Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2015 Status of Danaus plexippus Population in Arizona
Gail M. Morris, Christopher Kline, Scott M. Morris
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We report results of a ten year study to understand the distribution, breeding and migration of the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) in Arizona. We observed breeding and migratory monarch populations throughout the state and small overwintering aggregations in some locations. Migration occurred to known migration destinations in both California and Mexico. We found that the destination is not random. Wind significantly affects whether migrating monarchs are recovered. This study provides new insights into the breeding, overwintering and migratory strategies of Arizona monarchs.

While much is known about the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L., Nymphalidae) migration and breeding in the eastern portion of North America, little is documented about the southwest United States. Through tagging studies, Urquhart (1987) concluded there were two monarch populations in North America. He identified an extensive “Eastern Population” overwintering in Mexico and a “Western Population” that overwinters in California as well as a resident population in Florida. Urquhart maintained that the two populations are not geographically isolated and migrants from west and east of the Rocky Mountains both move through river valleys especially in Idaho and Montana, particularly along the Snake River tributaries. He noted that it was likely that genetic material was also exchanged in other mountain passes. Monarchs west of the Rocky Mountains migrate to the coastal sites of California extending in smaller numbers to Baja California in Mexico (Leong et al. 2004). Howard et al. (2010) demonstrated that small numbers of monarchs also spend the winter along the Gulf coast and in Texas. Many have questioned if eastern and western monarchs are one population (Brower 2005). Recent genetic studies of migrating eastern and western monarchs support the hypothesis that they may form one admixed population (Lyons et al. 2012).

An early map of fall monarch western migration movement by Urquhart (1960) noted that Arizona was in an area with no reported collections or recorded observations. Later, Urquhart (1977) reported that few adult monarch butterflies were ever collected in Arizona and New Mexico. R. Bailowitz's (pers. comm.) database for Arizona butterflies listed 150 monarch sightings from 13 August 1975 to 7 October 1984 primarily in Santa Cruz and Cochise counties in southeast Arizona but also in smaller numbers in other counties across the state (Appendix 1). Urquhart (1987) posted observations from Louis Schellbach at the Grand Canyon reporting monarchs moving south through the state during the migration. In particular Schellbach observed monarchs flying south along U. S. Hwy 89 from Salt Lake City, Utah between two mountain ranges. Urquhart (1987) also recorded limited sightings of monarchs in Flagstaff, Arizona and Ridgefield, Utah. Bailowitz and Brock (1991) noted that monarchs were most common “during its southward migration, in late summer and early fall in southeast Arizona.

Pyle (1996) travelled through Arizona during the fall migration while researching monarch movement and observed occasional monarchs in the southern part of the state flying to the south. R. Gilmore (pers. comm.) in October 1997 and again in 1998 noted monarchs flying north along the Colorado River at Lake Havasu then turning west along 1–40 at Needles and flying west through the mountain pass into California. He also observed hundreds of dead monarchs on the front grills of semi-trucks parked at a truck stop near Kingman after driving east through the same pass. The Arizona Sonora Desert Museum Migratory Pollinator Program on Monarch Butterflies (1999) research noted monarchs flying south along the San Pedro River through Guadalupe Canyon into Mexico. They also recorded monarchs flying south through Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge and Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in southern Arizona continuing south across the border. The observations of Bailowitz, Brock, Pyle and the Arizona Sonora Desert Museum researchers provided evidence that some western monarchs may migrate to the Mexican overwintering sites and that not all Western monarchs fly to overwintering sites on the west coast (Pyle 1999, Brower and Pyle 2004). Observations of Pyle and Dingle et al. (2005) suggested the possibility of monarch migration flyways in eastern Arizona along the New Mexico border and San Pedro River as well as along the Colorado River on the western border.

There have been conflicting reports regarding monarch breeding in Arizona. A map of eastern and western monarch populations in Journey North (2011) excluded most of Arizona as monarch breeding habitats. Stevens and Frey (2010) studied monarch host plants and climate patterns in western North America and noted Arizona had 22 species of Asclepias according to their model that included only extreme western Arizona. Of these, in Arizona only A. erosa, A. linaria, A. speciosa and A. tuberosa had growing seasons extending to August and September to produce a migratory generation. Earlier Urquhart (1960) mentioned briefly that Louis Schellbach found monarch larvae feeding on native milkweed at the Grand Canyon but provided few additional details. Funk (1968) reported 48 monarch larvae on Asclepias tuberosa, not native to the lower elevation of Yuma, as well as six pupae and three adults in Yuma in December 1965. He observed oviposition on 16 January 1966 as well as 18 and 27 February 1966, although copulation was not observed. Bailowitz and Brock (1991) noted monarchs were common in the Canelo Hills in southeast Arizona where they seemed to breed and reported the primary food plant as Asclepias asperula in the nearby Huachuca Mountains. J. Brock (pers. comm.) found a female ovipositing on Asclepias tuberosa along Turkey Creek in Canelo on 1 June 1994. He returned on 16 June 1994 and found monarch larvae. Brower and Pyle (2004) noted a report of 65 monarchs on 2 August 2003 along the San Pedro River between Hereford and Palominos near a stand of Asclepias subverticillata.

Monarchs were observed during the winter months in Yuma and Tucson. Funk (1968) observed monarch adults flying in the Yuma area on warm days in January 1966. Bailowitz and Brock (1991) reported limited monarch sightings during the winter in the Tucson area. Brower and Pyle (2004) reported small numbers of monarchs during the winter months in the Yuma area and along the Colorado River as well as Tucson.

Brower and Pyle (2004) hypothesized that occasional east to west influxes of eastern monarch butterflies increased the western population. In 1996 a poor spring remigration in the eastern United States from Mexico was followed by a large population increase in the western monarch population the following fall. This shift correlated with a documented major westward wind pattern shift in March and April also affecting the warbler migration. Winds could have displaced monarchs into New Mexico and Arizona aiding the western California overwintering population recovery. In this scenario Arizona could be a flyway.

