Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
22 May 2020 A morphometric and karyological study of Onobrychis calabrica (Fabaceae), a neglected species endemic to Calabria, S Italy
Liliana Bernardo, Giovanni Maiorca, Jacopo Franzoni, Francesco Roma-Marzio, Lorenzo Peruzzi
Author Affiliations +

A morphometric (multivariate and univariate) and karyological study of Onobrychis calabrica Širj. (Fabaceae), compared to O. alba subsp. echinata (Guss.) P. W. Ball and O. supina (Chaix ex Vill.) DC., was carried out. According to our results, twelve morphological characters clearly support the distinctiveness of O. calabrica. In addition, the latter species is tetraploid with 2n = 4x = 28 chromosomes, whereas the other two taxa are diploid with 2n = 2x = 14 chromosomes. The names O. calabrica and O. handel-mazzettii Širj. (a heterotypic synonym of O. supina) are lectotypified here. Onobrychis calabrica, a narrow endemic to SE Calabria, S Italy, is here assessed as Critically Endangered CR B1ab(iii)+B2ab(iii) following IUCN Red List categories and criteria.

Citation: Bernardo L., Maiorca G., Franzoni J., Roma-Marzio F. & Peruzzi L. 2020: A morphometric and karyological study of Onobrychis calabrica (Fabaceae), a neglected species endemic to Calabria, S Italy. – Willdenowia 50: 217–224.

Version of record first published online on 22 May 2020 ahead of inclusion in August 2020 issue.


The genus Onobrychis Mill. (Fabaceae) includes nearly 170 annual and perennial species, which are distributed mainly in the N temperate regions, with the centres of diversity in the E Mediterranean area and SW Asia (Ranjbar & al. 2012, 2013, 2018; Safaei Chaei Kar & al. 2012; Abuş & Avci 2018). Based on features of indumentum and corolla, supported by molecular data, the genus is subdivided in two subgenera: O. subg. Onobrychis, including two sections, and O. subg. Sisyrosema (Bunge ex Boiss.) Širj., including seven sections (Amirahmadi 2016). According to Širjaev (1925, 1926), these sections can be further subdivided in a total of nineteen subsections.

In Italy, only Onobrychis subg. Onobrychis occurs, with 13 specific and subspecific taxa (Bartolucci & al. 2018). Two species, included in O. sect. Lophobrychis Hand.-Mazz., are annual herbs: O. aequidentata (Sm.) d'Urv. and O. caput-galli (L.) Lam. All other taxa, included in O. sect. Onobrychis, are perennials: O. alba (Waldst. & Kit.) Desv. subsp. alba, O. alba subsp. echinata (Guss.) P. W. Ball, O. alba subsp. pentelica (Hausskn.) Nyman, O. arenaria (Kit.) DC. subsp. arenaria, O. arenaria subsp. taurerica Hand.-Mazz., O. arenaria subsp. tommasinii (Jord.) Asch. & Graebn., O. calabrica Širj., O. montana DC. subsp. montana, O. saxatilis (L.) Lam., O. supina (Chaix ex Vill.) DC. and O. viciifolia Scop.

Onobrychis handel-mazzettii Širj. was described based on specimens from Liguria and Calabria, Italy (Širjaev 1925). It is currently considered as a heterotypic synonym of O. supina, a species distributed from E Spain to NW Italy (Ball 1968). Širjaev attributed O. handel-mazzettii and O. supina to O. subsect. Macrosemiae Hand.-Mazz., characterized by flowers in which the standard is longer than the keel. Later, Širjaev (1931) changed his view, restricting the application of the name O. handel-mazzettii (as O. supina subsp. handel-mazzettii (Širj.) Širj.) to plants from Liguria, while plants from Calabria (collected by Huter, Porta and Rigo and identified as “O. echinata Dietr.”) were attributed to a different species: O. calabrica Širj.

According to Širjaev (1931), Onobrychis calabrica has a shorter standard than other species of O. subsect. Macrosemiae and represents a transitional form toward O. subsect. Vulgatae Hand.-Mazz. Moreover, O. calabrica has been treated as a heterotypic synonym of O. supina (Ball 1968; Euro+Med 2006+; Roskov & al. 2019), although it was neglected by Greuter & al. (1989), Conti & al. (2005) and Pignatti (1982, 2017; O. supina is doubtfully reported from Calabria). Peruzzi & al. (2015) and Bartolucci & al. (2018) resurrected the name O. calabrica as applying to a taxonomically doubtful species.

