Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2004 Polymorphism of Dopamine Receptor D4 Exon I Corresponding Region in Chicken
Author Affiliations +

In stockbreeding, there are indications that behavioral traits of livestock have an effect on breeding and production. If the variation in individual behavior is related to that in neurotransmitter-related genes such as in humans, it would be possible to breed pedigrees composed of individuals having behavioral traits that are useful to production and breeding using selection based on genotypes. In this study, we investigated the exon I region of dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4), in which variation is related to psychiatric disorder in humans, in major poultry species namely Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), chicken (Gallus gallus), ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) and helmeted guinea fowl (Numida melea-gris). Furthermore, we investigated Japanese cormorant (Phalacrocorax capillatus) and Japanese jungle crow (Corvus macrorhynchos) as an out-group. In these species of birds, the repeat of proline was identified in the region corresponding to the human polymorphic region. The repeat number was 9 in Japanese quail, ring-necked pheasant and Japanese cormorant; 12 in helmeted guinea fowl; and 3 in Japanese jungle crow. However, no polymorphism was found in these species. In contrast, polymorphism was observed in chicken and two alleles with 8 and 9 repeats were identified. Although 9 repeats (allele 9) were predominant in most chicken breeds, Black Minorca had only 8 repeats (allele 8). Intra-breed polymorphism was found in 6 out of 12 breeds, and two alleles (alleles 8 and 9) were detected in these breeds. This polymorphism, which is the first to be reported on a neurotransmitter-related gene in birds, would contribute significant information for elucidation of differences in behavioral traits in chicken breeds.


In stockbreeding, there are indications that behavioral traits of livestock have an effect on breeding and production. It may be possible to reduce the burden imposed on farming by selection of tame individuals in livestock and poultry.

There are many reports about the relation of behavioral traits to production in bovine and swine, which are known as major livestock. In bovine, Simmental was more difficult to handle than German Angus (Gauly et al., 2001). In swine, it was reported that there were positive relations between backtest scores and lean meat percentage that reflect a possibly heritable behavioral trait, which might be influenced by the environment and by the previous experiences (van Erp-van der Kooij et al., 2000). Additionally, pigs that walked less in the open field pen seemed to have grown faster for a certain period than did pigs with high open field scores (Beilharz et al., 1967).

In poultry, fearfulness and growth have been reported to be negatively associated in Japanese quail (Jones et al., 1997), and feather pecking is a major welfare problem in egg production of chicken (Savory, 1995). Besides, feather loss has an economic impact on egg production because it increases the bird's food requirement (Emmans and Charles, 1976; Tauson and Svensson, 1980; Tullett et al., 1980) and feather pecking birds with feather damage are more fearful than non-feather pecking birds (Vestergaard et al., 1993).

In a study using full-sibling families in cattle, it has been suggested that there is inheritance of variability in the vocal responses of cattle, which is independent of previous experience and learning (Watts et al., 2001). Thus, it is possible to breed pedigrees composed of individuals having behavioral traits that are useful to production and breeding through artificial selection.

In humans, several candidate genes coding proteins concerning regulation of neurotransmitter such as dopamine or serotonin in the brain have been reported to have association between their polymorphisms and particular personality (Benjamin et al., 1996; Lesch et al., 1996; Sabol et al., 1999). In human dopamine receptor, 5 subtypes are known and are classified into 2 major groups, D1 like receptors (D1 and D5) and D2 like receptors (D2, D3 and D4) by their ability to promote/inhibit adenylate cyclase activity (Seeman and Van Tol, 1994). Among them, dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4), one of the 5 dopamine receptors known in humans, has received considerable attention because it is distributed mainly in the limbic system and is expressed in neural cells having an effect upon cognitive and emotional behaviors (Van Tol et al., 1991) and a possible target of antipsychotic drug (Seeman and Van Tol, 1994). DRD4 is polymorphic at several positions of the gene and some of them are related to expression (Okuyama et al., 1999), ligand binding (Van Tol et al., 1992), personality (Ebstein et al., 1996) and several psychiatric diseases. For example, the relation has been reported between the number of 12 bp repeats in the exon I region of DRD4 and delusional disorder (Catalano et al., 1993). We have subsequently found two alleles in the corresponding region of dog (Ito et al., 2004).

