Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
9 December 2010 Notes on some endemic Cuban species of Ruelliinae (Acanthaceae), on their seeds, pollen morphology and hygroscopic features
Werner Greuter, Rosa Rankin Rodríguez
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ruellia shaferiana, a seldom collected and incompletely known species, is described in detail and compared with two vegetatively similar Cuban endemics, Dyschoriste bayatensis and the recently described Hygrophila urquiolae, and with the two Cuban species of Apassalus (A. cubensis and A. parvulus). All are placed by Scotland and Vollesen, in their classification of Acanthaceae, in the newly circumscribed subtribe Ruelliinae. Contrary to Dyschoriste, the other taxa studied have anther thecae that lack basal awns. Absence of these awns is the single character distinguishing Apassalus from Dyschoriste, and it has been suggested that both be combined. Our results lend support to that suggestion and prompt the transfer of A. parvulus to Dyschoriste. Study of pollen by SEM confirms the generic placement of the species studied, again associating Apassalus with Dyschoriste. Seed indumentum was studied by LM and REM, complementing earlier studies of the remarkable hygroscopic mucilaginous hairs, which apparently characterise the subtribe. Hygrochastic capsule dehiscence was detected in all four species. Pre-dawn anthesis and flowers withering by noon were observed in R. shaferiana. H. urquiolae, only known from a small area in W Cuba, is newly reported from E Cuba, and conversely, W Cuban occurrences of R. shaferiana are put on record. For three of the names lectotypes are designated, as Urban's original material was destroyed in Berlin in World War II.

See the PDF.

References

1.

Alain bro. 1956: Novedades en la flora cubana (VII). — Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat. Colegio “De La Salle” 15: 6–23. Google Scholar

2.

Alain bro. 1957: Flora de Cuba 4. — Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat. Colegio “De La Salle” 16. Google Scholar

3.

Alain bro. [Liogier H. A.] 1995: La flora de la Española 7. — San Pedro de Macorís: Universidad Central del Este. Google Scholar

4.

Anonymous 2010: Index to plant chromosome numbers. — Missouri Botanical Garden, published at  http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/ipcn.html [consulted June 2010]. Google Scholar

5.

G. Bentham 1876: Ordo CXXII. Acanthaceae. — Pp. 1060–1122 in: G. Bentham & J. D. Hooker , Genera plantarum ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis kewensibus servata definita 2. — London: Reeve & Co. Google Scholar

6.

C. E. B. Bremekamp 1926: On the opening mechanism of the acanthaceous fruit. — S. African J. Sci. 23: 488–491. Google Scholar

7.

C. E. B. Bremekamp 1965: Delimitation and subdivision of the Acanthaceae. — Bull. Bot. Surv. India. 7: 21–20. Google Scholar

8.

T. F. Daniel 1998: Pollen morphology of Mexican Acanthaceae: diversity and systematic significance. — Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 50: 217–256. Google Scholar

9.

G. Erdtman 1960: The acetolysis method — a revised description. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 54: 561–564. Google Scholar

10.

C. Ezcurra 1993: Systematics of Ruellia (Acanthaceae) in southern South America. —  Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 787–845. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11.

C. Ezcurra & T. F. Daniel 2007: Ruellia simplex, an older and overlooked name for Ruellia tweediana and Ruellia coerulea (Acanthaceae). — Darwiniana 45: 201–203. Google Scholar

12.

C. A. Furness 1994: The pollen morphology of Hygrophila and Brillantaisia (Acanthaceae: Ruellieae). — Acta Bot. Gall. 141: 267–278. Google Scholar

13.

C. A. Furness 1995: A pollen morphological study of Dyschoriste Nees and Chaetacanthus Nees (Acanthaceae: Ruellieae). —  Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 84: 331–345. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14.

C. A. Furness & M. C. Grant 1996: Pollen morphology of some Ruellia species (Acanthaceae) from Africa and Madagascar. — Grana 35: 231–239. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15.

W. Greuter , R. Rankin Rodríguez & A. Palmarola 2010: Hygrophila urquiolae (Acanthaceae), a new wetland species from Cuba. —  Willdenowia 39: 285– 291. Google Scholar

16.

R. A. Hilsebeck 1976: Reports [in Á. Löve (ed.), IOPB chromosome number reports LII]. — Taxon 25: 345. Google Scholar

17.

R. Kippist 1842: On the existence of spiral cells in the seeds of Acanthaceae. — Trans. Linn. Soc. London 19: 65–76. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18.

C. E. Kobuski 1928a: A new genus of the Acanthaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 15: 1–8. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19.

C. E. Kobuski 1928b: A monograph of the American species of the genus Dyschoriste. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 15: 9–90. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20.

B. E. Leuenberger 1976: Die Pollenmorphologie der Cactaceae und ihre Bedeutung für die Systematik: mit Beiträgen zur Methodik rasterelektronenmikroskopischer Pollenuntersuchungen und mit EDV-untersttitzten Korrelationsanalysen. — Diss. Bot. 31. Google Scholar

21.

G. Lindau 1893: Beiträge zur Systematik der Acanthaceen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 18: 36– 64. Google Scholar

22.

