How to translate text using browser tools
1 November 2005 Use of isothiocyanates for suppression of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri ), pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)
Jason K. Norsworthy, John T. Meehan
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the herbicidal activity of five aliphatic (ethyl, propyl, butyl, allyl, and 3-methylthiopropyl) and three aromatic (phenyl, benzyl, and 2-phenylethyl) isothiocyanates (ITCs) on Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, and yellow nutsedge. All ITCs were applied to soil at 0, 10, 100, 1,000, and 10,000 nmol g−1 of soil and incorporated. All ITCs had a deleterious effect on Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory emergence. LC50 values for Palmer amaranth emergence inhibition from aliphatic and aromatic ITCs ranged from a low of 32 nmol g−1 of soil for phenyl ITC to a high of 941 nmol g−1 of soil for propyl ITC. Pitted morningglory was slightly more tolerant than Palmer amaranth to each of the ITCs, with LC50 values for emergence ranging from 347 to 2,855 nmol g−1 of soil for 3-methylthiopropyl and butyl ITC, respectively. Yellow nutsedge was the most tolerant of the three species, with LC50 values for ethyl, butyl, benzyl, and 2-phenylethyl being greater than the highest evaluated concentration of 10,000 nmol g−1 of soil. Phenyl and 3-methylthiopropyl at 10,000 nmol g−1 of soil were the most effective ITCs against yellow nutsedge, reducing emergence by 92%. Effectiveness of the ITCs varied across structure and species, but 3-methylthiopropyl and phenyl ITC were generally the most efficacious for the three species evaluated.

Nomenclature: Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPES.

Jason K. Norsworthy and John T. Meehan "Use of isothiocyanates for suppression of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri ), pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)," Weed Science 53(6), 884-890, (1 November 2005). https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-056R.1
Received: 10 May 2005; Accepted: 1 July 2005; Published: 1 November 2005
KEYWORDS
Alternative weed management
glucosinolates
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top