Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2018 Taxonomic study on the Greek endemic genus Hymenonema (Asteraceae: Cichorieae), using morphological and karyological traits
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Hymenonema is a Greek endemic genus consisting of two species, H. laconicum and H. graecum, occurring in the lowlands of S Peloponnisos and on most of the C Aegean islands, respectively. Morphological investigation of 20 gatherings covering the entire distribution range revealed clear morphological differences between the two species, mainly in pappus, achenes, anther tube, ligules and basal leaf characters. A corresponding emended identification key to the species is given. Karyological investigation of 11 accessions included karyotypes, idiograms and karyological indices for both species. Six karyomorphological parameters were also statistically analysed. Populations with intermediate morphological characters between the two species are recorded for the first time and their relationship with the typical two species is discussed. The geographical distribution of the genus is mapped and doubtful locations are commented on. The cytotaxonomic data and the geographical distribution of the species support the characterization of H. laconicum and H. graecum as schizoendemics. The conservation status of both species is suggested as Vulnerable (VU) according to IUCN criteria.

Introduction

Hymenonema Cass. is one of the seven endemic genera of Greece and the only one that consists of two species, while the rest are monotypic: Horstrissea dolinicola Greuter & al. (Apiaceae), Jankaea heldreichii (Boiss.) Boiss. (Gesneriaceae), Lutzia cretica (L.) Greuter & Burdet (Brassicaceae), Petromarula pinnata A. DC. (Campanulaceae), Phitosia crocifolia (Boiss. & Heldr.) Kamari & Greuter (Asteraceae) and Thamnosciadium junceum (Sm.) Hartvig (Apiaceae) (Phitos & Kamari 2009). Leptoplax emarginata (Boiss.) O. E. Schulz was treated as a Greek endemic genus by Phitos & Kamari (2009), but was more recently included in Bornmuellera Hausskn. (Rešetnik & al. 2013).

Hymenonema laconicum Boiss. & Heldr. occurs in the lowlands of S Peloponnisos and H. graecum DC. on most of the C Aegean islands (Fig. 1). A record for H. graecum from NW Kriti (Crete) (Zaffran 1990: 331) has not recently been reconfirmed. The systematic classification of Hymenonema at the taxonomic level of family and tribe has not changed since the first description of the genus. It was classified by Cassini (1817) in the family Asteraceae and in the tribe Cichorieae (= Lactuceae). At subtribal rank, Hymenonema was placed by Stebbins (1953) in the Cichoriinae together with the genera Arnoseris Gaertn., Catananche L. and Tolpis Adans. Jeffrey (1966) included Hymenonema in the Catananche sub-group, whereas Bremer (1993, 1994) placed it in the subtribe Catananchinae with Catananche and Rothmaleria Font Quer. Recently, Kilian & al. (2009) and Tremetsberger & al. (2013), based on molecular phylogenetic evidence, included Hymenonema in subtribe Scolyminae along with Catananache, Gundelia L. and Scolymus L., while Rothmaleria was placed along with Tolpis in the Cichoriinae.

The combination of the homogamous capitula with 5-dentate, ligulate flowers and the presence of latex easily places Hymenonema among the members of Cichorieae (Kilian & al. 2009). The morphological features that distinguish Hymenonema from the other genera of the Cichorieae are mainly in the shape of the achenes and pappus. Hymenonema together with Catananche are the only genera with the combination of a pappus composed of large scales apically prolonged into bristles, and achenes that are densely appressed pilose. The presence of receptacular paleae in Hymenonema, a character that is considered cardinal for Asteraceae classification, is also observed in some genera such as Crepis L., Hypochaeris L., Rothmaleria and Scolymus (Bremer 1994; Kilian & al. 2009). For this shared character among Hymenonema and the above-mentioned genera, Bremer (1994) supported the hypothesis of plesiomorphy.

According to Kilian & al. (2009), the closest relative of Hymenonema is Scolymus. The two genera share several morphological features, namely: pinnatifid-pinnatisect leaves, involucral bracts in several gradually differing rows, yellow florets, pilose corolla tube, yellow echinolophate pollen grains, long style branches with long hairs, and scabrid-barbellate pappus bristles (Sell 1976a, 1976b; Bremer 1994).

Both Hymenonema graecum and H. laconicum are perennial, robust rosette herbs that usually grow on rocks, in stony places and on roadsides. The rosette leaves are pinnatifid-pinnatisect and hairy. The stems are unbranched or have few branches terminating in a capitulum. The involucral bracts are arranged in several imbricate rows and have a scarious margin. The achenes are obconic, pilose, unbeaked, with five ribs, and the pappus consists of linear-lanceolate scales (Sell 1976a; Bremer 1994). The width of the terminal segment of the basal leaves and the morphology of the receptacle and the pappus have played a major role in the distinction of the two species of Hymenonema (Sell 1976a).

Karyological data combined with morphology and geographical distribution were first used in the taxonomy of the Cichorieae by Stebbins (1953). The ancestral basic chromosome number of the tribe (and Asteraceae in general) has been assumed to be x = 9 (Stebbins & al. 1953; Wagenitz 1976; Tomb 1977; Tomb & al. 1978). According to Turner & al. (1961), the basic number is x = 5 (or 4) as a result of an aneuploid reduction from the tetraploid level, which was suggested as an explanation for the frequent gaps in the series between x = 4, 5 and x = 8, 9. However, the numbers in Cichorieae known today do not exhibit such gaps and also x = 9 is the number present in most genera and subtribes. The hypothesis of x = 9 is assumed more parsimonious (Kilian & al. 2009).

The Scolyminae (Catananche, Gundelia, Hymenonema and Scolymus) have two basic chromosome numbers: x = 9 and x = 10. The genera Catananche and Gundelia share the basic chromosome number x = 9 and the species are usually diploid (Catananche: Stebbins & al. 1953; Reese 1957; Delay 1967, 1968; Love & Kjellqvist 1974; Humphries & al. 1978; Natarajan 1978; Blanca López 1981; Molero & Montserrat Marti 1986; Mejías & Luque 1987; Verlaque & al. 1987; Galland 1988; Gemeinholzer & Faustmann 2005; Garcia & al. 2013; Gundelia: Waisel 1962; Brullo & Pavone 1978; Devesa 1980; Lack & al. 1980; Al-Taey & Hossain 1984; Ghaffari & Chariat-Panahi 1985; Nersesyan & Nazarova 1989; Nazarova & Gukasian 1990; Ghukasyan & Janjughazyan 2015). Only in Catananche has polyploidy been observed (2n = 4x = 36; Oberprieler & Vogt 1993). The other two genera of the subtribe, Hymenonema and Scolymus, share the basic chromosome number x = 10 (Hymenonema: Iatrou 1986; Tan & al. 2001; Liveri & al. 2014; Strid 2015; Scolymus: Murin & Sheikh 1971; Tomb & al. 1978; Kuzmanov & al. 1986, 1991; Oberprieler & Vogt 1994 and references therein; Gemeinholzer & Faustmann 2005).

Despite the great interest in the tribal and/or subtribal classification of Asteraceae, the Greek endemic genus Hymenonema has never been studied sufficiently. The morphological diversity of H. graecum observed during field work, the restricted distribution area and the inadequate data available for the genus led us to the present study. This is the first attempt to establish a broader framework on the phylogeny of the genus, in which molecular data will be included. Morphological characters play a major role in the preparation of classification systems, diagnostic keys, etc. (Sharma 2009), while karyological data significantly contribute to the understanding of evolutionary relationships (Peruzzi & Altinordu 2014). Thus, karyological and morphological features are used to create a taxonomic framework. The main goals of the present work are (1) to evaluate the taxonomic status of Hymenonema and (2) to determine the morphological and karyological diversity of the genus. In a follow-up study, the morphological and karyological data will be combined with molecular data to investigate phylogeny, speciation and biogeography of Hymenonema.

Material and methods

Plant material of Hymenonema was collected during field work in 2013 and 2014. Herbarium specimens of all collected populations are deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Patras (UPA). Additional Hymenonema material was studied from UPA and from digital images of the following herbaria: ATH, ATHU, B, GZU, K, LD, P, S, W and WU (herbarium codes according to Thiers 2017+).

Table 1.

The main morphological differences between Hymenonema laconicum and the typical and non-typical forms of H. graecum.

t01_01.gif

We examined morphologically the two Hymenonema species from 20 localities, 14 for H. graecum from seven islands of the Kiklades (Anafi, Andros, Kithnos, Mikonos, Serifos, Siros and Tinos) and six for H. laconicum from S Peloponnisos (Mt Parnonas and Mt Taigetos). The main morphological features measured were: stem height, width of rosette leaves and width of their terminal segment, length of cilia of receptacular pits, achene size, and pappus length (Table 1). Also, qualitative differences between the taxa were examined concerning shape of rosette leaves, ligule colour, anther tube (indumentum and colour) and its apical appendage, achene indumentum, and uniformity and colour of pappus.