In poultry, reports of dopamine receptors are few. Chicken DRD1, which consists of 3 subtypes (D1A, D1B and D1D) (Demchyshyn et al., 1995), and turkey DRD2 (Schnell et al., 1999) have been reported. However, there has been no report about DRD4 homologue in birds. In the present study, to help elucidate the genetics of behavior in birds, we investigated the exon I region of DRD4 in major poultry species, namely Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), chicken (Gallus gallus), ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) and helmeted guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). In addition, we investigated Japanese cormorant (Phalacrocorax capillatus) and Japanese jungle crow (Corvus macro-rhynchos) as an out-group. Japanese cormorants are used for a type of fishing called “u-kai”, a traditional method of catching sweetfish (Inoue-Murayama et al., 2002). Japanese jungle crows are regarded as one of the injurious birds and, hence, an understanding of their behavior would be useful to reduce damages (Yamamoto et al., 2001).


We investigated the corresponding regions in avian DRD4 employing the following species: Japanese quail (n=96), chicken (12 breeds; n=492), ring-necked pheasant (n=20), helmeted guinea fowl (n=200), Japanese cormorant (n=23) and Japanese jungle crow (n=16). Japanese quail were sampled from a colony maintained at Gifu University. Among the 12 breeds of chicken, White Leghorn (n=145) and Fayoumi (n=115) were obtained from both Nippon Institute of Biological Science (NIBS) (Kobuchizawa, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan) and National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science (NILGS) (Tsukuba, Japan); Black Minorca (n=22) were from NIBS. Three Japanese native fowls, Tsushimajidori (n=40), Tosajidori (n=10) and Hinaidori (n=40), and Hamburg (n=10), Brabanter (n=10), Araucana (n=10), Silky (n=10), Rhode Island Red (n=40) and Barred Plymouth Rock (n=40) were all sampled from NILGS. Helmeted guinea fowls and ring-necked pheasants were obtained from JAFRA TRADING CO. LTD (Kasumigaura, Ibaragi Prefecture, Japan) and a pheasant farm (Kiwa, Mie Prefecture, Japan) respectively, while Japanese cormorants were sampled from a stock kept by a master of cormorant fishing on the Nagara River in the city of Gifu. Japanese jungle crows were wild-derived and kept in Keio University (Tokyo, Japan).

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using the QIAamp blood kit (Qiagen, CA, USA). The genomic DNA of quail was amplified using the F (5′-CGCCATGGGGAACCGCAG-3′) and R (5′-CGGCTCACCTCGGAGTAGA-3′) primers of exon I polymorphic region of DRD4 reported in humans (Catalano et al., 1993). Ten μl of reaction mixtures containing 0.5 U LA Taq polymelase, GC buffer I (TaKaRa, Shiga Prefecture, Japan), 20–50 ng of template DNA, 0.5 μM of each primer, and 400 μM of each dNTP were used. After an initial incubation at 95°C for 2 min, PCR amplification was performed for 35 cycles consisting of 95°C for 30 sec, 65°C for 1 min, and 74°C for 2 min, followed by a final extension at 74°C for 10 min. PCR products were cloned into TA cloning vector pCR2.1 (Invitrogen Corp., CA, USA) and sequenced by the dye termination method using an ABI 3100 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA).

