Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 August 2001 Circadian Rhythm and cDNA Cloning of the Clock Gene period in the Honeybee Apis cerana japonica
Isamu Shimizu, Yutaka Kawai, Masanori Taniguchi, Setsuyuki Aoki
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Isolated individual foragers of Apis cerana japonica could be entrained under a light-dark cycle, and the predominant activity was concentrated to the later part of the photophase. Foragers showed circadian rhythm under conditions of constant light and constant dark with free-running periods of more and less than 24 hr, respectively. These observations indicated that A. cerana possesses a circadian clock controlling locomotor activity. To investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the circadian system we cloned cDNA for a homolog of the clock gene period (per) from the honeybee by a PCR-strategy. The cloned percDNAs consisted of two types, α and β, encoding a putative protein of 1124 amino acids and 1116 amino acids, respectively. The sequences of types α and β were identical except that the former possessed an additional 24 bp stretch corresponding to 8 amino acids in the conserved C2 block. These two types were assumed to be differentially spliced variants and found also in per cDNA of A. mellifera. In support of this idea, Southern blotting experiments showed that per of A. cerana is a single copy gene. RT-PCR analysis and subcloning of the products revealed that the both types α and β are expressed in the brain of the forager. A quantitative RT-PCR assay by which the level of per mRNA in one single brain can be detected was established. Per mRNA level showed daily oscillation under a light-dark cycle with a change of the ratio of type α to β.

INTRODUCTION

Many organisms including unicellular organisms have been shown to possess endogenous circadian clocks that provide temporal synchronization of life processes and adaptation of organisms to environmental cycles (Aschoff, 1960; Decoursey, 1983). Circadian rhythms driven by these clocks oscillate with a free-running period of about 24 hr under constant environmental condition (Pittendrigh, 1981; Saunders, 1982). The molecular mechanisms responsible for these circadian clocks are under extensive investigation using many organisms including insects (Giebultowicz, 1999) and several genes of the components constructing the clocks have been identified (Dunlap, 1999). Our knowledge about the mechanisms comes largely from genetic and biochemical studies in the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster. The first clock gene, period (per), an essential component of the circadian clock machinery, was originally cloned in Drosophila (Zehring et al., 1984; Bargiello et al., 1984). The period gene was extensively characterized, and the molecular mechanism of the Drosophila clock is generally thought to be based on negative feedback in which transcription of the per gene is regulated by its protein product PER (Dunlap, 1999). Rhythmic expression of the per gene caused by this feedback regulation has been proposed to be the main mechanism generating daily rhythmicity in Drosophila. In another insect, the moth Antheraea pernyi, per was also cloned and its function was analyzed (Reppert et al., 1994; Levine et al., 1995; Sauman et al., 1996a, 1996b). The silkmoth per gene is also a necessary element of the circadian system (Sauman et al., 1996b), although the molecular details of per expression and regulation are different between the silkmoth and fruitfly (Sauman et al., 1996a). Recently, per genes were cloned and investigated in Musca domestica and Lucilia cuprina, dipteran species other than Drosophila (Piccin et al., 2000; Warman et al., 2000). Mammalian per genes have been cloned (Dunlap, 1999), and the gene products were shown to constitute a molecular circuit with other clock components such as Timeless, Clock and BMAL1, which are also common among fruitflies and mammals (Dunlap, 1999). Thus, isolation and analysis of the per gene has been critical to understanding the molecular mechanisms of circadian systems of insects and mammals.

It was reported that honeybees (Apis mellifera) showed distinct free-running rhythms in activity at the level of individual and also at the colony level. The circadian activity rhythm of individual forager honeybees has been well investigated and the free-running period of less than 24 hr under constant darkness (DD) and greater than that under constant light (LL) have been observed (Spangler, 1973; Moore and Rankin, 1985). The circadian rhythm can be entrained to light-dark and temperature cycles (Moore and Rankin, 1985; 1993). In addition to these physical conditions, feeding cycles and social interaction also influence the circadian rhythms represented by colonies (Frisch and Aschoff, 1987; Moritz and Kryger, 1994; Moritz and Sakofski, 1991; Frisch and Koeniger, 1994). For example, introduction of a queen into a worker group that was entrained to a phase-shifted light/dark cycle caused a shift of the free-running phase under DD conditions (Moritz and Sakofski, 1991). The ontogenic development of circadian activity was reported in honeybee workers: the newly emerged bees had no circadian rhythm but the aged foragers showed a clear rhythm (Moore et al., 1998; Sasaki, 1992). Further the endogenous circadian system of Apis is involved in sun compass and “time memory” which enables bees to remember the time of the day at which nectar sources are available (Saunders, 1982).

Though circadian phenomena of the honeybee have been well investigated from several points of view, the molecular mechanisms underlying the circadian rhythm have not been revealed. But recently Toma et al. (2000) reported the cloning of the per cDNA in A. mellifera (GenBank:  AF159569) and the circadian change in period mRNA levels in the brain. In the present study we report the rhythms shown by individuals of A. cerana japonica, which is endemic in Japan and shows ecological characteristics different from A. mellifera (Sasaki, 1999). In order to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the circadian system of A. cerana, we cloned cDNAs showing a homology to per gene sequences of other insects and examined the expression of per mRNA in the brain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Honeybees

A. cerana japonica was used in this study, unless otherwise stated. Honeybees (A.cerana) maintained at Tamagawa University were used to extract total RNA. The honeybees of the colonies, collected at Osaka Prefecture (Japan) and reared in the botanical garden of Kyoto University (Kyoto), were used in other experiments including the recording of locomotor rhythms.