A unique annual weather phenomena in Arizona is the summer monsoon season from 15 June to 30 September. The normal dominating westerly winds shift to prevailing winds blowing from the south, southeast and east to the north, northwest and west. It is a time of frequent to daily intense storm activity with locally heavy rainfall and damaging winds. During September the winds aloft are unstable as the season ebbs and flows, but intense storms are triggered and amplified by increased pacific hurricane remnants or cold fronts sweeping through the state. This results in severe storms over large areas of the desert, particularly southeast and central Arizona (National Weather Service 2008). This arrival of the annual monsoon triggers the time of greatest insect activity as well as plant growth around the state and is particularly pronounced in southeast Arizona (Bailowitz and Brock 1991).

The natural history of the monarch in Arizona is fragmented and incomplete. This paper presents field observations of a citizen science study and the results of a tagging program that addresses both monarch breeding and heretofore unknown migratory movements of the monarch butterfly in Arizona.

Materials and Methods

Early locations for exploration of Danaus plexippus absence/presence were based on data reports on the Southwest U.S./Northwest Mexico Leps list (1999) and personal communications with several butterfly enthusiasts in Arizona. Collections of Asclepias were researched in SEINet (Southwest Environmental Information Network 2014) database to locate possible breeding habitats. Opportunities for Citizen Scientists to participate in monitoring and tagging monarchs were publicized on the Boyce Thompson Arboretum website, newspaper articles and an occasional television feature. In 2010 the Southwest Monarch Study web site was developed to promote tagging and monitoring opportunities as well as a Facebook page. Permits and/or permissions to enter, monitor and tag on private or government properties were acquired. Data collection of monarchs tagged or monitored in a site where it was unclear whether proper landowner permission had been obtained or later denied were omitted.

Fig. 1.

Arizona climate zones. Blue indicates mountainous regions, Green, high desert and cool plateau highlands, Yellow, low and mid altitude desert.

f01_91.jpg

Tags were provided free of charge to volunteer citizen scientists to encourage active participation by the public. Tagging trips began in 2003 in southeast Arizona, known for the Sky Islands, rich in biologic diversity and density (Bailowitz and Brock 1991). Tags were purchased through Monarch Watch with Southwest Monarch Study contact information printed on the tags. The tags were made from a 2 mil all-weather white polyester facestock, paired with a 2 mil 3M adhesive layer. They were 8.89 mm in diameter and weigh less than 0.01g. From 2003 to 2011 the tags were blue; 2012 to 2014 the tags were white.

Sightings. The general public as Citizen Scientists was invited to monitor their own backyards and search natural areas for the presence of species of Asclepias, monarch breeding or migration activity and send in reports. In addition training workshops were held around the state. Sightings and photos of species of Asclepias, Danaus plexippus adults, eggs, larvae and pupae around Arizona and the Southwest were reported via email or posted to the Southwest Monarch Study Facebook page. Photo documentation was required for participants if they were new to monitoring to assure proper identification of adults or immatures due to the easy confusion with Danaus gilippus, queen butterflies, in the field. In addition, Southeast Arizona Butterfly Association (SEABA), Central Arizona Butterfly Association (CAzBA) and other butterfly lists were monitored for monarch sightings and reporters were contacted for details.

Breeding Habitats. Field trips were organized to investigate possible breeding habitats based on monarch sightings, Asclepias collections and reported riparian habitat. Protocols for identifying species of Asclepias were designed using herbarium and other resources (Kearney and Peebles, 1961, Woodson, 1954). For the purpose of this study we used the following divisions to identify elevations in Arizona: Low and Mid Altitude Desert (below 1,067 m) including Phoenix, Tucson, Lake Havasu, Parker and Yuma, High Altitude Desert and Cool Plateau Highlands (1,067 m to 1,829 m) including Prescott, Payson, Patagonia, Canelo and Sierra Vista, and Cold Mountainous Regions (above above 1,829 m) including Flagstaff, Pinetop/Lakeside, the Grand Canyon and Springerville/Eager (Davison, 1999) (Fig.1). When monarch breeding was noted, the location, date, weather conditions, species of Asclepias, and species of nectar in bloom were noted. In addition, mating, oviposition, eggs, larvae, pupae and adults were recorded. There were multiple visits to identify breeding habitats and to monitor field conditions.

Overwintering Monarchs. Monarch sightings during the winter months were recorded and possible habitats were explored for monarch absence/presence weekly. The number of adult monarchs, species of nectar, tree species used for night roosting, clustering, presence of milkweed as well as any copulation and presence of immatures were recorded for the season.

Field Methods: Tagging Wild Monarchs. Volunteer citizen scientists were trained in netting techniques, data collection and Danaus plexippus identification. Using a standard 46 to 61 cm (18 to 24 in.) deep insect net, live wild monarchs were captured for tagging, especially during summer and fall. Some monarchs were also captured by using fingers to lift them from flowers.

Date, name of tagger, tag number, and location, were recorded along with butterfly sex. The behavior at the time of tagging was recorded (such as nectaring including species of nectar plant if known), time of tagging and condition (freshly eclosed, excellent, good, fair, poor) were recorded on data sheets with room for additional comments. All were recorded as wild monarchs. After tagging, the butterflies were released. Any sightings of other Danaus plexippus already tagged in the field were recorded.

In addition to tagging, habitat conditions including species of Asclepias and nectar, approximate number of monarchs present, weather conditions and time of day were noted for further site analysis when possible. Starting in 2010, occasional sampling of monarchs was sent to Monarch Health at the University of Georgia for analysis of Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE) parasite load. Samples were tested for infection status by researchers at the University of Georgia associated with Project Monarch Health ( www.monarchparasites.org). Samples were collected from monarchs by pressing transparent tape against adult monarch abdomens. Samples were scored for the presence/absence of OE infection based on the presence of > 100 parasite spores per sample following Bartel et al. (2011).

Field Methods: Tagging Farm Monarchs. In addition to tagging wild caught monarchs, each fall from 2004 to 2012, the Desert Botanical Garden (DBG) in Phoenix tagged and released up to 50 farmed monarch butterflies a week with the public. DBG purchased these monarchs from a butterfly breeder farm in California and all activity was conducted under appropriate USDA permits DBG obtained. Other limited additional opportunities arose to tag farmed monarchs in other settings such as butterfly events sponsored by local nature centers or churches who purchased farmed monarchs for special celebrations. The sponsors of the events and the farms where they purchased the butterflies were responsible for legal compliance. All farmed monarch tagging was conducted by the same method employed for wild monarchs except they were recorded as farm monarchs. We tested some of the farm monarchs purchased for special events for Ophryocystis elektroscirrha with the same protocols as Wild Monarchs. The Southwest Monarch Study never purchased farmed monarchs or was involved in monarch breeding.