Onobrychis alba subsp. echinata, an Italian endemic that occurs close to the locus classicus of O. calabrica (Brullo & al. 2001), was included by Širjaev in O. subsect. Albae Hand.-Mazz., because of the standard being distinctly shorter than the keel. Despite this, nonflowering plants share very similar vegetative habit and hair-coverage with O. calabrica. The original samples of O. calabrica collected by Huter, Porta and Rigo were attributed to O. echinata by mistake likely for this reason.

Table 1.

Comparison between Onobrychis alba subsp. echinata, O. calabrica and O. supina of characters used in the morphometric analyses. Quantitative numerical values are expressed as mean ± SD. Character states marked by different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.01). Significantly different character states among O. calabrica and the other two taxa are shown in bold here and in Fig. 3.


The aim of the present work is to clarify the taxonomic position of Onobrychis calabrica with respect to O. supina and to O. alba subsp. echinata, using morphometric and karyological approaches.

Material and methods

The protologues of Onobrychis handel-mazzettii and O. calabrica and digital images of their original material (in FI, JE, W and WU; herbarium codes according to Thiers 2019+) were studied, in order to designate nomenclatural types and fix the application of names.

In spring 2018, Onobrychis calabrica (Fig. 1) was collected in its locus classicus (Gerace, reggio calabria, s italy, 38°16′N, 16°12′E), an area characterized by arenaceous detrital deposits at the base of calcarenitic sandstone. We collected 20 well-preserved individuals, complete with leaves, flowers and ripe pods, to represent the overall morphological variation at population level. For each individual, a herbarium specimen was prepared and conserved in cLu. Thirteen morphological characters (Table 1) were measured on these herbarium specimens. all the characters were measured on dried and pressed specimens under a stereomicroscope, using a digital calliper with 0.1 mm precision. For comparative purposes, the same characters were measured on 20 herbarium specimens (= 20 individuals) of O. alba subsp. echinata from calabria, conserved in cLu, and on 19 herbarium specimens (= 19 individuals) of O. supina collected in France and Liguria (nW italy), conserved in Fi and pi (see Appendix 1).

Fig. 1.

Onobrychis calabrica on calcarenitic sandstone near the town of Gerace, SE Calabria, S Italy. – A: flowering individual; B: detail of inflorescence. – Photographed on 21 April 2018 by L. Bernardo.


The quantitative data were subjected to discriminant analysis after logarithmic transformation, with the individuals a priori assigned to the three taxa based on geographical distribution and morphological features. Each character was also subjected to univariate analysis (ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test with corrections for multiple comparisons, Tukey HSD test and Bonferroni, respectively, after checking for homoscedasticity of each variable). All analyses were carried out with PAST 3.22 software (Hammer & al. 2001; Hammer 2018). Boxplots were built by means of Plotly Technologies Inc. (2015).

Fig. 2.

Discriminant analysis based on 13 quantitative continuous characters. In blue, the relative contribution of each variable is reported.


Concerning karyological analysis of Onobrychis calabrica (from the locus classicus) and of O. alba subsp. echinata (from Fiumara Avena, Cosenza, N Calabria), squash preparations were made on root tips obtained from germinating seeds. Seeds were obtained from the same herbarium specimens used for morphometric analyses. For germination, seeds were sown in 90 mm-diam. Petri dishes containing 1% distilled water agar and maintained in temperature- and light-controlled incubators, using respectively a 20/10°C and 12 h daily photo- and thermoperiod. Root tips were excised when c. 5 mm long and pre-treated with 0.4% colchicine at room temperature for 3 hours and then fixed in Carnoy's fixative solution for 1 hour. After hydrolysis in HCl 1N at 60°C for 9 minutes, the tips were stained in leuco-basic fuchsine (Sigma). For karyotype reconstruction, three or four metaphase plates from different seeds were photographed and then measured by means of the software KaryoType (Altınordu & al. 2016). The same software was also used to estimate karyotype asymmetry parameters (Peruzzi & Eroğlu 2013). Karyotype asymmetry parameters were also calculated for O. supina, based on published metaphase plate data (Sacristán 1965; Verlaque & al. 1987; Garnatje & Cardona 1988).

Fig. 3.

Boxplots showing those statistically significant morphological characters less overlapping among the three taxa. Character abbreviations follow Table 1.



