Translator Disclaimer
13 July 2017 The alien vascular flora of Linosa (Pelagie Islands, Strait of Sicily): update and management proposals
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This paper provides an up-to-date overview of the naturalized alien plants of Linosa (Pelagie Archipelago, Sicily), which includes 83 taxa and accounts for 29 % of the total island's flora. Among these plants, 6 are invasive, 49 are naturalized and 28 are casual. With respect to previous available data, our field investigations resulted in the addition of 31 new xenophytes (21 casual and 10 fully naturalized). One of these species is new to the whole European territory (Kleinia anteuphorbia), 6 of them are new to Sicily and 11 are recorded for the first time on circum-Sicilian islets. For each alien plant, we indicate the habitat where the naturalization has been observed by using the codes proposed by Natura 2000 and Corine Biotopes habitat classification. We also provide a list of 159 alien plants that are cultivated in Linosa, but currently not naturalized, in order to underline the key role played by horticulture and gardening in the introduction of exotic species. In order to address this phenomenon and its huge impact on the integrity of both the natural and the traditional rural landscape, several actions are proposed that aim at preventing, controlling and monitoring both the ongoing and the potential invasion processes.

Version of record first published online on 13 July 2017 ahead of inclusion in August 2017 issue.

Introduction

Invasive plant species are a growing problem of global concern due to their long-lasting negative effects on native ecosystems, such as the degradation of native plant communities and natural habitats through direct competition with native species and the homogenization of landscapes (Williamson 1996). Although plant invasion is a globally widespread phenomenon that affects almost all ecosystem types, certain habitats seem to suffer the negative consequences more than others (Chytrý & al. 2009). For instance, frequently disturbed and nutrient-enriched sites are widely acknowledged to be particularly prone to invasion by alien plants. However, in such ecological contexts, the negative consequences of invasions may be underestimated, as these areas are already considered degraded from an environmental point of view. However, anthropogenic sites may be only the first and necessary stage preceding the invasion of natural habitats in the surrounding areas. Hence, also these disturbed sites should be constantly monitored and studied.

Islands, particularly smaller ones, represent a peculiar case. In fact, the high seasonal pressure of tourists, combined with the ecological fragility of insular biota, makes island ecosystems particularly prone to the establishment and spread of invasive alien species (Gimeno & al. 2006). Furthermore, the endemism rate on islands, which island biogeography theories predict and numerous field evidences confirm to be generally higher than in comparable continental areas, enhances the likelihood that rare or threatened species will be affected by invasion, leading to significant ecological impacts. As they are also geographically confined areas, islands are ideal places to successfully implement effective protection of invasion, as well as for control and eradication strategies to tackle the problem. Hence, insular ecosystems represent preferential areas to investigate both causes and consequences of biological invasions in natural environments (Hulme & al. 2008). Mediterranean island ecosystems seem not to be an exception to this pattern. Although they have not reached the levels of concern recorded on many oceanic islands such as Hawai'i, a growing number of invasive alien plants has been found in the Mediterranean realm in the last decades (e.g. Lloret & al. 2005). The increasing awareness and the large relevance of the problem is further demonstrated by several EU LIFE projects, already completed or still ongoing in the Mediterranean area, which include some specific actions aimed at controlling and eradicating invasive alien plants (e.g. LIFE11+ NAT/IT/000093 Pelagic Birds; LIFE08 NAT/IT/000353 Montecristo 2010).

In Italy, after the recent inventory of the non-native flora published by Celesti-Grapow & al. (2009, 2010), an increasing number of reports on alien species point out the increasing frequency of invasion cases both at the national (Nepi & al. 2009) and regional (Galasso & Banfi 2010) level. This trend has concerned both peninsular and insular territory. However, there is a stark difference in the level of available information between islands of different sizes. A number of studies have investigated plant invasion in the largest Mediterranean islands (Lavorel 1999; Lloret & al. 2005; Lambdon & Hulme 2006; Hulme & al. 2008; Lambdon & al. 2008; Vila & al. 2008; Bacchetta & al. 2009; Podda & al. 2012; Lazzaro & al. 2013), where-as little is known about small and medium-sized islands (Pasta & La Mantia 2008; La Mantia & al. 2009a; Pretto & al. 2010; Domina & Mazzola 2011; Lastrucci & al. 2012), especially when they are less affected by human impacts.

A good representation of this scenario may be the island of Linosa, a small (5.4 km2) volcanic island, belonging to the Pelagie Archipelago in the Strait of Sicily, where the increasing spread of alien plants has also been a consequence of the progressive abandonment of agriculture (Pasta & al. 2015). In fact, the abandonment of many cultivated lands has made ecological niches available to the successful establishment of alien plant species. Nicotiana glauca Graham is a good example of an invasive alien plant particularly able to exploit areas released from agricultural activities (see  http://www.pelagicbirds.eu). Despite the fact that the flora and vegetation of Linosa have been surveyed since the 19th century, including the alien component, a comprehensive assessment of alien flora has never been carried out. In this paper, an updated checklist of all the alien plants occurring in Linosa is provided for the first time. The taxa are recorded as cultivated, casual, naturalized or invasive, according to the standardized classification of Richardson & al. (2000). Semi-quantitative information about the abundance and the local level of invasiveness is also given for each taxon.

The systematic collection and subsequent elaboration of data, arising both from the literature and specific field surveys, had two goals:

(1) providing an initial, overall picture of the alien flora of a small Mediterranean island that may represent an essential reference point to evaluate future trends as well as temporal and spatial invasion dynamics for each taxon;

(2) suggesting the most suitable management options for the control of the worst invasive species, taking into account their current distribution as well as the most likely future trends.

The main aim of this research is to find out an effective strategy in order to reduce the future impacts of plant invasions on Linosa island.

