A literature-based taxonomic catalogue of the nemertean species (Phylum Nemertea) reported from Japanese waters is provided, listing 19 families, 45 genera, and 120 species as valid. Applications of the following species names to forms previously recorded from Japanese waters are regarded as uncertain: Amphiporus cervicalis, Amphiporus depressus, Amphiporus lactifloreus, Cephalothrix filiformis, Cephalothrix linearis, Cerebratulus fuscus, Lineus vegetus, Lineus bilineatus, Lineus gesserensis, Lineus grubei, Lineus longifissus, Lineus mcintoshii, Nipponnemertes pulchra, Oerstedia venusta, Prostoma graecense, and Prostoma grande. The identities of the taxa referred to by the following four nominal species require clarification through future investigations: Cosmocephala japonica, Dicelis rubra, Dichilus obscurus, and Nareda serpentina. The nominal species established from Japanese waters are tabulated. In addition, a brief history of taxonomic research on Japanese nemerteans is reviewed.
INTRODUCTION
The phylum Nemertea comprises about 1,200 species (Gibson, 1995). Nemerteans are distributed worldwide, mostly in marine benthic habitats, though some species have adapted to live in pelagic, freshwater, and land habitats. Nemerteans are basically carnivorous, feeding on small crustaceans, polychaetes, and mollusks (McDermott and Roe, 1985). They are distinct from other metazoans by possessing a unique organ, the proboscis, which is housed in a fluid-filled cavity, the rhynchocoel, and eversible when used in prey capture. The phylum is currently regarded as the sister taxon to the Neotrochozoa (comprising the Annelida, Echiura, Mollusca, and Sipuncula) (Jenner, 2004). Morphological characters supporting the close relationship between the Nemertea and Neotrochozoa include: 1) modified coelomic cavities derived by schizocoely (Turbeville, 1986) and lined by mesothelium, with at least some cells bearing rudimentary cilia (Turbeville and Ruppert, 1985; Turbeville, 1991, 2002); 2) a gliointerstitial cell system (Turbeville and Ruppert, 1985; Turbeville, 1991, 2002); and 3) the prototroch, a transitory larval structure consisting of a preblastoporal belt of specialized cells derived from the trochoblast cell lineage (Maslakova et al., 2004a, b).
Despite considerable efforts by previous researchers, a number of undescribed nemerteans remain in Japanese waters, especially those in the southwestern part (Kajihara, 2001). The only recent listing of previously described Japanese species is the checklist of Crandall et al. (2002), but the relevant literature is scattered. The present catalogue, identifying 19 families, 45 genera, and 120 species so far reported from Japanese waters as valid, has been compiled to integrate this scattered nemertean literature and to point out taxonomic issues to be resolved for the species already described, in order to offer a perspective for future studies.
Generally, the ideal situation for taxonomic studies is that name-bearing type specimens for every nominal species are extant and available. The present study revealed, however, that type specimens are either unavailable or unlocated for 45 out of 101 nominal species established from Japanese waters (Tables 1, 2).
Table. 1.
List of the nominal species established from Japanese waters arranged by their type locality from north to south. *Type specimen depository: FI Dr. Iwata's collection; LBM Lake Biwa Museum, Shiga, Japan; NHMW-EV Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Evertebrata-Varia, Wien, Austria; U unavailable; ZIHU Hokkaido University Museum, Sapporo, Japan; ? unlocated.
Table. 1.
Continued.
Table. 2.
List of the nominal species established from Japanese waters arranged taxonomically. *Type specimen depository: FI Professor Fumio Iwata's collection; LBM Lake Biwa Museum, Shiga, Japan; NHMW-EV Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Evertebrata-Varia, Wien, Austria; U unavailable; ZIHU Hokkaido University Museum, Sapporo, Japan; ? unlocated.
Table. 2.
Continued.
While modern nemertean taxonomy depends upon the examination of internal structures from serially sectioned material (Gibson, 1985), virtually all of the original descriptions made by Stimpson and Takakura lack such information (Stimpson, 1855, 1857; Takakura, 1898). Fortunately, most of these species can be identified by their external features, but their systematic position requires reappraisal based on their internal morphology. Since most of the type material of early researchers, viz., Stimpson, Takakura, and Yamaoka, is unavailable (Nishimura, 1992; Kajihara, 2004; see the following section, “Brief History…”), re-collection of the species established by them is essential to correctly determine taxonomic identity.
Throughout the text and tables, “Code” and “ICZN” refer to the International Code for Zoological Nomenclature and the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, respectively.
Brief History of Taxonomic Research on Japanese Nemerteans
William Stimpson (1832–1872) first reported nemerteans from Japanese waters (Stimpson, 1855). During the cruise of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition (1852–1856), in which Stimpson participated as a naturalist in zoology at the age of 21, he established 15 nominal species of nemerteans from Naha (Okinawa), Kikaishima (Kagoshima), Amamiôshima (Kagoshima), Shimoda (Shizuoka), and Hakodate (Hokkaidô) (Stimpson, 1855, 1857). Regrettably, his nemertean samples were lost in the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, together with his manuscripts, drawings, and other invertebrate collections obtained by the expedition (Nishimura, 1992). Even though Stimpson's descriptions are brief and composed of only a few lines, eight of 15 species of nemerteans he described from Japanese waters are still regarded as valid.
Dr. Albrecht von Roretz (1846–1884), a medical doctor who graduated from the University of Wien, came to Japan towards the end of 1874 as Consultats-Arzt for the Austro-Hungarian embassy in East Asia. From 1875 to 1882, when Roretz returned to Austria, he made sampling trips to the four major islands in Japan, namely Hokkaidô, Honshû, Shikoku, and Kyûshû. Roretz's Japanese animal collection, now deposited in the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Austria, consists of more than 1,450 individuals ranging from sponges to mammals and comprises about 360 species (Nishikawa and Sattmann, 2001). Senz (1997a, 2001) recently described two new species based on nemertean specimens in Roretz's collection.
In 1875 the British Naval research vessel H.M.S. Challenger dropped into Japanese harbors in the course of her round-the-world scientific voyage, making collections at about 10 locations in Japanese waters (Tizard et al., 1885). Ambrosius Arnold Willem Hubrecht (1853–1915), Professor of Zoology at Utrecht University, reported the nemerteans obtained during the cruise; his report includes two species of nemerteans collected from Japanese waters (Hubrecht, 1887). One of the major zoological findings made by the Challenger expedition is the discovery of bathypelagic nemerteans. The first specimen was found on 7 March 1874 near the southern verge of the South-Australian current and named Pelagonemertes rollestoni by Moseley (1875a). A second specimen, collected on 5 June 1875 off Sagami Bay, was first considered to be a young individual of the same species (Moseley, 1875b), but was later deemed to represent a different species and named Pelagonemertes moseleyi by Bürger (1895).
In 1906 the United States Fisheries Commission Steamer Albatross visited Japanese waters, with the ichthyologist Charles Henry Gilbert as the Naturalist-in-Charge. The nemerteans among the numerous specimens collected were studied by Coe (1944) and included several new locality records for species already known.
In the same year, 1906, Dr. Harold Heath secured from Mr. Alan Owston six specimens of pelagic nemertean species, which Foshay (1912) later described as Nectonemertes japonica.
Usamaro Takakura (1867–1944), Professor of Zoology first at the Higher Normal School (later renamed Tokyo Higher Normal School), then concurrently at Tokyo University of Literature and Science, was the first Japanese expert on nemerteans. Takakura reported 25 species and established 14 new species and one new genus, based primarily upon material from the Pacific coast of Honshû (Takakura, 1897, 1898, 1910, 1922, 1933). Takakura's principal work is his 1898 paper, which contains descriptions of 21 anoplan nemerteans from the vicinity of Misaki. Takakura's nemertean collection appears to have been lost during the relocation of Tokyo University of Education from Tokyo to Tsukuba (Kajihara, 2004).
