Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2004 Analysis of Salmon Calcitonin I in the Ultimobranchial Gland and Gill Filaments during Development of Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, by in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemical Staining
Yoshie Hidaka, Shigeyasu Tanaka, Masakazu Suzuki
Author Affiliations +

We have cloned two distinct cDNAs encoding salmon-type calcitonin (sCT)-I cDNAs from the ultimobranchial gland of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Both cDNAs were predicted to encode nearly identical sCT-I precursors which consisted of an N-terminal peptide of 80 amino acid residues, a putative cleavage site Lys-Arg, sCT-I, a cleavage and amidation sequence Gly-Lys-Lys-Arg, and a C-terminal peptide of 18 amino acids. Development of sCT-I-expressing cells was then examined by employing conventional histochemical staining, in situ hybridization with a specific cRNA probe, and further immunohistochemistry. The primordium of the ultimobranchial gland was first identified, as two cell masses, in the region between the alimentary canal and sinus venosus behind the heart 17 days postfertilization (dpf; 14°C). However, expression of sCT-I mRNA could not be detected in this gland until one day later, and appeared at 18 dpf. sCT-I immunoreactivity was first observed at 19 dpf (two days before hatching), and the ultimobranchial gland began to assume a follicular structure at 20 dpf (one days before hatching). As ontogeny proceeded, the sCT-I-immunoreactive cells increased in both number and stainability. The sCTI mRNA was also expressed on the developing gill filaments, but immunoreactive sCT-I was not detected in these sites. These results provide basic data for further research on the organogenesis of the trout ultimobranchial gland.


Calcitonin (CT) is a vertebrate peptide hormone first identified as a hypocalcemic substance in mammals (Copp et al., 1962). Mammalian CT, abundantly produced from the thyroidal C-cells, is now considered to have a primary role in skeletal conservation (Zaidi et al., 2002). However, recent studies have suggested that CT is synthesized in a variety of extrathyroidal tissues (Beker et al., 1979; Sexton et al., 1999), exerting additional functions as a local factor: e.g. regulation of the sperm mobility and capacitation (Gnessi et al., 1984; Fraser et al., 2001), and of the embryonic implantation and development (Ding et al., 1994; Wang et al., 1998). As for fish, accumulating evidence also indicates that CT may be synthesized in various tissues including the ultimobranchial gland, the major production site of fish CT (Martial et al., 1994; Sasayama 1999; Clark et al., 2002). Although its physiological significance is controversial, it is suggested that serum fish CT might protect scales from excessive resorption in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) and nibbler fish (Girella punctata) (Suzuki et al., 2000a), and be involved in the reproductive physiology of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Bjornsson et al., 1986). Okuda et al., (1999) further proposed that CT, produced locally in the small intestine, might suppress acute absorption of calcium and nutrition in the goldfish. The mRNA encoding a possible calcitonin receptor is also detected in a number of tissues of flounder (Suzuki et al., 2000b), implying diverse functions of fish CT in the adult. To our knowledge, however, there is no report describing the early development and differentiation of CT-producing cells with a survey of the whole fish body. Identification of CT-producing cells during fish ontogeny is important for the understanding of their physiological roles in development. In the present study, we have cloned the mRNA encoding salmon-type CT-I (sCT-I) from the rainbow trout, and established a whole mount in situ hybridization system for trout embryos and alevins. Temporal and spatial expression of the sCT-I mRNA during the early development was then investigated using this technique. Production of sCT-I peptide was further examined by immunohistochemical staining.


Animals and sampling

Two-year-old and 1.5-year-old rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, of both sexes were collected at Fuji Trout Hatchery, Shizuoka, Japan, in March and May. After being carefully dissected out, ultimobranchial glands were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, or fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/0.01M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) at 4°C. In September, eggs and sperm of rainbow trout were transported from Fuji Trout Hatchery to Shizuoka University, where artificial fertilization was carried out. Embryos and alevins were reared in an aquarium with recirculating fresh water at 14°C. The eyed stage was reached 13 days after fertilization, and the trout started hatching 21 days after fertilization. Nearly every day, from 7 days to 24 days after fertilization, embryos or alevins were collected, and some of them were fixed in Bouin's solution without acetic acid at 4°C overnight for histochemical analysis. Others were fixed in 4% PFA /PBS (pH 7.4) at 4°C overnight for in situ hybridization. Both the embryos and alevins of the chum salmon were reared at 10°C in the Otsuchi Marine Research Center of the Ocean Research Institue, University of Tokyo, and fixed nearly every week, from 13 days to 56 days after fertilization, for histological analysis.

Construction of cDNA library and DNA cloning

Total RNA was extracted from 120 ultimobranchial glands of the trout using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen, Tokyo, Japan), and poly(A)+ RNA was prepared with oligo-dT coated latex beads (Oligotex-dT30 super; Takara, Kyoto, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was prepared with a ZAP Express cDNA synthesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), and then a cDNA library was constructed using a ZAP Express cDNA Giga-pack III Gold cloning kit (Stratagene). The resultant cDNA library contained 7.0 × 106 recombinant rhambda phages, and was amplified to 7.6 × 108 plaque-forming units (pfu) /ml.

