Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2007 Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Response to Glyphosate Applied in Irrigated and Nonirrigated Conditions
Author Affiliations +

Field experiments were conducted in Alabama during 1999 and 2000 to test the hypothesis that any glyphosate-induced yield suppression in glyphosate-resistant cotton would be less with irrigation than without irrigation. Yield compensation was monitored by observing alterations in plant growth and fruiting patterns. Glyphosate treatments included a nontreated control, 1.12 kg ai/ha applied POST at the 4-leaf stage, 1.12 kg/ha applied DIR at the prebloom stage, and 1.12 kg/ha applied POST at 4-leaf and postemergence directed (DIR) at the prebloom cotton stages. The second variable, irrigation treatment, was established by irrigating plots individually with overhead sprinklers or maintaining them under dryland, nonirrigated conditions. Cotton yield and all measured parameters including lint quality were positively affected by irrigation. Irrigation increased yield 52% compared to nonirrigated cotton. Yield and fiber quality effects were independent of glyphosate treatments. Neither yield nor any of the measured variables that reflected whole plant response were influenced by glyphosate treatment or by a glyphosate by irrigation interaction.

Nomenclature: Glyphosate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; ‘Delta and Pine Land 458 BGRR’.

C. DALE MONKS, Glenn Wehtje, Charles Burmester, Andrew J. Price, MICHAEL G. PATTERSON, DENNIS P. DELANEY, Wilson Faircloth, and Marshall R. Woods "Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Response to Glyphosate Applied in Irrigated and Nonirrigated Conditions," Weed Technology 21(4), 915-921, (1 October 2007).
Received: 7 July 2006; Accepted: 1 June 2007; Published: 1 October 2007

Get copyright permission
Back to Top