Material and methods

Census and mapping

The field data on the presence and distribution of alien plant species were collected as part of two projects. The first set of data was acquired in 2009 (June), 2010 (June) and 2011 (July) during college internships for undergraduate biologists and naturalists, promoted and carried out by the cultural association For-Mare (for details see  http://www.for-mare.eu/). The island was cartographically divided into square sectors with 500 m sides, within which non-native flora was carefully surveyed while walking along the main roads as well as the secondary streets (and other places including footpaths, surroundings of private gardens and residential areas; private areas, either fenced or not, in which the plants were clearly planted, were not considered). Within each sector the frequency of each taxon was estimated using the following semiquantitative scale: C = common species, occurring all over the island's territory in anthropogenic sites; F = frequent species, but with some distribution gaps; S = sporadic species, infrequent, but whose occurrence should not escape the eye of an expert; R = rare species, whose presence is localized and could escape even the eye of an expert; RR = very rare species, hardly noticeable except through a thorough reconnaissance, present in 1 or 2 sites with a few individuals. During field surveys, a satellite Global Positioning System (GPS) and a personal digital assistant (PDA) with the application ArcPad® were used to verify the sector to which the surveyed area belonged.

During the spring of 2013, specific field surveys were carried out on the island in order to record in a systematic way, using geo-referenced data, the distribution of nuclei (areas or lines) of Nicotiana glauca and Carpobrotus cf. acinaciformis (L.) L. Bolus, which are target species of a specific action under the Project LIFE11+ NAT/IT/000093 Pelagic Birds (Conservation of the main European population of Calonectris d. diomedea and other pelagic birds on Pelagic Islands) (Badalamenti & al. 2016). Analogous field surveys were carried out in the following years, until the summer of 2016. The presence and distribution of all alien plant species observed was recorded, assessing the invasive status and the frequency by adopting the same method described above. Furthermore, in order to implement the overall database of cultivated alien plants on Linosa island, other systematic surveys were carried out in the surroundings of private gardens and cultivated lands.

Identification and taxonomic treatment of the surveyed taxa

For the classification of alien plants, Flora d'ltalia (Pignatti 1982) and Flora europaea (Tutin & al. 19641980, 1993) were mainly consulted. As they are outdated works, they do not always allow the adequate identification of alien taxa. Hence, dichotomous keys and descriptions of international Floras were also accessed, such as Flora of North Americahttp://floranorthamerica.org/), Flora of Chinahttp://efloras.org) and Flora New South Waleshttp://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/floraonline.htm), as well as other specific monographic contributions (e.g. Shaw 2008; Verloove 2008; Ward 2008). The consultation of European garden flora (Walters & al. 1984, 1986, 1989; Cullen & al. 1995, 1997, 2000) also allowed the identification of many taxa that had escaped from cultivation. The taxonomic-nomenclatural treatment of plant names largely follows Conti & al. (2005) and Celesti-Grapow & al. (2010).

Assessment of invasive status

In the present work, in contrast to what is reported in related studies at the national and regional level (e.g. Celesti-Grapow & al. 2009, 2010; Galasso & Banfi 2010), the term alien is used to refer not only to the plants that are alien to the Italian flora (neophytes, archaeophytes and cryptogenic species), but also to taxa that are considered to be native in other regions of Italy, whose voluntary or accidental introduction to Linosa has been confirmed on the basis of floristic works concerning the island; they were named as “locally alien” (see the following section). Information about residence time was acquired mainly from Celesti-Grapow & al. (2009), while cryptogenic species in Linosa were considered only those reported at national level in Banfi & Galasso (2010).

The invasive status of each alien plant was assessed, distinguishing those taxa exclusively occurring under cultivation from those more or less established within the local ecosystems, which were indicated as casual, naturalized or invasive in accordance with the classification of Richardson & al. (2000). The assessment of invasive status is based on the information issuing from the field surveys, the consultation of regional and national bibliographic works, of the GISD ( http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/) and the DAISIE ( http://www.europe-aliens.org/) websites, which are the main databases concerning invasive species at the global and European levels, respectively. Finally, the potential impact of each taxon on local natural and semi-natural ecosystems was assessed strictly considering the chance of establishment, spread and effective inter-specific competition of each alien species with the local flora of Linosa, and taking into account the specific climatic and microsite characteristics of this small Mediterranean island. To do this, available literature on the invasive behaviour of the considered species was thoroughly checked, paying special attention to records and papers concerning the Mediterranean realm. The economic (current or potential) impact of such alien plants as agricultural or street weeds was not taken into account.

Bibliographic research

In order to find all the alien plant species up to now recorded as growing wild in Linosa, the available literature was consulted. Much of the published information on the alien flora of Linosa derives from papers focused on species that are locally employed for agricultural and ornamental purposes (Hammer & al. 1997; Domina & Mazzola 2008), and from a note recently published by Domina & al. (2013). The originality of the data collected in the field was also checked against the most up-to-date checklists of the vascular flora of Linosa (Di Martino 1961; Brullo & Siracusa 1996b; Pasta 2002; La Mantia & al. 2009a) and taking into account the plants quoted in the most recent papers on the island's vegetation (Di Martino 1958; Maugeri & al. 1979; Brullo & Piccione 1980; Brullo & Marcenò 1985; Brullo & Siracusa 1996a).

Results

Overall, 83 non-native plants were found to be growing in the wild in Linosa. Among them, 28 were casual (21 of which are new to the island), 49 were naturalized (10 of which are new) and 6 were invasive (all of which were already recorded;  Table 1 in Supplementary Material online (wi.47.47205_Supplement.pdf)). A list of 159 non-native taxa that are strictly confined to cultivation, with no currently recorded signs of naturalization, is provided in  Table 2 in Supplementary Material online (wi.47.47205_Supplement.pdf). About one third of the alien plant species were presumed to have been accidentally introduced in the island, while the remaining two thirds were deliberately introduced for the following purposes: (1) ornamental (44.6 %) (plants used in private and public green areas); (2) agricultural services (8.4%) (plants used to make hedges or to produce tools and equipment); (3) food or medicinal (7.2 %) (especially fruit trees and aromatic plants); (4) forest or hydrological (7.2 %) (mostly trees planted for afforestation). Currently, local natural habitats of community interest according to the Habitats Directive 92/43CE appear to be only marginally affected by the spread of invasive alien species ( Table 3 in Supplementary Material online (wi.47.47205_Supplement.pdf)).