Living plants from 11 different localities were cultivated in the experimental garden of the Botanical Institute, University of Patras, for karyological studies. These populations are indicated by an asterisk (*) in the specimen list (see Appendix).

The chromosome measurements were obtained from root-tip metaphases, using the squash technique (Östergren & Heneen 1962; Kamari 1976). Root tips were pre-treated for six hours in a mixture of 1:1 8-hydroxyquinoline (0.3 g/l):colchicine 0.2% w/v and followed by fixation in Carnoy [3:1 (v/v) absolute ethanol:glacial acetic acid] for 24 hours at 0–4 °C. Afterwards, they were hydrolysed in 1N HCl for 12 minutes at 60 °C and placed in Feulgen's stain (Darlington & La Cour 1969) for about three hours. At least five metaphase plates of each population were examined and indices were calculated with Microsoft Excel (2007) and PAST (version 3.14, Hammer & al. 2001). Chromosome terminology follows Levan & al. (1964), Stebbins (1971) and Kamari (1976), taking into consideration comments and suggestions by Sybenga (1959), Bentzer & al. (1971) and Favarger (1978). For each taxon, the karyotype formula, maximum and minimum length of chromosomes, total chromosome length (TCL) and average chromosome length (ACL), along with their standard deviation (SD) are given. Moreover, r-index, R-length, centromeric index and arm difference ratio for the chromosome pairs of both taxa are estimated. The interchromosomal and intrachromosomal asymmetry are given estimating the Coefficient of Variation of Chromosome Length (CVCL; Paszko 2006; Watanabe & al. 1999) and the Mean Centromeric Asymmetry (MCA; Peruzzi & Eroğlu 2013; Peruzzi & Altinordu 2014), respectively. Additionally, the Coefficient of Variation of Centromeric Index (CVCI) measuring the centromere position heterogeneity is estimated following Paszko (2006) and Peruzzi & Altinordu (2014). A multivariate analysis (Principal Coordinate Analysis, PCoA) was made for six karyological parameters: 2n, x, THL (Total Haploid Length), CVCL, CVCI and MCA (Peruzzi & - Altinordu 2014; Samaropoulou & al. 2016).

Results

Hymenonema Cass, in Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1817: 34. 1817. — Type (designated by Pfeiffer 1875: 1707): Catananche graeca L. (= H. graecum (L.) DC.).

Description — Herbs perennial, rosette-forming. Stems solitary to few, branched, with glandular and longer, eglandular hairs. Leaves pinnatifid-pinnatisect with dense, appressed, rigid, glandular and longer, eglandular hairs. Cauline leaves resembling rosette leaves or bractlike. Capitula 1 to c. 20 per individual. Involucral bracts in several imbricate rows, greenish in middle with scarious margin. Receptacle paleate, pitted, with awned scales peripherally. Receptacular paleae membranous. Ligules bright yellow or orange-yellow, 5-dentate. Achenes obconic, 5-angled, appressed pilose. Pappus of up to 15 linear-lanceolate, awned scales.

Key to the species of Hymenonema

1. Ligules orange-yellow usually with a dark purple spot at base; anther tube dark purple throughout and densely hairy; achenes brown, densely hairy; pappus of awned scales varying in length, shortest ones 2–10 mm long, longest ones 15–18.6 mm long 1. H. laconicum

— Ligules yellow; anther tube yellow or sometimes purple, with yellow apical appendage and ± sparsely hairy; achenes light brown, ± sparsely hairy; pappus of awned scales, ± equal in length, 10–14.5 mm long 2. H. graecum

1. Hymenonema laconicum Boiss. & Heldr. in Boissier, F1. Orient. 3: 715. 1875. — Lectotype (designated by Tan in Tan & al. 2001: 389): [Greece, Peloponnisos] “ad radices montis Malevo pr[ope] Platanos”, Orphanides Flora Graeca Exsiccata no. 1152 (G-BOIS; isolectotypes: P 02831038, WU 0077308). — Fig. 2.

Catananche graeca sensu Bory & Chaub., Nouv. F1. Pélop.: 55. 1838, non L.

DescriptionStem 30–77 cm tall. Rosette leaves 10-25(-30) × 2.4-6.2 cm, pinnatifid with dentate, lobed segments; terminal segment (9-) 15-35 mm wide, larger than lateral segments. Capitula (1-)5-15(—20) per individual. Involucre 14-25 × 15-26 mm at anthesis; bracts 28–54, in several imbricate rows, ovate to oblong, glabrous, with a distinct scarious margin 1–3 mm wide and an acute apex. Receptacular pits with unequal cilia, to 1 mm long. Ligules orange-yellow, usually with a purple spot at base; tube to 15 mm long; limb to 25 × 5 mm. Anther tube dark purple, to 8 mm long, densely hairy, with triangular apical appendages of same colour. Style to 23 mm long. Achenes brown, 4.7-6 × 1.4-2 mm, 5-ribbed, punctate, densely hairy with rigid, appressed hairs. Pappus with pale straw-coloured, awned scales, distal 1/3 dark purple; scales in 1 row, strongly varying in length, shortest ones 2–10 mm long, longest ones 15–18.6 mm long.

Fig. 1.

Distribution map of the genus Hymenonema H. laconicum (circles), typical form of H. graecum (triangles), non-typical form of H. graecum (squares). Solid symbols refer to specimens seen (see Appendix), open symbols refer to literature references.

f01_01.jpg

Fig. 2.

Hymenonema laconicum — A: individual; B: capitulum; C: involucre. — Photographs: A: village of Geraki, 7 Jun 2009, G. Kofinas; B: near town of Sparti, 21 May 2017, G. Kofinas; C: village of Krokees, 25 May 2014, E. Liveri (Liveri & Kofinas 131, UPA).

f02_01.jpg

Table 2.

Karyomorphometric data on Hymenonema laconicum. —l = length of long arm; s = length of short arm; SD = standard deviation; Sn = sum length of haploid chromosome set.

t02_01.gif

Chromosome number — 2n = 2x = 20.

Phenology — Flowering from May to July; fruiting from June to August.

Distribution — S Peloponnisos, in the lowlands surrounding Mt Parnonas, Mt Taigetos and (unconfirmed) Mt Menalo (Fig. 1).

Ecology — Dry slopes, abandoned terraces in Quercus-Pistacia scrub, roadsides, olive groves, on limestone, at altitudes of (5-)20-800(-1300) m (Fig. 2A).

Karyology — Karyotype formula: 2n = 16m + 2sm + 2sm-SAT = 20 chromosomes.

The karyotype of Hymenonema laconicum is diploid and symmetrical. It consists of 16 metacentric chromosomes, two submetacentric chromosomes, which are the fifth pair from largest, and two submetacentric, satellited chromosomes, which are the smallest pair (Fig. 5A, B). The size of chromosomes varies between 1.80–3.32 µm and the average chromosome length equals 2.61 µm. THL and TCL equal 26.06 µm and 52.11 µm, respectively. The interchromosomal asymmetry index (CVCL) is estimated at 13.61 and the intrachromosomal (MCA) at 11.15. The index related to centromere position heterogeneity (CVCI) equals 11.05. The morphometric data of H. laconicum are given in Table 2.

All the material studied here was collected from the lowlands of Mt Parnonas and Mt Taigetos, and the exact locations are provided in the specimen list (see Appendix) indicated with an asterisk. The chromosome number 2n = 20 has also been reported in material from Mt Parnonas and Mt Taigetos (Iatrou 1986; Tan & al. 2001) and from the Langada gorge in Mt Taigetos (Liveri & al. 2014).

Conservation status — No protection status is known until now; the species was only included in the directive for threatened taxa according to the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC 2013). However, Hymenonema laconicum is found in four protected sites of the NATURA 2000 network (Mt Parnonas: GR2520005, GR2520006; Mt Taigetos: GR2550006, GR2550009). For the protected area GR2520006 (Mt Parnonas) the presence of H. laconicum is characterized as very rare and for GR2550006 (Mt Taigetos) the population size was counted as 100-250 individuals by the NATURA 2000 network (standard data forms available at  http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=GR2520006 and  http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=GR2550006, respectively). Based on our field observations most of the subpopulations of H. laconicum examined do not exceed 100 mature individuals each. The notably small number of mature individuals in each subpopulation lead us to assess H. laconicum as Vulnerable (VU) according to criteria C2a(i) of the IUCN (2016).

Fig. 3.

