Translator Disclaimer
9 June 2011 Euro Med Notulae, 5
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This is the fifth of a series of miscellaneous contributions, by various authors, where hitherto unpublished data relevant to the Euro Med (or Sisyphus) Project are presented. This instalment deals with the families Betulaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Leguminosae, Plumbaginaceae, Portulacaceae, Ranunculaceae, Salicaceae and Gramineae, including new country and area records for taxa of Avena, Chamaecytisus (Cytisus), Dichanthium, Eragrostis, Festuca, Holcus, Poa and Portulaca, and the validation of names in the genera Alnus, Anemonastrum, Dactylis, Homalotrichon, Limonium, Salix and Salsola.

See the PDF.

References

1.

H. Akhani , G. Edwards & E. H. Roalson 2007: Diversification of the Old World Salsolae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae): molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast data sets and a revised classification. —  Int. J. Pl. Sci. 168: 931–956. Google Scholar

2.

R. Artelari & O. Georgiou 2003: Biosystematic study of the genus Limonium (Plumbaginaceae) in the Aegean area, Greece III. Limonium on the islands Kithira and Antikithira and the surrounding islets. — Nordic J. Bot. 22: 483–501. Google Scholar

3.

G. Beck 1887: Flora von Südbosnien und der angrenzenden Hercegovina. — Ann. K. K. Naturhist. Hofmus. 2: 142–183. Google Scholar

4.

G. Bosi , P. M. Guarrera , R. Rinaldi & M. Bandini Mazzanti 2009: Ethnobotany of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) in Italy and morfo-biometric analyses of seeds from archaeological sites of Emilia Romagna (Northern Italy). — Pp. 129–139 in: J. P. Morel & A. M. Mercuri (ed.). Plants and culture: seeds of the cultural heritage of Europe. — Bari: Edipuglia. Google Scholar

5.

V. P. Botschantzev 1968: Obzor vidov sekcii Belanthera Iljin roda Salsola L. — Bot. Zhurn. 53: 1440–1450. Google Scholar

6.

R. K. Brummitt 2009: Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants: 60. —  Taxon 58: 280–292. Google Scholar

7.

K. P. Buttler & R. Hand 2008: Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Deutschlands. — Kochia Beih. 1: 1–107. Google Scholar

8.

D. Chaix 1785: Plantae vapincenses sive enumeratio in agro vapincensi observatarum stirpium. — Baux: [the author]. Google Scholar

9.

D. Chaix 1786: Plantae vapincenses, sive Enumeratio Plantarum in agro vapincensi a valle le Valgaudemar, ad amniculum le Buech, prope Segesteronem, sponte nascentium, aut œconomice cicurum. — Pp. 309–382 in: D. Villars , Histoire des plantes de Dauphiné 1. — Grenoble: L'auteur [Reprint of Chaix 1785] Google Scholar

10.

Y. L. Chou , T. C. Huang , Y. L. Zhang , C. T. Li & T. C. Zhao 1955: Xiao Xinganling muben zhiwu [Woody plants of the Xiao Hingan Mountains], — Beijing: Zhongguo linye chubanshe. Google Scholar

11.

R. Cowan , M. J. Ingrouille & M. D. Lledó 1998: The taxonomic treatment of agamosperms in the genus Limonium Mill. (Plumbaginaceae). — Folia Geobot. 33: 353–366. Google Scholar

12.

G. Cristofolini 1991: Taxonomic revision of Cytisus Desf. sect. Tubocytisus DC. (Fabaceae) — Webbia 45: 187–219. Google Scholar

13.

G. M. Cruz Trujillo , O. Rodríguez Delago & W. Wildpret de la Torre 2008: Dichanthium annulatum (Forssk.) Stapf, una gramínea nueva para las Islas Canarias. — Bot. Macaronés. 27: 137–140. Google Scholar

14.

A. Danin , I. Baker & H. G. Baker 1978: Cytogeography and taxonomy of the Portulaca oleracea L. polyploid complex. — Israel J. Bot. 27: 177–211. Google Scholar

15.

A. Danin , G. Domina & F. M. Raimondo 2008: Microspecies of the Portulaca oleracea aggregate found on major Mediterranean islands (Sicily, Cyprus, Crete, Rhodes). — Fl. Medit. 18: 89–108. Google Scholar

16.

A. Danin , M. Marrosu , M. C. Caria & S. Bagella 2011: The status of Portulaca oleracea aggregate in Sardinia (Italy) and a key to its 19 microspecies. — Pl. Biosystems (in press). Google Scholar

17.

A. Danin & J. A. Reyes-Betancort 2006: The status of Portulaca oleracea L. in Tenerife, the Canary Islands. — Lagascalia 26: 71–81. Google Scholar

18.

P. H. Davis (ed.) 1965: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 1. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. Google Scholar

19.

M. Demiri 1983: Flora ekskursioniste e Shqipërisë. — Tiranë: Shtëpia Botuese e Librit Shkollor. Google Scholar

20.

N. Diklić 1972: Chamaecytisus Link. — Pp. 497–515 in: M. Josifovićc (ed.). Flora SR Serbije 4. — Beograd: Srpska Akad. Nauka i Umetnosti. Google Scholar

21.