Preparation of cDNA probe

Poly (A)+ RNA (0.5 μg) from the ultimobranchial gland was reverse-transcribed in 20 μl buffer containing 80 pmol of oligo-dT19 primer, 1 mM dNTP, 20 units RNase inhibitor (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), and 10 units Rous-associated virus 2 (RAV-2) reverse transcriptase (Takara), as described previously (Suzuki et al., 1992). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was subsequently carried out with the sCT primers (5′-CAAGCGTTGCTCCAACCTCA, 20-mer; and 5′-CGTTTCTTGCCAGGCGTGCC, 20-mer) (Fig. 1a), using a Program Temp Control System, PC-701 (Astec, Fukuoka, Japan). The amplification profile for 30 cycles was dissociation at 94°C for 1.5 min, annealing at 55°C for 1.5 min, and extension at 72°C for 2.5 min. The final cycle included polymerization for 8 min. Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis, and a major band was subcloned into pGEM-3Z vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Sequencing reactions were conducted with a thermo sequenase cycle sequencing kit (USB, Cleveland, OH, USA), and nucleotide sequences were analysed using a Li-Cor automated DNA sequencer model 4200L-2G (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). A DNA probe was synthesized from a cDNA fragment encoding sCT-I, using a digoxigenin (DIG)-high prime kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannhaim, Germany).

Fig. 1

Nucleotide sequences of sCT-Ia and -Ib cDNAs from the rainbow trout (a), and their deduced precursors (b). (a): The coding region for sCT precursors is indicated by gray boxes and a black box that specifies the sCT-encoding sequences. The positions of the sCT primers, utilized for initial DNA cloning, are shown under the sequences. The cRNA probes, used for in situ hybridization histochemistry, were prepared from the internal portion of sCT-Ia cDNA, which is indicated by a bar encompassing the sCT primer regions. Gaps marked by hyphens (–) are inserted to optimize homology. Dots represent the nucleotides identical with those of sCT-Ia cDNA. Nucleotides are numbered from 5′ to 3′, beginning with the first base in the coding region. The AATAAA polyadenylation signals are underlined, and a potential polyadenylation signal is double underlined. (b): The sCT-Ia and – Ib precursors are identical except for two amino acid residues (arrows). Asterisks denote potential signals for proteolytic processing, and full points indicate a sequence for potential N-linked glycosylation.


DNA cloning and sequence analysis

Approximately 18,000 recombinants from the amplified cDNA library were screened by plaque hybridization. Hybridization with the above cDNA probe and post-hybridization washing were performed, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Hybridization signals were detected with 25mM CSPD, a 1, 2-dioxetane chemiluminescent enzyme substrate (Tropix, Bedford, MA, USA), on Hyperfilm-ECL film (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) after incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (Roche). The pBK-CMV phagemid vectors with inserts were excised in vivo from the ZAP express vectors of positive recombinants, using the ExAssist helper phage (Stratagene). The nucleotide sequences of these DNAs were analysed using a Li-Cor automated DNA sequencer.

In situ hybridization histochemistry

Antisense and sense RNA probes of 113 bases (Fig. 1a) were prepared by in vitro transcription from the CT-encoding region of rainbow trout sCT-I cDNA, using a DIG RNA labelling kit (Roche). The procedure of whole-mount in situ hybridization for rainbow trout embryos and alevins was established based on several protocols for mammalian (Wilkinson, 1992) and zebrafish embryos ( Briefly, fixed embryos and alevins were digested with 10 μg/ml proteinase K for 10 min (15 dpf and 18 dpf embryos) or 20 min (21 dpf and 24 dpf alevins), refixed in 0.2% glutaraldehyde/4% PFA for 20 min, and then incubated at 65°C overnight with the hybridization buffer containing 1 μg/ml DIG-labelled cRNA. The composition of the buffer was 50% formamide, 5x SSC, 50 μg/ml yeast tRNA, 40 μg/ml heparin, and 1% SDS. After hybridization, the specimens were washed twice in 50% formamide/5x SSC/1% SDS at 65°C for 30 min each time, then treated twice with 20 μg/ml RNase A at 37°C for 30 min each time, and further washed twice in 50% formamide/2×SSC at 65°C for 30 min each time. For signal detection, they were incubated with anti-DIG antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase (Roche) at a 1:2,000 dilution at 4°C overnight. The antibody had been preadsorbed with homogenization powders from rainbow trout alevins. The specimens were then stained with NBT (nitroblue tetrazolium chloride)/BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate) (Roche). Digital images were recorded with a Leica MZ95 stereomicroscope (Leica, Vienna, Austria) equipped with a Polaroid PDMC/OL CCD camera system (Polaroid, Cambridge, MT, USA). Some specimens were embedded in paraplast wax, and 6 μm sections were cut for observation at the cellular level. As for the hybridized gills, 20 μm sections were prepared using Technovit 7100 resin (Kulzer and Co., GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany). In situ hybridization for tissue sections was carried out, as previously described (Suzuki et al. 1997).