Hymenonema graecum — A: individuals of typical form; B: capitulum of typical form; C: involucre of typical form; D: capitulum of non-typical form; E: involucre of non-typical form. — Photographs: A, C: Kithnos island, 20 May 2007, G. Kamari (Phitos & Kamari 27334, herb. Phitos & Kamari); B, D: Tinos island, 18 Jul 2014, E. Liveri (Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 121, UPA); E: Siros island, 15 Jul 2013, E. Liveri (Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 110, UPA).

f03_01.jpg

2. Hymenonema graecum (L.) DC., Prodr. 7: 116. 1838 ≡ Catananche graeca L., Sp. Pl. 2: 813. 1753 ≡ Scorzonera elongata Willd., Sp. Pl. 3: 1508. 1803, nom. illeg. (McNeill & al. 2012: Art. 52.1) ≡ Hymenonema tournefortii Cass, in Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat., ed. 2, 22: 316. 1821, nom. illeg. (Art. 52.1). — Lectotype (designated by Turland in Jarvis & Turland 1998: 356): [icon] “Scorzonera Graeca saxatalis [sic!] et maritima, foliis varie laciniatis” in Tournefort, Rel. Voy. Levant., ed. Paris, 1: t. facing p. 223. 1717.—Fig. 3. — “Scorzonera graeca Hort.” (Steudel, Nomencl. Bot, ed. 2, 2: 546. 1841), nom. inval. (Art. 36.1(c)).

Table 3.

Karyomorphometric data on typical form of Hymenonema graecum. —l = length of long arm; s = length of short arm; SD = standard deviation; Sn = sum length of haploid chromosome set.

t03_01.gif

Table 4.

Karyomorphometric data on non-typical form of Hymenonema graecum. —l = length of long arm; s = length of short arm; SD = standard deviation; Sn = sum length of haploid chromosome set.

t04_01.gif

Table 5.

Karyomorphometric indices of the two Hymenonema species: chromosome number (2n), karyotype formula, maximum (max l+s) and minimum (min l+s) chromosome length, total haploid chromosome length (THL), total (TCL) and average (ACL) chromosome length (SD = standard deviation), and karyotype asymmetry indices (MCA, CVCL and CVCI).

t05_01.gif

DescriptionStem 14–67 cm tall. Rosette leaves 3.2-25(-35.4) × 1.2-5(-6.9) cm, pinnatifid with dentate, lobed segments; terminal segment 3-15(-21) mm wide, larger than lateral segments. Capitula 1-5(-15) per individual. Involucre 15-26 × 10-24 mm at anthesis; bracts 24–50, in several imbricate rows, ovate to oblong, glabrous, with a distinct scarious margin 0.8–2.5 mm wide and an acute apex. Receptacular pits with unequal cilia to 0.5 mm long. Ligules yellow; tube to 11 mm long; limb to 18 × 4 mm. Anther tube yellow, to 6 mm long, sparsely hairy, with triangular apical appendages of same colour. Style to 14 mm long. Achenes light brown, 35-5.4 × 0.8-1.8 mm, 5-ribbed, punctate, ± sparsely hairy with rigid, appressed hairs. Pappus of pale straw-coloured, awned scales, in 1 row, ± equal in length, 10–14.5 mm long.

Chromosome number — - 2n = 2x = 20.

Phenology — Flowering from May to July; fruiting from June to the beginning of September.

Distribution — Kiklades and (unconfirmed) NW Kriti (Fig. 1).

Ecology — Growing in garigue, phrygana, stony places, cliffs, roadsides, residential areas, mostly on limestone, also on schistose and granitic substrate, margins of coastal saline ground, at altitudes of 0–450 m (Fig. 3A).

Morphological variation — -During the field work we observed that some individuals (Tinos) or even a whole population (Siros) of Hymenonema graecum (Fig. 1) have some morphological features resembling H. laconicum. This non-typical H. graecum has a purple anther tube as in H. laconicum but with a yellow apical appendage (Fig. 4E) and the achenes (Fig. 4F) are intermediate in indumentum between those of H. graecum and H. laconicum. With respect to the other characters, the non-typical plants largely match typical H. graecum (Table 1). This non-typical form of H. graecum has been observed on three islands: Mikonos, Siros and Tinos. On Mikonos, specimens (at LD) from two different localities were examined, and the plants belong to the non-typical form of H. graecum. On Siros, all the localities examined had plants belonging to the non-typical form of H. graecum. On Tinos, all the localities examined had both forms of H. graecum. On the islands of Anafi, Andros, Kithnos and Serifos, all the populations were of typical H. graecum.

Karyology — Karyotype formula: 2n = 18m + 2m-SAT = 20 chromosomes.

All the populations of Hymenonema graecum are found to be diploid having a symmetrical karyotype, with 20 metacentric chromosomes. The smallest chromosome pair bears well-observed satellites (Fig. 5C, D). This satellited pair shows structural heterogeneity with one metacentric and one submetacentric homologue in material collected from Kithnos island. The chromosome size ranges from 2.21–4.27 µm. The average chromosome length is 3.39 µm, the total chromosome length is 67.81 µm and for the haploid series is 33.91 µm. The asymmetry indices, CVCL and MCA, equal 16.25 and 11.86, respectively. The coefficient of variation of centromeric index is estimated to 11.27. The morphometric data of the typical H. graecum are given in Table 3.

Fig. 4.

Morphological differences of achene and anther tube of Hymenonema. -A, B: H. laconicum (Kyriakopoulos 1524, herb. Phi tos & Kamari); C, D: typical form of H. graecum (Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 100, UPA); E, F: non-typical form of H. graecum (Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 107, UPA). — Scale bars = 1 mm.

f04_01.jpg

Individuals of the non-typical form of Hymenonema graecum were also examined karyologically, and the results show similar karyotype morphology to the typical form (Fig. 5E). The morphometric data from these populations were calculated separately in order to find possible variations (Table 4). The karyotype formula of non-typical H. graecum is: 2n = 18m + 2m-SAT = 20 chromosomes (Fig. 5F). The chromosome size varies from 2.314.11 µm, while the average chromosome length is 3.29 µm. THL and TCL equal 32.95 µm and 65.89 µm, respectively. MCA is estimated at 13.27, CVCL at 15.63 and CVCI at 10.37. The morphometric data of the non-typical H. graecum are given in Table 4.

Fig. 5.

Karyotype and idiogram of Hymenonema. — A, B: H. laconicum (Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 124, UPA); C, D: typical form of H. graecum (Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 100, UPA); E, F: non-typical form of H. graecum (Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 107, UPA). — Scale bars = 10 µm.

f05_01.jpg

The chromosome number 2n = 20, found here, is in accordance with previous references based on material from Kithnos (Liveri & al. 2014), Naxos and Schinousa (Strid 2015). There is also one reference of the same chromosome number (Iatrou 1986), but the locality of the material is not mentioned.

The karyomorphometric indices of Hymenonema laconicum and H. graecum (typical and non-typical) are given in Table 5.

Conservation statusHymenonema graecum is protected by Greek Presidential Decree 67/1981 (1981) on the protection of the native flora and wild fauna of Greece and was also included in the directive for threatened taxa according to the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC 2013). Populations of H. graecum are found in five protected sites of the NATURA 2000 network (Anafi: GR422002; Iraklia, Schinousa and nearby islands/islets: GR4220013; Naxos: GR4220014; Poliegos-Kimolos: GR422006; Santorini: GR4220003). The examined subpopulations of H. graecum do not exceed more than 100 mature individuals each. Only on Tinos island does the sub-population occurring close to the villages of Arnados, Dio Choria and Monastiri comprise more than 100 mature individuals. The species distribution includes almost all the Kiklades islands and islets reaching an extent of occurrence a little more than 2500 km2. However, in view of the severe fragmentation of its distribution area and the continuous decline of its habitats, we assess the species as Vulnerable (VU) according to criteria Blab(iii); C2a(ii) of the IUCN (2016).

Discussion

For this study, the geographical distribution of Hymenonema (Fig. 1) is presented in detail (see Appendix). Hymenonema graecum is distributed at most of the islands and islets of the Kiklades, but there are also two references from Kriti and Turkey. The presence of H. graecum in NW Kriti was referred by Raulin (1869: 493) and Bois sier (1875: 715) and it was later confirmed by Zaffran (1990: 331). Since then, several botanists (N. Turland, pers. com.) searched for the plant without success at the locality mentioned by Zaffran (“à la périphérie du terrain salé au fond de la baie de Souda”). It should be noted that this area has been occupied for military purposes since 1951–1952. Now, it is the location of three major military installations and so access is strictly restricted. Concerning the presence of H. graecum in Turkey, one specimen from Herb. Heldreich was mentioned by Boissier (1875: 715) collected from the region “Byzantium”. One additional reference from the Flora of Turkey (Matthews 1975: 626), from Istanbul, based on collections by Cadet de Fontaney also in Herb. Heldreich, is presumably wrong. The two references most likely refer to the same specimen, which was probably a cultivated specimen. Therefore, in Euro+Med (2006+), the presence of II. graecum in Turkey as well as in Kriti is considered questionable.

Fig. 6.

PCoA analysis based on six quantitative karyological parameters of Hymenonema - H. laconicum (•), typical form of II. graecum (▴), non-typical form of H. graecum ( ▪ ).

f06_01.jpg

There is also a reference of Hymenonema laconicum from Mt Menalo (Halácsy 1902: 173), with a herbarium specimen of Sartori, which, however, has not recently been confirmed.

