How to translate text using browser tools
18 August 2020 The influence of soybean population and POST herbicide application timing on in-season and subsequent-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control and economic returns
Denis J. Mahoney, David L. Jordan, Andrew T. Hare, Nilda Roma-Burgos, Katherine M. Jennings, Ramon G. Leon, Matthew C. Vann, Wesley J. Everman, Charles W. Cahoon
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Overreliance on herbicides for weed control has led to the evolution of herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth populations. Farm managers should consider the long-term consequences of their short-term management decisions, especially when considering the soil weed seedbank. The objectives of this research were to (1) determine how soybean population and POST herbicide application timing affects in-season Palmer amaranth control and soybean yield, and (2) how those variables influence Palmer amaranth densities and cotton yields the following season. Soybeans were planted (19-cm row spacing) at a low-, medium-, and high-density population (268,000, 546,000, and 778,000 plants ha–1, respectively). Fomesafen and clethodim (280 and 210 g ai ha–1, respectively) were applied at the VE, V1, or V2 to V3 soybean growth stage. Nontreated plots were also included to assess the effect of soybean population alone. The following season, cotton was planted into these plots so as to understand the effects of soybean planting population on Palmer amaranth densities in the subsequent crop. When an herbicide application occurred at the V1 or V2 to V3 soybean stage, weed control in the high-density soybean population increased 17% to 23% compared to the low-density population. Economic return was not influenced by soybean population and was increased 72% to 94% with herbicide application compared to no treatment. In the subsequent cotton crop, Palmer amaranth densities were 24% to 39% lower 3 wk after planting when following soybean sprayed with herbicides compared to soybean without herbicides. Additionally, Palmer amaranth densities in cotton were 19% lower when soybean was treated at the VE stage compared to later stages. Thus, increasing soybean population can improve Palmer amaranth control without adversely affecting economic returns and can reduce future weed densities. Reducing the weed seedbank and selection pressure from herbicides are critical in mitigating resistance evolution.

Nomenclature: Clethodim; fomesafen; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.

© Weed Science Society of America, 2020.
Denis J. Mahoney, David L. Jordan, Andrew T. Hare, Nilda Roma-Burgos, Katherine M. Jennings, Ramon G. Leon, Matthew C. Vann, Wesley J. Everman, and Charles W. Cahoon "The influence of soybean population and POST herbicide application timing on in-season and subsequent-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control and economic returns," Weed Technology 35(1), 106-112, (18 August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.87
Received: 20 March 2020; Accepted: 28 July 2020; Published: 18 August 2020
KEYWORDS
Cultural practices
resistance management
Weed interference
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top