Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2017 Ornativalva erubescens (Walsingham) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Introduced in North America
Sangmi Lee, Ian Watkinson, James Vargo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ornativalva (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is an Old World genus known to be associated with the plant genus Tamarix (Angiosperm: Tamaricaceae) which was introduced to North America and became widely distributed in the Southwestern United States. Ornativalva erubescens, introduced from the Old World, is reported from the Southwestern United States. Ornativalva erubescens is redescribed. Adults and male and female genitalia are illustrated.

Ornativalva Gozmány is an Old World genus in the family Gelechiidae (Lepidoptera). The genus was revised by Sattler (1967, 1976) and contains 60 described species from the Palaearctic Region and one species from South Africa (Bidzilya 2009; ftp.funet.fi Feb. 27 2017, Li 1991, Li & Zheng 1996, Sattler 1967, 1976).

According to the literature, the genus Ornativalva is closely correlated with the plant genus Tamarix, commonly called saltcedar, based on two lines of evidence. First, the distribution of Ornativalva and Tamarix are highly similar. Second, a number of Ornativalva species were reared from Tamarix host plants. The other known host plant is Frankenia (Frankeniaceae) (Sattler 1976). Saltcedar is native to xeric areas of Eurasia and Africa and was introduced into the United States in the 1800s, where it was planted for erosion control along river systems in the Southwestern United States. Tamarix ramosissima, T. chinensis and hybrids between these are now considered undesirable invasive plant species in the Southwestern United States, particularly in desert regions of California and many riparian habitats in New Mexico. Land managers and owners of riparian areas all across the Southwestern United States, as well as many state, public, and private organizations in Mexico, are struggling to deal with saltcedar. Thousands of dollars are spent every year trying to control or attempt to eradicate saltcedar in the White Sands Missile Range, Holloman Air Force Base and White Sands National Monument in Otero County New Mexico (E. Metzler, personal communication). Currently the distribution of saltcedar in the United States is reported along major rivers and reservoirs from southern California east through Texas and western Oklahoma, and north to Nevada, Colorado and Utah. Some years ago, the USDA brought one of the natural consumers of saltcedar, Ornativalva grisea Sattler, from China and tested it in quarantine, but any further updates are not reported (Bossard et al. 2000, Chew 2009, Nagler et al 2011). The herein reported introduction of O. erubescens (Walsingham) could be considered as an accidental potential biological control.

Ornativalva erubescens, naturally distributed in Northern Africa to Western Asia, was recently collected in the Southwestern United States, with an especially high abundance of individuals from the state of Arizona. The introduced species is redescribed and illustrated below, and known locality records from the United States are given.

Materials and Methods

Imago specimens were captured at a 12 Volt, 15 Watt Ultraviolet (UV) light. The lectotype female (Wlsm no. 96596) of O. erubescens deposited in the Natural History Museum, London (NHM) was examined. Dissection and slide mounting methods for genitalia followed Clarke (1941), except preparations were stained with eosin and mounted in Euparal. A Leica M205 A Stereo-Microscope (with magnifications 7.76-159X) was used for examining specimens and slide mounts. Images were made with the Passport II Imaging System with a Canon MPE 65 mm 1–5X micro-photography lens, and with a Leica stereoscope with Leica Application Suite 4.6©. Specimens are deposited in the Arizona State University Hasbrouck Insect Collection (ASUHIC), at least one male and one female deposited in the U.S. National Museum of Natural History (USNM), and several specimens in the British Museum Natural History, London (BMNH) (Ian Watkinson, personal communication, June 26, 2017).

Figs. 1–8.

1–2. Imagos of Ornativalva erubescens. 3–5. Ornativalva erubescens: 3. Head; 4. Metascutum; 5. Metascutum, close-up 6–8. Ornativalva erubescens: 6. Male genitalia; 7. Phallus; 8. Male abdominal segment VIII

f01_141.jpg

Figs. 9–10.

Ornativalva erubescens: 9. Female genitalia; 10. Female abdominal segment VIII

f09_141.jpg

Genus Ornativalva Gozmány, 1955

  • Ornativalva Gozmány, 1955, Ann. Hist.-nat. Mus. natn. Hung. 47: 308–309 [keys], 310.

  • Type species: Gelechia plutelliformis Staudinger, 1859

  • Pelostola Janse, 1960, Moths S. Afr. 6(2): 188.