The previous identification keys for the species of Hymenonema were based mainly on the width of the terminal segment of the basal leaves and the uniformity of the pappus (Sell 1976a). According to our results, the width of the terminal segment in contrast to the pappus structure is not a reliable diagnostic character. Moreover, new diagnostic features were observed: colour of ligules, colour and indumentum of anther tube, and indumentum of achenes (Fig. 4). It is noteworthy that the purple spot at the base of the ligules, which was mentioned for H. graecum in Flora europaea (Sell 1976a), is observed only on the ligules of H. laconicum. Additionally, Strid (2016) stated that the colour of the anther tube of H. graecum is orange-brown. We assume that the mentioned plants belong to the non-typical H. graecum. Also, the genus description by Sell (1976a) does not specify if the number of capitula (1–3) is per stem or per individual. However, we have counted in H. laconicum (1-)5-15(-20) and in H. graecum 1-5(-15) capitula per individual (Fig. 2A, 3A).

The main morphological differences between Hymenonema laconicum and H. graecum, presented in Table 1, support that they are two clearly separated species. Individuals or whole populations of H. graecum with intermediate morphological characters, characterized by purple anther tubes with a yellow appendage, are here reported for the first time. In this study, we define the above-mentioned form of H. graecum as non-typical. The typical form with the yellow anther tube and other morphological differences (Table 1, Fig. 3, 4) agrees with the description by Candolle (1838: 116), which refers to “capitula magna flava”. The lectotype illustration (Tournefort 1717: t. facing p. 223), although it does not show the colour of the anther tube, resembles the form of H. graecum with the yellow anther tube.

A karyomorphological analysis of the genus Hymenonema, including populations from the most of its distribution area, is carried out for the first time. The karyotypes of H. laconicum and II. graecum show low intrachromosomal (MCA) and interchromosomal (CVCL) asymmetry, as was expected from the predominance of metacentric chromosomes and the similar chromosome size. The heterogeneity of the centromere position (CVC1) is also low for both species. The above-mentioned indices are slightly higher for typical H. graecum. The karyological parameters concerning the chromosome length (THL, TCL, ACL) were also higher for H. graecum. The intrachromosomal asymmetry for non-typical H. graecum is even higher compared to the typical H. graecum, while the CVC1 is smaller than H. laconicum (Table 5). The karyological parameters about chromosome length (THL, TCL, ACL) for non-typical H. graecum are intermediate between the two species. Statistical analysis (PCoA; Fig. 6) of the six karyological parameters according to the method proposed by Peruzzi & Altinordu (2014) does not provide additional data to understand the relationships between these taxa. The accessions of the examined taxa overlap and no clear group is created.

Cytotaxonomic data have been used to explain the origin and evolutionary trends of endemics (Favarger & Contandriopoulos 1961; Favarger 1969; Favarger & Siljak-Yakovlev 1986; Siljak-Yakovlev & Peruzzi 2012). Based on our karyological data, Hymenonema species are characterized as schizoendemics. Hymenonema laconicum and H. graecum share the same chromosome number, show similar morphological features and occur in different but close geographical areas. The evidence from the current study strongly supports the hypothesis of schizoendemism.

For Hymenonema, there is insufficient data to prove whether the differentiation of the two species started before or after the geographical isolation. However, the finding of the intermediate form of H. graecum suggests complex speciation events that occur in the Aegean archipelago.

The presence of intermediate plants between the two species may imply hybridization. Examples of hybridization between plant species have been studied extensively in the Aegean area, such as the Crepis neglecta L. complex (Kamari 1976). However, in this case the scenario of hybridization does not seem reasonable, since the non-typical Hymenonema graecum has not been found in the middle of the distribution areas of the two species, i.e. in the W Kiklades (Kimolos, Kithnos, Milos, Serifos and Sifnos). On the contrary, non-typical H. graecum occurs on Mikonos, Siros, Tinos (N Kiklades) and probably on Naxos (C Kiklades; Strid 2016). Finding the non-typical H. graecum is an interesting element in the evolutionary process of the genus, but still more populations from different islands need to be examined.

In conclusion, the karyological and morphological data provide a sufficient taxonomic framework for Hymenonema. The new findings of the current study contribute to a better understanding of the genus. The provided data combined with a molecular approach might elucidate the phylogenetic relationships between the species of Hymenonema, as well as with its closest genera.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues (Assist. Prof. A. Tiniakou, Dr K. Kougioumoutzis, Ch. Kyriakopoulos and G. Kofinas) and all the others who kindly offered material and photographs. We express our sincere thanks to V. Ketsilis-Rinis for his company and help during field work and to our colleague N. Turland for his help in the typification of the genus. Also, many thanks to Prof. Emer. D. Phitos for his invaluable help. Finally, we would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments, suggestions and corrections on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Al-Taey R. A. & Hossain M. 1984: Studies in Gundelia: 1. A new species from Iraq. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 42: 39–44. Google Scholar

  2. Bentzer B., Bothmer R. von, Engstrand L., Gustavsson M. & Snogerup S. 1971: Some sources of error in the determinations of arm ratios of chromosomes. — Bot. Notiser 124: 65–74. Google Scholar

  3. Blanca López G. 1981: Notas cariosistematicas en el género Centaurea L. sect. Willkommia G. Blanca. II. Conclusiones. — Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 38: 109–125. Google Scholar

  4. Boissier E. 1875: Flora orientalis, sive enumeratio plantarum in oriente a Graecia et Aegypto ad Indiae fines hucusque observatarum 3. Calyciflorae gamopetalae. — Genevae, Basileae & Lugduni: H. Georg. Google Scholar

  5. Bremer K. 1993: New subtribes of the Lactuceae (Asteraceae). —  Novon 3: 328–330. Google Scholar

  6. Bremer K. 1994: Asteraceae: cladistics and classification. — Portland: Timber Press. Google Scholar

  7. Brullo S. & Pavone P. 1978: Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 464–483. — Inform. Bot. Ital. 10: 248–265. Google Scholar

  8. Candolle A. P. 1838: Sistens Compositarum tribus ultimas et ordinis Mantissam. — Pp. 1–330 in: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, sive enumeratio contracta ordinum, generum, specierumque plantarum huc usque cognitarum, juxta methodi naturalis normas digesta 7. — Parisiis: Treuttel et Würtz. Google Scholar

  9. Cassini H. 1817: Aperçu des genres nouveaux, formes par M. Henri Cassini dans la famille des Synthérées. Quatriéme fascicule. — Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 34: 66–70. Google Scholar

  10. Darlington C. D. & La Cour L. 1969: The handling of chromosomes. — London: George Allen and Unwin. Google Scholar

  11. Delay J. 1967: Halophytes I. — Inform. Annuelles Caryosyst. Cytogén. 1: 11–14. Google Scholar

  12. Delay J. 1968: Orophytes d'Europe meridionale. — Inform. Annuelles Caryosyst. Cytogén. 2: 13–16. Google Scholar

  13. Devesa J. A. 1980: Números cromosómicos para la flora española. 84–120. — Lagascalia 9: 249–284. Google Scholar

  14. Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated] : Euro+Med PlantBase — the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. — Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/[accessed Jan 2017]. Google Scholar

  15. Favarger C. 1969: L'endemisme en géographie botanique. — Scientia 104: 1–16. Google Scholar

  16. Favarger C. 1978: Philosophie des comptages de chromosome. —  Taxon 27: 441–448. Google Scholar

  17. Favarger C. & Contrandriopoulos J. 1961: Essai sur l'endémisme. — Bull. Soc. Bot. Suisse 71: 383–408. Google Scholar

  18. Favarger C. & Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1986: À propos de la classification des taxons endémiques basée sur la cytotaxonomie et la cytogénétique. —  Bull. Soc. Bot. France, Actual. Bot.133(Suppl. 1): 287–303. Google Scholar

  19. Galland N. 1988: Recherche sur l'origine de la flore orophile du Maroc étude caryologique et cytogéographique. — Trav. Inst. Sci. Univ. Mohammed V, Sér. Bot. 35: 1–168. Google Scholar

  20. Garcia S., Hidalgo O., Jakovljevic I., Siljak-Yakovlev S., Vigo J., Garnatje T. & Vallès J. 2013: New data on genome size in 128 Asteraceae species and subspecies, with first assessments for 40 genera, 3 tribes and 2 subfamilies. —  P1. Biosyst. 147: 1219–1227. Google Scholar

  21. Gemeinholzer B. & Faustmann I. 2005: New chromosome counts for some Lactuceae (Compositae). — Compositae Newslett. 42: 43–46. Google Scholar

  22. Ghaffari S. M. & Chariat-Panahi M. S. 1985: Chromosome counts of some angiosperms from Iran. — Iran. J. Bot. 3: 67–73. Google Scholar

  23. Ghukasyan A. & Janjughazyan K. 2015: Chromosome numbers of some rare flowering plants of Armenian flora. — National Academy of Sciences of RA [Republic of Armenia], Electronic Journal of Natural Sciences, Botany 1(24): 23–26. Google Scholar

