Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
31 March 2015 Allometry among Structures of Proboscises of Vanessa cardui L. (Nymphalidae) and Its Relationship to Fluid Uptake
Valerie R. Kramer, Catherine P. Mulvane, Aubrey Brothers
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The morphometrics of proboscises of Vanessa cardui were examined to determine potential allometric growth relationships. Butterfly mass and six proboscis measurements were recorded from V. cardui reared on artificial diet treatments, in conjunction with fluid uptake rates. Log10 transformed data revealed negative allometry with proboscis length, butterfly mass, and drinking region length as the independent variables. Fluid uptake rates, however, had a nearly isometric relationship with most proboscis measurements, but not the total number of sensilla styloconica, which indicated inverse allometry with fluid uptake rates. The patterns exposed here show that the studied proboscis structures are important predictors for fluid uptake, but the selection pressures associated with feeding strategies and the substrates from which V. cardui feed favor a particular proboscis architecture, deviations from this configuration might require different feeding strategies and food sources.

The lepidopteran proboscis is composed of an assortment of structures that operate as a functional unit for liquid feeding. Fluid uptake dynamics depends on the orientation and spacing of proboscis structures and wettability dynamics (Monaenkova et al. 2012, Lehnert et al. 2013, Lee and Lee 2014) that work in coordination with the cibarial pump (Lee et al. 2014). This twofold system combined with the porosity along the proboscis legular seam (Kwauk et al. 2014) challenges the paradigm of the proboscis being sealed and straw-like in function (Kingsolver and Daniel 1979, Borrell and Krenn 2006, Bauder et al. 2013).

The structural diversity of the proboscis includes the two concave maxillary galeae that come together at their medial sides by dorsal and ventral legulae, which produces a tubular food canal after the adult emerges from the exuvium (Eastham and Eassa 1955, Krenn 1997, Krenn 2010). The ventral legulae interlink for the majority of the proboscis length (Lehnert unpublished). The lower branches of the dorsal legulae overlap for the proximal 80–95% of the proboscis length (Krenn and Kristensen 2000, Krenn et al. 2001), which represents an overall hydrophobic and structurally demarcated nondrinking region (Lehnert et al. 2013). Larger upper branches of dorsal legulae and enlarged interlegular spaces provide an overall hydrophilic profile that characterizes the distal region (i.e., drinking region) of the proboscis (Lehnert et al. 2013).

The use of fluorescent stains coupled with studies of surface roughness and contact angle measurements suggests that proboscis structures differ in their wettability and role in the fluid uptake process (Monaenkova et al. 2012, Lehnert et al. 2013, Lee and Lee 2014). The galeal surface, for instance, is hydrophobic and might facilitate self-cleaning and the channeling of liquids to regions where fluid uptake occurs. The hydrophilic sensilla styloconica (chemosensilla) create a brushlike, distal region of the proboscis in some non-flower visiting species (Krenn et al. 2001, Molleman et al. 2005). The sensilla styloconica facilitate the channeling of fluids to the hydrophilic dorsal legulae (Lee and Lee 2014), which is further enhanced due to the sensilla creating an elliptical cross section of the proboscis that increases the meniscus height of liquid surfaces (Lehnert et al. 2013). The modified dorsal legulae combined with intervening spaces in the drinking region provide sponge-like abilities that bring fluids from porous surfaces into the food canal for subsequent delivery to the gut (Monaenkova et al. 2012).

The structural architecture of proboscises relates to feeding habits (Krenn et al. 2001, Molleman et al. 2005, Zaspel et al. 2011); however, how proboscis structural configurations differ among individuals of different sizes within species is relatively unstudied and is the purpose of this investigation. Previous studies have indicated an allometric growth relationship between adult body size and structures in some insect species (Stern and Emlen 1999, Shingleton et al. 2008). Allometric growth is the disproportionate relationship between characters (e.g., structural, behavioral, physiological); as one character increases in measurement another character increases at a disproportionate rate (Huxley 1932, Klingenberg 1996). Huxley (1932) proposed the allometric growth equation y = axb, where y and x are the measured characters and a and b are constants. Log-transformed data results in the equation log y = log a + b log x, where b is the slope of the line on a log-log plot between the measured characters and serves as an indicator of positive allometric (b > 1), isometric (b = 1), negative allometric (0 < b < 1), and inverse allometric (b < 0) relationships (Huber 1985, Klingenberg 1996). Allometric growth relationships have been studied in a wide variety of organisms, including plants (Weiner 2004), fish (Gisbert 1999), octopuses (Lefkaditou and Bekas 2004), humans (Shea and Bailey 1996), and insects (Nijhout and Wheeler 1996, Simmons and Emlen 2006, Emlen et al. 2007), including Lepidoptera (Agosta and Janzen 2005, Kunte 2007, Bauder et al. 2013).

