Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
25 August 2004 Angostura ossana (Rutaceae), a component of the Cuban flora
Christa Beurton
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Beurton, C.: Angostura ossana (Rutaceae), a component of the Cuban flora. — Willdenowia 34: 277– 289. — ISSN 0511-9618; © 2004 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.

The enigmatic Galipea ossana, described in 1822 and known from the type specimen said to originate from Cuba and only one other collections made before 1841 in a locality called San Diego, is reconsidered. Light microscopic and scanning electron microscopic examination of flower structure, fruits and pollen grains of the scarce material available show that the species actually is the only representative of the genus Angostura on the Antilles and a W Cuban endemic, closely related to A. trifoliata from Venezuela. The combination A. ossana is validated and the diagnostic features of this species and of A. trifoliata are illustrated.

See the PDF.

References

1.

Alain hno. 1958: La flora de Cuba: sus principales caracteristicas. Su origen probable. — Revista Soc. Cub. Bot. 15: 36–59, 84–96. Google Scholar

2.

R. Berazaín Itturalde , C. Beurton & A. J. Urquiola Cruz 2000: Zanthoxylum duplicipunctatum C. Wright ex Griseb.: rediscovery of a Rutaceae after 136 years. — Pp. 15 in: Anonymous (ed.), Symposium Flora of the Greater Antilles, 23–24 June 2000. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. Abstracts of posters. — New York. Google Scholar

3.

A. de Candolle 1822: Cuspariées. III. Galipea Aublet. — Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. 9: 148–152. Google Scholar

4.

M. Gómez de la Maza [y Jiménez] 1889: Diccionario botánico de los nombres vulgares Cubanos y Puerto-Riqueños. — La Habana. Google Scholar

5.

A. Engler 1874: Rutaceae. — Pp. 77–196 in: C. F. P. [von] Martius (ed.), Flora brasiliensis 12(2). — München, etc. Google Scholar

6.

A. Engler 1896: Rutaceae. — Pp. 95–201 in: A. Engler & K. Prantl (ed.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 3(4). — Leipzig. Google Scholar

7.

A. Engler 1931: Rutaceae. — Pp. 187–359, 459–459 in: A. Engler & K. Prantl (ed.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, 19a. — Leipzig. Google Scholar

8.

G. Erdtman 1960: The acetolysis method. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 54: 561–564. Google Scholar

9.

P. K. Holmgren , N. H. Holmgren & L. C. Barnett (ed.) 1990: Index herbariorum I. The herbaria of the world, ed. 8. — Regnum Veg. 120. Google Scholar

10.

J. A. Kallunki 1994: Revision of Raputia Aubl. (Cuspariinae, Rutaceae). — Brittonia 46: 279–295. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11.

J. R. Kallunki 1998: Revision of Ticorea Aubl. (Rutaceae, Galipeinae). — Brittonia 50: 500–513. Google Scholar

12.

J. R. Kallunki & J. R. Pirani 1998: Synopses of Angostura Roem. & Schult, and Conchocarpus J. C. Mikan (Rutaceae). — Kew Bull. 53: 257–334. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13.

León hno. & Alain hno. 1951: Flora de Cuba 2. Dicotiledóneas: Casuarinaceas a Meliaceas. — Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat. Colegio “De La Salle” 10. Google Scholar

14.

C. M. Morton & J. A. Kallunki 1993: Pollen morphology of the subtribe Cuspariinae (Rutaceae). — Brittonia 45: 286–314. [ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15.

A. Richard 1841 [-1851 ]: Botanique, plants vasculaires. — In: R. de la Sagra (ed.), Histoire physique, politique et naturelle de l'Ile de Cuba. — Paris. Google Scholar

16.

I. Urban 1898: Symbolae antillanae 1. — Berlin, etc. Google Scholar
© 2004 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.
Christa Beurton "Angostura ossana (Rutaceae), a component of the Cuban flora," Willdenowia 34(1), 277-289, (25 August 2004). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.34.34122
Published: 25 August 2004
Back to Top