Morphometric analysis

Discriminant analysis resulted in 98.31% (jackknifed) correct classification of individuals, a priori attributed to the three taxa (Fig. 2). No overlapping among individuals of Onobrychis alba subsp. echinata, O. calabrica and O. supina was found, showing a clear distinction between these units. All characters except SL (loadings on both axes with value < |0.0025|) contribute neatly to the discriminant function. In particular, high values of LL, PL, PW and NSC contribute to separate O. calabrica from the other two taxa. Furthermore, high values of WL, NPS and LPS clearly separate O. calabrica from O. supina and low values of LCT and KL separate O. calabrica from O. alba subsp. echinata.

Results of univariate analysis of continuous characters are summarized in Table 1 and shown in Fig. 3. The states of five characters (CL, WCT, KL, NPS and LPS) show significant differences among the three taxa (P < 0.01). In addition, the states of further four characters (LL, PL, PW and NSC) are significantly different between Onobrychis calabrica and the other two taxa (P < 0.01). As mentioned above, no significant difference in SL was found.

Karyological analysis

Onobrychis calabrica from the locus classicus is tetraploid, with 2n = 4x = 28 chromosomes, while O. alba subsp. echinata from Fiumara Avena is diploid, with 2n = 2x = 14 chromosomes (Fig. 4). Total haploid chromosome length (THL) ranged from 9.54–18.36 µm in the former taxon, and from 10–15.2 µm in the latter. Despite the difference in chromosome number, karyotype asymmetry is more or less overlapping among the studied taxa (Fig. 5).


Širjaev (1931) described Onobrychis calabrica based on samples collected by Huter, Porta and Rigo, which they provisionally attributed to O. echinata. However, quantitative morphological comparisons show that O. calabrica is clearly distinct from O. echinata, especially based on floral and fruit features (LCT, KL, PL, NPS and LPS). We expected this result because the two species belong to two different subsections basing on standard and keel size ratio (Handel-Mazzetti 1909; Širjaev 1925).

The discriminant analysis also highlights the differences between Onobrychis calabrica and O. supina. In particular, O. calabrica shows leaflets and calyx (LL and CL) significantly longer and pods always larger (PL and PW), with longer and more numerous spines (NPS and LPS).

The relevance of fruit features went unnoticed by Širjaev (1931), because pods were absent from the sampled specimens: “Valde doleo, quod legumina huius speciei non vidi.” [I am very sorry that I have not seen the pods of this species].

Fig. 4.

Metaphase plates. – A: Onobrychis calabrica from the locus classicus, 2n = 4x = 28. – B: Onobrychis alba subsp. echinata from Fiumara Avena, Calabria, 2n = 2x = 14. – Scale bars: A, B = 10 µm.


Fig. 5.

Scatter plot of CVCL, coefficient of variation of chromosome length (x axis) over MCA, mean centromeric asymmetry (y axis) in karyotypes of Onobrychis calabrica from the locus classicus (filled circles), O. alba subsp. echinata from Fiumara Avena (crosses) and O. supina from literature (empty triangles). – A = Aineto, Spain (data from Sacristan 1965); BdR = Bouches du Rhône, France (data from Verlaque & al. 1987); D = Durro and CdB = Caldes de Boi, Spain (data from Garnatje & Cardona 1988).


Onobrychis calabrica is also clearly distinct from O. alba subsp. echinata and O. supina on karyological grounds, given that the former species is polyploid and the others are diploid (see also Sacristán 1965; Verlaque & al. 1987; Garnatje & Cardona 1988; Cenci & al. 2000; Astuti & al. 2019). However, karyotype asymmetry highlights a general resemblance in karyotype structure among these species (Fig. 5). Other E Mediterranean species belonging to the O. supina aggregate (Greuter & al. 1989) show a tetraploid complement with 2n = 28 chromosomes, such as O. gracilis Besser and O. pindicola Hausskn. (Kozuharov & al. 1972; Pogan & al. 1980; Strid 1986), but these are clearly distinct from O. calabrica on morphological grounds, because O. gracilis shows a glabrous calyx and an unarmed pod crest, and O. pindicola shows a pod crest with teeth to 3.5(–5) mm long.

Accordingly, all the available morphological and karyological data concur in providing evidence that Onobrychis calabrica should be regarded as a good species, narrow endemic to SE Calabria, S Italy.

