Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
20 June 2019 The regional, national, and international importance of Louisiana's coastal avifauna
J. V. Remsen, Bryan P. Wallace, Michael A. Seymour, Daniel A. O'Malley, Erik I. Johnson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Coastal Louisiana—and its Mississippi River Delta, in particular—provides large and diverse habitats for many types of birds in North America and beyond. The Mississippi River and its distributaries have shaped Louisiana's unique coast, which includes extensive marsh and marsh islands, sandy barrier headlands and sandy islands, and isolated patches of maritime forest on natural levees, cheniers, and canal spoil banks. Louisiana thus supports large populations of many obligate marsh bird species as well as marine bird species that require islands for breeding sites. Here, we have collated available data and attempt to estimate the breeding population sizes of 17 bird species in coastal Louisiana. We then summarize the importance of the Louisiana coast for these bird species in the contexts of regional, national, and global bird populations. These preliminary estimates indicate that Louisiana's coast supports a high percentage of regional, national, and, in some cases, global populations of several coastal bird species. For example, we estimate that 73% of the United States population of Sandwich Tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis) breeds in Louisiana, and comparable estimates range from 24 to 55% for Mottled Duck (Anas fulvigula), Clapper Rail (Rallus crepitans), Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor), Wilson's Plover (Charadrius wilsonia), Royal Tern (Thalasseus maximus), Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger), and Seaside Sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus). Because most of these other bird species are distributed across state, regional, and national jurisdictions, management of birds and bird habitats in Louisiana has wide-reaching implications for the conservation of these shared natural resources. In this light, this paper is intended to be a resource for managers of avian resources in North America and beyond.

The Mississippi River, the largest river in North America and one of the largest in the world, makes a dramatic imprint on the coastline of the United States. The unique outline of Louisiana's coast (Fig. 1) is created by the protrusion of the Holocene Mississippi River Delta (MRD) into the northern Gulf of Mexico (hereafter nGOM). The MRD, all of which lies within the boundaries of the state of Louisiana, is the fifth-largest delta system on the planet and the largest in the Western Hemisphere (Coleman and Huh 2004). It is flanked to the west by the Chenier Plain, a Holocene formation built from MRD sediments carried by longshore drift combined with sedimentary inputs from smaller coastal plain rivers. Because of its sheer size, as well as the heterogeneity of its coastal habitats, the MRD likely supports the continent's largest populations of the flora and fauna that depend on deltaic habitats, such as coastal marshes and nearshore islands. However, we are unaware of comprehensive analyses that document the comparative importance of coastal Louisiana to other regions in terms of magnitude of biodiversity.

Figure 1

Louisiana coast region, with major localities mentioned in text.

f01_221.jpg

Current population estimates are the cornerstone of any conservation strategy (Soulé 1986); not only do they allow assessment of trends through time, but they also permit evaluation of the consequences of major mortality events. Population estimates at multiple spatial scales (e.g., local, regional, global) are required for evaluating the importance of any region within a species' distribution to the overall population. For North American birds, population estimates of endangered species are routine components of any recovery plan, as they also are for management of game species and certain other species of conservation concern. For the rest of North America's birds, estimates are typically few, coarse, or outdated.

To address this fundamental need, we provide here preliminary population estimates for coastal breeding bird species in the state of Louisiana relative to regional, national, and international estimates for those species. Our primary objectives were (1) to assess Louisiana's relative importance to the conservation of those species on regional to global scales, and (2) to provide baseline data for evaluation of future trends and for assessments of impacts, such as potentially catastrophic events (e.g., oil spills, hurricanes).

We focus on coastal breeding bird species because they are especially susceptible to negative anthropogenic effects, such as coastal land loss, sea level rise, and oil spills (Votier et al. 2005, Erwin et al. 2006a, Bergeron Burns et al. 2012). Nowhere in the United States are these threats more evident than in Louisiana (CPRA 2012). For example, Louisiana's coastline is among the most vulnerable to sea level rise in the nGOM (Pendleton et al. 2010): between 1932 and 2010, 4,877 km2 of land eroded or subsided (Couvillion et al. 2017). Without an aggressive program of restoration and riverine reintroduction, Louisiana is now projected to lose as much as 10,400 km2 (nearly two-thirds of remaining coastal wetlands, including freshwater forested wetlands) over the next 50 yr. Even with current proposed restoration projects in place, nearly half of coastal wetlands could be lost in as little as 50 yr under the highest climate change scenario modelled (CPRA 2012). Furthermore, nearly half of the nGOM shoreline affected by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill was marsh habitat, and approximately 95% of that oiled marsh was in Louisiana (Michel et al. 2013). Louisiana's coastal and offshore zones host infrastructure that supplies 90% of the U.S. outer continental shelf oil and gas resources (CPRA 2012), serving as a reminder of the potential threat of future spills. Natural threats such as hurricanes can also affect coastal nesting bird populations (Leberg et al. 2007); such tropical storms have been shown to impact success of coastal restoration activities in providing habitat for nesting waterbird populations (Raynor et al. 2013, Walter et al. 2013).

Another reason that we focus on species completely or primarily restricted to coastal areas is that their nearly linear ranges naturally limit their population sizes; this makes estimation of population abundances more feasible relative to species with extensive inland distributions that are not subject to the same threats. Although our primary focus is breeding birds, we also briefly summarize information on nonbreeding birds of coastal Louisiana.

We acknowledge significant challenges inherent in synthesizing data from multiple sources, and we describe below our approaches for dealing with these transparently and reasonably. In this vein, we hope that this paper represents a step toward more robust, comprehensive population estimates, and that the results will catalyze more thorough, rigorous survey data and analyses in Louisiana and elsewhere to improve these estimates.

Methods

To provide preliminary population estimates from Louisiana and to compare these to data from other regions, we compiled existing published and unpublished data, and for some species, generated new population estimates using other techniques ( see Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)). We acknowledge that our estimates and the degree of uncertainty associated with them vary widely among species. We describe our approach below, with greater methodological detail in the Supplement.

Selection of species

We restrict our estimates to those species or subspecies that breed in Louisiana exclusively or primarily on the coastline, offshore islands, or in salt or brackish to intermediate marshes. Thus, many coastal breeders that also regularly occur farther inland (i.e., away from tidal influence) are not included. For example, species (e.g., herons) that also nest in floodplain bottomland forest regions are not included despite their abundance in coastal areas (Michot et al. 2003, Green et al. 2006). To define the list of focal species, we first compiled a list of all species that breed along the coast of Louisiana, from offshore islands to as far inland as the influence of saltwater extends (i.e., intermediate marsh); we hereafter refer to this area as the “coastal zone.” Next, we selected a subset of those species with breeding ranges restricted to the Louisiana coastal zone, using Wiedenfeld and Swan (2000) and our decades of collective personal field experience in Louisiana. From that list of coastal zone breeders, we then excluded the following 5 species because their breeding populations in Louisiana are clearly only a tiny fraction of their North American or global populations: the Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus), the American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus), the Sooty Tern (Onychoprion fuscatus), the Gull-billed Tern (Gelochelidon nilotica), and the Caspian Tern (Hydroprogne caspia).

We made the following additions to our list of focal species. We also searched for subspecies restricted to the coastal zone even if most of the species' population breeds elsewhere. This procedure identified one subspecies of a widespread species that is endemic to the coastal marshes of the nGOM: the subspecies marianae of the Marsh Wren (Cistothorus palustris; Kroodsma and Verner 2014). We also included 3 additional species for which most of Louisiana's breeding population is in the coastal zone, but which also have relatively smaller breeding populations in freshwater habitats farther inland: the Mottled Duck (Anas fulvigula), the Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor), and the Boat-tailed Grackle (Quiscalus major). Finally, we included a population of gulls that has formed on the Chandeleur Islands as a result of hybridization between Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) and Kelp Gull (L. dominicanus) (Dittmann and Cardiff 2005) that is of general biological interest because it represents a potential case of “hybrid speciation.” Our final list of bird species and subspecies included 17 coastal zone breeders (Table 1).

Table 1

Conservation status of bird species whose breeding areas in Louisiana are restricted to the Coastal Zone.

t01_221.gif

Species names follow the American Ornithological Society ( http://checklist.aou.org/), and subspecies names follow Dickinson and Remsen (2013) and Dickinson and Christidis (2014). Designations for Species of Greatest Conservation Need in Louisiana are included (Table 1). Scientific names and detailed methods used to generate population estimates for each species are described in the Supplement.

Data sources

For each focal species or subspecies (Table 1;  see Supplement for scientific names (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)), we searched published literature on population estimates from any portion of their ranges, using several online databases (e.g., SORA [Searchable Ornithological Research Archive:  https://sora.unm.edu/], Birds of North America [ http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/]), and online search engines (e.g., Web of Science, Google Scholar). We also incorporated unpublished survey data for some species from the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Natural Heritage and Waterfowl programs, the Texas Colonial Waterbird Society database, and the Florida Shorebird Database (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 2016), from other state natural resource agency databases, and in some cases data from eBird ( http://ebird.org/content/ebird). We also contacted colleagues in other organizations to obtain additional unpublished survey data for some species (see Acknowledgments). Because all bird populations are subject to external drivers—some recognized and others unknown—population trends can fluctuate annually, be stable, or demonstrate unidirectional change over time depending on the population and drivers. To reflect this variation, each population estimate is annotated with survey year(s). These datasets and survey inventories are in many cases the same as those in the Birds of North America species accounts, regional (Portnoy 1977, 1978; Keller et al. 1984, Spendelow and Patton 1988, Martin and Lester 1990, Visser and Peterson 1994, Michot et al. 2003, Fontenot et al. 2012) and national waterbird and shorebird conservation plans (Brown et al. 2001, Hunter et al. 2006), and even international conservation plans (Wetlands International 2012). Our assessment of these datasets and survey initiatives goes beyond those plans to include the most recent population estimates available, and also puts them in context of state, regional, national, and international relevance. Each of these scales has distinct and important regulatory and conservation planning implications. By combining these multiple data sources, and as long as a 40 yr timespan of estimates in most species treated here, we evaluate broad population changes and shifts, even if at a coarse and qualitative level.