One colony containing about 3000 workers and queen was maintained in an insect tron (Zootron, Amefrec, Co., Ltd. Tokyo) which was devised for rearing honeybees under indoor condition. The temperature (28°C) and relative humidity (60%) in the tron were kept constant throughout the experiments. The light-dark cycle was programmed to LD 12:12 with an intensity of about 3000 lux of photo-phase. Sugar water was supplied ad libitum. After the bees were entrained at least one week, the foragers visting the sugar dish were captured and used for the analysis of per mRNA expression.

Recording of individual locomotor rhythm

Foragers were captured at the entrance of the hives and single bees were kept in semi-transparent plastic boxes (6 ×9 cm). All experiments were carried out in biotrons (NC220, Nihon-Ika, Osaka, Japan) which were kept at 28°C and 60% RH. The captured bees were kept under a photoperiodic regime of light-dark cycle (LD) 12:12, or kept under constant darkness. Some were kept under constant light (LL) of 200–300 lux of light intensity and then transferred to constant darkness (DD). Food (50% sucrose solution) was available ad libitum. In the photoperiodic regime (LD 12:12) square-wave LD cycles were given by alternating the photophase of fluorescent illumination at 200–300 lux with a scotophase of complete darkness.

Locomotor activities of the individual isolated foragers were monitored using an infrared actograph. An infrared light beam was passed through the box and projected onto a photo-microsensor (EESPW321A, Omron Corp., Tokyo, Japan) which picked up any interruption in the light beam. The momentary signals were fed into a computer (NEC98VX, NEC, Tokyo, Japan) through an interface (48CH-MNT, Adocom Ele. Co. Ltd., Shiga, Japan), and these digitally recorded events were analyzed to estimate the free-running period shown in LL and DD conditions by χ2 periodogram software provided by Dr. I. Ohshima.

cDNA cloning

Degenerate primers were designed on the basis of conserved regions of the insect per genes identified by the alignment of seven insect per sequences (Reppert et al., 1994) and preferential codon usage for Apis was applied. Three primers were successfully used: two sense primers F1 (5′-TG[TC]GT[TAG]AT[TC][AT][GC][ACGT]-ATGCATGA[TC]GG-3′) and F2 (5′-CTGG GATATCT [ACGT] CC[ACGT]CA[AG]GA-3′), and one antisense primer R1 (5′-ATT[AG]TA ATT [ACGT]A [AG]TTGATT-3′).

The heads of workers were obtained and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted from the heads by the acid guanidinium isothiocyanate phenol-chloroform (AGPC) method (Isogen, Nippon gene, Toyama, Japan). Reverse transcription of total RNA from the bee heads was performed by using 5 μg total RNA and 25 units of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (AMV reverse transcriptase first-strand cDNA synthesis kit; Life Sciences, inc., St. Petersburg, FL), in a 25 μl cDNA reaction mixture. One μl of the cDNA was amplified with 1.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo, Kyoto, Japan) using primers F1 and R1 on a DNA thermal cycler model 9600 (Perkin Elmer). The PCR parameters were 30 sec template denaturation at 95°C, 1 min primer annealing at 42°C, 2 min primer extension at 72°C for 30 cycles. The products of this PCR were further amplified using a second set of oligonucleotide primers F2 and R1. The PCR parameters were the same as those of the first PCR. The final PCR products were electrophoresed on 0.7% agar-ose gels, purified by the glass powder method (AGC-001K DNA PREP, Diayatron, Tokyo, Japan), and were cloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega Co., Madison, WI) for sequencing. The sequencing reactions were carried out by the cycle sequencing method with an ABI-373 automatic DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's protocol. All sequences were determined in both directions.

The 3′-terminal portion of period cDNA was cloned by the 3′-RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) method. Seven μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed (Superscript II RNase H Reverse Transcriptase, Life Technologies) using 3′-primer TAP1 (5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3′). The resulting cDNA was amplified using the anchor primer AP1 (5′-GGC CACGCGTCGACTAGTAC-3′) and primer F3 (5′-AGGACCTCGCGTCCTTCATG-3′). The PCR parameters were 30 sec template denaturation at 95°C, 1 min primer annealing at 55°C, 2 min primer extension at 72°C for 30 cycles. The products of this PCR were further amplified using a second set of primers TAP1 and F4 (5′-CACGACAG CGTGATGCTTGG-3′). The amplified 2.3 kb fragment was purified, and cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector.

The 5′-terminal portion of period cDNA was cloned by the 5′-RACE method (5′RACE System for Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends Version 2.0, Gibco BRL, Gaitherburg, MD) using primer GSP1 (5′-TGCTCAGTTGTACATGATACGCGA-3′), GSP2 (5′-ATATCAGGA TTCGCTGGCCCTTTC-3′) and nested GSP (5′-ATCCTGTGTTGACCTACGAC-3′).

Finally, the complete cDNA coding sequences of per (consisting of two types α and β; see the materials and methods) were amplified from the bee head cDNA using two primers F5 (5′-AGCAGTGTTGTGATTCAACGG-3′; -56 to -36, the first nucleotide A of the start codon was numbered +1) and R5 (5′-AA ACAAACGCTTCGAACTGG-3′; +3418 to +3437 [of type α]), which were based on the sequences obtained by 5′- and 3′-RACE, respectively.

