Translator Disclaimer
17 June 2015 Tamarix minoa (Tamaricaceae), a new species from the island of Crete (Greece) based on morphological and plastid molecular sequence data
Author Affiliations +

Tamarix minoa is described from material collected on the S Aegean island of Crete (Kriti), Greece. A morphological comparison with the species considered to be closest, T. africana and T. hampeana, is provided. An original illustration showing the main morphological characters of the new species is also given, as are photographs of the new species in its habitat. The isolated phylogenetic position of T. minoa is shown to be strongly supported by plastid molecular sequence data (trnS-trnG, trnQ-rps16 and ndhF-rpl32), thus warranting its recognition at specific rank.


The recent revision of the genus Tamarix in Crete (Villar & al. 2014) confirmed the presence of at least four species on that island: T. hampeana Boiss. & Heldr., T nilotica (Ehrenb.) Bunge, T. parviflora DC. and T. smyrnensis Bunge. Among these, the record of T. hampeana was considered to be controversial and its identity was left in need of further clarification. It was difficult to obtain a precise identification of the specimens initially assigned to T. hampeana (Turland 2010; Villar & al. 2014). In fact, the different taxonomic works consulted (Boissier 1849, 1867; Bunge 1852; Baum 1968, 1978) did not lead to satisfactory results in respect to the morphology of the studied specimens or their identity with T. hampeana or any other described taxa. The specimen MO6207620 (herbarium codes according to Thiers 2015+) was first identified as T. africana Poir. However, on B. Baum's advice, it was finally identified and reported as T. hampeana (Turland 2010; Villar & al. 2014). On the other hand, the specimens ABH54194, ABH54195 and ABH54196 (see Appendix) were first identified as T. tetragyna Ehrenb., due to the high proportion of tetramerous and pentamerous flowers present in the late-season racemes. Nevertheless, after examining several herbarium specimens of T. tetragyna, its morphological features showed clear differences from the Cretan specimens and, therefore, that identification was proven to be clearly erroneous. These specimens were finally assigned, with reservations, to T. hampeana (Villar & al. 2014).

On account of the doubts held about the taxonomic identity of these specimens from Crete, a deeper morphological study was conducted. In addition, a preliminary phylogeny, based on three plastid DNA regions (intergenic spacers trnS-trnG, ndhF-rpl32 and trnQ-rps16), was conducted to identify which of the existing taxa could be genetically closest to the controversial Cretan samples.

The combination of morphological and molecular evidence allows the description of a new species, Tamarix minoa, apparently endemic to Crete. The morphological features of the new species, as well as its taxonomic relationships, are described below.

Material and methods

The material on which this study is focused was collected at Georgioupoli, on the N coast of W Crete. The precise locations for all samples are not more than 1 km apart, so they can be considered to belong to a single population. The specimens collected by Turland and Bareka are kept at UPA, with duplicates at B and MO; the ones collected by Villar, Alonso and Vicente are conserved at ABH.

In order to clarify the morphological identity of the Cretan specimens, over 120 herbarium specimens of the morphologically closest taxa (Tamarix africana and T. hampeana) were studied, including type material (Villar & al. 2015) kept at G, K, MA and P. Moreover, different European and American herbaria (ABH, B, G, MO, MPU, P, PR, PRC, VAL and W) (Thiers 2015+) were visited in order to obtain a wider view of the morphological characterization of the whole genus. In addition, field collections were made around the W Mediterranean region, where T. africana is mainly distributed, as well as around the coasts of continental Greece, where T. hampeana is widespread. Those field collections are kept at ABH. Detailed observations and morphological measurements of vegetative and flower parameters were undertaken according to Villar & al. (2012). The main floras and taxonomic works dealing with Tamarix in the Mediterranean region were consulted (Candolle 1828; Boissier 1849, 1867; Bunge 1852; Baum 1966, 1968, 1978).

A total of 23 samples of Tamarix, belonging to 10 species from 11 countries, were used for the molecular analyses (Table 1). Reaumuria alternifolia (Labill.) Britten, Myricaria bracteata Royle and Myrtama elegans (Royle) Ovcz. & Kinzik., all belonging to Tamaricaceae, were also included as the outgroup. Regarding Tamarix samples, in addition to three of the Cretan samples, we included the vaginate-leaved T. aphylla (L.) H. Karst, and T. usneoides E. Mey. ex Bunge; the generic type species T. gallica L.; species occurring geographically nearby (T. dalmatica B. R. Baum and T. parviflora); and those species once thought to match with the Cretan samples (Villar & al. 2014): T. africana, T. hampeana and T. tetragyna (along with its close relative T. boveana Bunge). All the studied samples are kept at the herbaria ABH or MO, with the exception of the outgroup samples corresponding to R. alternifolia and M. bracteata, which belong to John F. Gaskin, kept at the USDA ARS at Sidney (MT, U.S.A.), soon to be deposited at MO (Table 1).

