Translator Disclaimer
23 April 2012 Use of a native predator for the control of an invasive amphibian
Author Affiliations +

Context. The control of invasive alien species is essential for securing native biodiversity. As for the American bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus (Shaw 1802), suspected to cause ecological damage around large parts of the globe, comprehensive management techniques are currently absent.

Aims. To fill this gap, opportunities arising from biomanipulation of permanent water bodies inhabited by fish were explored.

Methods. A multi-annual experiment was performed in small and shallow ponds, and effects of complete drawdown (with amphibian and fish removal) and predation (introduction of originally occurring native northern pike, Esox lucius) on non-indigenous bullfrogs were investigated.

Key results. The presence of pike lead to a strong decline in bullfrog tadpole numbers, whereas no effect of drawdown was observed. Also, communities receiving pike harboured substantially less small and mostly planktivorous fish species (e.g. pumpkinseed, Lepomis gibbosus, and topmouth gudgeon, Pseudorasbora parva).

Conclusions. The reduction in bullfrog tadpoles may be assigned to both direct and indirect effects induced by pike. First, direct pike predation on tadpoles was observed. Second, as the occurrence of macroinvertebrate-feeding pumpkinseed was low in the presence of pike, the indirect effect of predation by macroinvertebrates on tadpoles may significantly increase, leading to tadpole decline.

Implications. Biomanipulation of permanent water bodies inhabited by fish can thus be regarded as a candidate for effective and sustainable control of invasive bullfrog. Piscivorous fish introduction may be applied in the specific type of water body, but requires careful consideration of the indigenous status of the introduced species, angling purposes, or specific nature values.

© CSIRO 2012
Gerald Louette "Use of a native predator for the control of an invasive amphibian," Wildlife Research 39(3), 271-278, (23 April 2012).
Received: 19 July 2011; Accepted: 1 February 2012; Published: 23 April 2012

Get copyright permission
Back to Top