Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2002 Sampling strategy is important for producing weed maps: a case study using kriging
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Weed maps are typically produced from data sampled at discrete intervals on a regular grid. Errors are expected to occur as data are sampled at increasingly coarse scales. To demonstrate the potential effect of sampling strategy on the quality of weed maps, we analyzed a data set comprising the counts of capeweed in 225,000 quadrats completely covering a 0.9-ha area. The data were subsampled at different grid spacings, quadrat sizes, and starting points and were then used to produce maps by kriging. Spacings of 10 m were found to overestimate the geostatistical range by 100% and missed details apparently resulting from the spraying equipment. Some evidence was found supporting the rule of thumb that surveys should be conducted at a spacing of about half the scale of interest. Quadrat size had less effect than spacing on the map quality. At wider spacings the starting position of the sample grid had a considerable effect on the qualities of the maps but not on the estimated geostatistical range. Continued use of arbitrary survey designs is likely to miss the information of interest to biologists and may possibly produce maps inappropriate to spray application technology.

Nomenclature: Capeweed, Arctotheca calendula (L.) Levyns.

Roger D. Cousens, Roderick W. Brown, Alex B. McBratney, Brett Whelan, and Michael Moerkerk "Sampling strategy is important for producing weed maps: a case study using kriging," Weed Science 50(4), 542-546, (1 July 2002). https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0542:SSIIFP]2.0.CO;2
Received: 29 March 2001; Accepted: 22 November 2001; Published: 1 July 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top