Total RNA was prepared from the heads of A. mellifera foragers (Australian strain) and cloning of partial fragments of the per cDNA was performed according to the methods described above. To carry out PCR, two primers were designed on the basis of the decided sequence of cerana: one is sense primer R0 (5′-CTGGTGGTTACTGCTCAACCTGTT-3′) and antisense primer FS (5′-GTTGTAATTTGAGTTGATTGTAA-3′), which are located in the C2 region (Reppert, 1994). PCR, cloning and sequencing were carried out as described above.

Southern blotting analysis of genomic DNA

The cDNA probe of 786 bp was generated with primer R0 (5′-CTGGTGGTTACTGCTCAACCTGTT-3′) and the primer FS (5′-GTTGTAATTGAGTTGATTGTAAC-3′), which are located in C2 region (Reppert et al., 1994), by PCR amplification using subcloned cDNA (type α) as the template. Probes were labeled with random primers and klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase using a random prime labeling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) to obtain fluorescein-labeled DNA probes.

Total genomic DNA was isolated from muscles of A. cerana workers according to the standard method. DNA was digested with EcoRI and HindIII and aliquots of ∼2 μg were separated on 1% agarose gels, transferred onto nylon membranes (Hybond-N+, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and immobilized by UV cross-linking. Hybridization and detection were performed according to the protocol supplied with the detection kit (RPN3510; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with slight modifications. Membrane-bound digested DNA was hybridized in rapid-hybridization buffer and the membranes were washed in 2×SSC for 20 min, 1× SSC for 15 min and 0.5× SSC for 15 min (each buffer contained 0.1% SDS). Following stringent washes, the membranes were incubated with blocking agent and then with anti-fluorescein-AP. The chemiluminescence of the hybridizing band was detected using an ECL instant camera (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Isolation of mRNA and one step RT-PCR

Brains including optic lobes of five foragers were dissected out carefully at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 21:00 during the scotophase of LD 12:12 (Fig. 7), collected together and analysed immediately. mRNA was isolated from the brains using a mRNA purification kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); the procedures included disruption by the guanidium isothiocyanate method and selective isolation of mRNA by oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography. The polyadenylated mRNA was eluted with 200 μl of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5) containing 1mM EDTA. After DNAase treatment of the elution mRNA was precipitated by adding 70% ethanol, collected by centrifugation and finally redis-solved in 40 μl of DEPC-treated water.

One-step RT-PCR was performed using a kit purchased from QIAGEN (Chatsworth, CA) according to manufacturer's protocol. The reaction mixture (50 μl) contained reverse transcriptase, Taq DNA polymerase, dNTP mixtures (400 μM of each dNTP), 0.6 μM oligo-nucleotide primers, 2.5 mM MgCl2, RNase inhibitor (10 units) and 1 μl of mRNA solution obtained by the method described above. First, reverse transcription reaction was performed at 50°C for 30 min, then the mixture was incubated at 95°C for 15 min to activate Taq DNA polymerase, and PCR amplifications were carried out. The PCR parameters were 1 min template denaturation at 94°C, 1 min primer annealing at 50°C, 1 min primer extension at 72°C for 30 cycles.

Selective analysis of the expression of per (α) was performed with primers R0 and FI (5′-CTGTAACAAGGGATTGCGTGATCC-3′) and that of total per (α+β) was with R0 and FD (5′-CTCGGTTGACGATTTGCTGT-3′), respectively (Fig. 4). The sequence of FI is based on the additional 24 bp stretch in the type α cDNA, and R0 and FD are based on sequences common to both types. The amplified ca. 0.7 kb fragment was purified, cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector, and sequenced.

As an internal control, a partial DNA fragment (362 bp in length) of the cerana cytoskeletal actin sequence was amplified by RT-PCR in which primers 1S (5′-GAAATGGCAACTGCTGCATCATCCT-3′) and 3A (5′-AGAATTGACCCACCAATCCATACG-3′) based on the cytoskeletal actin sequence of A. mellifera (GenBank:  AB023025; Ohashi et al., 1996) were used. We cloned and sequenced the amplified DNA fragments and confirmed that they were cytoplasmic actin sequences: five nucleotide differences among the 362 bp sequence were found between the actin genes of cerana and mellifera.

Quantitative RT-PCR assay for period mRNA.

To detect the change in per mRNA level using a single brain of the honeybee, a quantitative RT-PCR analysis was established according to the methods reported previously (Nakayama et al., 1992; Nakamura et al., 1996) with slight modifications. Isolation of mRNA from the brain of foragers and RT-PCR method are performed as described above. After defined cycles of PCR for the analysis of per and cytoskeltal actin mRNA, 5 μl from a 50 μl reaction mixture was electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and amplified bands were detected by ethidium bromide staining. The intensity of the ethidium bromide fluorescence of each band was measured by the CCD imaging system (EDAS120, Kodak Digital Science, Eastman Kodak Company, New York). The PCR cycle-intensity curves are plotted on a semi-logarithmic graphs (Fig. 6). For estimation of the amount (a) of the template and the efficiency (b) of amplification in each PCR, regression line was fitted to the linear portion of the curve: the quantitative determination of target mRNA was performed before PCR products reached a plateau (Nakayama et al., 1992). The amount of per mRNA was normalized with that of actin mRNA (Fig. 7).