G. Lindau 1895: Acanthaceae — Pp. 274–354 in: A. Engler & K. Prantl (ed.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigeren Arten, insbesondere den Nutzpflanzen 4(3b). — Leipzig: Engelmann. Google Scholar

23.

R. W. Long 1970: The genera of Acanthaceae in the southeastern United States. — J. Arnold Arbor. 51: 257–309. Google Scholar

24.

R. W. Long 1973: A biosystematic approach to generic delimitation in Ruellia (Acanthaceae). —  Taxon 22: 543–555. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25.

D. J. Mabberley 1987: The plant book: a portable dictionary of the higher plants. — Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University. Google Scholar

26.

D. J. Mabberley 2008: Mabberley's plant book: a portable dictionary of the higher plants, ed. 3. — Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University. Google Scholar

27.

L. A. McDade & E. A. Tripp 2007: A synopsis of Costa Rican Ruellia (Acanthaceae), with descriptions of four new species. —  Brittonia 59: 199–216. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28.

C. G. Nees 1847: Ordo CXLV. Acanthaceae. — Pp. 46–521, 720–732 in: A. L. P. P. de Candolle (ed.). Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 11. — Paris: Treuttel & Würtz. Google Scholar

29.

G. Oehm 1932: Beitrag zur Morphologie und Anatomie einiger Acanthaceen-Früchte und -Samen. — Beih. Bot. Centralbl., Abt. 1, 49: 413–444. Google Scholar

30.

L. Radlkofer 1883: Über den systematischen Werth der Pollen-Beschaffenheit bei den Acanthaceen. – Sitzungsber. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. München 13: 256–314. Google Scholar

31.

B. Raj 1961: Pollen morphological studies in the Acanthaceae. — Grana Palynol. 3: 3–108. Google Scholar

32.

J. T. Roig y Mesa 1963: Diccionario botánico de nombres vulgares cubanos, ed. 3. — Santiago de las Vegas: Estación Experimental Agronómica. Google Scholar

33.

E. Schaffnit 1906: Beiträge zur Anatomie der Acanthaceen-Samen. — Beih. Bot. Centralbl., Abt. 1, 19: 453—521. Google Scholar

34.

R. W. Scotland 1993: Pollen morphology of Contortae (Acanthaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 111: 471–504. Google Scholar

35.

R. W. Scotland & K. Vollesen 2000: Classification of Acanthaceae. —  Kew Bull. 55: 513–589. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36.

Y. Sell 1969: La dissémination des acanthacées. Variations sur le type xérochasique fondamental. — Rev. Gén. Bot. 76: 417–453. Google Scholar

37.

K. Stopp 1958: Die verbreitungshemmenden Einrichtungen in der südafrikanischen Flora. — Bot. Stud. 8. Google Scholar

38.

E. A. Tripp 2007: Evolutionary relationships within the species-rich genus Ruellia (Acanthaceae). —  Syst. Bot. 32: 628–649. [  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39.

E. A. Tripp , T. F. Daniel , J. C. Lendemer & L. A. McDade 2009: New molecular and morphological insights prompt transfer of Blechum to Ruellia (Acanthaceae). —  Taxon 58: 893–906. Google Scholar

40.

I. Urban 1912: Acanthaceae [in: Nova genera et species V], — Pp. 380–391 in: I. Urban (ed.), Symbolae antillanae seu fundamenta florae Indiae occidentalis 7. — Leipzig: Borntraeger. Google Scholar

41.

I. Urban 1923: II. Plantae cubenses novae vel rariores a clo. Er. L. Ekman lectae I. — Pp. 59–176 in: I. Urban (ed.). Symbolae antillanae seu fundamenta florae Indiae occidentalis 9. — Leipzig: Borntraeger. Google Scholar

42.

D. B. Ward 2007: Keys to the flora of Florida — 17, Ruellia (Acanthaceae). — Phytologia 89: 293–299. Google Scholar

43.

D. C. Wasshausen 2005: 156. Acanthaceae incl. Thunbergiaceae. — Pp. 1–141 in: A. R. A. Görts van Rijn (ed.), Flora of the Guianas. Series A. Phanerogams. 23. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

44.

D. C. Wasshausen 2010: Acanthaceae [in: Flora of the West Indies. Catalogue of seed plants of the West Indies. Plants of Cuba], — Smithsonian Institution, Washington, published at  http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/results.cfm?formid=cu  Google Scholar

45.

D. C. Wasshausen & J. R. I. Wood 2004: Acanthaceae of Bolivia. — Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 49. Google Scholar

46.

R. P. Wunderlin & B. F. Hansen 2010: Atlas of Florida vascular plants. — Institute for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida, Tampa, published at  http://florida.plantatlas.usf.edu/  Google Scholar
© 2010 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.
Werner Greuter and Rosa Rankin Rodríguez "Notes on some endemic Cuban species of Ruelliinae (Acanthaceae), on their seeds, pollen morphology and hygroscopic features," Willdenowia 40(2), 285-304, (9 December 2010). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.40.40210
Published: 9 December 2010
KEYWORDS
Apassalus
bionics
Dyschoriste bayatensis
Dyschoriste parvula
hygrochasy
Hygrophila urquiolae
mucilage
Back to Top