Western blot analysis

Homogenate proteins were prepared from the ultimobranchial gland, as described previously (Suzuki et al., 1999). The proteins and sCT peptide (Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland) were denatured at 100°C for 3 min in a modified buffer (Takata et al., 1990), and electrophoresed on a 16.5% T/3% C SDS-polyacrylamide gel in Tris/tricine buffer, according to the methods by Schagger and von Jagow (1987). Electroblotting and signal detection was carried out as described previously (Suzuki et al., 1997). Blotted polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Immobilon, Millipore, Tokyo Japan) were incubated with rabbit anti-sCT-I antibody, a gift from Prof. K. Wakabayashi, Gunma University, Japan, at a 1:5,000 dilution.


The peroxidase-antiperoxidase method was applied for the detection of CT. Serial sections (6 μm) were pretreated with 0.3% H2O2 for 30 min, and washed in deionized water and PBS. They were then incubated overnight with the anti-sCT-I antibody at a 1:8,000 dilution. After washing in PBS, the sections were incubated with the bridge antiserum of goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Dako, Kyoto, Japan) at a 1:200 dilution for 2 h. Peroxidase-conjugated swine anti-rabbit IgG (Dako) was then applied, as the third antibody, at a 1:200 dilution for 1.5 h, and visualized with diaminobenzidine solution (15 mg/100 ml 0.05 M Tris/HCl buffer, pH7.6) including H2O2 (16.7 μl/100 ml). Immunohistochemical controls, in which the primary antibody was omitted, did not show positive staining, confirming the specificity. Other sets of serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Digital images were recorded with an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with a Polaroid PDMC Ie CCD camera system (Polaroid).


Molecular cloning of sCT cDNA

There was a distinct cDNA band of approximately 100 bp observed after gel electrophoresis of RT-PCR products, which had been amplified from the ultimobranchial gland mRNA using the sCT primers. After isolation and subcloning of the cDNA fragment, the nucleotide sequences coding for sCT-I were determined by sequence analysis. The sCT-I-encoding fragment was then used as a probe to screen 18,000 recombinants from the rainbow trout cDNA library. About 1,080 positive CT clones were detected, and sequence analysis revealed the complete nucleotide sequences of two forms of sCT-I (sCT-Ia and -Ib) cDNAs (Fig. 1). In total, 22 positive clones were sequenced, and sCT-Ia and -Ib cDNAs were found in four clones and three clones, respectively.

Rainbow trout sCT cDNA and precursor

The rainbow trout sCT-Ia (Accession number:  AB094135) and -Ib cDNAs (Accession number:  AB094136) consisted of 944 and 648 bases, respectively, excluding the poly(A) tail (Fig. 1a). Both the cDNAs were predicted to encode an N-terminal peptide of 80 amino acid residues, a putative cleavage site Lys-Arg, sCT-I, a cleavage and amidation sequence Gly-Lys-Lys-Arg, and a C-terminal peptide of 18 amino acids, and the precursors shared a 99% amino acid identity (Fig. 1b). The N-terminal peptide may be cleaved into a signal peptide of 25 amino acids and an N-terminal procalcitonin, by analogy with other teleost N-terminal peptides (Suzuki et al., 1998) and human preprocalcitonin (Russwurm et al., 1999). The rainbow trout sCT-I conserved a sequence for potential N-linked glycosylation (Asn88-Leu89-Ser90), although the biological significance of CT glycosylation has yet to be determined (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Embryonic ultimobranchial gland in the parasagittal sections of rainbow trout embryos at 17 dpf (a, b) and 20 dpf (c), and of the alevin at 24 dpf (d), stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The ultimobranchial gland (arrows) is seen just caudal to the pharynx (Ph), characterized by the branchial arches and pouches, (a) and is positioned between the alimentary canal (Ac) and sinus venosus (Sv) (b, c, d). Folliculogenesis (arrow heads) has begun in this gland at 20 dpf (c). Presumptive ultimobranchial glands could not be localized at earlier stages. Br, brain; He, heart. Anterior is left. The scale bar = 50 μm.


Histological analysis of the ultimobranchial gland

Development of the ultimobranchial gland was first examined by traditional histochemical methods with hematoxylin and eosin. Distinct early rudiments of the ultimobranchial gland were observed 17 days postfertilization (dpf), as two disk-like cell masses posterior to the pharynx (Fig. 2a, b). They were located bilaterally close to the sagittal plane, facing the sinus venosus just beneath the alimentary canal. Both the location and overall structure of the ultimobranchial gland appeared to be relatively unchanged from 17 dpf to 24 dpf (3 days posthatch) (Fig. 2), but follicle-like structures became visible from 20 dpf (one day before hatching) (Fig. 2c, d).