RESULTS

Activity rhythms of individual foragers

Walking locomotor rhythms of the foragers were investigated to determine the existence of a circadian system in A. cerana. The locomotor activity of individual forager honeybees was monitored using infrared actographs. Honeybees were entrained under a LD 12:12 photoperiodic regime at constant temperature and a typical record is shown in Fig. 1A. Under LD 12:12, activitiy is concentrated to the later part of the photophase. The onsets of activity were found at the beginning of the photophase and clear offsets occurred at light-off on most days. Foragers could be entrained under LD 16:8 and LD 8:16, and they also showed same tendency of predominant activity in the later part of the photophase (data not shown).

Fig. 1

Representative actogram recordings of an individual foragers under LD 12:12 cycle (A), DD (B), and first kept in LL and then transferred to DD at the time shown by the arrow (D). The one-day data were double plotted. The results of χ2 periodogram analysis of DD (B) data are shown in (C), and the line indicates 95% confidence level (τ =23.1 hr). The white and dark bars represent light and dark condition, respectively.

i0289-0003-18-6-779-f01.tif

Circadian free-running rhythm was observed under DD-condition with free-running period (τ) shorter than 24 hr (Fig.1B and C). Circadian periods were measured first under LL condition and then after transition to DD condition. Some bees showed a free-running rhythm under LL and DD, and typical record is shown in Fig. 1D. The free-running mode, which was recognized clearly by tracing the shifts of offset times, changed discretely with no transitional phase after the LL to DD transition. The free-running periods (τ) were found to be 24.4±0.1 hr (mean±SD, n=8) in LL and 23.1±0.1 hr (n=5) in DD with small deviations, respectively. Moore and Rankin (1985) reported that τ-LL and τ-DD of locomotor activity of A. mellifera was 24.8 hr and 22.0 hr, respectively.

Cloning of per cDNA

To clone a period homolog from A. cerana japonica, we performed PCR with cDNA derived from the bee heads as the template. We made degenerate primers based on the conserved sequences revealed by the alignment of period amino acid sequences of several of insect species (Reppert et al., 1994). Of a total of 18 primers examined, those corresponding to the peptide sequences CVISMHDG (residues 170–177 of the A. pernyi period), LGYLPQD (residues 335-341) and NQLNYN (residues 533–538) were successfully used for PCR amplification of cDNAs, which showed significant homology with period sequences of other insects.

The amplified DNA fragments consisted of two types, α (654 bp in length) and β (630 bp). Type β lacked 24 nucleotides (8 amino acids) from positions 526-549 of type α, whereas all other sequences were identical. A consensus sequence for the 3′ splice site (acceptor site; Norton, 1994) was found (TCCCTTGTTACAG; a pyrimidine-rich region followed by dinucleotide AG) at the 3′ terminal portion of the 24-bp region that was lacking in type β. However, no possible donor site (Norton, 1994) was found at the 5′ terminal part of the stretch. These observations suggested that the two types of the cerana per sequence resulted from alternative splicing of the per mRNA precursor.

Using primers based on the nucleotide sequences common to both types of the cDNAs, we cloned the 5′- and 3′-portions of per cDNA by 5′- and 3′-RACE (Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends) methods, respectively. To determine whether these RACE products were actually parts of a single transcript, PCR was performed using primers corresponding to the sequences of the 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTR) obtained by RACE (see the materials and methods). We amplified two DNA fragments of 3506 bp (GenBank:  AB048825) and 3482 bp ( AB048826), corresponding to types α and β, respectively. The full-length cDNAs of the types α and β contained open reading frames (ORFs) encoding putative proteins of 1124 and 1116 amino acids, respectively. The estimated molecular masses for the types α and β proteins were 124,479 and 123,613, respectively. The amino acid sequences of the two proteins were identical except for a 8 amino acid stretch, corresponding to the 24-bp region described above, present or absent in the type α and β proteins, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Alignment of the C2 region of the period proteins from A. cerana determined in this study, A. melliferaAF159569), P. americanaU12772), D. melanogasterAF033029), M. domesticaAH007818), A. pernyiU12769) and L. cuprinaY19108). A partial sequence ( AB050744) of A. mellifera obtained in this study is also included as A. mellifera*. Identical amino acids are indicated by asterisks. The PAS domains are enclosed by the square brackets. The PAS-A (A) and PAS-B (B) repeats, and the PAC (C; Ponting and Aravind, 1997) domain are boxed in gray. The CLD is underlined. The sites of the perL, per01 and perS mutations in Drosophila and corresponding amino acids of other insects are shown in reverse contrast. The 8-amino acid peptide regions of A. cerana and A. mellifera determined in this study, which are lacking in type β cDNA, are boxed.

i0289-0003-18-6-779-f02.tif

The first methionine of the encoded proteins was followed by another methionine, and the surrounding sequences of the codons for both methionines showed Kozak consensus sequences for the initiation of translation (Kozak, 1987). A protein databases search with the deduced amino acid sequences of types α or β using the BLAST program revealed the highest homology scores with the overall identity of 33.0 or 33.2%, respectively, to period protein from Periplaneta americana. Amino acid sequences of the conserved C2 domains of A. cerana per are aligned with those of other insects in Fig. 2. On the alignment, the A. cerana Per exhibited functionally important domains such as two PAS repeats (A and B in Fig. 2; Huang et al., 1993), CLD (cytoplasmic localization domain; underlined in Fig. 2; Saez and Young, 1996) and short period domain (3 amino acid residues upstream and 16 residues downstream from the perS mutation site; Baylies et al., 1992). Moreover, the A. cerana Per possessed the conserved amino acids to which the perL, perS and per01 mutations were mapped.