Fluorescent-labeled F2 (5′-CCCGTGCAACGGCACCG-3′), F3 (5′-GGCCGCCCCGTGCAACGGCA-3′) and R2 (5′-AGTAGACGTAGAGGGGCAG-3′), R3 (5′-GAGGGGCAGGACGAGGAG-3′), R4 (5′-CGGCGACGGCGAGGCTGACGATGAA-3′) primers were then designed on the basis of the quail sequence, and these primers were used for the subsequent PCR and sequencing of the other species. For genotyping, fluorescent-labeled forward and reverse primers were employed and product size was detected by GeneScan systems using an ABI 3100 DNA Sequencer.


PCR amplification of DRD4 exon I corresponding region and determination of sequence

By using just the original pair of F and R primers initially reported in humans, the DNA of Japanese quail could be successfully amplified. The nucleotide sequences of the remaining 5 species (chicken, ring-necked pheasant, helmeted guinea fowl, Japanese cormorant, and Japanese jungle crow) were determined using new pairs of primers (F2+R3 for chicken, F3+R3 for ring-necked pheasant and helmeted guinea fowl, F2+R4 for Japanese cormorant, and F2+R2 for Japanese jungle crow) designed from the Japanese quail sequence (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Multiple alignments of the nucleotide (A) and deduced amino acid (B) sequences of the DRD4 exon I corresponding region. The human sequence was previously reported (Accession No.  L12398). Boxes indicate repeated regions in the human longer allele. Primer combinations for amplification were: F2+R3 in chicken, F3+R3 in ring-necked pheasant and helmeted guinea fowl, F2+R4 in Japanese cormorant, and F2+R2 in Japanese jungle crow. The chicken sequence was derived from White Leghorn with 9 repeats of proline. In Black Minorca, only 8 repeats of proline were observed. The flanking sequences of the 2 breeds were identical. Dots indicate sequence identity with the human sequence, while dashes represent gaps introduced to optimize the alignment. Arrows indicate coding sequences of primers and underlined parts correspond to repeat of CCT/G or proline. Transmembrane regions 1 and 2 are indicated above amino acids alignment. 1: Japanese quail, 2: White Leghorn, 3: Black Minorca, 4: Ring-necked pheasant, 5: Helmeted guinea fowl, 6: Japanese cormorant, 7: Japanese jungle crow. These sequences can be obtained from the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank nucleotide sequence database with the accession numbers,  AB125362,  AB125363,  AB125364,  AB166867,  AB166868,  AB166869,  AB125365, respectively.


In the upstream of transmembrane 1 (29th–56th amino acid residue of the human sequence), humans and poultry (Japanese quail, chicken, ring-necked pheasant, helmeted guinea fowl) showed low sequence similarity. The human sequence includes a polymorphic region based on insertion/deletion of 4 amino acids. In contrast, the poultry sequences had a repeat of proline at the corresponding region. In the downstream of transmembrane 1, they showed higher similarity with the human sequence. In this region, the homology of amino acid sequence was 71.8% between humans and Japanese quail, and 69.4% between humans and chicken.

Poultry species of the order Galliformes were similar to each other in the whole sequence. Sequences of Japanese quail and chicken were similar except for the substitution of 8 nucleotides (1 amino acid). Among the Galliformes investigated, chicken and helmeted guinea fowl had the highest sequence similarity, showing only 3 nucleotide substitutions. Hydrophobic amino acids included in the transmembrane region were not replaced with hydrophilic amino acid by substitution.

By comparing the Japanese quail sequence with the five human dopamine receptor subtypes, human D4 showed the highest homology (58.9%; 73 amino acids) while human D1 had the lowest homology (52.1%; 48 amino acids). When compared with the three subtypes of chicken dopamine receptor, D1A, D1B and D1D (Demchyshyn et al., 1995), D1A showed the highest homology (52.1%; 48 amino acids) while D1B had the lowest (40.8%; 76 amino acids). Finally, comparison with the turkey D2 (Schnell et al., 1999) showed a homology of 66.7% (51 amino acids).

