BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2012 Economic Evaluation of Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Competition in Field Corn
Nyland R. Falkenberg, Todd J. Cogdill, M. Edward Rister, James M. Chandler
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Field studies were conducted near College Station, TX, in 2006 and 2007 to evaluate the economic impact of common sunflower interference in field corn. A density of one common sunflower per 6 m of crop row caused a yield loss of 293 kg ha−1. Estimated losses at a net corn price of $0.08 kg−1 was $92 ha−1 for infestation levels of four common sunflower plants per 6 m of row. Corn yield was increased by 32 kg ha−1 by each 1,000 plant ha−1 increase in corn planting density. Corn planting densities of 49,400 and 59,300 plants ha−1 provided the greatest net returns with or without the presence of common sunflower competition. Corn yields were reduced by extended duration of sunflower competition, with losses exceeding 1,500 kg ha−1 per week and increasing in magnitude at a decreasing rate throughout the growing season. Herbicide treatments provided net returns of $600 to $1,300 ha−1 above no weed control in both 2006 and 2007. Net returns of $609 and $653 ha−1 were obtained without the use of any herbicide for sunflower control. Determining the economic impact of common sunflower interference in field corn allows producers to estimate the overall net return on the basis of duration of common sunflower interference and density, while considering varying net corn prices, crop planting density, and herbicide application costs.

Nomenclature: Common sunflower, Helianthus annuus HELAN; corn, Zea mays L. ‘DLP 69-71’.

Weed Science Society of America
Nyland R. Falkenberg, Todd J. Cogdill, M. Edward Rister, and James M. Chandler "Economic Evaluation of Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Competition in Field Corn," Weed Technology 26(1), 137-144, (1 January 2012). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00158.1
Received: 18 November 2010; Accepted: 1 September 2011; Published: 1 January 2012
KEYWORDS
density
duration
herbicidal control
marginal economic analyses
net corn prices
net returns
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top