How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2008 Chemical and Physical Defense of Weed Seeds in Relation to Soil Seedbank Persistence
Adam S. Davis, Brian J. Schutte, James Iannuzzi, Karen A. Renner
Author Affiliations +

Effective weed seedbank management requires mechanistic understanding of ecological determinants of seed persistence in the soil seedbank. Chemical and physical defense of common lambsquarters, field pennycress, giant foxtail, kochia, velvetleaf, and yellow foxtail seeds were quantified in relation to short- and long-term seedbank persistence. Seed content of ortho-dihydroxyphenols (o-DHP), a class of putative seed defense compounds, varied more than threefold between the least protected species (common lambsquarters, 9.2 µg g seed−1) and the most protected species (kochia, 34.1 µg g seed−1). Seed o-DHP was inversely related (r  =  −0.77, P < 0.001) to seed half-life in the soil and to short-term seed persistence in burial assays (r  =  −0.82, P < 0.05). The relative importance of chemical seed protection in comparison to physical seed protection, as represented by the ratio of seed o-DHP concentration to seed coat thickness, decreased linearly with increasing short-term seed persistence (r  =  −0.96, P < 0.01) and nonlinearly with increasing long-term seed persistence in the soil seedbank (y  =  0.16 0.21/(0.0432 x), R2  =  0.99, P < 0.001). Mechanical damage to the seed coat, via piercing, slicing, or grinding treatments, increased short-term mortality during burial for all six species. Mortality of pierced seeds was negatively associated (r  =  −0.35, P < 0.05) with seed phenol concentration and positively associated with seed half-life (r  =  0.42, P < 0.01) and seed coat thickness (r  =  0.36, P < 0.05). Seed phenolics, as a class, supported the results for o-DHPs. Overall, these findings suggest a potential weakness, with respect to seedbank management, in the way weed seed defenses are constructed. Weed species with transient seedbanks appear to invest more in chemical defense than those species with highly persistent seedbanks. As a result, seeds in the latter category are relatively more dependent upon physical seed protection for persistence in the soil seedbank, and more vulnerable to management tactics that reduce the physical integrity of the weed seed coat.

Nomenclature: Common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.; field pennycress, Thlaspi arvense L.; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm.; kochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik.; yellow foxtail, Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv.

Adam S. Davis, Brian J. Schutte, James Iannuzzi, and Karen A. Renner "Chemical and Physical Defense of Weed Seeds in Relation to Soil Seedbank Persistence," Weed Science 56(5), 676-684, (1 September 2008).
Received: 3 December 2007; Accepted: 1 April 2008; Published: 1 September 2008
mechanical damage
phenolic compounds
physical protection
seed coat
Get copyright permission
Back to Top