Genomic DNA was extracted from silica-gel-dried leaf material (Chase & Hill 1991), following a modified 2xCTAB method (Doyle & Doyle 1987). Total DNA is kept at the ABH-DNA bank. The species-level phylogeny is based on three plastid intergenic spacers (trnS-trnG, trnQ-rps16 and ndhF-rpl32), which were amplified using the primers described in Hamilton (1999) and Shaw & al. (2007). The amplifications were performed in a reaction volume of 25 µl containing 22.5 µl AB Gene 1.1× Master Mix 2.5 mM MgCl2 (Thermo Scientific Waltham, MA, U.S.A.), 0.5 µl of 0.4% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.5 µl of each primer (10 pmol/µl) and 1 µl of template DNA. The PCR programme used for all three regions was an initial denaturation of 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C (1 min 15 sec), 55°C (1 min 30 sec) and 72°C (2 min); and a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were purified using Ultraclean® PCR Clean-Up Kit (MOBIO, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) micro-columns, following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Both strands were sequenced with the same primers for each region and for all samples at Macrogen Inc. Korea (

Complementary strands were assembled using Sequencher 4.1 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.). The three plastid regions were aligned automatically by ClustalW, conducted in MEGA 5.05 (Tamura & al. 2011). Minor manual corrections were made to obtain the final alignments, and the three regions were joined in a single matrix. Maximum parsimony analyses (MP) and Bayesian analyses were performed on the plastid dataset.

MP analyses were conducted in PAUP v.4.0b10 (Swofford 2002), using heuristic search options. Searches included 1000 random addition replicates and tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, with MULTREES in effect (keeping multiple most-parsimonious trees). All characters were treated as having equal weight. The shortest trees held in the heuristic search were used as initial trees for a final heuristic analysis, with the previously commented options. MP support was assessed by 1000 bootstrap replicates, TBR branch swapping, simple addition sequence and MULTREES on, keeping 10 trees per replicate (Salamin & al. 2003). For the MP analyses, the consistency index (CI) and retention index (RI) were calculated excluding uninformative characters. Clades showing bootstrap (BS) values between 50%–74 % were considered as weakly supported, 75%–89% moderately supported and 90%–100% strongly supported.

A Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis was conducted using MrBayes v.3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001; Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). The most accurate evolutionary model required for Bayesian estimation was selected using the AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) (Posada & Crandall 1998; Posada & Buckley 2004), conducted in JMODELTEST 2.1.5 (Darriba & al. 2012). Two simultaneous and independent analyses were performed. For each analysis, the Markov and Monte Carlo chains were run for 2 × 106 generations and sampled every 100 generations. The chains became stationary and the average standard deviation of the split frequencies stabilized in 250 000 generations. Thus the first 250 trees were excluded (“burn-in”) and the remaining trees were used to compile a posterior probability (PP) distribution using a 50% majority-rule consensus.

Table 1.

Materials used in the molecular analysis.


Results and Discussion

Tamarix minoa J. L. Villar, Turland, Juan, Gaskin, M. A. Alonso & M. B. Crespo, sp. nov.Fig. 1 & 2.

Holotype: Greece, Crete, Nomos Chanion, Eparchia Apokoronou, Georgioupoli beach, by river mouth at E edge of village, 35°21′34.3″N, 24°15′59.6″E, 0 m, sandy river bank on beach with springs emerging beneath the Tamarix trees, 28 Mar 2009, N. J. Turland 1778 & P. Bareka (UPA-Herb. Phitos & Kamari; isotypes: B, MO6207620).

Tamarix hampeana sensu Turland in Willdenowia 40: 198. 2010, non Boiss. & Heldr. 1849.

Diagnosis — Species distincta primo aspectu ad Tamaricem africanam Poir. aemulans et cum T. hampeana Boiss. & Heldr. plerumque confusa, sed eis singulari characterum combinatio valde diversa et multo differt; racemis vernalis e ramorum vetustiorum productis aliquando junioribus hornotinis ramulis alternantibus; bracteis lineari-oblongis, concavis, subpatulis, calyces paulo superantibus; floribus plerumque pentameris, sed ad postremum tempum florendi cum aliis tetrameris floribus simul commixtis; sepalis acutis, marginibus denticulatis; petalis oblongo-obovatis vel obovatis, concavis vel leviter carinatis; antheris mucronatis.

DescriptionShrubs or low shrubby trees, up to 5 m tall. Bark reddish brown to dark burgundy. Leaves green to glaucous green, lanceolate, (1-)1.5-2.5(-3.5) mm long, surface slightly papillose, bearing salt glands, more evident and abundant in older leaves, base narrow, slightly decurrent, broader and auriculate in leaves remaining from previous year, apex acuminate, slightly incurved. Racemes loosely arranged on previous year's branchlets, sometimes alternating with new-leaved twigs (Fig. 2B), 2.5-4.5(-6) cm long, 6–7.5 mm wide. Peduncle 3–5 mm long, with 4–8 scarious bracts grouped at base, sometimes showing 2–3 mm of naked rachis before first floral bract; rachis lacking papillae on all studied specimens. Bracts patent, yellowish brown, linear-oblong, narrowing at apex, concave, (2-)2.5-3.5(-4.5) mm long, usually slightly surpassing calyx, sometimes not reaching it, base narrow, slightly decurrent, sometimes showing 2 small auricles, margin sparsely papillose-ciliate, apex obtuse to acute, slightly incurved. Pedicels 0.5–0.75 mm long, always shorter than sepals. Calyx of 5 sepals (sometimes 4, very rarely 6)*. Sepals green, ovate-triangular, 1.5–2 mm long, 1–1.2 mm wide, 2 outer ones slightly larger than 3 inner ones, margin broadly membranous, markedly denticulate, apex acute; pentamerous calyx sepals almost alike; tetramerous* calyx outer sepals sometimes with a marked central nerve and apex apiculate, inner sepals evidently smaller and apex obtuse. Corolla of 5 petals (sometimes 4, very rarely 6)*. Petals deciduous at fruit maturity, white, oblong-obovate to obovate, concave to keeled, recurved at late anthesis, 2.8–3.2 mm long, 1–1.5 mm wide, margin sometimes irregular, base sometimes cuneate, not unguiculate. Staminal disk dark brown, 5-lobed (rarely 4-lobed, exceptionally 6-lobed)*; lobes antesepalous, broadly ovate, apex somewhat progressively narrowed into filaments; filaments white, 1.5–2 mm long; anthers pale yellow to light pink, 0.8–1 mm long, 0.5–0.6 mm wide, apex mucronate. Gynoecium of 3 styles and 3 carpels, (rarely 4)*; styles nearly 0.6 mm long.