It should be noted that the plant communities that are more adapted to the peculiar and adverse pedoclimatic conditions of Linosa, apart from being the richest in terms of species of high biogeographical and conservation value, were found to be less prone to invasion by alien plants. Among them, pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the Thero-Brachypodietea (Habitat 6220), thermo-Mediterranean and pre-desert scrub (Habitat 5330) and low formations of Euphorbia close to cliffs (Habitat 5320) are the most representative cases. Abandoned terraced fields and fallows, characterized by a slightly lower number of taxa of biogeographical and/or conservation value than the three aforementioned habitats, were found to host 3–5 times more exotics; a similar pattern, though less pronounced, was found in the island's arable lands. Furthermore, chasmophytic vegetation of volcanic rock outcrops belonging to Habitats 8220 and 8320 seem to be quite vulnerable to plant invasion. It also should be pointed out that heavily degraded sites, such as quarries and waste landfills, as well as urban and suburban areas, have high susceptibility to invasion and are home to as many as 52 of the 83 total alien species, thus accounting for 62.7% of the overall alien flora of Linosa.

Discussion

A diachronic comparison of the main floristic checklists of Linosa allowed us to appreciate the increasing number of casual, naturalized or invasive alien plants, probably due to stronger research effort during the recent field investigations specifically focused on them. In fact, only 17 alien species were reported by Di Martino (1961), then the number increased slightly to 25 (Brullo & Siracusa 1996b) and 32 (La Mantia & al. 2009a), until reaching today's number of 83 taxa. This is a rather high value, as these species account for 29 % of the whole island's flora. In Sicily, the alien flora represents 8.5 % of the total vascular flora (Celesti-Grapow & al. 2010), while the national average reaches 13 % (Celesti-Grapow & al. 2009). The value for Linosa is also high in comparison to similar Mediterranean islands. For example, no island within the Tuscan Archipelago gets close to this value (with a mean value of about 10 %), and only the island of Elba, about 44 times larger than Linosa, displays a higher absolute number of naturalized alien plants (Lazzaro & al. 2014). However, the share of invasive species in the alien flora of Linosa is lower, reaching 7.2 %, compared with the average of 22 % in the Tuscan Archipelago (Lazzaro & al. 2014) and the national average, which reaches almost 16 % (Celesti-Grapow & al. 2010). This result suggests that a high portion of the island of Linosa is covered by habitats with low invadability, but it cannot be entirely ruled out that many of the ongoing invasive processes are still at an early stage and may spread much further across the island. Moreover, some alien species showed, in a relatively short time frame, a large increase in their natural distribution. For example, Boerhavia coccinea Mill., a well-known South African herb invader of cultivated fields and urban areas, is rapidly spreading through abandoned lands on the Sicilian coast. The first spontaneous individuals of B. coccinea were observed on Linosa in 2006; in just 10 years this alien species has gone through a rapid range expansion, and within two years it had invaded almost all the main roads of the island and successfully established in several cultivated fields, especially prickly-pear orchards.

It should be noted that the large increase in the number of alien species recorded (a 2.5-fold increase in less than 10 years) could be attributed to the increased attention paid to biological invasions in recent years and the lack of previous investigations focused on the alien flora of Linosa. Also, it illustrates that in many small-island cases, where similarly detailed studies have not been conducted, current statistics for invasive species may be considerably underestimated. Our survey seems to support the higher vulnerability of small Mediterranean island ecosystems to invasion by exotic plants than that observed in adjacent continental areas or on the main islands, as already highlighted by Pasta & La Mantia (2013). Of 83 alien species reported here, 31 are new to Linosa. Among them, 6 species [Agave attenuata Salm-Dyck, Campsis radicans (L.) Bureau, Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britton & Rose, Plumbago auriculata Lam., Portulaca grandiflora Hook, and Portulacaria afra Jacq.] are new for the alien flora of Sicily. Another eleven [Boerhavia coccinea, Erythrostemon gilliesii (Wall, ex Hook.) Klotzsch, Ipomoea indica (Burm.) Merr., Kalanchoe daigremontiana Raym.-Hamet & H. Perrier, Leucaena leucocephala subsp. glabrata (Rose) Zárate, Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw., Parthenocissus cf. quinquefolia, Phoenix canariensis Chabaud, Pittosporum tobira (Thunb.) W. T. Aiton, Tagetes erecta L. and Trichocereus spachianus (Lem.) Riccob.] are new to the circum-Sicilian islands. Of particular interest is the finding of Kleinia anteuphorbia (L.) Haw., as this is the first record of this species in the whole of Europe (see Greuter 2006+). This succulent species, native to Morocco (northern Africa), is sporadically cultivated for ornamental purposes in Sicily and is absent from all other circum-Sicilian islands (see Domina & Mazzola 2008), while it is quite frequently used by the inhabitants of Linosa. The small detected nucleus probably originated from the abandonment of pruning residues; pruning is a cultural practice to improve plant re-sprouting. Although this could be an isolated case of casual naturalization, constant monitoring and the evaluation of demographic trends are recommended as precautionary management options.

With regards to other rare alien species in the circum-Sicilian islands, Datura wrightii Regel, already reported in Linosa by Hammer & al. (1997) and actually very common on the island, was also observed on Lampedusa island (G. Parolo pers. obs.). Erysimum cheiri (L.) Crantz is still present on the island of Salina (S. Pasta pers. obs.), where it had been previously reported only by Lojacono-Pojero (1878). Finally, the importance of finding spontaneous individuals of Kalanchoe daigremontiana must be stressed, as its spread may have been previously over-estimated due to the hybrid K. ×houghtonii D. B. Ward, as recent reports of this nothospecies on other Mediterranean islands (Podda & al. 2012; Lazzaro & al. 2013) and along the European Atlantic coast (Silva & al. 2015) would suggest. The marked ability to thrive in dry habitats and prolific and effective reproduction via leaf-borne vegetative propagules make K. daigremontiana very likely to spread in the near future. Also of particular interest is the finding of Hylocereus undatus growing wild at different sites on the island. This cactus species, native to tropical America, has never been reported in Sicily, and in Italian territory is otherwise solely found in Sardinia (Lazzeri & al. 2013). In Sicily, individuals of the congener species H. triangularis (L.) Britton & Rose had escaped from cultivation and been previously observed (Mazzola 1981).

