Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2013 Cover Crops for Weed Management in Southern Reduced-Tillage Vegetable Cropping Systems
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

With growing agricultural demands from both conventional and organic systems comes the need for sustainable practices to ensure long-term productivity. Implementation of reduced- or no-till practices offers a number of environmental benefits for agricultural land and maintains adequate yield for current and future production. Concerns over satisfactory pest control options, particularly weed control, have contributed to the slow adoption of conservation practices in many areas. To identify effective alternative weed management options for use in conservation systems, research in the Southeast has continued to evaluate the use of cover crops in conjunction with reduced-tillage practices. A number of cover crop species, including cereal grains, legumes, and Brassicaceae species, that have potential to suppress weeds through direct crop interference or allelopathic potential have been investigated. Many recent research projects in the Midsouth and southeastern United States have assessed the success of cover crops in reduced-tillage row crop settings with promising outcomes in some systems. However, continued research is necessary to identify appropriate cover crop and tillage systems for use in other agricultural settings, such as vegetable crops and organic production systems.

Con el incremento en la demanda de productos agrícolas tanto de sistemas convencionales como orgánicos, viene la necesidad de prácticas sostenibles que aseguren la productividad a largo plazo. La implementación de prácticas de labranza reducida o cero ofrece un número de beneficios ambientales para la tierra agrícola y mantiene rendimientos adecuados para la producción actual y futura. La preocupación con respecto al control satisfactorio de plagas, particularmente de malezas, ha contribuido a la lenta adopción de prácticas de conservación en muchas áreas. Con el objetivo de identificar opciones alternativas para el manejo de malezas, las investigaciones en el Sureste han continuado para evaluar el uso de cultivos de cobertura en combinación con prácticas de labranza reducida. Se han investigado varias especies como cultivos de cobertura, incluyendo cereales, leguminosas y especies Brassicaceae, que tienen el potencial de suprimir malezas mediante la interferencia directa del cultivo o por su potencial alelopático. Muchos proyectos de investigación recientes en el Sur medio y en el Sureste de los Estados Unidos han evaluado el éxito de cultivos de cobertura en cultivos extensivos y bajo labranza reducida con resultados promisorios en varios sistemas. Sin embargo, se necesita que la investigación continúe para identificar cultivos de cobertura apropiados y sistemas de labranza para el uso en otros sistemas agrícolas, tales como vegetales y sistemas de producción orgánica.

Current U.S. consumption and use of vegetables is estimated to be slightly less than 200 kg per person annually with over $13 billion a year spent on vegetables by residents in southern states (U.S. Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service 2012). With vegetable demand expected to continue to increase slowly (Thornsbury and Jerardo 2012), vegetable production likely will experience continued growth in the southeastern United States. In order to preserve farm resources and reduce the need for external inputs which increase producer costs (Singh et al. 2005), sustainable vegetable production practices must be implemented.

A number of management practices have been identified as tools to improve production sustainability. Among these are reduced tillage (RT), cover cropping, crop rotation, intercropping, and water management (Singh et al. 2005). RT practices, in particular, can improve soil organic matter and maintain crop yield in the future (Phatak et al. 2002). However, implementation of RT in vegetable productions can be challenging due to the loss of weed control provided by tillage and cultivation.

Reduced Tillage

The adoption of RT or no-tillage (NT) systems can improve multiple environmental aspects of agricultural land, particularly concerning erosion and runoff (Price et al. 2011). NT operations have also been shown to improve soil quality and reduce production expenses; however, in some instances, complete elimination of tillage has not been feasible due to soil compaction (Busscher and Bauer 2003; Schomberg et al. 2006; Triplett and Dick 2008). In these cases RT, such as strip-tillage (zone tillage), offers many of the benefits of NT operations with reduced surface disturbance while still providing a narrow cultivated seed bed for planting and reduced soil compaction from in-row subsoiling (Raper et al. 1998; Torbert and Reeves 1994). Integrating cover crops into these systems as ground cover after crop planting can further reduce soil erosion and water runoff while providing a level of weed control through physical and allelopathic means (Hartwig and Ammon 2002; Reeves 1994). Strip-tillage, in particular, has been identified as an alternative to employ with cover crops to replace conventional tillage in situations in which soil temperatures is reduced due to residue cover or development of a hardpan is a concern (Bottenberg et al. 1999).

In the southern United States, RT systems with high-residue cover crops have been successful for weed control in conventional cotton and soybean research (Norsworthy et al. 2011; Price et al. 2006; Reeves et al. 2005). Results of these studies showed increased weed suppression from high-residue cereal covers in strip tillage systems when compared to fallow systems. These experiments also reported crop yields equal to or greater than fallow systems when utilizing a high biomass-producing cover crop such as rye (Secale cereale L.). Other cover crops evaluated in these studies such as wheat (Triticun aestivum L.) and turnip (Brassica rapa L.) were less successful overall compared to other cover crops due to reduced weed inhibition or reduced yield from cover crop allelopathy.

