Dispersal ability and degree of inbreeding in a population can indirectly be assessed using genetic markers. In general, it was suggested that winged termites are not able to fly distances greater than several hundred meters. Here, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was used to analyze genetic diversity, population substructure, and gene flow among insular populations of the termite Nasutitermes takasagoensis (Isoptera: Termitidae) in the Yaeyama Islands, Okinawa, Japan. Samples were collected from 77 nests on seven islands of the Yaeyama Group. Using three primer combinations a total of 155 bands were generated with 78 (50%) polymorphic bands. Genetic distance and Gst values among insular populations were calculated. Relatively high genetic diversity and low values of Gst, suggest there is moderate subpopulation structure. Based on these results, we discussed two possibilities; first, winged termites are able to fly over distances of several kilometers, and second, these results were obtained because insular populations share a recent common origin.
Termites are eusocial insects whose colonies are founded by winged adults, formed by budding (isolation of parts of a colony) or by sociotomy (migration of complete units of a mature colony) (Nutting, 1969). In general, it was suggested that termite winged adults (alates) have a poor dispersal ability. Nutting (1969) reported that distances of termite flight can vary several meters to some hundreds, depending on the species and on the climatic conditions. Bodot (1967) showed that alates of Allodontotermes giffardi flew several meters and established a new colony in the proximity of their mother nest. Abe (1984) and Gathorne-Hardy et al. (2000) in their studies of recolonization of the Krakatau Islands suggested that winged termites were unlikely to be able to cross distances of around 2 km. Ikehara (1966) in his study on insular populations of termites in southwestern Japan, showed that the longest distance recorded for alate flights of Coptotermes formosanus and Odontotermes formosanus was 1 km.
Because this suggested low dispersal ability, it has been proposed that in termite populations inbreeding is the general rule since low dispersal favors mating among relatives (Bartz, 1979; Pamilo, 1984; Williams and Williams, 1957). Dispersal ability and degree of inbreeding in a population can indirectly be assessed using genetic markers. Until now, genetic population structure, genetic diversity and gene flow in termites have been poorly studied (Reilly, 1987; Thompson and Hebert, 1998).
In this study we used the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technique (Vos et al.,1995) to analyze the population genetic structure, genetic diversity and gene flow of Nasutitermes takasagoensis on the Yaeyama Islands, Southern Japan (Fig. 1). AFLP was chosen over other techniques because it has been demonstrated to be a powerful method for the characterization of infraspecific polymorphism among populations, and because of its high reproducibility (Krauss, 1999; Qamaruz-Zaman et al., 1998; Semblat et al., 1998; Winfield et al., 1998; Yan et al., 1999).
N. takasagoensis distributes in the Yaeyama Islands, Taiwan and southeastern mainland China, living in arboreal carton nests with two to several reproductives in a colony (Miura and Matsumoto, 1996). Islands of the Yaeyama group are small and separated from each other by 200 meters to several kilometers; they might have been isolated from China mainland since the late Late Pleistocene (ca. 30,000–10,000 years BP) (Otsuka and Takahashi, 2000). The isolation of N. takasagoensis on the Yaeyama Islands offers a good opportunity to apply molecular techniques to analyze genetic diversity, population structure and gene flow in a natural population of termites. If the dispersal ability of N. takasagoensis was low, little genetic variation within islands, high population substructure, and high genetic distance between insular populations would be expected.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples of N. takasagoensis were collected from 77 nests on seven islands of the Yaeyama Islands, Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan (Iriomote, Ishigaki, Kohama, Taketomi, Kuro, Uchibanari and Hater-uma) (Fig. 1) during three surveys in May, 1995, April, 2000 and July, 2001. Termites were preserved in 100 percent acetone.
To have a more representative sampling, in almost all islands samples were collected from points as far as possible from each other, except for some samples collected in Iriomote (Fig. 1).
Genetic distance among samples was calculated at two spatial scales, one within Iriomote (local scale) and the other between pairs of islands (inter-island scale). In the local scale, geographic distance was measured among 21 nests collected in a relatively small area on Iriomote Island (Fig. 1). In the inter-island scale, geographic distances were measured between the two nearest coastal points among all islands. Distances at the local scale varied from 1 to 855 m whereas inter-island scale distances ranged from 0.2 to 46 km.
To maximize the sampling efficiency, we extracted DNA from only one individual per nest, since termites from the same colony are expected to be genetically close. To confirm this assumption, J. García et al. ten or nine individuals from the same colony in three different nests were genetically compared.