The sCT-I gene expression was then investigated by whole mount in situ hybridization histochemistry with a DIG-labelled antisense RNA probe (Fig. 1a). Specificity of the probe was confirmed by detecting a strong signal throughout the ultimobranchial gland of the adult trout (Fig. 3a). This probe is considered to detect both sCT-Ia and –Ib mRNAs because the DNA region, from which the RNA probe was synthesized, has a 98% nucleotide identity between the sCT-Ia and -Ib cDNAs. The whole mount in situ hybridization detected a pair of weak signals under the alimentary canal, just caudal to the gills, in 18 dpf embryos (Fig. 4a). Paraffin sectioning of the 18 dpf whole mounts revealed that the hybridization signals for sCT-I mRNA were scattered within the ultimobranchial gland and distributed only in some population of the cells (Fig. 4a, inset). Three in five embryos at 18 dpf showed sCT-I-positive signals in this organ, suggesting a developmental variation in the onset of sCT-I gene expression in the ultimobranchial gland. Thereafter, both the number of cells showing the hybridization signal and the signal intensity in this organ increased progressively with age (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 3

In situ hybridization histochemistry for sCT-I mRNA in wax sections (6 μm) of the ultimobranchial gland of adult trout. (a): Cells in the ultimobranchial gland show an intense hybridization signal with the DIG-labelled antisense cRNA probe. (b): Control section to (a). No signal is seen by hybridization with the sense probe. Ts, transverse septum. The scale bar = 50 μm.


Fig. 4

Expression of sCT-I mRNA in the developing ultimobranchial gland (a, b) and gill filaments (c) of rainbow trout, by whole mount in situ hybridization. (a): Ventral view of the hybridized 18 dpf embryo shows the earliest signal in a pair of the ultimobranchial glands (arrows) sited on the alimentary canal (Ac), and a parasagittal section of this embryo (inset) reveals that the signal originates in only some cells of the ultimobranchial gland. (b): The hybridization signal from the ultimobranchial gland (arrows) intensifies in the 24 dpf alevin, and a parasagittal section (inset) shows the signal coming from all the cells of this gland. Gi, gills; Pf, pectoral fin. Anterior is up. (c): The gill, dissected out of the hybridized 24 dpf alevin, shows distinctive signals over the elongating gill filaments (arrows). A parasagittal section (inset) of the distal part of gill filaments shows the signal to occur in all the cells of each gill filament, including the epithelial cells (arrowhead) and central cord cells (arrow). (d): Control gill to (c). The gill from the 24 dpf alevin hybridized with the sense probe exhibits no distinct signal. The scale bar to whole mounts = 100 μm; the bar to insets of (a) and (b) = 10 μm; the bar to the inset of (c) = 50 μm.


To localize sCT-I peptide, a polyclonal antibody was applied for immunohistochemistry. Specificity of the antibody was assessed by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 5 (lane 1), the anti-sCT antibody recognized sCT-I peptide as a prominent band of 3.5 kDa. This band was also detected intensely in the homogenate of trout ultimobranchial gland (Fig. 5, lane 2), indicating that this antibody detects sCT-I, but not its precursor. Immunohistochemical staining of wax sections with this antibody exhibited no labels until 19 dpf (Fig. 6a), at which time sCT-I immunore-activity was observed in some cells of the ultimobranchical gland (Fig. 6b). As ontogeny proceeded, the sCT-I-positive cells increased in both number and stainability (Fig. 6c), which agrees with the expression pattern of the sCT-I mRNA (Fig. 4a, b).

Fig. 5

Western blot analysis with a rabbit anti-sCT-I antibody for sCT-I peptide (2 μg: lane 1) and the proteins prepared from the ultimobranchial gland of adult rainbow trout (10 μg: lane 2). After separated on 16.5% T/3% C SDS-PAGE, a prominent band of 3.5 kDa was immuno-detected in both lanes, confirming the specificity of this antibody and the production of sCT-I peptide in the ultimobranchial gland.


Fig. 6

Production of sCT-I peptide in the developing ultimobranchial gland of rainbow trout, by immunohistochemical staining of wax sections (6 μm). No sCT-I immuno-labelling is seen in the ultimobranchial gland (arrow) of the 18 dpf embryo (a), but immunoreactive sCT-I appears in some cells of this organ (arrow) at 19 dpf (b). The number of immunoreactive cells and the intensity of the immuno-labelling have increased in the ultimobranchial gland (arrow) of the 24 dpf alevin (c). Ac, alimentary canal; Sv, sinus venosus. Anterior is left. The scale bar = 50 μm.


As for tissues other than the ultimobranchial gland, hybridization signals for sCT-I mRNA were observed in the developing gill filaments. As the gill filaments just emerged from the pharyngeal arches, distinctive signals were not detected in these sites. However, the signals became evident by 24 dpf (3 days posthatching), when the gill filaments elongated (Fig. 4c). Sectioning of the hybridized 24 dpf alevins displayed that the signal for sCT-I mRNA was distributed over the epithelial cells of each gill filament and in the distal part of the central cell cord running through the filament. (Fig. 6a, inset). However, no immunoreactive sCT-I was detectable in these cells (data not shown).

Histological analysis of chum salmon embryos and alevins with hematoxylin and eosin stainings also showed that a pair of primitive ultimobranchial glands occurred at 38 dpf (10°C) and developed in a similar manner to the rainbow trout (data not shown). All the results concerning the rainbow trout and chum salmon are summarized in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Diagram showing the differentiation events concerning the sCT-I-producing cells during development of the rainbow trout (a) and chum salmon (b). The immunohistochemical data for chum salmon sCT-I (b) are cited from Sasayama (1989).