Although RT row crop production with cover crops has been documented, vegetable producers, both conventional and organic, have largely avoided implementing these practices because of concerns over increased insect and disease pressure as well as a dependence on tillage and cultivation practices for adequate weed control (Phatak et al. 2002). For organic producers, the inability to use herbicides makes tillage practices an even more critical aspect of weed suppression. Research has been conducted with these systems in regions such as California and the Northeast with successful outcomes; however, experimentation remains limited in southeastern organic vegetables (Madden et al. 2004). In the available publications for this region, variable weed control response has been reported; although, these systems have been shown to be economically feasible in some vegetable production systems (Chellemi and Rosskopf 2004; Morse 2000; Mulvaney et al. 2011; Treadwell et al. 2007).

Although RT offers many environmental and economic benefits, one major drawback to utilizing less tillage is the loss of weed control. In many vegetable production systems, particularly organic production, limited or no herbicides are available for use, leaving growers to rely on tillage and subsequent cultivation to achieve sufficient weed control (Fernandez et al. 2012; Mulvaney et al. 2011; Walters and Young 2012). To effectively maintain weed suppression in RT vegetables, multiple weed control strategies can be utilized as alternatives to intensive tillage and herbicides including mulches, cover crops, soil solarization, flaming, and biological control agents (Singh et al. 2005). Specifically, ground covers, such as mulch and cover crop residue, offer a level of weed suppression when utilized in conjunction with RT.

Weed Control with Ground Covers

Conventional as well as organic vegetable production often employs some type of mulch system to help suppress in-row weed emergence. Polyethylene mulch is commonly used in both for a number of benefits, including weed suppression, more rapid crop growth, and plant protection from disease (Bangarwa et al. 2009; Locascio et al. 2005; Warnick et al. 2006b). Although plastic mulch is allowed in organic systems, several disadvantages of polyethylene mulch, such as removal expense, increased runoff, and soil erosion, have encouraged research efforts to identify more sustainable mulch materials for use in vegetable production (Law et al. 2006; Rice et al. 2001). Plastic mulches also generally require tillage to produce a flat surface and to bury the edges of the mulch to keep it in place during the season.

A number of organic mulches have been evaluated in the Southeast as alternatives to plastic mulches, which are more compatible with RT systems. Although the use of organic mulches may reduce soil temperature in comparison with plastic, soil moisture conservation, reduced runoff, improved soil quality, and low removal costs have made organic mulches such as straw, wood chips, and compost potential mulch options in organic production (Feldman et al. 2000). To this end, Law et al. (2006) in Kentucky and Mulvaney et al. (2011) in Alabama have reported effective weed suppression in herbicide-free vegetable production with surface-applied mulches including straw, wood chips, and perennial weed cuttings. Additional alternative mulches, such as hydraulic and foam mulches, have been developed for use in organic systems and have potential for successful weed control (Masiunas et al. 2003). Hydramulch, a type of cellulose fiber–based hydraulic mulch applied as a slurry, has been tested in Florida and shows promise for weed control in organic production of vining plants where nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) is not a problematic weed (Warnick et al. 2006a).

Cover Crops

Weed suppression also can be achieved in vegetable production with a variety of cover crops grown prior to the vegetable crop. Cereal grains, legumes, and mustards are common cover crops shown to be beneficial in vegetable systems for multiple purposes such as nematode suppression, nitrogen source, improved soil quality, and weed control (Peoples et al. 1995; Wang et al. 2008). Common cover crops include fall-planted species such as cereal rye, crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), vetch species (Vicia spp.), and radish (Raphanus spp.); summer covers can include soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], velvetbean (Mucuna pruriens L.), sudangrass and sorghum × sudangrass hybrids [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. drummondii (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet and Harlan], and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) (Creamer and Baldwin 2000; Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education [SARE] 2007).

Traditionally in organic systems, summer or winter cover crops are incorporated into the soil through primary tillage before crop seeding or transplanting (Norsworthy et al. 2007; Treadwell et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2008). Weed emergence is reduced during the growing season of the cover crop as well as through the release of allelopathic compounds, if produced by the species, after soil incorporation (Brennan and Smith 2005; Treadwell et al. 2007). In RT systems, however, cover crop residue remains on the soil surface after cover crop termination in order to suppress weed growth through chemical and physical means.