Total genomic DNA was obtained from the head and thorax by standard chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation (Miura et al., 1998). DNA was digested by two restriction endonucleases EcoRI and MseI (New England Biolabs). The AFLP Amplification Core Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used as recommended by the manufacturer. Using two fluorescent-labeled EcoRI primers and three non-labeled MseI primers (Applied Biosystems), we produced a total of three primer combinations (Table 1).
Primer combinations (showing the three selective nucleotides only) used to produce AFLPs in the final selective amplification, and the number of loci and percentage of polymorphisms produced from each.
Samples were run on a 6 percent polyacrylamide gel at 1,800 V and 35 W for 1:30 hr. After electrophoresis, gels were scanned using a Hitachi's FMBIO II Fluorescence Imaging System. Findings were scored in the form of the presence or absence of each fragment within each individual and then pooled over all fragments and primer combinations.
By this method we genotyped a total of 77 samples from seven island populations (37 from Iriomote, 12 from Ishigaki, 6 from Kohama, 6 from Taketomi, 4 from Kuro, 2 from Uchibanari, and 10 from Hateruma), plus 29 individuals from three different nests for analysis of genetic distance within and between nests.
Two types of polymorphisms are detected with AFLPs: (a) substitutions in the restriction sites or in primer elongation binding sites which result in the loss of the band, and (b) insertions/deletions within the restriction fragment which results in different sized bands (Qamaruz-Zaman, 1998). Since AFLP loci segregate as dominant markers, we made the following assumptions to estimate population heterozygosity (Yan et al., 1999).
First, AFLP fragments segregate according to Mendelian expectations. Second, amplified fragments of the same size (dominant alleles) are identical in state among and between populations. Third, unamplified fragments (recessive alleles) of a locus are identical in state among and between populations. Finally it is also assumed that genotypes at all AFLP loci are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Using the program TFPGA (Miller, 1997), genetic diversity within populations was estimated on the basis of Nei's (1978) average heterozygosities, and percentages of polymorphic loci. In addition Nei's (1973) gene diversity was calculated using the program POPGENE Version 1.31 (Yeh et al., 1997). The same program was used to calculate Nei's (1973) Gst (which is equivalent to Wright's Fst,) for pairs of insular populations. Nei's (1978) genetic distance was calculated for an estimate of genetic distance between insular populations and between the 21 samples at local scale. To estimate migration between islands, gene flow, Nm (Slatkin and Barton, 1989) was estimated from Gst.
To clarify if there is a significant correlation between geographic and genetic distances, Mantel tests were conducted at both local and inter-island scales.
To compare genetic distances between and within nests, genetic distance was calculated as total pairwise differences between several individuals from three nests (ten individuals from each of two nests and nine individuals from the remaining one) and compared, by a one-tailed Mann-Whitney test, to pairwise differences between single individuals from ten different nests collected in the same locality. Pairwise comparisons were done by using the program PAUP*4.0b8 (Swofford, 2000).
A total of 155 AFLP fragments were obtained for the three primer combinations used, with 78 (50%) polymorphic bands (Table 1).
The smallest Nei's (1978) genetic distance value was obtained between the populations from Iriomote and Ishigaki (0.0162), followed by Iriomote-Taketomi with 0.0186. The largest distance was obtained between Uchibanari and Hateruma (0.0928) (Table 2).
Gene flow ranged from 0.51 (between Uchibanari and Hateruma) to 8.22 (Iriomote and Ishigaki) (Table 2).
At the local scale the Mantel test did not show a clear relation (r2=0.04; P=0.323; Fig 2). Nevertheless, at the inter-island scale, a stronger relation was found between geographic and genetic distances (r2=0.6; P=0.011; Fig. 3).
The one-tailed Mann-Whitney test showed that pairwise differences were higher between nests than within them (P <0.0001 for the three cases), corroborating the assumption that individuals in the same colony are genetically closer to each other than to individuals in a different colony.
It has been suggested that values of Fst in the range 0.05 to 0.15 indicate moderate genetic differentiation, values in the range 0.15 to 0.25 indicate great genetic differentiation and values above 0.25 indicate very great genetic differentiation (Hartl and Clark, 1989). Applying this rule of thumb to our results, it can be said that the Gst (which is equivalent to Fst) values obtained between the two large islands, Iriomote and Ishigaki, (Gst = 0.057; genetic distance = 0.0162) show that genetic differentiation is moderate. This moderate genetic differentiation between these two islands could indicate that both populations are not completely isolated.