In the present study, two distinct cDNAs encoding sCTI were cloned from the ultimobranchial gland of rainbow trout. The cloned sCT-Ia cDNA was 296 bases longer than sCT-Ib cDNA, but shorter transcripts for sCT-Ia precursor might be generated by use of a potential polyadenylation signal at positions 580–585 in the 3′ non-coding region (Fig. 1a), as in the pink salmon that produces two sCT-I mRNA species by alternative polyadenylation (Martial et al., 1994). The initiation site for translation was predicted to be ATG at positions 1 to 3 in each cDNA (Fig. 1) because the sequence ACCATGG at positions -3 to 4 was identical with the consensus sequence for initiation sites in other eukaryotic genes (Kozak, 1981).

The present study surveyed both the expression of sCT-I mRNA and the synthesis of sCT-I peptide over the whole bodies of rainbow trout embryos and alevins, by whole mount in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Hybridization signals for sCT-I mRNA were observed in a pair of the ultimobranchial glands and in the growing gill filaments. In mammals, it is well known that the ultimobranchial body develops from the ventral portion of the last pharyngeal pouches (Moore and Persaud, 1993; Manley and Capecchi, 1995), and it is therefore speculated that fish ultimobranchial gland may be derived in a similar manner (Copp, 1969). However, the present histological analysis could not localize the site from which the anlage of this gland is formed in early trout embryos.

In the trout ultimobranchial gland, sCT-I mRNA was first detected in 18 dpf embryos, and immunoreactive sCT-I was visible from 19 dpf. It is well documented that CT is synthesized and secreted by the ultimobranchial gland or thyroid C-cells after proteolytic processing of a larger precursor molecule (Sexton et al., 1999; Pondel, 2000). Accordingly, the present molecular analysis has clarified the amino acid sequence of rainbow trout CT precursor in which the sCT-I portion is flanked by two putative cleavage sites: Lys-Arg and Gly-Lys-Lys-Arg, like other CT precursors (Clark et al., 2002). In mammals, it is suggested by immunohistochemical staining that either prohormone convertase 2 (PC2) together with PC1 or PC2 alone are involved in the cleavage of procalcitonin in the C-cells (Tomita, 2000; Kurabuchi and Tanaka, 2002). Although neither PC1 nor PC2 have yet been cloned in the salmonids, homologous convertases seem to occur in the trout ultimobranchial gland just before or at 19 dpf, contributing to the production of sCT-I in this site.

The present conventional histochemical staining showed that in chum salmon embryos, the primitive ultimobranchial gland began to be formed at 38 dpf (10°C), and developed in a similar fashion to the rainbow trout. It is reported that immunoreactive sCT-I occurs in the ultimobranchial gland of chum salmon from 45 dpf (three days before hatching) onwards (Sasayama et al., 1989). Although the developmental stages of rainbow trout have not been fully compared with those of chum salmon (Vernier, 1969), ontogeny of the ultimobranchial gland basically seems similar for these two species. It is possible that the developmental characteristics of the ultimobranchial gland, observed in the rainbow trout, might be also seen in all salmonid fish.

In teleosts, active sites of calcium deposition are considered to be the skeletal bone and scales (Sasayama, 1999), and it is reported that sCT stimulates the growth of these tissues in a cichlid fish (Wendelaar Bonga and Lammers, 1982). CT also suppresses osteoclastic activities in the scales of other fishes (Suzuki et al., 2000a). In the rainbow trout, however, neither hard bones nor scales appeared to be formed during the present observation period, suggesting that the commencement of sCT production is not directly involved in the formation of hard tissues. On the other hand, recent reports have indicated that CT may have various roles in embryonic/foetal development (Pondel, 2000). For example, an in vitro study demonstrated that CT can increase avian embryonic cartilage growth primarily by promoting cartilage maturation through accelerating chondrocyte hypertrophy and matrix formation (Burch, 1984). In addition, CT receptor (CTR) mRNAs are expressed in most tissues of adult mammals (Kuestner et al., 1994; Sexton et al., 1999), and an embryological study utilizing transgenic mice with a 4.9-kb human CTR promoter/beta-galactosidase (LacZ) construct exhibits that CTR gene is expressed in various tissues such as the brain, spinal cord, muscle, and skin, during ontogeny (Jagger et al., 2000). Similarly, a possible CTR mRNA is shown to exist in a number of tissues from a teleost (Suzuki et al., 2000b). Although there is no direct evidence, it is possible that sCTR might occur in various tissues during ontogeny of rainbow trout, and that sCT, secreted from the ultimobranchial gland, might subserve a role in these tissues.