Comparison of per sequence of A. cerana with that of A. mellifera

Recently, the full-length cDNA sequence from Apis mellifera, a species closely related to A. cerana, was reported (Toma et al., 2000). We have found that the per sequences were found to be very highly conserved between A. cerana and A. mellifera, at both nucleotide and amino-acid levels (Fig. 2), though the cerana cDNA has additional 18 nucleotides at just upstream of poly(A) sequence of 3′-end compared to mellifera. The reported mellifera sequence corresponds to type α: the 24 bp sequence that was found in the type α of cerana sequence was present at the corresponding position of the mellifera sequence. The identities of nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the coding region were 95.7 and 99.2%, respectively, between the per sequences of A. mellifera and A. cerana (type α).

We examined whether per mRNA of type β is present in A. mellifera PCR was carried out with cDNA derived from heads of mellifera as template using primers (R0 and FS) by which two types (α and β) of fragments were amplified in A. cerana. As a result, we identified partial cDNA sequences of both types α and β also in A. mellifera (Fig. 2). In addition, one amino acid substitution from glycine (G) to glutamic acid (E) was found at position 481 in our mellifera sequence (Fig. 2) compared to that reported by Toma et al. (2000). Amino acid sequences of other insect per have glutamic acid (E) at this position (Fig. 2).

Southern blot analysis

A probe specific to the per cDNA sequence of A. cerana was used for genomic Southern blotting analysis to determine the copy number of the per gene. Digestion of the genomic DNA with EcoRI and HindIII was followed by hybridization with per cDNA-specific probe. Southern blotting analysis of digested genomic DNA revealed a single hybridization band in each lane (Fig. 3). This result indicated that the per gene of A. cerana is present as a single copy, and suggested that types α and β are expressed from the same locus. We found that digestion of genomic DNA of mellifera by HindIII followed by hybridization using the same probe also gave a single band of the same size as cerana (data not shown). This suggested that per genes of cerana and mellifera have a similar structure.

Fig. 3

Southern blotting analysis of the per gene of A. cerana. The cerana genomic DNA digested with EcoRI and HindIII was electro-phoresed and hybridized with A. cerana per specific probe. The sizes of markers are indicated at the left.

i0289-0003-18-6-779-f03.tif

Transcription of per in the brain

To investigate transcription of the per gene, RT-PCR analysis was performed using mRNA isolated from brains of foragers. When we used primers R0 and FI which is designed based on the additional 24-bp stretch of type α (Fig. 4), amplification of ca. 0.7-kb fragment was detected (Fig. 5: lane 2). We cloned and sequenced the amplified DNA fragments and confirmed that they were type α of 681 base in length. Primers RO and FD, based on common sequence in types α and β, similar but slightly larger size of fragments were amplified (lane 3). Cloning and sequencing of the fragments revealed that these consisted of two types of α (753 base) and β (729 base) fragment (Fig. 4). Transcription of the cytoplasmic actin gene was also examined to check the efficiency of mRNA isolation and cDNA synthesis (lane 1). The detected bands were derived from cDNA and not from contaminating genomic DNA because no band was detected when reverse transcription (RT) was omitted. These observations indicated that the both types α and β of per mRNA are expressed in the brain of A. cerana.

Fig. 4

Schematic drawing of selective PCR for the amplification of type α and total (α+β) of per. To amplify the type α and total (α+β), a set of primers R0 and FI, and that of R0 and FD was used, respectively. See the text in detail.

i0289-0003-18-6-779-f04.tif

Fig. 5

RT-PCR of per and actin fragments using mRNA isolated from brains of A. cerana. PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gel. The gel was stained by ethidium bromide. Lane 1 (actin); lane 2 (per, type α: primers RO-FI); lane 3 (total per, types α and β: primers RO-FD). The sizes of markers (lane M) are indicated at the left.

i0289-0003-18-6-779-f05.tif

Daily oscillation of per mRNA level in the brain of foragers

To examine the temporal change of per mRNA level in the brain, we performed a quantitative RT-PCR assay by which expression of type α or total (α+β) transcripts is selectively detected using different pairs of primers (Fig. 4), and the per mRNA level in one single brain can be quantified.

Honeybees were entrained under LD12:12 at colony level and the forager's brains were collected over 24 hr at 3 hr intervals (Fig. 7). Representative data used for the quantification of targeted mRNA by the method are shown in Fig. 6. The results show that the levels of cytoplasmic actin mRNA were almost the same between the samples collected at ZT 9 and ZT 21, whereas the mRNA levels of type α and total (α+β) were high at ZT 21 compared to ZT 9. The efficiencies of amplification in the PCR for type α and total (α+β) were found to be almost same (1.49–1.51); this allowed the comparison between the levels of type α and total (α+β).