  • Type species: Pelostola kalahariensis Janse, 1960

  • Most Ornativalva species are characterized by having frontal modifications or processes on the denuded head, however some species are free of modifications. The metascutum bears paired patches of long hair-like scales near its posterior margin, like most geleehiid species, however some species of Ornativalva are found with modified short broad scales. The forewing bears a characteristic W-shaped line in the fold. The genitalia in both sexes are diagnostic; the male valvae are divided into two to five branches, and in the female a signum is always present in the corpus bursae.

  • Ornativalva erubescens (Walsingham, 1904) Figs. 110

  • Gelechia erubescens Walsingham, 1904, Entomologist's mon. Mag. 40: 265.

  • Ornativalva erubescens (Walsingham) Sattler, 1964: 578; Sattler, 1976: 108; Li & Li, 2005: 247.

  • Description (Figs. 1–5). Wing length 5.6–6.2 mm. Head pale or whitish ochreous, brown along eye; without developed arc above the transfrontal sulcus. Vertex without enlarged scale bases or frontal process. Labial palpus pale or whitish ochreous; outer surface of second segment with scattered light brown rings at base and apex; third segment with scattered light brown scales. Antennae dark brown with pale ochreous rings. Thorax ochreous or pale ochreous; metascutum with a paired group of hair-like scales near its posterior margin. Tegula dark brown with white mottled. Forewing with a short dark brown basal streak; anterior half of wing dark brown like a band running from the base slightly widening toward the apex and the termen, W-shaped markings in the fold, posterior half of wing ochreous or pale ochreous, dark dot at end of cell with short dark streak extending towards apex, pale ochreous broad spot extending towards costa along anterior streak, pale ochreous streak at four fifths of costa, sometimes extending towards the dorsum along the posterior half of the wing, base of fringes with distinct dark markings. Hindwing dark brown. Frenulum of female double or triple.

  • Male genitalia (Figs. 6–8). Uncus short, tubular, truncated. Gnathos absent. Valva broad at base, divided costal and saccular parts widely separated. Costa almost as long as valva, costal half tapering, curved dorsally, digitate-shaped, pointed at apex; harpe almost two-thirds length of costa, bent near middle, broader at apex. Saccular region tapering, apex rounded, turned dorsad. Sacculus digitate-shaped, almost half length of saccular region, enlarged near middle, rounded at apex. Phallus with slightly bulbous base, apical one-third curved, tapering, apex truncated.

  • Female genitalia (Figs. 9–10). Abdominal segment VIII posteriorly with paired patch of short scales. Apophyses anteriores a little shorter, or almost as long as length of apophyses posteriores. Antrum well developed, sclerotized, funnel-shaped, anterior portion narrowed. Ductus bursae almost twice length of corpus bursae when fully extended, coiled inside the abdomen. Signum with pair of sclerotized teeth, no sclerotized bridge of the signum.

  • Material examined (37 specimens) (Fig. 11). 3(♂), 3(♀), USA: AZ: Yuma Co., Yuma, Elev. 200', 16.vi.2016, at blacklight, leg. I. Watkinson (male genitalia slide No. SLEE0875); 12(♂), 12(♀), USA: AZ: Cochise Co., Willcox Playa Wildlife Area, Kansas Settlement Rd., 32.142360, - 109.758675, Elev. 4177ft., 5.VIII.2016, UV light, leg. S. Lee and F. Skillman (male genitalia slide No. SLEE0873; female genitalia slide No. SLEE0874); 1(♀), USA: TX: Brewster Co., N29.265, W103.790, 12.iii.2014, leg. J. Vargo; 5(♀), USA: NV: Clark Co., N35.495, W114.69, 5.X.2016, leg. J. Vargo; 1(♀), USA: NV: Clark Co., N36.01, W115.488, Elev. 5400ft., 6.X.2016, leg. J. Vargo. Slides deposited in ASUHIC.

  • Diagnosis. The forewing pattern with the dark brown band-like anterior half, short dark basal streak or W-shaped markings in the fold, is similar to O. arabica Sattler, O. aspera Sattler, or O. pulchella Sattler. The male genitalia are rather similar to O. frontella Sattler especially with the harpe bent near middle. O. erubescens is specifically separated from those similar ones by the combination of characters: head without enlarged scale bases or frontal process; forewing with a short dark brown basal streak, anterior half of wing dark brown, posterior half of wing ochreous or pale ochreous, pale ochreous broad spot extending towards costa along anterior streak, pale ochreous streak at four fifths of costa; male with harpe bent near middle, sacculus digitate-shaped, enlarged near middle, rounded at apex; female with funnel-shaped antrum, signum with pair of sclerotized teeth, sclerotized bridge absent.

