Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2011 Weeds and the Red to Far-Red Ratio of Reflected Light: Characterizing the Influence of Herbicide Selection, Dose, and Weed Species
Scott T Cressman, Eric R Page, Clarence J Swanton
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Crop seedlings detect the presence of neighboring competitors by means of the red to far-red ratio (R/FR) of light reflected from the leaf surfaces of adjacent seedlings. Although previous studies have suggested that shifts in the R/FR initiate crop–weed competition, no studies have documented the R/FR of light reflected from weeds or explored how weed management practices may affect the R/FR. Experiments were conducted to test the following hypotheses: (1) the duration of R/FR signals reflected from the leaf surface of weed seedlings will vary among herbicides following treatment and will decline faster as the dose of a given herbicide increases, (2) the R/FR of reflected light will differ among weed species, and (3) the R/FR of reflected light will decrease as weed seedling leaf area and stage of development increases. Velvetleaf was used as a model weed species to examine herbicide chemistry and dose, and six weed species including Powell amaranth, velvetleaf, Eastern black nightshade, barnyardgrass, proso millet, and green foxtail were evaluated in order to characterize the R/FR of light reflected from their leaf surfaces. Results of this study confirm that the R/FR reflected from the leaf surface of weeds is affected by: herbicide chemistry, herbicide dose, weed species, stage of weed development, and distance of the weed from the crop. The relative decline in the R/FR (as a percent of the untreated control) was most rapid following treatment with paraquat, followed by glufosinate and then glyphosate. As glyphosate dose decreased, so did the reduction in the relative R/FR. Based on reflected R/FR, weed species tended to be grouped into monocots and dicots, with the latter reflecting a lower R/FR per unit leaf area than the former. This disparity was attributed to the compact leaf arrangement and orientation of dicot weed canopies, which may contribute to the greater competitiveness of dicot weeds.

Nomenclature: Glyphosate; glufosinate; paraquat; barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv. ECHCG; Eastern black nightshade, Solanum ptycanthum Dunal. SOLPT; green foxtail, Setaria viridis L. (Beauv.) SETVI; proso millet, Panicum milliaceum L. PANMI; Powell amaranth, Amaranthus powellii S. Wats. AMPO; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ABUTH.

Weed Science Society of America
Scott T Cressman, Eric R Page, and Clarence J Swanton "Weeds and the Red to Far-Red Ratio of Reflected Light: Characterizing the Influence of Herbicide Selection, Dose, and Weed Species," Weed Science 59(3), 424-430, (1 July 2011). https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-10-00166.1
Received: 11 November 2010; Accepted: 1 March 2011; Published: 1 July 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
competition theory
competitive mechanism
dicotyledonous
monocotyledonous
Red to far-red ratio
weed competitive index
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top