Teiichi Yamaoka (ca. 1918–1945?) carried out taxonomic studies on nemerteans in his graduate studies under the guidance of Professor Tohru Uchida at Hokkaido Imperial University. After graduating in 1939, he became a researcher at Mitsui Marine Biological Station at Izu before he moved to the capital of Manchuria as a teacher at Shinkyô First Junior High School in 1940. Before he moved to Manchuria, he published two papers in which he reported 23 species (including seven new species) of nemerteans from Japanese waters (Yamaoka, 19040a, b). In addition, he reported two species from Taiwan, of which one was new to science, based on the specimens obtained by Dr. Shirô Okuda (Yamaoka, 1939). Yamaoka also published a paper on the entocommensal species Malacobdella japonica Takakura, 1897 in collaboration with Saburô Kawai (Kawai and Yamaoka, 1940) and wrote a chapter on nemerteans in a treatise on systematic zoology (Yamaoka, 1943). When Yamaoka had been a researcher at Mitsui Marine Biological Station, he prepared a manuscript that contained descriptions of several ‘new’ species, but the manuscript was not published before his death. Later, Dr. Okuda included four of these ‘new’ species in the Revised Edition Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Fauna of Japan (Exclusive of Insects), with each of the four entries accompanied by a brief description. Crandall et al. (2001) argued that these four names are available in terms of the Code (ICZN, 1999), with Yamaoka as the naming authority and the date of publication 1947, the date when the Encyclopedia was published. Crandall et al. (2001) provided additional information on these four species in Yamaoka's unpublished manuscript, which had been in the care of Dr. Fumio Iwata. Quite recently, the manuscript was posthumously published (Yamaoka, 2005), submitted by Professor Iwata.
Much of our knowledge of the Japanese nemertean fauna depends upon the works by Dr. Fumio Iwata (b. 1925), Professor Emeritus of Hokkaido University. As with Yamaoka, Fumio Iwata began his nemertean studies under the guidance of Professor Uchida at Hokkaido University. After graduation in 1950, he was appointed as Assistant Professor at Akkeshi Marine Biological Station (Moriyama, 1995). He energetically investigated the nemertean fauna in various regions of Japan, as well as engaged in embryological studies on nemerteans. He published nine nemertean papers (Iwata, 1951, 1952, 1954a, Iwata, b, c, 1957a, Iwata, b, 1958, 1960a) before obtaining his doctorate in 1959 with a dissertation on the comparative embryology of nemerteans (Iwata, 1960b), in which he proposed the new order Archinemertea that he considered to be the most primitive group in the phylum. Although adopted by some researchers (e.g., Gibson, 1994), Iwata's (1960b) hypothesis was later questioned by Sundberg and Hylbom (1994), who found no morphological support for the Archinemertea. This group has lost acceptance among other nemertean researchers, since it is now regarded to be a group within the palaeonemerteans (Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003). However, Iwata's (1960b) embryological observations themselves are highly valued and frequently cited by modern researchers (e.g., Maslakova et al., 2004a, b; Nielsen, 2005). After receiving an Associate Professorship in Sapporo in 1963, Iwata wrote the chapter on nemerteans in a treatise on systematic zoology (Iwata, 1965a), descriptions of a parasitic nemertean in bivalves (Iwata, 1967) and three brackish-water nemerteans (Iwata, 1970a), another embryological paper (Iwata, 1972), and the chapter on nemerteans in a treatise on freshwater biology (Iwata, 1973). He was appointed to a Professorship in 1974. Iwata has attended all the international meetings on nemertean biology, held in 1983 (Philadelphia, USA), 1986 (Tjärnö, Sweden), 1991 (Bangor, UK), 1995 (Asilomar, California, USA), 2000 (Alcalá de Henares, Spain), and 2004 (Ogden, Utah, USA), and presented papers (Iwata, 1985, 1988, 1993, 2006). Even after retiring in 1988, Dr. Iwata is still quite active in research (Iwata, 2001).
Other taxonomic works on Japanese nemerteans include papers on freshwater nemerteans by Ikeda (1913), Ishizuka (1933), Sudzuki (1953), and Chernyshev et al. (1998); a report on the pelagic species Pelagonemertes moseley Bürger, 1895 by Kato and Tanaka (1938); Kato's (1939) description of the luminescent nemertean Emplectonema kandai Kato, 1939; Oki et al.'s (1987) report on the land nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863; and reports on some marine benthic (Kajihara, 2002, 2006, 2007a, Kajihara, b; Kajihara et al., 2000, 2001) and a brackish-water (Kajihara et al., 2003) species.
Classification and Checklist of the Valid Japanese Nemertean Species
The higher classification system adopted here is based on Gibson (1982a, b, 1994), Chernyshev (1995, 2003), and Thollesson and Norenburg (2003).
Phylum NEMERTEA
1) Class PALAEONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
1) Family CALLINERIDAE Bergendal, 1901
1) Callinera nishikawai Kajihara, 2006
2) Family CEPHALOTRICHIDAE McIntosh, 1874
2) Cephalothrix fasciculus (Iwata, 1952)
3) Cephalothrix notabilis Iwata, 1954
4) Cephalothrix simula (Iwata, 1952)
3) Family TUBULANIDAE Bürger, 1904 (1874)
5) Carinesta uchidai Iwata, 1952
6) Carinina plecta Kajihara, 2006
7) Tubulanus capistratus (Coe, 1901)
8) Tubulanus ezoensis Yamaoka, 1940
9) Tubulanus lucidus Iwata, 1952
10) Tubulanus punctatus (Takakura, 1898)
11) Tubulanus roretzi Senz, 1997
2) Class PILIDIOPHORA Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003
4) Family HUBRECHTELLIDAE Chernyshev, 2003
12) Hubrechtella ijimai (Takakura, 1922)
13) Hubrechtella kimuraorum Kajihara, 2006
14) Tetramys ramicerebrus Iwata, 1957
5) Family LINEIDAE McIntosh, 1874
15) Cerebratulus albocirculus Iwata, 1957
16) Cerebratulus carnosus Takakura, 1898
17) Cerebratulus communis Takakura, 1898
18) Cerebratulus fasciatus Stimpson, 1857
19) Cerebratulus formosus Iwata, 1957
20) Cerebratulus longiceps Coe, 1901
21) Cerebratulus macroren Hubrecht, 1887
22) Cerebratulus marginatus Renier, 1804
23) Cerebratulus montgomeryi Coe, 1901
24) Cerebratulus penniger Iwata, 1957
25) Cerebratulus subacutus (Stimpson, 1857)
26) Cerebratulus superniger Iwata, 1957
27) Cerebratulus zebra Punnett and Cooper, 1909
28) Diplopleura japonica Stimpson, 1857
29) Euborlasia gotoensis Iwata, 1952
30) Euborlasia proteres Iwata, 1957
31) Hinumanemertes kikuchii Iwata, 1970
32) Iwatanemertes piperata (Stimpson, 1855)
33) Lineus alborostratus Takakura, 1898
34) Lineus albovittatus (Stimpson, 1855)