  • Biology. Host plant unknown, however suspected to be Tamarix (Angiosperm: Tamaricacea). Imago moths were collected in March, June, August and October in Southwestern United States.

  • Distribution. North Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Sudan) and the Middle East (Egypt, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran) to Pakistan (ftp.funet.fi Feb. 27 2017; Sattler 1976). United States (Cochise and Yuma Counties in Arizona, Clark County in Nevada, and Brewster County in Texas).

  • Fig. 11.

    Distribution map of Ornativalva erubescens. Blue dots indicate occurrences in the United States

    f11_141.jpg

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Ole Karsholt (Natural History Museum of Denmark), Klaus Sattler (British Museum Natural History, London) and Eric Metzler (Michigan State University, Alamogordo, New Mexico) for valuable information and comments, David Lees (Natural History Museum, London) for providing type information, and Matthew Chew (Center for Biology and Society, Arizona State University) and Elizabeth Makings (Herbarium Collection, Arizona State University) for their comments on Tamarix species in the United States. Special thanks go to Nico Franz and Andrew Johnston (Hasbrouck Insect Collection, Arizona State University) for their support mentally and physically throughout this project. Also we are thankful for comments from Guanyang Zhang (Hasbrouck Insect Collection, Arizona State University) and anonymous reviewers for their time and efforts, which resulted in an improved manuscript.

    Literature Cited

    1.

    Bidzilya, O.V. 2009. Two new remarkable species of the genus Ornativalva Gozmány, 1955 (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) from Uzbekistan. Zeitschrift Für Entomologie 30(16):265–272.  Google Scholar

    2.

    Bossard, C.C., J.M. Randall, & M.C. Hoshovsky. 2000. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. 1st ed. University of California Press. 360 pp. Google Scholar

    3.

    Chew, M.K. 2009. The Monstering of Tamarisk: How Scientists made a Plant into a Problem. J. Hist. Biol. 42:231–266. Google Scholar

    4.

    Clarke, J.F.G. 1941. The preparation of slides of the genitalia of Lepidoptera. Bull. Brroklyn Entomol. Soc. 36:149–161. Google Scholar

    6.

    Li, H.-H. 1991. A study on the Chinese species of Ornativalva Gozmány (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Entomotax. 13: 87–92. Google Scholar

    7.

    Li, H.-H. & Z.-M. Zheng. 1996. Three New Species and Three New Records of The Genus Ornativalva Gozmány from Xinjiang, China (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Zool. Res. 39:329–336. Google Scholar

    8.

    Li, Z.-Q. & H.-H. Li. 2005. Cladistic biogeography of the genus Ornativalva Gozmány (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Acta Ent. Sinica 48:247–261. Google Scholar

    9.

    Nagler, P.L., E.P. Glenn, C.S. Jarnevich, & P.B. Shafroth. 2011. Distribution and Abundance of Saltcedar and Russian Olive in the Western United States. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30:508–523. Google Scholar

    10.

    Sattler, K. 1964. Ergebnissse der Zoologischen Nubien Expedition 1962. Teil XX, Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae I. Annin. Naturh. Mus. Wien 67:577–578. Google Scholar

    11.

    Sattler, K. 1967. Die Gattungen Ornativalva Gozmány und Horridovalva gen. n. Beitr. naturk. Forsch. SüdwDtl. 26:33–90, pls. 1–19. Google Scholar

    12.

    Sattler, K. 1976. A taxonomic revision of the genus Ornativalva Gozmány, 1955 (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Bull. British Mus. Nat. Hist. Series Entomol. 34:87–152, pls 1–27. Google Scholar

    13.

    Walsingham, L. 1904. Algerian Microlepidoptera. Entomologist's Mon. Mag. 40:214–223, 265–273. Google Scholar
    Sangmi Lee, Ian Watkinson, and James Vargo "Ornativalva erubescens (Walsingham) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Introduced in North America," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 71(3), 141-145, (1 September 2017). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.71i3.a3
    Received: 16 March 2017; Accepted: 11 May 2017; Published: 1 September 2017
    KEYWORDS
    Arizona
    Nevada
    potential biological control
    riparian habitats
    saltcedar
    Tamarix
    Texas
    Back to Top