How to translate text using browser tools
1 May 2007 Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Seed Bank Dynamics in Transition to Organic Wheat Production Systems
Bruce D. Maxwell, Richard G. Smith, Monica Brelsford
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Concern over the consequences of increased weed seed inputs to the soil seed bank during the transition period from conventional to organic production is one obstacle to grower adoption of reduced input and nonchemical weed management strategies. An 11-yr study was established in southwest Montana to investigate the effect of a single pulse of wild oat seeds on subsequent seed bank dynamics. In 1993, wild oat seeds were sown at five densities (0, 20, 80, 320, and 800 seeds m−2) in eight wheat–small grain cropping systems that differed in the number of crops in rotation and fallow periods. Wild oat seed banks were measured each spring from 1994 to 2004 in half of the cropping systems and from 2001 to 2004 in all eight systems. In 1994, seed bank densities in response to the pulse were as much as 11 times higher than controls that received no seeds in 1993. By 1996, after mechanical fallowing of all cropping systems, wild oat seed bank densities were not significantly different from densities in control plots regardless of the size of the initial seed pulse and remained so through 2004. These data suggest that increases in wild oat seed inputs during the organic transition period will have relatively few long-term agronomic effects on the dynamics of wild oat seed banks in these systems. In addition, wild oat seed banks may be constrained by factors other than cropping sequence when herbicides are not used, such as possible density-dependent regulation as a result of increased soil pathogen attack and seed predation.

Nomenclature: Wild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFA, wheat, Triticum aestivum L

Bruce D. Maxwell, Richard G. Smith, and Monica Brelsford "Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Seed Bank Dynamics in Transition to Organic Wheat Production Systems," Weed Science 55(3), 212-217, (1 May 2007). https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-06-179.1
Received: 16 October 2006; Accepted: 1 January 2007; Published: 1 May 2007
KEYWORDS
crop rotation
density dependence
Feedbacks
mechanical fallow
reduced input
weeds
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top