Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2000 Genetic Divergence of Japanese Turbellarians, Studied by Comparisons of Partial 18S rRNA Gene Sequences. I. On Representatives of Dendrocoelidae (Platyhelminthes: Tricladida: Paludicola)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study obtained 18S rDNA sequence data to investigate the extent of genetic divergence in the Japanese dendrocoelid group, and applied the data to the estimation of phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy. The sequence data, consisting of 558 base positions in an aligned data set, were obtained by using the polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing. For comparative analysis, the 18S rRNA gene sequence data on dendrocoelids from different distant geographical places (Europe, Lake Baikal in Siberia, Kamchatka) published previously were used. Such analysis showed that: (1) Bdellocephala species from Japan, Kamchatka and Lake Baikal are closely related ; (2) Japanese species classified within the genus Dendrocoelopsis do not form a single cluster of closely related organisms; (3) Dendrocoelopsis ichikawai differs minimally from Bdellocephala baicalensis (from Lake Baikal), reliably groups with all Bdellocephala, and should therefore be classed with this genus.

Taxonomic conclusions. (1) The genus Dendrocoelopsis should be revised after molecular typification of European and American representatives. (2) The current generic status of D. ichikawai based on the presence of a well-developed penis papilla should be reconsidered. (3) Sequence divergence amongst representatives of B. brunnea indicates that representatives should be closely examined for the presence of morphological characters by which they might be distinguished.

INTRODUCTION

Within the territories of Japan, the family Dendrocoelidae Hallez, 1893, comprises seven valid, all monotypic, species -three of Bdellocephala De Man, 1875 and four of Dendrocoelopsis Kenk, 1930 : B. annandalei Ijima and Kaburaki, 1916; B. brunnea Ijima and Kaburaki, 1916; B. borealis Kawakatsu, 1978; D. lactea Ichikawa and Okugawa, 1958; D. ezensis Ichikawa and Okugawa, 1958; D. ichikawai Kawakatsu, 1977; D. kishidai Kawakatsu, 1978.

In terms of geographical distribution, Japanese dendrocoelids may be roughly classified under two types, widespread or confined to a unique locality. In the former we place three species D. lactea, D. ezensis and B. brunnea (“comparatively wide” and “wide” spread species according to Kawakatsu et al., 1967). The others may be regarded as phylopatric species, exhibiting a tendency to remain in the native locality and showing little capacity to spread or disperse (for more detailed distribution data on the Japanese dendrocoelid species, see Kawakatsu, 1965,1967,1969,1974).

The real number of phylopatric species is likely to be considerably higher. Zoological collections often contain unique immature specimens that have not been recognised or named (not only on the species but the generic level) because they lack sexual characters. We know two published cases that record such specimens: Dendrocoelopsis? sp. from Lake Biwako (Kawakatsu, 1966) and a dendrocoelid specimen from Middle Honshu (Nakano et al., 1976).

The discovery of D. kishidai provides a dramatic example of a missing, unknown species of rare occurrence. This species was discovered by Dr. Kawakatsu after close re-examination of dendrocoelid material accumulated over 25 years in his laboratory. It had initially been assigned to B. brunnea species due to the similarity of its body shape (Kawakatsu et al., 1978).

Other unidentified and undescribed dendrocoelid forms, the taxonomical positions of which have not been clarified, should also be considered as potentially new species, for example: Bdellocephala sp. from Lake Biwa-ko (Teshirogi et al., 1982; Yagihashi et al., 1995), and two dendrocoelid forms from Shingenji Temple and Sakanoshita in Wakkanai City characterized by unique karyotypes (Nishitani, 1998). On the other hand, Bdellocephala sp. from Lake Biwako is also considered as a juvenile form of B. annandalei (Oki et al., 1998).

It is therefore apparent that there are some ambiguities in the taxonomic assignment of dendrocoelid specimens, not only to species positions but to generic ones as well. These ambiguities cause unique taxonomic and/or zoogeographical data to be lost or unusable for a long time.

Application of karyology to the identification of unusual specimens does not always result in unambiguous taxonomic assessment (see, for example, Nishitani, 1998).