In Linosa, a total of 242 alien plant species, 83 naturalized and 159 only cultivated, were recorded. This is a huge number if compared to that of the native flora, which includes 283 specific and infraspecific taxa (La Mantia & al. 2009a; Domina & al. 2013). It therefore seems evident that the massive introduction of ornamentals, especially in private gardens, is one of the main causes of the recent invasion by exotic species ( Table 3 in Supplementary Material online (wi.47.47205_Supplement.pdf)). Our research shows that nearly 45 % of the alien plant species were intentionally introduced for their aesthetic value in Linosa. This is also a general trend as the incidence of such species among invasive taxa is widely recognized to be quite high (e.g. Reichard & White 2001 ; Foxcroft & al. 2008). For most of the nonnative, cultivated species, it appears to be very difficult to predict whether or not they will be able to spread in the wild in the future and whether they will eventually compete with the native flora and threaten local biodiversity (Williamson 1996), as the invasiveness of a species is particularly influenced by local dynamics (Pino & al. 2013). However, in other cases, it is likely that the natural spread of some alien species is just a matter of time. It is on these species that most of the management and control strategies should be focused, in order to intervene as promptly as possible, thus significantly increasing the chances of success in tackling invasive species (Myers & al. 2000). For example, Senecio angulatus L. f., hitherto only present in cultivation, is likely to escape to the wild as it is fairly common in Mediterranean climate areas and has shown a considerable increase in its level of diffusion in island ecosystems (Celesti-Grapow & al. 2016), including Sicily (E. Badalamenti pers. obs.).

In this regard, it is highly desirable to set a limit to the uncontrolled introduction of alien taxa, particularly those introduced for afforestation or rehabilitation purposes, such as Acacia sp., Pinus halepensis Mill. and Tamarix canariensis Willd., or autochthonous species such as Spartium junceum L. (Cardinale & al. 2010) or other tree species that have already shown considerable invasive potential both regionally [e.g. Acacia saligna (Labill.) H. L. Wendl. (Bazan & Speciale 2002), Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle (Badalamenti & al. 2012), Melia azedarach L. (Badalamenti & al. 2013) and Parkinsonia aculeata L. (Bazan & al. 2011)] and in circum-Sicilian islands [e.g. Acacia cyclops A. Cunn. ex G. Don (Pasta & al. 2012; Badalamenti & al. 2014) and Anredera cordifolia (Ten.) Steenis (Rossitto & Ilardi 2000; Pasta & al. 2016)]. Leucaena leucocephala subsp. glabrata and Vachellia karroo (Hayne) Banfi & Galasso are two other non-native woody species that, while showing only early signs of naturalization on the island, need to be carefully monitored in light of their incipient invasiveness in Mediterranean Europe (e.g. Dana & al. 2003) and in other Mediterranean-type ecosystems (O'Connor 1995). Plants alien to Linosa but native elsewhere in the Mediterranean basin should also be subject to the same precautionary measures. It is in fact very likely that the establishment and spread of species such as Chamaerops humilis L. (Ardenghi & Mossini 2013; Buono & Manni 2013), Arbutus unedo L., Nerium oleander L. and Phillyrea latifolia L. may alter the structure, composition and physiognomy of the local vegetation in the medium and long term.

Conclusions

Based on the results presented here, Linosa appears to be particularly prone to invasion by non-native plant species, not only due to substantial introductions for ornamental and horticultural purposes, but also as a consequence of the increasing availability of ecological niches linked to the growing abandonment of traditional agricultural practices. In fact, nutrient-rich, abandoned sites are especially exposed to invasion by several alien pioneer species, while the linear structures (dry-stone walls, terraces and prickly-pear hedges) connected with local, traditional cultures often seem to represent a preferential path for exotic species, whose invasive success is known to be facilitated by the availability of disturbed, moist and shady microhabitats.

It appears urgent to start an intense, awareness-raising campaign addressed to the local community about the issue of biological invasions and their possible impacts on local natural heritage. In our opinion, the sharing of certain clear rules on alien species introduction and trade is the only way to ensure that the planned and/or expected monitoring activities of the non-native flora, as well as control and eradication interventions of the invasive taxa, such as those carried out within the afore-mentioned project LIFE Pelagic Birds, are not frustrated by their prompt reintroduction (Dehnen-Schmutz & al. 2007). With this aim, a clear legislative reference is the recent EU Regulation No. 1143/2014, including provisions aimed at preventing and managing the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. The data presented here underline the need to integrate the policies aimed at the protection and management of natural resources with those related to the preservation, enhancement and possible recovery of local cultivation practices and farming systems, which appear at risk today (La Mantia & al. 2012, 2013). This is particularly relevant in the context of Mediterranean islets, which are often characterized by patches of extensive crops, resting crop areas or fallows, which often represent a useful niche for several species of particular biogeographic and/or conservation interest (Brullo & Marcenò 1980, 1985; Brullo 1983; La Mantia & al. 2011). The need for integrated management has been emphasized by Pretto & al. (2010) in similar microinsular contexts and has been recognized within the management plan of the Site of Community Importance ITA040001 Isola di Linosa (designated as Special Area of Conservation ITA040001 Isola di Linosa after the adoption of effective conservation measures) and Special Protection Area ITA040013 Arcipelago delle Pelagie-Area marina e terrestre, where the key role of Mediterranean agroecosystems (La Mantia & al. 2009a, b) in the conservation of native biodiversity is adequately stressed. The succession processes after land-abandonment should be counteracted by means of dedicated incentives in support of agricultural activities, such as rewarding those farmers who adopt and preserve the local germplasm (Di Lorenzo & al. 2010; Guidi & al. 2013; Sottile & al. 2013). This could help make Linosa a reserve for the preservation of cultivated germplasm, as was already proposed twenty years ago by Hammer & al. (1997).

Acknowledgements

Some of the surveys were carried out within the Project LIFE11+ NAT/IT/000093 Pelagic Birds, Conservation of the main European population of Calonectris d. diomedea and other pelagic birds on Pelagic Islands, and within educational stages arranged in 2010 and 2011 by the cultural association For-mare ( http://www.for-mare.eu/), in agreement with the University of Pavia. We thank Dario Savini (For-mare, ECO-SISTEMI), Chiara Lombardi (For-mare, ENEA) and the University's students, who contributed to data-collection in Linosa in 2010 and 2011: Aurora Conti, Stefania Dal Pra, Silvia Micheli, Caterina Ricci, Bruna Ferrarese, Ariola Konci, Sara Galii, Manuela Piccardo, Roberta Sacchi, Mirko Saccomando, Cristiana Viotti, Luca Stimimann, Silvia Migliavacca, Anna Colucci, Silvio Ottonello, Selene Ruccione, Serena Manserra, Lorenzo Bina, Luca Marchesi and Riccardo D'Agnese. We are also grateful to Maurizio Sajeva, Rocco Lo Duca, Camillo Cusimano and Giovanna Sala for their valuable support in the correct identification of some new taxa, and to Pasquale Giardina for providing us with precious information about local forest history as well as for his specific knowledge about the location of some alien plant species. We also thank Philip W. Lambdon (c/o Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

1.