*More common in late-season racemes.

Phenology — Flowering mainly in March and April, though some late-season racemes may extend the flowering period until the end of May.

Distribution and biogeography—At present, Tamarix minoa is known only from the type locality at Georgioupoli on the N coast of W Crete in the S Aegean region, Greece. Further exploration in the field and examination of herbarium material are needed to clarify if its distribution is confined to Crete or if it extends to other territories. According to Rivas-Martínez & al. (2004), the type locality of T. minoa is located in the Cretan Subprovince, which belongs to the Graeco-Aegean Province, Eastern Mediterranean Subregion and Mediterranean Region. The biogeographical unit Cretan Subprovince matches the “Cretan area” (“Cr”) of Flora europaea (Tutin & al. 1964–1980) and the Euro+Med PlantBase (Euro+Med 2006+) as well as the floristic region “Kriti+Karpathos” (“KK”) of Flora hellenica (Strid & Tan 1997, 2002) and the recent checklist of Greek vascular plants (Dimopoulos & al. 2013).

Ecology — Growing on sandy river banks close to the sea, with springs of percolating (fresh or brackish?) groundwater emerging beneath the Tamarix trees, exposed to inundation by seawater during storms (Fig. 2A).

Etymology — The epithet minoa makes reference to the Minoan civilization, which existed in Crete in the Bronze Age between 3500–2500 BCE and c. 1100 BCE. The term “Minoan” itself is derived from Minos (Mívω;ς;), a mythical king of Crete.

Fig. 1.

Tamarix minoa—A: young branchlet with leaves; B: portion of branchlet with bracts and flower (petals removed); C: bracts, adaxial (left) and abaxial (right) surfaces; D: flower, basal view, showing pedicel and calyx; E: sepals, abaxial surface, outer sepal (left), inner sepal (right); F: petals, adaxial surface; G: staminal disk, apical view with filaments and anthers; H: anthers, lateral views, with distal part of filament (left), with apex at bottom (right); I: gynoecium, lateral view. — Drawn by María García Rivas from the isotype MO6207620.


Fig. 2.

Tamarix minoa — A: tree growing on sandy ground beside river (left), springs emerging beneath tree, sea in distance; B: flowering branchlets. — Type locality, 28 Mar 2009, photographs by N. J. Turland.


Fig. 3.

One of the six most parsimonious trees obtained (774 steps, CI 0.935, RI 0.916). Branch lengths for parsimony analysis are shown above branches. Bootstrap values (BS) > 50% and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) > 0.90 are shown below branches (BS/PP). The outer vertical bars represent the outgroup and the two first split clades in Tamarix. The inner vertical bars represent the sections accepted by Baum (1978).


Remarks — According to our observations, Tamarix minoa is mostly a pentamerous-flowered species, with 5 sepals, 5 petals, 5 stamens and 3 styles. A few rare flowers, though, can be found to be tetramerous or hexamerous in some of the floral whorls, more frequently on late flowering racemes. Often tetramery or hexamery does not affect all whorls at the same time. Most of the examined flowers with a tetramerous calyx had a pentamerous staminal disk. Most of the hexamerous staminal disks were found in pentamerous flowers in relation to sepals and petals. In a few cases, tetramery of sepals was related to hexamery of petals (or vice-versa). No special pattern was found in the occurrence of a 4-styled/-valved gynoecium.

Additional specimens seen (paratypes) — Greece, Crete, Chania, Georgioupoli, river mouth, 30S KV 508171 [35°22′00″N, 24°15′28″E], 12 Jul 2009, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T2CR (ABH54194); ibid., 30S KV 512172 [35°22′04″N, 24°15′42″E], 12 Jul 2009, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T3CR (ABH54196); Georgioupoli, 30S KV 516163 [35°21′34″N, 24°15′59″E], 12 Jul 2009, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T4CR (ABH54195).

Molecular results and phylogenetic relations

The aligned and combined plastid dataset resulted in a 3105-base-pair (bp) matrix. The trnS-trnG region contributed 989 bp, trnQ-rps16 1147 bp and ndhF-rpl32 969 bp. Among the total number of nucleotides, 296 (9.53 %) were potentially parsimony-informative. Both Bayesian and MP analyses yielded trees with the same topology. One of the six most parsimonious trees, obtained with 774 steps (CI of 0.935; RI of 0.916), is shown in Fig. 3.