The present study showed hybridization signals for sCT-I mRNA in the gill filaments at 24 dpf, but the immunohistochemical staining failed to detect clear labeling for sCTI peptide in these sites. One possible explanation for this discrepancy could be that sCT-I is secreted in very small amounts and/or via a rapid vesicular transport pathway. In murines, ectopic CT production is reported in uterine epithelial cells during the early stages of pregnancy (Ding et al., 1994). Furthermore, blastocyst differentiation can be accelerated through receptor-mediated Ca signaling by CT treatment in vitro, suggesting a local function of the ectopic CT (Wang et al., 1998). As mentioned above, in mice various tissues express CTR mRNA during ontogeny (Jagger et al., 2000), and it is also shown using a HEK293 cell line stably expressing CTR1a isoform that CT can induce activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (Chen et al., 1998), which could mediate multiple cellular functions such as differentiation, transformation, and proliferation (Tanoue and Nishida, 2003). Because the specific binding of CT is detected in trout gills (Ariot-Bonnemaines et al., 1983), sCT-I, produced in the developing gill filaments, might have some autocrine or paracrine actions.

Our failure to detect sCT-I immunoreactivity in the trout gills could be also interpreted as evidence that procalcitonin (proCT) is produced in these sites, because the anti-sCT antibody used in this study does not seem to recognize the pro-sCT-I molecule, judging from the results of the Western blot analysis (Fig. 5). In the last decade, numerous clinical studies have shown that blood concentrations of proCT are increased in systemic inflammation and sepsis (Russwurm et al., 1999; Whicher et al., 2001). Unexpectedly, proCT levels were elevated even in septic, thyroidectomized patients (Assicot et al., 1993), suggesting that the majority of proCT are secreted from cells other than thyroid C-cells. Whereas blood mononuclear cells and the liver are candidate sites of origin of proCT in mammals (Russwurm et al., 2001; Whicher et al., 2001), rainbow trout pro-sCT-I might be secreted from the gills. However, the physiological role of proCT is not yet known in fish.

Our in situ hybridization analysis revealed that the ultimobranchial gland of rainbow trout begins to express sCT-I mRNA at 18 dpf, and its expression levels increased drastically as ontogeny proceeded. Nothing is, however, known about the molecular mechanisms for initiating and intensifying sCT gene expression in this site. Our elucidation of the sCT-I cDNAs has now made it possible to identify the whole sCT-I genes of the trout and determine whether homologous enhancer elements occur in the 5′-flanking DNA of these sCT genes. In mammals, luciferase reporter assay with HeLa and 44-2C cell lines revealed that an 18-bp element (5′-GGCAGCTGTGCAAATCCT), located approximately 1 kbp upstream of the transcriptional initiation site of rat CT gene, has a strong enhancer activity (Tverberg and Russo, 1993). A nearly identical sequence to this element is also present in the human CT/CGRP enhancer region (Braod et al., 1989; Peleg et al., 1990). These distal enhancers contain potential binding elements for helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein and octamer-binding protein designated OB2. It is suggested (Lanigan and Russo, 1997) that the major HLH complex can be a heterodimer of the ubiquitous upstream stimulatory factor-1 and -2. Although OB2 protein has not yet been cloned, mobility shift competition assays indicate the existence of this factor in the CT/CGRP-producing CA77 and 44-2C cells, but not in non-C-cell lines such as HeLa, GH3, and Rat-1, suggesting that OB2 protein is a cell-specific activator. Therefore, OB2-like protein might occur in the ultimobranchial gland of rainbow trout by 18 dpf, enhancing sCT gene expression.


We are grateful to the staff of Fuji Trout Hatchery for the sufficient supply of rainbow trout, and to the staff of the Fuji Branch of Shizuoka Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station for providing a working place. We would like to thank Mses Yoshiko Koyama and Natsumi Ishihara, Shizuoka University, Japan, for their technical assistance. This work was supported by Grants-in Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan, and in part by funds from the cooperative program (No. 115, 2002) provided by Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo.



Y. Ariot-Bonnemains, M. Fouchereau-Peron, M. S. Moukhtar, and G. Milhaud . 1983. Characterization of target organs for calcitonin in lower and higher vertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol A 76:377–380. Google Scholar


M. Assicot, D. Gendrel, H. Carsin, J. Raymond, J. Guilbaud, and C. Bohoun . 1993. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet 341:515–518. Google Scholar


L. K. Becker, H. R. Snider, F. C. Moore, G. K. Monaghan, and L. O. Silva . 1979. Calcitonin in extrathyroidal tissues of man. Acta Endocrinol 92:746–751. Google Scholar


B. T. Bjornsson, C. Haux, L. Forlin, and L. J. Deftos . 1986. The involvement of calcitonin in the reproductive physiology of the rainbow trout. J Endocrinol 108:17–23. Google Scholar


M. P. Broad, J. A. Symes, V. R. Thakker, and K. R. Craig . 1989. Structure and methylation of the human calcitonin/alpha-CGRP gene. Nucleic Acid Res 17:6999–7011. Google Scholar


W. M. Burch 1984. Calcitonin stimulates growth and maturation of embryonic chick pelvic cartilage growth in vitro. Endocrinology 114:1196–1202. Google Scholar


M. Calta 2002. Active chloride cell density in some tissues of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum, 1792) larvae during the early development stage. Folia Biol (Krakow) 50:91–94. Google Scholar


Y. Chen, J-F. Shyu, A. Santhanagopal, D. Inoue, J-P. David, S. J. Dixon, W. C. Horne, and R. Baron . 1998. The calcitonin receptor stimulates Shc tyrosine phosphorylation and Erk1/2 activation. J Biol Chem 273:19809–19816. Google Scholar


