1.

H. Akhani , G. Edwards & E. H. Roalson 2007: Diversification of the Old World Salsolae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae): molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast data sets and a revised classification. —  Int. J. Pl. Sci. 168: 931–956. Google Scholar

2.

R. Artelari & O. Georgiou 2003: Biosystematic study of the genus Limonium (Plumbaginaceae) in the Aegean area, Greece III. Limonium on the islands Kithira and Antikithira and the surrounding islets. — Nordic J. Bot. 22: 483–501. Google Scholar

3.

G. Beck 1887: Flora von Südbosnien und der angrenzenden Hercegovina. — Ann. K. K. Naturhist. Hofmus. 2: 142–183. Google Scholar

4.

G. Bosi , P. M. Guarrera , R. Rinaldi & M. Bandini Mazzanti 2009: Ethnobotany of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) in Italy and morfo-biometric analyses of seeds from archaeological sites of Emilia Romagna (Northern Italy). — Pp. 129–139 in: J. P. Morel & A. M. Mercuri (ed.). Plants and culture: seeds of the cultural heritage of Europe. — Bari: Edipuglia. Google Scholar

5.

V. P. Botschantzev 1968: Obzor vidov sekcii Belanthera Iljin roda Salsola L. — Bot. Zhurn. 53: 1440–1450. Google Scholar

6.

R. K. Brummitt 2009: Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants: 60. —  Taxon 58: 280–292. Google Scholar

7.

K. P. Buttler & R. Hand 2008: Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Deutschlands. — Kochia Beih. 1: 1–107. Google Scholar

8.

D. Chaix 1785: Plantae vapincenses sive enumeratio in agro vapincensi observatarum stirpium. — Baux: [the author]. Google Scholar

9.

D. Chaix 1786: Plantae vapincenses, sive Enumeratio Plantarum in agro vapincensi a valle le Valgaudemar, ad amniculum le Buech, prope Segesteronem, sponte nascentium, aut œconomice cicurum. — Pp. 309–382 in: D. Villars , Histoire des plantes de Dauphiné 1. — Grenoble: L'auteur [Reprint of Chaix 1785] Google Scholar

10.

Y. L. Chou , T. C. Huang , Y. L. Zhang , C. T. Li & T. C. Zhao 1955: Xiao Xinganling muben zhiwu [Woody plants of the Xiao Hingan Mountains], — Beijing: Zhongguo linye chubanshe. Google Scholar

11.

R. Cowan , M. J. Ingrouille & M. D. Lledó 1998: The taxonomic treatment of agamosperms in the genus Limonium Mill. (Plumbaginaceae). — Folia Geobot. 33: 353–366. Google Scholar

12.

G. Cristofolini 1991: Taxonomic revision of Cytisus Desf. sect. Tubocytisus DC. (Fabaceae) — Webbia 45: 187–219. Google Scholar

13.

G. M. Cruz Trujillo , O. Rodríguez Delago & W. Wildpret de la Torre 2008: Dichanthium annulatum (Forssk.) Stapf, una gramínea nueva para las Islas Canarias. — Bot. Macaronés. 27: 137–140. Google Scholar

14.

A. Danin , I. Baker & H. G. Baker 1978: Cytogeography and taxonomy of the Portulaca oleracea L. polyploid complex. — Israel J. Bot. 27: 177–211. Google Scholar

15.

A. Danin , G. Domina & F. M. Raimondo 2008: Microspecies of the Portulaca oleracea aggregate found on major Mediterranean islands (Sicily, Cyprus, Crete, Rhodes). — Fl. Medit. 18: 89–108. Google Scholar

16.

A. Danin , M. Marrosu , M. C. Caria & S. Bagella 2011: The status of Portulaca oleracea aggregate in Sardinia (Italy) and a key to its 19 microspecies. — Pl. Biosystems (in press). Google Scholar

17.

A. Danin & J. A. Reyes-Betancort 2006: The status of Portulaca oleracea L. in Tenerife, the Canary Islands. — Lagascalia 26: 71–81. Google Scholar

18.

P. H. Davis (ed.) 1965: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 1. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. Google Scholar

19.

M. Demiri 1983: Flora ekskursioniste e Shqipërisë. — Tiranë: Shtëpia Botuese e Librit Shkollor. Google Scholar

20.

N. Diklić 1972: Chamaecytisus Link. — Pp. 497–515 in: M. Josifovićc (ed.). Flora SR Serbije 4. — Beograd: Srpska Akad. Nauka i Umetnosti. Google Scholar

21.

G. Domina , P. A. Schäfer & A. Danin 2010: Typification and taxonomie status of Portulaca macrantha (Portulacaceae). — Fl. Medit. 20: 187–191. Google Scholar

22.

F. Ehrendorfer 1995: Evolutionary trends and patterns in the Anemoninae. — Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl. 9: 283–293. Google Scholar

23.

