Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2015 Anatomical Study on the Morphology of the Reproductive Systems and the Scale Brushes of Dioryctria rubella Hampson (Pyralidae, Phycitinae)
Li-Ping Wang, Bao-Zhong Ji, Zheng-Ping Zhao, Dan-Dan Cao
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The morphology of the reproductive systems and the coupling mechanism between the male and the female genitalia during copulation in Dioryctria rubella Hampson are described. Differing from those in other genera of Phycitinae moths, the corpus bursae possesses a well-developed signum, and the seminal duct does not exhibit a bulla seminalis, instead arising from the ventral surface of the corpus bursae. The ultrastructural observation shows that the spines on the inner surface of the ductus bursae and the cervix bursa are complementary to that of cornuti on the outer surface of vesica in position and direction, which elucidates the matching mechanism between the ductus bursae and the vesica. The male possesses well-developed scale brushes, which consist of six pairs of overlapped structures. Finally, the morphological differences of scale brushes between D. rubella and other Dioryctria species and related genera, and their function during copulation are discussed.

The pine shoot moth, Dioryctria rubella Hampson (Pyralidae), ranges over more than 20 provinces in China, and also occurs in Philippines, Japan, Russia and many European countries (Liang et al. 2011). The larva bores into the terminals and cones and thereby causes severe losses to the cones and seeds of Pinus massoniana, P. thunbergii, and P.taeda. It is quite difficult to control this insect pest because of its concealed foraging habit and overlapping generations, and methods for managing this insect, such as chemical, physical and biological control have been improved for over 30 years (Wu et al. 1986; Zhao et al. 1992; Liang et al. 2011). Knowledge of the morphology of the reproductive organs is prerequisite to studies of reproductive biology as well as to investigations of sex pheromone. Up to now, only a few studies on the morphology of reproductive systems have been reported in Pyralidae. Fatzinger (1970) detailed the internal reproductive systems of Dioryctria abietella. This is the only species of genus Dioryctria in which reproductive organs have been researched. Only eight other species of Pyralidae have had their reproductive morphology described (Srivastava & Srivastava 1959; Ye & Lu 1964; Song et al. 1965; Davis 1968; Beals & Berberet 1976; Miskmen et al. 1983; Jones et al. 1984; Liao 1988; Song et al. 2012). Although Wang & Song (1985) described briefly the genitalia morphology of this moth, the morphology of the reproductive systems of D. rubella has not been reported in detail before.

The scale brushes play an important role in releasing of the male sex pheromone in Lepidoptera (Birch et al. 1990). Simonsen & Roe (2009) described morphology of the scale brushes in male Phycitinae moths and discussed their phylogenetic value. In this paper, we describe the anatomical structures of male and female reproductive systems and the scale brushes of D. rubella in detail so as to supply some basic information for further studies on reproductive biology and the sex pheromone. Anatomical terminology follows Klots (1970) and Kristensen (2003).

Materials and Methods

Insect materials. The larvae and pupae were field-collected from April to October in 2013, from Sanjie, Anhui province, China. They were kept in the 15–20 mm long larval feeding tunnels, which were natural or man-made. The terminals were plugged into the matrix which can absorb water, and covered with glass tubes to avoid evaporation. Afterwards, the terminals were maintained at 25–28 degrees centigrade and about 62% RH on a 14:10 (L:D) cycle. The adults were collected and used as anatomical materials, they were either dissected instantly or fed with 0.5% honey water prior to study. All samples (30 females, 25 males) used for dissection were alive and unmated.

Anatomy. Moths were dissected in Ringer solution (6.5g NaCl, 0.14g KCl, 0.12g CaCl2, 0.2g NaHCO3, 0.01g NaH2PO4, and diluted with water to 1000ml) under the light microscope JN-JSZ6S. Meanwhile, the structures of reproductive systems were observed, measured and described. The photographs were captured using a computer and video camera mounted on a stereoscopic microscope, afterwards, figures were sketched according to the printed photographs. The dissecting structures were kept in stationary liquid (40% formaldehyde, 1.25ml glacial acetic acid, 10g chloral hydrate, and diluted with water to 100ml) for further observation.