Fig. 1.

Schematic showing proboscis measurements. The drinking region was measured from the transition point where the upper branches of dorsal legulae begin to enlarge to the proboscis tip (Lehnert et al. 2013). Insets A – C are confocal microscopy images showing proboscis measurements of: 1) galea width, which was measured at the point where the upper branches of dorsal legulae (ub) begin to enlarge (lower branches, lb, shown for reference), 2) length of sensilla styloconica (ss, measured from the base to the sensillum tip), and 3) dorsal legulae width (dl, measured from the dorsal legulae base to the tip). The food canal (fc) also is shown in C. The spacing of the dorsal legulae between the opposing galeae, thus showing the ventral legulae in the middle and the food canal is an artifact from the preparation process. Illustration by Miranda Bowman.

f01_183.jpg

Here, we investigate allometric growth relationships among the structural configurations of proboscises of Painted lady butterflies (Vanessa cardui L.) reared on artificial diet treatments. If allometry is present, we hypothesize that proboscis functionality could be affected by changes in structural conformations, for instance, changes in spacing between structures could impact capillarity and alterations in wettability patterns might affect the channeling of fluids. Fluid uptake rates, therefore, are examined for its relationship to proboscis structures. Fluid uptake rates in this study are based on the assumption that the cibarial pump operates similarly among individuals and scales proportionally in size with butterfly mass.

Materials and Methods

Rearing protocol and diet treatments.

Eggs of V. cardui were obtained from Carolina Biological Supply Company© and placed into 2 oz plastic containers with lids (3 eggs per cup) and an artificial diet treatment (Educational Science©). Containers were placed into a Percival© environmental chamber maintained at 22° C, 60–65% RH, and a 16:8 photoperiod. In order to induce size differences among individuals, treatments of artificial diet were prepared by varying the proportion of dH2O mixed with the dry diet (15, 20, 25, 30, and 35% dH2O). An additional diet mixture (16.66% dH2O, recommended concentration by manufacturer) was used as a control. Third instar larvae were placed singly into individual 2 oz containers with their diet treatment (ad libitum) where they remained until adult emergence. Adult butterflies were placed into glassine envelopes approximately 24 hrs after emergence and stored in a 4° C refrigerator for assessment of fluid uptake rates.

Feeding trials.

Butterflies were removed from the refrigerator and kept in the glassine envelopes at room temperature (21° C) for 1 hr prior to each feeding trial. The mass (mg) of each butterfly was determined using a digital scale before each feeding trial. The butterflies were then fed a 20% sucrose solution from a 35 mm petri dish for 60 sec. An insect pin was used to maintain contact between the solution and the distal 25% of the proboscis for the entire feeding period. Butterflies were then weighed again. Fluid uptake rates were calculated by averaging the difference in butterfly weights before and after feeding trials from three feeding periods (one feeding per day) and divided by 1 min. Butterflies were stored in a 4° C refrigerator and allowed to warm for each feeding trial.

Proboscis imaging and structural measurements.

After the feeding trials, butterflies were placed in glassine envelopes and stored for 24 hrs. in a -80° C freezer. The heads were then removed using scissors, placed in glass vials with dH2O and stored in a 4° C refrigerator. Scissors were used to remove proboscises from the heads, which were then placed on glass slides in dH2O and imaged at 0.78X magnification with a Leica M205 C stereomicroscope. A measuring tool was placed next to the proboscis and an image of the total proboscis length was acquired with an IC 80 HD camera.The dorsal side of approximately 25% of the distal region of proboscises was imaged at 20X magnification on an Olympus IX81 confocal microscope (GFP channel). Serial images were pieced together using Adobe® Photoshop CS5 into a composite image, which was used to take measurements. We measured: 1) the length of the drinking region (from the proboscis tip to the transition in the width of the upper branches of dorsal legulae), 2) widths of dorsal legulae and 3) sensilla styloconica near the midpoint of the drinking region, and 4) galea width at the transition point of the drinking and nondrinking regions (Fig. 1). The average widths of dorsal legulae and sensilla styloconica were determined by measuring three of each structure from the midpoint of the drinking region length. The total number of sensilla styloconica was counted. All structures were measured using ImageJ software ( http://imagej.nihgov/ij/).