Special cases

For 4 saltmarsh species lacking population census data (i.e., Willet [Tringa semipalmata], Clapper Rail [Rallus crepitans], marianae Marsh Wren, and Seaside Sparrow [Ammodramus maritimus]), we estimated populations for each Gulf and Atlantic U.S. state using the following 3 approaches, which we summarize here (see  species accounts in Supplement for additional details (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)). First, for marianae Marsh Wren, we extrapolated population size from published estimates of home range size to the extent of suitable habitat. Second, for Clapper Rail and Seaside Sparrow, we extrapolated population size from breeding density estimates to the extent of suitable habitat. Habitat quality—which affects home range size and bird density—is not equivalent across the range, and plant assemblages in tidal marshes may vary greatly across the region (Hester et al. 2005), thereby potentially affecting home range size and bird density. As such, we considered the variation of published density estimates for Clapper Rail and Seaside Sparrow by conducting a t-test to determine whether nGOM estimates differed from Atlantic Coast estimates. Based on this test, we either pooled density estimates across the 2 regions (in Clapper Rail) or treated them separately (in Seaside Sparrow) to estimate population size based on the potential area of suitable habitat (±95% CI). Third, for Willet, we used the relative availability of suitable habitat across states for comparison and estimated state-by-state population size from 2 data sources: (1) a global population estimate (Andres et al. 2012), and (2) density estimates generated from point counts in the northern Atlantic states (Wiest et al. 2016).

To estimate the potential area of suitable habitat for these 4 marsh species, we followed a 2-step process. First, we calculated the area of predicted distribution from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Program (GAP) for each Gulf and Atlantic state in the species' range (USGS 2013). The GAP model did not consider salinity as a limiting parameter and thus overestimates the distribution of the 3 primarily saltmarsh-dwelling species (Willet, Clapper Rail, Seaside Sparrow) by including them in freshwater and saltwater marshes. Second, therefore, we removed freshwater marsh areas from these distributions as defined by the National Wetlands Inventory database (USFWS 2016) as “freshwater emergent wetland,” “freshwater forested/shrub wetland,” “freshwater pond,” “lake,” or “riverine.” We then used the remaining saltwater distribution and, based on the literature review of published estimates described above, we extrapolated the population size (±95% CI) in each state from Texas to Maine. Marsh Wren extends into coastal freshwater wetlands, so we retained these habitat categories in estimating the potential suitable habitat area.

Uncertainty and caveats

It is important to recognize that our estimates are preliminary in most cases, because estimating absolute sizes of populations of breeding birds, even when some data are available, is very difficult. Although attempts at regional counts extend back into the 1970s (Portnoy 1977, 1978), methodologies across states, time, and species have not been standardized. Coastal habitats, and the birds that depend on them, are also naturally dynamic systems, with erosion and storms constantly reshaping the landscape. Human modification of these habitats, both in positive and negative ways, also contributes to local and regional shifts in coastal bird populations (Frederick and Ogden 1997). Our compilation should be considered as approximations subject to major modification with additional data; every estimate has these implicit caveats. Nevertheless, we regard these as reasonable estimates given the data available, but cautionary wording is appropriate for figures cited in the report and the Supplement, where the details are given for each estimate of breeding populations.

Results

General results

Breeding population estimates for Louisiana (presented as the number of breeding individuals— males and females—unless otherwise noted) for the target species ranged from 130 (Reddish Egret) to 3.57 million (Seaside Sparrow). The contributions of Louisiana's populations to those across the nGOM are estimated to represent from as low as 5% (Reddish Egret) to as high as 83% (Sandwich Tern) and 100% (“Chandeleur Gull”). At the scale of the eastern United States as a whole, Louisiana estimates range from 4% (Reddish Egret) to 73% (Sandwich Tern) and 77% (marianae Marsh Wren) of total abundance. Percent representations of global populations were more often incalculable because estimates were less readily available at that scale. However, one example—the Seaside Sparrow—showed that Louisiana accounts for about 55% of the species' global abundance. In other cases, population estimates of hemispheric-scale subspecies were possible—for example, Louisiana supports 26% of the New World Royal Tern (Thalasseus m. maxima) and 70% of the New World Sandwich Tern (“Cabot's Tern,” T. s. acuflavidus) populations. The derivations of these estimates are described below.

Colonial-nesting waterbirds of coastal islands

Species in this category are those that breed in colonies on islands along the coast. Coastal Louisiana has a unique system of islands that supports some of the largest colonies of waterbirds in the United States. From large barrier islands, such as those in the Isles Dernieres (Raccoon Island, ∼60 ha) and the Chandeleurs (collectively more than 400 ha), to small coastal marsh islands and shell keys such as Queen Bess in Barataria Bay (∼8 ha), the Louisiana coast provides a large number and diversity of islands (Visser and Peterson 1994, Visser et al. 2005, Walter et al. 2013, Curtiss and Pierce 2016, Selman et al. 2016). Many species of coastal waterbirds require isolated islands for nest sites for protection from predators, particularly mammals, and many waterbird species are wholly dependent on such islands for successful reproduction (e.g., Visser et al. 2005, Raynor et al. 2012b). In particular, Louisiana's barrier and coastal islands are the only suitable nesting habitat for several species, many of which are Species of Greatest Conservation Need in Louisiana (Holcomb et al. 2015), a fact that cannot be overemphasized. Because these coastal islands are limited in size and host significant concentrations of species and individuals in small areas, the colonies are especially vulnerable to human disturbance, oil spills, relative sea level rise, land loss, and tropical cyclones.

Population estimates of colonial nesters are generally more accurate than those of any other coastal waterbirds because their breeding populations congregate at relatively few nesting areas, thus facilitating surveys. However, as we point out below, colony estimates typically include only nesting individuals and not nonbreeders. Also, surveys of colonies are often conducted from aircraft; this technique, particularly with rotary-wing aircraft, is most effective for surveying species that are visually conspicuous (i.e., those with high contrast between plumage aspects and nesting substrates) and least effective at detecting species that are rare, small, or low contrast (Rodgers et al. 2005, Green et al. 2008). Details for each species follow.

Brown Pelican—We estimate that Louisiana's breeding population of 35,000 Brown Pelicans accounts for approximately 33% of the breeding population of the eastern United States and 47% of the population of the nGOM (Table 2). Louisiana has considerably more breeding birds than any other state, with roughly 14,000 more individuals than Texas, the state with the second-largest breeding population. Brown Pelican populations are generally rebounding from lows (and the cessation of breeding) recorded in the 1960s during the height of impacts of the DDT era (Williams and Martin 1968, King et al. 1977, USFWS 2009, Shields 2014). After the banning of DDT in 1972 and diligent reintroduction and conservation efforts, we estimate the total global population to be 418,000, slightly higher than other recent estimates (e.g., Wetlands International 2012, Shields 2014). Nonetheless, this species remains highly susceptible to mortality due to pesticides, oiling, and natural and anthropogenic disturbances of nesting colonies. For example, the DWH Trustees estimated a loss of ∼12,000–27,000 Brown Pelicans caused by the DWH spill (DWH NRDA Trustees 2016). The Brown Pelican is also the official “state bird” of Louisiana and thus has special cultural and management significance.

Table 2

Breeding population abundance (number of breeding individuals, males and females) for selected bird species of the Louisiana coast and the proportion this represents of total population abundance at the scales of the nGOM, the eastern United States, and globally for each species. Species are listed in order of national importance of the Louisiana coastal zone breeding population (% eastern U.S. population in Louisiana). For species for which estimates are given as ranges, the midpoint is used here. For species in which the estimates are restricted to a single subspecies, the subspecies are listed next to the species name.  See Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx) for all calculations.

t02_221.gif

Royal Tern—We estimate that Louisiana's breeding population of 50,000 Royal Terns represents ∼51% of the breeding population of the nGOM, 30% of the breeding population of the eastern United States, and 26% of the global population of T. m. maxima. Louisiana has more breeding birds than any other state (by 15,000 birds) and is clearly the most important place worldwide for breeding populations of this species, which are concentrated in the southeastern United States. Thus, Louisiana's population is critical to this species as a whole. Although the Royal Tern is not a species of global conservation concern, its total population is rather small (∼191,350; Supplement). From 2,900 to 5,000 Royal Terns were killed by the DWH oil spill (DWH NRDA Trustees 2016).

Sandwich Tern—Along with the Royal Tern, with which it breeds sympatrically, nesting Sandwich Terns require sandy islands free of mammalian predators (Raynor et al. 2012b, Owen and Pierce 2014). We estimate that Louisiana's breeding population of more than 75,000 Sandwich Terns represents 73% of the breeding population of the United States and 83% of the nGOM population. Louisiana has by far the largest population of Sandwich Terns in any state, with about 6 times the population of Texas, the state with the second-highest population. Louisiana's population experiences dramatic fluctuations, making it difficult to determine long-term trends, which contributes substantially to great uncertainty in regional and global population estimates. The Chandeleur Islands supported the largest breeding colonies in the world during the 1980s and 1990s (Spendelow and Patton 1988, USFWS 2013), at least prior to recent hurricane damage to the islands (e.g., Katrina in 2005). As many as 46,613 nests were counted on a single island in the Chandeleurs (Stake Island; Purrington 1988) and over 90,000 nests in 1994 at Breton National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) before these islands were devastated by hurricanes. A nest count in 2011 detected over 70,000 Sandwich Tern nests at Breton NWR, about 5 times as many as any other count between 2005 and 2012 (USFWS 2013). Although the Sandwich Tern is not a species of global conservation concern, its total population is relatively small for a seabird. Up to 1,000 Sandwich Terns were killed by the DWH spill (DWH NRDA Trustees 2016), and Louisiana populations are likely critical to the population as a whole. Three subspecies exist: one in Europe, one in the southern Caribbean, and one that breeds in Mexico, Greater Antilles, and the United States, including in Louisiana, T. s. acuflavidus; this subspecies is treated as a separate species (“Cabot's Tern”) by some (Sangster et al. 2011). Estimates of the population sizes of eurygnatha in the south Caribbean and South America are smaller than those for acuflavidus, with 53,400–58,400 individuals, whereas Old World sandvicensis has 171,000–307,000 (Wetlands International 2012).

Black Skimmer—We estimate that Louisiana's breeding population of about 10,000 Black Skimmers represents about 26% of the breeding population of the United States and 44% of that of the nGOM. Although not as high a percentage as the previous 3 species, at one time the largest single colony known was on East Timbalier Island (Clapp et al. 1983). Louisiana's population is higher than that of any other state. Like the previous 3 species, Black Skimmer is a Species of Greatest Conservation Need in Louisiana, and it is on the endangered or threatened lists of several other states. The species showed worrisome population declines in the United States through the 1970s but may have stabilized (Gochfeld and Burger 1994). Regional concerns continue following several years of low productivity on the central Texas coast (D. Newstead, pers. comm.) and elsewhere because of human disturbance and overwash events during tropical cyclones and other weather systems during the breeding season. Louisiana colonies are also prone to failure from overwash events (Owen and Pierce 2013). In addition, 1,500–2,700 Black Skimmers were killed by the DWH spill (DWH NRDA Trustees 2016). Therefore, the Black Skimmer was chosen as a focal species for the Gulf Coast Vulnerability Assessment, which focused largely on the effects of sea level rise and climate change (Watson et al. 2015). With a total population estimate of only ∼39,000 birds in the United States, the population is small, which imparts an additional level of vulnerability. Unlike most other seabirds that rely on islands for nesting, the Black Skimmer may occasionally use urban rooftops and mainland beaches, although productivity may be reduced in such situations (Furfey 2014). Furthermore, small islands created from dredge material can rival large barrier island systems in meeting breeding habitat requirements for nest success (Mallach and Leberg 1999, Owen and Pierce 2013).