G. Domina , P. A. Schäfer & A. Danin 2010: Typification and taxonomie status of Portulaca macrantha (Portulacaceae). — Fl. Medit. 20: 187–191. Google Scholar

22.

F. Ehrendorfer 1995: Evolutionary trends and patterns in the Anemoninae. — Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl. 9: 283–293. Google Scholar

23.

F. Ehrendorfer & R. Samuel 2001 : Contributions to a molecular phylogeny and systematics of Anemone and related genera (Ranunculaceae-Anemoninae). — Acta Phytotax. Sin. 39: 293–307. Google Scholar

24.

J. F. Ehrhart 1783: Bestimmung einiger Bäume und Sträucher aus unsern Lustgebüschen. — Gartenkalender 1783: 189—192. Google Scholar

25.

M. Erben 1979: Karyotype differentiation and its consequences in Mediterranean Limonium. — Webbia 34: 409–417. Google Scholar

26.

Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med Plantbase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed [accessed 23.3.2011]. Google Scholar

27.

M. Fischer , K. Oswald & W. Adler (ed.) 2008: Exkursionsflora für Österreich, Liechtenstein und Südtirol, ed. 3. — Linz: Oberösterreichische Landesmuseen. Google Scholar

28.

S. S. Fodor 1974: Flora Zakarpatija. — L'viv: Vidavn. Ob'edinenie Vishcha Shkola. Google Scholar

29.

H. Freitag & E. Özhatay 1997: A new subspecies of Salsola canescens (Chenopodiaceae) from SW Anatolia, Turkey. —  Willdenowia 27: 185–190. Google Scholar

30.

H. Freitag & S. Rilke 1997: Salsola. — Pp. 154–255 in: K. H. Rechinger (ed.), Flora iranica 173. — Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. Google Scholar

31.

P. E. Gibbs 1969: Chamaecytisus Link — Pp. 16–21 in: P. H. Davis (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean islands 3. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. Google Scholar

32.

W. Greuter , H. M. Burdet & G. Long 1984, 1989: MedChecklist 1, 4. — Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Ville de Genève; Berlin: Botanischer Garten & Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

33.

W. Greuter & E. von Raab-Straube 2005: Euro+Med Notulae, 1. —  Willdenowia 35: 223–239. Google Scholar

34.

W. Greuter & E. von Raab-Straube 2009: Euro+Med Notulae, 4. —  Willdenowia 39: 327–333. Google Scholar

35.

A. A. Grossheim 1950: Flora Kavkasa. 4. — Moskva & Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

36.

R. Hand & K. P. Buttler 2006: Taxonomische und nomenklatorische Neuigkeiten zur Flora Deutschlands 1. — Kochia 1: 147–155. Google Scholar

37.

T. Hartig 1842–51: Vollständige Naturgeschichte der forstlichen Culturpflanzen Deutschlands. Heft 1–3 (1842), 4–10 (1843), 11–12 (1851). — Berlin: Förstner. Google Scholar

38.

V. H. Heywood & D. G. Frodin 1968: Chamaecytisus Link. — Pp. 90–93 in: T. G. Tutin , V. H. Heywood , N. A. Burges , D. M. Moore , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (ed.), Flora europaea 2. — Cambridge: Cambridge University. Google Scholar

39.

J. Holub 1986: Comments on the “Med-Checklist 1”. — Preslia 58: 289–306. Google Scholar

40.

M. Horjales , G. Laso & N. Redondo 2009: Dactylis glomerata L. (Poaceae) en la Península Ibérica. — Nova Acta Ci. Compostelana, Biol. 17: 65–85. Google Scholar

41.

E. Hultén & M. Fries 1986: Atlas of North European vascular plants north of the tropic of cancer 1–3. — Königstein: Koeltz. Google Scholar

42.

J. Jalas & J. Suominen (ed.) 1989: Atlas Florae europaeae. Distribution of vascular plants in Europe 8. — Helsinki: Committee for Mapping and the Flora of Europe. Google Scholar

43.

B. Jonsell (ed.) 2000: Flora nordica 1. — Stockholm: Bergius Foundation. Google Scholar

44.

G. Kadereit & H. Freitag 2011: Molecular phylogeny of Camphorosmeae (Camphorosmoideae, Chenopodiaceae): implications for biogeography, evolution of C4 photosynthesis and taxonomy. —  Taxon 60: 51–78. Google Scholar

45.

G. Kadereit , T. Borsch , K. Weising & H. Freitag 2003: Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. —  Int. J. Pl. Sci. 164: 959–986. Google Scholar

46.

A. A. Kagalo 1999: Checklist of Fabaceae of the western Ukraine. — Acta Bot. Fenn. 162: 137–140. Google Scholar

47.

K. Koch 1872: Dendrologie. Bäume, Sträucher und Halbsträucher, welche in Mittel- und Nord-Europa im Freien kultivirt werden, kritisch beleuchtet. 2/1, die Mono- und Apetalen, mit Ausnahme der Cupuliferen, enthaltend. — Erlangen: Enke. Google Scholar

48.