Allelopathy has been described as the plant production of biochemicals that can impede plant germination and growth in the absence of resource competition (Einhellig 1994). These biochemicals, or allelochemicals, are released from plants through volatilization, leaching, root exudation, and plant degradation during active growth as well as from plant residue (Weir et al. 2004). In this manner, cover crops provide weed suppression while growing and continue to provide a level of suppression after cover termination. A number of classes of allelochemicals, including phenolic acids, coumarins, and glucosinolates, have been identified in cover crop species (Vyvyan 2002). Although the specific means of plant inhibition for many allelochemicals are just beginning to be understood, the allelopathic weed potential of a number of cover crops is apparent in several studies (Burgos and Talbert 2000; Khanh et al. 2005; Norsworthy et al. 2005; Price et al. 2008; Walters and Young 2008).

In addition to allelopathy, cover crops can suppress weed seed germination and growth by plant residue modifications to the soil microenvironment (Masiunas et al. 1995). Cover crop residues on the soil surface can affect light availability, temperature, and moisture levels in the region of weed seed germination, reducing the number of germinating weed species (Creamer et al. 1996a). While plant residue remains on the soil surface, the physical interference of cover crops can continue to suppress weed species into the growing season. The high C : N ratio of cereal grains results in a slow degradation of cover crops, allowing for increased plant residue persistence over legume cover crops; brassica species tend to break down more rapidly than cereals but persist longer than legumes (SARE 2007). With increased weed control achieved with higher levels of plant residue, the use of cover crops adapted to specific environments can ensure adequate levels of biomass production for soil coverage and weed suppression in RT systems.

Brassica Cover Crops

A number of species in the Brassica family have been used as cover crops in several cropping systems, particularly vegetable and specialty crop production (SARE 2007). Brassica species such as wild radish, rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), black mustard (Brassica nigra L.), and white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) contain isothiocyanates (ITCs), derivatives of glucosinolates, that have noted pesticide properties including herbicidal activity (Norsworthy and Meehan 2005a; Malik et al. 2008). In addition to physical weed suppression from brassica covers, several species have shown the allelopathic effects of ITCs to inhibit germination of weed species such as redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia L.), and Palmer amaranth [Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats.] (Norsworthy 2003; Norsworthy and Meehan 2005a,b,c). Currently, use of brassicas in vegetable productions primarily is limited to green manures with soil incorporation prior to cash crop planting. Incorporation of brassica residue allows for biofumigant allelopathic suppression of soilborne diseases, nematodes, and weed species (Larkin et al. 2012; SARE 2007).

Relatively little research has been conducted on the potential for brassica cover crops to suppress weeds in RT cropping systems. Although research with brassica species has resulted in variable outcomes for weed suppression and crop sensitivity (Lawley et al. 2012), efforts have continued to evaluate unincorporated brassica cover crops. One such study showed early-season weed suppression by unincorporated wild radish to be equal to that achieved with a rye cover crop (Malik et al. 2008). Researchers in the Southeast continue to explore the multiple uses of brassica cover crops in vegetable and row crop production. Future efforts to determine how weed suppression is affected when brassica species are used as a ground cover as opposed to incorporated into the soil are necessary to determine the most effective ways to utilize these cover crops in RT vegetable systems.

Cereal Grain Cover Crops

Annual cereal grains are frequently used as winter cover crops for their winter hardiness and biomass production and as a catch crop for soil nitrogen (SARE 2007). Species such as rye, wheat, and black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.) are used throughout the Southeast, mainly in row crop production (Price et al. 2008). In addition to providing erosion control and scavenging N from the soil, grain cover crops can provide a level of weed control through both physical and allelopathic means. Rye, in particular, has been shown to be a hardy cover crop that can successfully compete with many weed species while actively growing. Benzoxazinoid compounds produced by some grains such as wheat and rye can exhibit allelopathic effects on various weed species (Macias et al. 2005). Cereal covers have been effective for inhibiting germination of weeds such as giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.), pigweed (Amaranthus spp.), horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.], and barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.] (Burgos and Talbert 1996; Przepiorkowski and Gorski 1994).

Research has evaluated weed suppression by cereal cover crops such as rye in RT row crops with positive results (Price et al. 2006; Reeves et al. 2005). However, limited research has been conducted with cereal covers in RT vegetable production systems, particularly in the Southeast. Mulvaney et al. (2011) did report reduced weed density after 3 yr of NT organic collard production including a high-residue rye cover crop. Continued efforts to identify improved practices for cover crop management and termination should help to increase the use of cereal grains as cover crop choices in vegetables.