Laughing Gull—We estimate Louisiana's breeding population of Laughing Gulls to be ∼100,000; this total is lower than that in Texas but higher than that in Florida (the other 2 main breeding concentrations in the nGOM). This represents about 33% of the Gulf and 21% of the eastern U.S. population ( see Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)). The Laughing Gull is not generally a species of conservation concern, and, in some circumstances, particularly where populations are increased by human influences, it may be advisable to reduce populations because the species is a nest predator of birds of conservation concern (Hunter et al. 2006). It typically thrives in coastal areas with high human populations, where it takes advantage of anthropogenic sources of food such as refuse dumps, fisheries bycatch, and fish-cleaning operations. The Laughing Gull may be especially prone to oiling; it was the most frequently collected species during the DWH oil spill of 2010; 23,000–37,000 Laughing Gulls were killed by direct oiling or eliminated by reduced productivity through 2011 (DWH NRDA Trustees 2016).

Chandeleur Gull''—The “Chandeleur Gull” is a hybrid swarm between Herring and Kelp gulls that has been present for ∼20 yr on the Chandeleurs (Dittmann and Cardiff 2005). It is the only such swarm in the world (although a few breeding attempts have been noted in coastal Alabama; McConnell 2010) and potentially represents an important biological event, namely speciation through hybridization (Ottenburghs et al. 2016). Louisiana's population of “Chandeleur Gull” represents 100% of the world's known breeding population. Adults attending juveniles and active nests were observed by MAS, DAO, and JVR in the Chandeleurs in 2015.

Additional species—Louisiana islands also support breeding colonies of the Gull-billed Tern (Gelochelidon nilotica; ∼800 individuals) and the Caspian Tern (Hydroprogne caspia; ∼850 individuals), as well as some of the only breeding Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) in the nGOM (66 birds in 2015; Louisiana Natural Heritage Program [LNHP] data). Curlew Island in the Chandeleurs formerly supported (e.g., Purrington 1970) the only breeding population of Sooty Terns (Onychoprion fuscatus) in the United States other than those on the Dry Tortugas off Florida and locally the Texas coast. However, the Louisiana population effectively disappeared after Hurricane Georges ravaged Curlew Island in 1998; they have not recolonized, although one individual was observed at a nest scrape there in 2015 (MAS). Also, 3 nesting pairs were recently discovered in the Isles Dernieres in Terrebonne Parish (Raynor et al. 2012a).

Birds of coastal marshes

Here we define “coastal marsh” as the emergent wetland adjacent to the coastline. The marsh itself may be any of 4 categories (saline, brackish, intermediate, fresh) depending on its proximity to freshwater outflow, especially the Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers (Chabreck 1972, Sasser et al. 2013). Louisiana has one the largest expanses of saline, brackish, and intermediate marshes of anywhere in the world, and the largest by far of any state in the eastern United States (Fig. 2), representing 46% of 2.3 × 106 ha of what we reference as “saltmarsh” in the conterminous United States (Stedman and Dahl 2008). Calculations of the acreage in Louisiana (from Sasser et al. 2013) are as follows: saline (∼295,000 ha), brackish marsh (∼404,000 ha), intermediate marsh (∼380,000 ha), and fresh marsh (∼387,000 ha). In this paper, we focus primarily on estuarine saltmarsh (saline, brackish, and intermediate marsh) because it supports 3 Species of Greatest Conservation Need in Louisiana that are saltmarsh specialists, although we did include coastal freshwater habitats used by Mottled Duck, marianae Marsh Wren, and Boat-tailed Grackle in total population estimates. Based on the National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS 2016) estimate of the area of estuarine saltmarsh habitat, Louisiana has 26% more saltmarsh than any other state (Florida is second) and 27% of the total saltmarsh area in the eastern United States.

Figure 2

Extent of coastal marsh (black) in northern Gulf of Mexico.

f02_221.jpg

Clapper Rail—Louisiana supports globally important populations of the Clapper Rail, a species restricted to salt and brackish marshes. It is also a game bird in Louisiana, and so has direct economic importance in terms of hunter-generated revenue (Eddleman et al. 1988). Because this habitat is restricted to a narrow and patchily distributed linear strip along the coast, the total population of this habitat specialist is small. Based on extrapolations of published density estimates to extent of suitable habitat, we estimate that the Louisiana population of Clapper Rails is ∼884,000 individuals ( Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)). Louisiana supports ∼38% of all Clapper Rails in the eastern United States and 70% more individuals of this species than does any other state (Florida is second) because of the relatively large and continuous area of suitable habitat. Although our analysis focuses only on the eastern United States and nGOM population, the species as a whole breeds from Massachusetts to Mexico and the West Indies. The subspecies that breeds in Louisiana, R. c. saturatus, is found only in the nGOM, from Alabama to northeastern Mexico. Therefore, Louisiana has a very high percentage, probably at least 50%, of the global population of this subspecies.

Seaside Sparrow—This is one of only a few bird species that is nearly endemic to the United States. Because this species is almost identical in habitat requirements and range to the Clapper Rail, the main difference in the calculations is in their relatively higher density. About 56% of the U.S. population occurs in Louisiana, with ∼3.57 million birds ( Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)). Louisiana has about 4 times as many individuals as any other state (Texas is second) because of the large and continuous area of suitable habitat. Our calculations exclude A. m. sennetti, a rare and poorly known subspecies from south Texas and northeast Mexico; although this inflates Louisiana's importance, it does so only slightly, because the population of A. m. sennetti may number only in the tens of thousands. The subspecies that breeds in Louisiana, A. m. fisheri, is restricted to the north-central GOM, from Alabama to central Texas. Therefore, Louisiana has roughly 75% of the global population of this subspecies.

Mottled Duck—This species is largely restricted to coastal areas of the nGOM and the southern Atlantic Coast. As such, it has one of the smallest breeding ranges of any North American waterfowl species. In Louisiana, ∼70% of the estimated population of Louisiana's 77,500 birds breed in coastal marshes, where found in marshes of all salinities ( Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)). We estimate that populations in coastal Louisiana marshes represent roughly 28% of the population in the United States and about 48% of the United States population of the western subspecies A. f. maculosa, which recent data suggest may be a separate species from the Florida population, A. f. fulvigula (McCracken et al. 2001).

Marsh Wren (subspecies marianae)—Although the Marsh Wren is widespread in North America, some of its subspecies have narrow, linear distributions along coastlines. One of those is C. p. marianae, found only on the coastline of the nGOM, from eastern Texas to central Florida, with the highest densities perhaps found in fresh to brackish marshes, where it occupies Phragmites and other tall, emergent vegetation (Kroodsma and Verner 2014). Because of its linear distribution, the total global population of this subspecies must be relatively small. Furthermore, in our experience, densities of C. p. marianae are much lower than those of subspecies of inland freshwater marshes away from the nGOM. Unfortunately, our estimates of total population size for this subspecies are very crude, relying on only a few available estimates of bird density and territory size in conjunction with the USGS Gap Analysis (USGS 2013) distribution model for this species, and balanced against PIFSC (2013) estimates. Nevertheless, we estimate that Louisiana has roughly 93,350 individuals, which represents ∼77% of the world population of this subspecies.

Boat-tailed Grackle—Like the Seaside Sparrow, the Boat-tailed Grackle is one of only a few bird species that is endemic to the United States, where it breeds from Connecticut (Mantlik et al. 1998) to eastern Texas. Although common within most of its range, often thriving in areas affected by humans, its total world population is relatively small because of its linear, coastal distribution. Population estimates are difficult because the species is colonial or semi-colonial and are only available through the PIFSC (2013) database, which estimates 400,000 individuals in Louisiana, about 22% of the world population. Louisiana's population is second only to Florida, which is likely the core of the species' distribution, with 66% of the world population. Thus, other states contribute relatively little to the world population. The subspecies that breeds in Louisiana, Quiscalus major major, is found only in Louisiana and eastern Texas. We estimate that Louisiana supports 82% of this subspecies' population.

Additional species—Non-focal species that are not coastal marsh specialists but that have substantial breeding populations in that habitat are the Pied-billed Grebe (Podilymbus podiceps), the Common Gallinule (Gallinula galeata), the Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), the Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus; mostly in Phragmites), and the Orchard Oriole (Icterus spurius; primarily in Phragmites). Also, the Green Heron (Butorides virescens) nests in coastal marshes, sometimes in high densities, and uses this habitat extensively for foraging during the breeding season (Folkerts 2015).

Birds of other nearshore habitats

Here we define “nearshore habitat” as the area extending from the outer edge of the marsh to the seaward edge of the continental shelf waters. Therefore, it includes mudflats at the marsh's edge, pools and channels within the marsh, beaches, estuaries, and Gulf waters from the beach line to the continental shelf. Note that most of the species in the “Colonial-nesting waterbirds of coastal islands” section above feed in these habitats. Therefore, this section concentrates on the species that do not require islands for nesting.

All bird species that nest in the island colonies (see “Colonial-nesting waterbirds of coastal islands” section above) feed in Louisiana's nearshore waters and are prominent members of the shoreline ecosystem. The islands would be useless for breeding unless embedded in a matrix of healthy and productive nearshore habitat to support the energetic demands associated with successful nesting (Liechty et al. 2016). The productivity of this nearshore habitat is also important to colonial island–nesters for postbreeding habitat for molting and pre-migratory fattening for migratory species (e.g., Sandwich Tern) and for year-round nonbreeding habitat for the permanent residents.

In addition to the colonial nesters on islands, Louisiana's nearshore habitats support nationally important populations of the following species, almost all of which also breed to some extent on islands.

Reddish Egret—Because of the linear nature of this species' habitat and the constant loss or disturbance of such habitat throughout its range, the Reddish Egret is the rarest heron species in the United States; the Reddish Egret Working Group believes that the world population consists of only 5,000–7,000 individuals (Wilson et al. 2014). It is the only heron in the Western Hemisphere restricted to the immediate coast and is a critically imperiled resident of the narrow strip of coastal habitat in Louisiana. This egret nests within colonies of other species of herons, usually on islands, and feeds primarily in clear shallow waters with hard bottoms adjacent to coastal marsh. We estimate that Louisiana has ∼130 breeding birds (∼4% of the U.S. breeding population of 3,000 birds). As many as 40 Reddish Egrets were killed by the DWH oil spill (DWH NRDA Trustees 2016), which would represent about 28% of the Louisiana and Alabama population combined ( see Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)).

