Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2012 Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Corn Interference and Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Sugarbeet
Andrew R. Kniss, Gustavo M. Sbatella, Robert G. Wilson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) sugarbeet is commonly grown in rotation with GR corn, but there is limited information relating to volunteer GR corn interference or control in GR sugarbeet. Field studies were conducted near Lingle, WY and Scottsbluff, NE in 2009 and 2010 to quantify sugarbeet yield loss in response to volunteer corn density and duration of interference, and determine appropriate control practices for use in GR sugarbeet. Hybrid corn resulted in a similar competitive effect on sugarbeet sucrose yield as clumps of F2 volunteer corn. Clumps of volunteer corn were controlled 81% compared with 73% for individual plants. Linear regression indicated sucrose yield loss of 19% for each corn plant m−2 up to 1.7 plants m−2 at three of four experimental sites. Pearson correlation coefficients between percentage sucrose yield loss and proportion of sunlight reaching the top of the sugarbeet canopy ranged from −0.42 to −0.92. The duration of corn interference required to cause a 5% sucrose yield loss (YL5) ranged from 3.5 to 5.9 wk after sugarbeet emergence (WAE) for hand-weeding or herbicide removal, respectively, due to the length of time herbicide-treated volunteer corn continued to shade sugarbeet plants. Differences between herbicide and hand-removal methods were attributed to the time lag between when the treatments were applied and when the corn ceased to block light from the sugarbeet canopy. Sethoxydim generally provided less volunteer corn control compared with either quizalofop or clethodim, and control increased with the addition of an oil adjuvant. If a grower were to implement a volunteer corn control practice 3.5 WAE, economic sugarbeet yield loss would be avoided. In eastern Wyoming and western Nebraska, the sugarbeet crop will typically have between four to eight true leaves at 3.5 WAE, and therefore this would be an optimal time to control volunteer corn. If volunteer corn is being hand weeded, the YL5 estimate will also increase, and thus the window of time to control volunteer corn would be wider.

Nomenclature: Clethodim; glyphosate; quizalofop; sethoxydim; volunteer corn, Zea mays L. ZEAMX; sugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L.

Weed Science Society of America
Andrew R. Kniss, Gustavo M. Sbatella, and Robert G. Wilson "Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Corn Interference and Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Sugarbeet," Weed Technology 26(2), 348-355, (1 April 2012). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00125.1
Received: 7 September 2011; Accepted: 1 December 2011; Published: 1 April 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
adjuvant
critical period
crop rotation
Weed competition
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top