Migration of termites between islands can occur in several ways. Ikehara (1966), Abe (1984) and Gathorne-Hardy et al. (2000) have suggested that rafting of pieces of wood containing reproductives could be an effective means of dispersal for some termite species. Strong typhoons hit Yaeyama islands several times a year; which could facilitate transportation of infested pieces of wood to the sea via the inland temporal and permanent rivers, and carry them to the nearby islands. Nevertheless, Ikehara (1966), using filter papers damped with seawater, demonstrated that the tolerance of N. takasagoensis against sea water is quite low. Therefore, it is unlikely that N. takasagoensis could succeed in rafting from one island to another.
Blowing out of alates by typhoon strong winds could be considered as another possible mode overseas dispersals. Nevertheless, it is also unlikely, since emergence of alates from their mother nests occurs during May, and the typhoon season in the area is from July to November.
Anthropogenic dispersal is considered to be another possible means of putative dispersion for N. takasagoensis. However, this species infests only decayed wood, and it has not been recorded that it lives in human-manufactured wood items (Ikehara, 1966). Thus, this dispersal mode does not seem to be responsible to the putative overseas dispersals.
It is expected that in order to achieve this moderate genetic differentiation between both Iriomote and Ishigaki, frequent migration among populations is necessary. Such frequency might not be easily acquired by rafting, which must be a very stochastic process, or by anthropogenic dispersal, which is improbable; but, by a more reliable means like alate flight. Without ruling out rafting and anthropogenic dispersal, it is suggested that the most frequent kind of migration must be by flight of alates. The relatively low Gst and genetic distance values between Ishigaki-Taketomi (Gst =0.119; genetic distance=0.0308) and Iriomote-Taketomi (Gst=0.085; genetic distance=0.0186), could indicate that gene flow occurs between these small islands and the larger ones.
Nevertheless, values of Gst of some island combinations indicate higher genetic differentiation. For example, Ishigaki-Uchibanari (Gst=0.204; genetic distance=0.0442), Ishigaki-Hateruma (Gst=0.237; genetic distance=0.0729), Uchibanari-Hateruma (Gst=0.494; genetic distance=0.0. 0928). Islands of these combinations are separated from each other by longer distances, suggesting isolation by distance. Nevertheless, in the comparisons between Uchibanari and the other islands, genetic distance is in general high. This could probably be the result of the small sample size of Uchibanari (just two samples) since small sample sizes yield high values of Nei's (1978) genetic distance (Nei, 1978).
Another possible explanation for the low genetic differentiation among some of the insular populations is based on the fact that the islands included in this study conformed from 30,000 to 10,000 years ago a sole island, which after the last glacial era and rising of sea level divided into the actual small islands (Otsuka and Takahashi, 2000); thus, it could be suggested that this island splitting could have produced populations which have not had adequate time to derive genetically. Also, since there are some relatively shallow waters around these islands, some dry connections should have remained between some of them, after the separation of the whole Yaeyama Group from the continent. Consequently, the genetic similarity observed at present could be the result of their recently shared common origin, and not a result of actual high migration rates.
However, the association found by the Mantel test between genetic distance and geographic distance at the inter-island scale suggests that geographically close island populations are genetically closer to each other than to more distant island populations. For this reason, it could be suggested that the most plausible explanation for the moderate genetic differentiation among insular populations is dispersal of termites, although, further studies are needed to validate this hypothesis.
Genetic distance values at local scale are higher than the values at inter-island scale (Figs. 2 and 3). This is the result of the small sample size used in the local scale since as demonstrated by Nei (1978) small sample sizes yield high values of Nei's (1978) genetic distance. Due to this difference in sample size comparisons between both scales cannot be done. The almost no association found by the Mantel test between geographic and genetic distances at the local scale, suggests that winged termites are able to disperse over the distances considered in the local scale of at least 800 m.
We thank H. Katoh, S. Sameshima, S. Koshikawa, Dr. M. Machida and Dr. K. Araya for their help during field and laboratory work. Also we thank to two anonymous reviewers and the editor this journal for their time and valuable comments. This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid Scientific Research Program (no. 11691174 and 13440228) from the Ministry of Education Science and Culture of Japan. We thank Dr. T. Takaso and the staff members of Iriomote Institute, Tropical Biosphere Research Centre, University of Ryukus for their help.