The present paper examines genetic divergence between Japanese dendrocoelids, based on 18S rDNA sequence data. It evaluates the extent of this genetic divergence in the context of species diversity, phylogenetic relationships, and taxonomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples and DNA isolation

Dendrocoelids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Total DNA from 21 living specimens was extracted according to de Vos and Dick (1988).

Table 1

Dendrocoelid species sampled for this study

i0289-0003-17-4-491-t01.gif

Amplification of target rDNA

Two primers (Kuznedelov et al., 1996), namely 5′-TACCT GGTTGATCCTGCCAGTA-3′ and 5′-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGC ACC-3′ homologous to nucleotide positions 1 to 22 and 630 to 610, respectively, of the human 18S rRNA, were used for amplification of target rDNA fragments by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The PCR was performed in a 20-microL mixture containing PCR-buffer, 0.2 mmol/L each dNTP, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (all from TaKaRa Shuzo Co.,Ltd.), 10 picomoles each primer, and 1–50 ng total DNA. The PCR was carried out with 31 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 60 sec, annealing at 55°C for 70 sec, and extention at 74°C for 2.5 min in Gene Amp PCR System 9600 (PERKIN ELMER).

Sequence determination

PCR-amplified DNA fragments, first purified with Wizard PCR Preps DNA Purification System (Promega), were subjected to sequencing by the dideoxynucleotide-terminated Sanger's method (Sanger et al., 1977) according to Murray (1989). Sequencing reactions were performed with RPN 2440 (or 2444) Thermo Sequenase kits (Vistra systems) according to the protocols “Dye-primer 2-step cycle sequencing” and “Direct loading”. DNA fragments were sequenced in both directions with the PCR-primers labelled by Texas Red (Nippon Flour Mills Co.,Ltd.). The products of the sequencing reactions were analysed using a Hitachi SQ-5500 sequencer machine according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Sequence data analysis

Sequences were aligned by eye and identified with published planarian sequences (see below).

Secondary structures were reconstructed according to the models for eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA published by Gutell et al. (1985) and used to infer positional homology for ambiguous nucleotide characters in the highly variable regions, especially those containing deletions or insertions.

For comparative analysis, previously published 18S rRNA gene sequence data on the following planarians from Japan, Kamchatka, Lake Baikal (the last two in Russia), and Europe were used: Bdellocephala brunnea (from Fukushima Pref., Japan), B. annandalei (Lake Biwa-ko, Japan), B. a. angarensis (Gerstfeldt, 1958), B. melanocinerea (Korotnev, 1912), B. bathyalis (Lake Biwa-ko, Japan) Timoshkin and Porfirjeva, 1989, Armilla livanovi Kenk, 1974, Protocotylus flavus Korotnev, 1908 —all from Lake Baikal (Kuznedelov et al., 1996); B. parva Zabusova, 1936 from Kamchatka (Kuznedelov et al., 1997), Dendrocoelum lacteum (Müller, 1774) from Europe (accession number  M58346), B. baicalensis (Zabusov, 1903) (Y18763), Bdellocephala sp. (Y18764)— the two last from Lake Baikal.

Comparative analysis was carried out with the PHYLIP package (Felsenstein, 1993). Evolutionary distances were calculated by the Kimura “2-parameter” model of nucleotide substitution (1980). An unrooted tree was constructed by the algorithm of Saitou and Nei (1987) from a pairwise distance matrix. A confidence interval on a set of species was measured by the bootstrap resampling method (Felsenstein, 1985) using 1000 bootstrap replications.

In addition to the distance-matrix method, we used maximum -parsimony (MP) and maximum-likelihood (ML) methods, simulated by the computer programs DNAPARS in the PHYLIP package (Felsenstein, 1993) and PUZZLE (Strimmer and von Haeseler, 1997), respectively.

RESULTS

Individuals of five species (Table 1) from the family Dendrocoelidae were used to study genetic divergence in nucleotide sequences in the 5′-end domain of the 18S rRNA. Although sequence data from B. brunnea were already available (Kuznedelov et al., 1996), they were based on a single specimen (from Fukushima Pref.). Furthermore, the sequence of B. brunnea specimens that we collected from Hirosaki City (Aomori Pref.) was found to differ from that of the specimen from Fukushima Prefecture. To clarify this confusion, we used B. brunnea specimens from four localities (Table 1).