Ardenghi N. M. G. & Mossini S. 2013: Notula 1961. Chamaerops humilis L. — P. 94 in: Notulae alla checklist della flora vascolare italiana 15 (1958–1999). — Inform. Bot. Ital. 45: 93–109. Google Scholar

2.

Bacchetta G., Mayoral García-Berlanga O. & Podda L. 2009: Catálogo de la flora exótica de Cerdeña (Italia). — Flora Montiber. 41: 35–61. Google Scholar

3.

Badalamenti E., Barone E., Pasta S., Sala G. & La Mantia T. 2012: Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle (fam. Simaroubaceae) in Sicilia e cenni storici sulla sua introduzione in Italia. — Naturalista Sicil., ser. 4, 36: 117–164. Google Scholar

4.

Badalamenti E., Cusimano D., La Mantia T. & Pasta S. 2013: The recent spread of the invasive woody alien plant Melia azedarach L. (Meliaceae) in Sicily. — Naturalista Sicil., ser. 4, 37: 505–513. Google Scholar

5.

Badalamenti E., Gristina L., La Mantia T., Novara A., Pasta S., Lauteri M., Fernandes P., Correia O. & Máguas C. 2014: Relationship between recruitment and mother plant vitality in the alien species Acacia Cyclops A. Cunn. ex G. Don. —  Forest Ecol. Managem. 331: 237–244. Google Scholar

6.

Badalamenti E., Gristina L., Laudicina V. A, Novara A., Pasta S., La Mantia T. 2016: The impact of Carpobrotus cfr. acinaciformis (L.) L. Bolus on soil nutrients, microbial communities structure and native plant communities in Mediterranean ecosystems. —  Pl. & Soil 409: 19–34. Google Scholar

7.

Banfi E. & Galasso G. (ed.) 2010: La flora esotica lombarda. — Milano: Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano. Google Scholar

8.

Bazan G. & Speciale M. 2002: Processi di spontaneizzazione in Sicilia di Acacia saligna (Mimosaceae, Magnoliophyta). — Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 12: 99–100. Google Scholar

9.

Bazan G., Marino P. & Orlando A. M. 2011: Nuovi dati sull'espansione di Parkinsonia aculeata (Caeasalpinaceae) in Sicilia. — Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 22: 27–30. 27–30. Google Scholar

10.

Brullo S. 1983: L' Hordeion leporini in Sicilia. — Arch. Bot. Biogeogr. Ital. 58: 55–88. Google Scholar

11.

Brullo S. & Marcenò C. 1980: II Diplotaxion erucoidis in Sicilia, con considerazioni sulla sintassonomia e distribuzione. — Not. Fitosoc. 15: 27–44. Google Scholar

12.

Brullo S. & Marcenò C. 1985: Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione nitrofila della Sicilia. — Colloq. Phytosoc. 12: 23–148. Google Scholar

13.

Brullo S. & Piccione V. 1980: Carta della vegetazione di Linosa (scala 1:12.500). — Pp. 5–66 in: Esempi di cartografia della vegetazione di alcune aree della Sicilia. — Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Programma Finalizzato Promozione Quahtà dell' Ambiente (AQ/1/37–40). Google Scholar

14.

Brullo S. & Siracusa G. 1996a: Studio fitosociologico dell' isola di Linosa. — Doc. Phytosoc. 16: 123–174. Google Scholar

15.

Brullo S. & Siracusa G. 1996b: La flora dell' isola di Linosa (Arcipelago delle Pelagie, Sicilia). — Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania 28: 471–497. Google Scholar

16.

Buono V. & Manni Q. G. 2013: Noterella 0113. Chamaerops humilis L.. — Acta Plantarum Notes 2: 142. Google Scholar

17.

Cardinale M., Brusetti L., Lanza A., Orlando S., Daffonchio D., Puglia A. M. & Quatrini P. 2010: Rehabilitation of Mediterranean anthropogenic soils using symbiotic wild legume shrubs: plant establishment and impact on the soil bacterial community structure. —  Applied Soil Ecology 46: 1–8. Google Scholar

18.

Celesti-Grapow L., Alessandrini A., Arrigoni P. V., Banfi E. , Bernardo L., Bovio M., Brandu G., Cagiotti M. R., Camarda I., Carli E., Conti F., Fascetti S., Galasso G., Gubellini L., La Valva V., Lucchese F., Marchiori S., Mazzola P., Peccenini S., Poldini L., Pretto F., Prosser F., Siniscalco C., Villani M. C., Viegi L., Wilhalm T. & Blasi C. 2009: Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy. —  Pl. Biosyst. 143: 386–430. Google Scholar

19.

Celesti-Grapow L., Bassi L., Brundu G., Camarda I., Carli E., D'Auria G., Del Guacchio E., Domina G., Ferretti G., Foggi B., Lazzaro L., Mazzola P., Peccenini S., Pretto F., Stinca A. & Blasi C. 2016: Plant invasions on small Mediterranean islands: An overview. —  Pl. Biosyst. 150: 1119–1133. Google Scholar

20.

Celesti-Grapow L., Pretto F., Carli E. & Blasi C. (ed.) 2010: Flora vascolare alloctona e invasiva delle regioni d'ltalia. — Roma: Casa Editrice Università La Sapienza. Google Scholar

21.

Chytrý M., Pyšek P., Wild J., Pino J., Maskell L. C. & Vilà M. 2009: European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. —  Diversity & Distrib. 15: 98–107. Google Scholar

22.

Conti F., Abbate G., Alessandrini A. & Blasi C. (ed.) 2005: An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. — Roma: Palombi Editori. Google Scholar

23.

Cullen J., Alexander J. C. M., Brady A., Brickell C. D., Edmondson J. R., Green P. S., Heywood V. H., Jørgensen P.-M., Jury S. L., Knees S. G., Maxwell H. S., Miller D. M., Robson N. K. B., Walters S. M., Yeo P. F. (ed.) 2000: The European garden flora. A manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass, 4: Dicotyledons (Part IV: Loganiaceae to Compositae). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

24.