- T. Abe 1984. Colonization of the Krakatau Islands by termites (Insecta: Isoptera). Physiol Ecol Jpn 21:63–88. Google Scholar
- S. H. Bartz 1979. Evolution of eusociality of termites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5764–5768. Google Scholar
- P. Bodot 1967. Observations sur l'essaimage et les premières étapes du développment de la colonie d'Allodontotermes giffardi Silv. (Isoptera, Termitidae). Insect Soc 14:351–358. Google Scholar
- F. J. Gathorne-Hardy, D. T. Jones, and N. A. Mawdsley . 2000. The recolonization of the Krakatau Islands by termites (Isoptera), and their biogeographical origins. Biol J Linn Soc 71:251–267. Google Scholar
- D. L. Hartl and A. G. Clark . 1989. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Google Scholar
- S. Ikehara 1966. Distribution of termites in the Ryukyu Archipelago. Bull Arts and Sci Div Ryukyu Univ (Mat and Nat Sci) 9:49–178. Google Scholar
- S. L. Krauss 1999. Complete exclusion of nonsires in an analysis of paternity in a natural plant population using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Mol Ecol 8:217–226. Google Scholar
- M. P. Miller 1997. Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA) 1.3: A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by the author. Google Scholar
- T. Miura and T. Matsumoto . 1996. Ergatoid reproductives in Nasutitermes takasagoensis (Isoptera: Termitidae). Sociobiology 27:223–238. Google Scholar
- T. Miura, K. Maekawa, O. Kitade, T. Abe, and T. Matsumoto . 1998. Phylo-genetic relationships among subfamilies in higher termites (Isoptera: Termitidae) based on mitochondrial COII gene sequences. Ann Entomol Soc Am 91:515–523. Google Scholar
- M. Nei 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323. Google Scholar
- M. Nei 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590. Google Scholar
- W. L. Nutting 1969. Flight and colony foundation. In “Biology of Termites”. Ed by K. Kirishna and F. M. Weesner . Academic Press. USA. pp. 233–282. Google Scholar
- H. Otsuka and A. Takahashi . 2000. Pleistocene vertebrate faunas in the Ryukyu Islands: their migration and extinction. Tropics 10:25–40. Google Scholar
- P. Pamilo 1984. Genetic relatedness and evolution of insect sociality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:241–248. Google Scholar
- F. Qamaruz-Zaman, M. F. Fay, J. S. Parker, and M. W. Chase . 1998. Molecular techniques employed in the assessment of genetic diversity: a review focusing on orchid conservation. Lindleyana 13:259–283. Google Scholar
- L. M. Reilly 1987. Measurements of inbreeding and average relatedness in a termite population. Amer Natur 130:339–349. Google Scholar
- J. P. Semblat, E. Wajnberg, A. Dalmasso, P. Abad, and P. Castagnone-Sereno . 1998. High-resolution DNA fingerprinting of parthenogenic root-knot nematodes using AFLP analysis. Mol Ecol 7:119–125. Google Scholar
- M. Slatkin and N. Barton . 1989. A comparison of the three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43:1349–1368. Google Scholar
- D. L. Swofford 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts. Google Scholar
- G. J. Thompson and P. D. N. Hebert . 1998. Population genetic structure of the Neotropical termite Nasutiteremes nigriceps (Isoptera: Termitidae). Heredity 80:48–55. Google Scholar
- P. Vos, R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau . 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414. Google Scholar
- G. C. Williams and D. C. Williams . 1955. Natural selection of individually harmful social adaptations among sibs with special reference to social insects. Evolution 11:32–39. Google Scholar
- M. O. Winfield, G. M. Arnold, F. Cooper, M. Le Ray, J. White, A. Karp, and K. J. Edwards . 1998. A study of genetic diversity in Populus nigra subsp. betulifolia in the Upper Severn area of the UK using AFLP markers. Mol Ecol 7:3–10. Google Scholar
- G. Yan, J. Romero-Severson, M. Walton, D. D. Chadee, and D. W. Severson . 1999. Population genetics of the yellow fever mosquito in Trinidad: comparisons of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. Mol Ecol 8:951–963. Google Scholar
- F. C. Yeh, R. Yang, and T. Boyle . 1997. Popgene Version 1.31, Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Computer software distributed by the authors. Google Scholar