Sequence data

Readable DNA direct sequencing data are shown in Figure 1. These sequences were identified with published planarian 18S rRNA gene sequences. There were variations in the sequence length caused by insertions or deletions within the aligned regions.

Fig. 1

Alignment of 5 sequences of the 5′-end portion of the 18S rRNA gene from dendrocoelid species listed in Table1. Dots in each base position indicate nucleotides identical to the top one belonging to D. ezensis. Dashs mean deletions.

i0289-0003-17-4-491-f01.gif

Among the five dendrocoelid species, including representatives of four populations of B. brunnea, there are five variability types: (I) D. ezensis; (II) D. lactea; (III) D. ichikawai; (IV) B. brunnea (Fukushima Pref.); (V) B. brunnea (from the other localities, see Table 1), and B. borealis. The taxa belonging to the same variability type have identical sequences. B. annandalei from Lake Biwa-ko belongs to type V, having an identical sequence (Kuznedelov et al., 1996). The new sequence data on B. brunnea specimens from Fukushima Pref. are identical with those obtained earlier from a single specimen (Kuznedelov et al., 1996).

Here, it is worth noting that the previously published 18S rRNA sequence data on D. lactea (Katayama et al., 1996) differ from ours by five base positions, the character states in three of which are in explicit contradiction with the 18S rRNA secondary structure.

Comparative analysis

To more fully establish the relationships between Japanese dendrocoelids, our data were compared with previously published 18S rRNA sequence data on dendrocoelids from different distant geographical places (Europe, Lake Baikal, Kamchatka).

As it was found earlier, the sequence data on B. parva from Kamchatka (Russia) are identical to those on B. annandalei (Kuznedelov et al., 1997). B. parva, therefore, also shares the 5th variability type. Thus, in the dendrogram depicting degrees of relationships between dendrocoelids (Fig. 2), the terminal node assigned to B. brunnea corresponds also to B. borealis, B. annandelei, and B. parva. The other tip corresponding to Japanese Bdellocephala is that assigned to B. brunnea Fuk.(a single population from Fukushima Prefecture). Both the OTUs (operational taxonomic units) occurred inside a monophyletic group, consisting of all the Bdellocephala species, with high statistical support (100%).

Fig. 2

Unrooted consensus tree with numbers indicating bootstrapping estimates (%). Numbers in parentheses indicate the MP and ML bootstrapping estimates. The scale means that line length equalizes to 0.01 evolutionary distance calculated by Kimura's formula (1980). The branch tree length is corresponded to the evolutionary distances between species by this scale.

i0289-0003-17-4-491-f02.gif

On the other hand, representatives of the genus Dendrocoelopsis are scattered across the tree and do not form a single monophyletic cluster. D. ichikawai is reliably (100%) placed apart from the other species of Dendrocoelopsis, clustering with the Bdellocephala group, showing close affinity with Baikalian B. baicalensis. For this reason the species can be classed with the genus Bdellocephala. As may be seen from the dendrogram, D. lactea and D.ezensis occur as separated lineages not having a common direct ancestral node. Their ancestral nodes are separated from each other by the 56% bootstrapped internal branch.

The Bootstrap approach used here allowed us to estimate the probability that some species groups of interest represented monophyletic ones, although they were not included in the (resulting) consensus tree. On the basis that it occurs in only 0.1% (less than 5%, Felsenstein, 1985) of the bootstrap estimates, we can hereby reject the monophyly of the Dendrocoelopsis group, consisting of three species (D. lactea, D. ezensis, D. ichikawai). Monophyly of the group D. lactea and D. ezensis is supported at the 12% level (more than 5%) and thus should not be rejected as an alternative to the corresponding subsets included in the consensus tree.

The MP and ML consensus trees had the same configuration as the distance-matrix one, although the bootstrap estimated differed (see Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION

We obtained sequence data from the 18S rDNA locus of a number of representatives of the Japanese dendrocoelid group, and evaluated the data obtained in relation to some questions of species diversity, phylogenetic relationships, and taxonomy.

Although there are a number of limitations to the application of this DNA fragment for these objectives, we can, nevertheless, draw some conclusions concerning the aspects under consideration.