Legume Cover Crops

A variety of legume cover crops are planted alone or in a mixture with grass covers to help reduce soil erosion, increase soil organic matter, and suppress weed species (SARE 2007). Additionally legume cover crops can fix nitrogen to be available for following cash crops. Species such as clover (Trifolium spp.), white lupin (Lupinus albus L.), Austrian winter pea [Pisum sativum L. ssp. arvense (L.) Poir.], and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) can function as cover crops in a number of crop production systems (Akemo et al. 2000; Daniel et al. 1999; Mohler and Teasdale 1993; Norsworthy et al. 2010). Allelopathy has been noted for some species such as cowpea, sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.), and velvetbean [Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC.]; however, chemical weed suppression has not been identified for most legumes typically used as cover crops (Adler and Chase 2007; Mosjidis and Wehtje 2011; Price et al. 2008). Successful weed control achieved by legumes is primarily attributed to biomass production, which can shade germinating weeds; however, legume cover crops tend to have a low C : N ratio and decompose rather quickly compared to other cover crops, which can reduce their potential for weed control further into the growing season (SARE 2007).

A number of studies have examined legume cover crop use in RT with results indicating that these covers perform best in a mixture with a cereal grain rather than in a monoculture (Brennan et al. 2009; Reberg-Horton et al. 2012; Yenish et al. 1996). Longer-term weed control may also be achieved when planting legumes in a mixture due to rapid decomposition of legume-only residue (Burgos and Talbert 1996). Research in RT tomato production outside the Southeast has reported high yields and successful weed control either alone or in mixture (Abdul-Baki et al. 1996; Creamer et al. 1996b). More recently, legume covers have been reported to provide early-season weed suppression but require subsequent herbicide applications to maintain season-long weed suppression in tomato (Saini et al. 2007).

Cover Crop Termination in Reduced-Tillage Systems

Regardless of the type of cover crop grown, management practices, particularly termination timing and method, are critical to ensuring that the cover crop functions as intended. Current recommendations for cover crop termination in vegetable production generally suggest plowing or disking of the cover crop (Anonymous 2012). In RT systems, however, cover crop biomass remains on the soil surface and timing of termination can affect multiple aspects of the cropping system such as water and nutrient availability and soil temperature. Implementing an earlier kill date for cover crops can reduce the loss of soil moisture and allow more rapid soil warming; a later kill date increases the amount of residue produced which can lead to enhanced weed suppression (Balkcom et al. 2007).

In addition to timing, mechanisms for terminating cover crops can vary depending on the type of cover crop. In general, cover crops grown for ground cover can be killed with herbicide applications, mowed, and/or rolled (Balkcom et al. 2007; Reberg-Horton et al. 2012). Rolling/crimping of cover crops has been the focus of recent research as a potential means of cover crop termination in low-input or organic systems; however, timing of rolling operations for effective termination without herbicides is species specific (Mirsky et al. 2009; Reberg-Horton et al. 2012). Cover crop regrowth during the primary crop growing season may be possible regardless of termination method and must be planned for in addition to the shift toward annual and perennial grasses typical of RT systems (Bàrberi 2002; Creamer and Dabney 2002; Mirsky et al. 2012).

Organic Vegetable Production

Despite environmental benefits that can be achieved through the use of organic practices, adopting organic systems in the Southeast can be challenging for several reasons. With little region-specific research or guidelines available to producers, implementing organic practices can be a costly trial-and-error undertaking; moreover, the warm, humid climate in the Southeast promotes high pest pressures in these organic systems that have limited control options (Mississippi State University 2011; Treadwell et al. 2007). As research continues, however, a number of fruit and vegetable crops, such as sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.], onion (Allium cepa L.), lettuce (Latuca sativa L.), squash (Cucurbita pepo L.), collard (Brassica oleracea L.), and bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) (Chellemi and Rosskopf 2004; Evans et al. 2006; Mulvaney et al. 2011; Treadwell et al. 2008; Vollmer et al. 2010), have been grown successfully in organic production systems of the Southeast.

Adopting RT practices in organic systems pose further challenges from a weed management standpoint. Effective weed control can be difficult to implement when standard weed management practices in organic production rely primarily on tillage and hand removal to obtain successful levels of weed control (Creamer and Baldwin 2000; Norsworthy and Meehan 2005a; Treadwell et al. 2007). The need to identify and develop multiple, alternative control strategies for integrated weed management in organic vegetable production in the southeastern United States has been recognized and continues to generate research to assist producers in the transition from conventional systems (Smith et al. 2007; Treadwell et al. 2007). To that end, a number of practices have been examined for their potential use in organic systems as alternative weed control measures. Among these practices are the use of mulches, soil solarization, seeding rates, cover crops, and integrated tactics using multiple practices (Figure 1). Addition of these practices into weed management systems may allow for increased utilization of RT in organic productions.