According to our data (Fig. 3), the monophyly of Tamarix was strongly supported (BS 100%, PP 1.00), and two highly supported clades were fully resolved, corresponding to two different groups here named the T. aphylla clade (BS 100%, PP 1.00) and the T. gallica clade (BS 97 %, PP 0.98). Within the T. gallica clade, T. minoa formed an independent and strongly supported clade (BS 100%, PP 1.00). Its phylogenetic position is well resolved, being a sister group of a large clade (BS 93%, PP 1.00) that includes T. hampeana (BS 76%, PP 0.99), T. parvifiora (BS 86%, PP 1.00) and a third clade formed by T. boveana, T. gallica and T. tetragyna (BS 61%, PP 0.97). The phylogenetic relationships within this third clade are not adequately resolved. Consequently the phylogenetic position of these three species appeared collapsed. Finally, T. africana and T. dalmatica are placed in the outermost positions of this T. gallica clade, as independent branches (BS 100%, PP 1.00, for both taxa).

The current work is not intended to offer a complete phylogeny of the genus Tamarix, since many species were not sequenced for this study and, specifically, no specimens characterized by amplexicaul leaves (e.g. T. passerinoides Delile ex Desv., T. pycnocarpa DC.) were included. Further phylogenetic studies are needed in order to obtain a better overview of the whole genus, including a larger number of samples and species. Nonetheless, and as Gaskin & Schaal (2003) already pointed out, the sections of Tamarix accepted by Baum (1978) do not correspond to monophyletic groups in this preliminary molecular study. In Fig. 3, T. gallica (T. sect. Tamarix, T. ser. Gallicae B. R. Baum) is included in a large group of species belonging to T. sect. Oligadenia (Ehrenb.) B. R. Baum, and separated from T. aphylla and T. usneoides (T. sect. Tamarix, T. ser. Vaginantes (Bunge) Bunge). Moreover, T. parviflora (T. sect. Oligadenia, T. ser. Arbusculae B. R. Baum) shares the same clade with T. tetragyna and T. boveana (T. sect. Oligadenia, T. ser. Anisandrae Bunge), as well as with T. gallica. Tamarix africana, the closest species morphologically to T. minoa, is included in T. sect. Oligadenia, T. ser. Anisandrae. These results suggest that a reanalysis of sections and series should be undertaken. Consequently, we prefer not to classify the new species T. minoa in any of the existing sections.

Morphological comparisons

Despite the taxonomic complexity of the genus, and the diffuse borders between similar species, we can highlight some morphological features to separate Tamarix minoa from the morphologically close T. africana, as well as from its previous identification of T. hampeana (Table 2).

Leaves — Leaves are similar between Tamarix minoa and T. africana, though those of T. africana tend to show a broader auriculate base. In both species the longer leaves rarely reach 3.5 mm. The leaves of T. hampeana are narrower, and it is common to find some longer ones (4–7 mm) at the base of the first young twigs of the year.

RacemesTamarix hampeana racemes are among the larger ones in the genus (usually 4-10 cm long × 7-12 mm wide), some reaching up to 16 cm long × 14 mm wide. The racemes of T. minoa and T. africana, are smaller (usually less than 5 cm long × 8 mm wide), although the smallest T. hampeana racemes can overlap in size with T. africana and T. minoa. However, those of T. minoa show the peculiarity of frequently alternating with new leafy twigs.

Bracts — The bract size of the three species falls into a similar range. However, the bracts of Tamarix minoa are patent, linear-oblong, only narrowing at the apex, with a narrow slightly decurrent base sometimes with two small auricles. On the other hand, the bracts of T. africana are triangular-oblong, always narrowing progressively toward the apex, with a narrow decurrent base sometimes calcarate with two small auricles that can even be slightly decurrent. The bracts of T. hampeana can be ovate-oblong, oblong or narrowly triangular; they are so variable that they are not very reliable for comparison with the other two species.

Pedicels — The pedicels of Tamarix hampeana (usually 1–4 mm long) are frequently longer than the sepals and significantly larger than those of T. africana and T. minoa (in both species subsessile to 0.75 mm long).

CalyxTamarix africana and T. minoa show essentially a pentamerous calyx, although both species can show exceptions. Tetramerous calyces are more common in T. minoa than in T. africana. Tamarix hampeana shows flowers with normally 4 or 5 sepals, but sometimes 6 or 7 or even 8 or 9. This variability makes it difficult to identify T. hampeana as tetramerous or pentamerous. The sepals of T. minoa look similar, the two outer ones are slightly larger than the three inner ones, all are clearly denticulate at the margin and most are acute at the apex. The two outer sepals of T. africana tend to be narrower and usually show a marked central nerve, and all sepals usually have a subentire margin and obtuse apex. The two outer sepals of T. hampeana tend to be narrower and sometimes show a marked central nerve, and all sepals have a subentire margin and acute to obtuse apex.

CorollaTamarix africana and T. minoa are essentially pentamerous, with rare exceptions. In T. hampeana, the number of petals is as variable as the number of sepals (4-6(-9)). The petals of T. hampeana tend to be ellipticoblong, whereas those of T. minoa are oblong-obovate to obovate and concave to keeled, and those of T. africana tend to be broadly ovate and flat (in the typical variety) to oblong-unguiculate. In a single flower, for all three species, all petals are the same size.

