Neotypification of the Linnaean name Iris variegata (Iridaceae)

Abstract: The typification of the Linnaean name Iris variegata (Iridaceae) is discussed. Because no original material of the name is known to exist, a neotype is designated. To facilitate further detection and identification of the species, supporting illustrations of the neotype specimen and the living plant in habitat are provided. Citation: Boltenkov E. V. & Mesterházy A. 2020: Neotypification of the Linnaean name Iris variegata (Iridaceae). – Willdenowia 50: 235–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.50.50209 Version of record first published online on 26 May 2020 ahead of inclusion in August 2020 issue.


Introduction
Iris variegata L. is a rhizomatous perennial species mainly native to SC Europe (Hungary, SE Czech Republic, S Slovakia, Austria, SW Germany, Croatia and Serbia), and also to E Europe (W Ukraine) and SE Europe (S Romania, Bulgaria and Albania). It usually grows on dry, rocky slopes, in open woods, at forest edges and in forest-steppe meadows. It can be readily recognized by its flowers with inner perianth segments yellow and outer perianth segments yellow-white, variegated with brown to purple (from which the specific epithet is derived; Fig. 1). It is commonly cultivated as an ornamental plant and is rich in garden forms related to the Miniature Tall Bearded group of irises, with some of them naturalized in Europe (Lynch 1904;Lenz 1978). It is suggested that I. germanica L. and its allied species originated from I. variegata (Dykes 1912;Webb & Chater 1980;Mathew 1989). The basic karyotype of I. variegata appears to be similar to that of the other species of bearded irises with a chromosome count of 2n = 24 (Simonet 1932;Karihaloo & al. 1993).
As a result of the research on the Linnaean names of the genus Iris carried out by the first author (Boltenkov 2016(Boltenkov , 2019Boltenkov & Crespo 2019), it was found that the name I. variegata remains untypified and it is, therefore, investigated here. The goal of this study is to contribute to the stability of scientific nomenclature of I. variegata through typification.

Material and methods
For the typification of Iris variegata, we consulted herbarium specimens deposited at BM, L, LINN, MW and UPS (herbarium codes according to Thiers 2020+). Other collections (H and SBT) were studied using the online 236 Boltenkov & Mesterházy: Neotypification of the Linnaean name Iris variegata

238
Boltenkov & Mesterházy: Neotypification of the Linnaean name Iris variegata herbarium databases. To study the distribution of I. varie gata in Europe, specimens deposited at BM, BP, CGE, E, K, LE and P (digital images) were examined, and relevant literature was reviewed. Some digital images were obtained from the source herbaria: BRNU, P and W. The neotype is designated in accordance with the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. 2018).
As Dykes (1912) rightly pointed out, the indication of this taxon in the Pre-Linnaean literature (e.g. Bauhin 1623; Royen 1740) is based on the collections of Carolus Clusius. In his work, Clusius (1583: 245 -247) provided information about the distribution of this species, to which he applied the polynomial "Iris varia caulifera", noting that the plants were discovered in territories of modern Austria (Stamphenin [Stampfen], Manderstorf [Mannersdorf], and Entzestorf) and W Hungary (Sopronio [Sopron]) and were brought into cultivation in Europe. Based on this information, we can hypothesize that Iris variegata comes not only from Hungary, as indicated in the protologue, but also from Austria. The species was found probably both in the Leitha hills (Leitha-Gebirge), Austria, and the Harka hill (close to Sopron), Hungary, where I. variegata is still common. There is an informative illustration in Clusius's work (1583: 246) which, nevertheless, is not original material for the name, because it was not cited in the protologue (Linnaeus 1753), i.e. Linnaeus did not associate it with the taxon (Turland & al. 2018: Art. 9.4(a)).
There is a specimen in the Linnaean Herbarium at LINN (Herb. Linn. No. 61.5!; image available at http:// linnean-online.org/803/), but it lacks the relevant species number -"4" -from Species plantarum. The specimen is therefore suggested to be a post-1753 addition to Linnaeus's herbarium and consequently cannot be original material for the name (see Jarvis 2007: 46 -47). The Royen phrase name refers to the specimens in the Adriaan van Royen Herbarium (L), but there is no original material associated with this name there. According to Savage (1935), the Burser Herbarium in UPS is important for Linnaeus's interpretation of Bauhin's polynomials, but that herbarium does not contain any specimens associated with Iris names (Juel 1923). No specimens referring to I. variegata were found in the Clifford Herbarium (BM) either, although there is an explicit reference to the dedicated published work, Hortus cliffortianus (Linnaeus 1738), in the protologue. There is no further original material in any of the other herbaria known as having Linnaean specimens (C. Jarvis, pers. comm.).
According to the results of our research, no original material for Iris variegata is known to exist. For this reason, a neotype may be designated (Turland & al. 2018: Art. 9.8, 9.13). We designate a specimen in BP as the neotype of I. variegata. This is a recent, well-prepared specimen; it matches the description in the protologue and is also consistent with the traditional concept and current application of the name I. variegata (e.g. Lynch 1904;Dykes 1912;Webb & Chater 1980;Mathew 1989). The choice is also congruent with the provenance indicated in the protologue.