F. Ehrendorfer & R. Samuel 2001 : Contributions to a molecular phylogeny and systematics of Anemone and related genera (Ranunculaceae-Anemoninae). — Acta Phytotax. Sin. 39: 293–307. Google Scholar

24.

J. F. Ehrhart 1783: Bestimmung einiger Bäume und Sträucher aus unsern Lustgebüschen. — Gartenkalender 1783: 189—192. Google Scholar

25.

M. Erben 1979: Karyotype differentiation and its consequences in Mediterranean Limonium. — Webbia 34: 409–417. Google Scholar

26.

Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med Plantbase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed [accessed 23.3.2011]. Google Scholar

27.

M. Fischer , K. Oswald & W. Adler (ed.) 2008: Exkursionsflora für Österreich, Liechtenstein und Südtirol, ed. 3. — Linz: Oberösterreichische Landesmuseen. Google Scholar

28.

S. S. Fodor 1974: Flora Zakarpatija. — L'viv: Vidavn. Ob'edinenie Vishcha Shkola. Google Scholar

29.

H. Freitag & E. Özhatay 1997: A new subspecies of Salsola canescens (Chenopodiaceae) from SW Anatolia, Turkey. —  Willdenowia 27: 185–190. Google Scholar

30.

H. Freitag & S. Rilke 1997: Salsola. — Pp. 154–255 in: K. H. Rechinger (ed.), Flora iranica 173. — Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. Google Scholar

31.

P. E. Gibbs 1969: Chamaecytisus Link — Pp. 16–21 in: P. H. Davis (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean islands 3. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. Google Scholar

32.

W. Greuter , H. M. Burdet & G. Long 1984, 1989: MedChecklist 1, 4. — Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Ville de Genève; Berlin: Botanischer Garten & Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

33.

W. Greuter & E. von Raab-Straube 2005: Euro+Med Notulae, 1. —  Willdenowia 35: 223–239. Google Scholar

34.

W. Greuter & E. von Raab-Straube 2009: Euro+Med Notulae, 4. —  Willdenowia 39: 327–333. Google Scholar

35.

A. A. Grossheim 1950: Flora Kavkasa. 4. — Moskva & Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

36.

R. Hand & K. P. Buttler 2006: Taxonomische und nomenklatorische Neuigkeiten zur Flora Deutschlands 1. — Kochia 1: 147–155. Google Scholar

37.

T. Hartig 1842–51: Vollständige Naturgeschichte der forstlichen Culturpflanzen Deutschlands. Heft 1–3 (1842), 4–10 (1843), 11–12 (1851). — Berlin: Förstner. Google Scholar

38.

V. H. Heywood & D. G. Frodin 1968: Chamaecytisus Link. — Pp. 90–93 in: T. G. Tutin , V. H. Heywood , N. A. Burges , D. M. Moore , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (ed.), Flora europaea 2. — Cambridge: Cambridge University. Google Scholar

39.

J. Holub 1986: Comments on the “Med-Checklist 1”. — Preslia 58: 289–306. Google Scholar

40.

M. Horjales , G. Laso & N. Redondo 2009: Dactylis glomerata L. (Poaceae) en la Península Ibérica. — Nova Acta Ci. Compostelana, Biol. 17: 65–85. Google Scholar

41.

E. Hultén & M. Fries 1986: Atlas of North European vascular plants north of the tropic of cancer 1–3. — Königstein: Koeltz. Google Scholar

42.

J. Jalas & J. Suominen (ed.) 1989: Atlas Florae europaeae. Distribution of vascular plants in Europe 8. — Helsinki: Committee for Mapping and the Flora of Europe. Google Scholar

43.

B. Jonsell (ed.) 2000: Flora nordica 1. — Stockholm: Bergius Foundation. Google Scholar

44.

G. Kadereit & H. Freitag 2011: Molecular phylogeny of Camphorosmeae (Camphorosmoideae, Chenopodiaceae): implications for biogeography, evolution of C₄ photosynthesis and taxonomy. —  Taxon 60: 51–78. Google Scholar

45.

G. Kadereit , T. Borsch , K. Weising & H. Freitag 2003: Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C₄ photosynthesis. —  Int. J. Pl. Sci. 164: 959–986. Google Scholar

46.

A. A. Kagalo 1999: Checklist of Fabaceae of the western Ukraine. — Acta Bot. Fenn. 162: 137–140. Google Scholar

47.

K. Koch 1872: Dendrologie. Bäume, Sträucher und Halbsträucher, welche in Mittel- und Nord-Europa im Freien kultivirt werden, kritisch beleuchtet. 2/1, die Mono- und Apetalen, mit Ausnahme der Cupuliferen, enthaltend. — Erlangen: Enke. Google Scholar

48.

V.L. Komarov (ed.) 1936, 1937: Flora SSSR 5, 7. — Moskva & Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

49.