Fig. 2.

Log10-Log10 plots indicating relationships between proboscis structures and butterfly mass. The line of best fit is accompanied with lines showing the mean confidence intervals (95%) and the slope for each equation is bolded. The (*) indicates slopes that significantly differed (p < 0.0001) from 1 using linear regression analysis.

f02_183.jpg

Fig. 3.

Log10-Log10 plots indicating relationships between proboscis structures and proboscis length. The line of best fit is accompanied with lines showing the mean confidence intervals (95%) and the slope for each equation is bolded. The (*) indicates slopes that significantly differed (p < 0.0001) from 1 using linear regression analysis.

f03_183.jpg

Fig. 4.

Log10-Log10 plots indicating relationships between proboscis structures and drinking region length. The line of best fit is accompanied with lines showing the mean confidence intervals (95%) and the slope for each equation is bolded. The (*) indicates slopes that significantly differed (p < 0.0001) from 1 using linear regression analysis.

f04_183.jpg

Statistical analyses.

Measurements were compared for significant differences among the diet treatments using analysis of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.05) and a Tukey post hoc test (SPSS software). Data were log10 transformed and allometry was determined using the equation: log10 y = log10 a + b log10 x, which is derived from the allometry equation y = ax where b is the slope of the log10-log10 plots of x and y, and a is the y-intercept. Body mass, proboscis length, and the drinking region length were used as the independent variables in a linear regression analysis. A separate linear regression analysis was performed with fluid uptake rates as the dependent variable. Departures from isometry (i.e., slope b = 1) were tested for significance (p < 0.05) with a Student's t test. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the impact of structures on fluid uptake rates. All data were analyzed using SAS (unless noted otherwise) and figures for log10-log10 plots were produced in SPSS.

Results

A total of 56 V. cardui were reared; however, there were individuals that did not qualify for some recorded measurements for analysis. Butterflies with split proboscises, for instance, were not used to assess fluid uptake rates. The variables: butterfly mass, proboscis length, drinking region length, dorsal legulae width, and total number of sensilla styloconica indicated significant differences among butterflies of different diet treatments (Table 1). Butterflies reared on the 25 and 30% diet treatments were larger in mass and proboscis structure measurements than individuals reared on other diet treatments.

Linear regression analysis indicated that all slopes (b) of the log10-log10 plots significantly deviated from 1 when butterfly weight, proboscis length, and drinking region length are used as independent variables (p < 0.05), and all showed negative allometric relationships (0 < b < 1) (Figs. 24). When butterfly weight was used as the independent variable the r2 values ranged from 0.07 (total numbers of sensilla styloconica and dorsal legulae width) to 0.68 (proboscis length) (Fig. 2). Using the proboscis length as an independent variable also produced a range of r2 values (0.41 for drinking region length to 0.05 for total number of sensilla styloconica and dorsal legulae width) (Fig. 3); all r2 values were small when using drinking region length as the independent variable (Fig. 4).

Table 1.

Measurements of variables used to determine allometric growth relationships. The treatments are named according to the percentage of dH2O mixed with the dry diet.

t01_183.gif

Table 2.

Results from linear regression analysis to determine allometry between proboscis characters (lengths and widths measured in μm) and fluid uptake rate (mg/min) (dependent variable). The slope values are shown in bold.

t02_183.gif

When fluid uptake rate was used as the dependent variable, only the total number of sensilla styloconica and butterfly mass produced slopes that significantly differed from 1 (Table 2). The slope between the total number of sensilla styloconica and fluid uptake rate indicated inverse allometry (b < 0, n = 34, p = 0.0194) and the slope with butterfly mass showed negative allometry (n = 39, p < 0.0001). The r2 values were low for comparisons that used fluid uptake rate as the dependent variable, and was 0 when butterfly mass was used as a potential predictor.

A multiple regression analysis was conducted to predict the overall fluid uptake rate with proboscis measurements and butterfly mass as the variables (Table 3). The combination of these measures was significantly related to fluid uptake rate (F7,24= 8.29, p < 0.0001). The coefficient of determination indicated that the studied variables account for 70.74% of the variability in fluid uptake rate. Fluid uptake rate increased for each unit increase in proboscis length, dorsal legulae width, length of sensilla styloconica, and galea width when holding each variable constant (Table 3). Fluid uptake rate decreased, however, with increasing drinking region length, number of sensilla styloconica, and butterfly mass. Only dorsal legulae width, the total number of sensilla styloconica, and butterfly mass had a slope that significantly differed from 0.

