Morphological characters of fruits and seeds of 23 Cuban species are studied. The fruits consist of 1–5 small 1-seeded and modified follicles. The pericarp is made of a woody exocarp and a pergamentous to cartilaginous endocarp. Fruitlet dehiscence takes place slowly and the shiny dark seed persists in the dehisced follicle. In spite of some variability in the shape of fruitlets and seeds as well as in the mode of follicle dehiscence, fruitlets and seeds provide taxonomically relevant combinations of characters. There are differences in the mode of endocarp detachment (a full detachment in one group and a partial detachment in another one), and there are differences in the mode of dehiscence (“semivalvate” or “bivalvate”) as well as in the presentation of the seed (either hanging on the detached placenta and placentar bundle, or exposured by the exocarpic or endocarpic valves). These characters occur in combination with a specific shape of follicle and seed. For Cuban species five types are described. In the light of these results and in connection with the morphology of the gynoecia Engler's grouping system of the Zanthoxylum species with biseriate perianth is discussed.
Ch. Beurton
1994: Gynoecium and perianth in Zanthoxylum s.l. (Rutaceae).
— Pl. Syst. Evol. 189: 165–191. Google Scholar
C. Brückner
1990: Fruchtanatomische Studien an Dictamnus albus L., Zanthoxylum simulans Hance, Ptelea trifoliata L. und Ruta graveolens L. (Rutaceae).
— Feddes Repert. 102: 541–570. Google Scholar
A. Engler
1931:
Rutaceae.
— Pp. 187–139 in:
A. Engler
&
K. Prantl
(ed.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, 19a. — Leipzig. Google Scholar
R. Fish
&
P. G. Waterman
1973: The chemosystematics of the Zanthoxylum/Fagara complex. — Taxon 22: 177–203. Google Scholar
H.-.T. Gregor
1977:
Zanthoxylum wemdingense nov. spec. aus untersarmatischen Riessee-Abla-gerungen. — Mitt. Bayer. Staatssamml. Paläont. Hist. Geol. 17: 249–256. Google Scholar
D. Hartl
1957: Struktur und Herkunft des Endokarps der Rutaceen. — Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 34: 35–49. Google Scholar
D. Hartl
—
1958: Die Übereinstimmung des Endokarps der Simaroubaceen. Rutaceen und Leguminosen.
— Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 34: 452–455. Google Scholar
T. G. Hartley
1981: A revision of the genus Tetradium (Rutaceae).
— Gard. Bull. Singapore 34: 91–131. Google Scholar
L. Van der Pijl
1982: Principles of dispersal in higher plants, ed. 3. — Berlin, etc. Google Scholar
E. Ramp
1988: Struktur, Funktion und systematische Bedeutung des Gynoeciums bei den Rutaceae und Simaroubaceae.
— Dissertation, Universität Zürich. Google Scholar
R. Spichiger
&
L. Stutz de Ortega
1987:
Rutaceae. — In:
R. Spichiger
(ed.), Flora del Paraguay [8], — Genf. Google Scholar
W. W. Spjut
1994: A systematic treatment of fruit types. — Mem. New York Bot. Garden 70. Google Scholar
B. H. Tiffney
1980: Fruits and seeds of the Brandon Lignite. — J. Arnold Arbor. 61: 1–40. Google Scholar
I. Urban
1896:
Rutaceae.
— Pp. 551–614 in:
I. Urban
(ed.). Additamenta ad cognitionem florae Indiae occidentalis III. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 21: 514–638. Google Scholar
P. G. Waterman
1974: A review of the chemosystematics of the genus Zanthoxylum (Rutaceae).
— Pp. 109–130 in:
B. C. Stone
(ed.). The role and goals of tropical botanic gardens. — Kuala Lumpur. Google Scholar
P. G. Waterman
,
1990: Chemosystematics of the Rutaceae: comments on the interpretation of Da Silva & al. — Pl. Syst. Evol. 173: 39–48. Google Scholar
R. Wettstein
1935: Handbuch der systematischen Botanik, ed. 4, 1–2. — Leipzig & Wien. Google Scholar
