BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2009 Peanut and Eclipta (Eclipta prostrata) Response to Flumioxazin
David L. Jordan, Sarah H. Lancaster, James E. Lanier, Bridget R. Lassiter, P. Dewayne Johnson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Research was conducted in North Carolina to determine peanut response to flumioxazin as influenced by rate and timing of application and cultivar. Delaying application of flumioxazin from 1 d after planting until peanut emergence increased injury regardless of rate. The Virginia market-type cultivar ‘NC-V 11’ was injured more by flumioxazin than the cultivars ‘Gregory’ or ‘Perry’. However, pod yield was not affected by flumioxazin even though significant injury was observed early in the season regardless of flumioxazin rate, application timing, or cultivar. Diclosulam was more effective than flumioxazin in controlling eclipta when these herbicides were applied PRE with metolachlor or following pendimethalin PPI. However, control by flumioxazin prevented yield loss when compared with metolachlor alone.

Nomenclature: Diclosulam; flumioxazin; eclipta, Eclipta prostrata L.; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., ‘Gregory’, ‘NC-V 11’, ‘Perry’.

David L. Jordan, Sarah H. Lancaster, James E. Lanier, Bridget R. Lassiter, and P. Dewayne Johnson "Peanut and Eclipta (Eclipta prostrata) Response to Flumioxazin," Weed Technology 23(2), 231-235, (1 April 2009). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-050.1
Received: 30 March 2008; Accepted: 1 February 2009; Published: 1 April 2009
KEYWORDS
Crop injury
herbicide
peanut tolerance
weed management
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top