Table 1:

Asclepias Favored by Danaus plexippus by Climate Zone. H = Mountainous regions, M = High desert and cool plateau highlands, L = Low and mid altitude desert

t01_91.gif

Fig. 2.

Mating monarchs on Pinus ponderosa, near an Asclepias subverticillata meadow, Maswik Lodge, Grand Canyon National Park South Rim. Photo by Bob Morris.

f02_91.jpg

Peak Migration. The monarch migration is correlated with sun angle (sun's elevation above the horizon at solar noon) which is dependent on latitude and date. In the east, the leading edge of the monarch migration begins at a sun angle of 57° to 56° and ends at 47°, slowing then to a trickle in most years (O. R. Taylor pers. comm.). We compiled monarch sightings and tagging numbers to see if they increase during these periods. It has been observed that the peak migration occurs when the sun angle is 53° to 52° (Monarch Watch 2014). When tagged monarchs are recovered or sighted at overwintering sites in Mexico or California the sun angle at the time of tagging was determined using the NOAA Solar Calculator (2014) to compare with peak migration observations by latitude in the east.

Wind and Migration Destination. The shift in wind direction during the summer monsoon in Arizona, especially during the transitional period in September, could play a role in migration destination from southeast Arizona. Gibo and Pallett (1979) found that head winds, crosswinds, and tail winds affect monarch flight. The most efficient flight when favorable conditions are present for migrating monarchs is soaring by gliding in rising air thermals to conserve lipids. Lift can be generated by two means: thermal lift and slope lift. Thermal lift is frequently used by soaring birds as well as monarchs and occurs when air masses are heated by the sun. Slope lift occurs on the upwind side of mountain passes and occurs in hilly or mountainous terrain. While monarchs can soar and glide at many heights, the most common used is 300 m (Gibo 1981). Since southeast Arizona is most deeply affected by the moist monsoon wind shift and is also located in mountainous terrain we formulated two hypotheses regarding migration from this location.

Based on this information:

  1. We predicted that monarchs tagged on a single day in southeast Arizona will travel to the same migration destination (California or Mexico).

  2. We predicted that wind direction on the day of tagging in southeast Arizona affects whether a monarch was recovered.

Table 2:

Breeding nectar. H = Mountainous regions, M = High desert and cool plateau highlands, L = Low and mid altitude desert.

t02_91.gif

We obtained wind speed and direction from the National Weather Service in Tucson (Thompson 2014). The wind data were interpolated to 305 m (1000 ft) intervals above ground level (AGL), based on twice-daily weather balloon releases in Tucson. The balloons were tracked via GPS to calculate wind speed and direction, and altitude was calculated from the air pressure. We standardized to the 0000 h UTC (1700 h MST) sounding at 305 m (1,000 ft) AGL.

Results

Monarch Presence. Adult monarchs were reported in every month in some years in Arizona but at varying elevations. In warm winter years without a hard freeze (temperatures less than or equal to -2.7°C for two or more hours (NOAA, 2014)), monarchs were reported most commonly from September until mid-May in the lower desert elevations including Phoenix, Tucson, Yuma, Parker and Lake Havasu. In years with a hard freeze, monarch sightings plummeted until late March through May when a small number of monarch observations were reported. In the High Altitude Desert and Cool Plateau Highlands including Pine, Sedona, San Rafael Valley, Sierra Vista and Canelo, monarchs were reported in some years as early as the last week of March in the southeastern portion of the state but more commonly in July through October, sometimes longer with an extended favorable fall season. In the Cold Mountainous Regions including Flagstaff, the Grand Canyon and Springerville, monarchs were present from mid-June through September.

Breeding Habitats. Arizona has a variety of elevations providing diverse climates supporting many Asclepias species. Monarchs were seen ovipositing and eggs, larvae and pupae were observed on the following species of Asclepias in each plant climate zone. During the summer breeding season in the Cold Mountainous Regions of Arizona, Asclepias subverticillata was the primary host plant closely followed by Asclepias speciosa. In the High Altitude Desert and Cool Plateau Highlands elevations, Asclepias subverticillata was primary but other milkweeds were also utilized (Table 1). Evergreen milkweeds were host to mainly fall breeding monarchs in the Low and Mid Altitude Desert. In particular Asclepias subulata was heavily favored although Asclepias angustifolia was also used frequently in backyard gardens. Abundant summer monsoon rains triggered a second growing season in some years especially in the lower deserts. Eggs, immatures and monarch oviposition were frequently reported in the fall on Asclepias nyctaginifolia, Asclepias asperula and Asclepias erosa in addition to the evergreen milkweeds. There were no collections (SEINet 2015) or observations of Asclepias curassavica growing in roadside ditches or any other naturalized areas. This milkweed was limited to an irrigated garden specialty.

Fig. 3.

Monarch larva on Asclepias subulata, Chandler Environmental Center, Chandler, AZ, 28 September 2009 High temperature 38.8° C, Low temperature 17.7° C (Weather Underground). Photo by Gail Morris.

f03_91.jpg

Fig. 4.

Roosting Danaus plexippus and one Danaus gilippus, South Mountain, Phoenix, 11 November 2007. Photo by Tatsuyo Schultz.

f04_91.jpg

Table 3:

Clusters of migrating monarchs

t03_91.gif

Most breeding areas in Arizona hosted two to three generations (sometimes more) in the High Altitude Desert and Cool Plateau Highlands during the summer months, allowing the monarch population to expand substantially at these locations before the fall migration. In particular Elgin, Turkey Creek and the San Rafael Valley in southeast Arizona had the largest monarch populations in the state. By mid-September it was not unusual to find over 100 monarch adults present in a 0.5 km2 field along Turkey Creek as well as larvae and pupae. The greater Prescott area and Tonto Natural Bridge State Park in Pine also documented breeding in late July until September.