  24. Greek Presidential Decree 67/1981. 1981: Concerning the protection of wild flora and fauna and the definition of the coordinated procedure and control of their research. — Official Gazette of the Hellenic Republic, Issue 1, No. 23: 214–223. Google Scholar

  25. Halácsy E. de 1902: Conspectus florae Graecae 2. — Lipsiae:  Guilelmi EngelmannGoogle Scholar

  26. Hammer Ø., Harper D. A. T. & Ryan P. D. 2001: PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. — Palaeontol. Electronica 4(1): article 4 [1–9]. — Published at  http://palaeoelectronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01 .htm  Google Scholar

  27. Humphries C. J., Murray B. G., Bocquet G. & Vasudevan K. N. 1978: Chromosome numbers of phanerogams from Morocco and Algeria. — Bot. Notiser 131: 391–404. Google Scholar

  28. Iatrou G. 1986: Contribution to the study of endemism of the flora of Peloponnisos [in Greek with English summary]. — Patras: Ph.D. thesis, University of Patras. Google Scholar

  29. IUCN 2016: Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 12. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. — Published at  http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/redlistguidelines.pdf [accessed Feb 2017]. Google Scholar

  30. Jarvis C. E. & Turland N. J. (ed.) 1998: Typification of Linnaean specific and varietal names in the Compositae (Asteraceae). —  Taxon 47: 347–370. Google Scholar

  31. Jeffrey C. 1966: Notes on Compositae, I: The Cichorieae in East Tropical Africa. —  Kew Bull. 18: 427–486. Google Scholar

  32. Kamari G. 1976: Cytotaxonomic study of the Crepis neglecta L. complex in Greece [in Greek with English summary]. — Patras: Ph.D. thesis, University of Patras. Google Scholar

  33. Kilian N., Gemeinholzer B. & Lack H. W. 2009: Cichorieae. — Pp. 343–383 in: Funk V. A., Susanna A., Stuessy T. F. & Bayer R. J. (ed.), Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of the Compositae. — Vienna: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. Google Scholar

  34. Kuzmanov B. A., Georgieva S. B. & Nikolova V. A. 1986: Chromosome numbers of Bulgarian flowering plants. I. Fam. Asteraceae. — Fitologija 31: 71–74. Google Scholar

  35. Kuzmanov B. A., Georgieva S. B. & Nikolova V. A. 1991: Karyological study of Bulgarian plants from the family Compositae. IV. Tribus Cardueae Cass. — Fitologija 39: 3–22. Google Scholar

  36. Lack H. W., Hartmut E. & Straka H. 1980: Die Gattung Rothmaleria Font Quer (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). —  Willdenowia 10: 37–49. Google Scholar

  37. Levan A., Fredga K. & Sandberg A. A. 1964: Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. —  Hereditas 52: 201–220. Google Scholar

  38. Liveri E., Bareka P. & Kamari G. 2014: Reports (1824–1825). — Pp. 274–276 in: Kamari G., Blanché C. & Siljak-Yakovlev S. (ed.), Mediterranean chromosome number reports — 24. —  F1. Medit. 24: 273–291. Google Scholar

  39. Löve Á. & Kjellqvist E. 1974: Cytotaxonomy of Spanish plants. IV. Dicotyledons: Caesalpinaceae-Asteraceae. — Lagascalia 4: 153–211. Google Scholar

  40. Matthews V. A. 1975: Hymenonema Cass. — Pp. 625–626 in: Davis P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 5. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

  41. McNeill J., Barrie F. R., Buck W. R., Demoulin V., Greuter W., Hawks worth D. L., Herendeen P. S., Knapp S., Marhold K., Prado J., Prud'homme van Reine W. F., Smith G. F., Wiersema J. H. & Turland N. J. 2012: International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. — Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. — Regnum Veg. 154. Google Scholar

  42. Mejias J. A. & Luque T. 1987: Números cromosomáticos de plantas occidentales, 403–410. — Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 43: 412–416. Google Scholar

  43. Molero J. & Montserrat Marti J. M. 1986: Numeros cromosomaticos de plantas Marroquies. — Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 16: 351–354. Google Scholar

  44. Murin A. & Sheikh M. Y. 1971: Reports. — Pp. 353 in: Löve Á. (ed.) IOPB chromosome number reports. XXXII. —  Taxon 20: 349–356. Google Scholar

  45. Natarajan G. 1978: Reports. — Pp. 526–531 in: Löve Á. (ed.) IOPB chromosome number reports LXII. —  Taxon 27: 519–535. Google Scholar

  46. Nazarova E. A. & Gukasian A. G. 1990: Gundelia. — P. 165 in: Takhtajan A. (ed.), Numeri chromosomatum Magnoliophytorum Florae URSS, Aceraceae-Menyanthaceae. — Leninopoli: Nauka. Google Scholar

  47. Nersesyan A. A. & Nazarova E. A. 1989: Karyosystematic study of Gundelia tournefortii (Asteraceae). — Bot. Žhum. (Moscow & Leningrad) 74: 837–839. Google Scholar

  48. Oberprieler C. & Vogt R. 1993: Chromosome numbers of North African phanerogams. II. —  Willdenowia 23: 211–238. Google Scholar

  49. Oberprieler C. & Vogt R. 1994: Reports (294–312). — Pp. 262–269 in: Kamari G., Felber F. & Garbari F. (ed.), Mediterranean chromosome number reports, 4. —  F1. Medit. 4: 233–301. Google Scholar

  50. Östergren G. & Heneen W. K. 1962: A squash technique for chromosome morphological studies. —  Hereditas 48: 332–341. Google Scholar

  51. Paszko A. 2006: A critical review and a new proposal of karyotype asymmetry indices. —  P1. Syst. Evol. 258: 39–48. Google Scholar

  52. Peruzzi L. & Altinordu F. 2014: A proposal for a multivariate quantitative approach to infer karyological relationships among taxa. —  Comp. Cytogen. 8: 337–349. Google Scholar

  53. Peruzzi L. & Eroglu H. E. 2013: Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? —  Comp. Cytogen. 7: 1–9. Google Scholar

  54. Pfeiffer L. 1873–1875: Nomenclator botanicus 1. Pars altera. — Cassellis:  Theodori FischeriGoogle Scholar

  55. Phitos D. G. & Kamari G. A. 2009: Mαθήµατα Гεωβoτανικής [Lessons of Geobotany; in Greek]. — Patras: University of Patras. Google Scholar

  56. Raulin V. 1869: Description physique de I'île de Crète 2. — Paris: Arthus Bertrand. Google Scholar

  57. Reese G. 1957: Uber die Polyploidiespektren in der nordsaharischen Wustenpflanzen. — Flora 144: 598–634. Google Scholar

  58. Rešetnik I., Satovic Z., Schneeweiss G. M. & Liber Z. 2013: Phylogenetic relationships in Brassicaceae tribe Alysseae inferred from nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast sequence DNA data. —  Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 69: 772–786. Google Scholar

  59. Samaropoulou S., Bareka P. & Kamari G. 2016: Karyomorphometric analysis of Fritillaria montana group in Greece. —  Comp. Cytogen. 10: 679–695. Google Scholar

  60. Sell P. D. 1976a: Hymenonema Cass. — Pp. 305–306 in: Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webbs D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea 4. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  61. Sell P. D. 1976b: Scolymus L. — P. 304 in: Tutin T. G., Hey wood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webbs D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea 4. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  62. Sharma O. P. 2009: Plant taxonomy, ed. 2. — New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar

  63. Siljak-Yakovlev S. & Peruzzi L. 2012: Cytogenetic characterization of endemics: past and future. — P1. Biosyst. 146: 694–702. Google Scholar

  64. Stebbins G. L. 1953: A new classification of the tribe Cichorieae, family Compositae. — Madroño 1: 65–81. Google Scholar

  65. Stebbins G. L. 1971: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. — London: Edward Arnold Ltd. Google Scholar

  66. Stebbins G. L., Jenkins G. A. & Walters M. S. 1953: Chromosomes and phytogeny in the Compositae, tribe Cichorieae. — Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 26: 401–430. Google Scholar

  67. Strid A. 2015: Reliquiae Runemarkianae. Chromosome numbers of angiosperms from the Aegean islands. —  Phytol. Balcan. 21: 245–293. Google Scholar

  68. Strid A. 2016: Atlas of the Aegean flora. — Berlin: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin. — Engiera 33. Google Scholar

  69. Sybenga J. 1959: Some sources of error in the determination of chromosome length. —  Chromosoma 10: 355–364. Google Scholar

  70. Tan K., Iatrou G. & Johnsen B. 2001: Endemic plants of Greece: the Peloponnese. — København: Gads Forlag. Google Scholar

  71. Thiers B. 2017+ [continuously updated] : Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. — Published at  http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ [accessed 10 May 2017]. Google Scholar

  72. Tomb A. S. 1977: Lactuceae — systematic review. — Pp. 1067–1079 in: Heywood V. H., Harborne J. B. & Turner B. L. (ed.), The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. — London: Academic Press. Google Scholar