35) Lineus bipunctatus Takakura, 1898
36) Lineus cancelli Iwata, 1954
37) Lineus caputornatus Takakura, 1898
38) Lineus fulvus Iwata, 1954
39) Lineus fuscoviridis Takakura, 1898
40) Lineus nigrofuscus (Stimpson, 1857)
41) Lineus nigrostriatus Iwata, 1954
42) Lineus nipponensis Senz, 2001
43) Lineus spatiosus Iwata, 1954
44) Lineus subcingulatus Takakura, 1898
45) Lineus torquatus Coe, 1901
46) Micrura akkeshiensis Yamaoka, 1940
47) Micrura alaskensis Coe, 1901
48) Micrura bella (Stimpson, 1857)
49) Micrura dorsovittata Takakura, 1898
50) Micrura japonica Iwata, 1952
51) Micrura magna Yamaoka, 1940
52) Micrura multinotara Iwata, 1957
53) Nipponomicrura uchidai (Yamaoka, 1940)
54) Notospermus geniculatus (Delle Chiaje, 1828)
55) Paralineopsis taki Iwata, 1993
56) Uchidana parasita Iwata, 1967
6) Family VALENCINIIDAE Hubrecht, 1879
57) Baseodiscus curtus (Hubrecht, 1879)
58) Baseodiscus delineatus (Delle Chiaje, 1825)
59) Baseodiscus hemprichii (Ehrenberg, 1831)
60) Baseodiscus nipponensis (Hubrecht, 1887)
61) Baseodiscus princeps (Coe, 1901)
62) Baseodiscus quinquelineatus (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833)
63) Cephalomastax brevis Iwata, 1957
3) Class HOPLONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
1) Subclass MONOSTILIFERA Brinkmann, 1917
7) Family AMPHIPORIDAE McIntosh, 1874
64) Amphiporus antifuscus Iwata, 1954
65) Amphiporus formidabilis Griffin, 1898
66) Amphiporus gelatinosus Coe, 1905
67) Amphiporus imparispinosus Griffin, 1898
68) Amphiporus insolitus Iwata, 1954
69) Amphiporus musculus Iwata, 1954
70) Amphiporus parvus Yamaoka, 1940
71) Amphiporus reduncus Iwata, 1957
72) Amphiporus regius Iwata, 1954
73) Amphiporus retrotumidus Iwata, 1957
74) Potamostoma shizunaiense Kajihara, Gibson and Mawatari, 2003
75) Zygonemertes glandulosa Yamaoka, 1940
76) Zygonemertes jamsteci Kajihara, 2002
77) Zygonemertes shintai Kajihara, 2002
8) Family CARCINONEMERTIDAE Sumner, Osburn and Cole, 1913
78) Carcinonemertes mitsukurii Takakura, 1910
9) Family CRATENEMERTIDAE Friedrich, 1968
79) Nipponnemertes bimaculata (Coe, 1901)
80) Nipponnemertes ogumai (Yamaoka, 1947)
81) Nipponnemertes punctatula (Coe, 1905)
10) Family EMPLECTONEMATIDAE Bürger, 1904
82) Emplectonema buergeri Coe, 1901
83) Emplectonema gracile (Johnston, 1837)
84) Emplectonema kandai Kato, 1939
85) Emplectonema mitsuii Yamaoka, 1947
86) Nemertopsis mitellicola Kajihara, 2007
87) Nemertopsis quadripunctata (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833)
88) Paranemertes incola Iwata, 1952
89) Paranemertes katoi Yamaoka, 1947
90) Paranemertes peregrina Coe, 1901
91) Paranemertes plana Iwata, 1957
11) Family MALACOBDELLIDAE Blanchard, 1847
92) Malacobdella japonica Takakura, 1897
12) Family OTOTYPHLONEMERTIDAE Bürger, 1895
93) Ototyphlonemertes dolichobasis Kajihara, 2007
94) Ototyphlonemertes martynovi Chernyshev, 1993
95) Ototyphlonemertes nikolaii Chernyshev, 1998
13) Family POSEIDONEMERTIDAE Chernyshev, 2002
96) Diopsonemertes acanthocephala Kajihara, Gibson and Mawatari, 2001
14) Family PROSORHOCHMIDAE Bürger, 1895
97) Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863
98) Pantinonemertes spectacula (Yamaoka, 1940)
15) Family TETRASTEMMATIDAE Hubrecht, 1879
99) Nemertellina yamaokai Kajihara, Gibson and Mawatari, 2000
100) Oerstedia dorsalis (Abildgaard, 1806)
101) Oerstedia polyorbis Iwata, 1954
102) Prostoma ohmiense Chernyshev, Timoshkin and Kawakatsu, 1998
103) Quasitetrastemma nigrifrons (Coe, 1904)
104) Quasitetrastemma stimpsoni (Chernyshev, 1992)
105) Sacconemertella lutulenta Iwata, 1970
106) Sacconemertopsis olivifera Iwata, 1970
107) Tetrastemma candidum (Müller, 1774)
108) Tetrastemma insolens Iwata, 1952
109) Tetrastemma melanocephalum (Johnston, 1837)
110) Tetrastemma pinnatum Iwata, 1954
111) Tetrastemma pseudocoronatum Chernyshev, 1998
112) Tetrastemma roseocephalum (Yamaoka, 1947)
113) Tetrastemma stigmatum Stimpson, 1857
114) Tetrastemma verinigrum Iwata, 1954
115) Tetrastemma yamaokai Iwata, 1954
2) Subclass POLYSTILIFERA Brinkmann, 1917
1) Order REPTANTIA Brinkmann, 1917
16) Family DREPANOPHORIDAE Verrill, 1892
116) Drepanophorus longiceps Iwata, 1957
117) Kameginemertes parmiornata (Iwata, 1957)
17) Family SAGAMINEMERTIDAE Chernyshev, 2003
118) Sagaminemertes nagaiensis (Iwata, 1957)
2) Order PELAGICA Brinkmann, 1917
18) Family NECTONEMERTIDAE Verrill, 1892
119) Nectonemertes japonica Foshay, 1912
19) Family PELAGONEMERTIDAE Moseley, 1875
120) Pelagonemertes moseleyi Bürger, 1895
Taxonomic Catalogue of Japanese Nemerteans
The entries in the synonymy for each species are arranged chronologically. For convenience, each authority in the synonymy is indicated in bold letters. Bibliographic information is given in the synonymy for both primary and secondary literature. For primary literature, such information as locality, habitat, and date of collection are also provided. The prefecture of each locality is given, to facilitate relocation and avoid confusion by synonymy of place names. Where applicable, a long vowel in place names is marked by a macron (e.g., Ê, â), to avoid confusion between, e.g., “Ôshima” and “Oshima.” The literature covered includes not only taxonomic papers, but also those on ecology and biochemistry, pictorial books, faunal reports, and field guides. Japanese common names that have previously been assigned are indicated for a number of species, but no attempt has been made to create new Japanese names for the remaining species. The following abbreviations are used to indicate museum depositories of specimens:
NHMW-EV
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Evertebrata-Varia, Wien, Austria.
USNM
National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
ZIHU
Hokkaido University Museum, Sapporo, Japan.
Phylum NEMERTEA
Class PALAEONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
Family CALLINERIDAE Bergendal, 1901
Genus Callinera Bergendal, 1900
Callinera Bergendal, 1900: 313.
TYPE SPECIES: Callinera buergeri Bergendal, 1900, by monotypic designation.
Callinera nishikawai Kajihara, 2006
Callinera nishikawai Kajihara, 2006: 17–27, figs. 11–14; sandy to muddy tidal flat, 34°41′04″N, 137°35′59″E, Ikarise, Hamanako Lake, Shizuoka Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-3133, 12 May 2002, collected by Taeko Kimura, Shoichi Kimura, and Teruaki Nishikawa, female, 6-μm serial transverse sections of an anterior body fragment about 1.5 cm in length and 0.8–1.0 mm in width, fixed in Bouin's fluid without anaesthetization.
NOTE: The species was described on the basis of a fixed anterior fragment of the body, and the shape of the living animal is unknown.