Cullen J., Alexander J. C. M., Brady A., Brickell C. D., Green P. S., Heywood V. H., Jørgensen P.-M., Jury S. L., Knees S. G., Leslie A. C., Mattews V. A., Robson N. K. B., Walters S. M. & Yeo P. F. (ed.) 1995: The European garden flora. A manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass, 4: Dicotyledons (Part II: Dilleniaceae to Leguminosae). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

25.

Cullen J., Alexander J. C. M., Brickell C. D., Edmondson J. R., Green P. S., Heywood V. H., Jørgensen P.-M., Jury S. L., Knees S. G., Mattews V. A., Maxwell H. S., Miller D. M., Nelson E. C., Robson N. K. B., Walters S. M. & Yeo P. F. (ed.) 1997: The European garden flora. A manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass, 5: Dicotyledons (Part III: Limnanthaceae to Oleaceae). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

26.

DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. 2008+ [continuously updated] : Delivering Alien Invasive Species In Europe. — Published at  http://www.europe-aliens.org/[accessed 1 Feb 2016]. Google Scholar

27.

Dana E., Randall R. P., Sanz-Elorza M. & Sobrino E. 2003: First evidence of the invasive behaviour of Leucaena leucocephala in Europe. — Oryx 37: 14. Google Scholar

28.

Danin A., Domina G. & Raimondo F. M. 2008: Microspecies of the Portulaca oleracea aggregate found on major Mediterranean islands (Sicily, Cyprus, Crete, Rhodes). — Fl. Medit. 18: 89–107. Google Scholar

29.

Dehnen-Schmutz K., Touza J., Perrings C. & Williamson M. 2007: A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. —  Diversity & Distrib. 13: 527–534. Google Scholar

30.

Di Lorenzo R., Carimi F. & La Mantia T. 2010: The viticulture of Lampedusa, a heritage which is disappearing before being known. — Pp. 59–64 in: Proceedings 3rd International Congress of Mountain Viticulture, Castiglione di Sicilia, Catania, Italy, 12–14 May 2010. — Aosta: CERVIM. Google Scholar

31.

Di Martino A. 1958: Nuovo con tributo alla flora inedita delle Pelagie. — Lav. Ist. Bot. Giard. Colon. Palermo 16: 84–93. Google Scholar

32.

Di Martino A. 1961: Flora e vegetazione. — In: Zavattari E. & Coll. (a cura di), Biogeografia delle Isole Pelagie. — Rendiconti Accad. Naz. XL, 11: 163–261. Google Scholar

33.

Domina G. & Mazzola P. 2008: Flora ornamentale delle isole circumsiciliane. — Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 19: 107–119. Google Scholar

34.

Domina G. & Mazzola P. 2011: Considerazioni biogeografiche sulla presenza di specie aliene nella flora vascolare del Mediterraneo. —  Biogeographia 30: 269–276. Google Scholar

35.

Domina G., Soldano A., Scafidi F. & Danin A. 2013: Su alcune piante nuove delle Isole Pelagie (Stretlo di Sicilia). — Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 23: 41–44. Google Scholar

36.

Foxcroft L. C., Richardson D. M. & Wilson J. R. U. 2008: Ornamental plants as invasive aliens: Problems and solutions in Kruger national park, South Africa. —  Environm. Managem. 41: 32–51. Google Scholar

37.

Galasso G. & Banfi E. (ed.) 2010: Notulae ad plantas advenas Longobardiae spectantes: 1 (1–28). Pagine Bot. 34: 19–34. Google Scholar

38.

Gimeno I., Vilà M. & Hulme P. E. 2006: Are islands more susceptible to plant invasion than continents? A test using Oxalis pes-caprae in the western Mediterranean. —  J. Biogeogr. 33: 1559–1565. Google Scholar

39.

GISD. 2016: Global Invasive Species Database. — Published at  http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/ [accessed 1 Feb 2016]. Google Scholar

40.

Greuter W. 2006+: Compositae (pro parte majore). — In: Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.), Compositae. Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ [accessed 10 Nov 2016], Google Scholar

41.

Guidi S., La Mantia T., Lo Cascio P. & Sottile F. 2013: Schede. — Pp. 39–69 in: Frutti dimenticati e biodiversità recuperata. Il germoplasma frutticolo e viticolo delle agricolture tradizionali italiane. Casi studio: Isole della Sicilia, Lombardia, Quademi Natura e Biodiversità n. 5. — Palermo: ISPRA, ARPA Emilia Romagna, ERSAF, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Regione Siciliana. Google Scholar

42.

Hammer K., Laghetti G. & Perrino P. 1997: Proposal to make the island of Linosa (Italy) as a centre for onfarm conservation of plant genetic resources. —  Genet. Resources Crop. Evol. 44: 127–135. Google Scholar

43.

Hulme P., Brundu G., Camarda I., Dalias P., Lambdon P., Lloret F., Médail F., Moragues E., Suehs C., Traveset A., Troumbis A. & Vilà M. 2008: Assessing the risks to Mediterranean islands ecosystems from alien plant introductions. – Pp. 39–56 in: Tokarska-Guzik B., Brock J. H., Brundu G., Child L., Daehler C. C., Pyšek P. (ed.), Plant invasions: human perception, ecological impacts and management. — Leiden: Backhuys. Google Scholar

44.

La Mantia T., Carimi F., Di Lorenzo R. & Pasta S. 2011: The agricultural heritage of Lampedusa (Pelagie Archipelago, South Italy) and its key role for cultivar and wildlife conservation. —  Ital. J. Agron. 6: 106–110. Google Scholar

45.

La Mantia T., Pasta S. & Rühl J. 2009a: Quadro conoscitivo e proposte gestionali relative agli aspetti floristici, vegetazionali e agro-forestali. Piano di Gestione “Isole Pelagie”. POR 1999.IT.16.1.PO.011/1.11/11.2.9/0347, SIC ITA040001 “Isola di Linosa”, SIC ITA040002 “Isole di Lampedusa e Lampione” e ZPS ITA040013 “Arcipelago delle Pelagie-Area marina e terrestre”, POR 1999.IT.16.1.PO.011/1.11/11.2.9/0304, Legambiente-Comitato Regionale Siciliano e Dipartimento di Colture Arboree dell' Università degli Studi di Palermo. — Published at  http://www.artasicilia.eu/old_site/web/pdg_definitivi/definitivi/pdg_isole_pelagie/l_relazioni/ispl_relazione_pdg_conoscitiva.pdf [accessed 10 Nov 2016, 6 Jul 2017]. Google Scholar

46.