Species diversity

The use of 18S rRNA sequence data (especially partial) to discriminate species, especially closely related ones, is limited by the evolutionary conservation of this sequence constrained by the ribosome structural and functional requirements. Indeed, all described Japanese Bdellocephala species (except B. brunnea from Fukushima Pref.), despite clear morphological and ecological differences between them, shared the identical target sequence, i.e. they were unresolved by this sequence. However, precisely because of this degree of conservation, sequence divergence should be interpreted as indicative of speciation. In this context, the genetic heterogeneity of a widespread species from different localities may imply that we are dealing here with divergent species.

Thus, representatives of B. brunnea from four localities that clearly split into two sequence variants may belong to two separate species.

Phylogenetic relationships

Inferring phylogenetic relationships from molecular data requires sufficient variation between species under comparison. The extent of genetic divergence within the Japanese dendrocoelids is extreme. The differentiation between Dendrocoelopsis species was maximal, while sequence differences between Bdellocephala species were absent (except for the B. brunnea population from Fukushima Pref.).

Comparative analysis with non-Japanese dendrocoelids (from Europe, Lake Baikal, and Kamchatka) showed three principal things: (1) Bdellocephala species from Japan, Kamchatka and Lake Baikal have very close relationships and show well-marked distributional patterns; (2) species from the genus Dendrocoelopsis do not form a single cluster of closely related organisms; (3) Dendrocoelopsis ichikawai, differs minimally from Bdellocephala baicalensis (from Lake Baikal), groups reliably with all Bdellocephala, and should, therefore, be classed with this genus.

Taxonomy

The taxonomic status of Dendrocoelopsis ichikawai should be changed in the light of the above phylogenetic analysis indicating a position within the genus Bdellocephala. The maximal sequence similarity between D. ichikawai and B. baikalensis makes it appropriate to reconsider their morphological similarities. Actually, Dr. Masaharu Kawakatsu (Kawakatsu et al., 1977) stated that the external appearance of B. baicalensis was very similar to that of the new Japanese form (i.e. D. ichikawai), and that the anatomical structure of the copulatory apparatus of these species revealed some similarity (p. 211). However, based on the presence of a well -developed penis papilla in the new species, he excluded it from the genus Bdellocephala (penis papilla is absent) and classified it with Dendrocoelopsis. This viewpoint was supported by Kenk on the same basis (Kawakatsu et al., 1977).

Another taxonomic point concerning the genus Bdellocephala relates to the separation of B. brunnea representatives, on the basis of sequence divergence, into two groups: (1) from Aomori (two localities) and Nagano Pref., and (2) from Fukushima Pref. The groups may justify classification into different species. However, this point should be given more attention in terms of morphological examination for a set of specific characters by which they can be distinguished. We will discuss this point further in a separate paper.

The separate taxonomic status of the other species of Japanese Dendrocoelopsis (D. ezensis and D. lactea) seems to be justified, because they exhibit a high level of sequence divergence from one another. This level is approximately twice that found between one European and two Baikalian dendrocoelids (all from different genera).

On the other hand, Kenk's (1930) diagnosis of the genus Dendrocoelopsis Kenk, 1930, was developed to separate D. spinosipenis (Kenk, 1925) from the genus Dendrocoelum Örsted, 1844, and contained the following points: no adenodactyl; well-developed penis papilla; penis bulb of ordinary structure; oviducts unite without embracing bursa stalk; testicular zone extending to behind the copulatory apparatus; anterior end with subterminal true sucker; eyes not multiple. Later, the diagnosis was amended by omitting the three last-named points in which some new species (described under a new genus – Amyadenium de Beauchamp, 1931) classed with Dendrocoelopsis by Kenk (1953, pp. 177–178) showed differences from D. spinosipenis de Beauchamp (1931) recognized the close relationship of Amyadenium to Dendrocoelopsis, but separated it from the latter, based on the absence of a highly complex grasping organ, or true sucker (i.e., an adhesive organ separated from the surrounding mesenchyme by a muscle layer).