Cover crops, in particular, can be an integral component of integrated weed management systems in RT organic systems. Many studies in the Southeast have evaluated the efficacy of cover crops for weed control in RT organic vegetable production with most, but not all, results showing positive weed suppression by cover crops compared to fallow or no-cover systems (Chellemi and Rosskopf 2004; Norsworthy et al. 2007; Treadwell et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2008). However, weed control provided by covers should not be relied on as the exclusive weed control strategy, but covers may provide a level of suppression for some weed species (Norsworthy et al. 2007). Although no one practice can provide adequate weed control in organic vegetable production, use of cover crops in conjunction with other cultural control methods may provide sufficient weed suppression without the need for intense tillage practices.

Summary and Conclusions

With weed competition as one of the most problematic issues in vegetable production, weed control is at the forefront of research needs. Continued research efforts to determine successful methods for implementing RT as well as cover crops as ground cover are necessary to provide alternative weed control strategies. Research is needed to identify appropriate high-residue cover crop choices and integrated weed management practice for use in vegetable cropping systems, whether organic or conventional, that offer adequate weed control without reducing crop yield. Specifically, cover crop choice, planting, and termination guidelines for diverse cropping systems are needed that maximize cover biomass and subsequent weed suppression. In addition, weed management and cover crop termination during crop rotation transition continues to challenge RT organic producers. Ultimately, these types of research will help shape the future of more productive and sustainable vegetable systems across the Southeast.

Literature Cited

  1. A. A Abdul-Baki J. R Teasdale R Korcak D. J Chitwood and R. N Huettel 1996. Fresh-market tomato production in a low-input alternative system using cover-crop mulch. HortScience 31:65–69. Google Scholar

  2. M. J Adler and C. A Chase 2007. Comparison of the allelopathic potential of leguminous summer cover crops: cowpea, sunn hemp, and velvetbean. HortScience 42:289–293. Google Scholar

  3. M. C Akemo E. E Regnier and M. A Bennett 2000. Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereale)-pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mix. Weed Technol. 14:545–549. Google Scholar

  4. Anonymous. 2012. Southeastern U.S. Vegetable Crop Handbook—2012. Eds. J. M Kemble K Ivors F. J Louws K. M Jennings and J. F Walgenbach Southeastern Vegetable Extension Workers. Google Scholar

  5. K Balkcom H Schomberg W Reeves and A Clark 2007. Managing cover crops in conservation tillage systems. Pages 44–61 in A. Clarked. Managing Cover Crops Profitably. College Park, MD: Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education (SARE). Google Scholar

  6. S. K Bangarwa J. K Norsworthy and E. E Gbur 2009. Cover crop and herbicide combinations for weed control in polyethylene-mulched bell pepper. HortTechnology 19:405–410. Google Scholar

  7. P Bàrberi 2002. Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Res. 42:177–193. Google Scholar

  8. H Bottenberg J Masiunas and C Eastman 1999. Strip tillage reduced yield loss of snapbean planted in rye mulch. HortTechnology 9:235–240. Google Scholar

  9. E. B Brennan N. S Boyd R. F Smith and P Foster 2009. Seeding rate and planting arrangement effects on growth and weed suppression of a legume-oat cover crop for organic vegetable systems. Agron. J. 101:979–988. Google Scholar

  10. E. B Brennan and R. F Smith 2005. Winter cover crop growth and weed suppression on the Central Coast of California. Weed Technol. 19:1017–1024. Google Scholar

  11. N. R Burgos and R. E Talbert 1996. Weed control and sweet corn (Zea mays var. rugosa) response in a no-till system with cover crops. Weed Sci. 44:355–361. Google Scholar

  12. N. R Burgos and R. E Talbert 2000. Differential activity of allelochemicals from Secale cereale in seedling bioassays. Weed Sci. 48:302–310. Google Scholar

  13. W. J Busscher and P. J Bauer 2003. Soil strength, cotton root growth and lint yield in a southeastern USA coastal loamy sand. Soil Tillage Res. 74:151–159. Google Scholar

  14. D. O Chellemi and E. N Rosskopf 2004. Yield potential and soil quality under alternative crop production practices for fresh market pepper. Renewable Agric. Food Syst. 19:168–175. Google Scholar

  15. N. G Creamer and K. R Baldwin 2000. An evaluation of summer cover crops for use in vegetable production systems in North Carolina. HortScience 35:600–603. Google Scholar

  16. N. G Creamer M. A Bennett B. R Stinner J Cardina and E. E Regnier 1996a. Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop-based production systems. HortScience 31:410–413. Google Scholar