In the Cold Mountainous Regions monarchs usually successfully completed two generations before the fall migration. Monarchs were reported in Flagstaff at Buffalo Park with extensive fields of Asclepias subverticillata. Monarchs were recorded on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon flying out of the inner Canyon along Bright Angel Creek on the South Rim during July and August. Extensive oviposition, larvae and pupae were noted in low-lying, moist meadows filled with Asclepias subverticillata while breeding was documented in nearby Ponderosa Pines (Fig. 2). The White Mountains, including Pinetop/Lakeside, Springerville and Eager had abundant breeding primarily on Asclepias subverticillata and Asclepias speciosa in meadows and riparian areas. After the Wallow Fire in Springerville in the summer of 2011, monarchs were notably absent in July, but were present the second week of August and completed only one generation before leaving on their migration.

Fig. 5.

Locations of monarch sightings on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon between 23 October 2008 and 10 November 2008. Each red dot represents a GPS sighting. No monarchs were tagged in the park during this time period.

f05_91.jpg

While limited reports of spring breeding were noted in the Low and Mid Altitude Deserts, fall was the premier breeding season in Phoenix, Yuma, Lake Havasu, Kofa Mountains and Tucson. In the final days of August through early September monarchs returned into the area and they were breeding with heavy oviposition documented (Fig. 3). Temperatures in the lower desert can still reach 43°C or above in some years in early September and egg, larvae, and pupae demise have been documented in years with high temperatures. In years of warm fall temperatures both migrating and breeding monarchs were observed in late September and October. Some locations documented one to two generations.

Breeding Season Nectar. Asclepias spp. in bloom was the favored nectar for breeding monarchs at all elevations. Monarchs were also observed feeding on additional nectar plants commonly in season (Table 2), a variety of trees in bloom such as Prosopis velutina (Fabaceae), Velvet Mesquite, and Robinia neomexicana (Fabaceae), New Mexico Locust, in addition to other lesser nectar sources. Monarchs were opportunists when nectar sources were limited and were seen nectaring on invasive species such as Convolvulus arvensis (Convolvulaceae), Field Bindweed, and Tamarix chinensis (Tamaricaceae), Salt Cedar. In home gardens zinnias, cosmos, sunflowers, tithonia, coreopsis and asters were favored.

Migration Sightings. Small, loose clusters of monarchs during the migration were occasionally reported (Fig. 4) as well as multiple monarch movement during September through November (Table 3). In addition there were late sightings of monarch movement along rivers such 16 monarchs along the Colorado River through the Grand Canyon in November 2008 (Fig. 5), one monarch at the Hassayampa River Preserve near Wickenburg (elevation 610 m) on 23 November 2014, and three monarchs on the Agua Fria at Rock Springs (elevation 610 m) on 9 December 2014.

Table 4:

Fall migration nectar. H = Mountainous regions, M = High desert and cool plateau highlands, L = Low and mid altitude desert.

t04_91.gif

Migration Nectar. Monarchs were observed to favor, but were not limited to, fall blooming species of Asclepias in bloom as well as other nectar plants (Table 4). In home gardens, fall blooming zinnias, cosmos, sunflowers, tithonia, coreopsis, ageratum and asters were favored.

Table 5:

Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE) infection rates

t05_91.gif

Overwintering aggregations. Several small overwintering aggregations of 3 to 45 monarchs were found to spend the winter in the greater Phoenix area each year. Two sites were along the Salt River (Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area and Tempe Marsh) and one was at Desert Botanical Garden in Phoenix. The populations at Desert Botanical Garden and Tempe Marsh were decimated by a hard freeze of -2°C on 31 December 2010. A second hard freeze of -2°C occurred one month later on 2 February 2011. The monarch population at Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area was able to partially survive these conditions (Fig. 6). By weekly monitoring of nearby Asclepias subulata the Rio Salado overwintering monarchs appeared to be in diapause until early February (Fig. 7). In 2012 overwintering aggregations were also found at Singh Farm in Scottsdale. Adult monarchs were tagged and monitored weekly. We found both breeding monarchs and a small number of monarchs that lived for three months indicating the possibility of a mixed population of breeding and nonbreeding monarchs. During the warm winter of 2013, three monarchs overwintered at Boyce Thompson Arboretum in Superior (elevation 735 m) in Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) trees. One was tagged on 26 October 2013 and sighted flying in the area on 26 January 2014. In most years winters were too cold for monarch survival at this location.

Fig. 6.

Comparison of adult monarch sightings at three locations with overwintering monarchs pre and post freeze. A hard freeze occurred on 31 December 2010. Monarchs normally begin mating and dispersing early February.

f06_91.jpg

In warm winters without a hard freeze, small numbers of monarchs were reported in backyards in the greater Phoenix area, Tucson, and Yuma. In most years monarchs were also reported at the Arizona Sonora Desert Museum in Tucson. Trained docents tagged monarchs present at the museum. By the longevity of some tagged monarchs as well as photo documentation of others ovipositing, the monarchs appeared to be a mix of nonbreeding and breeding monarchs. The immature phase was as long as six to eight weeks in response to average night temperatures hovering near 1.6°C and low daytime temperatures. On warm days monarchs at Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area and Tempe Marsh nectared primarily on Baccharis salicifolia, as well as Bebbia juncea, Lycium spp. and Pluchea sericea when available and stayed primarily in Salix gooddingii but also Populus spp. trees at night. Monarchs at the Desert Botanical Garden and Arizona Sonora Desert Museum visited a variety of winter garden flowers in addition to Calliandra californica and Lycium spp.

Fig. 7.

Monarch Density. Monarch egg and larvae by instar, absence and presence at Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area, Phoenix, Arizona, with weekly monitoring of thirty-two Asclepias subulata plants.

f07_91.jpg

Small aggregations were also noted along the Colorado River from Parker to Lake Havasu including 125 monarchs found in Acacia salicina trees at Buckskin State Park in Parker along the Colorado on 8 November 2013. The following morning many flew south along the Colorado River. Later, 25 monarchs were found at the same location on 18 January 2014. One of approximately 60 monarchs sighted and later tagged on 27 October 2012 at Rotary Park in Lake Havasu along the Colorado River was spotted in the city of Lake Havasu on 17 February 2013, suggesting an overwintering population. Others tagged at the same time were observed flying north and a few also flew south along the Colorado River the following morning.