Family CEPHALOTRICHIDAE McIntosh, 1874
NOTE: Although the family name was incorrectly spelled as “Cephalothricidae” when established, the correct spelling of the family name should be “Cephalotrichidae” under Article 29.3 of the Code (ICZN, 1999), for the name of its type genus Cephalothrix gives the genitive singular “Cephalotrichos,” and thus the stem “Cephalotrich-.” Article 29.5 of the Code (ICZN, 1999) is not applicable, since the correct spelling has been widely used, e.g., by Bürger (1895: 533, 1904: 16), Wijnhoff (1913: 294), Coe (1930: 97, 1940: 257), Yamaoka (1940a: 215), Hylbom (1957: 553, 1993: 173), Moretto (1974: 9), Chernyshev (2004a: 152) and Tanu et al. (2004: 515).
Genus Cephalothrix Örsted, 1843
Cephalothrix Örsted, 1843: 573.
Procephalothrix Wijnhoff, 1913: 294; synonymized by Sundberg et al. (2003).
Cephalotrichella Wijnhoff, 1913: 298; synonymized by Sundberg et al. (2003).
TYPE SPECIES: Cephalothrix coeca Örsted, 1843, now regarded as a junior synonym of Planaria linearis Rathke, 1799 (Bürger, 1904), by subsequent designation.
NOTE: Gibson's (1995) assignment and Sundberg et al.'s (2003) statement of Cephalothrix linearis (Rathke, 1799) as the type species of the genus are irrelevant in terms of Articles 67.1.2 and 67.2 of the Code (ICZN, 1999), because the genus Cephalothrix contained only two nominal species, Cephalothrix bioculata and Cephalothrix coeca, when it was originally established.
Cephalothrix fasciculus (Iwata, 1952)
Procephalothrix fasciculus Iwata, 1952: 130, figs. 2, 8; under stones on stony beach near low-water level, Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture.
Procephalothrix fasciculasic [sic]: Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 16, 29, 36, 41.
NOTE: The species was originally classified in the genus Procephalothrix, which has been synonymized with Cephalothrix by Sundberg et al. (2003: 292); now it should be known as Cephalothrix fasciculus. The species is characterized by the posterior end of its rhynchocoel reaching the hind end of the body. This character state is absent among its congeners and has only been recorded in this species. At the same time, however, this character state can be erroneously identified by misinterpretation of a body fragment as an intact specimen. If the anus cannot be confirmed in the holotype specimen, the name of the nominal species Procephalothrix fasciculus should be regarded as a nomen dubium.
Cephalothrix notabilis Iwata, 1954 [Japanese name: shirayuki-himomushi or kita-hoso-himomushi]
Cephalothrix notabilis Iwata, 1954a: 8, fig. 1C, E, F; under stones near low-water level on stony beach, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 65. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 201. Iwata, 1992: 196, fig. 7-2A. Iwata, 1997: 55. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 26, 33.
Cephalothrix simula (Iwata, 1952) [Japanese name: akahana-himomushi]
Procephalothrix simulus [sic] Iwata, 1952: 132; under stones near low-water level, Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture; non Procephalothrix simula sensu Iwata (1954a), nec Cephalothrix linearis sensu Yamaoka (1940).
NOTE: The species was originally classified in the genus Procephalothrix, which was synonymized with Cephalothrix by Sundberg et al. (2003: 292); now it should be known as Cephalothrix simula. Iwata (1954a) synonymized Cephalothrix linearis sensu Yamaoka (1940) and Procephalothrix simula sensu Iwata (1954a) with Procephalothrix simula sensu Iwata (1952). Cephalothrix (=Procephalothrix) simula sensu Iwata (1952) is characterized by the absence between the rhynchocoel and alimentary canal of a longitudinal muscle plate (Iwata, 1952), which, however, is present in Cephalothrix linearis sensu Yamaoka (1940a) and Procephalothrix simula sensu Iwata (1954a). Therefore, I hesitate to apply the name Cephalothrix simula to the taxon to which the latter two authors referred. See NOTE under Cephalothrix linearis.
Family TUBULANIDAE Bürger, 1904 (1874)
NOTE: In response to Melville's (1986) proposal, ICZN (1988) ruled under Article 40b of the third edition of the Code (ICZN, 1985) that the name Tubulanidae has precedence over, but takes the date of, its senior subjective synonym Carinellidae. In his proposal, Melville (1986) stated that the name Carinella trilineata “has been regarded as a synonym of Tubulanus polymorphus since at least 1905,” referring to Bürger (1897–1907), and that the family Tubulanidae “should be cited with the date ‘1905 (1874).’” The ICZN's ruling, basically following Melville's proposal, states that “the name Tubulanidae Bürger, 1905 (1874) ... is hereby placed on the Official List of Family-Group Names in Zoology.” Bürger's (1897–1907) book was published in six different parts, and Melville (1986) was quite correct in that the relevant part about the replacement of Carinellidae with Tubulanidae was published in 1905 (pp. 401, 402, 405). However, the name Tubulanidae had already appeared prior to 1905 in Bürger (1904). Thus the family name should be cited as “Tubulanidae Bürger, 1904 (1874),” with the date of priority being enclosed in parentheses in accordance with Recommendation 40A of the Code (ICZN, 1985, 1999).
Genus Carinesta Punnett, 1900
Carinesta Punnett, 1900: 569.
TYPE SPECIES: Carinesta orientalis Punnett, 1900 by monotypic designation.
Carinesta uchidai Iwata, 1952 [Japanese name: kensaki-himomushi]
Carinesta uchidai Iwata, 1952: 128, fig. 7; under stones near low-water level, Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 2. Iwata, 1965a: 201. Iwata, 1965b: 391, figs. a, b. Iwata, 1992: 197. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 26, 33.
NOTE: Sundberg and Hylbom's (1994) cladistic analysis based on morphological characters shows that the genus Carinesta is a polyphyletic group and that Carinesta uchidai comprises a monophyletic group together with members of the family Cephalotrichidae. The generic placement of this species, as well as the taxonomic status of the genus Carinesta, requires reassessment.
Genus Carinina Hubrecht, 1885
Carinina Hubrecht, 1885: 830.
Procarinina Bergendal, 1902: 422; synonymized by Hylbom (1957).
TYPE SPECIES: Carinina grata Hubrecht, 1887, by monotypic designation; Hubrecht (1885) did not designate the type species when he erected the genus Carinina.
Carinina plecta Kajihara, 2006
Carinina plecta Kajihara, 2006: 5–16, figs. 3–10; sandy to muddy tidal flat, 34°41′04″N, 137°35′59″E, Ikarise, Hamanako Lake, Shizuoka Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-3123, 31 July 2003, female; serial transverse (6 μm thick) and longitudinal (10 μm thick) sections of a fragment containing the head; total 116 slides.
Genus Tubulanus Renier, 1804
Tubulanus Renier, 1804: 20.
Carinella Johnston, 1833: 232; synonymized by Bürger (1904).
TYPE SPECIES: Tubulanus polymorphus Renier, 1804 by monotypic designation.
Tubulanus capistratus (Coe, 1901)
Tubulanus capistratus: Coe, 1944: 27, “One specimen nearly a meter in length was collected by the Albatross in 1906 near Hakodate, Japan.” Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 16, 30, 37, 42.
NOTE: Originally described as Carinella capistrata by Coe (1901: 16) from Orca and Virgin Bay in Prince William Sound, Alaska; transferred to the genus Tubulanus by Coe (1940: 255). Apart from the record from Japan, the species is known to be distributed along the Pacific coast of North America (Gibson, 1995: 316).
