occasionally feeds on fungi and maybe a useful candidate for exploring fungivory in Lepidoptera.

On 30 July 2010 at 22:15, we observed an Agreeable Tiger Moth caterpillar (Spilosoma congrua Walker) feeding on a small bracket fungus on a fallen log in a mature deciduous forest in Community Park, East Brunswick Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey (40.40887° N, 74.44360° W). The caterpillar was observed for approximately five minutes before being collected along with its host fungus. The identification of the caterpillar as Spilosoma congrua was confirmed by David Wagner (David Wagner pers. comm.).

The caterpillar we observed was feeding on the bracket polypore fungus Trichaptum biforme (Fr. in Kl.) Ryvarden (Polyporaceae). The fungus was also covered by two algal species, possibly a Chlorococcum (Meneghini) and another unidentified filamentous species (Dorothy Smullen pers. comm.). Our observations suggest that the caterpillar was feeding on the mushroom as well as the algae. The algal consumption may have been incidental to feeding on the mushroom but algivory has been reported in other Arctiidae (Moskowitz & Westphal 2002; Rawlins 1984; Robinson, et al. 2001; Wagner 2005). A short supplemental video of the feeding is available at  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaYkUqQmGG4.

Fig. 1.

Agreeable Tiger Moth caterpillar (Spilosoma congrua Walker) feeding on the bracket polypore fungus Trichaptum biforme (Fr. in Kl.) Ryvarden (Polyporaceae) in Community Park, East Brunswick Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey

f01_230.jpg

While the caterpillar was in captivity before succumbing to an unknown cause, it was fed fresh common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale F.H. Wigg.) leaves and white clover (Trifolium repens L.) leaves. It readily accepted the dandelion but not the clover.

Spilosoma congrua is typically described as phytophagous (Coveil 1984; Robinson, et al. 2001; Wagner 2005). There are also a few reports of the caterpillars feeding on mushrooms. We are aware of three published reports that note the caterpillar feeding on the mushroom Agaricus campestris L. (Tietz 1972; Handfield 1999; Robinson 2001). It is likely that these three accounts all originated from the same fungal host report noted in Thomas (1939) as originally reported by Beutenmüller (1890) and are also the source of many other general references to this species feeding on mushrooms. Unpublished reports, supported by photographs, also note feeding by Spilosoma congrua caterpillars on other mushrooms including Fomitopsis spraguei (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) (Fomitopsidaceae) (Woods and Woods 2008) and possibly on Boletes sp. (E. M. Fries) (Ramos 2006) (Boletaceae). Sargent (pers. comm.) also observed an unconfirmed S. congrua feeding on Boletus bicolor Peck. This caterpillar was also offered a Russula sp. (C.H. Persoon) (Russulaceae) but feeding on this host was sparse and inconclusive. A few other references note feeding by S. congrua on mushrooms but are more general without identification of the species; “feeding in mushrooms” (Beutenmüller 1890), “larva also bores in mushroom stems” (Zhang 1994) and “Attacks mushrooms but is rare” (Thomas 1939).

The paucity of reports of Spilosoma congrua feeding on fungi over the past century suggest that fungivory in this species must be only part of a broader generalist diet. It is possible that Spilosoma congrua utilizes fungi, when available, as a source of defensive chemicals and/or for reproductive purposes. Despite the limited number of accounts of fungivory in Spilosoma congrua, feeding trials with various fungi may be informative and help to understand the ability of the caterpillars to utilize these abundant food sources.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dorothy Smullen (Past President, New Jersey Mycological Association) for her help identifying the fungi and the algae; David Wagner (UCONN) for his help with arctiid ecology, references and review of the draft manuscript; Michael May (Rutgers University) for obtaining an obscure reference; Ted Sargent for sharing his observations and EcolSciences for the time and resources to prepare this manuscript and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions that improved this note. We also thank the East Brunswick Division of Parks and Recreation for access to the Dallenbach Natural Area at night.

Literature Cited

1.

W. Beutenmüller 1890. Catalogue of the Lepidoptera found within fifty miles of New York City, with their food-plants. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 3(5). 199–230. Google Scholar

2.

M. D. Bowers 2009. Chemical defenses in woolly bears: Sequestration and efficacy against predators and parasitoids, Pp. 83–101. In W. E. Conner (ed.), Tiger moths and wooly bears: Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. Oxford University Press, New York. Google Scholar

3.

C. V. Covell 1984. A field guide to the moths of eastern North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA. 496 pp. Google Scholar

4.

W. E. Conner 2009. Tiger moths and wooly bears: Behavior, ecology and evolution of the Arctiidae. Oxford University Press, New York. 323 pp. Google Scholar

5.

L. Handfield 1999. Les guides des papillons du Quebec. Broquet, Quebec, Canada. 982 pp. Google Scholar

6.