Staminal disk — The configuration of the disk is very similar in Tamarix minoa and T. africana, both showing disks with the filaments rising progressively from the apex of disk lobes. They are also quite stable in showing 5 stamens, rarely 6, exceptionally 7 or 8 (Villar & al. 2012). On the other hand, the filaments of T. hampeana rise abruptly from the apex of the disk lobes. Moreover, T. hampeana shows an extremely high variability in the staminal disk features: disks with 4 or 5 staminal filaments are not always easy to find, whereas disks with 6-8(-10) well-developed stamens are common.

Anthers — Only the anthers of Tamarix minoa are clearly mucronate. Those of T. africana and T. hampeana are not, although submucronate anthers can sometimes be found.

Table 2.

Some key morphological features for distinguishing among Tamarix minoa and the related T. africana and T. hampeana.


According to the molecular and morphological results obtained, we can conclude that Tamarix minoa is indeed an independent species well separated from any other taxa of Tamarix. The closest species with respect to morphology is T. africana. However, T. minoa can be separated from T. africana by the linear-oblong concave bracts, acute and denticulate sepals, concave-keeled petals and apiculate anthers. Our phylogenetic results have pointed out the well-supported, isolated position of the studied samples, clearly separated from the morphological close taxa T. africana and T. hampeana, as well as from geographically close taxa such as T. dalmatica and T. parviflora. Regarding morphology, the correct identification of Tamarix collections is known as a troublesome matter, and T. africana is one of the most widely distributed and morphologically variable species in the Mediterranean region. Taking these points into consideration, we would recommend being careful with future records of apparent T. minoa from outside the Aegean region, in order to avoid mistaken identifications, as happened with T. dalmatica in the Iberian Peninsula (Villar & al. 2012).


We warmly thank María García Rivas for drawing the illustration (Fig. 1); the curators and personnel of all the herbaria mentioned in the text, especially James Solomon (MO) for the loan of the isotype specimen conserved there; Kim Mann for her kindness during the lab work carried out in Sidney, MT, U.S.A.; Fernando Martínez Flores for his valuable comments and Elena Martínez for her help with the field work. One of us (N. Turland) thanks the National Geographic Society for supporting the research project “Human recreation versus plant diversity on maritime sands in Crete” (NGS grant no. 8573-08), during which the type gathering of Tamarix minoa was made, and Pepy Bareka (ACA) for participating in the field work. The FPU programme (M° de Educación, Spain), the I+D+I project CGL2008-05056 (M° de Educación y Ciencia, Spanish Government), the project OAPN 354-2011 (M° de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Spanish Government) and complementary supporting funds ACIE10-01, ACIE11-05 and ACIE 13-08 (University of Alicante, Spain) made this research possible.


  1. B. Baum 1966: Monographic revision of the genus Tamarix. Final research report for the USDA. — Jerusalem: Department of Botany, Hebrew University. Google Scholar

  2. B. Baum 1968: Tamarix L. — Pp. 292–294 in: T. G. Tutin , V. H. Heywood , N. A. Burges , D. M. Moore , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (ed.), Flora europaea 2. — Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar

  3. B. Baum 1978: The genus Tamarix. — Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Google Scholar

  4. E. Boissier 1849: Diagnoses plantarum orientalium novarum, ser. 1, 10. — Paris: M. Ducloux et cons. Google Scholar

  5. E. Boissier 1867: Flora orientalis 1. —  Basileae, Genevae: H. GeorgGoogle Scholar

  6. A. Bunge 1852: Tentamen generis Tamaricum species accuratius definiendi. — Dorpati:  J. C. Schuenmanni et C. MattieseniGoogle Scholar

  7. A. P. de Candolle 1828: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 3. —  Parisiis: Treuttel et WürtzGoogle Scholar

  8. M. W. Chase & H. G. Hill 1991: Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. —  Taxon 40: 215–220. Google Scholar

  9. D. Darriba , G. L. Taboada , R. Doallo & D. Posada 2012: jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. —  Nature Methods 9: 772. Google Scholar

  10. P. Dimopoulos , Th. Raus , E. Bergmeier , Th. Constantinidis , G. Iatrou , S. Kokkini , A. Strid & D. Tzanoudakis 2013: Vascular plants of Greece: An annotated checklist. — Berlin: Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem; Athens: Hellenic Botanical Society. — Engiera 31. Google Scholar

  11. J. J. Doyle & J. L. Doyle 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15. Google Scholar

  12. Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at [accessed 29 Jan 2015]. Google Scholar

  13. J. F. Gaskin & B. Schaal 2003: Molecular phylogenetic investigation of U.S. invasive Tamarix. — Syst. Bot. 28: 86–95. Google Scholar

  14. M. Hamilton 1999: Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. — Molec. Ecol. 8: 521–523. Google Scholar

  15. J. P. Huelsenbeck & F. Ronquist . 2001: MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. —  Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. Google Scholar

  16. D. Posada & T. R. Buckley 2004: Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages for the AIC and Bayesian approaches over Likelihood ratio tests. —  Syst. Biol. 53: 793–808. Google Scholar

  17. D. Posada & K. A. Crandall 1998: Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. — Bioinformatics 14: 817–818. Google Scholar