Fig. 6

The PCR cycle-product intensity curves used for quantification of mRNA. The curves were plotted on a semi-logarithmic graphs. Representative data of quantitative RT-PCR experiments using mRNA isolated from single brain of the forager captured during photophase at ZT 9:00 (circle symbols) and scotophase at ZT 21:00 (square symbols) were indicated. The mRNA levels of actin (A), per type α (B), and total per (α and β) (C) were measured. Oblique lines show the regression lines determined by the linear portions of the curves, and amounts of the templates were caluculated as described in text.

i0289-0003-18-6-779-f06.tif

Fig. 7 shows the daily changes of per mRNA levels in the brain of the bee kept under LD 12:12 photoperiodic regime. The levels of per (α) and total (α+β) were high during the dark-period compared to the light-period. They increased steeply at the beginning of the dark period, and then decreased gradually. The level of total per transcript was higher than that of type α at any time, and the ratio between the levels of type α and total (α+β) changed by time (Fig. 7 and Table 1). In addition the peak-to-trough ratios in the two graphs are different. These observations suggest that the ratio between the abundance of the two types changed by time in LD cycle.

Fig. 7

Daily oscillation of per mRNA levels examined at 3 hr intervals (square symbols: type α, circle symbols: total per). RNA levels of per and actin were determined by the quantitative RT-PCR assay, and the ratio of amount of per mRNA over that of actin was expressed as the relative arbitrary unit. The horizontal bar at the bottom represents the LD 12:12 lighting cycle: open bar and closed bar indicate the photophase and the scotophase, respectively. Vertical bars represent the SEM (n=5).

i0289-0003-18-6-779-f07.tif

Table 1

Temporal change in the ratio between type α and β transcript

i0289-0003-18-6-779-t01.gif

To confirm the change of the ratio in per transcripts directly, we cloned and sequenced the products (corresponding to the band of lane 3 in Fig. 5) of RT-PCR using primers R0 and FD. The results show that the ratio of type α clones to type β clones was significantly different between the light- and dark-period (Table 1). The ratio of type α clones to total (α+β) clones was low (5–13%) at the light-period (ZT 6 and ZT 9), and it increased to 57–63% at the dark-period (ZT 18 and ZT 21). These observations coincided with the results of RT-PCR assay (Table 1).

DISCUSSIONS

The foragers of A. cerana exhibit circadian locomotor rhythm which is entrained by light-dark cycles with activity largely concentrated to the late photophase (Fig. 1A). This daily rhythm pattern resembles that reported in A. mellifera (Moore and Rankin, 1993). Isolated A. cerana showed a short life-span as described for A. mellifera (Moore and Rankin, 1985), and almost all died within two weeks or so. During the experimental period in this study, however, the honeybees showed overt rhythms with free-running periods that were longer than 24 hr in LL and shorter than 24 hr in DD. The free-running period changed discretely without any transitional phase after LL to DD transition (Fig. 1D). These are the first observations indicating that A. cerana possesses a circadian clock as well as A. mellifera. As a first step to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the biological clock of the honeybees, we cloned the period cDNA from A. cerana.

The cerana per cDNA sequence showed the highest degree of conservation to mellifera per. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the per cDNAs consist of two types (α and β) in A. cerana, and that this is also the case in A. mellifera. The type α and β were different only in a 24-bp nucleotide sequence present only in type α. A consensus motif for the 3′ splice site was found in this 24-bp nucleotide sequence, although no possible 5′ splice site was found, indicating that the two types of cDNA resulted from alternative splicing and not from reverse transcription of a premature transcript. Use of another 3′ splice site, which is predicted to be located immediately upstream of the 24 bp region on the genome, probably results in the production of type α. On the other hand, use of the 3′ splice site found in the 24-bp region should give rise to the type β by skipping the 24-bp region. The type α cDNA encodes a protein with an additional 8-amino acid stretch just upstream of the highly conserved “short period domain”, to which many mutations affecting the period length were mapped (Baylies et al., 1992). This 8-amino acid stretch could not be aligned with the per sequences from any other insect species (Fig. 2).

Colot et al. (1988) identified 6 interspersed blocks of conserved regions C1 to C6 by comparison of the per sequences of three species of Drosophila. The cerana per protein sequence also showed significant conservation in the C1, C2 and C3 blocks (alignment of C2 blocks is shown in Fig. 2). Identity of the amino acid sequences in the C1, C2 and C3 blocks between A. cerana (type β) and Drosophila melanogaster were 38.0, 44.8 and 50.0%, respectively. On the other hand, C4, C5 and C6 blocks are less well conserved in A. cerana. We could not align these C-terminal regions between cerana and any Drosophila species, except for a few short stretches of 10–15 amino acids. This overall pattern of conservation, higher conservation in C1-3 and lower in the C-terminal half is also observed in other nondipteran insects such as A. pernyi (Reppert et al., 1994) and P. americana (data not shown; GenBank:  U12772). In addition, we found no significant conservation in the C-terminal region among the Apis, Antheraea, and Periplaneta sequences. Such variation in the C-terminal region among various insects suggests that this region may not be critical in the central clock mechanism. In contrast to the N-terminal half regions, the functions of the C-terminal half blocks of per protein are not well understood. It is tempting to speculate that the diverged C-terminal sequences of per might be involved in the temporal regulation of behaviors characteristic of each insect group.

In the N-terminal half of the cerana per sequence, we detected motifs and domains thought to be important for the central clock mechanisms with high identity to Drosophila sequences. Especially, the PAS, CLD and short period domains show significant identity with other insect sequences (Fig. 2). The PAS and CLD domains are functionally important in the regulated nuclear entry of Period/Timeless heterodimer (Saez and Young, 1996), which is followed by self-inhibition of per gene expression by Per protein. These are assumed to be critical regulatory steps in the generation of self-sustaining daily oscillations. Thus, the higher degrees of conservation found in these domains indicated that the cerana period is a true structural and likely a functional ortholog of the Drosophila period gene.