Scanning electron microscopy. In order to investigate the relationship between the ductus bursae and the vesica, the ultrastructure in the inner surface of the ductus bursae were observed under the scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The ductus bursae was fixed in stationary liquid mentioned above for three weeks. Then, it was washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, for 20 mins, operated twice. Afterwards, the sample was dehydrated in a graded acetone, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% for 15 mins respectively, 100% for 20 mins and three times, then submitted to the critical point drying method, using superdry CO2. Finally, the sample was placed on metallic support, coated with a thin layer of gold and examined under the SEM FEI Quanta 200.

Results

Internal female reproductive organs. The internal female reproductive organs (Fig. 1) of D. rubella are composed of paired ovaries, a pair of lateral oviducts, one common oviduct, a genital chamber, the spermatheca along with its gland, and accessory glands.

The ovaries are secured within the abdomen by fine tracheae and some fat bodies, and normally loop back and forth 2 or 3 times within the abdomen. Each ovary is composed of 4 ovarioles, with an average length of 10.05 mm, which connects to the calyx of each lateral oviduct. The ovarioles fuse at their apex, contact closely throughout their length, and each of them is composed of a thin membranous tunica propria containing oocytes from 7 to 10, with newly emerged female containing the greater number.

Fig. 1.

Female reproductive system of D. rubella

f01_50.jpg

The common oviduct branches anteriorly into two lateral oviducts, with an average length of 0.90 mm, and slightly constricts before joining the genital chamber. The lateral oviduct expands into the base of ovarioles. The seminal duct and the spermathecal duct open into the anterior end of the genital chamber, while the common duct of the accessory glands opens into the dorsum of the posterior region of the genital chamber, slightly anterior of the opening to the rectum. The genital chamber terminates into a fleshy, telescopic ovipositor equipped with numerous sensory hairs and an ovipore.

The spermathecal duct, 1.25 mm long, convolutes into 10 small spiral loops. The convolute directions of the loops are reversed at the center of the spermathecal duct. The spermathecal chamber, which opens through the spermathecal duct, is an elongated sac. The spermathecal gland appears as a diverticulum of the spermathecal chamber and it terminates into 2 branches or not, depending on the individuals.

The common duct of the accessory gland attaches to the genital chamber and distally expands into an indistinctive common accessory gland reservoir. The separate accessory gland ducts attach to the common reservoir respectively. Each accessory gland also possesses a kidney-shaped reservoir near its base, the lateral accessory gland reservoir, with an average length of 0.96 mm. The anterior half of the accessory gland duct is finer than the posterior one. These reservoirs dilate or contract depending on the contents of the accessory glands. Each accessory gland arises from the anterior end of the lateral reservoir and is folded several times in the abdomen.

External female reproductive organs. The bursa copulatrix is a large, membranous organ (Fig. 1). The sclerotized ductus bursae, 2.68 mm in length, about eight times as long as width, is noticeably narrowed and musculated, anteriorly joins the cervix bursae and opens externally in the intersegmental cuticula of the 7th and 8th abdominal sternites through the ostium bursae. The membranous, U-shaped corpus bursae arise as a pouch from the cervix bursae. The internal surface armed with numerous spines, more than 500, about 0.18 mm long, which form a ring-like signum. The seminal duct arises from the ventral surface of the corpus bursae, coils three times at its anterior half near the corpus bursae, and slightly enlarges toward the posterior half near its junction with the genital chamber. There was not a bulla seminalis in the enlarged region, nor eggs found inside

The posterior opening of the genital chamber, the ovipore, is located below the anus. The papillae anales are derived from the 10th segment; they are weakly sclerotized and terminate in a nipple-shaped terminus. The papillae anales are covered with numerous long sensory hairs, and the hairs are 0.3 mm long in average. The margin of the papillae anales bears the posterior apophyses. There are a pair of lateral sclerites in the 8th abdominal segment, which bear a pair of anterior apophyses. Both of posterior and anterior apophyses are slightly sclerotized (Fig. 2).

Internal male reproductive organs. The internal male reproductive organs (Fig. 3) of D. rubella include two testes, a pair of vasa deferentia, the ductus ejaculatorius duplex, a ductus ejaculatorius simplex, and a pair of accessory glands.