  18. S. Rivas-Martínez , A. Penas & T. E. Díaz 2004: Biogeographic Map of Europe. — León: Cartographic Service, University of León: published at  Google Scholar

  19. F. Ronquist & J. P. Huelsenbeck 2003: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. —  Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. Google Scholar

  20. N. Salamin , M. W. Chase , T. R. Hodkinson & V. Savolainen 2003: Assessing internal support with large phylogenetic DNA matrices. —  Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 27: 528–539. Google Scholar

  21. J. Shaw , E. B. Lickey , E. E. Schilling & R. L. Small 2007: Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. – Amer. J. Bot. 94: 275–288. Google Scholar

  22. A. Strid & K. Tan (ed.) 1997; 2002: Flora hellenica 1; 2. – Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books; Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag. Google Scholar

  23. D. L. Swofford 2002: PAUP, version 4.0b 10 for Macintosh. — Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

  24. K. Tamura , D. Peterson , N. Peterson , G. Steccher , M. Nei & S. Kumar 2011: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. —  Molec. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731–2739. Google Scholar

  25. B. Thiers 2015+ [continuously updated]: Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. — New York Botanical Garden: published at [accessed 29 Jan 2015]. Google Scholar

  26. N. Turland 2010: Tamarix hampeana Boiss. & Heldr. — Pp. 198–199 in: W. Greuter & Th. Raus (ed.), Med-Checklist Notulae 29. —  Willdenowia 40: 189–204. Google Scholar

  27. T. G. Tutin , V. H. Heywood , N. A. Burges , D. M. Moore , D. H. Valentine , S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (ed.) 1964–1980: Flora europaea 1–5. — Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar

  28. J. L. Villar , M. A. Alonso , A. Juan & M. B. Crespo 2012: Does Tamarix dalmatica (Tamaricaceae) occur in Spain? — Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 69: 253–258. Google Scholar

  29. J. L. Villar , M. A. Alonso , A. Juan & M. B. Crespo 2015: Remarks on typification of nineteen names in Tamarix (Tamaricaceae). — Nordic J. Bot. [early view: 1–10; DOI:]. Google Scholar

  30. J. L. Villar , M. A. Alonso , A. Vicente , A. Juan & M. B. Crespo 2014: The genus Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) in Crete (Greece). —  Willdenowia 44: 321–326. Google Scholar


Appendix: Tamarix africana and T. hampeana, specimens examined

Tamarix africana (for more specimens see Villar & al. 2012)

Algeria: “Cote de Barbarie”, Poiret (lectotype of Tamarix africana, P-LA, P00287249); “T. africana (n.), 5. andr. 3.g. ex Numidia”, Poiret (syntype of T. africana, Herb. Poiret in Herb. Moquin-Tandon, P00166702). — Morocco: Taza-Al Hoceima, Tizi Ouasli, road R505 from Tizi Ouasli to Aknoul, 30S VD 2545 [34°44′39″N, 03°49′09″W], 1252 m, 30 Apr 2013, Crespo, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T53MO & T54MO (ABH69534, ABH69535); Meknes, Khenifra, From Azrou to Khenifra, Oum Rabii sources, 30S TB 748608 [33°03′44″N, 05°24′43″W], 1223 m, 1 May 2013, Crespo, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T55MO & T56MO (ABH69594, ABH69593); Casablanca, Mohammedia, Oued Mefifik, below the bridge of N1 road, 29S PT 548298 [33°41′48″N,07°19′47″W], 5 m, 3 May 2013, Crespo, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T57MO & T59MO (ABH69591, ABH69589). — Spain: Valencia, Cullera, Cap de Cullera, 30S YJ 397414 [39°11′19″N, 00°13′28″W], 4 m, 10 May 2012, Vicente & Villar (ABH67412, ABH67410); Almería, Vera, between Coto de Vera and Puerto Rey, 30S XG 0418 [37°12′09″N, 01°49′41″W], 4 m, 14 May 2012, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T26AL (ABH67465); Almería, Pulpí, beside the sea, 30S XG1639 [37°23′25″N, 01°41′22″W], 11 m, 15 May 2012, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T35AL (ABH69653); Almería, Pulpí, Pilar de Jaravía, 30S XG 1639 [37°19′33″N, 00°57′25″W], 84 m, 15 May 2012, Alonso, Vicente & Villar T39AL & T42AL (ABH69649, ABH69646); Alicante, Albatera, on the way to Rambla Salada, 30S XH 8133 [38°13′36″N, 00°55′55″W], 230 m, 18 Mar 2013, Villar T127A, Agidló, Vicente, Quinto & Marchant (ABH648456); Alicante, Mutxamel, Río Monnegre, Next to Riopark, 3 OS XH 2157 [38°27′11″N, 01°36′47″W], 105 m, 17 Apr 2013, Moreno, Terrones & Villar (ABH69576, ABH69568, ABH69574, ABH69564).