S. M. Clark, L. Bendell, M. D. Power, S. Warner, G. Elgar, and M. P. Ingleton . 2002. Calcitonin: characterisation and expression in a teleost fish, Fugu rubripes. J Mol Endocrinol 28:111–123. Google Scholar


D. H. Copp and B. A. Cheney . 1962. Calcitonin: a hormone from the parathyroid that lowers calcium level of the blood. Nature 193:381–382. Google Scholar


D. H. Copp 1969. The ultimobranchial glands and calcium regulation. In “Fish Physiology, vol. II”. Ed by W. S. Hoar and D. J. Randall . Academic Press. New York. pp. 377–398. Google Scholar


Q. Y. Ding, J. L. Zhu, K. M. Bagchi, and C. I. Bagchi . 1994. Progesterone stimulates calcitonin gene expression in the uterus during implantation. Endocrinology 135:2265–2274. Google Scholar


L. R. Fraser, M. D. Pondel, and G. P. Vinson . 2001. Calcitonin, angiotensin II and FPP significantly modulate mouse sperm function. Mol Human Reprod 7:245–253. Google Scholar


L. Gnessi, L. Silvestroni, A. Fabbri, C. Moretti, A. E. Panerai, V. Bonifacio, and F. Fraioli . 1984. Salmon calcitonin inhibits human sperm mobility in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 125:199–204. Google Scholar


S. Hiraoka, M. Suzuki, T. Yanagisawa, M. Iwata, and A. Urano . 1993. Divergence of gene expression in neurohypophysial hormone precursors among salmonids. Gen Comp Endocrinol 92:292–301. Google Scholar


C. Jagger, T. Chambers, and M. Pondel . 2000. Transgenic mice reveal sites of calcitonin receptor gene expression during development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 274:124–129. Google Scholar


H. Jansz, K. Martial, J. Zandberg, G. Milhaud, A. A. Benson, A. Julienne, M. S. Moukhtar, and M. Cressent . 1996. Identification of a new calcitonin gene in the salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:12344–12348. Google Scholar


F. Katoh, A. Shimizu, K. Uchida, and T. Kaneko . 2000. Shift of chloride cell distribution during early life stages in seawater-adapted killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Zool Sci 17:11–18. Google Scholar


M. Kozak 1981. Possible role of flanking nucleotides in recognition of the AUG initiator codon by eukaryotic ribosomes. Nucleic Acid Res 9:5233–5252. Google Scholar


E. R. Kuestner, D. R. Elrod, J. F. Grant, S. F. Hagen, L. J. Kuijper, L. S. Matthewes, J. P. O'Hara, O. P. Sheppard, D. S. Stroop, L. D. Thompson, E. T. Whitmore, M. D. Findlay, S. Houssami, M. P. Sexton, and E. E. Moore . 1994. Cloning and characterization of an abundant subtype of the human calcitonin receptor. Mol Pharmacol 46:246–255. Google Scholar


S. Kurabuchi and S. Tanaka . 2002. Immunocytochemical localization of prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2 in the mouse thyroid gland and respiratory tract. J Histochem Cytochem 50:903–909. Google Scholar


M. T. Lanigan and F. A. Russo . 1997. Binding of upstream stimulatory factor and a cell-specific activator to the calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide enhancer. J Biol Chem 272:18316–18324. Google Scholar


N. R. Manley and M. R. Capecchi . 1995. The role of Hoxa-3 in mouse thymus and thyroid development. Development 121:1989–2003. Google Scholar


K. Martial, L. Maubras, J. Taboulet, A. Jullienne, G. Milhaud, S. M. Moukhtar, and M. Cressent . 1994. Production of salmon calcitonin I in Oncorhynchus gorbuscha by alternative polyadenylation of two RNA species. Gene 149:277–281. Google Scholar


K. L. Moor and T. V. N. Persaud . 1993. The branchial or pharyngeal apparatus. In. “the Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology”. WB Saunders Company. Philadelphia. pp. 186–225. Google Scholar


S. Ohno, U. Wolf, and N. B. Atkin . 1968. Evolution from fish to mammals by gene duplication. Hereditas 59:169–187. Google Scholar


R. Okuda, Y. Sasayama, N. Suzuki, A. Kambegawa, and K. A. Srivastav . 1999. Calcitonin cells in the intestine of goldfish and a comparison of the number of cells among saline-fed, soup-fed or high Ca soup-fed fishes. Gen Comp Endocrinol 113:267–273. Google Scholar


S. Peleg, V. R. Abruzzese, J. G. Cote, and F. R. Gagel . 1990. Transcription of the human calcitonin gene is mediated by a C-cell-specific enhancer containing E-box-like elements. Mol Endocrinol 4:1750–1757. Google Scholar


M. Pondel 2000. Calcitonin and calcitonin receptors: bone and beyond. J Exp Pathol 81:405–422. Google Scholar


S. Russwurm, M. Wiederhold, M. Oberhoffer, I. Stonans, F. P. Zipfel, and K. Reinhart . 1999. Molecular aspects and natural source of procalcitonin. Chin Chem Lab Med 37:789–797. Google Scholar