Wilson's Plover—The Wilson's Plover breeds in a narrow linear zone of habitat along the coast where beaches meet areas with some vegetation cover; this habitat has undergone dramatic losses over the last several decades because of beach development and increased human use of beaches for recreation (Zdravkovic 2013). Louisiana's estimated 2,550 breeding birds represents ∼31% of the U.S. breeding population and 43% of the nGOM population. No other state except perhaps Texas has more breeding Wilson's Plovers, and Louisiana has 2 of the 4 sites ranked as Globally Important by Zdravkovic (2013). The U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan lists this as a Species of High Concern, and it appears to be experiencing a population decline in the United States (Andres et al. 2012). Because of the linear nature of this species' habitat, the total world population is undoubtedly very small despite the large geographic range. Zdravkovic (2013) suggested a global population of only ∼29,000 birds, which would mean that Louisiana's population represents 9% of the global population.

Forster's Tern—Virtually all of Louisiana's population of the Forster's Tern breeds in the coastal zone, and a substantial but unknown percentage of that population forages in nearshore waters and nests in places such as spoil banks adjacent to the coast. Wrack lines within marsh islands are clearly favored based on LNHP aerial surveys (MAS). The Louisiana population represents about 17% of the national population and 71% of the nGOM population; thus, Louisiana is certainly one of the most important states for this species.

Willet—The coastal subspecies (Tringa s. semipalmata) of the Willet is narrowly distributed along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts and may be a separate species from the more widespread interior form (T. s. inornata) (see Oswald et al. 2016). It requires a mix of salt or brackish marsh and vegetated beach for nest sites and mudflat and beach for feeding. The percentage of the world population that breeds in Louisiana is unknown, but is likely substantial because so much of the Louisiana coast is suitable breeding habitat (in contrast to the scarcity of marsh on the coastlines of so many other states). Andres et al. (2012) suggested a global (U.S. and Canada) population of ∼90,000 birds for T. s. semipalmata. Morrison et al. (2001) suggested that 10% of the North American Willet population is in Canada (which likely includes T. s. inornata), but Erskine's (1992) census data of coastal T. s. semipalmata suggests that the proportion of this subspecies' population in Canada is closer to 2%. An unknown portion of the population also breeds in the Bahamas and Greater Antilles, but we assume that it is about 40% based on crude comparisons of extent of coastlines. Thus, the same crude assumptions suggest roughly 55% of the population is in the United States. Although population densities are not readily available, we calculated a suitable habitat area of 2.6 × 106 ha from Maine to Texas, suggesting an average of 0.19 birds/ha across the range if using the Andres et al. (2012)population estimate. This would translate to about 17,000 birds in Louisiana. Wiest et al. (2016) estimated 117,000 Willets (95% CI=88,000–146,000) from Delaware Bay to northern Maine based on longterm point-count data, about 15 times higher for the region than expected based on Andres et al.'s (2012) population estimate. Considering this discrepancy, it is possible that by extrapolating estimates reported by Wiest et al. (2016), Louisiana may support as many as 256,000 Willets, over an order of magnitude higher than the estimate based Andres et al.'s (2012) global population estimate; this discrepancy requires further research. To be conservative, we used Andres et al.'s (2012) estimate.

Least Tern—Louisiana's Least Tern populations consist of a coastal breeding population (S. a. antillarum) and a much smaller interior population (S. a. athalassos) that is federally endangered and breeds on river islands along the Mississippi, Red, Missouri, and other rivers. The former nests in colonies primarily on the mainland coast in areas with extensive sandy beaches and overwash fans, making it a classic early successional species that relies mainly on recent disturbance rather than isolation to reduce predation pressure on nesting success. Thus, in many ways, its nesting habitat is more limited (and much more vulnerable to human disturbance) than that of species restricted to islands. We estimate that Louisiana has roughly 6,000 breeding birds (∼11% of the Atlantic/nGOM breeding population).

Tricolored Heron—Although the Tricolored Heron breeds to varying degrees inland, the center of abundance is in coastal areas. We estimate that Louisiana has 15,000 breeding birds, which represents roughly 24% of the U.S. breeding population and 48% of the nGOM population. Tangentially, this adds validity to the original English name for this species, Louisiana Heron, which was in universal use until 1982. This species appears to have experienced a substantial decline in Louisiana since the 1970s, when Louisiana's coastal marshes contributed to about 72% of the United States population (Portnoy 1977, Frederick 2013). Although modest population increases since the 1970s have occurred along the Atlantic, this has not offset substantial declines in the nGOM ( Supplement (221-wils-131-02-01_s01.docx)).

Additional species—Other species of herons, ibises, and waterbirds commonly nest in colonies along the coast, often in wooded nearshore islands (thus some populations could be included in “Colonial-nesting waterbirds of coastal islands” section above), but they also have substantial inland breeding populations (Michot et al. 2003).

Importance of coastal Louisiana for nonbreeding birds

Although this paper focuses only on the bird species more or less restricted to Louisiana's coast, it is obvious to any naturalist who has visited Louisiana that, during migration and winter, coastal habitats also support exceptionally high numbers of shorebirds, waterfowl, and other waterbirds that depend on this ecosystem. Therefore, in this section, we discuss the importance of coastal Louisiana to wintering and migratory bird species.

Wintering birds—Population estimates for the most common wintering waterfowl in the Southeast Zone of Louisiana only (based on the 3 mostrecent years of Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries [LDWF] surveys) are as follows: Gadwall (Anas strepera; 506,000), Ring-necked Duck (Aythya collaris; 241,000), Green-winged Teal (Anas crecca; 206,000), Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis; 162,000), Canvasback (Aythya valisineria; 84,000), Northern Pintail (Anas acuta; 69,000), Blue-winged Teal (Anas discolor; 30,000), American Wigeon (Anas penelope; 19,000), Northern Shoveler (Anas clypeata; 14,000), and Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; 14,000).

In addition to wintering waterfowl, coastal Louisiana provides habitat for several species of migratory and wintering shorebirds. More than 10,000 ha of (nonbreeding) Critical Habitat has been designated in Louisiana for the federally Threatened and Endangered Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus). The average annual count of nonbreeding Piping Plovers in Louisiana is ∼250 individuals (LNHP, unpublished data from 1991 to 2014; 11 survey years; high count of 750 in 1991). Because the geographic extent of surveys varied greatly year to year, typically at the expense of the Chandeleur Islands, actual populations are likely much higher than the averages given. For example, in 1991, almost half of the 750 birds were detected in the Chandeleurs (LNHP, unpublished data). Population estimates are not yet available for other shorebirds (Charadrii), but are likely in the 10,000–100,000 range for the Dunlin (Calidris alpina), the Sanderling (C. alba), the Western Sandpiper (C. mauri), and the Short-billed Dowitcher (Limnodromus griseus); and in the 1,000–10,000 range for the Semipalmated Plover (Charadrius semipalmatus), the Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola), the American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana), the Least Sandpiper (Calidris minutilla), the Red Knot (C. canutus rufa; federal status = Threatened; Endangered status under evaluation), and the Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa).

Other bird species also rely on coastal Louisiana for wintering habitat. A substantial proportion of the U.S. population of the American White Pelican (Pelecanus erythrorhynchos) may winter in nearshore habitat in Louisiana, and the Louisiana coast also may harbor important wintering populations of the Common Loon (Gavia immer). A high proportion of the U.S. population of the formerly Endangered Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) almost certainly passes through the Louisiana coast during migration, and perhaps hundreds overwinter there. Our preliminary calculations of wintering populations of the Nelson's Sparrow (Ammodramus nelsoni) indicate that a substantial percentage of the world's population winters in Louisiana coastal marshes. In winter and spring, the offshore waters support a fairly large population of the Northern Gannets (Morus bassanus) from eastern Canadian breeding grounds (Montevecchi et al. 2012).

Migratory birds—Louisiana's Gulf Coast is legendary for its abundance and diversity of migratory birds (Lowery 1974). For bird species migrating to and from their tropical wintering grounds, the Louisiana coastline provides critical stopover habitat (Gauthreaux 1992, Moore et al. 1993, Dobbs et al. 2009). Aquatic habitats along the coast support large numbers of migratory sandpipers, plovers, waterfowl, terns and gulls, and herons (e.g., Withers 2002, Curtis and Pierce 2016); although census data are not available, these transient populations likely number in the hundreds of thousands to, in some cases, millions of individuals. A substantial percentage of North America's migratory Peregrine Falcons and Merlins also feed on these migratory waterbirds as they make their way to and from wintering grounds along the coast.

The first wooded habitats inland from the immediate coast in the nGOM may be the most important stopover habitat in the world for migratory landbirds (Mehlman et al. 2005, Cohen et al. 2017). The abundance and richness of migrant landbird species that rely on these rare and imperiled coastal woodlands (i.e., cheniers and maritime forest) and coastal shrub–scrub are well known. Each day during spring, one million or more individual birds of up to ∼100 species use this habitat for refueling and resting during migration (Gauthreaux 1971). The maritime forests provide critical refueling habitat for migrating landbirds (e.g., Moore et al. 2005). The persistence of these vital habitats depends on the adjacent coastal marsh and beach for buffering them from salt spray, storm surge, saltwater intrusion, and erosion; these habitats also depend upon adoption of sustainable use, particularly by those who graze livestock.

Discussion

The MRD, which is entirely contained within Louisiana's borders, supports the largest area of coastal marsh in North America and one of the largest in the world (Coleman and Huh 2004, Couvillion et al. 2017). Consequently, the richness and abundance of birds that inhabit coastal marsh is matched nowhere in the United States. This paper represents the first attempt to compile available data on a wide range of birds that breed in coastal Louisiana and to put those comprehensive population estimates in regional, national, and global contexts. Our results demonstrate that Louisiana's contribution to these species is significant: the state hosts up to two-thirds of the regional and global abundance of some species. We also outline the importance of the Louisiana coast to a broader range of nonbreeding birds as well.