La Mantia T., Pasta S. & Rühl J. 2009b: Quadro conoscitivo e proposte gestionali relative agli aspetti floristici, vegetazionali e agro-forestali. Piano di Gestione “Macalube di Aragona”. POR 1999.IT.16.1. PO.011/1.11/11.2.9/0304, Legambiente-Comitato Regionale Siciliano e Dipartimento di Colture Arboree dell' Università degli Studi di Palermo. — Published at  http://www.artasicilia.eu/old_site/web/pdg_definitivi/definitivi/pdg_macalube_aragona/l_relazioni/parte_ l_fase_conoscitiva.pdf [accessed 10 Nov 2016, 6 Jul 2017]. Google Scholar

47.

La Mantia T., Sottile F. & Carimi F. 2013: La frutticoltura delle isole circumsiciliane. — Pp. 25–30 in: Frutti dimenticati e biodiversità recuperata. I1 germoplasma frutticolo e viticolo delle agricolture tradizionali itliane. Casi studio: Isole della Sicilia, Lombardia, Quademi Natura e Biodiversità n. 5. — Palermo: ISPRA, ARPA Emilia Romagna, ERSAF, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Regione Siciliana. Google Scholar

48.

La Mantia T., Sottile F. & Valentini R. 2012: Piccole isole, l'agricoltura che fa bene all'ambiente, da Lampedusa a Lipari, presentiamo un diverso modello di sviluppo economico sostenibile che tiene conto del paesaggio e della tradizione. — Agrisicilia 3: 18–20. Google Scholar

49.

Lambdon P. W. & Hulme P. E. 2006: How strongly do interactions with closely-related native species influence plant invasions? Darwin's naturalization hypothesis assessed on Mediterranean islands. —  J. Biogeogr. 33:1116–1125. Google Scholar

50.

Lambdon P. W., Lloret F. & Hulme P. E. 2008: Do alien plants on Mediterranean islands tend to invade different niches from native species? –  Biol. Invas. 10: 703–716. Google Scholar

51.

Lastrucci L., Calamassi R., Ferretti G., Galasso G. & Foggi B. 2012: Contributo alla conoscenza della flora esotica dell'Isola di Capraia (Arcipelago Toscano, Italia). —  Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Civico Storia Nat. Milano 153: 127–134. Google Scholar

52.

Lavorel S. 1999: Ecological diversity and resilience of Mediterranean vegetation to disturbance. —  Diversity & Distrib. 5: 3–13. Google Scholar

53.

Lazzaro L., Ferretti G., Galasso G., Lastrucci L. & Foggi B. 2013: Contributo alla conoscenza della flora esotica dell'Arcipelago Toscano, Italia. —  Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Civico Storia Nat. Milano 154: 3–24. Google Scholar

54.

Lazzaro L., Ferretti G., Giuliani C. & Foggi B. 2014: A checklist of the alien flora of the Tuscan Archipelago (Italy). —  Webbia 69: 157–176. Google Scholar

55.

Lazzeri V., Mascia F., Sammartino F., Campus G., Caredda A., Carlesi V., Fois M., Gestri G., Mannocci M., Mazzoncini V., Lombraña A. C. & Santinelli M. 2013: Novità floristiche per le regioni Sardegna e Toscana. — Acta Plantarum Notes 2: 42–59. Google Scholar

56.

Lloret F., Médail F., Brundu G., Camarda I., Moragues E., Rita J., Lambdon P. & Hulme P. 2005: Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. —  J. Ecol. 93: 512–520. Google Scholar

57.

Lojacono-Pojero M. 1878: Le Isole Eolie e la loro vegetazione, con enumerazione delle piante spontanee vascolari. — Bologna: Ristampa anastatica, A. Forni Ed. Google Scholar

58.

Mantisi C. 2001: Storia forestale dell' isola di Linosa con brevi note su Linosae Lampione (Arcipelago delle Pelagie — Provincia di Agrigento). — Palermo: Azienda Foreste Demaniali della Regione Siciliana. — Collana Sicilia Foreste 13. Google Scholar

59.

Maugeri G., Ronsisvalle G. A., Leonardi S. & Cafarella N. 1979: La presenza dell'Amarantho-Cyperetum rotundi nella coiture di alcune isole del distretto siculo (Malta, Favignana, Linosa). — Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania, ser. 4, 13: 127–136. Google Scholar

60.

Mazzola P. 1981: Osservazioni su alcune succulente spontaneizzate in Sicilia. — Giorn. Bot. Ital. 115: 407. Google Scholar

61.

Myers J. H., Simberloff D., Kuris A. M. & Carey J. R. 2000: Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. —  Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 316–320. Google Scholar

62.

Nepi C., Peccenini S. & Peruzzi L. (a cura di) 2009: Notulae alla flora esotica d' Italia: 1(1–21). — Inform. Bot. Ital. 41: 359–362. Google Scholar

63.

O'Connor T. G. 1995: Acacia karroo invasion of grassland: environmental and biotic effects influencing seedling emergence and establishment — Oecologia 103: 214–223. Google Scholar

64.

Pasta S. 2002: Appendice I. Elenco aggiomato della flora vascolare. — Pp. 135–148 in: Corti C., Lo Cascio P., Masseti M. & Pasta S. (ed.), Storia naturale delle Isole Pelagie. — Palermo: L' Epos. Google Scholar

65.

Pasta S., Badalamenti E. & La Mantia T. 2012: Acacia cyclops A. Cunn. ex G. Don (Leguminosae) in Italy: first cases of naturalization. — Anales lard. Bot. Madrid 69: 193–200. Google Scholar

66.

Pasta S. & La Mantia T. 2008: Le specie vegetali aliene in alcuni SIC siciliani: analisi del grado di invasività e misure di controllo. Alien plant species in some Sicilian SCI: checking invasive trend and control measures. — P. 79 in: Galasso G., Chiozzi G., Azuma M. & Banfi E. (ed.), Atti Conv. Le specie alloctone in Italia: censimenti, invasività e piani d'azione, Milano, 27–28 Novembre 2008. — Mem. Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Civico Storia Nat. Milano 36(1). Google Scholar

67.