The two testes are encased by a scrotum which appears as a thin, transparent membrane and form a complex testis. The complex testis is 1.04 mm in diameter, supported by tracheae and other viscera in the dorsal abdominal cavity between the 3rd and 4th segments, and easily distinguished by the brilliant claret-red of the scrotum. The paired vasa deferentia arise from the ventral surface of the testis and join to the ductus ejaculatorius duplex respectively. Each vas deferens possesses two seminal vesicles, which appear as two significant dilations, the anterior enlargement and posterior enlargement, each of them is 0.82 mm long. The anterior enlargements cross at their middle parts.

Fig. 2.

Terminal female abdominal segments of D. rubella.

f02_50.jpg

The ductus ejaculatorius duplex consists of 2 tubular organs, fusing at their posterior terminals to form the ductus ejaculatorius simplex and giving rise to the accessory glands at their anterior terminals. Each branch of the ductus ejaculatorius duplex receives one vas deferens, and the junctions are near the accessory glands and locate at the one third of ductus ejaculatorius duplex. The accessory glands are uniform, remain in close contact throughout their length and are intertwined among other organs within the abdominal cavity. Both of accessory glands are slightly club shaped at their terminals.

Fig. 3.

Male reproductive system of D. rubella.

f03_50.jpg

The anterior end of the tubular ductus ejaculatorius simplex connects to the ductus ejaculatorius duplex and posteriorly extends to the vesica. The ductus ejaculatorius simplex consists of 2 morphological areas, the primary segment and the cuticular segment. The primary segment appears as a thin, membranous tube, the cuticular segment is muscular area, differentiated by a lateral diverticulum and terminates into the phallus.

External male reproductive organs. The phallus is dorsolaterally supported by the transtilla with strip-typed muscles attaching to the margin of the 9th tergum, ventrally supported by the juxta. The phallus, which bears a caecum at the phallobase, is slender, strongly sclerotized tubular-shaped, and about seven times as long as wide. The ductus ejaculatorius simplex within the phallus combines with well-developed muscles fibers, convolutes into many spiral loops and joins to the base of vesica. These structures make the vesica possible to evert or invaginate freely during copulation. The terminal phallus is a tubular structure and the vesica is located in the lumen. Owing to its eversible and retractable abilities, the vesica, together with the phallus, constitute a telescopic structure.

The membranous vesica, which is invaginated in the lumen of the phallus and forms a true gonopore (Fig. 4b), the primary gonopore or aperture of the ductus ejaculatorius simplex, opens externally at the apex membranous vesica. The opening at the terminal phallus, which results from the invagination of vesica, is actually a false gonopore, the secondary gonopore or the phallotreme (Fig. 4a). The phallotreme disappears along with the evaginable vesica, and the surface of vesica exposes one large spine-like cornutus, with an average length of 0.78 mm (cornutus in Fig. 5), five to ten slender cornuti on the opposite side to the cornutus (cornuti in Fig. 5), and one to three sets of smaller straight cornuti (cornuti in Fig. 5) (with an average of 72), 0.28 mm long. The direction and position of cornuti vary with the position of vesica. When the vesica everts, the cornuti point to the phallobase (Fig. 5) . After the vesica invaginating, the cornuti point to the terminal phallus. The cornutus is surrounded by two flap-shaped muscular membranes (flap-shaped membranes in Fig. 5), and the membranes is surrounded by a layer of longitudinal muscle fibers.

Figs.. 4–6.

Male genital. 4. The schematic diagram of the phallus and the vesica in male D. rubella, a. The telescopic structure, b. The phallus with eversible vesica. 5. Eversion of vesica in male D. rubella. 6. Male genitalia of D. rubella (the phallus has not been sketched).

f04_50.jpg

When the vesica is in invagination (Fig. 4a), the phallus is about 2.74 mm long, thereinto the vesica is 4.86 mm long. The relative position of the eversible vesica and the phallus is shown in Fig. 4b, and the eversible vesica and the phallus are totally 4.57 mm in length. This is correlated with the telescopic structure of the phallus and the vesica.