Polymorphism of the number of proline repeats

The repeat of proline was identified in the region corresponding to the human polymorphic region. The repeat number of proline was 9 in Japanese quail, ring-necked pheasant and Japanese cormorant; 12 in helmeted guinea fowl; and 3 in Japanese jungle crow. No polymorphism was found in these species. In chicken, however, polymorphism was found in the repeat number of proline (Table 1). Black Minorca had only 8 repeats (allele 8), whereas Tosajidori, Silky, Araucana, Hamburg and Brabanter had only 9 repeats (allele 9). Intra-breed polymorphism was observed in White Leghorn, Barred Plymouth Rock, Rhode Island Red, Tsushimajidori, Hinaidori and Fayoumi, and two alleles (alleles 8 and 9) were detected in these breeds. The sequences of both alleles were identical except for the proline repeat. By the analyses of families including heterozygous individuals, Mendelian inheritance was confirmed (data not shown).

Table 1

Allele frequency distribution of DRD4 exon I corresponding region in 12 chicken breeds.



Among five human dopamine receptor subtypes, the sequence amplified in the Japanese quail showed the highest homology with that of the D4 dopamine receptor suggesting amplification of orthologous region. The sequence that we found showed low homologies (40.8–66.7%) with dopamine receptors reported in birds, chicken D1 like D1A, D1B and D1D receptors (Demchyshyn et al., 1995) and turkey D2 receptor (Schnell et al., 1999).

The DRD4 exon I sequences of the avian species that we studied showed low homologies with that in humans. This may be due to the evolutionary distance between humans and Aves. The human polymorphic region exists in an extra cellular region and is not a ligand binding site. Thus, the effect of polymophism on signal transduction is not defined. This region may have another function or may be linked to an unknown functional site in exons. In humans, recombinant proteins of both alleles in exon I are reported to have a minor effect with respect to antipsychotic, quinpirole and clozapine in vitro. However, no functional differences were detected for receptor activation by dopamine (Zenner et al., 1998).

Polymorphism of avian DRD4 exon I was due to variation in the number of proline repeats, in contrast to the insertion/deletion of 4 amino acid residues found in humans. It has been reported that the proline-rich motif has a WW domain binding region (Chen and Sudol, 1995) and that WW domain-containing proteins participate in signal transduction (Lu et al., 1999), transcriptional regulation (Sudol et al., 2001) and pre-mRNA splicing (Bedford et al., 1998). Further investigation would thus be required concerning the effect of polymorphism in this region.

Allele frequency distribution indicated that intra-breed polymorphism was present in 6 chicken breeds. No relationship was found between the allele frequency and phylogeny of breeds. For example, Tosajidori and White Leghorn had allele 9 predominantly, although both are remotely related by the principal component analysis based on polymorphism of 7 blood protein loci among 25 chicken breeds (Tanabe et al., 1991). Also, Tsushimajidori and Rhode Island Red had the same predominant allele 8 although they are remotely related.

Black Minorca had only the allele 8, implying that this may be a consequence of selection for decorative use of this breed. Other breeds with frequent allele 8, Barred Plymouth Rock, Rhode Island Red, Tsushimajidori and Hinaidori, are mainly used as the meat chicken. However, Tosajidori with only allele 9, is also used as the meat chicken and the relation with use of the breed is not clear. A survey of more chicken breeds would thus be necessary to ascertain the relation. Since Black Minorcas are noted to be acutely sensitive for sound (Mizutani, 2000), this behavioral trait may be associated with the allele 8. An attempt by the authors to analyze the relation between alleles and behavioral traits in chicken is ongoing.

The repeat numbers of proline were different between species. Species of the order Galliformes and Japanese cormorant (order Pelecaniformes) had higher (8 and more) repeat number, while Japanese jungle crow (order Passeriformes) had only 3. The comparison of wide range avian species will provide a history of expansion of the repeat numbers in avian species. Among species in the order Galliformes, if the relation between behavioral traits and genetic polymorphism is found, it would be of great use for stock improvement. Recently, a lot of reports on behavior in crows have been published. In the Northwestern crow (Corvus caurinus), their prey characteristics were investigated (Ha and Ha, 2003) while in the Spanish carrion crow (Corvus corone corone), social behavior was variable between populations and individuals (Baglione et al., 2002). Although we could not find polymorphism among the 16 jungle crows studied, a further survey of more individuals/species could derive some information about the genetic background of such behaviors.

