Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2009 Venice Mallow (Hibiscus trionum) Interference in Sugarbeet
Dennis C. Odero, Abdel O. Mesbah, Stephen D. Miller, Andrew R. Kniss
Author Affiliations +

Field studies were conducted in Powell, WY, in 2006 and 2007 to determine the influence of season-long interference of various Venice mallow densities and duration of interference on sugarbeet. Sucrose concentration was not affected by Venice mallow interference. The effect of Venice mallow density on sugarbeet root and sucrose yield loss was described by the rectangular hyperbola model. Root and sucrose yield loss increased as Venice mallow density increased. The estimated asymptote, A (percent yield loss as density approaches infinity) was 61% for both root and sucrose yield loss, and the estimated parameter, I (percent yield loss per unit weed density as density approaches zero) was 6% for both root and sucrose yield loss. Sugarbeet root yield decreased as the duration of Venice mallow interference increased. The critical timing of weed removal to avoid 5 and 10% root yield loss was 30 and 43 d after sugarbeet emergence, respectively. Results show that Venice mallow is competitive with sugarbeet implying that it should be managed appropriately to reduce negative effects on yield and prevent seed bank replenishment and re-infestation in subsequent years.

Nomenclature: Venice mallow, Hibiscus trionum L. HIBTR; sugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L.

Dennis C. Odero, Abdel O. Mesbah, Stephen D. Miller, and Andrew R. Kniss "Venice Mallow (Hibiscus trionum) Interference in Sugarbeet," Weed Technology 23(4), 581-585, (1 October 2009).
Received: 28 April 2009; Accepted: 1 July 2009; Published: 1 October 2009

critical period
length of competition
percent sucrose
timing of removal
weed density
Get copyright permission
Back to Top