Tamarix hampeana

Albania: Lushnje, beside the road to Durres, 34T CL 704007 [40°38′49″N, 19°28′05″E], 7 m, 26 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T4ALB (ABH58162); Lushnje, Babujne, beside the road, 34T CL 810268 [40°53′02″N, 19°35′15″E], 9 m, 26 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T5ALB (ABH58161). — Greece: Phalère, au bord des fosses, 14 Apr 1844, Heldreich 64 (lectotype of Tamarix hampeana G-BOIS G00330259); Phalareus, 1841, Spruner, (syntype of T. hampeana G-BOIS G00330260); Attica, 1842, Spruner (syntype of T. hampeana G00380106); Attica, Phalareus, 1844, Spruner (syntype of T. hampeana G00380107); Phalareus, Spruner (syntype of T. hampeana G00380108); Astros ad mare, Apr 1842, Boissier (syntype of T. hampeana G-BOIS G00330258); ad Phalerum, 1844, Heldreich (syntype of T. hampeana P06618760); Grèce Phalere, 1846, Heldreich (syntype of T. hampeana P05144597); in maritimis ad Phalerum, Apr 1844, de Heldreich (syntypes of T. hampeana G00380104, G00380104_a, G00380105, K000641864, P06618759); Attica, Apr 1844, de Heldreich (syntype of T. hampeana P06618441); Attica: in subpaludosis et ad ripas in halipedo Phaleri, 8 Apr 1847, “De Heldreich Herbarium Graecum Normale”, Heldreich (syntype of T. hampeana MA78790); Attica, Phaleri, 3 Apr 1890, Heldreich (G); Attica ad Phalerum, 3 May 1854, Heldreich (PR); ad Cephissi ostia, Phalaerum, May 1856, Heldreich (G); Attica, in subpaludosis et ad ripas in halipedo Phaleri, 5 Apr 1893, Heldreich 927 (G, 2 vouchers); Phaleres, Jun 1852, W. Barbey (G); ad Phalaerum, J un 1852, Heldreich (G); in maritimis ad Phaleri, 18/30 Apr 1852, Orphanides 318 (G); in maritimis Phaleri Atticae, 30 Mar 1852, Orphanides (PR); Regio aegaea orientalis, Insula Hios, ad litus orientale inter coenobium Panajia Mirtidhiotissa Mersinidhiou et pagum Virsi Passa, ad margines viae, forsan culta, 16 Apr 1976, 50 m, Greuter (G); Thessaloniki, in arenosis maritimis, Apr 1909, Dimonie (G, 2 vouchers; PR, a complex voucher with 3 T. parviflora and 1 T. hampeana branches); Zakynthos, oppidi et ad Kryonero, 28 May 1926, Bornmüller (G, 2 vouchers), Samos, in limosis ad ruinam templi Herae, prope Colonna, 12 Apr 1934, K. H. Rechinger & F. Rechinger 4002 (G); Phanarion prope Porto Lagos, in arenosis maritimis, Rechinger 22419 (G, as T. tetrandra); Kastades, Corfú, an der Strasse nach Gasturi in der Nähe des Hyllaeischen Hafens, 22 Apr 1896, Baenitz (PR); Epiro, Igoumenitsa, coastal salt marshes north-west of Igoumenitsa, 34S DJ 331738 [39°30′40″N, 20°13′19″E], 1 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T3GRE (ABH59028); ibid, 34S DJ 330737 [39°30′39″N, 20°13′15″E], 5 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T4GRE (ABH59027); ibid, 34S DJ 315746 [39°31′06″N, 20°12′13″E], 0 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T5GRE (ABH59026); ibid, 34S DJ 311754 [39°31′32″N, 20°11′57″E], 1 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T6GRE (ABH59025); Epiro, Ammoudia, Acherondas river delta, Tamarix grove between Mesopotamo and Ammoudia, 34S DJ 565436 [39°14′26″N, 20°29′46″E], 0 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T7GRE (ABH59040); ibid, 34S DJ 5743 [39°14′15″N, 20°30′19″E], 0 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T8GRE & T9GRE (ABH59039, ABH59038); ibid, 34S DJ 559428 [39°14′01″N, 20°29′21″E], 0 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T10GRE (ABH59037); Epiro, Koronisia, beside the sea, 34S DJ 884231 [39°03′27″N, 20°51′57″E], 2 m, 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T11GRE (ABH59036); Epiro, Strongyli, Tamarix grove on coastal marsh, 34S DJ 840312 [39°07′48″N, 20°48′57″E], 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T12GRE (ABH59031); Epiro, road Strongyli-Petra, Tamarix grove on coastal marsh, 34S DJ 838334 [39°08′59″N, 20°48′45″E], 17 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T13GRE (ABH59032); Western Greece, Paleros, 34S DH 897919 [38°46′35″N, 20°52′56″E], 25 m, 18 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T16GRE (ABH59857); Western Greece, road from Astakos to Messolonghi, 34S EH 137610 [38°29′52″N, 21°09′29″E], 0 m, 18 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T17GRE (ABH59858); Western Greece, Aitoniko, degraded coastal Tamarix grove, 34S EH 303537 [38°25′54″N, 21°20′53″E], 0 m, 18 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T18GRE (ABH59859); Western Greece, Messolonghi, 34S EH 367484 [38°23′00″N, 21°25′14″E], 0 m, 18 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T19GRE & T20GRE (ABH59861, ABH59860); ibid, 34S EH 366485 [38°23′02″N, 21°25′11″E], 0 m, 18 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T21GRE (ABH59862); Western