Polymorphism of DRD4 exon I is related to delusional disorder in humans. In this study, polymorphism in chicken was found in the corresponding region of humans. It possibly causes an individual difference in behavioral trait and is possibly related to psychotic disorder in poultry as well as in humans. However, since sequence of polymorphic region is greatly different between humans and birds, the function of the polymorphism cannot be predicted.

Human DRD4 is polymorphic in terms of the repeat number of the 48-bp sequence in exon III (Van Tol et al., 1992) and it has been demonstrated that the DRD4 geno-type is possibly related to personality known as novelty seeking (Benjamin et al., 1996; Ebstein et al., 1996). We previously found that the DRD4 exon III region is also polymorphic in the dog (Canis familiaris) (Niimi et al., 1999; Niimi et al., 2001) and we reported polymorphisms between inter-and intra-species. In this study, we investigated the exon III in poultry but no polymorphism was found.

This is the first report on variation in a neurotransmitter-related gene in birds. This polymorphism would contribute significant information for elucidation of differences in behavioral traits in chicken breeds. To figure out the whole dopamine function at synapsis, studies of genetic variation of other dopamine-related proteins, dopamine transporter for reuptaking (Sabol et al., 1999) and catechol-O-methyltransferase for resolution (Rujescu et al., 2003), will be necessary. To clarify the genetic background of behavior, it would be also necessary to analyze other genes that have been suggested to play some role in human personality, such as serotonin transporter (Lesch et al., 1996).


We gratefully acknowledge Ms Y. Ueda, Gifu University, for her technical support. This study was funded in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15653056) to SW from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and a grant (2001–2003) to MI from the National Agriculture and Bio-oriented Research Organization (NARO), Japan.


  1. V. Baglione, J. M. Marcos, and D. Canestrari . 2002. Cooperatively breeding groups of carrion crow (Corvus corone corone) in northern Spain. Auk 119:790–799. Google Scholar

  2. M. T. Bedford, R. Reed, and P. Leder . 1998. WW domain-mediated interactions reveal a spliceosome-associated protein that binds a third class of proline-rich motif: the proline glycine and methionine-rich motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10602–10607. Google Scholar

  3. R. G. Beilharz and D. F. Cox . 1967. Genetic analysis of open field behavior in swine. J Anim Sci 26:988–990. Google Scholar

  4. J. Benjamin, L. Li, C. Patterson, B. D. Greenberg, D. L. Murphy, and D. H. Hamer . 1996. Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet 12:81–84. Google Scholar

  5. M. Catalano, M. Nobile, E. Novelli, M. M. Nöthen, and E. Smeraldi . 1993. Distribution of a novel mutation in the first exon of the human dopamine D4 receptor gene in psychotic patients. Biol Psychiatry 34:459–464. Google Scholar

  6. H. I. Chen and M. Sudol . 1995. The WW domain of Yes-associated protein binds a proline-rich ligand that differs from the consensus established for Src homology 3-binding modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7819–7823. Google Scholar

  7. L. L. Demchyshyn, K. S. Sugamori, F. J. S. Lee, S. A. Hamadanizadeh, and H. B. Niznik . 1995. The dopamine D1D receptor. Cloning and characterization of three pharmacologically distinct D1-like receptors from Gallus domesticus. J Biol Chem 270:4005–4012. Google Scholar

  8. R. P. Ebstein, O. Novick, R. Umansky, B. Priel, Y. Osher, D. Blaine, E. R. Bennett, L. Nemanov, M. Katz, and R. H. Belmaker . 1996. Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet 12:78–80. Google Scholar

