Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2011 Weed Control, Environmental Impact, and Economics of Weed Management Strategies in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

With the number of glyphosate-resistant weed species increasing in North America and a lack of new herbicide chemistries being developed, growers are shifting toward using older herbicides that are more expensive and may be less environmentally friendly. Therefore, to determine which weed management strategies are most cost effective and have the lowest impact on the environment we evaluated the efficacy, environmental impact, and the profitability of several weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant soybean over a 3-yr period (2007 to 2009) at three locations in southwestern Ontario, Canada. No visible injury to soybean was observed with the herbicide treatments evaluated. A sequential application of glyphosate consistently provided high levels of weed control (99 to 100%) at 56 d after treatment in comparison with one- or two-pass herbicide programs. Soybean yield did not differ between the two-pass herbicide programs and glyphosate applied early POST; however, a yield benefit was found with a sequential application of glyphosate or a PRE herbicide followed by glyphosate compared with glyphosate applied only at late POST. The two-pass herbicide programs had higher environmental impact (EI) (> 23) than the one-pass herbicide programs (< 15), except when imazethapyr was followed by or tank-mixed with glyphosate, which had an equivalent EI (∼ 14) to the one-pass herbicide programs. Not surprisingly because of the low purchase price of glyphosate, gross margins were highest for treatments that included glyphosate. However, to reduce the selection pressure on glyphosate-resistant weed biotypes, to reduce environmental impact, and to increase gross margins a combination of glyphosate with another mode of action would be most beneficial. In this study glyphosate imazethapyr was the best alternative to a sequential two-pass glyphosate program.

Nomenclature: Flumetsulam; glyphosate; imazethapyr; s-metolachlor; soybean, Glycine max L.; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBEL; green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. SETVI; redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMARE; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ABUTH.

Weed Science Society of America
Christie L Stewart, Robert E Nurse, Laura L Van Eerd, Richard J Vyn, and Peter H Sikkema "Weed Control, Environmental Impact, and Economics of Weed Management Strategies in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean," Weed Technology 25(4), 535-541, (1 October 2011). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00116.1
Received: 19 August 2010; Accepted: 17 May 2011; Published: 1 October 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top