Within the genus Dendrocoelopsis there have been observed two species groups closely related to the Japanese forms. The three pigmented and two-eyed species with an adhesive organ, namely, D. ezensis, D. piriformis Kenk, 1953, from Alaska, and D. vaginata Hyman, 1935, from the northwestern part of the United States resemble each other rather closely in their external appearance (Ichikawa and Okugawa, 1958; Kenk, 1973), and show similar external appearance to the representatives of the genus Bdellocephala, particularly in the head region (Kenk, 1953; Ichikawa and Okugawa, 1958). Apart from the lack of a grasping or adhesive organ, D. lactea bears some resemblances to D. alaskensis in color, shape and size of the body, the supernumerary eyes and the ventral position of the testes (Ichikawa and Okugawa, 1958). In view of the distributional patterns of the four species (D. ezensis, D. lactea, D. piriformis and D. alaskensis) on each side of the North Pacific and their morphological features, it seems possible to consider each of the groups as a natural phyletic unit. On the other hand, it is doubtful whether these groups should be classified within the same genus, considering the high level of the genetic divergence between D. ezensis and D. lactea. Hence, the genus Dendrocoelopsis should be revised, based on the molecular typification of the genus representatives.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our sincere thanks to Dr. Takashige Sakurai of Fukushima Biomedical Institute of Environmental and Neoplastic Diseases, Mr. Masahiko Sato of Rishiri Town Museum, Mr. Toshio Hoshino and Mr. Masaaki Sakurai of Synthetic Environment Research & Planning Institute Co., Ltd. for their help in the collection of materials. A part of this study was conducted at the Gene Research Center and Muto's laboratory, Hirosaki University. We also wish to express our gratitude to Dr. Shinji Akada and Dr. Mineo Senda of this Center, and Prof. Dr. Akira Muto for their useful advice and kind help during our use of the Center and his laboratory. We thank Miss Kyoko Hanawa and Mr. Takeshi Fujii of Hirosaki University for their technical assistance. We are also indebted to Dr. Nikki A. Watson (University of New England) who kindly edited an earlier draft of this paper and provided useful comments that improved the manuscript.

This study was supported by the Academic Fund of Hirosaki University, 1998 and a grant from Rishiri Town Museum, 1998.

REFERENCES

  1. P. de Beauchamp 1931. Nouvelles diagnoses de Triclades obscuricoles, IV: Essai d'une classification des Dendrocoelidae. Bull Soc Zool France 55:155–163. Google Scholar

  2. J. Felsenstein 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791. Google Scholar

  3. J. Felsenstein 1993. PHYLIP Version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington. Seattle. Google Scholar

  4. G. Gerstfeldt 1858. Ueber einige zum Theil neue Arten Platoden, Anneliden, Myriapoden and Crustaceen Sibirien's, namentlich seines östlichen Theiles und des Amur-Gebietes. Mém prés Acad. imp Sci St.- Pétersbourg 8:259–296. Google Scholar

  5. R. R. Gutell, C. R. Woese, and H. F. Noller . 1985. Comparative anatomy of 16-S-like ribosomal RNA. Prog Nucleic Acids Res Mol Biol 32:155–216. Google Scholar

  6. P. Hallez 1893. Catalogue des Turbellariés (Rhabdocoelids, Triclades et Polyclades) du Nord de la France & de la Côte Boulonnaise, Ordre II, etc. Rev Biol du Nord France V:4135–145. Google Scholar

  7. L. H. Hyman 1935. Studies on the morphology, taxonomy, and distribution of North American Triclad Turbellaria, VI: A new Dendrocoelid from Montana, Dendrocoelopsis vaginatus n. sp. Trans Amer Micros Soc 54:338–345. Google Scholar

  8. A. Ichikawa and K. I. Okugawa . 1958. Studies on probursalian (fresh-water triclads) of Hokkaido. I. On two new species of the genus Dendrocoelopsis Kenk, D. lacteus and D. ezensis. Bull Kyoto Gakugei Univ, B 12:9–18. pls. 1–5. Google Scholar

  9. I. Ijima and T. Kaburaki . 1916. Preliminary descriptions of some Japanese triclads. Annot Zool Japon 9:153–171. Google Scholar

  10. T. Katayama, M. Nishioka, and M. Yamamoto . 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among turbellarian orders inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Zool Sci 13:747–756. Google Scholar

  11. M. Kawakatsu 1965. On the ecology and distribution of freshwater planarians in the Japanese Islands, with special reference to their vertical distribution. Hydrobiologia 26:349–408. Google Scholar