Our estimates document the exceptional value of Louisiana's coastal zone to the overall abundance of several bird species across taxonomic groups. This is especially important because the Louisiana coast, particularly the deltaic portion, is subject to major natural and anthropogenic threats. Land loss due to subsidence, sea level rise, and erosion, coupled with the significant reduction of natural sediment deposition from the channelization and flood control and navigation projects of the Mississippi River, has dramatically decreased the areal extent of habitats (CPRA 2012). The development of roads, canals, and other infrastructure has further accelerated land loss and saltwater intrusion by altering the coastal hydrology and patterns of sediment deposition (Boesch et al. 1994). In addition to the catastrophic consequences of major oil and chemical spills, such as the DWH oil spill, the omnipresent potential for pollution and contamination of the coast because of the proliferation of industrial activities make the entire ecosystem vulnerable to chronic low-level perturbation (CPRA 2012, DWH NRDA Trustees 2016). Formation of hypoxic zones off the coast due to allochthonous inputs of nutrients and chemicals from the Mississippi River further endangers the integrity of the coastal ecosystems (Rabalais et al. 2001, 2002). The major international shipping traffic to and from the ports of New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and elsewhere through the Mississippi River represents an additional array of chronic anthropogenic disturbances with direct and indirect negative consequences for Louisiana's coastal ecosystems. Therefore, the geographic overlap of these human activities with the presence of some of the most important bird populations in the United States creates a volatile situation that requires long-term monitoring and dynamic management. In addition, already high rates of both natural and anthropogenic subsidence, coupled with chronic sediment starvation, make coastal Louisiana especially vulnerable to sea level rise driven by climate change. For these reasons, management actions in Louisiana should be designed to safeguard or restore bird habitats, which, as shown herein, will have significant implications for the rest of the nGOM and beyond.

Several logical “next steps” emerge clearly from our examination of coastal bird populations in the MRD. Most obviously, refined population estimates and improved survey techniques are badly needed. Use of improved and standardized monitoring protocols is needed among states to identify broad-scale shifts in populations to facilitate conservation planning and prioritization processes. Development of processes to quantify threat levels at the most crucial nesting sites would also benefit conservation planning and aid in the interpretation of population changes.

Although the accuracy of our estimates requires further refining, we predict that the general finding concerning the pivotal position of Louisiana for the population health of coastal bird species will remain robust. Therefore, Louisiana and federal agencies managing birds, habitats, and ecosystem health must recognize their tremendous responsibility for managing these species to sustain regional and global populations. The threats to these species are many, especially habitat loss because of coastal erosion and rising sea levels; these are exacerbated by other anthropogenic effects such as oil spills (e.g., DWH oil spill; DWH NRDA Trustees 2016). Louisiana's 50-year, $50 billion Coastal Master Plan (CPRA 2012) offers a comprehensive approach to restore Louisiana's coastline for protecting human communities and providing wildlife and fisheries habitat. Although the conservation and restoration activities outlined therein for barrier islands, coastal shorelines, and coastal marshes are paramount, to maximize benefits to bird populations, additional strategies should be included that seek to reduce human disturbance, to decrease exposure and vulnerability to oil spills and pollution, and to control populations of predators and invasive species. Furthermore, restoration and creation of small, isolated, predator-free bay islands, not included in the plan because of their high cost for small land areas, are especially important for many colonial waterbird and seabird species (e.g., Wine Island, Terrebonne Parish; Raynor et al. 2012b, Curtiss and Pierce 2016). Beneficial use of dredged material could opportunistically create these habitats to minimize the costly need to stabilize or rebuild existing islands (Leberg et al. 1995). The DWH NRDA Trustees (2016) Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan indicated that over $400 million are allocated to fund these restoration approaches designed to restore the loss of avian species across the nGOM. These and other funding mechanisms (e.g., RESTORE Act, Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund administered by National Fish and Wildlife Foundation) represent important opportunities to ensure healthy bird habitats in Louisiana and the rest of the nGOM.

Ultimately, a suite of conservation strategies, coupled with monitoring and adaptive management of the most critical or sensitive sites, are crucial to sustain these regionally and globally important nesting populations. The estimates that we provide should be a useful resource to managers and decision-makers in the near- and long-term future.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Restore the Mississippi River Delta with support from the Walton Family Foundation. The Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority supported early data compilation work as part of the DWH Natural Resource Damage Assessment. We are grateful to the following for providing data to help with population estimates: L. Addison (Audubon North Carolina), P. Comins (Audubon Connecticut), D. D'Auria (Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife), C. Hand (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources), W. Haskell (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), T. Keyes (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), D. Newstead (Coastal Bends and Bays National Estuary Program), C. Raithel (Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Fish and Wildlife), and L. Welch (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). We thank Diane Callow, Richard E. Gibbons, and Jamie Holmes for comments on the manuscript, and Mary Huisenga, Ian Lipton, and Andrew McFadden for their assistance with compiling and reviewing the population data used in our analyses. Louis Bevier alerted us to a key reference. Two anonymous reviewers were especially helpful in improving the manuscript and alerting us to important publications.

Literature cited

1.

Alvo R, McNicholl MK. 1996. Status report on the Forster's Tern Sterna forsteri in Canada. Ottawa (ON): Commission on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Google Scholar

2.

Anderson DW, Henny CJ, Godinez-Reyes C, Gress F, Palacios EL, et al. 2007. Size of the California Brown Pelican metapopulation during a non–el Niño year. Reston (VA): U.S. Geological Survey. Open-file report 2007-1299. Google Scholar

3.

Anderson DW, Henny CJ, Godinez-Reyes C, Gress F, Palacios EL, et al. 2013. Size and distribution of the California Brown Pelican metapopulation in a non-ENSO year. Marine Ornithology 41:95–106. Google Scholar

4.

Andres BA, Smith PA, Morrison RIG, Gratto-Trevor CL, Brown SC, Friis CA. 2012. Population estimates of North American shorebirds, 2012. Wader Study Group Bulletin 119:178–194. Google Scholar

5.

Ballard BM, Merendino MT, Terry RH, Tacha TC. 2001. Estimating abundance of breeding Mottled Ducks in Texas. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:1186–1192. Google Scholar

6.

Beck RA, Akers JW, Via JW, Williams B. 1990. Status and distribution of the Least Tern in Virginia; 1975 to 1988. Virginia Journal of Science 41:404–418. Google Scholar

7.

Belant JL, Dolbeer RA. 1993. Population status of nesting Laughing Gulls in the United States: 1977–1991. American Birds 47:220–224. Google Scholar

8.

Bergeon Burns CM, Olin JA, Woltmann S, Stouffer PC, Taylor SS. 2012. Effects of oil on terrestrial vertebrates: Predicting impacts of the Macondo Blowout. BioScience 64:820–828. Google Scholar

9.

Bielefeld RR, Cox RR Jr. 2008. Mottled Duck survey report. St. Petersburg (FL): Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Commission. Google Scholar

10.

Birdlife International. 2010. Species factsheet: Sternula antillarum [cited 7 Jun 2010].  www.birdlife.org, cited in FWC 2011b. Google Scholar

11.

Blacklock GW, Blankinship DR, Kennedy S, King KA, Paul RT, et al. 1978. Texas colonial waterbird census, 1973–1976. Austin (TX): Texas Parks & Wildlife Department F.A. Report Series no. 15. Google Scholar

12.

Boesch DF, Josselyn MN, Mehta AJ, Morris JT, Nuttle WK, et al. 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 20:1–103. Google Scholar

13.

Brinker DF, McCann JM, Williams B, Watts BD. 2007. Colonial-nesting seabirds in the Chesapeake Bay region: Where have we been and where are we going? Waterbirds 30:93–104. Google Scholar

14.

Brown S, Hickey C, Harrington B, Gill R. 2001. United States shorebird conservation plan. Manomet (MA): Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences. Google Scholar

15.

Buckley PA, Buckley FG. 1984. Seabirds of the North and Middle Atlantic coasts of the United States: Their status and conservation. In: Croxall J, Evans P, Schreiber R, editors. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. Cambridge (UK): International Council of Bird Preservation Technical Report no. 2; p. 101–133. Google Scholar

16.

Buckley PA, Buckley FG. 2002. Royal Tern (Thalasseus maximus). In: Poole AF, Gill FB, editors. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.700 Google Scholar

17.

Burger J. 2015. Laughing Gull (Leucophaeus atricilla). In: Rodewald PG, editor. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.225 Google Scholar

18.

Burney C. 2009. Florida beach-nesting bird report. Summary of FWC's beach-nesting bird database from 2005–2008. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission. Google Scholar

19.

Butcher GS, Niven DK, Panjabi AO, Pashley DN, Rosenberg KV. 2007. The 2007 WatchList for United States birds. American Birds 61:18–25. Google Scholar

20.

Chabreck RH. 1972. Vegetation, water, and soil characteristics of the Louisiana coastal region. Louisiana State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 66:1–72. Google Scholar

21.

Clapp R, Buckley PA. 1984. Status and conservation of seabirds in the southeastern United States. In: Croxall J, Evans P, Schreiber R, editors. Status and conservation of the world's seabirds. Cambridge (UK): International Council of Bird Preservation Technical Report no. 2; p. 135–155. Google Scholar

22.

Clapp RB, Morgan-Jacobs D, Banks RC. 1983. Marine birds of the southeastern United States. Washington (DC): U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS 83/30. Google Scholar

23.

Clark R, Hardin M, Carruth R, Stapleton T, Smith J, et al. 2013. 2013 comprehensive shorebird nesting summary and year one progress report. Ocean Springs (MS): Gulf Islands National Seashore. DWH/MC252 Avian Conservation Habitat Project Tiered to the BP Early Framework Restoration Agreement. Google Scholar

24.

Clifford B. 2015. Least Tern, Sternula antillarum. In: New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan. Concord (NH): New Hampshire Fish and Game Department; p. 340–344. Google Scholar

25.

[CPRA] Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority. 2012. Louisiana's comprehensive master plan for a sustainable coast. Baton Rouge (LA): Office of the Governor, State of Louisiana. Google Scholar

26.

Cohen EB, Barrow WC Jr , Buler JJ, Deppe JL, Farnsworth A, et al. 2017. Understanding how en route events around the Gulf of Mexico impact intercontinental migratory landbird populations. Condor: Ornithological Applications 119:327–343. Google Scholar

27.

Coleman JM, Huh O. 2004. Major deltas of the world: A perspective from space. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana State University, Coastal Studies Institute. Google Scholar

28.

[CT DEEP] Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. 2015. Connecticut wildlife action plan. Hartford (CT). Google Scholar

29.

Couvillion BR, Beck H, Schoolmaster D, Fischer M. 2017. Land area change in coastal Louisiana from 1932 to 2016. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3381. Google Scholar

30.

Covington E. 2015. Update on USACE projects in the Savannah District. Georgia state wildlife action plan. Social Circle (GA): Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Google Scholar

31.

Curtiss D, Pierce AR. 2016. Evaluation of wintering waterbird habitats on Louisiana barrier islands. Journal of Coastal Research 32:567–574. Google Scholar

32.

Dickinson EC, Christidis L, editors. 2014. The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. Vol. 1. Passerines. Eastbourne (UK): Aves Press. Google Scholar

33.