Taxonomic treatment

Onobrychis calabrica Širj. in Izv. Bulg. Bot. Druzh. 4: 10. 1931. – Lectotype (designated here): Italy, “Calabria orient. I. parte austr occid. praeruptorum urbis Gerace, sol. cretaceo”, 400 m, 26 May 1877, R. Huter, P. Porta & G. Rigo ex itinere italico III No. 245 [under name O. echinata] ( W-Rchb. No. 1889-0060084!; isolectotypes: WU No. 0102743!, FI!). – Syntypes: Calabria, Prov. Reggio, Gerace, in pascuis, solo cretaceo, 7 Jun 1898, G. Rigo, Iter quartum anni 1898 n. 333 [under name O. echinata] (W No. 1898-0008811!, WU No. 0102741!, WU No. 0102744!, WU No. 0102745!).

Description based on studied materialPerennials, herbaceous, (35–)50(–65) cm tall at fruiting, grey pubescent; rootstock ± woody; flowering stem erect. Leaves imparipinnate; leaflets in 7–10 pairs, linear to elliptic (18.3–)21(–26.8) × (1.5–)2.5(–3.2) mm, sericeous-pubescent. Flowers in fairly dense racemes. Calyx (5.1–)5.7(–6.3) mm long, hairy; teeth 2–3 × as long as tube, margin ciliate. Corolla pink-salmon with darker veins, (7.7–)8.6(–9.6) mm long, glabrous; standard 1.2–1.4 × as long as keel, c. 1.5 × as long as calyx. Pod (5.8–)6.6(–7.4) × (4.2–)4.7(–5.3) mm (not including spines), indehiscent, pubescent, with 19–28 spines, 5–8 on margin, longest one (1.3–)1.8(–2.6) mm long.

Phenology — Flowering in April–May, fruiting in May–June.

Distribution — Presently known from a single population near the town of Gerace, SE Calabria, S Italy (38°16′N, 16°12′E), the locus classicus of this species.

Habitat — Arenaceous detrital deposits and on ledges of calcarenitic cliffs.

Conservation status — This species is assessed here as Critically Endangered CR B1ab(iii)+B2ab(iii), according to IUCN categories and criteria (IUCN 2012), because of the restricted extent of occurrence (< 100 km2), the small area of occupancy (< 10 km2) and the occurrence in a single location, which is subjected to habitat alteration due to coniferous afforestation, grazing and accidental fire.

Additional specimens examinedItaly: Calabria: Gerace, rupi del castello, su rupe arenacea esposta a W-sW, 425 m, 21 apr 2018, G. Maiorca & L. Bernardo s.n. (CLU 26259!, Herb. Maiorca-Caprio 5023!); ibidem, depositi detritici consolidati alla base di rupi calcarenitiche e arenacee, 475 m, 8 Jun 2018, G. Maiorca & L. Bernardo s.n. (CLU 26260!, Herb. Maiorca-Caprio 5075!); Gerace (Reggio Calabria), appena fuori dalla zona di rimboschimento (38.275425°N, 16.212115°E), rupe calcarenitica con alta esposizione, 2 May 2019, J. Franzoni & D. Scalzo s.n. (PI 026682!). See also Appendix 1.

Hedysarum supinum Chaix ex Vill., Prosp. Hist. Pl. Dauphiné: 41. 1779 ≡ Onobrychis supina (Chaix ex Vill.) DC. in Lamarck & Candolle, Fl. Franç., ed. 3, 4: 612. 1805. – Original material: à Gap, à Veynes, à Laric, à Serres, s.d., [Villars] (GRM No. MHNGr.1837.28299!).

= Onobrychis handel-mazzettii Širj. in Spisy Přír. Fak. Masarykovy Univ. 56: 90. 1925 ≡ Onobrychis supina subsp. handel-mazzettii (Širj.) Širj. in Izv. Bulg. Bot. Druzh. 4: 10. 1931. – Lectotype (designated here): Italy, “in coll. S. Angelo pr. Genuam”, 16 Apr 1893, C. Haussknecht s.n.JE barcode JE00024506!; isolectotype: JE barcode JE00024507!). – Syntypes: Genua, s.d., C. Haussknecht s.n. (JE barcodes JE00024508!, JE00024509!); Genua in Campo Santo, 25 Mar 1898, C. Haussknecht s.n. (JE barcode JE00024510!); Gènes (Ligurie), s.d., Miciol s.n. [under name O. tommasinii] (WU WU-Halácsy-Europaeum 0102742!); Italy, “Calabria orient. I. parte austr occid. praeruptorum urbis Gerace, sol. cretaceo”, 400 m, 26 May 1877, R. Huter, P. Porta & G. Rigo ex itinere italico III No. 245 [under name O. echinata] (W-Rchb. No. 1889-0060084!, WU No. 0102743!, FI!); Calabria, Prov. Reggio, Gerace, in pascuis, solo cretaceo, 7 Jun 1898, G. Rigo, Iter quartum anni 1898 n. 333 [under name O. echinata] (W No. 1898-0008811!, WU No. 0102741!, WU No. 0102744!, WU No. 0102745!).