S. Hesbacher , I. Giez , G. Embacher , K. Fiedler , W. Max , A. Trawoger , R. Turk , O. Lange , & P. Proksch . 1995. Sequestration of lichen compounds by lichen-feeding members of the Arctiidae (Lepidoptera). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21(12): 2079–2089. Google Scholar

7.

N. Hristov & W. Conner . 2005. Effectiveness of tiger moth (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae) chemical defenses against an insectivorous bat (Eptesicus fuscus). Chemoecology 15: 105–113. Google Scholar

8.

M. Jonsell & G. Norlander . 2004. Host selection patterns in insects breeding in bracket fungi. Ecological Entomology 29(6): 697–705. Google Scholar

9.

J. J. Kukor & M. M. Martin 1987. Nutritional ecology of fungus feeding arthoropods. Pp. 791–814. In F. J. Slansky & J. G. Rodriquez (eds.), Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar

10.

Z. A. Mahmood , S. Ahmed , I. Azhar , M. Sualeh , M. Baig , & S. Zoha . 2010. Bioactive alkaloids produced by fungi: I. Updates on alkaloids from the species of the genera Boletus, Fusarium and Psilocybe. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 23(3): 349–357. Google Scholar

11.

D. Moskowitz & C. Westphal . 2002. Notes on the larval diet of the painted lichen moth Hypoprepia fucosa Hubner (Arctiidae: Lithosiinae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 56(4): 289– 290. Google Scholar

12.

R. Nishida 2002. Sequestration of defensive substances from plants by Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 47: 57–92. Google Scholar

13.

K. Ramos 2006. Electronic Resource retrieved from  http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=66378&sid=d58779fa a3a1a372430daa7c42facbe6 on 2 September, 2011. Google Scholar

14.

J. E. Rawlins 1984. Mycophagy in Lepidoptera. Chapter 15. Pp. 382–423. In Q. Wheeler & M. Blackwell (eds.), Fungus-Insect relationships. Perspectives in Ecology and Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York. 514 pp. Google Scholar

15.

G. S. Robinson , P. R. Ackery , G. W. Beccaloni , I. J Kitching & L.M. Hernandez . 2001. HOSTS — a database of the host plants of the world's Lepidoptera. Electronic resource. The Natural History Museum, London, England. Google Scholar

16.

C. Thomas 1939. The animals associated with edible fungi. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 47: 11–37. Google Scholar

17.

H. M. Tietz 1972. An index to the described life histories, early stages and hosts of the Macrolepidoptera of the continental United States and Canada. Vol. I and II. The Allyn Museum of Entomology, Sarasota, Florida. 1041 pp. Google Scholar

18.

D. Wagner 2005. Caterpillars of eastern North America. A guide to identification and natural history. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 512 pp. Google Scholar

19.

D. Wagner 2009. The immature stages: structure, function, behavior, and ecology Chapter 3. In W. E. Conner (ed.), Tiger moths and wooly bears: Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. Oxford University Press, New York. 323 pp. Google Scholar

20.

J. Rota Wagner D. & T. McCabe . 2008. Larva of Abablemma (Noctuidae) with notes on algivory and lichenivory in Macrolepidoptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101(1): 40–52. Google Scholar

21.

S. J. Weller , N. L. Jacobsen , & W. E. Conner . 1999. The evolution of chemical defences and mating systems in tiger moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Annals Entomol Soc Amer 93: 920–928. Google Scholar

22.

D. Wicklow 1988. Metabolites in the coevolution of fungal chemical defence systems. Chapter 8. Pp. 174–201. In K. A. Pirozynski & D. L. Hawksworth (eds.). Coevolution of fungi with plants and animals. Academic Press. Google Scholar

23.

P. Woods & N. Woods . 2008. Electronic Resource retrieved from  http://www.flickr.com/photos/peteandnoewoods/4369417688/ on 2 September, 2011. Google Scholar

24.

J. G. Woolley 2001. Plant alkaloids. Encyclopedia of life sciences. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. 11 pp. Electronic resource retrieved from  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com on 3 September, 2011. Google Scholar

25.

B-C. Zhang 1994. Index of economically important Lepidoptera. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

26.

J. K. Zjawiony , 2004. Biologically active compounds from Aphyllophorales (polypore) fungi, J. Nat. Prod. 67: 300–310. Google Scholar
David Moskowitz and Liti Haramaty "Fungi Feeding by the Agreeable Tiger Moth (Spilosoma congrua Walker) (Erebidae: Arctiinae)," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 66(4), 230-232, (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.v66i4.a8
Received: 6 October 2011; Accepted: 5 March 2012; Published: 1 December 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Agreeable Tiger Moth
fungivory
mycophagy
Spilosoma congrua
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top