Ophryocystis elektroscirrha. We submitted 463 samples to Monarch Health at the University of George to test for Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE). Results for the submitted specimen analysis indicate low levels of Ophryocystis elektroscirrha in Arizona (Table 5). Test results were provided in three levels: 1 to 10 spores (Level 1), 11 to 100 spores (Level 2) and 101 and above spores (Level 3). Level 3 is where the infected monarch likely acquired the infection as a larva and is the primary point of comparison as a heavily infected monarch. In Arizona, the number of Level 3 infections dropped from 13% in 2010 to 0% in 2013 and 5% in 2014. The Canelo breeding habitat in southeast Arizona had the highest level of Level 3 infected monarchs. Overall, 449 wild monarchs sampled had a 4% Level 3 infection rate. Fourteen farm monarchs tested had a 29% rate.

Table 6:

Enumeration of recovered wild monarchs. Sun angle is the sun's elevation angle above the horizon at solar noon on the day of tagging, calculated with NOAA calculator  http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/grad/solcalc/. Single-letter tags are wild monarchs.

t06_91.gif

Water. Migrating monarchs were reported mainly along water sources, especially rivers. The Colorado River in particular was heavily favored as a migration flyway through the Grand Canyon as well as below Lake Havasu as were the Little Colorado, San Pedro, Santa Cruz, Verde, Gila, Hassayampa, Bill Williams and Salt Rivers. Breeding and migrating monarchs were frequently found in larger densities near (but not limited to) water, including cienegas, rivers and creeks (especially flood plains), washes, roadside ditches and irrigated gardens. During periods of low humidity monarchs were frequently found puddling in moist soils and in shallow creeks and streams (Fig. 8).

Tagged monarchs. A total of 12,088 monarchs were tagged between 2003 and 2014 by 384 individuals in 276 locations. This includes 7,809 wild monarchs and 4,279 farmed monarchs; 7,133 were males, 4,662 were females, and sex was not reported for 293. In addition to tagging sites, 134 unique sighting locations of monarch adults and/or immatures were reported (Fig. 9).

Recoveries of tagged monarchs. Recoveries at the overwintering sites in Mexico were reported to volunteers of Southwest Monarch Study, Monarch Watch and others. The campesinos who live at the overwintering sites and actually found the tags were paid 50 pesos (about five dollars) per tag. Most monarch recoveries in Mexico were based on tags that were found on dead monarchs at each location. Only one female monarch spotted at Kino Bay, Sonora, was a five sighting. Recoveries in California were all from five monarchs sighted or photographed by citizen observers.

Fig. 8.

Monarch drinking water from stream, Huachuca Mountains, 3 October 2012. Photo by Bob Herrmann.

f08_91.jpg

The total count of wild monarch recoveries was 15 in Mexico and 9 in California (Fig. 10a) (Table 6). In addition to the identified tagged monarchs, two blue Southwest Monarch Study tagged monarchs were spotted at Camp Pendleton in Oceanside, CA by David Marriott on 8 January 2009. However, despite repeated photographs, the tag numbers remained unreadable for these two tags. The number of recoveries in California varied by year:

  • 2008 (3; including 2 unidentified tags at Camp Pendleton)

  • 2009(0)

  • 2010(1)

  • 2011(0)

  • 2012(0)

  • 2013 (5; all tagged in the same week in southeast Arizona)

  • 2014 (2; tagged 2 days apart in southeast Arizona) There were 12 additional sightings in Arizona of wild tagged monarchs under 50 km from their tagging sites in Chandler, Canelo, Elgin, Gilbert, San Rafael Valley, Scottsdale, Springerville, and Tempe.

The total number of farm monarch recoveries was 5 in Mexico and 0 in California (Fig. 10b) (Table 7). One farmed monarch tagged at the Desert Botanical Garden in Phoenix flew northwest 34.3 km and was sighted in Sun City and later was re-sighted in Tonopah, 61.8 km to the southwest. There were 13 sightings of tagged farm monarchs from the Desert Botanical Gardens to the south and southeast under 50 km in Ahwatukee (3), Mesa (4), Chandler (3), and South Mountain (3).

From 2003 to 2011, the overall recovery rate was 1 recovery out of 564 monarchs tagged. The recovery rate nearly tripled for 2012 and 2013 becoming 1 recovery for every 198 monarchs tagged.

Wind and migration destination. Observation of data showed perfect concordance with our hypothesis that monarchs tagged in a single day in southeast Arizona would travel to the same overwintering location (Mexico or California). In every instance where multiple recovered monarchs were tagged on a single day, they all were recovered at the same location. This effect was statistically significant by Fishers Exact test with <0.05, allowing us to reject the null hypothesis that migration direction is random.

Our hypothesis was that wind direction on the day of tagging in southeast Arizona affects whether the monarch was recovered. Results are shown in (Table 8) (Fig. 11). We found wind direction does significantly affect whether the monarch was recovered by Fishers Exact test with p ≤ 0.05.

Peak Migration. The earliest two migrating monarchs recovered to date both had sun angles at the time of tagging of 64°. One was recovered at Ellwood Main in California, the other at El Rosario, Michoacan, Mexico (Fig. 12). Both monarchs were freshly eclosed and tagged in the San Rafael Valley in southeast Arizona on 7 September 2008 and 8 September 2013, respectively. Most of the recoveries of tagged monarchs in Mexico are in alignment with migration observations for latitude in the east. Most California recoveries occurred before the times observed in the east. We had one late recovery of a freshly eclosed monarch tagged in Chandler on 19 November 2011 that was sighted in Kino Bay, Sonora, Mexico on 14 December 2011 that had been tagged with a sun angle of 37°. When we averaged all the tagging over the life of the study there is a surge of monarchs tagged the first week of October (Fig. 13).

Fig. 9.

Locations of Monarch Tagging and Sighting. Each blue square represents the location where one or more monarchs was tagged. Each red circle represents the location where one or more monarch sightings have been reported.

f09_91.jpg

Figs. 10a & 10b.