Tubulanus ezoensis Yamaoka, 1940 [Japanese name: ezo-himomushi]
Tubulanus ezoensis Yamaoka, 1940a: 212–215, pl. XIV, figs. 3, 4, text figs. 3, 4; lower intertidal under stones, Daikokujima, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Okuda, 1947: 1474, fig. 4158. Iwata, 1954a: 6. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 64. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 390; figs. a–c. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 16, 30, 37, 42.
NOTE: Tubulanus ezoensis has long been known only by Yamaoka's (1940) original description (Iwata, 1954a). Although the type material appears to have been lost (see “Brief History...”), some additional specimens referable to T. ezoensis were recently collected from the type locality (Kajihara, pers. obs.).
Tubulanus lucidus Iwata, 1952
Tubulanus lucidus Iwata, 1952: 126–128, figs. 1, 6; lower intertidal under stones, Fukue Island, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 16, 30, 37.
NOTE: Sundberg and Hylbom's (1994) cladistic analysis based on morphological characters indicates that this species is the sister taxon to hubrechtids, appearing in a clade which is different from that containing other Tubulanus, including the type species. The generic placement of this taxon thus needs reassessment.
Tubulanus punctatus (Takakura, 1898) [Japanese name: kurige-himomushi or kugi-himomushi]
Carinella punctata Takakura, 1898: 117–118, fig. 3; sublittoral from 2–3 fathoms depth, Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Tubulanus punctatus: Kaburaki, 1927: 1662, fig. 3180. Yamaoka, 1940a: 208–212, pl. XIV, figs. 1, 2, text figs. 1, 2; from lower intertidal under stones and in rock crevices to sublittoral among mud, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Ochiishi, Nemuro, Abashiri, Usu and Muroran). Kaburaki, 1947: 1474, fig. 4157. Iwata, 1954a: 5; lower intertidal under stones, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Muroran, Oshoro, Rishiri Island and Monbetsu). Iwata, 1954b: 34; habitat not recorded, northern coast near the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Wakayama Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 64. Utinomi, 1956: 31; pl. 16, fig. 1. Iwata, 1960a: 96, fig. 2. Iwata, 1960b: 19–25, figs. 62–91; intertidal, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 1. Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 1. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.1. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 201. Iwata, 1965b: 390, one figure. Shiino, 1969: 94, fig. 9-3A. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 1. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Kito, 1975: 149; among the holdfasts of Sargassum confusum, Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 14; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Iwata, 1983: 181, 182, figs. 8-5g, h, i, 8-13b. Hieda and Takahashi, 1986: 41, with two color photographs of a specimen taken in Yakumo, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Inaba, 1988: 225; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, found rarely in the Inland Sea of Seto. Miyazawa et al., 1988: 867–874; intertidal, habitat unknown, Hiroshima Prefecture (Iwashijima and Mukaishima), Yugeshima, Ehime Prefecture, identified by Dr. T. Hoshino, Mukaishima Marine Biological Station, Hiroshima University. Iwata, 1992: 196, pl. 44-1, fig. 7-2B. Iwata, 1997: 53 (with a color photograph take in life by Fumio Iwata), 55. Shimomura et al., 2001: 46; dredged sublittorally from two sites in Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture; 39°21′01″N, 141°58′31″E, 58.7 m depth, mixture of sand and shell debris; 39°20′43″N, 141°57′43″E, 49.0 m depth, muddy sand. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 16, 30, 37, 42.
NOTE: Apart from the records from Japanese waters, Tubulanus punctatus is also known from Posjet Bay (Peter the Great Bay) (Korotkevitsch, 1971), Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands and Kamchatka Penninsula (Korotkevitsch, 1982), Vostok Bay (Kulikova, 1988), and Shandon Province (Qingdao, Huangdao, and Jiaonan), China (Yin et al., 1988).
Tubulanus roretzi Senz, 1997
Tubulanus roretzi Senz, 1997a: 424–430, figs. 1-4; locality and habitat unknown.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, NHMW-EV 3565/1886; paratype, NHMW-EV 3566–3573.
NOTE: The material was collected by Dr. Albrecht von Roretz during his stay in Japan from 1874–1882.
Class PILIDIOPHORA Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003
Family HUBRECHTELLIDAE Chernyshev, 2003
Genus Hubrechtella Bergendal, 1902
Hubrechtella Bergendal, 1902: 9.
Coeia Takakura, 1922: 419; synonymized by Kajihara (2006).
TYPE SPECIES: Hubrechtella dubia Bergendal, 1902, by monotypic designation.
Hubrechtella ijimai (Takakura, 1922) [Japanese name: îjima-himomushi]
Coeia ijimai Takakura, 1922: 419–422, two figs.; among sandy gravel on beach, Enoura Bay, Shizuoka Prefecture and Tateyama Bay, Chiba Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 27, 34.
Coia [sic] ijimai: Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 3. Iwata, 1965a: 201. Iwata, 1965b: 391, figs. 6a, b; under stones on sandy beach in Asamushi, Aomori Prefecture, Onagawa, Miyagi Prefecture, Usa, Kôchi Prefecture, and Fukue, Nagasaki Prefecture. Tsuchiya, 1979: 82; intertidal, Hadakajima Island, Asamushi Aomori Prefecture. Iwata, 1992: 197, fig. 7-3B.
Hubrechtella ijimai: Kajihara, 2006: 28–37, figs. 15–19; sandy to muddy tidal flat, 34°41′04″N, 137°35′59″E, Ikarise, Hamanako Lake, Shizuoka Prefecture.
Hubrechtella kimuraorum Kajihara, 2006
Hubrechtella kimuraorum Kajihara, 2000: 37–43, figs. 20–23; sandy to muddy tidal flat, 34°41′04″N, 137°35′59″E, Ikarise, Hamanako Lake, Shizuoka Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-3127, male, 1 August 2003, 72 slides, 6-μm serial transverse sections of the body except in the middle portion.
Genus Tetramys Iwata, 1957
Tetramys Iwata, 1957a: 2.
TYPE SPECIES: Tetramys ramicerebrus Iwata, 1957 by monotypic designation.
NOTE: Cladistic analyses by Sundberg and Hylbom (1994) and Sundberg et al. (2003) based on morphological characters indicate that the genus appears to be synonymous with Hubrechtella.
Tetramys ramicerebrus Iwata, 1957 [Japanese name: miura-himomushi]
Tetramys ramicerebrum [sic] Iwata, 1957a: 3–5, pl. I, fig.1, pl. II, figs. 1–6; dredged sublittorally from 20 m depth on 9 February 1955 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, sediment type not recorded, Higashiône, Sagami Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1965a: 201. Iwata, 1965b: 391, figs. a–d.
Tetramys ramicerebrus: Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 16, 29, 41.
Family LINEIDAE McIntosh, 1874
Genus Cerebratulus Renier, 1804
Cerebratulus Renier, 1804: 21.
Meckelia Leuckart, 1828: 17; synonymized by Hubrecht (1879) (in part).
TYPE SPECIES: Cerebratulus marginatus by subsequent designation of Gibson (1995).
Cerebratulus albocirculus Iwata, 1957
Cerebratulus albocirculus Iwata, 1957a: 17–18, pl. I, fig. 7, pl. V, figs. 6, 7; “Mosaki at Kamezyo,” dredged sublittorally from 10 m depth on 23 July 1956 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 26, 38.
NOTE: The place indicated by the name “Mosaki at Kamezyo” in Iwata's (1957a) original description is uncertain. One possible candidate in Sagami Bay is “Kamegishô,” a bank located at approximately 139°35′N, 35°12′E.