  17. N. G Creamer M. A Bennett B. R Stinner and J Cardina 1996b. A comparison of four processing tomato production systems differing in cover crop and chemical inputs. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 121:559–568. Google Scholar

  18. N. G Creamer and S. M Dabney 2002. Killing cover crops mechanically: Review of recent literature and assessment of new research results. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 17:32–40. Google Scholar

  19. J. B Daniel A. O Abaye M. M Alley C. W Adcock and J. C Maitland 1999. Winter annual cover crops in a Virginia no-till cotton production system: I. Biomass production, ground cover, and nitrogen assimilation. J. Cotton Sci. 3:74–83. Google Scholar

  20. F. A Einhellig 1994. Allelopathy: current status and future goals. Pages 1–24 in D Inderjit K.M.M Dakshini and F. A Einhellig eds. Allelopathy. Washington, DC: American Chemistry Society. Google Scholar

  21. W. B Evans K. W Hood P. M Hudson and K. L Paridon 2006. Organic vegetable culture in Mississippi: growing and profitable. Abstracts of the ASHS Southern Region 66th Annual Meeting. HortScience 40:509. Google Scholar

  22. R. S Feldman C. E Holmes and T. A Blomgren 2000. Use of fabric and compost mulches for vegetable production in a low tillage, permanent bed system: effects on crop yield and labor. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 15:146–153. Google Scholar

  23. A. L Fernandez C. C Sheaffer D. L Wyse and T. E Michaels 2012. Yield and weed abundance in early- and late-sown field pea and lentil. Agron. J. 104:1056–1064. Google Scholar

  24. N. L Hartwig and H. U Ammon 2002. Cover crops and living mulches. Weed Sci. 50:688–699. Google Scholar

  25. T. D Khanh M. I Chung T. D Xuan and S Tawata 2005. The exploitation of crop allelopathy in sustainable agricultural productions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191:172–184. Google Scholar

  26. R. P Larkin C. W Honeycutt O. M Olanya J. M Halloran and Z He 2012. Impacts of crop rotation and irrigation on soilborne diseases and soil microbial communities. Pages 23–41 in Z He R Larkin and W Honeycutt eds. Sustainable Potato Production: Global Case Studies. New York: Springer. Google Scholar

  27. D. M Law A. B Rowell and J. C Snyder 2006. Weed control efficacy of organic mulches in two organically managed bell pepper production systems. HortTechnology 16:225–232. Google Scholar

  28. Y. E Lawley J. R Teasdale and R. R Weil 2012. The mechanism for weed suppression by a forage radish cover crop. Agron. J. 104:205–214. Google Scholar

  29. S. J Locascio J. P Gilreath S Olson C. M Hutchinson and C. A Chase 2005. Red and black mulch color affects production of Florida strawberries. HortScience 40:69–71. Google Scholar

  30. F. A Macias A Oliveros-Bastidas D Marin D Castellano A. M Simonet and J. M. G Molinillo 2005. Degradation studies on benzoxazinoids. Soil degradation dynamics of (2R)-2-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-4-hydroxy-(2H)-1,4-benzoxazin-3(4H)-one (DIBOA-Glc) and its degradation products, phytotoxic allelochemicals from Gramineae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:554–561. Google Scholar

  31. N. M Madden J. P Mitchell W. T Lanini M. D Cahn E. V Herrero S Park S. R Temple and M Van Horn 2004. Evaluation of conservation tillage and cover crop systems for organic processing tomato production. HortTechnology 14:243–250. Google Scholar

  32. M. S Malik J. K Norsworthy A. S Culpepper M. B Riley and W Bridges Jr 2008. Wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) and rye cover crops for weed suppression in sweet corn. Weed Sci. 56:588–595. Google Scholar

  33. J Masiunas E Wahle L Barmore and A Morgan 2003. A foam mulching system to control weeds in tomatoes and sweet basil. HortTechnology 13:324–328. Google Scholar

  34. J. B Masiunas L. A West and S. C Weller 1995. The impact of rye cover crops on weed populations in a tomato cropping system. Weed Sci. 43:318–323. Google Scholar

  35. S. B Mirsky W. S Curran D. A Mortensen M. R Ryan and D. L Shumway 2009. Control of cereal rye with a roller/crimper as influenced by cover crop phenology. Agron. J. 101:1589–1596. Google Scholar

  36. S. B Mirsky M. R Ryan W. S Curran J. R Teasdale J Maul J. T Spargo J Moyer A. M Grantham D Weber T. R Way and G. G Camargo 2012. Conservation tillage issues: cover crop-based organic rotational no-till grain production in the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 27:31–40. Google Scholar