V.L. Komarov (ed.) 1936, 1937: Flora SSSR 5, 7. — Moskva & Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

49.

B. Kuzmanov 1976: Chamaecytisus Link. — Pp. 74–119 in: D. Jordanov (ed.): Flora na Narodna Republika Bälgarija 6. — Sofija: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata Akademija na Naukite. Google Scholar

50.

J. Lambinon & L. Kerguélen 1988: Trois combinaisons nomenclaturales nouvelles relatives à la flore corse. — Candollea 43: 405–406. Google Scholar

51.

M. D. Lledó , M. B. Crespo , M. F. Fay & M. W. Chase 2005: Molecular phylogenetics of Limonium and related genera (Plumbaginaceae): biogeographical and systematic implications. —  Amer. J. Bot. 92: 1189–1198. Google Scholar

52.

H. Manitz 1975: Friedrich Ehrhart's botanische Publikationen. — Taxon 24: 469–474. Google Scholar

53.

J. McNeill , F. Barrie , H. M. Burdet , V. Demoulin , D. L. Hawksworth , K. Marhold , D. H. Nicolson , J. Prado , P. C. Silva , J. E. Skog , J. H. Wiersema & N. J. Turland 2006: International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. — Regnum Veg. 146. Google Scholar

54.

K. Micevski 2001: Flora na Republika Makedonija 1(5). — Skopje: Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite. Google Scholar

55.

N. R. Morin & Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.) 1997: Flora of North America north of Mexico 3. — New York: Oxford University. Google Scholar

56.

A. Oprea 2005: Lista critica a plantelor vasculare din România. — Iaşi: Univ. “Alexandru loan Cuza”. Google Scholar

57.

S. Papatsou & D. Phitos 1975: Two new taxa from the eastern Aegean. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 34: 203–204. Google Scholar

58.

P. Perret & H. M. Burdet 1981: 2. Les “Plantae Vapincenses” de Dominique Chaix et les traveaux floristiques de Dominique Villars en Dauphiné. — Pp. 400–408 in H. M. Burdet (ed.), Med-Checklist notulae bibliographicae, 1 et 2. — Candollea 36: 397–408. Google Scholar

59.

D. Pifkó 2009: Schur's Cytisus taxa. — Stud. Bot. Hung. 40: 143–163. Google Scholar

60.

S. Pignatti 1962: Studi sui Limonium, V. Note sulla sistematica delle specie iberiche di Limonium. — Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 6: 293–330. Google Scholar

61.

Z. Pouzar 1982: Otázka správného jména pro olši zelenou. — Cas. Nár. Muz. Praze, Rada Přír. 151: 20. Google Scholar

62.

X. Qosja (ed.) 1992: Flora e Shqiperisë 2. — Tiranë: Akademia e Shkencave e Republikas se Shqipërisë. Google Scholar

63.

C. Ricceri & P. V. Arrigoni 2000: L'aggregato di Portulaca oleracea L. (Portulacaceae) in Italia. — Parlatorea 4: 91–97. Google Scholar

64.

T. B. Ryves , E. J. Clement & M. Foster 1996: Alien Grasses of the British Isles. — London: Botanical Society of the British Isles. Google Scholar

65.

A. Sennikov 2006: Miscellaneous nomenclatural notes (II). — Komarovia 4: 138–154. Google Scholar

66.

V. Täckholm & L. Boulos 1974: Supplementary notes to the Students' Flora of Egypt, Second Edition. — Publ. Cairo Univ. Herb. 5. Google Scholar

67.

A. I. Tolmachev , J. G. Packer & G. C. D. Griffiths (ed.) 2000: Flora of the Russian Arctic. A critical review of the vascular plants occurring in the Arctic region of the former Soviet Union. 3. — Berlin: Cramer. Google Scholar

68.

T. G. Tutin , N. A. Burges , A. O. Chater , J. R. Edmondson , V. H. Heywood , D. M. Moore , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (ed.) 1993: Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. — Cambridge: Cambridge University. Google Scholar

69.

N. N. Tzvelev 1983: Grasses of the Soviet Union 1. — New Delhi: Amerind [Engl, transi, of: Cvelev, N. N. 1976: Zlaki SSSR. — Leningrad]. Google Scholar

70.

N. G. Walsh , C. M. Weiller & I. R. Thompson 2009: Poa. — Pp. 301–338 in: A. Wilson (ed.), Flora of Australia 44A. — Melbourne: Australian Government Publ. Service. Google Scholar

71.

G. P. Yakovlev , A. K. Sytin & Yu. Roskov 1996: Legumes of northern Eurasia. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

72.

S. N. Ziman , F. Ehrendorfer , Y Kadota , C. S. Keener , O. N. Tsarenko , E. Bulakh & B. E. Dutton 2005: A taxonomic revision of Anemone L. section Omalocarpus DC. sensu lato (Ranunculaceae): Part I. — J. Jap. Bot. 80: 282–302. Google Scholar
© 2011 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.
Werner Greuter and Eckhard Von Raab-Straube "Euro Med Notulae, 5," Willdenowia 41(1), 129-138, (9 June 2011). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.41.41117
Published: 9 June 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top