Recovery Locations of Monarchs Tagged in Arizona, a, wild monarchs. b, farm monarchs. Letters next to each set of arrows individually identify the monarchs (Table 6; Table 7).

f10_91.jpg

Table 7:

Enumeration of recovered farm monarchs. Sun angle is the sun's elevation angle above the horizon at solar noon on the day of tagging, calculated with NOAA calculator  http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/grad/solcalc/. Two-letter tags are farm monarchs.

t07_91.gif

Discussion

Danaus plexippus was present and at times abundant in Arizona at different elevations throughout the year. Breeding populations were observed at all elevations seasonally and they utilized a variety of native species of Asclepias. Habitats were most numerous in riparian areas. Both adults and immatures were reported at all elevations. During the breeding season monarchs favored species of Asclepias for nectar as well as oviposition but also used other available nectar. We also identified migration nectar sources and learned D. plexippus favors riparian areas and rivers during their migration when available and sometimes were found puddling. Both breeding and migrating monarchs were frequently seen in city backyards and parks when Asclepias spp. and favored nectar were available. Backyard gardeners can help create rest stops for migration refueling.

The lower elevation deserts have small numbers of overwintering monarchs in warm winters without a hard freeze. They were recorded from 2009 onward every year and appear to be a regular occurrence. The largest aggregations were found at Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area in Phoenix and there were other small locations along the Salt and Colorado Rivers. Yuma, Phoenix, Lake Havasu, Parker and Tucson areas also reported winter monarch sightings. There were reports of limited monarch breeding during the winter but at other locations breeding was not evident. Native evergreen milkweeds were most common near these locations. With a record warm year in 2014 in Phoenix (National Weather Service 2015), especially in the fall, together with a general warming trend in recent years, it will be critical to monitor the effects on the overwintering numbers in the future.

Table 8.

Tags and recoveries from southeast Arizona, broken down by wind direction at 305 m AGL (1,000 ft) at 1200 h GMT (1700 h MST) on the day of tagging.

t01_91.gif

Fig. 11.

Wind Speed and Direction on Day of Tagging. Each black dot represents the wind speed and direction at 305 m (1,000 ft) AGL (above ground level) on a day on which one or more monarchs was tagged. Red dots represent the same data for the days on which one or more recovered monarch was tagged. The speed is proportional to the distance from the center. The circle represents 9 m/sec. The direction of the wind is from each marker to the center.

f11_91.jpg

Ophryocystis elektroscirrha levels were low in monarchs over the past five years in Arizona with an average rate of 4%. Monarchs were tested in breeding areas, during the migration, in overwintering aggregations and in backyard gardens throughout the year. While levels should continue to be monitored to detect a changing trend, current levels indicate this is not a serious threat to the monarch population at this time. Arizona has evergreen milkweeds utilized by the monarch population for both oviposition and nectaring, but they do not appear to contribute to a higher Ophryocystis elektroscirrha infection rate. Nor does the presence of Asclepias curassavica in occasional irrigated gardens. It is possible Arizona's high temperatures and low humidity limit the transmission of Ophryocystis elektroscirrha.

Fig. 12.

Recoveries by sun angle (sun's elevation angle above the horizon at solar noon) on the day of tagging. Recoveries in Mexico are represented by red triangles; California by blue circles. Vertical axis is sun angle in degrees. Horizontal axis is the tagging date. Dashed green lines indicate elevation of 46.5° and 56.5°, the nominal values for the migration.

f12_91.jpg

Fig. 13.

Counts of monarchs tagged by date, sum of all years. The counts are displayed as a seven day running average to remove the artifacts caused by day of week.

f13_91.jpg

Monarchs in Arizona migrate to known overwintering destinations in both Mexico and California while small numbers overwinter in the lower deserts in Phoenix, Tucson, Yuma, Parker and Lake Havasu. All the monarchs recovered in California were tagged in southeast Arizona near fields of abundant Asclepias subverticillata. Most of these early migrators appeared to be recently eclosed from local fields.

Winds play a significant role in the southeast Arizona monarch migration. When multiple monarchs were tagged at the same location and later recovered, they were always all found in California or all reported in Mexico, a significant finding. There were several sets of two or three recoveries from tagging on the same day. We were surprised when we plotted the recoveries on the radar chart (Figure 10) to learn that the direction of the wind determined if there would be a recovery. Each data point on the chart only represents the wind on a day where one or more monarchs was tagged. We discovered that almost all recoveries occurred when winds originated from the southeast or from the northwest. There were no recoveries when the wind blew from the northeast to the southwest, normally considered a favorable wind direction for the monarch migration in the east and only one when the wind was from the southwest. Continued monitoring of tagged recoveries will show if this pattern persists. We are developing a model that will describe the factors determining the migration destination. With more recoveries we will improve its accuracy.

The flyways of Arizona monarchs migrating to California are unknown. Frey and Schaffner (2004) found monarch movement in response to weather patterns at the California overwintering sites, especially in response to temperature and winds. Monarchs were observed moving north along the California coast from the southern coastal areas (Urquhart 1987). It is unknown if monarchs from Arizona fly west to reach the coast and then fly north to reach the location where they were sighted or directly northwest.

Our data indicates monarchs tagged in Phoenix migrate to Mexico but more tagging will help us learn if they also fly to California as well. More information is also needed about the migration destinations around the state, especially the northern and western portions. Western flight has been observed near Lake Havasu and Alamo Lake. While there has been extensive tagging at the Grand Canyon, Flagstaff, Prescott, Camp Verde, Springerville/Eager, Lake Havasu and other locations, we have not had recoveries at this time. Future recoveries may open up new understanding of migration destinations from these locations.

We found that farmed butterflies shipped from California to Arizona, tagged and released at the Desert Botanical Garden in Phoenix, flew to Mexico rather than returning to California. All five recoveries in Mexico were tagged during the time of predicted peak migration for latitude in Phoenix. Not all of the tagged farm monarchs migrated. In addition to the one farm monarch sighting in Sun City later reported in Tonopah, thirteen tagged farm monarchs were reported in locations to the southwest, south and southeast. Three tagged monarchs were spotted in the same yard in successive years on South Mountain, a slightly southwest flight path.