The genital capsule of D. rubella is composed of the highly modified 9th and 10th abdominal segments (Fig. 6) . The anal tube passes beneath the 9th tergum. Uncus with rounded apex, which formed from the 10th segment, is attached to the mid-dorsal surface of the 9th tergum. Both sides of the uncus are parallel, with the sunken margin. The sclerotized gnathos is small pear-like with protruding cuspides, and connects to the sclerotized shield-shaped tegumen by the hardened, arcuate, and wide arms of both sides. The paired gnathos giving ventrolateral support to the anal tube. The diaphragma, a membranous ventral body wall behind the valve bases and ahead of the 10th segment sclerotizations, is the place where the anal tube and the phallus pass through. Most of the diaphragma derives from intersegmental membrane between the 9th and 10th segment (Klot 1970). The juxta, which is the most consistently developed diaphragma sclerotization, closely associated with the vinculum, round-shaped with two finger-type arms terminally equipped with fine hairs. Another kind of diaphragma sclerotization is transverse bridge, the transtillas, which is between the upper basal valve corners, extending above the phallus. The paired valves derive from the 9th segment (Ferro & Akre 1975), articulate with the vinculum along the posterior margin, and are armed with numerous setae, which are primarily serving to clasp the female abdominal apex during copulation (Kristensen 2003). The dorsal costa widens terminally and tapers to a long, sclerotized, falcate process, with the following three longitudinal ridges. The ventral valvula connected to the sacculus is membranous and bears many long setae. The sclerotized sacculus is located in the base-ventral of the valve and covered with shorter setae. The mediodorsal, hooked, sclerotized ampulla, ventrally connected to the terminal sacculus and dorsally associated with costa, also armed with numerous short setae. The vinculum is fused with the lateral margin of the 9th tergum. The vinculum joins the tegumen with its two arms, and ventral part sinks as a “V”.

Figs. 7–8.

The modified scale brushes from the 8th abdominal sternite of male D. rubella, ventral visual. 7. Overlapped sight. 8. Unfolded sight, with partly removed.

f07_50.jpg

Scale brushes in male adult. The scale brushes (Fig. 7) originate from the basal ridge of the strongly sclerotized and U-shaped the 8th sternite (Fig. 8), are composed of six pairs of overlapped structures. A bigger U-shaped, slightly sclerotized membrane is ventrally attached to the 8th sternite, and dorsolaterally attached to the male genitalia. The most dorsal components are a pair of dorsal scale tufts lateral to the 8th sternite, which are comprised by multiple very long piliform scales. Two pairs of long rods originate laterally from the base of the 8th sternite. The dorsal lateral rods are short and thick, while the ventral lateral rods are very long. The pseudoclaspers originate from the latero-basal portion of the 8th sternite, medially and posteriorly to the two pairs of lateral rods. These structures are composed of a thick shaft and head with a curved inner margin, a large downward pointed ventral hook, apical projection, medial prongs and lateral prongs. Ventral to the pseudoclaspers are a pair of large ventral scale brushes, which are laterally curved, originate from the centrodorsal of the 8th sternite. The scale pencils are a pair of long and narrow structures, loosely composed of a few scales, originating ventro-laterally to the ventral scale brushes.

The six pairs of scale brushes are equipped with many parallel and scaly ridges on surface, and they are flexible at the base, so that they can unfold. The scale brushes are covered with vesiculose membranes (Fig. 7).

Scanning electron microscopy of the inner wall of the ductus bursae. The inner wall of the cervix bursa and the ductus bursae are armed with some spines (Figs. 9–10), which are evenly distributed at one side of the base of the ductus bursae, with an average length of 10.0 µm (Fig. 10). The setae are unevenly distributed on the internal surface of ostium bursae (Fig. 11), one side is equiped with dense, long setae (Fig. 12), and the remainder is plicated muscles (Fig. 13). However, the spiculate surface and the setaceous surface are on opposite sides of the ductus bursae. The membranes, which attached to the ostium bursae are sags and crests, with some big humps surrounded by numerous small ones (Fig. 14). The remainder part of the ductus bursae is smooth, with longitudinal rumples (Fig. 15).