The RT-PCR followed by sequencing the DNA fragments, which were amplified using primers of R0 and FD, indicated that both types α and β of per mRNA are expressed in the brains of A. cerana. Moreover, the level of per mRNA in the brain showed robust daily change under a LD cycle as reported in other insects (Hardin et al., 1990; Sauman and Reppert, 1996). Phase relationships of the daily change of per (type α and total) mRNA abundance are similar to that reported in A. mellifera (Toma et al., 2000). These observations, together with the sequence data, supports the idea that the cerana per is a functional ortholog of the clock gene period.

We found that the ratio between the abundance of two types α and β changed by time in LD cycle (Fig. 7 and Table 1). In Drosophila, the per gene generates two types of transcripts by alternative splicing (Cheng et al., 1998). These two types differ only in the presence (type A) or absence (type B′) of an alternative intron in the 3′ untranslated region. Splicing of this intron was enhanced at low temperatures, and a mechanism that allows the preferential daytime activity of flies on cold days was proposed (Majercak et al., 1999). It is interesting to examine whether environmental and ontogenetic factors affect the levels of the two types transcripts in A.cerana. Further investigation of the per in A. cerana is currently underway in our laboratory to reveal the molecular mechanism underlying the circadian rhythm in this species.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid (09NP1501) for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture and partly by CRP support of the British Council to the Symbiotron project of I.S. The authors gratefully thank Prof. M. Sasaki and Dr. H. Sugawara, who kindly provided the colonies of A. cerana. We are also grateful to Prof. M. Ishiura, Dr. H. Iwasaki and Prof. M. Sugita, Dr. K. Sakamoto and Dr. A. Kamikouchi for helpful advice, Prof. T. Kubo for providing us primers for A. mellifera cytoplasmic actin, Dr. I. Ohshima for kindly providing us with the periodogram software program, and Miss. A. Ishida for her technical assistance.

REFERENCES

1.

J. Aschoff 1960. Exogenous and endogenous components of circa-dian rhythms. In. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium Quantitative BiologyVol 25:pp. 11–28. Google Scholar

2.

T. A. Bargiello, F. R. Jackson, and M. W. Young . 1984. Restoration of circadian behavioural rhythms by gene transfer in Drosophila. Nature 312:752–754. Google Scholar

3.

M. K. Baylies, L. B. Vosshall, A. Sehgal, and M. W. Young . 1992. New short period mutations of the Drosophila clock gene per. Neuron 9:575–581. Google Scholar

4.

Y. Cheng, B. Gvakharia, and P. E. Hardin . 1998. Two alternatively spliced transcripts from the Drosophila period gene rescue rhythms having different molecular and behavioral characteristics. Mol Cell Biol 18:6505–6514. Google Scholar

5.

H. V. Colot, J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash . 1988. Related Articles, Protein, Nucleotide Interspecific comparison of the period gene of Drosophila reveals large blocks of non-conserved coding DNA. EMBO J 7:3929–3937. Google Scholar

6.

P. J. Decoursey 1983. Biological timing. In “The Biology of the Crustacea”. Ed by F. J. Vernberg and W. B. Vernberg . Academic Press. New York. pp. 107–162. Google Scholar

7.

J. C. Dunlap 1999. Molecular bases for circadian clocks. Cell 96:271–290. Google Scholar

8.

B. Frisch and J. Aschoff . 1987. Circadian rhythms in honeybees: entrainment by feeding cycles. Physiol Entomol 12:41–49. Google Scholar

9.

B. Frisch and N. Koeniger . 1994. Social synchronization of the activity rhythm of honeybees within a colony. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:91–98. Google Scholar

10.

J. M. Giebultowicz 1999. Insect circadian clocks: is it all in their heads? J Insect Physiol 45:791–800. Google Scholar

11.

P. E. Hardin, J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash . 1990. Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels. Nature 343:536–540. Google Scholar

12.

Z. J. Huang, I. Edery, and M. Rosbash . 1993. PAS is a dimerization domain common to Drosophila period and several transcription factors. Nature 364:259–262. Google Scholar

13.

M. Kaneko, C. Helfrich-Forster, and J. C. Hall . 1997. Spatial and temporal expression of the period and timeless genes in the developing nervous system of Drosophila: newly identified pacemaker candidates and novel features of clock gene product cycling. J Neurosci 17:6745–6760. Google Scholar

14.

M. Kozak 1987. An analysis of 5′-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 15:8125–8148. Google Scholar

15.

J. D. Levine, I. Sauman, M. Imbalzano, S. M. Reppert, and F. R. Jackson . 1995. Period protein from the giant silkmoth Antheraea pernyi functions as a circadian clock element in Drosophila melanogaster. Neuron 15:147–157. Google Scholar

16.

J. Majercak, D. Sidote, P. E. Hardin, and I. Edery . 1999. How a circadian clock adapts to seasonal decreases in temperature and day length. Mol Cell Biol 18:6505–6514. Google Scholar

17.

D. Moore and M. A. Rankin . 1985. Circadian locomotor rhythms in individual honeybees. Physiol Entomol 10:191–197. Google Scholar

18.