Cerebratulus carnosus Takakura, 1898
Cerebratulus L.C. arnosus [sic] Takakura, 1898: 426, fig. 23; mud, Misaki Harbour and Koajiro Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Cerebratulus arnosus: Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 26, 33. NOTE: The abbreviation “L.C.,” most probably denoting “lower-case letters,” was mistakenly inserted between the generic and specific names in the original publication, with the initial “c” dropped from “carnosus” (=Latin, meaning “fleshy”), which referrs to the body coloration of the species treated in the original description. The original spelling arnosus is incorrect, due to a printer's error, according to Article 32.5 of the Code (ICZN, 1999) (Crandall, pers. comm.).
Cerebratulus communis Takakura, 1898 [Japanese name: nami-himomushi]
Cerebratulus L.C. ommunis [sic] Takakura, 1898: 425, fig. 22 (originally numbered as fig. 20); intertidal in sandy mud, Misaki Harbour, Koajiro Bay, Bishamon Bay, and Matsuwa Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Cerebratulus communis: Kaburaki, 1927: 1666, fig. 3189. Kaburaki, 1947: 1471, fig. 4149. Iwata, 1952: 140–141, fig. 5; lower intertidal among sandy mud, Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 31, pl. 16, fig. 6. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 6; Asamushi, Aomori Prefecture. Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 6. Inaba, 1963: 228; lower intertidal on sandy to muddy shores or under stones on gravelly to rocky shore, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Kikuchi, 1968: 167; among Zostera marina, Tomioka Bay, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 6. Inaba, 1988: 225; lower intertidal on sandy to muddy shores or under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 24, 26, 33.
Cerebratulus comunis [sic]: Kaburaki and Iwata, 1965: 395, with one figure.
NOTE: As in the case with Cerebratulus arnosus, a nomenclatural consideration is required as to the correct spelling of the species name. The species has been also recorded from Alaid Island, northern Kurile Islands (Takakura, 1933).
Cerebratulus fasciatus Stimpson, 1857
Cerebratulus fasciatus Stimpson, 1857: 161; obtained sublittorally from sandy to stony bottoms of about 7.4 m depth, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Originally recorded as “Apud oras insulae ‘Jesso‘ Japoniae Borealis; in fundo arenoso-limoso profunditatis 4 orgyiarum” (near the region of Hokkaidô Island, northern Japan; in a bottom of muddy sand at a depth of 7.4 m). Iwata, 1954a: 14. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 67. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 26, 38.
Cerebratulus formosus Iwata, 1957
Cerebratulus formosus Iwata, 1957a: 15–17, pl. I, fig. 4, pl, V, figs. 1–5; dredged sublittorally from 100 m depth on 13 December 1952 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Nakafukari at Hayama, Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 26, 38.
Cerebratulus longiceps Coe, 1901
Cerebratulus longiceps: Coe, 1944: 29, obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries Steamer Albatross, 250 m depth, off Ôshima, the Metropolis of Tôkyô. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 27, 38.
NOTE: Cerebratulus longiceps was originally described from Yakutat, Alaska, USA, by Coe (1901: 77). The species is so far only known from Coe's (1901, 1944) records.
Cerebratulus macroren Hubrecht, 1887
Cerebratulus macroren Hubrecht, 1887: 46–47, pl. I, figs. 13, 14, 18, 19, pl. X, figs. 8, 9, pl. XI, fig. 11, pl. XII, figs. 1, 2, 7, 8, pl. XIII, figs. 7–9, pl. XIV, figs. 7, 8, 11, pl. XV, figs. 2, 3, 19, text fig. 4; sublittoral from 345 fathoms (about 640 m) depth on green mud, collected on 12 May 1875 by H.M.S. Challenger, 35°11′00″N, 139°28′00″E, Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture.
Cerebratulus marginatus Renier, 1804 [Japanese name: orochi-himomushi]
Cerebratulus marginatus: Yamaoka, 1940a: 222–224, pl. XV, figs. 6–8, text fig. 9; lower intertidal or sublittoral in soft mud or among fine sand under stones, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Coe, 1944: 29. Okuda, 1947: 1472, fig. 4150. Iwata, 1954a: 14; sublittoral among soft mud, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Kushiro and Nemuro); sublittoral among soft mud, Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1954b: 37; sublittoral, obtained by trawling off the coast of the Kii Peninsula, Wakayama Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 66. Iwata 1957a: 11–12, pl. I, fig. 6; dredged sublittorally from 200–280 m depth on 5 February 1955 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, “Southern Maruyamadashi at Aamadaiba” [sic], Sagami Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 5. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 201. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.5. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 385, figs. a, b. Shiino, 1969: 94, fig. 9–3B-D. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Iwata, 1992: 198, fig. 7–2D. Iwata, 1997: 55. Shimomura et al., 2001: 46; obtained from a sediment of mixed sand, mud, and shell debris at a depth of 64 m, 39°23.363′N, 141°58.971′E, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 24, 27, 38.
NOTE: Cerebratulus marginatus Renier, 1804 was originally described from the Adriatic Sea, Italy (presumably Padua). Apart from the records in Japanese waters, the species is also reported from the Pacific coast of North America (Alaska to California), the western North Atlantic (Greenland, Labrador, and Cape Cod southwards under the offshore Arctic current), the Arctic (King Charles Land, Bremer Sound, Hinlopen Strait, Spitzbergen), Europe (Norway, the British Isles, the Mediterranean), and south to Madeira (Gibson, 1995: 340).
Cerebratulus montgomeryi Coe, 1901
Cerebratulus montgomeryi: Coe, 1944: 29; obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries Steamer Albatross, 600 m depth, off Hokkaidô. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 24, 27, 34, 38.
NOTE: Originally described from Alaska by Coe (1901: 80), Cerebratulus montgomeryi is distributed along Pacific coast of North America, the Aleutian Islands, Bering Sea, coast of Siberia, Japan Sea coasts of Russia, and Japan (Kulikova, 1988; Gibson, 1995: 341).
Cerebratulus penniger Iwata, 1957
Cerebratulus penniger Iwata, 1957a: 13–14, pl. I, fig. 3, pl. IV, figs. 4–6; dredged sublittorally from 380 m depth on 28 September 1953 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Nakafukari at Hayama, Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 27, 38.
Cerebratulus subacutus (Stimpson, 1857)
Meckelia subacuta Stimpson, 1857: 161; intertidal in mud, Naha, Okinawa Prefecture. Originally recorded as “In portu ‘Napa’ insulae ‘Loo Choo;’ littoralis in limo”; transferred to Baseodiscus by Bürger (1904: 120).
Cerebratulus subacutus: Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 30, 34.
Cerebratulus superniger Iwata, 1957
Cerebratulus superniger Iwata, 1957a: 14–15, pl. I, fig. 5, pl. IV, figs. 7, 8; collected by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa from a depth of 10 m on 10 January 1930, “Ithishiki at Hayama” [sic], off Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 27, 39.
Cerebratulus zebra Punnett and Cooper, 1909
Cerebratulus zebra: Iwata, 1957a: 12–13; dredged sublittorally from 410 m depth on 16 July 1940 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, “Aamadaiba” [sic], Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 27, 39.
NOTE: Cerebratulus zebra was originally described from Sri Lanka (Punnett and Cooper, 1909: 11). The species is currently known only from the two localities, Sri Lanka and Japan.
Genus Diplopleura Stimpson, 1857
Diplopleura Stimpson, 1857: 162.
Langia Hubrecht, 1879: 220; synonymized by Verrill (1895: 528).
TYPE SPECIES: Diplopleura japonica Stimpson, 1857 by monotypic designation.
NOTE: The genus Diplopleura, currently containing five nominal species, was established only on the basis of external characters, in which the lateral margins of the body are dorsally curled up.