  73. Tomb A. S., Chambers K. L., Kyhos D. W., Powell A. M. & Raven P.H. 1978: Chromosome number in the Compositae. XIV. Lactuceae. —  Amer. J. Bot. 65: 717–721. Google Scholar

  74. Tournefort J. P. de. 1717: Relation d'un voyage du Levant, fait par ordre du Roy. […] 1. —  Paris: Imprimerie Royale. Google Scholar

  75. Tremetsberger K., Gemeinholzer B., Zetzsche H., Blackmore S., Kilian N. & Tala vera S. 2013: Divergence time estimation in Cichorieae (Asteraceae) using a fossil-calibrated relaxed molecular clock. —  Organisms Diversity Evol. 13: 1–13. Google Scholar

  76. Turner B. L., Ellis W. L. & King R. M. 1961: Chromosome numbers in the Compositae 4. —  Amer. J. Bot. 48: 216–223. Google Scholar

  77. UNEP-WCMC 2013: UNEP-WCMC Species Database. —Published at  https://www.unep-wcmc.org/[accessed 28 Oct 2013]. Google Scholar

  78. Verlaque R., Seidenbinder M. & Donadille P. 1987: Recherches cytotaxonomiques sur la spéciation en région Méditerranéenne I: espèces a nombre chromosomique stable. — Biol.-Ecol. Medit. 10: 273–289. Google Scholar

  79. Wagenitz G. 1976: Systematics and phylogeny of the Compositae (Asteraceae). —  PI. Syst. Evol. 125: 29–46. Google Scholar

  80. Waisel G. 1962: Ecotypic differentiation in the flora of Israel. II. Chromosome counts in some ecotype pairs. — Bull. Res. Council Israel, Sect. D, Bot. 11: 174–176. Google Scholar

  81. Watanabe K., Yahara T., Denda T. & Kosuge K. 1999: Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae): statistical tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. —  J. Pl. Res. 112: 145–16. Google Scholar

  82. Zaffran J. 1990: Contributions à la flore et à la végétation de la Crète. — Aix en Provence: Université de Provence Aix-Marseille 1. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix: List of material examined

Populations indicated by an asterisk (*) have been studied karyologically.

1. Hymenonema laconicum

Greece: Peloponnisos: Arkadia: NW slopes of Mt Parnon, 2–3 km E of village “Ajios Petros” along road to “Moni Malevis”, place called Zonanga, 900 m, dry, stony roadsides and rocky hillsides with Quercus coccifera, Phlomis and Spartium shrubs, limestone (ligules orange-yellow), 15 May 1970, Stamatiadou 8763 (ATH 14314); 1–2 km after crossing of road from Leonidion to Tsitalia village, 100 m, sandy-stony roadsides, dry fallow fields and phrygana (ligules orange-yellow with a purple spot at base), 18 May 1970, Stamatiadou 8915 (ATH 14313); c. 6.8 km from Leonidion towards Poulithra, close to Poulithra, 37°07′N, 22°53′E, 20–40 m, in roadsides and margins of abandoned fields (florets orange), 25 May 2002, Constantinidis & Kalpoutzakis 10112 (ATHU, UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); 3.1 km from small town of Leonidio towards Tsitalia village, 37°08′N, 22°53′E, 140–160 m, in stony slopes with abandoned olive groves, together with Ceratonia siliqua, Pistacia lentiscus, Calicotome villosa, Cistus creticus etc., 31 May 2004, Kalpoutzakis 1506 (ATHU, UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); *ibid., 37°08.90′N, 22°52.65′E, 113 m, 13 Jun 2014, Kofinas & Dolianitis 129 (UPA). — Lakonia: in regione olearum ad radices Taygeti in herbidis pr. Androuvista, Jun 1844, Heldreich s.n. (K 000797232, P 02831032, P 02831034, P 02831035, P 02831043, P 02831044); in herbidis reg. [radices] m. Taygeti Laconiae, Jun 1844, Heldreich s.n. (P 02831036, P 02831039); Taygetus, Heldreich s.n. (K 00797231); habit, in m. Malevo Laconiae, 3000′, 24 Jun 1857, Orphanides 1152 (P 02831038, WU 0077308); Morca: in collib. pr. Golass, 700 m, Jul 1879, Pichler s.n. (P 02831001, P 02831037, P 02831041, P 02831045); Mani, Petria-Arna, 1 Jan 1950, Goulimy 6040 (ATH 51278); Krokeai, 13 May 1955, Goulimy 6041 (ATH 51280); inter Sparta et Skouras, Iter Graecum XI 1964, Rechinger 24754 (B 100209164); Mt Taigetos, NW of Arna, c. 25 km S of Sparti, 36°53′N, 22°24′E, 950 m, 21 May 1964, Runemark & Snogerup 20568 (LD 800100); prope pagum Krokeae, in argilosis, 36°53′N, 22°33′E, 9 May 1965, Phitos 1459 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); village “Pirgos Dirou”, 200 m, semi-cultivated fields and grassy roadsides, limestone (red soil), 15 May 1970, Zoumpouli 8609 (ATH 14315); inter oppidum Gythion et pagum Krokeae, ad viam, 36°49′N, 22°31′E, in argilosis, 11 May 1979, Tzanoudakis & Iatrou 5724 (UPA); prope pagum Krokeae, 36°53′N, 22°33′E, in argilosis, 22 Jun 1980, Iatrou 588i (UPA); 4 km from Sidirokastron along road to Konakia, 400 m, (ligules orange yellow with brownish purple spot at base), 17 May 1991, Tan & Strid 31141 (ATH 42173); 1–2 km from Siderokastron, along road to Skofianitika and Skamnitsa, 36°46′N, 22°25′E, 530 m, in Quercus/Pistacia scrub, (latex white, ligules orange-yellow with purplish black base stigmas bright lemon-yellow), 18 Jun 1991, Tan & Void 9754 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); Eparchia Githiou, Siderokastron, 530 m, 28 Jul 1993, Tan 09754 (B 100185587); Ep. Lakedhemona: NE foothills of Mt Taijetos, Langadiotissa gorge SW of Parori, 37°03′30″N, 22°22′40″E, 350–500 m, on limestone substrate, 14 Jun 1995, Kamari & cd. 1533 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); 3.9 km after village of Geraki towards village of Alepochori, stony slope at left side of road, 36°58′N, 22°43′E, 320-350 m, abandoned olive grove, calcareous and schistose substrate, with Quercus coccifera, Phillyrea latifolia, Calicotome villosa, Coridothymus capitatus, Thymus laconicus, 2 May 2005, Kalpoutzakis 1656 (ATHU); 13–14 km NNE of village of Mitropoli, along a secondary road, 37°02'N, 22°59'E, 80–100 m, roadsides, limestone, 30 May 2005, Constantinidis & Kalpoutzakis 11380 (ATHU); C Taigetos, Anavriti, 37°2.148′N, 22°23.864′E, 800 m, 10 Jun 2007, Kyriakopoulos 659 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); Geraki, road from village to Alepohori, 36°58′56″N, 22°43′46″E, 300–400 m, 27 May 2012, Kofinas 128 (UPA); on roadsides between villages Taigeti and Mistras, 600 m, 15 Jun 2012, Kyriakopoulos & Kartsonas 1073 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); *Lagkada gorge, climbing region, 37°04′59.09″N, 22°18′39.30″E, 800 m, 24 Jun 2013, Kyriakopoulos 1524 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); Geraki, road from village to Alepohori, 36°58′56″N, 22°43′46″E, 300–400 m, 24 May 2014, Kofinas 126 (UPA); *Lagkada gorge, climbing region, 37°04′59.09″N, 22°18′39.30″E, 800 m, 25 May 2014, Liveri & Kofinas 130 (UPA); Krokees village, 25 May 2014, Liveri & Kofinas 131 (UPA); entrance of Kaiadas, 15 Jun 2014, Kofinas 132 (UPA); *Geraki, road from village to Alepohori, 36°58′56″N, 22°43′46″E, 300–400 m, 16 Jun 2014, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 124 (UPA); Anavriti, 37°02.146′N, 22°24.049′E, 440 m, 5 Jul 2014, Kyriakopoulos & Kofinas s.n. (UPA). — Messinia: Ep. Kalamon: pr. Selitza ad radices m. Taygeti, 37°03′N, 22°07′E, 28 May 1894, Heldreich (LD 37837); ibid., 15 May 1896, Heldreich 1355 (LD 37838, P 02831030, P 02831031); ibid., 15 May 1896, Heldreich 1355 (K 000797230); Laconia boreo-occidentalis : in regione litorali ad radices m. Selitza prope Kalamata, 15 May—15 Jul 1896, Zahn 1355 (K 000797229, P 02831040, P 02831042, P 03763056, P 03763058, P 04310661); Ep. Kalamata: c. 2 km from Ano Amfia along road to Thouria, 37°05′45″N, 22°03′20″E, c. 150 m, olive groves and field margins, on sandstone, 14 Jun 1995, Kamari & cd. 2591 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); 8 km SE of Kalamata, locally common on roadsides, along olive gr[oves] (this specimen taken above hotel Lida), 4 Apr 1996, Emanuelsson 1886 (S 1012275); Rintomo, 680 m, 13 Jun 2009, Kyriakopoulos s.n. (photo!); S part of Mt Taigetos, peak of Zizali, in area of Tsopania, 36°49'N, 22°24'E, 1000 m, 30 May 2013, Kyriakopoulos & Kartsonas 1463 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); close to junction of provincial road Dirachiou-Thourias, 37°9.780′N, 22°11.488′E, 700 m, 1 Jun 2015, Kyriakopoulos & Kofinas 2196 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari).