D. Moore and M. A. Rankin . 1993. Light and temperature entrainment of a locomotor rhythm in honeybees. Physiol Entomol 18:271–278. Google Scholar

19.

D. Moore, J. E. Angel, L. M. Cheeseman, S. E. Fahrbach, and G. E. Robinson . 1998. Timekeeping in the honey bee colony: integration of circadian rhythms and division of labor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:147–160. Google Scholar

20.

R. F. A. Moritz and P. Kryger . 1994. Self-organization of circadian rhythms in groups of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:211–215. Google Scholar

21.

R. F. A. Moritz and F. Sakofski . 1991. The role of the queen in circadian rhythms of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:361–365. Google Scholar

22.

H. Nakayama, H. Yokoi, and J. Fujita . 1992. Quantification of mRNA by non-radioactive RT-PCR and CCD imaging system. Nucl Acids Res 20:4939–4945. Google Scholar

23.

P. A. Norton 1994. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing: factors involved in splice site selection. J Cell Sci 107:1–7. Google Scholar

24.

K. Ohashi, M. Sawata, H. Takeuchi, S. Natori, and T. Kubo . 1996. Molecular cloning of cDNA and analysis of expression of the gene for aglucosidase from the hypopharyngeal gland of the honeybee Apis mellifera L. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 221:380–385. Google Scholar

25.

A. Piccin, M. Couchman, J. D. Clayton, D. Chalmers, R. Costa, and C. P. Kyriacou . 2000. The clock gene period of the housefly, Musca domestica, rescues behavioral rhythmicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Evidence for intermolecular coevolution? Genetics 154:747–758. Google Scholar

26.

C. S. Pittendrig 1981. Circadian System entrainment. In J. Aschoff Eds. Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology 4:95–181. Google Scholar

27.

C. P. Ponting and L. Aravind . 1997. PAS: a multifunctional domain family comes to light. Curr Biol 7:674–677. Google Scholar

28.

S. M. Reppert, T. Tsai, A. L. Roca, and I. Sauman . 1994. Cloning of a structural and functional homolog of the circadian clock gene period from the giant silkmoth Antheraea pernyi. Neuron 13:1167–1176. Google Scholar

29.

L. Saez and M. W. Young . 1996. Regulation of nuclear entry of the Drosophila clock proteins period and timeless. Neuron 17:911–920. Google Scholar

30.

M. Sasaki 1992. Time-keeping systems in honeybee and ant societies: comparative aspects of social entrainment. In “Circadian clocks from cell to human” Ed by T. Hiroshige and K. Honma . Hokkaido Univ Press Sapporo. pp. 189–199. Google Scholar

31.

M. Sasaki 1999. Wonders of the Japanese honeybee: Biology of north-ernmost Apis cerana. Kaiyusha Publishers Co., Ltd. Tokyo. Google Scholar

32.

I. Sauman, T. Tsai, A. L. Roca, and S. M. Reppert . 1996a. Period protein is necessary for circadian control of egg hatching behavior in the silkmoth Antheraea pernyi. Neuron 17:901–909. Google Scholar

33.

I. Sauman and S. M. Reppert . 1996b. Circadian clock neurons in the silkmoth Antheraea pernyi: novel mechanisms of period protein regulation. Neuron 17:889–900. Google Scholar

34.

D. S. Saunders 1982. Insect Clocks, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press. Oxford. Google Scholar

35.

P. G. Sokolove and W. N. Bushell . 1978. The chi square periodgram: its utility for analysis of circadian rhythm. J Theor Biol 72:131–160. Google Scholar

36.

H. G. Spangler 1973. Role of light in altering the circadian oscillations of the honeybee. Ann Entomol Soc Am 66:449–451. Google Scholar

37.

D. P. Toma, G. Bloch, D. Moore, and G. E. Robinson . 2000. Changes in period mRNA levels in the brain and division of labor in honey bee colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6914–6919. Google Scholar

38.

L. B. Vosshall, J. L. Price, A. Sehgal, L. Saez, and M. W. Young . 1994. Block in nuclear localization of period protein by a second clock mutation, timeless. Science 263:1606–1609. Google Scholar

39.

G. R. Warman, R. D. Newcomb, R. D. Lewis, and C. W. Evans . 2000. Analysis of the circadian clock gene period in the sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Genet Res 75:257–267. Google Scholar

40.

H. Yokoi, S. Natsuyama, M. Iwai, Y. Noda, T. Mori, J. K. Mori, K. Fujita, H. Nakayama, and J. Fujita . 1993. Non-radioiotopic quntitative RTPCR to detect changes in mRNA levels during early mouse embryo development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 195:769–775. Google Scholar

41.

W. A. Zehring, D. A. Wheeler, P. Reddy, R. J. Konopka, C. P. Kyriacou, M. Rosbash, and J. C. Hall . 1984. P-element transformation with period locus DNA restores rhythmicity to mutant, arrhythmic Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 39:369–376. Google Scholar
Isamu Shimizu, Yutaka Kawai, Masanori Taniguchi, and Setsuyuki Aoki "Circadian Rhythm and cDNA Cloning of the Clock Gene period in the Honeybee Apis cerana japonica," Zoological Science 18(6), 779-789, (1 August 2001). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.18.779
Received: 16 November 2000; Accepted: 1 May 2001; Published: 1 August 2001
Back to Top