Note — The typification of the name Onobrychis handel-mazzettii was crucial, because among the elements of original material for this name (Širjaev 1925), which was published six years before O. calabrica, there are also those specimens from Calabria later used by Širjaev to describe the latter species, so that the name O. handel-mazzettii, in the absence of a proper lectotypification, could even apply to Calabrian plants. On the other hand, it is clear from Širjaev (1931) that the author implicitly restricted the application of the name O. handel-mazzettii to plants from Liguria, when separating those from Calabria in a distinct species. After our typification, O. handel-mazzettii becomes a heterotypic synonym of O. supina.


This work was supported by the Progetto di Ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) PLAN.T.S. 2.0 – towards a renaissance of PLANt Taxonomy and Systematics lead by the University of Pisa, under the grant number 2017JW4HZK (Principal Investigator: Lorenzo Peruzzi). We thank Manuel B. Crespo (Universidad de Alicante) and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on an earlier version of this article.



Abuş Y. & Avci S. 2018: Karyological properties of some Onobrychis taxa belonging to a Hymenobrychis section growing naturally in Turkey. –  J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpaşa Univ. [JAFAG] 35: 103–110. Google Scholar


Altınordu F., Peruzzi L., Yu Y. & He X.-J. 2016: A tool for the analysis of chromosomes: KaryoType. –  Taxon 65: 586–592. Google Scholar


Amirahmadi A., Kazempour-Osaloo S., Kaveh A., Maassoumi A. A. & Naderi R. 2016: The phylogeny and new classification of the genus Onobrychis (FabaceaeHedysareae): evidence from molecular data. –  Pl. Syst. Evol. 302: 1445–1456. Google Scholar


Astuti G., Bartolucci F., Bernardo L., Conti F. & Peruzzi L. 2019: Chromosome numbers for the Italian flora: 8. –  Ital. Botanist 8: 117–121. Google Scholar


Ball P. W. 1968: Onobrychis Mill. – Pp. 187–191 in: Tutin T. G., Burges N. A., Chater A. O., Edmondson J. R., Heywood V. H., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea 2. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar


Bartolucci F., Peruzzi L., Galasso G., Albano A., Alessandrini A., Ardenghi N. M. G., Astuti G., Bacchetta G., Ballelli S., Banfi E., Barberis G., Bernardo L., Bouvet D., Bovio M., Cecchi L., Di Pietro R., Domina G., Fascetti S., Fenu G., Festi F., Foggi B., Gallo L., Gottschlich G., Gubellini L., Iamonico D., Iberite M., Jiménez-Mejías P., Lattanzi E., Marchetti D., Martinetto E., Masin R. R., Medagli P., Passalacqua N. G., Peccenini S., Pennesi R., Pierini B., Poldini L., Prosser F., Raimondo F. M., Roma-Marzio F., Rosati L., Santangelo A., Scoppola A., Scortegagna S., Selvaggi A., Selvi F., Soldano A., Stinca A., Wagensommer R. P., Wilhalm T. & Conti F. 2018: An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. –  Pl. Biosyst. 152: 179–303. Google Scholar


Brullo S., Scelsi F. & Spampinato G. 2001: La vegetazione dell'Aspromonte – studio fitosociologico. – Villa San Giovanni (Reggio Calabria): Laruffa. Google Scholar


Cenci C. A., Bassi G., Ferranti F., Romano B. 2000: Some morphometric, anatomical and biochemical characteristics of fruits and seeds of Onobrychis spp. in Italy. –  Pl. Biosyst. 134: 91–98. Google Scholar


Conti F., Abbate, G., Alessandrini, A. & Blasi, C. (ed.) 2005: An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. – Roma: Palombi. Google Scholar


Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at [accessed 21 Oct 2019]. Google Scholar


Garnatje T. & Cardona A. 1988: Fitodermologia i cariologia d'Onobrychis viciifolia Scop., O. supina (Chaix) DC. i O. saxatilis Lam. de Catalunya. – Orsis 3: 55–65. Google Scholar


Greuter W., Burdet H. M. & Long G. (ed.) 1989: Onobrychis. – Pp. 149–157 in: Med-Checklist 4. – Genève: OPTIMA. Google Scholar


Hammer Ø. 2018: PAST Version 3.22. – Oslo: Natural History Museum. – Published at Scholar


Hammer Ø., Harper D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. 2001: PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. – Palaeontol. Electron. 4: 1–9. Google Scholar


Handel-Mazzetti H. 1909: Revision der balkanischen und vorderasiatischen Onobrychis-Arten aus der Sektion Eubrychis [part 1 of 5]. –  Oesterr. Bot. Z. 59: 369–378. Google Scholar


IUCN 2012: Guidelines for application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional and national levels, version 4.0. – Gland & Cambridge: IUCN. – Published at  Google Scholar


Kozuharov S. I., Kuzmanov B. A. & Markova T. 1972: Reports. – Pp. 336–337 in: Löve Á., IOPB chromosome number reports XXXVI. –  Taxon 21: 333–346. Google Scholar


Peruzzi L., Domina G., Bartolucci F., Galasso G., Peccenini S., Raimondo F. M., Albano A., Banfi E., Barberis G., Bernardo L., Bovio M., Brullo S., Brundu G., Camarda I., Carta L., Conti F., Croce A., Iamonico D., Iberite G., Longo D., Marsili S., Medagli P., Pistarino A., Salmeri C., Santangelo A., Scassellati E., Selvi F., Soldano A., Stinca A., Villani M., Wagensommer R. P. & Passalacqua N. G. 2015: An inventory of the names of vascular plants endemic to Italy, their loci classici and types. –  Phytotaxa 196: 1–217. Google Scholar


Peruzzi L. & Eroğlu H. E. 2013: Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? –  Comp. Cytogen. 7: 1–9. Google Scholar


Pignatti S. 1982: Flora d'Italia 1: 764. – Bologna: Edagricole. Google Scholar


Pignatti S. 2017: Flora d'Italia, ed. 2, 2 : 633. – Milano: Edagricole. Google Scholar


Plotly Technologies Inc. 2015: Collaborative data science. – Montréal: Plotly Technologies Inc. – Published at  Google Scholar


Pogan E., Wcislow H. & Jankun A. 1980: Further studies in chromosome numbers of Polish angiosperms part XIII. – Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. 22: 37–69. Google Scholar


Ranjbar M., Askari A., Karamian R., Joharchi M. R. & Tolui Z. 2018: A new species of Onobrychis sect. Onobrychis (Fabaceae) from Iran. –  Phytotaxa 347: 285–291. Google Scholar


Ranjbar M., Hajmoradi F. & Karamian R. 2012: An overview on cytogenetics of the genus Onobrychis (Fabaceae) with special reference to O. sect. Hymenobrychis from Iran. –  Caryologia 65: 187–198. Google Scholar


Ranjbar M., Karamian R. & Hajmoradi F. 2009: Taxonomic notes on Onobrychis sect. Hymenobrychis (Fabaceae, Hedysareae) in Iran. –  Novon 19: 215–218. Google Scholar


Roskov Y., Zarucchi J., Novoselova M. & Bisby F. (ed.) 2019: ILDIS world database of legumes (version 12, May 2014). – In: Roskov Y., Ower G., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Bailly N., Kirk P. M., Bourgoin T., DeWalt R. E., Decock W., Nieukerken E. van, Zarucchi J. & Penev L. (ed.), Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life. – Leiden: Naturalis. – Published at [accessed Oct 2019]. Google Scholar


Sacristán M. D. 1965: Estudio citotaxonómico sobre el género Onobrychis (L.) Adanson con referencia especial a la citogenética de la esparceta (O. viciifolia Scop.). – Anales Estac. Exp. Aula Dei 8: 1–114. Google Scholar


Safaei Chaei Kar S., Ghanavati F., Mozafari J., Naghavi M. R., Amirabadizadeh H. & Darvish F. 2012: Phylogenetic relationships of Onobrychis Mill. (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA and morphological traits. –  Crop Breed. J. 2: 91–99. Google Scholar