The migration window for D. plexippus in Arizona was larger than anticipated, with recoveries from monarchs tagged at the beginning of September with a sun angle of 64° to mid-November at 37°. While the largest number of recoveries occurred during the predicted range of 57° to 47°, most in this range migrated to Mexico. Earlier sun angle recoveries were mainly in California, but a few also migrated to Mexico. Baum and Mueller (2015) noted in the southern Great Plains there is a movement of reproductive monarchs into the area in August and September prior to the peak fall migration. F. X. Villablanca of Monarch Alert (pers. comm.) noted only 5% of monarchs at the California overwintering sites are reproductive. Furthermore, the longevity of a monarch tagged near Canelo in southeast Arizona on 20 September 2014 and sighted in Big Sur, California on 29 January 2015 gives additional credence that this monarch was in reproductive diapause. Based on these observations the migration appears to begin in early September through middle October in Arizona with occasional late migrators later.

Tagging recoveries increased from 1 of 564 monarchs to 1 of 198 monarchs tagged in 2012 and 2013. We learned using new tags every year increased our recoveries. Earlier tags were purchased in bulk to save cost but the adhesive decayed overtime, especially when the tags were left in hot conditions. Purchasing new tags each year increased our recovery ratios.

Citizen science. The Southwest Monarch Study is a volunteer non-profit Citizen Science study. Volunteers spent endless hours in the field and used their own personal funds for nets, transportation and any lodging/camping fees. We forged working relationships with monarch experts across the country to create field strategies and protocols. There may be some who question the accuracy of the data we've collected. Droege (2007) notes that in many instances volunteers are more invested than paid college students who are in attendance for a few years and move on. Volunteer Citizen Scientists take their job collecting data more seriously and are more accurate. Volunteers come because they want to, not because they have to. Oberhauser et al. (2015) notes that the data generated in Citizen Science projects are carefully analyzed and provide an avenue to answer questions that would likely never be addressed in traditional academic research. Our continuing study of monarchs in the southwest has documented new insights about the breeding and migratory movements of Danaus plexippus in Arizona.

Acknowledgments

Southwest Monarch Study volunteer Citizen Scientists spent time living with the monarchs in the fields of Arizona. They watched and observed, photographed when possible, and wrote detailed descriptions of their encounter including presence and absence. Their data is priceless and opens a new chapter in understanding monarch butterflies in Arizona. We've likely only scratched the surface of understanding monarch biology in the southwestern United States.

This study would not have been possible without the extraordinary hours in the field tagging, monitoring and recording data of over 300 volunteer citizen scientists. In particular we thank A. Grimaldi, J. Billings, L. Miller, K. Graves, T. Schultz, J. Zofrea, M. Miller, C. Palm-Gessner, R. Gessner, A. Burkhart, R. Rensch, B. Jensen, C. Overlock, L. Paetschow, R. Morris, M. Van dewater, P. Akers, C. Kondrat-Smith, M. Sanford, L. Jakse, W. Anderson, and P. Cherubini. We thank J. Brock, R. Bailowitz, M. Klinkel, R. Gillmore, A.Grkovich, SEABA and CAzBA for their historical documentations of monarchs in Arizona. We are grateful for the support and/or permission to access land for monitoring and tagging at Arizona State Parks, Coronado National Forest, City of Phoenix, Boyce-Thompson Arboretum, Desert Botanical Garden, Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area, Maricopa County Flood Control, National Park Service, Arizona Sonora Desert Museum, Singh Farms, Nina Mason Pulliam Rio Salado Audubon, Hassayampa River Preserve, San Pedro River Inn, Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona Game and Fish, Silver Creek Fish Hatchery, United States Bureau of Land Management, Babacomari Ranch, Highland Center for Natural History, and the support of the National Weather Service, Dr. Robert Casavant, J. Hill, S. Hill, W. Lyons, M. Long, E. McGinn, K. Pegram. We are grateful for the many people who reported tagged monarch sightings and recoveries. This paper would not have been possible without the academic guidance, encouragement and support of Dr. Ronald L. Rutowski, Arizona State University; Dr. Karen Oberhauser, University of Minnesota; Dr. Orley R. (Chip) Taylor, University of Kansas; and many others.

Literature Cited

1.

Arizona Sonora Desert Museum Migratory Pollinators Program: Monarch Butterflies (1999). Available from:  https://www.desertmuseum.org/pollination/monarchs.php (Accessed: 13 February 2015). Google Scholar

2.

R. A. Bailowitz , & J. P. Brock 1991. Butterflies of southeastern Arizona. Sonoran Arthropod Studies. Inc., Tucson, AZ. Google Scholar

3.

R. A. Bartel , K. S. Oberhauser , J. C. De Roode , & S. M. Altizer 2011. Monarch butterfly migration and parasite transmission in eastern North America. Ecology 92: 342–351. Google Scholar

4.

K.A. Baum & E. K. Mueller 2015. Grassland and roadside management practices affect milkweed abundance and opportunities for monarch recruitment, In K. Oberhauser , K.R. Nail , & S. Altizer (eds.), Monarchs in a changing world, pp. 197–202. Cornell University Press, New York. Google Scholar

5.

J. Borland , C. C. Johnson , T. W. Crumpton III , M. Thomas , S. M. Altizer & K. S. Oberhauser 2004. In K. Oberhauser & J. J. Solensky (eds.), The monarch butterfly: biology and conservation, pp. 97 – 104. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. Google Scholar

6.

L. P. Brower 1995. Understanding and misunderstanding the migration of the monarch butterfly (Nymphalidae) in North America: 1857–1995. J. Lepid. Soc. 49:304–385. Google Scholar

7.

L. P. Brower & R. M. Pyle 2004. The interchange of migratory monarchs between Mexico and the western United States, and the importance of floral corridors to the fall and spring migrations. In G. P. Nabhan , (ed.), Conserving migratory pollinators and nectar corridors in western North America, pp 167–178. The University of Arizona Press and the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ. Google Scholar

8.

E. Davison (1999). Arizona Plant Climate Zones. University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences. Available from:  http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/garden/az1169 (Accessed: 28 November 2014). Google Scholar

9.

H. Dingle , M. P. Zalucki , W. A. Rochester & T. Armijo-Prewitt 2005. Distribution of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), in western North America. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 85: 491–500. Google Scholar

10.

S. Droege (2007). Just because you paid them doesn't mean their data are better. Proceedings, Citizen Science Toolkit Conference. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Available from:  www.birds.cornell.edu/citscitoolkit/conference/proceeding-pdfs. (Accessed: 24 November 2014) Google Scholar

11.