Diplopleura japonica Stimpson, 1857 [Japanese name: hida-himomushi]
Diplopleura japonica Stimpson, 1857: 162; shallow sublittoral in sandy bottom of 5 orgyia (=5 fathoms=9.3 m) depth, Kagoshima Bay, Kagoshima Prefecture. Iwata, 1965a: 201. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 39.
NOTE: Diplopleura japonica has not been reported since its original description. Stimpson's specimen was light yellowish chestnut in color, measured 1.5 “pollex” (=1.5 inch=3.8 cm) in length and 0.12 “pollex” (=0.12 inch=0.3 cm) in width.
Genus Euborlasia Vaillant, 1890
Euborlasia Vaillant, 1890: 616.
TYPE SPECIES: Borlasia elizabethae McIntosh, 1874 by monotypic designation.
Euborlasia gotoensis Iwata, 1952 [Japanese name: gotô-himomushi]
Euborlasia gotoensis Iwata, 1952: 133–134, figs. 3, 9, 10; lower intertidal under stones, Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 8. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 201. Iwata, 1965b: 392, figs. a–c. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Iwata, 1992: 198, pl. 44–3. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 34.
Euborlasia proteres Iwata, 1957
Euborlasia proteres Iwata, 1957a: 8–9, pl. I, fig. 2, pl. IV, figs. 1–3; dredged sublittorally from 380 m depth on 28 September 1953 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Nakafukari at Hayama, Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 39.
Genus Hinumanemertes Iwata, 1970
Hinumanemertes Iwata, 1970a: 134.
TYPE SPECIES: Hinumanemertes kikuchii Iwata, 1970 by original designation.
Hinumanemertes kikuchii Iwata, 1970 [Japanese name: hinuma-himomushi]
Hinumanemertes kikuchii Iwata, 1970a: 136–142, fig. 1A–C, pl. 1, figs. 1–8, pl. 2, figs. 9–17; obtained sublittorally in mud from a brackish-water lake, Lake Hinuma, Ibaraki Prefecture. Iwata, 1970b: 128. Iwata, 1973: 264. Iwata, 1992: 198, fig. 7–3E. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 43.
Genus Iwatanemertes Gibson, 1990
Iwatanemertes Gibson, 1990a: 75.
TYPE SPECIES: Meckelia piperata Stimpson, 1855 by original designation.
Iwatanemertes piperata (Stimpson, 1855) [Japanese name: ryûkyû-himomushi]
Meckelia piperata Stimpson, 1855: 381; habitat not recorded, Kikaishima, Kagoshima Prefecture.
Lineus piperata [sic]: Takakura, 1898: 186–187, fig. 9; intertidal among algae, Enoshima and Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Lineus piperatus: Stimpson, 1857: 160; sublittoral between stones and among algae, Kikaishima, Kagoshima Prefecture; originally recorded as “In portu insulae ‘Kikaishima’ Japoniae Australis; sublittoralis inter lapillus et algas.” Yamaoka, 1940b: 13–15, figs. 1, 2; habitat not recorded, Shitaru, Minami-Izu, Shizuoka Prefecture; habitat not recorded, Naha, Okinawa Island, Okinawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1954b: 34; intertidal under stones, Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 1; Aikawa, Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Iwata, 1965b: 394, with one figure.
Iwatanemertes piperata: Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 31, 34, 39.
NOTE: Transferred to Iwatanemertes by Gibson (1990a: 75), based upon a study of material collected in Hong Kong. Apart from the records from Japanese waters, the species is also known from Hong Kong (Gibson, 1990a) and the Taiwan Straits (Sun, 1995).
Genus Lineus Soweby, 1806
Lineus Sowerby, 1806: 15.
Heterolineus Friedrich, 1935a: 310; synonymized by Corrêa (1963: 43).
TYPE SPECIES: Ascaris longissima Gunnerus, 1770 by monotypic designation.
Lineus alborostratus Takakura, 1898 [Japanese name: takakura-himomushi]
Lineus alborostratus Takakura, 1898: 332, fig. 12; habitat not recorded, Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture. Yamaoka, 1940a: 220–222, pl. XV, figs. 1–5, text fig. 8; lower intertidal under stones, Akkeshi and Ochiishi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1951: 136–137, figs. 2, 3c; intertidal under stones, Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture. Iwata, 1952: 138–139; lower intertidal under stones, Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Iwata, 1954a: 12; lower intertidal under stones, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Nemuro, Hiroo, Muroran, Monbetsu and Rishiri Island). Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 66. Iwata, 1957c: 102. Iwata, 1960b: 26–27, figs. 92–96; intertidal, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 9. Inaba, 1963: 227; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral under stones on rocky to gravelly shores, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965b: 393, figs. a–c. Iwata, 1983: 182. Inaba, 1988: 225; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral under stones on rocky to gravelly shores, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Iwata, 1992: 198, pl. 44–6. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 31, 34, 39.
NOTE: Apart from the records from Japanese waters, Lineus alborostratus is also known from Vostok Bay, Russia (Kulikova, 1988) and Shandong Province (Qingdao and Yantai), China (Yin et al., 1988). A similar-looking species, Lineus hiatti Coe, 1947, is known from Hawaii; the latter can be distinguished from L. alborostratus by the head having less distinct anterior white or colorless margins (Coe, 1947: 104).
Lineus albovittatus (Stimpson, 1855)
Meckelia albovittata [sic] Stimpson, 1855: 382; habitat not recorded, Okinawa Prefecture; originally recorded as “Loo Choo.”
Cerebratulus albovittatus: Stimpson 1857: 160; intertidal among algae and in rock crevices, Okinawa Prefecture. Non Cerebratulus albovittatus: Bürger, 1890: 11, pl.1, fig. 1, pl. 2, figs. 1–8, pl. 8, figs. 153–154 (from Ambon, Indonesia).
Lineus albovittatus: Iwata, 1954c: 27–29, figs. 1A, 2; habitat not recorded, Nakanoshima, Tokara Islands, Kagoshima Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 34, 39. Non Lineus albovittatus [sic]: Punnett, 1900: 578, pl. LXI, figs. 46–47 (from Lifou, New Caledonia, South Pacific); nec Lineus albovittatus: Punnett and Cooper, 1909: 7, 14, pl. 1, fig. 10, pl. 2, fig. 14 (from Salomon, Indian Ocean).
NOTE: Two forms have been known by the specific name of either albovittatus or albovittatus. These differ in the shape of the white line across the dorsal surface of the head. The transverse line in one form, reported from Japanese waters, is straight (Stimpson, 1855, 1857; Iwata, 1954c), while it is W-shaped in the other (Bürger, 1890; Punnett, 1900; Punnett and Cooper, 1909). The latter was synonymized with Lineus tricuspidatus (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833) by Gibson (1981: 206) and later transferred to Notospermus by Riser (1991: 435), and is now known as Notospermus tricuspidatus, a species that has not been reported from Japanese waters.