B. Kuzmanov 1976: Chamaecytisus Link. — Pp. 74–119 in: D. Jordanov (ed.): Flora na Narodna Republika Bälgarija 6. — Sofija: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata Akademija na Naukite. Google Scholar

50.

J. Lambinon & L. Kerguélen 1988: Trois combinaisons nomenclaturales nouvelles relatives à la flore corse. — Candollea 43: 405–406. Google Scholar

51.

M. D. Lledó , M. B. Crespo , M. F. Fay & M. W. Chase 2005: Molecular phylogenetics of Limonium and related genera (Plumbaginaceae): biogeographical and systematic implications. —  Amer. J. Bot. 92: 1189–1198. Google Scholar

52.

H. Manitz 1975: Friedrich Ehrhart's botanische Publikationen. — Taxon 24: 469–474. Google Scholar

53.

J. McNeill , F. Barrie , H. M. Burdet , V. Demoulin , D. L. Hawksworth , K. Marhold , D. H. Nicolson , J. Prado , P. C. Silva , J. E. Skog , J. H. Wiersema & N. J. Turland 2006: International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. — Regnum Veg. 146. Google Scholar

54.

K. Micevski 2001: Flora na Republika Makedonija 1(5). — Skopje: Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite. Google Scholar

55.

N. R. Morin & Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.) 1997: Flora of North America north of Mexico 3. — New York: Oxford University. Google Scholar

56.

A. Oprea 2005: Lista critica a plantelor vasculare din România. — Iaşi: Univ. “Alexandru loan Cuza”. Google Scholar

57.

S. Papatsou & D. Phitos 1975: Two new taxa from the eastern Aegean. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 34: 203–204. Google Scholar

58.

P. Perret & H. M. Burdet 1981: 2. Les “Plantae Vapincenses” de Dominique Chaix et les traveaux floristiques de Dominique Villars en Dauphiné. — Pp. 400–408 in H. M. Burdet (ed.), Med-Checklist notulae bibliographicae, 1 et 2. — Candollea 36: 397–408. Google Scholar

59.

D. Pifkó 2009: Schur's Cytisus taxa. — Stud. Bot. Hung. 40: 143–163. Google Scholar

60.

S. Pignatti 1962: Studi sui Limonium, V. Note sulla sistematica delle specie iberiche di Limonium. — Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 6: 293–330. Google Scholar

61.

Z. Pouzar 1982: Otázka správného jména pro olši zelenou. — Cas. Nár. Muz. Praze, Rada Přír. 151: 20. Google Scholar

62.

X. Qosja (ed.) 1992: Flora e Shqiperisë 2. — Tiranë: Akademia e Shkencave e Republikas se Shqipërisë. Google Scholar

63.

C. Ricceri & P. V. Arrigoni 2000: L'aggregato di Portulaca oleracea L. (Portulacaceae) in Italia. — Parlatorea 4: 91–97. Google Scholar

64.

T. B. Ryves , E. J. Clement & M. Foster 1996: Alien Grasses of the British Isles. — London: Botanical Society of the British Isles. Google Scholar

65.

A. Sennikov 2006: Miscellaneous nomenclatural notes (II). — Komarovia 4: 138–154. Google Scholar

66.

V. Täckholm & L. Boulos 1974: Supplementary notes to the Students' Flora of Egypt, Second Edition. — Publ. Cairo Univ. Herb. 5. Google Scholar

67.

A. I. Tolmachev , J. G. Packer & G. C. D. Griffiths (ed.) 2000: Flora of the Russian Arctic. A critical review of the vascular plants occurring in the Arctic region of the former Soviet Union. 3. — Berlin: Cramer. Google Scholar

68.

T. G. Tutin , N. A. Burges , A. O. Chater , J. R. Edmondson , V. H. Heywood , D. M. Moore , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (ed.) 1993: Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. — Cambridge: Cambridge University. Google Scholar

69.

N. N. Tzvelev 1983: Grasses of the Soviet Union 1. — New Delhi: Amerind [Engl, transi, of: Cvelev, N. N. 1976: Zlaki SSSR. — Leningrad]. Google Scholar

70.

N. G. Walsh , C. M. Weiller & I. R. Thompson 2009: Poa. — Pp. 301–338 in: A. Wilson (ed.), Flora of Australia 44A. — Melbourne: Australian Government Publ. Service. Google Scholar

71.

G. P. Yakovlev , A. K. Sytin & Yu. Roskov 1996: Legumes of northern Eurasia. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

72.

S. N. Ziman , F. Ehrendorfer , Y Kadota , C. S. Keener , O. N. Tsarenko , E. Bulakh & B. E. Dutton 2005: A taxonomic revision of Anemone L. section Omalocarpus DC. sensu lato (Ranunculaceae): Part I. — J. Jap. Bot. 80: 282–302. Google Scholar