D. Frey & A. Schaffner 2004. Spatial and temporal pattern of monarch overwintering abundance in western North America. In K. Oberhauser and J. J. Solensky (eds.), The monarch butterfly: biology and conservation, pp. 167–176. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. Google Scholar

12.

R. S. Funk 1968. Overwintering of Monarch Butterflies as a Breeding Colony in Southwestern Arizona. J. Lepid. Soc. 12: 63–64. Google Scholar

13.

D. L. Gibo 1981. Altitudes attained by migrating monarch butterflies, Danaus p. plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danaidae), as reported by glider pilots. Can. J. Zool. 59: 571–572. Google Scholar

14.

D. L. Gibo & M. J. Pallett 1979. Soaring flight of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danaidae), during the late summer migration in southern Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 57: 1393– 1401. Google Scholar

15.

E. Howard , H. Aschen , & A. K. Davis 2010. Citizen science observations of monarch butterfly overwintering in the southern United States. Psyche doi;10.1155/2010/689301. Google Scholar

16.

Journey North (2011). Two Monarch Butterfly Populations in North America. Available from: http://www.learner.org/jnorth/tm/monarch/Populations_EastWest.html (Date of access: 28 November 2014) Google Scholar

17.

T. H. Kearney , & R. H. Peebles 1960. Arizona flora. Univ. of California Press. Google Scholar

18.

K. L. H Leong , & W. H. Sakai , W. Bremer , D. Feuerstein , & G. Yoshimura 2004. Analysis of the pattern of distribution and abundance of monarch overwintering sites along the California coastline. In K. Oberhauser and J. J. Solensky (eds.), The monarch butterfly: biology and conservation, pp. 177–185. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. Google Scholar

19.

J. I. Lyons , A. A. Pierce, S. M. Barribeau, E. D. Sternberg, A. J. Mongue, D. Roode, & C. Jacobus 2012. Lack of genetic differentiation between monarch butterflies with divergent migration destinations. Molecular Ecol. 21: 3433–3444. Google Scholar

20.

D. Marriott (1997). Where to see the monarchs in California—25 selected sites. Published by the Monarch Program. Available from:  http://www.monarchwatch.org/download/pdf/where.pdf (Date of access: 28 November 2014) Google Scholar

21.

Monarch Watch (2014). Peak Migration Dates: When will the migration peak in my area? Available from:  http://monarchwatch.org/tagmig/peak.html (Date of access: 28 November 2014). Google Scholar

22.

National Weather Service (2008). The North American Monsoon. Available from:  http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outreach/Report-to-the-Nation-Monsoon_aug04.pdf (Date of access: 28 November 2014). Google Scholar

23.

National Weather Service (2014). Unlocking the Mystery of the Watch/Warning/Advisory Web Map. Available from:  http://www.srh.noaa.gov/bro/?n=mapcolors (Date of access: 28 November 2014). Google Scholar

24.

National Weather Service (2015). 2014 Phoenix climate year in review. Available from:  http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/psr/pns/2015/January/PHX_2014_YearlyClimate.php (Date of access: 21 February 2015). Google Scholar

25.

NOAA Solar Calculator (2014). Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division. Available from:  http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/grad/solcalc (Date of access: 21 February 2015). Google Scholar

26.

K. S Oberhauser , & M. Solensky 2004. The Monarch Butterfly, Cornell University Press, New York. Google Scholar

27.

K. Oberhauser , L. Ries , S. Altizer , R. Batalden , J. Ekstrum , M. Garland , E. Howard , S. Jepsen , J. Lovett , M. Monroe , G. Morris , E Rendon-Salinas , R. RuBino , A. Ryan , C. Taylor , R. Trevino , F. Villablanca , & D. Walton 2015. Citizen Scientists and an Iconic Insect: 70 Years and Counting, pp. 13–30. In K. Oberhauser , K.R. Nail , and S. Altizer (eds.), Monarchs in a changing world. Cornell University Press, New York. Google Scholar

28.

R. Pyle 1999. Chasing Monarchs. Houghton Mifflin, New York. Google Scholar

29.

W. Sharber & K. A. Baum (2010). Oklahoma State University. 95th ESA Annual Meeting. Available from:  https://eco.confex.com/eco/2010/techprogram/P26884.HTM (Date of Access: 28 November 2014). Google Scholar

30.

Southwest Environmental Information Network, SEINet (2015). Available from:  http//:swbiodiversity.org/seinet/index.php. (Date of Access: 15 February 2015). Google Scholar

31.

Southwest U.S./Northwest Mexico Leps, SoWestLeps (1999). Available from:  https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/SoWest-Lep/info (Date of Access: 28 November 2014). Google Scholar

32.

S.R. Stevens & D. F. Frey 2010. Host plant pattern and variation in climate predict the location of natal grounds for migratory monarch butterflies in western North America. J. Insect Conserv. 14: 731–744. Google Scholar

33.

R. Thompson 2014. Lead Forecaster at the Storm Prediction Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Weather Service. Google Scholar

34.

F. A. Urquhart 1960. The Monarch Butterfly, University of Toronto Press, Canada. Google Scholar

35.

F. A. Urquhart 1987. The Monarch Butterfly: International Traveler, Wm. Caxton Ltd, Ellison Bay, WI. Google Scholar

36.

F. A. Urquhart & N. R. Urquhart 1977. Overwintering Areas and Migratory Pvoutes of the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus P. plexippus, Lepidoptera: Danaidae) in North America, with Special Reference to the Western Population. Canad. Entomol. 1977: 1583– 1589. Google Scholar

37.

R. E. Woodson 1954. The North American Species of Asclepios L. Ann. Mo. Bot. Garden Vol. 41: 1–211. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1:

Arizona Monarch Sightings by Richard Bailowitz, 1975 to 1984

tA01a_91.gif

continued

tA01b_91.gif
Gail M. Morris, Christopher Kline, and Scott M. Morris "Status of Danaus plexippus Population in Arizona," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 69(2), 91-107, (1 June 2015). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.69i2.a10
Received: 30 November 2014; Published: 1 June 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
17 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Arizona
Danaus plexippus
migration
Monarch butterfly
Southwest Monarch Study
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top