Pasta S. & La Mantia T. 2013: Plant species richness, biogeographic and conservation interest of the vascular flora of the satellite islands of Sicily: patterns, driving forces and threats. — Pp. 201–240 in: Cardona Pons E., Estaun Clariso I., Comas Casademont M. & Fraga i Arguimbau P. (ed.), Proceedings and abstracts of the 2nd Botanical Conference in Menorca Islands and plants: preservation and understanding of flora on Mediterranean Islands, Es Mercadal, 26–30 April 2011. — Menorca: Maó, Institut Menorqui d'Estudis, Consell Insular de Menorca. Google Scholar

68.

Pasta S., La Mantia T., Sottile F., Billeci V., Dimarca A., Maraventano G., Prazzi E., Sorrentino G. 2015: SCHEDE 4 LINOSA — Patrimonio vegetale e agricoltura. — Pp. 42–45 in: Agro B. (ed.), Lampedusa, memoria e storia del paesaggio. — Caltanissetta: Regione Siciliana Assessorato dei Beni Culturali e dell' Identità Siciliana, Dipartimento dei Beni Culturad e dell'Identità Siciliana. Google Scholar

69.

Pasta S., La Rosa A., La Mantia T. & Badalamenti E. 2016: Anredera cordifolia (Ten.) Steenis (Basellaceae): status in Italia e sua espansione in Sicilia occidentale. — Naturalista Sicil., ser. 4, 40: 145–149. Google Scholar

70.

Pignatti S. 1982: Flora D' Italia 1–3. — Bologna: Edagricole. Google Scholar

71.

Pino J., Aman X., Rodrigo A. & Retana J. 2013: Post-fire invasion and subsequent extinction of Conyza spp. in Mediterranean forests is mostly explained by local factors. —  Weed Res. 53: 470–478. Google Scholar

72.

Podda L., Lazzeri V., Mascia F., Mayoral O. & Bacchetta G. 2012: The checklist of the Sardinian alien flora: an update. — Notul. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 40(2): 14–21. Google Scholar

73.

Pretto F., Celesti-Grapow L., Carli E. & Blasi C. 2010: Influence of past land use and current human disturbance on non-native plant species on small Italian islands. —  Pl. Ecol. 210: 225–239. Google Scholar

74.

Reichard S. H. & White P. 2001: Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. —  BioScience 51: 103–113. Google Scholar

75.

Richardson D. M., Pyšek P., Rejmánek M., Barbour M. G., Panetta F. D. & West C. J. 2000: Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. —  Diversity & Distrib. 6: 93–107. Google Scholar

76.

Rossitto M. & Ilardi V. 2000: Note tassonomiche e distributive su Boussingaultia cordifolia (Basellaceae, Magnoliophyta). — Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 9: 207–209. Google Scholar

77.

Shaw J. M. H. 2008: An investigation of the cultivated Kalanchoe daigremontiana group, with a checklist of Kalanchoë cultivars. — Hanburyana 3: 17–79. Google Scholar

78.

Silva V., Figueiredo E. & Smith G. F. 2015: Alien succulents naturalized and cultivated on the central west coast of Portugal. — Bradleya 33: 58–81. Google Scholar

79.

Sottile F., Barone E. & La Mantia T. 2013: Cenni storici sulla frutticoltura delle isole della Sicilia. — Pp. 12–16 in: Frutti dimenticati e biodiversità recuperata. Il germoplasma frutticolo e viticolo delle agricolture tradizionali italiane. Casi studio: Isole della Sicilia, Lombardia, Quaderni Natura e Biodiversità n. 5. — Palermo: ISPRA, ARPA Emilia Romagna, ERSAF, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Regione Siciliana. Google Scholar

80.

Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Chater A. O., Edmonson J. R., Heywood V. H., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), 1993: Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

81.

Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.) 1964–1980: Flora europaea 1–5. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

82.

Verloove F. 2008: Datura wrightii (Solanaceae), a neglected xenophyte, new to Spain. — Bouteloua 4: 37–40. Google Scholar

83.

Vila M., Siamantziouras A. D., Brundu G., Camarda I., Lambdon P., Médail F., Moragues E., Suehs C. M., Traveset A., Troumbis A. Y. & Hulme P. E. 2008: Widespread resistance of Mediterranean island ecosystems to the establishment of three alien species. —  Diversity & Distrib. 14: 839–851. Google Scholar

84.

Walters S. M., Alexander J. C. M., Brady A., Brickell C. D., Cullen J., Green P. S., Heywood V. H., Matthews V. A., Robson N. K. B., Yeo P. F. & Knees S. G. (ed.) 1989: The European garden flora. A manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass, 3: Dicotyledons (Part I: Casuarinaceae to Aristolochiaceae). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

85.

Walters S. M., Brady A., Brickell C. D., Cullen J., Green P. S., Lewis J., Matthews V. A., Webb D. A., Yeo P. F. & Alexander J .C. M. (ed.) 1984: The European garden flora. A manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass, 2: Monocotyledons (Part II: Juncaceae to Orchidaceae). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

86.

Walters S. M., Brady A., Brickell C. D., Cullen J., Green P. S., Lewis J., Matthews V. A., Webb D. A., Yeo P. F. & Alexander J. C. M. (ed.) 1986: The European garden flora. A manual for the identification of plants cultivated in Europe, both out-of-doors and under glass, 1: Pteridophyta; Gymnospermae; Angiospermae — Monocotyledons (Part I: Alismataceae to Iridaceae). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

87.

Ward D. B. 2008: Keys to the flora of Florida: 18, Kalanchoë (Crassulaceae). — Phytologia 90: 41–46. Google Scholar

88.

Williamson M. H. 1996: Biological invasions. — London: Chapman & Hall. Google Scholar
© 2017 The Authors · This open-access article is distributed under the CC BY 4.0 licence
Salvatore Pasta, Nicola M. G. Ardenghi, Emilio Badalamenti, Tommaso La Mantia, Salvatore Livreri Console, and Gilberto Parolo "The alien vascular flora of Linosa (Pelagie Islands, Strait of Sicily): update and management proposals," Willdenowia 47(2), 135-144, (13 July 2017). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.47.47205
Received: 9 February 2017; Accepted: 1 May 2017; Published: 13 July 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top