2. Hymenonema graecum

Greece: Aegean Islands: Kiklades: Ins. Anafi: Insula Anaphi, 3 Jun 1898, Leonis 56 (P 02831024, P 02831048); Kalamos, 1 km E of monastery, 36°21′N, 25°51′E, 0–200 m, cliffs, garrigue, 8 May 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 8132 (LD 1544455); ibid., 8 May 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 8134 (LD 1530335); Anafi, 0–1 km N of Chora, 36°21′N, 25°46′E , 200–300 m, gneiss-granite, 27 Apr 1995, Runemark 50558 (1804865 LD); Anafi, substrate calcareous rocks, 36°21′36.0″N, 25°47′54.4″E, 320 m, 26 Apr 2011, Kougioumoutzis 1172 (UPA); ibid., 36°21′42.8″N, 25°47′58.9″E, 245 m, substrate gabbrodiorites, 26 Apr 2011, Kougioumoutzis 1431 (UPA); ibid., 36°21′20.7″N, 25°46′32.4″E, 210 m, substrate alluvial, 26 Apr 2011, Kougioumoutzis 1499 (UPA); ibid., 36°21′27.8″N, 25°46′23.4″E, 275 m, substrate granite, 28 May 2011, Kougioumoutzis 1842 (UPA). — Ins. Andikeros: 36°51′N, 25°41′E, cliffs, 6 Jul 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 12354 (LD 1555541). — Ins. Andros: near sea 2 km SW of Zaganiari, 50–100 m, 16 Jun 1964, Snogerup 21122 (LD 1532135); Oros Rakhi, 600–800 m, 17 May 1968, Snogerup & Bothmer 32123 (LD 1532075); along road from Paleopolis to Stavropedha, place called “Kakia Melissa”, 150 m, stony roadsides and dry hillsides with phrygana and schistose rocks, (ligules orange-yellow), 13 Jun 1969, Stamatiadou 6616 (ATH 14312); Batsi, terrace walls NE of village, 16 Apr 1990, Snogerup & Snogerup 6666 (LD 1247052); Batsi, along roadsides NE of village, 37°51′09″N, 24°47′20″E, 20–25 m, phrygana, 14 Jul 2014, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 114 (UPA); *Batsi, residential area, Agios Filippos church, 37°51′09″N, 24°47′20″E, 45 m, 14 Jul 2014, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 115 (UPA). — Ins. Anidros: insula Anhydros (Amorgopulos), 36°37′N, 25°41′E, in saxosis, substr. calc., 6 May 1934, Rechinger & Rechinger 5260 (LD 1973900); SW part of island, 36°38′N, 25°41′E, limestone, garigue, 9 May 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 8261 (LD 1530275). — Ins. Folegandros: Adelfia Petra, E island, 36°37′N, 24°59′E, litoral limestone rocks, 23 May 1960, Runemark & Nordenstam 14591 (LD 1555661). — Ins. Iraklia: cycladum insula Heraklia, 36°51′N, 25°28′E, in lapidosis, 3 May 1934, Rechinger & Rechinger 4892 (LD 1990997); S of harbour, 36°50′N, 25°29′E, 7 Jun 1957, Runemark 4146 (LD 1544275); Ormos Pegadi, small valley W of bay, 36°50′N, 25°29′E, on sandy soil, 10 Apr 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 5297 (LD 1530395); path SSW of abandoned settlement of Agios Athanasios at CW parts of island, 36°50′N, 25°26′E, 110–280 m, stony dry fields, path sides with sparse Juniperus phoenicea, Cistus creticus, Coridothymus capitatus, mostly schists, (flowers yellow), 9 May 2013, Constantinidis & Bazos 13190 (ATHU). — Ins. Kardiotissa: 36°38′N, 25°01′E, garigue, 22 May 1960, Runemark & Nordenstam 14528 (LD 1555601). — Ins. Kea: in insula Cea, solo schistoco (“schiste cristallin”), 21–24 May 1898, Svoronos s.n. (P 02831021). — Ins. Kimolos: Kimolos, Kougioumoutzis s.n. (photo!). — Ins. Kithnos: Cycladum insula Cythnos, 17 May 1964, Pinatzis 19069 (UPA, herb. Pinatzi); Merikha bay (W side), 20–40 m, garigue, 29 Jun 1966, Strid 23332 (LD 1556201); in collibus supra pagi Merichas ad viam versus pagum Dryopida, c. 100 m, solo schistoso, 20 May 2007, Phitos & Kamari 28005 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); in collibus ad meridiem pagi Merichas spectantibus, c. 50 m, in nanofruticetosis, solo schistoso, 20 May 2007, Phitos & Kamari 27334 (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); *ibid., 12 Jul 2013, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 100 (UPA). — Ins. Koufonisia: Kopria, 36°59′N, 25°38′E, hard limestone cliffs, 5 Jun 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 10279a (LD 1554341). — Ins. Makares: Prasonisi, 37°05′N, 25°42′E, 0–80 m, garigue, 26 May 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 9662 (LD 1544515, LD 1555481). — Ins. Mikonos: island of Stapodia, 37°25′N, 25°34′E, 13 May 1968, Runemark & Engstrand 35556 (LD 1530035); island of Ag. Georgios, 37°27′N, 25°18′E, 13 May 1968, Runemark & Engstrand 35631 (LD 1529975); valley S of Mt Ag. Elias, 37°28′N, 25°20′E, 50–100 m, 13 May 1968, Runemark & Engstrand 35355 (LD 1530155); S of Ag. Stefanos, 37°28′N, 25°20′E, 13 May 1968, Runemark & Engstrand 35455 (LD 1530095); 2 km N of Ag. Stefano, 37°30′N, 25°19′E, 17 May 1968, Runemark & Engstrand 36121 (LD 1541017). — Ins. Milos: en insula Melos, 1820, Urville s.n. (P 02831050); Milo, île d′archipel., Urville s.n. (P02831011); coteaux de Melos, Urville 22 (G 00498237); Erimomilos 29 Jun—2 Jul 1948, Goulimy 6038 (ATH 51274); S of Akr. Roma, in a valley, 36°42′N, 24°32′E, 17 Jun 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 29666 (LD 1556141); W and SW Chivadolimni, wet area, 36°44′N, 24°26′E, 5 May 2003, Runemark 51574 (LD 1666654). — Ins. Naxos: Naxie, 1822, Olivier s.n. (G 00498239); Naxos, Olivier & Bruguiere s.n. (P 02831010, P 02831022); in Cycladum insula Naxos, 10 Jul 1897, Leonis s.n. (P 02831023); insula Naxos, 13 May 1898, Leonis 122 (P 02831047, P 03763059); in cycladum insula Naxos, May 1898, Leonis 4171 (LD 1989781, P 02831046, P 02831051, P 02831052, P 02831057); in monte Phanariotissa ad pagum Apiranthos, 37°08′N, 25°31′E, 600–800 m, in saxosis calc., 28 Jun 1932, Rechinger 2237 (LD 1989973); Filoti-Apiranthos, 21–24 Jun 1954, Goulimy 6037 (ATH 51273); Naxos, 37°08′N, 25°27′E, 13 May 1957, Runemark 2637 (LD 1543915); E of Mytria, along a small stream, 37°08′N, 25°27′E, 100–150 m, limestone cliffs, garigue, 13 May 1957, Runemark 2637 (LD 1544635); ibid., 31 May 1957, Runemark 3635 (LD 1544095); Metri N of Moni, 37°05′N, 25°30′E, 500–530 m, 20 May 1957, Runemark 3174 (LD 1543975); Faneromeni, along a small stream, 37°09′N, 25°29′E, 50–120 m, 22 May 1957, Runemark 3299 (LD 1544035); ENE of Skado, valley with a rill, 37°08′N, 25°33′E, 500 m, 1 Jun 1957, Runemark 3736 (LD 1544155); SSE of Axapsis, along a small stream, 37°07′N, 25°26′E, 3 Jun 1957, Runemark 3909 (LD 1544215); 2 km NNW of Ormos Liona, 37°09′N, 25°35′E, garigue near sea, 24 May 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 9052 (LD 1530455); in valley 0–3 km N of Ormos Agiasou, 36°59′N, 25°26′E, 5–60 m, garigue, 3 Jun 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 10134 (LD 1554281); Kalando, cultivated in Botanical Garden of University of Lund, 36°56′N, 25°28′E, 4 Jun 1958, Runemark cult. 1212 (LD 1554161, LD 1554221); Psiliamos Ormos, 37°01′N, 25°34′E, 7 Jun 