Figs. 9–15.

SEM micrographs of the inner surface of the ductus bursae. 9. Anterior end of the ductus bursae, showing spiculate surface (Scales 20 µm). 10. The inner wall of the cervix bursae (Scales 20 µm). 11. The ostium bursae (Scales 300 µm). 12. Dense, long setae of the ostium bursae (Scales 40 µm). 13. Plicated muscles of the ostium bursae (Scales 50 µm). 14. Membranes joining to the ostium bursae (Scales 10 µm). 15. Middle part of the ductus bursae (Scales 50 µm).

f09_50.jpg

Discussion

In general, the morphological characters of reproductive organs in D. rubella are similar to that of D. abietella and other Pyralidae species (Fatzinger 1970; Srivastava & Srivastava 1959; Ye & Lu 1964; Song et al. 1965; Davis 1968; Beals & Berberet 1976; Miskmen et al. 1983; Jones et al. 1984; Liao 1988; Song et al. 2012). However, there are some obvious differences, for example, the seminal duct of some species in the genus Passadenoides, Etielloides and Endotricha arises from corpus bursae near the junction of ductus bursae and corpus bursae (Ferris 2004; Ren & Li 2006; Sun & Li 2009). As for D. rubella and some other Dioryctria species, it arises from the ventral surface of the corpus bursae (Fatzinger 1970; Wang & Song 1985). Furthermore, no bulla seminalis such as described in D. abietella has been found in D. rubella, which seems to be acting as a pumping organ to assist movement of sperm through the seminal duct (Fatzinger 1970). Callahan & Cascio (1963) suggested that peristaltic movements of the seminal duct were also beneficial to sperm transmission in species which lack a bulla seminalis, and the seminal duct in D. rubella may function in this way.

D. rubella is of the U-shaped corpus bursae and the well-developed signum equipped with widespread, numerous spines. These are similar to some Dioryctria moths (Wang & Song 1985), and different from other species of the genus Endotricha, which the corpus bursae are round and the signum is indistinctive (Sun & Li 2009), the signum even absent in some Etielloides and Lipographis moths (Ren & Li 2006; Ferris 2012). The signum aids in retaining the spermatophore in the corpus bursae as the phallus is removed and the ultimate shape of the spermatophore is determined by the corpus bursae (Ferro & Akera 1975). The developed signum and the U-shaped corpus bursae may imply a strong retaining capacity and the U-shape of the spermatophore in D. rubella.

In D. rubella, the exact mating process has still not been reported. Some speculations may be inferred according to the morphology of external reproductive organs. There is a fine matching between the outer surface of vesica and the inner surface of the ductus bursae as well as the cervix bursae. The spines on the inner surface of the ductus bursae and the cervix bursae are complementary to the cornuti on the outer surface of vesica, moreover, the directions of spines and the cornuti are opposite to each other, which give the male a firm hold on the female during copulation and spermatophore formation (Ferro & Akera 1975; Callahan 1958). In ditrysian Lepidoptera, the phallus and the vesica insert into the ductus bursae and the cervix bursa during copulation, and D. rubella may copulate in the same way.

Male scent structures from abdomen of Pyralidae have many descriptive terms, such as coremata (Bradley 1968; Bradley 1969), corema (Wang & Song 1985 ), scale tufts (Mutuura & Munroe 1974; Ren & Li 2006), hair pencils (Sasaerila et al. 2003), culcita (Ren et al. 2011; Liu & Li 2012), scale brushes (Simonsen & Roe 2009). In this paper, we adopt the Simonsen s term and describe the scale brushes structure of D. rubella in detail. Simonsen & Roe (2009) examined structural morphology of scale brushes within the genus Dioryctria and two closely related genera by the scanning electron microscopy. Though variable in size and shape, the scale brushes of these species are clearly comprised by overlapped scales except for Pyla criddlella, which only has a pair latero-ventral scale tufts on the 8th sternite. The ultrastructures of the scale brushes are diversiform in species of genus Dioryctria and Sciota. There existed numerous pores on the cuticula of the scale brushes in Sciota termitalis, D. pseudotsugella and D. fordi, and some secretions were found around the pores (Simonsen & Roe 2009). They suggested that the scale brushes of these species might have excretory functions. The pores are neither found in D. rubella, nor in D. abietivorella, D. auranticella, and D. yiai, which may imply that the scale brushes only function to emit sex pheromone in these species. Whether the vesiculose membranes associated with the scale brushes in D. rubella have the excretory function of sex pheromone still need to be investigated.