Širjaev G. I. 1925: Onobrychis generis revisio critica. – Spisy Přír. Fak. Masarykovy Univ. 56: 1–197. Google Scholar


Širjaev G. I. 1926: Onobrychis generis revisio critica. – Spisy Přír. Fak. Masarykovy Univ. 76: 1–165. Google Scholar


Širjaev G. I. 1931: Supplementum ad monographiam Onobrychis generis revisio critica. – Izv. Bulg. Bot. Druzh. 4: 7–24. Google Scholar


Strid A. (ed.) 1986: Mountain flora of Greece 1. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar


Thiers B. 2019+ [continuously updated]: Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. – New York Botanical Garden's virtual herbarium. – Published at: [accessed Oct 2019]. Google Scholar


Verlaque R., Seidenbinder M. & Donadille P. 1987: Recherches cytotaxonomiques sur la spéciation en région Méditerranéenne I: espèces à nombre chromosomique stable. – Rev. Biol.-Écol. Méd. 10: 273–289. Google Scholar


Appendix 1. Specimens seen and studied for the morphometric analyses

Onobrychis alba subsp. echinata (Guss.) p. W. Ball — Italy: Calabria: Montegiordano (cosenza), nei pressi di Monte rotondella, poco oltre contrada s. Filippo, pendio eroso al margine della macchia a ginepri, 600 m, 25 Jun 2019, L. Bernardo & D. Gargano s.n. (cLu nos. 26286, 26287, 26289, 26290, 26291, 26292, 26293, 26294, 26295, 26296, 26297, 26298, 26299, 26300); Fiumara avena (albidona-amendolara, cosenza), greto ciottoloso, 17 m, 27 May 2018, L. Bernardo & D. Gargano s.n. (cLu nos. 26280, 26281, 26282, 26283, 26284, 26285).

Onobrychis calabrica Širj. — Italy: Calabria: Gerace, rupi del castello, depositi detritici consolidati alla base di rupi calcarenitiche e arenacee, 475 m, 8 Jun 2018, G. Maiorca & L. Bernardo s.n. (cLu nos. 26260, 26261, 26262, 26263, 26264, 26265, 26266, 26267, 26268, 26269, 26270, 26271, 26272, 26273, 26274, 26275, 26276, 26277, 26278, 26279).

Onobrychis supina (chaix ex vill.) dc. — Italy: Liguria: Bordighera, 18 Jun 1897, C. Bicknell s.n. (Fi [2 sheets]); Bordighera, in aridis collium, 60 m., solo conglomeratico, 2 Jun 1912, C. Bicknell & L. Pollini s.n. (Fi [3 sheets]); in pascuis prope Genuam, Jun 1876, H. Groves s.n. (Fi [2 sheets]). — France: Frequentissima nei luoghi aridi di Mentone, 1851, Ardoino s.n. (Fi); Mentone, in aridis frequens, 1851, Ardoino s.n. (Fi); col de Glaise près Gap, Hautes-alpes, 12 Jul 1868, A. Burle s.n. (Fi [2 sheets]); aveyron, saint-paul-des-Fonts, coteaux, 500 m, 14 Jun 1903, H. Coste s.n. (Fi [2 sheets]); Hyères, prope carcassonne (Gallia mediterr.), in collibus incultis, 22 Mai 1876, S. Sommier s.n. (Fi); Montagnes du Luc, […] (var), 27 apr 1873, [without collector or number] (Fi); Montagne de la cisé près carcassonne, 17 Jun 1864, Gaudesfroy s.n. (Fi); alzon (Gard), 29 Jun 1863, Le Jolis s.n. (Fi); crest (drôme), taillis, 1 Jun 1870, J. Hervier-Basson s.n. (pi); alzon (Gard), 29 Jun 1863, [collector's name illegible] s.n. (pi).

© 2020 The Authors · This open-access article is distributed under the CC BY 4.0 licence
Liliana Bernardo, Giovanni Maiorca, Jacopo Franzoni, Francesco Roma-Marzio, and Lorenzo Peruzzi "A morphometric and karyological study of Onobrychis calabrica (Fabaceae), a neglected species endemic to Calabria, S Italy," Willdenowia 50(2), 217-224, (22 May 2020).
Received: 15 January 2020; Accepted: 9 April 2020; Published: 22 May 2020

Get copyright permission
Back to Top