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 10649 (LD 1555421, LD 1558004); NW outskirts of town of Naxos, 37°07′N, 25°24′E, 25 m, calcareous soils, 29 May 1982, Franzén & Andersson 1009 (LD 1557944); Prokopios, 30 m, garrigue, 29 Sep 1989, Jäth s.n. (B 100209163); Ostküste, Moutsouna, Landzunge S des Hafens, 10 m, 16 May 2008, Karl s.n. (GZU 000272899). — Ins. Paros: Gaidouronisi, 37°09′N, 25°16′E, 30 m, 18 May 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 29188 (LD 1556321). — Ins. Poliegos: NW part, 36°47′N, 24°37′E, garigue-field, 19 Apr 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 26301 (LD 1544395). — Ins. Schinousa: between principal village and harbour, 36°52′N, 25°31′E, 9 Jun 1957, Runemark 4355 (LD 1544335); ibid., cultivated in Botanical Garden of University of Lund, 9 Jun 1957, Runemark cult. 124 (LD 1543795, LD 1543855); from village of Mersini towards N, on way to hill of Vardies, S and NW parts of hill, 36°52′N, 25°30′E, 10–120 m, phrygana with Pistacia lentiscus, Coridothymus capitatus, Teucrium brevifolium, and cultivated land, mostly schists, (flowers yellow), 10 May 2013, Constantinidis & Bazos 13199 (ATHU). — Ins. Serifopoula: 37°15′N, 24°36′E, 27 Apr 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 27771 (LD 1556021). — Ins. Serifos: Koutalas, 28 Apr 1927, Runemark & Bentzer 27978 (LD 1556081); rocks in Hora, (flowers bright yellow), 22 Jun 1961, Gathorne-Hardy 75 (ATH 21294); just N of village of Serifos, 37°09′N, 24°30′E, 130–140 m, vertical rocks facing NW, 1 Jul 1966, Strid 23354 (LD 1556501); 1–2 km SW of Livadion, 50–350 m, 26 Apr 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 27457 (LD 1556561, LD 1556441); 2–2.5 km SW of Livadion, 37°08′N, 24°30′E, 250–350 m, 26 Apr 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 27507 (LD 1555961); at strand and on rocks of Vagia-bay, 37°07′N, 24°27′E, 17 Jul 1982, Tiniakou 285 (UPA); from Taxiarchis closter downwards Plati Gialos Bay, 3°11′N, 24°29′E, micaceous schist, 7 May 1983, Tiniakou 478 (UPA); ibid., 7 May 1983, Tiniakou 494 (UPA); between villages of Panagia and Kentarchos, 37° 10′N, 24°29′E, c. 300 m, micaceous schist, 7 May 1983, Tiniakou 470 (UPA); Aspros Kavos, 37°07′N, 24°24′E, marbles, 9 May 1983, Tiniakou 534 (UPA); Livadi, port, 37°08′N, 24°27′E, granitic rocks, 9 May 1983, Tiniakou 545 (UPA); Koutalas, 400 m, 13 May 1990, Malicky s.n. (W); above Kato Ampeli bay, 37°07′N, 24°29′E, 200–300 m, granitic substrate, 11 May 1993, Tiniakou & al. 2305 (UPA); at Petrias Mt, 1–2 km after Pano Chora, 37°09′N, 24°30'E, 300–500 m, granitic substrate, 11 May 1993, Tiniakou & al. 2256 (UPA); Profitis Ilias, 28 Apr 1997, Tiniakou 3454 (UPA); Koutalas, 28 Apr 1997, Tiniakou 3654 (UPA); ibid., 28 Apr 1997, Tiniakou 3585 (UPA); S of Panagia, 37°11′N, 24°25′E, 400 m, 1 Jun 2008, Runemark 51955 (LD 1804801); Aspros Kavos, marbles, 3 Aug 2014, Tiniakou & Tiniakos 111 (UPA); Kalo Ampeli, 3 Aug 2014, Tiniakou & Tiniakos 112 (UPA). — Ins. Sifnos: limestone hill S of Ormos Kondos, 36°54′N, 24°42′E, garigue, 10–100 m, 13 May 1958, Runemark & Snogerup 8402 (LD 1530215); S of Kamares, 36°59′N, 24°40′E, 20 Jun 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 29981 (LD 1555901). — Ins. Sikinos: E of Kastro, 36°42′N, 25°08′E, 200–350 m, N-exposed cliffs, 9 Apr 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 24645 (LD 1544575); E promontory, 36°43′N, 25°11′E, S-exposed cliffs facing sea, 10 Apr 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 24792 (LD 1555841); S-slope of highest mountain, 36°40′N, 25°06′E, 0–600 m, 10 Apr 1967, Runemark & Bentzer 24941 (LD 1556261); NW parts of island, along path from ancient monument of Episkopi to Manali well, 36°40′N, 25°05′E, 260–310 m, edges of cultivated land, rocky slopes, stone walls and phrygana, siliceous schist (upper part) and bmestone, (florets yellow-orange), 16 Apr 2014, Constantinidis 13399 (ATHU). — Ins. Siros: Insula Syra, 1837, Aucher-Éloy 3508 (G 00498240, P 02831012, P 02831014); legimus in ins. Syro, in collibus siccis et ad vias, 37°27′N, 24°55′E, 4 Jul 1889, Heldreich 1055 (LD 1989909, P 02831052, P 02831054, P 02831055, P 02831056, P 02831058, P 04310662, P 04402753); insula Syros, 3–4 Jul 1889, Heldreich (P 02831027, P 02831028, P 02831049); Episkopion, 14 May 1921, Ksenakis s.n. (UPA, herb. Phitos & Kamari); Lotos-Kini, 14–16 Oct 1957, Goulimy 6039 (ATH 51276); 1 km SE of Kini, 200 m, 20 Jun 1964, Snogerup 21139 (LD 1555781); islet of Strongylo E of Didymi, 37°26′N, 24°59′E, 27 May 1968, Snogerup & Bothmer 33426 (LD 1556381); island of Aspronisos, 37°24′N, 25°00′E, 50 m, hard limestone, 27 May 1968, Snogerup & Bothmer 33443 (LD 1540897); islet of Ampelos E of Vari, 37°23′N, 24°57′E, 5 m, 27 May 1968, Snogerup & Bothmer 33496 (LD 1532315); islet of Kommeno NE of Ermoupolis, 37°28′N, 24°57′E, 20 m, 28 May 1968, Snogerup & Bothmer 33603 (LD 1532255); islet of Varvarousa, 37°28′N, 24°54′E, 25 m, limestone, 28 May 1968, Snogerup & Bothmer 33655 (LD 1532195); *Kini, along roadsides from beach to village for a distance up to 1 km approximately, 37°26′N, 24°57′E, 13 Jul 2013, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 107 (UPA); *Agathopes, road towards beach, 37°23′N, 24°52′E, 0–10 m, on rocks very close to sea, 15 Jul 2013, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 110 (UPA); Megas Gialos, 37°22.75′N, 24°54.40′E, 25 m, 7 Aug 2014, Ketsilis-Rinis 113 (UPA). — Ins. Tinos: ad litore ins. Teni, 37°33′N, 25°06′E, 16 May 1851, Sartori s.n. (LD 1989717, P 02831025); Platia Ammos, 37°33′N, 25°08′E, 18 May 1968, Runemark & Engstrand 36363 (LD 1540957); c. 1 km W of Kionia, 16 Aug 1987, Landstrom 7346 (LD 1246992); *Monastiri, Arnados, Dio Choria, along roadsides connecting these three villages, 37°33′44″N to 37°33′47″N, 25°10′58″E to 25°11′29″E, 350–450 m, 17 Jul 2014, Liveri & KetsilisRinis 117 (UPA); *Kionia bay, 37°33′12.7″N, 25°08′10.5″E, 0–100 m, on rocks, phrygana, 18 Jul 2014, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 121 (UPA); *Kolimpithra bay, 37°37′49.4″N, 25°08′44.5″E, 0-10 m, on rocks, phrygana, 19 Jul 2014, Liveri & Ketsilis-Rinis 123 (UPA).

© 2018 The Authors · This open-access article is distributed under the CC BY 4.0 licence
Eleni Liveri, Pepy Bareka, and Georgia Kamari "Taxonomic study on the Greek endemic genus Hymenonema (Asteraceae: Cichorieae), using morphological and karyological traits," Willdenowia 48(1), (1 January 2018). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.48.48101
Received: 14 July 2017; Accepted: 15 November 2017; Published: 1 January 2018
JOURNAL ARTICLE
17 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top