  9. G. C. Emmans and D. R. Charles . 1976. Climatic environment and poultry feeding in practice. In “Nutrition and the Climatic Environment Vol 10”. Ed by W. Haresign, H. Swan, and D. Lewis . Butterworth. London. pp. 31–49. Google Scholar

  10. M. Gauly, H. Mathiak, K. Hoffmann, M. Kraus, and G. Erhardt . 2001. Estimating genetic variability in temperamental traits in German Angus and Simmental cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 74:109–119. Google Scholar

  11. R. R. Ha and J. C. Ha . 2003. Effects of ecology and prey characteristics on the use of alternative social foraging tactics in crows, Corvus caurinus. Anim Behav 66:309–316. Google Scholar

  12. M. Inoue-Murayama, Y. Ueda, T. Yamashita, C. Nishida-Umehara, Y. Matsuda, T. Masegi, and S. Ito . 2002. Molecular sexing of Japanese cormorants used for traditional fishing on the Nagara River in Gifu City. Anim Sci J 73:417–420. Google Scholar

  13. H. Ito, H. Nara, M. Inoue-Murayama, M. K. Shimada, A. Koshimura, Y. Ueda, H. Kitagawa, Y. Takeuchi, Y. Mori, Y. Murayama, M. Morita, T. Iwasaki, K. Ôta, Y. Tanabe, and S. Ito . 2004. Allele frequency distribution of the canine dopamine receptor D4 gene exon III and I in 23 breeds. J Vet Med Sci 66:815–820. Google Scholar

  14. R. B. Jones, D. G. Satterlee, and H. L. Marks . 1997. Fear-related behaviour in Japanese quail divergently selected for body weight. Appl Anim Behav Sci 52:87–98. Google Scholar

  15. K. P. Lesch, D. Bengel, A. Heils, S. Z. Sabol, B. D. Greenberg, S. Petri, J. Benjamin, C. R. Müller, D. H. Hamer, and D. L. Murphy . 1996. Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 274:1527–1531. Google Scholar

  16. P. J. Lu, X. Z. Zhou, M. Shen, and K. P. Lu . 1999. Function of WW domains as phosphoserine- or phosphothreonine-binding modules. Science 283:1325–1328. Google Scholar

  17. M. Mizutani 2000. Inbred strains, closed colonies, and mutant strains (animal models) in chicken and Japanese quail maintained in NIBS. J Anim Genet 28:45–58. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

  18. M. Nei and A. K. Roychoudhury . 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76:379–390. Google Scholar

  19. Y. Niimi, M. Inoue-Murayama, Y. Murayama, S. Ito, and T. Iwasaki . 1999. Allelic variation of the D4 dopamine receptor polymorphic region in two dog breeds, Golden retriever and Shiba. J Vet Med Sci 61:1281–1286. Google Scholar

  20. Y. Niimi, M. Inoue-Murayama, K. Kato, N. Matsuura, Y. Murayama, S. Ito, Y. Momoi, K. Konno, and T. Iwasaki . 2001. Breed differences in allele frequency of the dopamine receptor D4 gene in dogs. J Hered 92:433–436. Google Scholar

  21. Y. Okuyama, H. Ishiguro, M. Toru, and T. Arinami . 1999. A genetic polymorphism in the promoter region of DRD4 associated with expression and schizophrenia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 258:292–295. Google Scholar

  22. D. Rujescu, I. Giegling, A. Gietl, A. M. Hartmann, and H-J. Möller . 2003. A functional single nucleotide polymorphism (V158M) in the COMT gene is associated with aggressive personality traits. Biol Psychiatry 54:34–39. Google Scholar

  23. S. Z. Sabol, M. L. Nelson, C. Fisher, L. Gunzerath, C. L. Brody, S. Hu, L. A. Sirota, S. E. Marcus, B. D. Greenberg, F. R. Lucas 4th, J. Benjamin, D. L. Murphy, and D. H. Hamer . 1999. A genetic association for cigarette smoking bahavior. Health Psychol 18:7–13. Google Scholar