Greece, Kounoupelli, salt marsh beside the sea, 34S EH 307171 [38°06′06″N, 21°21′02″E], 0 m, 18 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T25GRE, T26GRE & T27GRE (ABH59863, ABH59864, ABH59865); Peloponnisos, Marathopoli, south of the town, 34S EG 5160012 [37°03′21″N, 21°34′52″E], 20 m, 19 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T32GRE (ABH58545); Peloponnisos, salt marsh close to Pylos, 34S EF 588897 [36°57′08″N, 21°39′40″E], 0 m, 19 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T33GRE (ABH58544); Peloponnisos, Itilo beach, 34S FF 241617 [36°41′34″N, 22°23′21″E], 0 m, 20 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T35GRE (ABH58622); Peloponnisos, Valtaki, Tamarix grove between Agios Konstantinos and Valtaki, 34S FF 4172 [36°47′21″N, 22°34′54″E], 0 m, 20 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T36GRE & T37GRE (ABH58623, ABH58624); Peloponnisos, Agios Andreas, Karakouvni, 34S FG 564356 [37°21′14″N, 22°46′00″E], 8 m, 20 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T39GRE (ABH58625); Peloponnisos, Agios Andreas beach, salt marsh, 34S FG 571387 [37°22′56″N, 22°46′28″E], 0 m, 20 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T41GRE (ABH58621); Peloponnisos, Agia Anastasia, big salt marsh near Astros, 34S FG 555391 [37°23′08″N, 22°45′26″E], 0 m, 20 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T42GRE (ABH58620); Peloponnisos, Drepano, coastal Tamarix grove close to Drepano, 34S FG 741541 [37°31′04″N, 22°58′13″E], 0 m, 21 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T44GRE (ABH59002); Peloponnisos, Almyri, small grove in the mouth of a ravine, 34S FG 771903 [37°50′37″N, 23°00′48″E], 0 m, 21 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T49GRE (ABH58999); Attica, Glyfada, between Glyfada and Vouliagmeni, 34S GG 430914 [37°50′17″N, 23°45′44″E], 5 m, 22 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T52GRE (ABH59049); Attica, Saronida, 34S GG 522877 [37°48′07″N, 23°51′56″E], 3 m, 22 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T55GRE (ABH59016); Attica, Lavriou, degraded coastal Tamarix grove, 35S KB 403788 [37°43′11″N, 24°03′15″E], 9 m, 22 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T61GRE (ABH59051); Central Greece, Dilesi, beside the sea, 34S GH 378467 [38°20′14″N, 23°43′16″E], 6 m, 22 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T65GRE (ABH59021); Central Greece, Neo Thronio, Tamarix grove 200 m south of Camping Venezuela, 34S FH 494986 [38°49′27″N, 22°43′18″E], 9 m, 23 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T66GRE, T67GRE, T68GRE, T69GRE & T70GRE (ABH59875, ABH59871, ABH59872, ABH59873, ABH59874); Central Greece, Neo Thronio, 1 km north of Camping Venezuela, 34S FH 478997 [38°50′03″N, 22°42′12″E], 6 m, 23 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T72GRE (ABH59877); Central Greece, Anthili, in a river floodplain, 34S FJ 302025 [38°51′44″N, 22°30′05″E], 12 m, 23 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T75GRE (ABH59866); Thessalia, Nees Pagases, small grove close to Volos, 34S FJ 664551 [39°19′46″N, 22°55′52″E], 0 m, 23 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T77GRE (ABH59870); Central Macedonia, Limenas, degraded Tamarix grove, 34T FK 334498 [40°11′18″N, 22°34′2″E], 23 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T78GRE & T79GRE (ABH59868, ABH59869); Central Macedonia, Methoni, Aliakmona river delta, 34T FK 364833 [40°29′22″N, 22°36′34″E], 8 m, 24 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T81GRE (ABH59867). — Montenegro: Ulcinj, Sveti Nikola, Tamarix grove in the Bojana river mouth, in the northern branch of the river, close to the Albanian border, 34T CM 632367 [41°52′16″N, 19°21′09″E], 27 Apr 2011, Martínez & Villar T2MNE, T3MNE, T4MNE & T5MNE (ABH57893, ABH57891, ABH57890, ABH57892). — Turkey: Marais sales situés sur les bords de la route conduisant de Smyrne à Vorula, à 2 lieues environ à l'est de cette première ville, 29 May 1854, Balansa 130 (type of T. hampeana var. smyrnea G-BOIS; G, 2 vouchers); “Constantinopla”, 1845, Noë (G-BOIS, ut T. parviflora); Golfe de Smyrne, Echelle de Papa, 24 Apr 1854, Balansa 133 (type of T. hampeana var. composita, G); Aydm, Söke, B. Menderes Agli, Avion merlii, denis kendri, 10 Apr 1976, Uslu 4173 (G); Trockenes Bachbett, Aydın, Samsun Daği bei Güzelçlami, 8 Apr 1990, Nydegger (G440247).

© 2015 BGBM Berlin.
Jose L. Villar, Nicholas J. Turland, Ana Juan, John F. Gaskin, M. Ángeles Alonso, and Manuel B. Crespo "Tamarix minoa (Tamaricaceae), a new species from the island of Crete (Greece) based on morphological and plastid molecular sequence data," Willdenowia 45(2), 161-172, (17 June 2015).
Published: 17 June 2015

Back to Top