Dickinson EC, Remsen JV Jr , editors. 2013. The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. Vol. 2. Non-passerines. Eastbourne (UK): Aves Press. Google Scholar

34.

Dinsmore SJ. 2005. Baseline inventory of avian communities on the Mississippi Coast. Jackson (MS): Mississippi Museum of Natural Science. Museum Technical Report No. 113. Google Scholar

35.

Dittmann DL, Cardiff SW. 2005. The “Chandeleur Gull.” Birding May/June:266–276. Google Scholar

36.

Dobbs RC, Barrow WC, Jeske CW, DiMiceli J, Michot TC, Beck JW. 2009. Short-term effects of hurricane disturbance on food availability for migrant songbirds during autumn stopover. Wetlands 29:123–134. Google Scholar

37.

Dodd MG, Murphy TM. 1997. The status and distribution of wading birds in South Carolina, 1988–1996. Chat 61:129–181. Google Scholar

38.

Downer RHL, Liebelt CE. 1990. 1990 Long Island colonial waterbird and Piping Plover survey. Stony Brook (NY): New York Department of Environmental Conservation. Google Scholar

39.

DWH NRDA Trustees.2016. Deepwater Horizon oil spill: Final programmatic damage assessment and restoration plan and final programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damage Assessment Trustees.  http://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/restoration-planning/gulf-plan Google Scholar

40.

Eddleman WR, Knopf FL, Meanley B, Reid FA, Zembal R. 1988. Conservation of North American rallids. Wilson Bulletin 100:458–475. Google Scholar

41.

Emslie SD, Weske JS, Browne MM, Cameron S, Boettcher R, et al. 2009. Population trends in Royal and Sandwich terns along the mid-Atlantic seaboard, USA, 1975–2005. Waterbirds 32:54–63. Google Scholar

42.

Erskine AJ. 1992. Atlas of breeding birds of the Maritime Provinces. Halifax (NS): Nimbus Publications and Nova Scotia Museum. Google Scholar

43.

Erwin RM, Galli J, Burger J. 1981. Colony site dynamics and habitat use in Atlantic coast seabirds. Auk 98:550–561. Google Scholar

44.

Erwin RM, Sanders GM, Prosser DJ, Cahoon DR. 2006a. High tides and rising seas: Potential effects on estuarine waterbirds. Studies in Avian Biology 32:214–228. Google Scholar

45.

Erwin RM, Cahoon DR, Prosser DJ, Sanders GM, Hensel P. 2006b. Surface elevation dynamics in vegetated Spartina marshes versus unvegetated tidal ponds along the mid-Atlantic coast, USA, with implications for waterbirds. Estuaries and Coasts 29:96–106. Google Scholar

46.

Esslinger CG, Wilson BC. 2001. Gulf Coast Joint Venture: Chenier Plain Initiative. Albuquerque (NM): North American Waterfowl Management Plan. Google Scholar

47.

Ferrato JR. 2013. Population density and habitat associations of the Seaside Sparrow on Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, Cameron County, Texas [dissertation]. San Marcos (TX): Texas State University. Google Scholar

48.

[FWC] Fish and Wildlife Commission.2011a. Brown Pelican biological status review report. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission. Google Scholar

49.

[FWC] Fish and Wildlife Commission.2011b. Least Tern biological status review report. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission. Google Scholar

50.

[FWC] Fish and Wildlife Commission.2011c. Tricolored Heron biological status review report. Tallassee (FL): Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission. Google Scholar

51.

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2016. Florida shorebird database [cited 18 Jul 2016].  https://public.myfwc.com/CrossDOI/Shorebirds/DataSummary.aspx Google Scholar

52.

[FNAI] Florida Natural Areas Inventory. 2001. Field guide to the rare animals of Florida. Tallahassee (FL). Google Scholar

53.

Folkerts MM. 2015. Variation in Green Heron nesting success in coastal Louisiana marshes [master's thesis]. Shreveport (LA): Louisiana State University. Google Scholar

54.

Fontenot WR, Cardiff SW, DeMay RA, Dittmann DL, Hartley S, et al. 2012. A catalog of Louisiana's nesting seabird colonies. Thibodaux (LA): Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program Report Number 34. Google Scholar

55.

Ford RG, Davis JN, Capitolo PJ, Parker MW, Robison RE, Robison KM. 2015. Analysis of 2010–2013 photographic census data from waterbird breeding colonies in the vicinity of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Fairhope (AL): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Report. Google Scholar

56.

Frederick PC. 2013. Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor). In: Poole AF, editor. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.306 Google Scholar

57.

Frederick PC, Ogden JC. 1997. Philopatry and nomadism: Contrasting long-term movement behavior and population dynamics of White Ibises and Wood Storks. Colonial Waterbirds 20:316–323. Google Scholar

58.

Furfey BC. 2014. The reproductive and foraging ecology of Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger) on a barrier island refuge in coastal Louisiana [master's thesis]. Jonesboro (AR): Arkansas State University. Google Scholar

59.

Gabrey SW, Afton AD, Wilson BC. 2001. Effects of structural marsh management and winter burning on plant and bird communities during summer in the Gulf Coast Chenier Plain. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:218–231. Google Scholar

60.

Gauthreaux SA. 1971. A radar and direct visual study of passerine migration in southern Louisiana. Auk 88:343–365. Google Scholar

61.

Gauthreaux SA. 1992. The use of weather radar to monitor long-term patterns of trans-Gulf migration in spring. In: Hagan JM III, Johnston DW, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press; p. 96–100. Google Scholar

62.

Gochfeld M, Burger J. 1994. Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger). In: Poole AF, Gill FB, editors. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.108 Google Scholar

63.

Gore JA. 1991. Distribution and abundance of nesting Least Terns and Black Skimmers in northwestern Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 19:65–72. Google Scholar

64.

Gore JA, Hovis JA, Sprandel GL, Douglass NJ. 2007. Distribution and abundance of breeding seabirds along the coast of Florida, 1998–2000. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Final Performance Report. Google Scholar

65.

Green MC. 2006. Status report and survey recommendations on the Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens). Atlanta (GA): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Google Scholar

66.

Green MC, Luent MC, Michot TC, Jeske CW, Leberg PL. 2006. Statewide wading bird and seabird nesting colony inventory, 2004–2005. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Louisiana Natural Heritage Program Report. Google Scholar

67.

Green MC, Luent MC, Michot TC, Jeske CW, Leberg PL. 2008. Comparison and assessment of aerial and ground estimates of waterbird colonies. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:697–706. Google Scholar

68.

Haney JC, Geiger HJ, Short JW. 2014. Bird mortality from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. I. Exposure probability in the offshore Gulf of Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 513:225–237. Google Scholar

69.

Hester MW, Spalding EA, Franze CD. 2005. Biological resources of the Louisiana coast: Part 1. An overview of coastal plant communities of the Louisiana Gulf shoreline. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 44:134–145. Google Scholar

70.

Hodgson AB, Paul AF. 2010. Twenty-five years after basis: An update on the current status and recent trends of colonial waterbird populations in Tampa Bay. In: Cooper TS, editor. Proceedings, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium. BASIS 5: 20–23 October 2009. St. Petersburg (FL). Google Scholar

71.

Holcomb SR, Bass AA, Reid CS, Seymour MA, Lorenz NF, et al. 2015. Louisiana wildlife action plan. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. Google Scholar

72.

Howell SNG, Webb S. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Google Scholar

73.

Hunter WC, Golder W, Melvin S, Wheeler J. 2006. Southeast United States regional waterbird conservation plan. Patuxent (MD): U.S. Geological Survey. Google Scholar

74.

Ivey GL, Herzinger CP. 2006. Intermountain West waterbird conservation plan, Version 1.2. A plan associated with the Waterbird Conservation for the Americas Initiative. Portland (OR): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region. Google Scholar

75.

Jodice PG, Murphy TM, Sanders FJ, Ferguson LM. 2007. Longterm trends in nest counts of colonial seabirds in South Carolina, USA. Waterbirds 30:40–51. Google Scholar

76.

Johnson EI. 2016. Louisiana's Coastal Stewardship Program 2015 annual report: Beach-nesting bird protection, monitoring, and community outreach. Baton Rouge (LA): National Audubon Society. Google Scholar

77.

Johnson, FA. 2009. Variation in population growth rates of Mottled Ducks in Texas and Louisiana. Reston (VA): Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USGS Administrative Report. Google Scholar

78.

Johnson FA, Montalbano F III , Truitt JD, Eggeman DR. 1991. Distribution, abundance, and habitat use by Mottled Ducks in Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 55:476–482. Google Scholar

79.

Kale HW II . 1965. Ecology and bioenergetics of the Longbilled Marsh Wren Telmatodytes palustris griseus (Brewster) in Georgia salt marshes. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, no. 5. Google Scholar

80.

Kale HW. 1996. Marsh Wrens: Cistothorus palustris. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida 5:602–607. Google Scholar

81.

Keller CE, Spendelow JA, Greer RD. 1984. Atlas of wading bird and seabird nesting colonies in coastal Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama: 1983. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Report OBS-84/13. Google Scholar

82.

King K, Flickinger EL, Hildebrand HH. 1977. The decline of Brown Pelicans on the Louisiana and Texas Gulf Coast. Southwestern Naturalist 21:417–431. Google Scholar

83.

Komar O, Angehr G, Eisermann K, Herrera N, Zolotoff JM. 2006. Waterbird population estimates for Central America. Paper presented at IV North American Ornithological Conference, 3–7 Oct 2006, Veracruz, Mexico. Google Scholar

84.

Kroodsma DE, Verner J. 2014. Marsh Wren (Cistothorus palustris). In: Poole AF, editor. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.308 Google Scholar

85.

Kushlan JA. 2007. Conserving herons: A conservation action plan for the herons of the world. Arles (France): Heron Specialist Group and Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat. Google Scholar

86.

Kushlan JA, Steinkamp MJ, Parsons KC, Capp J, Cruz MA, et al. 2002. Waterbird conservation for the Americas: The North American waterbird conservation plan, Version 1. Washington (DC): Waterbird Conservation for the Americas. Google Scholar

87.

Leberg PL, Deshotels P, Pius S, Carloss M. 1995. Nest sites of seabirds on dredge islands in coastal Louisiana. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 49:356–366. Google Scholar

88.

Leberg PL, Green MC, Adams BA, Purcell KM, Luent MC. 2007. Response of waterbird colonies in southern Louisiana to recent drought and hurricanes. Animal Conservation 10:502–508. Google Scholar

89.

Lehmicke AJJ., Berry BE, Shamblin BM, Lennon DM, Woodrey MS, et al. 2012. Isolation and characterization of tetranucleotide microsatellite loci from the Seaside Sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus). Conservation Genetics Resources 4:881–884. Google Scholar

90.