  12. M. Kawakatsu 1966. Japanese freshwater planarians. The Heredity, Tokyo 20:54–57. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

  13. M. Kawakatsu 1967. On the ecology and distribution of freshwater planarians in the Japanese Islands, with special reference to their vertical distribution (Revised Edition). Bull Fuji Women's College 5:117–177. Google Scholar

  14. M. Kawakatsu 1969. An illustrated list of Japanese freshwater planarians in color. Bull Fuji Women's College 7:II45–91. pls VIIVIII. Google Scholar

  15. M. Kawakatsu 1974. Further studies on the vertical distribution of freshwater planarians in the Japanese Islands. In “Libbie H Hyman Memorial Volume: Biology of the Turbellaria”. Eds by N. W. Riser and M. P. Morse , editors. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York. pp. 291–338. Google Scholar

  16. M. Kawakatsu, E. Asai, and T. Yamada . 1977. Dendrocoelopsis ichikawai sp. nov., a new freshwater planarian from Rishiri Island in Hokkaido. Bull Natn Sci Mus, A (Zool) 3:199–217. Google Scholar

  17. M. Kawakatsu, E. Asai, and T. Yamada . 1978. Bdellocephala borealis sp. nov., a new freshwater planarian from Rishiri and Okushiri islands off Hokkaido. Bull Natn Sci Mus A (Zool) 4:79–98. Google Scholar

  18. M. Kawakatsu, G. Ogawara, and Y. Tarui . 1978. Dendrocoelopsis kishidai sp. nov., a new freshwater planarian from Kyoto, the Kinki district, Honshu. Annot Zool Japon 51:146–154. Google Scholar

  19. M. Kawakatsu and T. Yamada . 1966. Planarians collected from Hime-numa in Rishiri Island, Hokkaido. Collect Breed, Tokyo 28:375–379. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

  20. M. Kawakatsu, T. Yamada, and S. Iwaki . 1967. Environment and reproduction in Japanese freshwater planarians. Jap J Ecol 17:263–266. Google Scholar

  21. R. Kenk 1925. Zur Anatomie von Dendrocoelum spinosipenis Kenk (Turbellaria, Tricladida). Zool Anz 63:131–146. Google Scholar

  22. R. Kenk 1930. Beitrage zum System der Probursalier (Tricladida Paludicola). Zool Anz 89:145–162.289–302. Google Scholar

  23. R. Kenk 1953. The fresh-water triclads of Alaska. Proc US Natn Mus 103:163–186. pls. 6–8. Google Scholar

  24. R. Kenk 1973. Freshwater triclads (Turbellaria) of North America, VI: The genus Dendrocoelopsis. Smiths Contr Zool 138:i–iii.1–16. Google Scholar

  25. M. Kimura 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. Google Scholar

  26. A. A. Korotnev 1908. Einiges über die Tricladenfauna des Baikal-sees. Zool Anz 33:625–629. Google Scholar

  27. A. A. Korotnev 1912. Die Planarien des Baikal-Sees (Tricladen) systematisch, anatomisch und zoogeographisch bearbeitet. In. “Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse einer zoologischen Expedition nach dem Baikalsee… 1900 bis 1902. 5:1–28. pls. I–VII Kommissions-Verlag von R. Friedländer & Sohn. Kiew und Berlin. Google Scholar

  28. K. D. Kuznedelov, O. A. Timoshkin, and E. Goldman . 1997. Genetic divergence of Asiatic Bdellocephala (Turbellaria, Tricladida, Paludicola) as revealed by partial 18S rRNA gene sequence comparisons. Zhur Obshch Biol 58:85–93. Google Scholar

  29. K. D. Kuznedelov, O. A. Timoshkin, and V. P. Kumarev . 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of triclades (Turbellaria, Tricladida, Paludicola) of Lake Baikal deduced from 18S rRNA sequence data. Mol Biol 30:792–797. Google Scholar

  30. J. G. de Man 1875. Overzicht der tot dusverre in de zoete wateren van Europa waargenomen Turbellaria. Tijdschr der Nederl Dierkund Vereen 1:86–107. Google Scholar