Discussion

A functional proboscis plays an essential role in butterfly fitness, including sodium intake associated with puddling behavior (Arms et al. 1974) and the acquisition of amino acids and carbohydrates (Bauernfeind and Fischer 2005). Previous lepidopteran studies of allometric growth of proboscises have primarily focused on relationships between proboscis length and body size with respect to the cibarial pump, feeding strategies, and fitness trade-offs (Kunte 2007, Bauder et al. 2013). Intraspecific allometric studies provide insight into the importance of structures for specific functions; they also offer predictive parameters regarding how structures might be selected for or against under particular environmental conditions. Here, we addressed how structures of proboscises vary in V. cardui of different body masses and if these variations relate to fluid uptake rates.

Table 3.

Multiple linear regression analysis of proboscis structures (lengths and widths measured in µm) with fluid uptake rate as the dependent variable (32 observations used, r2 = 0.7074, df = 1).

t03_183.gif

All measured proboscis structures exhibited a similar trend of negative allometry (0 < b < 1) when related to butterfly mass, proboscis length, and drinking region length. We suspect that the lack of an isometric relationship is due to the intense selection pressures that act on the proboscis architecture. Butterfly feeding strategies are complex and have been optimized for efficient food searching and handling (Boggs 1988, Krenn 1998), in addition to fluid uptake. Extensive alterations in proboscis architectures might prevent feeding from the flowers from which V. cardui use as nectar sources, i.e., adding one μm to proboscis width per one μm added to proboscis length could result in a proboscis too wide to reach nectar sources in narrow floral corollas. When put into context of fitness trade-offs (Berenbaum et al. 1986, Futuyma 1997, Agrawal 2000), the data indicate that similar amounts of resources are allocated to proboscis structures to maintain feeding habits and an optimal fluid uptake rate within species, regardless of butterfly mass. The results of the linear regression, however, conflict with those of the multiple linear regression, suggesting there is some evidence of multicollinearity among the independent variables. The fluid uptake rates measured in this study are similar to those reported in previous studies of V. cardui feeding abilities (Hainsworth et al. 1991; Kwauk et al. 2014).

Sensilla styloconica, in addition to their chemosensory abilities (Altner and Altner 1986, Petr and Stewart 2004), are often attributed to function similarly as a mop, adapted for acquiring liquids from films on porous surfaces (Molleman et al. 2005, Lehnert et al. 2013, Lee and Lee 2014); however, this study indicated that increasing the number of sensilla styloconica decreased fluid uptake rates. We suggest that proboscis movements (Krenn 1998, Knopp and Krenn 2003, Tsai et al. 2014) that resemble mopping on surfaces might assist with the channeling of fluids from the sensilla styloconica to the dorsal legulae where fluid uptake can occur. The pool feeding system used here to test fluid uptake rates eliminated proboscis-to-surface contact; therefore, liquids might become trapped in the spaces between the hydrophilic sensilla rather than move to the dorsal legulae. The generalized feeding habits of V. cardui might favor maintaining sensilla styloconica for surface feeding, but these are fewer in number compared to other butterfly species that primarily visit exposed liquids on porous surfaces (Petr and Stewart 2004, Krenn et al. 2001).

The presence of a nearly isometric slope between most studied proboscis structures and fluid uptake rates indicates that these variables are important for fluid uptake, which could have important attributes to biomimetic studies. The lepidopteran proboscis has become a model for the production of microfluidic devices (Tsai et al. 2011). We envision the next generation of microfluidic devices capitalizing on the structures and their role in fluid uptake described here. Additional studies of allometry in butterflies with other feeding habits also could contribute to a pool of knowledge of proboscis structure and function relationships; therefore, setting the stage for microfluidic probes that vary in their structures for particular functions.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Connie Kramer for her assistance with diet preparation. This work was partially funded by National Science Foundation grant IOS-1354956. Two anonymous reviewers provided comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Literature Cited

1.

S. J. Agosta , and D. H. Janzen . 2005. Body size distributions of large Costa Rican dry forest moths and the underlying relationship between plant and pollinator morphology. Oikos 108:183–193. Google Scholar

2.

A. A. Agrawal 2000. Host range evolution: Adaptation of mites and trade-offs in fitness on alternate hosts. Ecology 81:500–508. Google Scholar

3.