Levine E. 1998. Bull's birds of New York State. Ithaca (NY): Comstock Publishing Associates. Google Scholar

91.

Liechty JS, Fontenot QC, Pierce AR. 2016. Diet composition of Royal Tern (Thalasseus maximus) and Sandwich Tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis) at Isles Dernieres Barrier Island Refuge, Louisiana, USA. Waterbirds 39:58–68. Google Scholar

92.

Lott CA. 2006. Distribution and abundance of the Interior Population of the Least Tern (Sternula antillarum), 2005; A review of the first complete range-wide survey in the context of historic and ongoing monitoring efforts. Vicksburg (MS): U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. ERDC/EL-TR-06-13. Google Scholar

93.

[LA DNR] Louisiana Department of Natural Resources. 2012. Louisiana coastal zone. Baton Rouge (LA). Google Scholar

94.

Lowery GH Jr. 1974. Louisiana birds. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana State University Press. Google Scholar

95.

Lowther PE, Paul RT. 2002. Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens). In: Poole AF, Gill FB, editors. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.633 Google Scholar

96.

[ME DIFW] Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. 2015. Maine's wildlife action plan. Augusta (ME). Google Scholar

97.

Mallach TJ, Leberg PL. 1999. Use of dredged material substrates by nesting terns and Black Skimmers. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:137–146. Google Scholar

98.

Mangold RE. 1977. Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris). In: Sanderson GC, editor. Management of migratory shore and upland game birds in North America. Washington (DC): International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies; p. 84–92. Google Scholar

99.

Mantlik F, Szantyr M, Hanisek G, Hough J, and Wood C. 1998. Eighth report of the Avian Records Committee of Connecticut. Connecticut Warbler 18:162–179. Google Scholar

100.

Marshall RM, Reinert SE. 1990. Breeding ecology of Seaside Sparrows in a Massachusetts salt marsh. Wilson Bulletin 102:501–513. Google Scholar

101.

Martin RP, Lester G. 1993. Atlas and census of wading bird and seabird nesting colonies in Louisiana, 1990 (No. 3). Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. Google Scholar

102.

McCann JM. 2010. Tricolored Heron. In: Ellison W, editor. 2nd atlas of the breeding birds of Maryland and the District of Columbia. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; p. 84–85. Google Scholar

103.

McConnell SW. 2010. Alabama and Mississippi region. North American Birds 64:439–442. Google Scholar

104.

McCracken KG., Johnson WP, Sheldon FH. 2001. Molecular population genetics, phylogeography, and conservation biology of the Mottled Duck (Anas fulvigula). Conservation Genetics 2:87–102. Google Scholar

105.

McKinley P, Hunt P. 2008. Avian use of the Hampton-Seabrook Estuary: 2006–2007. Report to New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Nongame and Endangered Species Program. Concord (NH): New Hampshire Audubon. Google Scholar

106.

Mehlman DW, Mabey SE, Ewert DN, Duncan C, Abel B, et al. 2005. Conserving stopover sites for forest-dwelling migratory landbirds. Auk 122:1281–1290. Google Scholar

107.

Melvin SM. 2010. Survey of coastal nesting colonies of cormorants, gulls, night-herons, egrets, and ibises in Massachusetts, 2006–08. Westborough (MA): Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Google Scholar

108.

Meskill KJ, Alfieri ML, Sommers LA, Miller RL. 1995. 1994 Long Island colonial waterbird and Piping Plover survey. Stony Brook (NY): New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Research Report. Google Scholar

109.

Michel J, Owens EH, Zengel S, Graham A, Nixon Z, et al. 2013. Extent and degree of shoreline oiling: Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Gulf of Mexico, USA. PLOS ONE 8(6):e65087. Google Scholar

110.

Michot TC, Jeske CW, Mazourek JC, Vermillion W, Kemmerer RS. 2003. Atlas and census of wading bird and seabird nesting colonies in south Louisiana, 2001. Thibodaux (LA): Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program. Google Scholar

111.

Montevecchi W, Fifield D, Burke C, Garthe S, Hedd A, et al. 2012. Tracking long-distance migration to assess marine pollution impact. Biology Letters 8:218–221. Google Scholar

112.

Moore FR, Gauthreaux SA, Kerlinger P, Simons TR. 1993. Stopover habitat: Management implications and guidelines. In: Finch DM, Stangel PW, editors. Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds. Fort Collins (CO): Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report RM-229; p. 58–69. Google Scholar

113.

Moore FR, Smith RJ, Sandberg R. 2005. Stopover ecology of intercontinental migrants. In: Greenberg R, Marra PP, editors. Birds of two worlds: The ecology and evolution of migration. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins Press; p. 251–261. Google Scholar

114.

Morrison RIG, Gill RE Jr , Harrington BA, Skagen S, Page GW, et al. 2001. Estimates of shorebird populations in North America. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada. Occasional Paper no. 104. Google Scholar

115.

Mostello CS. 2012. Inventory of terns, Laughing Gulls, and Black Skimmers nesting in Massachusetts in 2011. Westborough (MA): Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Google Scholar

116.

Mostello CS. 2013. Inventory of terns, Laughing Gulls, and Black Skimmers nesting in Massachusetts in 2012. Westborough (MA): Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Google Scholar

117.

Mostello CS. 2014. Inventory of terns, Laughing Gulls, and Black Skimmers nesting in Massachusetts in 2013. Westborough (MA): Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Google Scholar

118.

NatureServe. 2015. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life. Version 7.1. Arlington (VA): NatureServe [cited 23 Jun 2016].  http://explorer.natureserve.org Google Scholar

119.

Nesbitt SA, Schwikert ST, Ehrbar ER. 2002. The return of a Brown Pelican nesting colony. Florida Field Naturalist 30:86–90. Google Scholar

120.

[NJ DEP] New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2006. State wildlife grant report T-1-3: Endangered, threatened, and rare wildlife conservation projects. Trenton (NJ): Division of Fish and Wildlife. Google Scholar

121.

[NJ DEP] New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2008. State wildlife grants T-1-4 report: Endangered, threatened and rare wildlife conservation projects. Trenton (NJ): Division of Fish and Wildlife. Google Scholar

122.

[NJ DEP] New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2015a. State wildlife grants T-1-7 report: Endangered, threatened and rare wildlife conservation projects. Trenton (NJ): Division of Fish and Wildlife. Google Scholar

123.

[NJ DEP] New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2015b. New Jersey state wildlife action plan. Trenton (NJ): Division of Fish and Wildlife. Google Scholar

124.

[NY DEC] New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 2015. New York State wildlife action plan. Albany (NY). Google Scholar

125.

Nisbet ICT, Veit RR, Auer SA, White TP. 2013. Marine birds of the eastern United States and the Bay of Fundy: Distribution, numbers, trends, threats, and management. Cambridge (MA): Nuttall Ornithological Monographs. Google Scholar

126.

[NAWMPC] North American Waterfowl Management Plan. 2012. North American waterfowl management plan 2012: People conserving waterfowl and wetlands. Washington (DC): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Google Scholar

127.

North American Waterfowl Management Plan Committee. 2004. Implementation framework: Strengthening the biological foundation. Canadian Wildlife Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Google Scholar

128.

Ogden JC. 1994. A comparison of wading bird nesting dynamics, 1931–1946 and 1974–1989, as an indication of changes in ecosystem conditions in the southern Everglades. In: Davis S, Ogden JC, editors. Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration. Del Ray Beach (FL): St. Lucie Press; p. 530–570. Google Scholar

129.

Ortego B, Ealy M, Creacy G, LeBeau L. 2011. Colonial waterbird survey. Bulletin of the Texas Ornithological Society 44:51–67. Google Scholar

130.

Oswald JA, Harvey MG, Remsen RC, Foxworth DU, Cardiff SW, et al. 2016. Willet be one species or two? A genomic view of the evolutionary history of Tringa semipalmata. Auk: Ornithological Advances 133:593–614. Google Scholar

131.

Ottenburghs J, Van Hooft P, Van Wieren SE, Ydenberg RC, Prins HHT. 2016. Birds in a bush: Toward an avian phylogenetic network. Auk: Ornithological Advances 133:577–582. Google Scholar

132.

Owen TM, Pierce AR. 2013. Hatching success and nest site characteristics of Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger) on the Isles Dernieres Barrier Island Refuge, Louisiana. Waterbirds 36:342–347. Google Scholar

133.

Owen TM, Pierce AR. 2014. Productivity and chick growth rates of Royal Tern (Thalasseus maximus) and Sandwich Tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis) on the Isles Dernieres Barrier Island Refuge, Louisiana. Waterbirds 37:245–253. Google Scholar

134.

Parnell J, Golder WW, Henson TM. 1995. 1993 atlas of colonial waterbirds of the North Carolina estuaries. Wilmington (NC): North Carolina Sea Grant Program Publication UNC-SG-95-02. Google Scholar

135.

Parnell JF, Golder WW, Shields MA, Quay TL, Henson TM. 1997. Changes in nesting populations of colonial waterbirds in coastal North Carolina 1900–1995. Colonial Waterbirds 20:458–469. Google Scholar

136.

Parnell J, Soots R Jr . 1979. Atlas of colonial waterbirds of North Carolina. Wilmington (NC): University of North Carolina. Sea Grant Publication UNC-SG-79-10. Google Scholar

137.

Pendleton EA, Barras JA, Williams SJ, Twichell DC. 2010. Coastal vulnerability assessment of the northern Gulf of Mexico to sea level rise and coastal change. Reston (VA): U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2010-1146. Google Scholar

138.

Pepper MA, Shriver WG. 2010. Effects of open marsh water management on the reproductive success and nesting ecology of Seaside Sparrows in tidal marshes. Waterbirds 33:381–388. Google Scholar

139.

Petersen WR, Meservey WR. 2003. Laughing Gull. Massachusetts breeding bird atlas 1. Lincoln (MA): Massachusetts Audubon.  http://www.massaudubon.org/our-conservat ion-work/wildlife-researchconservation/statewide-bird-monitoring/breeding-birdatlases/bba1/find-a-bird/(id)/63 Google Scholar

140.

[PIFSC] Partners in Flight Science Committee. 2013. Population estimates database, version 2013 [cited 18 Jul 2016]. Partners in Flight.  http://rmbo.org/pifpopestimates Google Scholar

141.

Portnoy JW. 1977. Nesting colonies of seabirds and wading birds – Coastal Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program. FWS/OBS-77/07. Google Scholar

142.

Portnoy JW. 1978. Colonial waterbird population status and management on the north Gulf of Mexico coast. Proceedings of the Colonial Waterbird Group 1:38–43. Google Scholar

143.