  37. Mississippi State University. 2011. Organic Crops.  http://msucares.com/crops/comhort/organic_veg_fruit.html. Accessed January 9, 2012. Google Scholar

  38. C. L Mohler and J. R Teasdale 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33:487–499. Google Scholar

  39. R Morse 2000. High-residue, no-till systems for production of organic broccoli. Pages 48–50 in Proceedings of the Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture.  Google Scholar

  40. J. A Mosjidis and G Wehtje 2011. Weed control in sunn hemp and its ability to suppress weed growth. Crop Prot. 30:70–73. Google Scholar

  41. M. J Mulvaney A. J Price and C. W Wood 2011. Cover crop residue and organic mulches provide weed control during limited-input no-till collard production. J. Sustain. Agric. 35:312–328. Google Scholar

  42. J. K Norsworthy 2003. Allelopathic potential of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Weed Technol. 17:307–313. Google Scholar

  43. J. K Norsworthy L Brandenberger N. R Burgos and M Riley 2005. Weed suppression in Vigna unguiculata with a spring-seeded Brassicaceae green manure. Crop Prot. 24:441–447. Google Scholar

  44. J. K Norsworthy M. S Malik P Jha and M. B Riley 2007. Suppression of Digitaria sanguinalis and Amaranthus palmeri using autumn-sown glucosinolate-producing cover crops in organically grown bell pepper. Weed Res. 47:425–432. Google Scholar

  45. J. K Norsworthy M McClelland G Griffith S. K Bangarwa and J Still 2011. Evaluation of cereal and Brassicaceae cover crops in conservation-tillage, enhanced, glyphosate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol. 25:6–13. Google Scholar

  46. J. K Norsworthy and J. T Meehan IV 2005a. Use of isothiocyantes for suppression of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 53:884–890. Google Scholar

  47. J. K Norsworthy and J. T Meehan IV 2005b. Herbicidal activity of eight isothiocyanates on Texas panicum (Panicum texanum), large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 53:515–520. Google Scholar

  48. J. K Norsworthy and J. T Meehan IV 2005c. Wild radish-amended soil effects on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) interference with tomato and bell pepper. Weed Sci. 53:77–83. Google Scholar

  49. M. B Peoples D. F Herridge and J. K Ladha 1995. Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production? Plant Soil 174:3–28. Google Scholar

  50. S. C Phatak J. R Dozier A. G Bateman K. E Brunson and N. L Martini 2002. Cover crops and conservation tillage in sustainable vegetable production. In E van Santen ed. Making Conservation Tillage Conventional: Building a Future on 25 Years of Research. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture.  Google Scholar

  51. A. J Price K. S Balkcom S. A Culpepper J. A Kelton R. L Nichols and H Schomberg 2011. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth: a threat to conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 66:265–275. Google Scholar

  52. A. J Price D. W Reeves and M. G Patterson 2006. Evaluation of weed control provided by three winter cereals in conservation tillage soybean. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 21:159–164. Google Scholar

  53. A. J Price M. E Stoll J. S Bergtold F. J Arriaga K. S Balkcom T. S Kornecki and R. L Raper 2008. Effect of cover crop extracts on cotton and radish radicle elongation. Commun. Biometry Crop Sci. 3:60–66. Google Scholar

  54. T Przepiorkowski and S. F Gorski 1994. Influence of rye (Secale cereale) plant residues on germination and growth of three triazine-resistant and susceptible weeds. Weed Technol. 8:744–747. Google Scholar

  55. R. L Raper D. W Reeves and E. C Burt 1998. Using in-row subsoiling to minimize soil compaction caused by traffic. J. Cotton Sci. 2:130–135. Google Scholar

  56. S. C Reberg-Horton J. M Grossman T. S Kornecki A. D Meijer A. J Price G. T Place and T. M Webster 2012. Utilizing cover crop mulches to reduce tillage in organic systems in the southeastern USA. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 27:41–48. Google Scholar

  57. D. W Reeves 1994. Cover crops and rotations. Pages 125–172 in J. L Hatfield and B. A Stewart eds. Advances in Soil Science—Crops Residue Management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishing. Google Scholar

  58. D. W Reeves A. J Price and M. G Patterson 2005. Evaluation of three winter cereals for weed control in conservation-tillage nontransgenic cotton. Weed Technol. 19:731–736. Google Scholar

  59. P. J Rice L. L McConnell L. P Heighton A. M Sadeghi A. R Isensee J. R Teasdale A. A Abdul-Baki J. A Harmen-Fetcho and C. J Hapeman 2001. Runoff loss of pesticides and soil: a comparison between vegetative mulch and plastic mulch in vegetable production systems. J. Environ. Qual. 30:1808–1821. Google Scholar

