Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2003 Predator Exclusion Methods for Managing Endangered Shorebirds: Are Two Barriers Better than One?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Reproductive success of shorebirds can be improved by placement of predator exclosure fences along beaches or wire-mesh exclosure “cages” over nests. We predicted that these two types of exclosures used simultaneously might further improve reproductive success over that when cages alone are used. Field experiments were carried out on Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) on prairie alkali lakes in North Dakota and Montana. During 1996 and 1997, we compared success of nesting plover pairs provided with: (1) no protection, (2) cages that protected eggs in individual nests from both mammalian and avian predators, and (3) a combination of cages plus a temporary electric fence that excluded mammalian predators from the entire nesting beach where chicks were being reared. In 20 replicated trials, fledgling production rates were: no protection, 0.72 chicks/pair (95% CI: 0.29-1.15, N = 43 pairs); cage only, 1.73 (1.30-2.16, N = 46); fence plus cage, 2.06 (1.63-2.49, N = 50). Production by protected pairs was significantly greater than for unprotected pairs. However, no significant difference in production was detected between the two protection types. Temporary electric fences were relatively expensive to apply and added little to the effectiveness of cages, but may be appropriate in situations where cages cannot be used or where mammalian predation on chicks is a greater threat.

Robert K. Murphy1, Raymond J. Greenwood2, Jacob S. Ivan3, and Karen A. Smith4 "Predator Exclusion Methods for Managing Endangered Shorebirds: Are Two Barriers Better than One?," Waterbirds 26(2), 156-159, (1 June 2003). https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0156:PEMFME]2.0.CO;2
Received: 13 May 2002; Accepted: 1 January 2003; Published: 1 June 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top