  24. C. J. Savory 1995. Feather pecking and cannibalism. World Poultry Sci J 51:215–219. Google Scholar

  25. S. A. Schnell, S. You, D. N. Foster, and M. E. El Halawani . 1999. Molecular cloning and tissue distribution of an avian D2 dopamine receptor mRNA from the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). J Comp Neurol 407:543–554. Google Scholar

  26. P. Seeman and H. H. M. Van Tol . 1994. Dopamine receptor pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 15:264–270. Google Scholar

  27. M. Sudol, K. Sliwa, and T. Russo . 2001. Functions of WW domains in the nucleus. FEBS Lett 490:190–195. Google Scholar

  28. Y. Tanabe, T. Iida, H. Yoshino, A. Shinjo, and S. Muramatsu . 1991. Studies on the phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese native fowl breeds. Jpn Poult Sci 28:266–277. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

  29. R. Tauson and S. A. Svensson . 1980. Influence of plumage condition on the hen's feed requirement. Swed J Agr Res 10:35–39. Google Scholar

  30. S. G. Tullett, M. G. MacLeod, and T. R. Jewitt . 1980. The effects of partial defeathering on energy metabolism in the laying fowl. Brit Poult Sci 21:241–245. Google Scholar

  31. E. van Erp-van der Kooij, A. H. Kuijpers, J. W. Schrama, E. D. Ekkel, and M. J. M. Tielen . 2000. Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs and their impact on production. Appl Anim Behav Sci 66:171–185. Google Scholar

  32. H. H. M. Van Tol, J. R. Bunzow, H. C. Guan, R. K. Sunahara, P. Seeman, H. B. Niznik, and O. Civelli . 1991. Cloning of the gene for a human dopamine D4 receptor with high affinity for the antipsychotic clozapine. Nature 350:610–614. Google Scholar

  33. H. H. M. Van Tol, C. M. Wu, H. C. Guan, K. Ohara, J. R. Bunzow, O. Civelli, J. Kennedy, P. Seeman, H. B. Niznik, and V. Jovanovic . 1992. Multiple dopamine D4 receptor variants in the human population. Nature 358:149–152. Google Scholar

  34. K. S. Vestergaard, J. P. Kruijt, and J. A. Hogan . 1993. Feather pecking and chronic fear in groups of Red Jungle Fowl: their relations to dustbathing, rearing environment and social status. Anim Behav 45:1127–1140. Google Scholar

  35. J. M. Watts, J. M. Stookey, S. M. Schmutz, and C. S. Waltz . 2001. Variability in vocal and behavioural responses to visual isolation between full-sibling families of beef calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci 70:255–273. Google Scholar

  36. K. Yamamoto, I. Furuya, and S. Watanabe . 2001. Near-field visual acuity in Japanese jungle crows (Corvus macrorhynchos). Physiol Behav 72:283–286. Google Scholar

  37. M. T. Zenner, M. Nobile, R. Henningsen, E. Smeraldi, O. Civelli, D. S. Hartman, and M. Catalano . 1998. Expression and characterization of a dopamine D4R variant associated with delusional disorder. FEBS Lett 422:146–150. Google Scholar

Akinori Sugiyama, Miho Inoue-Murayama, Mitsuru Miwa, Riyako Ohashi, Boniface Baboreka Kayang, Makoto Mizutani, Keijiro Nirasawa, Masaharu Odai, Mitsuru Minezawa, Shigeru Watanabe, and Shińichi Ito "Polymorphism of Dopamine Receptor D4 Exon I Corresponding Region in Chicken," Zoological Science 21(9), (1 September 2004).
Received: 15 April 2004; Accepted: 1 June 2004; Published: 1 September 2004

Back to Top