H. Altner , and I. Altner . 1986. Sensilla with both terminal pore and wall pores on the proboscis of the moth Thogogastria buboWalker (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Zool. Anz. 216:129–150. Google Scholar

4.

K. Arms , P. Feeney , and R. C. Lederhouse . 1974. Sodium stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus. Science 185:372–374. Google Scholar

5.

J. A. S. Bauder , S. Handschuh ., B. D. Metscher ., and H. W. Krenn . 2013. Functional morphology of the feeding apparatus and evolution of proboscis length in metalmark butterflies (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 110:291–304. Google Scholar

6.

S. S. Bauernfeind , and K. Fischer . 2005. Effects of adult-derived carbohydrates, amino acids and micronutrients of female reproduction in a fruit-feeding butterfly. J. Insect Physiol. 51:545–554. Google Scholar

7.

M. R. Berenbaum , A. R. Zangerl , and J. K. Nitao . 1986. Constraints on chemical coevolution: Wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm. Evolution 40:1215–1228. Google Scholar

8.

C. L. Boggs 1988. Rates of nectar feeding in butterflies: effects of sex, size, age and sugar concentration. Fun. Ecol. 2:289–295. Google Scholar

9.

B. J. Borrell , and H. W. Krenn . 2006. Nectar feeding in long proboscid insects. In: Herrel A, Speck T, Rowe NP, eds. Ecology and Biomechanics: a mechanical approach to the ecology of animals and plants. Boca Raton: CRC Group Taylor & Francis Group, 185–212. Google Scholar

10.

L. E. Eastham , and Y. E. E. Eassa . 1955. The feeding mechanism of the butterfly Pieris brassicae L. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 239:1–43. Google Scholar

11.

D. J. Emlen , L. L. Corley , and B. Ewen-Campen . 2007. On the origin and evolutionary diversification of beetle horns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104:8661–8668. Google Scholar

12.

D. J. Futuyma 1997. Evolutionary Biology, 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA. Google Scholar

13.

E. Gisbert 1999. Early development and allometric growth patterns in Siberian sturgeon and their ecological significance. J. Fish Biol. 54:852–862. Google Scholar

14.

F. R. Hainsworth , E. Precup , and T. Hamill . 1991. Feeding, energy processing rates and egg production in painted lady butterflies. J. Exp. Biol. 156: 249–265. Google Scholar

15.

M. E. Huber 1985. Allometric growth of the carapace in Trapezia (Brachyura, Xanthidae). J. Crust. Biol. 5:79–83. Google Scholar

16.

J. S. Huxley 1932. Problems of relative growth. Lincoln Mac Veagh - The Dial Press, New York. Google Scholar

17.

J. G. Kingsolver , and T. L. Daniel . 1979. On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies. J. Theor. Biol. 76:167–179. Google Scholar

18.

C. P. Klingenberg 1996. Multivariate allometry. In : L. F. Marcus , M. Corti , A. Loy , G. J. P. Naylor , and D. E. Slice , eds. Advances in morphometrics. New York, Plenum Press. Google Scholar

19.

M. C. N. Knopp , H. W. Krenn . 2003. Efficiency of fruit juice feeding in Morpho peleides (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Insect Behav. 16:67–77. Google Scholar

20.

H .W. Krenn 1997. Proboscis assembly in butterflies (Lepidoptera) - a once in a lifetime sequence of events. Eur. J. Entomol. 94:495–501. Google Scholar

21.

H. W. Krenn 1998. Proboscis sensilla in Vanessa cardui (Nymphalidae, Lepidoptera): functional morphology and significance in flower-probing. Zoomorphol. 118:23–30. Google Scholar

22.

H. W. Krenn 2010. Feeding mechanisms of adult Lepidoptera: structure, function, and evolution of the mouthparts. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55:307–327. Google Scholar

23.

H. W. Krenn , and N. P. Kristensen . 2000. Early evolution of the proboscis of Lepidoptera (Insecta): external morphology of the galea in basal glossatan moths lineages, with remarks on the origin of the pilifers. Zool. Anz. 101:565–575. Google Scholar

24.

H.W. Krenn , K. P. Zulka , and T. Gatschnegg . 2001. Proboscis morphology and food preferences in Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea). J. Zool. 253:17–26. Google Scholar

25.

K. Kunte 2007. Allometry and functional constraints on proboscis lengths in butterflies. Fun. Ecol. 21:982–987. Google Scholar

26.