  31. O. F. Müller 1774. Verminum terrestrium et fluviatilium, seu animalium infusoriorum, helminthicorum, et testaceorum, non marinorum, succincta historia. 1:21–72. and index Havniae & Lipsiae. Google Scholar

  32. V. Murray 1989. Improved double-stranded DNA sequencing using the linear polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res 21:88–89. Google Scholar

  33. M. Nakano, Y. Yamazaki, and Y. Mukaibara . 1976. Notes on freshwater planarians found in the vicinity of Toyo'oka City, Hyôgo Prefecture, Honshû. (with an appendix written by M. Kawakatsu). Collect Breed. Tokyo. 38:347–350. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

  34. S. Nishitani 1998. Chap. 2 Karyotypes and chromosomal evolution of freshwater planarians. In “Morpho-differentiation in planarians”. Ed by W. Teshirogi and K. Watanabe , editors. Kyoritsu Shuppan Co. Tokyo. pp. 29–41. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

  35. I. Oki, S. Tamura, M. Nishino, M. Takai, K. D. Kuznedelov, O. A. Timoshkin, and M. Kawakatsu . 1998. Chromosomes of Phagocata kawakatsui and Bdellocephala annandalei from Lake Biwa-ko in Honshû, central Japan. Hydrobiologia 383:315–320. Google Scholar

  36. A. S. Örsted 1844. Entwurf einer systematischen Eintheilung und speciellen Beschreibung der Plattwürmer, auf microscopische Untersuchungen gegründet. viii + 96:pp. 3. pls. Copenhagen. Google Scholar

  37. N. Saitou and M. Nei . 1987. The neigbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. Google Scholar

  38. F. Sanger, S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulsen . 1977. DNA sequencing with chain termination inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467. Google Scholar

  39. K. Strimmer and A. von Haeseler . 1997. PUZZLE Version 4.0. Zoologisches Institut, Universitaet Muenchen. Muenchen. Google Scholar

  40. W. Teshirogi, M. Yagihashi, and S. Ishida . 1982. Notes on the two freshwater planarians, Bdellocephala annandalei and Bdellocephala sp. from Lake Biwa-ko. Collect Breed, Tokyo 44:43–47. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

  41. O. A. Timoshkin and N. A. Porfirjeva . 1989. Glubokovodnye planarii–Giganty oz. Baikal. In “Fauna Baikala: Chervi, Molliuski, Chlenistonogie”. Ed by A. A. Linevich , editor. Akad Nauk SSSR, SOINT, Limnol. Inst. Nauka, Novosibirsk. pp. 7–23. (In Russian). Google Scholar

  42. T. de Vos and T. A. Dick . 1988. Differentiation between Diphyllobotrium dendriticum and D. latum using isozymes, restriction profiles and ribosomal gene probes. Syst Parasitol 13:161–166. Google Scholar

  43. M. Yagihashi, K. Tanaka, S. Ishida, and W. Teshirogi . 1995. Comparative studies on the karyotype, regeneration and morphology in three species of genus Bdellocephala. Sci Rep Hirosaki Univ 42:183–194. Google Scholar

  44. I. P. Zabusov 1903. Zamietki po morfologii i sistematikie Tricladida. IV. Pervyi predvaritel'nyi otchet o planariiakh oz. Baikala, sobrannykh V. P. Gariaevym. Trudy Obshch Estestvoisp Imp Kazanskom Univ 36:61–58. 1 pl (In Russian, with German summary). Google Scholar

  45. Z. I. Zabusova 1936. Planarii Kamchatki. Kazanskii Gosud Univ, Uchenye Zapiski, Zool 96:7141–174. (In Russian, with French summary). Google Scholar

Konstantin D. Kuznedelov, Sachiko Ishida, and Shin-ichiro Nishitani "Genetic Divergence of Japanese Turbellarians, Studied by Comparisons of Partial 18S rRNA Gene Sequences. I. On Representatives of Dendrocoelidae (Platyhelminthes: Tricladida: Paludicola)," Zoological Science 17(4), (1 May 2000). https://doi.org/10.2108/0289-0003(2000)17[491:GDOJTS]2.0.CO;2
Received: 16 August 1999; Accepted: 1 November 1999; Published: 1 May 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top