In some Pyralidae species, sex pheromone is emitted from the scale brushes when the male is close to the female (Phelan & Baker 1990). During the study on the reproductive behavior of D. rubella, we found that some females ran after the males. Whether male sex pheromone exists in D. rubella still need to be further studied. Phelan & Baker (1990) suggested that male species equipped with well-developed scale brushes exhibited a more complex, interactive courtship sequence. It may imply a higher sequence of courtship behavior in D. rubella.

Acknowledgements

We owe our gratitude to our supervisor and members of our group. This study was supported by the following sources: the National Science and Technology Support Project (2012BAD19B0703), the Funding Project of Nanjing Municipal Construction Bureau & the Management Office of Dr. Sun Yat-Sens Mausoleum (200409), Nanjing Forestry University Southern Modern Forestry Collabotative Innovation Center and A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Literature Cited

1.

G. R. Beals & R. C. Berberet . 1976. Anatomy and histology of selected systems in larval and adult Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69:1105–1119. Google Scholar

2.

J. D. Bradley 1968. Descriptions of two new genera and species of Phycitinae associated with Hypsipyla robusta (Moore) on Meliaceae in Nigeria (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). B. Entomol. Res. 57:605–613. Google Scholar

3.

J. D. Bradley 1969. A new species of Dioryctria Zeller (Lep., Pyralidae) on Pinus kesiya in Assam, N.E. India. B. Entomol. Res. 59:125–127. Google Scholar

4.

M. C. Birch , G. M. Poppy , & T. C. Baker . 1990. Scents and eversible scent structures of male moths. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35:25–58. Google Scholar

5.

P. S. Callahan 1958. Serial morphology as a technique for determination of reproductive patterns in the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 51:413–428. Google Scholar

6.

P.S. Callahan & T. Cascio . 1963. Histology of the reproductive tracts and transmission of sperm in the Corn Earworm, Heliothis zea. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 56:535–556. Google Scholar

7.

F. M. Davis 1968. Morphology of the reproductive systems of the southwestern corn borer, Diatraea grandiosella. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61:1143–1147. Google Scholar

8.

C. W. Fatzinger 1970. Morphology of the reproductive organs of Dioryctria abietella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae (Phycitinae)). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63:1256–1261. Google Scholar

9.

C. D. Ferris 2004. A new species of Passadenoides Neunzig from Wyoming and New Mexico (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae : Phycitinae). Zootaxa. 705:1–8. Google Scholar

10.

C. D. Ferris 2012. A new Phycitine species from New Mexico (Pyraloidea: Pyralidae: Phycitine). J. Lepid. Soc. 66:165–167. Google Scholar

11.

D. N. Ferro & R. D. Akera . 1975. Reproductive morphology and mechanics of mating of the codling moth, Laspeyresia pomonella. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68:417–424. Google Scholar

12.

J. A. Jones , W. D. Guthrie , & T. A. Brindley . 1984. Postembryonic development of the reproductive system of male European corn borers, Ostrinia nubilatis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77:155–164. Google Scholar

13.

A. B. Klots 1970. Lepidoptera. Chapter. 20. Pp. 115–130. In: S. L. Tuxen (ed.). 1970. Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects. 2nd ed. Copenhagen. Google Scholar

14.

N. P. Kristensen 2003. Skeleton and muscles: adults. Pp. 100–120. In: N. P. Kristensen (ed.). Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies. Vol. 2. Morphology, physiology, and development. In: M. Fischer , Handbook of Zoolog IV (36). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York. Google Scholar

15.

J. S. Liang , G. Zhou , X. W. Dong , Y. J. Liu , X. L. Wang , & X. K. Luo . 2011. Research progress and countermeasures of Dioryctria rubella Hampson. For. Pest and Dis. 30:29–32. Google Scholar

16.