K. J. Kwauk , D. K. Hasegawa , M.S. Lehnert , C. E. Beard , P. D. Gerard , K. G. Kornev , and P. H. Adler . 2014. Drinking with an unsealed tube: Fluid uptake along the butterfly proboscis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 107:886–892. Google Scholar

27.

S. C. Lee , and S. J. Lee . 2014. Uptake of liquid from wet surfaces by the brush-tipped proboscis of a butterfly. Sci. Rep. 4: 6934 doi:10.1038. Google Scholar

28.

S. C. Lee , B.H. Kim , and S. J. Lee . 2014. Experimental analysis of the liquid-feeding mechanism of the butterfly Pieris rapae. J. Exp. Biol. 217:2013–2019. Google Scholar

29.

E. Lefkaditou , P. Bekas . 2004. Analysis of beak morphometry of the horned octopus Eledone cirrhosa (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) in the Thracian Sea (NE Mediterranean). Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 5:143–149. Google Scholar

30.

M. S. Lehnert , D. Monaenkova , T. Andrukh , C. E. Beard , P. H. Adler , and K. G. Kornev . 2013. Hydrophobic-hydrophilic dichotomy of the butterfly proboscis. J. R. Soc. Interface 10: doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0336. Google Scholar

31.

F. Molleman , H. W. Krenn , M. E. Van Alphen , P. M. Brakefield , P. J. Devries , and B. J. Zwaan . 2005. Food intake of fruit-feeding butterflies: evidence for adaptive variation in proboscis morphology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86:333–343. Google Scholar

32.

D. Monaenkova , M. S. Lehnert , T. Andrukh , C.E. Beard , B. Rubin , A. Tokarev , W. Lee , P. H. Adler , and K. G. Kornev . 2012. Butterfly proboscis: combining a drinking straw with a nanosponge facilitated diversification of feeding habits. J. R. Soc. Interface. 9:720–726. Google Scholar

33.

H. F. Nijhout , and D. E. Wheeler . 1996. Growth models of complex allometries in holometabolous insects. Amer. Nat. 40–56. Google Scholar

34.

D. Petr , and K. W. Stewart . 2004. Comparative morphology of sensilla styloconica on the proboscis of North American nymphalidae and other selected taxa (Lepidoptera): systematic and ecological considerations. T. Am. Entomol. Soc. 130:293–409. Google Scholar

35.

B. T. Shea , and R. C. Bailey . 1996. Allometry and adaptation of body proportions and stature in African pygmies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 100:311–340. Google Scholar

36.

A. W. Shingleton , C. K. Mirth , and P. W. Bates . 2008. Development model of static allometry in holometabolous insects. Proc. R. Soc. B. 275:1875–1885. Google Scholar

37.

L. W. Simmons , and D. J. Emlen . 2006. Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103:16346–16351. Google Scholar

38.

D. L. Stern , D. J. Emlen . 1999. The developmental basis for allometry in insects. Development. 126:1091–1101. Google Scholar

39.

C.-C. Tsai , P. Mikes , T. Andrukh , E. White , D. Monaenkova , O. Burtovyy , R. Burtovyy , B. Rubin , D. Lukas , I. Luzinov , J. R. Owens , and K. G. Kornev . 2011.Nanoporous artificial proboscis for probing minute amount of liquids. Nanoscale 3: 4685–4695. Google Scholar

40.

C.-C. Tsai , D. Monaenkova , C. E. Beard , P. H. Adler , K. G. Kornev . 2014. Paradox of the drinking-straw model of the butterfly proboscis. J. Exp. Biol. 217:1–9. Google Scholar

41.

J. Weiner 2004. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 6:207–215. Google Scholar

42.

J. M. Zaspel , S. J. Weller , and M. A. Branham . 2011. A comparative survey of proboscis morphology and associated structures in fruitpiercing, tear-feeding, and blood-feeding moths in the subfamily Calpinae. Zoomorphol. 130:203–225. Google Scholar
Valerie R. Kramer, Catherine P. Mulvane, and Aubrey Brothers "Allometry among Structures of Proboscises of Vanessa cardui L. (Nymphalidae) and Its Relationship to Fluid Uptake," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 69(3), 183-191, (31 March 2015). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.69i3.a5
Received: 27 May 2015; Accepted: 27 May 2015; Published: 31 March 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Allometric growth
feeding strategies
isometry
Morphometrics
wettability
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top