S. Russwurm, I. Stonans, E. Stonans, M. Wiederhold, A. Luber, P. F. Zipfel, H-P. Deigner, and K. Reinhart . 2001. Procalcitonin and CGRP-I mRNA expression in various human tissues. Shock 16:109–112. Google Scholar


Y. Sasayama 1989. Immunohistochemical study of the ultimobranchial gland in chum salmon fry. Zool Sci 6:607–610. Google Scholar


Y. Sasayama 1999. Hormonal Control of Ca homeostasis in lower vertebrates: considering the evolution. Zool Sci 16:857–869. Google Scholar


H. Schagger and G. von Jagow . 1987. Tricine-sodim dedecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368–379. Google Scholar


M. P. Sexon, M. D. Findlay, and J. T. Martin . 1999. Calcitonin. Curr Med Chem 6:1067–1093. Google Scholar


M. Suzuki, S. Hyodo, M. Kobayashi, K. Aida, and A. Urano . 1992. Characterization and localization of mRNA encoding the salmon-type gonadotrophin-releasing hormone precursor of the masu salmon. J Mol Endocrinol 9:73–82. Google Scholar


M. Suzuki, K. Fujikura, N. Inagaki, S. Seino, and K. Takata . 1999. Immuno-localization of sulfphonylurea receptor 1 in rat pancreas. Diabetologia 42:1204–1211. Google Scholar


M. Suzuki, K. Fujikura, K. Kotake, N. Inagaki, S. Seino, and K. Takata . 1997. Localization of the ATP-sensitive K+ channel subunit Kir6.2 in mouse pancreas. Diabetes 46:1440–1444. Google Scholar


N. Suzuki, T. Nishizawa, Y. Kase, Y. Sasayama, Y. Takei, H. Kaiya, K. Ukawa, T. Noso, A. Kambegawa, and K. Srivastav . 1998. Amino acid sequences of N-terminal procalcitonin of some vertebrates. Netherlands J Zool 48:349–360. Google Scholar


N. Suzuki, T. Suzuki, and T. Kurokawa . 2000a. Suppression of osteoclastic activities by calcitonin in the scales of goldfish (freshwater teleost) and nibbler fish (seawater teleost). Peptides 21:115–124. Google Scholar


N. Suzuki, T. Suzuki, and T. Kurokawa . 2000b. Cloning of a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor and a novel calcitonin receptor-like receptor from the gill of flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Gene 244:81–88. Google Scholar


K. Takata, T. Kasahara, M. Kasahara, O. Ezaki, and H. Hirano . 1990. Erythrocyte/HepG2-type glucose transporter is concentrated in cells of blood tissue barriers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 173:67–73. Google Scholar


T. Tomita 2000. Immunocytochemical localization of prohormone convertase 1/3 and 2 in thyroid C-cells and medullary thyroid carcinomas. Endoc Pathol 11:165–172. Google Scholar


T. Tanoue and E. Nishida . 2003. Molecular recognitions in the MAP kinase cascades. Cell Signal 15:455–462. Google Scholar


A. L. Tverberg and F. A. Russo . 1993. Regulation of the calcitonin/calcitonin-gene-related peptide gene by cell-specific synergy between helix-loop-helix and octamer-binding transcription factors. J Biol Chem 268:15965–15973. Google Scholar


J. M. Vernier 1969. Table chronologique du developpement embryonnaire de la truite arc-en-ciel, Salmo gairdneri Rich. 1836. Ann Embryol Morph 2:495–520. Google Scholar


J. Wang, K. U. Rout, C. I. Bagchi, and R. Armant . 1998. Expression of calcitonin receptors in mouse preimplantation embryos and their function in the regulation of blastocyst differentiation by calcitonin. Development 125:4293–43. Google Scholar


S. E. Wendelaar Bonga and P. I. Lammers . 1982. Effects of calcitonin on ultrastructure and mineral content of bone and scales of the cichlid teleost Sarotherodon mossambicus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 48:60–70. Google Scholar


J. Whicher, J. Bienvenu, and G. Monneret . 2001. Procalcitonin as an acute phase marker. Ann Clin Biochem 38:483–493. Google Scholar


D. G. Wilkinson 1992. Whole mount in situ hybridization of vertebrate embryos. In “In Situ Hybridization, A Practical Approach”. Ed by D. G. Wilkinson IRL Press at Oxford University Press. Oxford. pp. 75–83. Google Scholar


M. Zaidi, B. S. Moonga, and E. Abe . 2002. Calcitonin and bone formation: a knockout full of surprises. J Clin Invest 110:1769–1771. Google Scholar
Yoshie Hidaka, Shigeyasu Tanaka, and Masakazu Suzuki "Analysis of Salmon Calcitonin I in the Ultimobranchial Gland and Gill Filaments during Development of Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, by in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemical Staining," Zoological Science 21(6), 629-637, (1 June 2004).
Received: 10 February 2004; Accepted: 1 April 2004; Published: 1 June 2004

Rainbow Trout
salmon-type calcitonin
ultimobranchial gland
Get copyright permission
Back to Top