Portnoy JW, Erwin RM, Custer TW. 1981. Atlas of gull and tern colonies: North Carolina to Key West Florida. Washington (DC): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-80/05. Google Scholar

144.

Post W, Gauthreaux SA Jr. 1989. Status and distribution of South Carolina birds. Charleston (SC): Charleston Museum Contribution XVIII. Google Scholar

145.

Post PW, Riepe D. 1980. Laughing Gulls colonize Jamaica Bay. Kingbird 30:11–13. Google Scholar

146.

Purrington RD. 1970. Nesting of the Sooty Tern in Louisiana. Auk 87:159–160. Google Scholar

147.

Purrington RD. 1988. The tern colony of Curlew Island, Louisiana. American Birds 42:1238–1240. Google Scholar

148.

Rabalais NN, Turner RE. 2001. Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Description, causes and change. In: Rabalais NN, Turner RE, editors. Coastal hypoxia: Consequences for living resources and ecosystems. Washington (DC): American Geophysical Union; p. 1–36. Google Scholar

149.

Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ Jr . 2002. Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, a.k.a. “The Dead Zone.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:235–263. Google Scholar

150.

Raynor E, Owen T, Pierce AR, Leumas C, Rohwer FC. 2012a. Sooty Terns breeding on the Isle Dernieres barrier island chain, Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana. Journal of Louisiana Ornithology 9:1–6. Google Scholar

151.

Raynor EJ, Pierce AR, Leumas CM, Rohwer FC. 2012b. Breeding habitat requirements and colony formation by Royal Terns (Thalasseus maximus) and Sandwich Terns (T. sandvicensis) on Barrier Islands in the Gulf of Mexico. Auk 129:763–772. Google Scholar

152.

Raynor EJ, Pierce AR, Owen TM, Leumas CM, Rohwer FC. 2013. Short-term demographic responses of a coastal waterbird community after two major hurricanes. Waterbirds 36:88–93. Google Scholar

153.

Rich TD, Beardmore CJ, Berlanga H, Blancher PJ, Bradstreet MSW, et al. 2004. Partners in Flight North American landbird conservation plan. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Google Scholar

154.

Rodgers JA Jr , Kubilis PS, Nesbitt SA. 2005. Accuracy of aerial surveys of waterbird colonies. Waterbirds 28:230–237. Google Scholar

155.

Runde DE. 1991. Trends in wading bird nesting populations in Florida, 1976–1978 and 1986–1989. Final performance report, Nongame Wildlife Program. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Google Scholar

156.

Sangster G, Collinson JM, Crochet P-A, Knox AG, Parkin DT, et al. 2011. Taxonomic recommendations for British birds: Seventh report. Ibis 153:883–892. Google Scholar

157.

Sasser CE, Visser JM, Mouton E, Linscombe J, Hartley SB. 2013. Vegetation types in coastal Louisiana in 2013. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3290. Google Scholar

158.

Savereno LA. 1992. Accuracy and precision of techniques used to census Least Tern nests [master's thesis]. Clemson (SC): Clemson University. Google Scholar

159.

Scharf WC, Austen M, Blokpoel H. 1993. Distribution and abundance of nesting Forester's [sic] Terns in the Great Lakes of North America. Colonial Waterbird Society Bulletin 12:49–50. Google Scholar

160.

Schweitzer S. 2011. Waterbird investigations and management. Final performance report to the North Carolina Natural Resource Commission, Grant Number T-12. In: Annual program report 2010–2011. Raleigh (NC): Wildlife Diversity Program, Division of Wildlife Management, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission; p. 61–84. Google Scholar

161.

Selman W, Davis BE. 2015. First nesting records in southwestern Louisiana for American Oystercatchers (Haematopus palliatus) and Reddish Egrets (Egretta rufescens), with implications for dredge spoil island restoration. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 127:326–332. Google Scholar

162.

Selman W, Hess TJ Jr , Linscombe J. 2016. Long-term population and colony dynamics of Brown Pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) in rapidly changing coastal Louisiana, USA. Waterbirds 39:45–57. Google Scholar

163.

Shealer D. 1999. Sandwich Tern (Thalasseus sandwichensis). In: Poole AF, editor. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/405 Google Scholar

164.

Shields M. 2014. Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis). In: Poole AF, editor. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.609 Google Scholar

165.

Snipes KC, Sanders FJ. 2012. Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger) breeding trends in South Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 11:437–446. Google Scholar

166.

Sommers L, Miller R, Meskill K, Alfieri M. 1994. 1992–1993 Long Island colonial waterbird and Piping Plover survey. Stony Brook (NY): New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Google Scholar

167.

Soulé M. 1986. Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

168.

Spendelow JA, Patton SR. 1988. National atlas of coastal waterbird colonies in the contiguous United States: 1976–1982. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(5). Google Scholar

169.

Stedman S, Dahl TE. 2008. Status and trends of wetlands in the coastal watersheds of the eastern United States 1998 to 2004. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. Google Scholar

170.

Stevenson HM, Anderson BH. 1994. The birdlife of Florida. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida. Google Scholar

171.

Thompson BC, Jackson JA, Burger J, Hill LA, Kirsch EM, Atwood JL. 1997. Least Tern (Sternula antillarum). In: Poole AF, Gill FB, editors. Birds of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bna.290 Google Scholar

172.

[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Birds of conservation concern 2008. Arlington (VA): U.S. Department of Interior, Division of Migratory Bird Management. Google Scholar

173.

[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. Removal of the Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) from the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife: Final Rule. Federal Register 74(220):59444–59472 (17 Nov 2009). Google Scholar

174.

[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Seabirds of the Maine coast. Maine Coastal Islands National Wildlife Refuge. Google Scholar

175.

[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013. Habitat management plan for Delta and Breton National Wildlife Refuges: Plaquemines and St. Bernard parishes, Louisiana. Google Scholar

176.

[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. 2015 Western Gulf Coast Mottled Duck survey. Laurel (MD): Division of Migratory Bird Management. Google Scholar

177.

[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. National Wetlands Inventory website. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of the Interior [cited 15 Jul 2016].  http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/ Google Scholar

178.

[USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2013. Gap Analysis Program species distribution models. Boise (ID): USGS Gap Analysis Program [cited 15 Jul 2016].  http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/ Google Scholar

179.

Visser JM, Peterson GW. 1994. Breeding populations and colony site dynamics of seabirds nesting in Louisiana. Colonial Waterbirds 17:146–152. Google Scholar

180.

Visser JM, Vermillion WG, Evers DE, Linscombe RG, Sasser CE. 2005. Nesting habitat requirements of the Brown Pelican and their management implications. Journal of Coastal Research 21:27–35. Google Scholar

181.

Votier SC, Hatchwell BJ, Beckerman A, McCleery RH, Hunter FM, et al. 2005. Oil pollution and climate have wide-scale impacts on seabird demographics. Ecology Letters 8:1157–1164. Google Scholar

182.

Walter ST, Carloss MR, Hess TJ, Leberg PL. 2013. Hurricane, habitat degradation, and land loss effects on Brown Pelican nesting colonies. Journal of Coastal Research 29:187–195. Google Scholar

183.

Washburn BE, Haslun BN, Lowney MS, Tennis SE. 2009. Shooting gulls to reduce strikes with aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport, 1991–2008. Special report for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Sandusky (OH): USDA, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center. Google Scholar

184.

Watson A, Reece J, Tirpak BE, Edwards CK, Geselbracht L, et al. 2015. The Gulf Coast vulnerability assessment: Mangrove, tidal emergent marsh, barrier islands, and oyster reef.  http://gulfcoastprairielcc.org/science/science/projects/gulf-coast-vulnerability-assessment/ Google Scholar

185.

Watts BD, Paxton BJ. 2014. Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2013 breeding season. Williamsburg (VA): College of William and Mary/Virginia Commonwealth University, Center for Conservation Biology. CCBTR-14-03. Google Scholar

186.

Wege DC, Anadon-Irizarry V. 2008. Important Bird Areas in the Caribbean: Key sites for conservation. Cambridge (UK): BirdLife International. Google Scholar

187.

Wetlands International. 2012. Waterbird population estimates [cited 25 Jul 2016].  wpe.wetlands.org Google Scholar

188.

Wiedenfeld DA, Swan MM. 2000. Louisiana breeding bird atlas. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana State University, Louisiana Sea Grant College Program. Google Scholar

189.

Wiest WA, Correll MD, Olsen BJ, Elphick CS, Hodgman TP, et al. 2016. Population estimates for tidal marsh birds of high conservation concern in the northeastern USA from a design-based survey. Condor: Ornithological Applications 118:274–288. Google Scholar

190.

Williams LE Jr , Martin L. 1968. Nesting status of Brown Pelican in Florida in 1968. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 31:130–140. Google Scholar

191.

Wilson TE, Wheeler J, Green MC, Palacios E, editors. 2014. Reddish Egret conservation action plan. Reddish Egret Conservation Planning Workshop, October 2012. Corpus Christi (TX). Google Scholar

192.

Withers K. 2002. Shorebird use of coastal wetland and barrier island habitat in the Gulf of Mexico. Scientific World Journal 2:514–536. Google Scholar

193.

Zambrano R, Warraich TN. 2010. Statewide nesting seabird and shorebird survey in Florida: Ground and roof. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Google Scholar

194.

Zardusky J. 1981. Forster's Tern breeding on Long Island. Kingbird 31:212–213. Google Scholar

195.

Zdravkovic M. 2007. Beach-nesting bird breeding census and report for coastal Alabama. 2007. New York (NY): National Audubon Society, Coastal Bird Conservation Program. Google Scholar

196.

Zdravkovic MG. 2013. Conservation plan for the Wilson's Plover (Charadrius wilsonia). Version 1.0. Manomet (MA): Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences. Google Scholar

197.

Zdravkovic M, DeMay R. 2006. Status of select beachnesting birds in coastal Louisiana 2005: Breeding abundance, habitat use, and distribution. Thibodaux (LA): Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program Report No. 33. Google Scholar

198.

Zdravkovic MG, Hecker S. 2006. 2005 beach nesting bird census and report for coastal Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. New York (NY): National Audubon Society, Coastal Bird Conservation Program. Google Scholar
J. V. Remsen, Bryan P. Wallace, Michael A. Seymour, Daniel A. O'Malley, and Erik I. Johnson "The regional, national, and international importance of Louisiana's coastal avifauna," The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 131(2), 221-434, (20 June 2019). https://doi.org/10.1676/18-111
Received: 21 May 2018; Accepted: 6 November 2018; Published: 20 June 2019
KEYWORDS
barrier islands
coastal bird conservation
Louisiana coastal birds
Mississippi River Delta
population estimates
Back to Top