  60. M Saini A. J Price T. S Kornecki and A Caylor 2007. Weed control in conservation tillage tomatoes following herbicide and cover crop residue integration. Page 155 in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Southern Weed Science Society. Google Scholar

  61. [SARE] Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education. 2007. Managing Cover Crops Profitably. 3rd edition. A Clark ed. Park. CollegeMD: SARE. Google Scholar

  62. H. H Schomberg R. G McDaniel E Mallard D. M Endale D. S Fisher and M. L Cabrera 2006. Conservation tillage and cover crop influences on cotton production on a southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain soil. Agron. J. 98:1247–1256. Google Scholar

  63. B. P Singh D. M Granberry W. T Kelley G Boyhan U. M Sainju S. C Phatak P. E Sumner M. J Bader T. M Webster A. S Culpepper D. G Riley D. B Langston and G Fonsah 2005. Sustainable vegetable production. Pages 1–38 in R Dris ed. Vegetables: Growing Environment and Mineral Nutrition. Helsinki, Finland: WFL Publisher. Google Scholar

  64. R. W Smith T Lanini J Mitchell S. T Koike and C Fouche 2007. Weed management for organic crops.  http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/7250.pdf. Accessed January 11, 2012. Google Scholar

  65. S Thornsbury and A Jerardo 2012. Vegetables and pulses outlook. USDA VGS-349.  http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/vgs/2012/03Mar/VGS349.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2012. Google Scholar

  66. H. A Torbert and D. W Reeves 1994. Fertilizer nitrogen requirements for cotton production as affected by tillage and traffic. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:1416–1423. Google Scholar

  67. D. D Treadwell N. G Creamer G. D Hoyt and J. R Schultheis 2008. Nutrient management with cover crops and compost affects development and yield in organically managed sweetpotato systems. HortScience 43:1423–1433. Google Scholar

  68. D. D Treadwell N. G Creamer J. R Schultheis and G. D Hoyt 2007. Cover crop management affects weeds and yield in organically managed sweetpotato systems. Weed Technol. 21:1039–1048. Google Scholar

  69. G. B Triplett and W. A Dick 2008. No-tillage crop production: a revolution in agriculture! Agron. J. 100:153–165. Google Scholar

  70. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service. 2012. Per Capita Availability Data Table.  http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/vgs/tables/percap.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2012. Google Scholar

  71. E. R Vollmer N Creamer C Reberg-Horton and G Hoyt 2010. Evaluating cover crop mulches for no-till organic production of onions. HortScience 45:61–70. Google Scholar

  72. J. R Vyvyan 2002. Allelochemicals as leads for new herbicides and agrochemicals. Tetrahedron 58:1631–1646. Google Scholar

  73. J. P Yenish A. D Worsham and A. C York 1996. Cover crops for herbicide replacement in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 10:815–821. Google Scholar

  74. S. A Walters and B. G Young 2008. Utility of winter rye living mulch for weed management in zucchini squash production. Weed Technol. 22:724–728. Google Scholar

  75. S. A Walters and B. G Young 2012. Herbicide application timings on weed control and jack-o-lantern pumpkin yield. HortTechnology 22:201–206. Google Scholar

  76. K Wang R McSorley R. N Gallaher and N Kokalis-Burelle 2008. Cover crops and organic mulches for nematode, weed and plant health management. Nematology 10:231–242. Google Scholar

  77. J. P Warnick C. A Chase E. N Rosskopf J. M Scholberg E. H Simonne R. L Koenig and N. E Roe 2006a. Hydramulch for muskmelon and bell pepper crop production systems. J. Veg. Sci. 12:39–55. Google Scholar

  78. J. P Warnick C. A Chase E. N Rosskopf E. H Simonne J. M Scholberg R. L Koenig and N. E Roe 2006b. Weed suppression with hydramulch, a biodegradable liquid paper mulch in development. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 21:216–223. Google Scholar

  79. T. L Weir S Park and J. M Vivanco 2004. Biochemical and physiological mechanisms mediated by allelochemicals. Plant Biol. 7:472–479. Google Scholar

Figure 1.

Auburn University research plot evaluating a polyethylene/cover crop mulch integrated system pioneered by Mr. Bob Rollins, watermelon producer, Turner County, Georgia.

i0890-037X-27-1-212-f01.tif
Andrew J. Price and Jason. K. Norsworthy "Cover Crops for Weed Management in Southern Reduced-Tillage Vegetable Cropping Systems," Weed Technology 27(1), (1 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-12-00056.1
Received: 2 April 2012; Accepted: 30 August 2012; Published: 1 March 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top