S. Y. Liao 1988. Morphology of the female reproductive system and development of ovary of Dioryctria abietella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Chinese Bull. Entomol. 25:363–365. Google Scholar

17.

J. Liu & H. Li . 2012. Taxonomic study of the genus Prorophora Ragonot, 1887 (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Phycitinae) in China, with description of a new species. Zookeys. 180:41–51. Google Scholar

18.

G.W. Miskmen , N. L. Rodriguez , & M. L. Nazario . 1983. Reproductive morphology and sperm transport facilitation and regulation in the female Sugarcane Borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76:248–252. Google Scholar

19.

A. Mutuura & E. Munroe . 1974. A new genus related to Dioryctria Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae), with definition of an additional species group in Dioryctria. Can. Entomol. 106:937–940. Google Scholar

20.

P. L. Phelan & T. C. Baker . 1990. Comparative study of courtship in twelve Phycitinae moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Insect Behav. 3:303–326. Google Scholar

21.

Y. D. Ren & H. H. Li . 2006. A taxonomic review of the genus Etielloides Shibuya (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae: Phycitinae) from China, with description of a new species. Orient. Insects. 40:135–144. Google Scholar

22.

Y. D. Ren , S. R. Liu , & H. H. Li . 2011. Review of the genus Merulempista Roesler, 1967 (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) from China, with description of two new species. Zookeys. 77:65–75. Google Scholar

23.

Y. Sasaerila , R. Gries , G. Gries , & Hardil . 2003. Sex pheromone components of male Tirathaba mundella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) . Chemoecology. 13:89–93. Google Scholar

24.

T. J. Simonsen & A. D. Roe . 2009. Phylogenetic utility and comparative morphology of the composite scale brushes in male Phycitinae moths (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Zoolo. Anz. 248:119–136. Google Scholar

25.

H. Y. Song , L. S. Zhou , & L. S. You . 1965. A preliminary study on the reproductive system of the paddy borer, Tryporyza incertulas (Walker). Acta Entomol. Sin. 14:285–296. Google Scholar

26.

J. Y. Song , Y. Hu , Q. Fu , & Y. L. Zheng . 2012. Anatomical Study on the structures of male reproductive system in Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).J. Zhejiang Agricul. Sci. 5:686–688. Google Scholar

27.

U. S. Srivastava & B. P. Srivastava . 1959. Observations on the post-embryonic development of the female reproductive organs in Leucinodes orbonalis Guen. (Lepidoptera: Pyraustidae) with notes on the homology in the two sexes. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 44:203–211. Google Scholar

28.

Y. L Sun & H. H. Li . 2009. One new species and two new species records of the genus Endotricha Zeller, 1847 from China (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). SHILAP Revta. lepid. 37:249–255. Google Scholar

29.

P. Y. Wang & S. M. Song . 1985. Revision of Chinese coneworms Dioryctria of the sylvestrella group (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Phyoitinae). Acta Entomol. Sin. 28:302–313. Google Scholar

30.

D. M. Wu , Z. R. Ding , J. R. Cui , & Y. H. Yah . 1986. The study of sex attractant of the pine tip moth Dioryctria rubella Hampson. Sci. Silv. Sin. 22:368–372. Google Scholar

31.

Y. L. Ye & J. R. Lu . 1964. Internal reproductive organs and the structure of spermatophore in Pyrausta nubilalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Chinese Bull. Entomol. 4:152–154. Google Scholar

32.

J. N. Zhao , S. Chen , & H. Huang . 1992. Studies on occurrence and methods of control of Dioryctria rubella Hampson (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Sci. Silv. Sin. 28:131–137. Google Scholar
Li-Ping Wang, Bao-Zhong Ji, Zheng-Ping Zhao, and Dan-Dan Cao "Anatomical Study on the Morphology of the Reproductive Systems and the Scale Brushes of Dioryctria rubella Hampson (Pyralidae, Phycitinae)," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 69(1), 50-57, (1 March 2015). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.69i1.a3
Received: 26 May 2014; Accepted: 29 August 2014; Published: 1 March 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Dioryctria rubella
reproductive system
scale brushes
ultrastructure
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top