Lineus bipunctatus Takakura, 1898
Lineus bipunctatus Takakura, 1898: 335–336, fig. 18: Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture; collected sublittorally among thecatid hydroids from 2–3 fathoms depth. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus cancelli Iwata, 1954
Lineus cancelli Iwata, 1954b: 34–35, fig. 1; intertidal under stones, Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus caputornatus Takakura, 1898
Lineus caputornatus Takakura, 1898: 334–335, fig.15; obtained sublittorally among thecate hydroids from 2–3 fathoms depth, Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus fulvus Iwata, 1954
Lineus fulvus Iwata, 1954a: 13, fig. 2C; intertidal among laminarian holdfasts, Rishiri Island, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 66, fig. 17–3. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 18, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus fuscoviridis Takakura, 1898 [Japanese name: midori-himomushi or midori-hera-himomushi]
Lineus fuscoviridis Takakura, 1898: 332–333, fig. 13; intertidal under stones on muddy sand, sublittoral between rock crevices from 2–3 fathoms depth, Misaki and Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture and Sunosaki, Tateyama, Chiba Prefecture. Kaburaki, 1927: 1665, fig. 3186. Ohuye, 1942: 187–191, figs. 1–3. Kaburaki, 1947: 1470, fig. 4146. Ohuye, 1950: 22. Iwata, 1952: 134–136; lower intertidal under stones, Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture. Iwata, 1954b: 36–37; habitat not recorded, Kada, Wakayama Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 31, pl. 16, fig. 5. Iwata, 1957a: 10–11; habitat not recorded, obtained by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa on 5 June 1928, Koajiro at Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 11. Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 5. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.6. Inaba, 1963: 228; sandy to muddy sediment or under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto; a specimen collected 21 May 1936 at Hakanjima, Hiroshima Prefecture, is deposited in Mukaishima Marine Biological Station, Hiroshima University, under registration number 70–1. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 201. Kaburaki and Iwata, 1965: 393, with one figure. Shiino, 1969: 93. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 5. Saito and Suzuki, 1974: 38; intertidal, Niisaki Beach, Kanagawa Prefecture; identified by Dr. Iwata. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Ochi, 1979: 640. Inaba, 1988: 225; sandy to muddy sediment or under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Miyazawa et al. 1988: 867–874; intertidal, Iwashijima and Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture; intertidal, Yugeshima, Ehime Prefecture; identified by Dr. T. Hoshino, Mukaishima Marine Biological Station, Hiroshima University. Iwata, 1992: 198, pl. 44–7. Uchida, 1994: 88, with a color photograph taken in life by Mr. Isamu Soyama in Ôsezaki, Shizuoka Prefecture. Iwata, 1997: 55. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 18, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus fuscoviridus [sic]: Kikuchi, 1968: 167; among Zostera marina, Tomioka Bay, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture.
Lineus nigrofuscus (Stimpson, 1857)
Cerebratulus nigrofuscus Stimpson, 1857: 161; intertidal between stones, Amamiôshima, Kagoshima Prefecture. Originally reported as “Ad insulam ‘Ousima’ Japoniae Australis; littoralis inter lapillus”; transferred to Lineus by Bürger (1904: 102). Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus nigrostriatus Iwata, 1954
Lineus nigrostriatus Iwata, 1954c: 30, fig. 1B; habitat not recorded, Nakanoshima, Tokara Islands, Kagoshima Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 18, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus nipponensis Senz, 2001
Lineus nipponensis Senz, 2001: 5–13, figs. 1–9; habitat and locality unknown.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, NHMW-EV 17026/3990; para-type, NHMW-EV 17027/3991.
NOTE: The material was collected by Dr. Albrecht von Roretz during his stay in Japan from 1874–1882.
Lineus spatiosus Iwata, 1954
Lineus spatiosus Iwata, 1954a: 11–12, fig. 2B; lower intertidal under stones, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 65, fig. 17–2. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 18, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus subcingulatus Takakura, 1898 [Japanese name: koajiro-himomushi]
Lineus subcingulatus Takakura, 1898: 335, fig. 16; intertidal among Sargassum thunbergii, Koajiro Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture. Kaburaki, 1927: 1665, fig. 3187. Kaburaki, 1947: 1471, fig. 4147. Inaba, 1963: 228; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, commonly occurring on algae, or on gravelly to rocky shores, the Inland Sea of Seto. Kaburaki and Iwata, 1965: 394. Inaba, 1988: 225; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, commonly occurring on algae, or on gravelly to rocky shores, the Inland Sea of Seto. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 18, 27, 34, 39.
Lineus torquatus Coe, 1901
[Japanese name: kasuri-himomushi or kasuri-hera-himomushi] Lineus torquatus: Yamaoka, 1940a: 218–220, pl. XIV, figs. 9–14, text fig. 7; Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Ochiishi, and Nemuro), lower intertidal under stones. Okuda, 1947: 1471, fig. 4148 (1–3). Iwata, 1954a: 12; lower intertidal under stones or among laminarian holdfasts, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Nemuro and Hiroo). Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 66. Utinomi, 1956: 31, pl. 16, fig. 4. Iwata 1957b: 54–57, figs. 1–10; intertidal under stones, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1957c: 102, figs. 5.1a–c, 5.2. Iwata, 1960b: 26. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 13. Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 4. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 394, figs. a–c. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 4. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Iwata, 1983: 182, 183, 187, 189, figs. 8-1, 8–2, 8–6. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 18, 27, 35, 39.
NOTE: Originally reported from Alaska (Coe, 1901: 66); also known to occur in San Francisco Bay, USA (Corrêa, 1964: 528) and Santa Maria Basin, California, USA (Blake, 1993: 118), on the coasts around northern China (Sun and Pan, 1994: 328), and the Japan Sea coast of Russia (Korotkevitsch, 1955, 1971; Kulikova, 1988). Manchenko and Kulikova (1996a) demonstrated on the basis of allozyme analyses that the species is a mixture of at least two cryptic species, which have been recognized since the original description by Coe (1901) as brown and reddish color morphs. A nomenclatural procedure, such as neotypification, may be required in the future to make it clear to which taxon the name torquatus will be applied. Even if some syntypes were extant, designating a lectotype would not solve the problem, for the body color might have been changed or not preserved by fixation.
Genus Micrura Ehrenberg, 1831
Micrura Ehrenberg, 1831: 57.
TYPE SPECIES: Micrura fasciolata Ehrenberg, 1831, by monotypic designation.
Micrura akkeshiensis Yamaoka, 1940 [Japanese name: akkeshi-himomushi]
Micrura akkeshiensis Yamaoka, 1940a: 227–228, pl. XV, figs. 11, 12, pl. XVI, fig. 1, text fig. 11; upper intertidal under stones on sandy beaches, Akkeshi and Abashiri, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Okuda, 1947: 1473, fig. 4153. Iwata, 1954a: 14–15; intertidal under stones, Akkeshi and Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 67. Iwata, 1957c: 106. Iwata, 1958: 104–127, figs. 1–60; in July 1955, intertidal, Daikokujima Island, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1960a: 96, figs. 3, 4. Iwata, 1960b: 27. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 2. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.4. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 201. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 395, figs. a, b. Iwata, 1983: 181, 182, 185, 191, figs. 8–12. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Apart from the records from Hokkaido, Micrura akkeshiensis is also known from Vostok Bay, Russia (Kulikova, 1988).
Micrura alaskensis Coe, 1901
Micrura alaskensis: Yamaoka, 1940a: 225–226, pl. XV, figs. 9, 10, text fig. 10; intertidal under stones on beaches, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Coe, 1944: 29. Iwata, 1954a: 14; lower intertidal under stones, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 67. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Originally described from Alaska (at New Metlakahtla on Annette Island, Glacier Bay, Sitka, Yakutat, and at Orca and Virgin Bay in Prince William Sound) by Coe (1901: 71), Micrura alaskensis is also reported from San Pedro and Monterey Bay, California, USA (Coe, 1904: 118), British Columbia, Canada (Coe, 1940: 271), and Ensenada, Mexico (Coe, 1940: 271); the record from Santa Maria Basin, California, USA (Blake, 1993: 119), based on fixed fragments of bodies collected from depths of 297 m and 591 m, might represent different species.
Micrura bella (Stimpson, 1857) [Japanese name: kuchibeni-himomushi]
Cerebratulus bellus Stimpson, 1857: 161; obtained from an empty shell from a muddy bottom, 11 m depth, Hokkaidô Prefecture; originally reported as “Prope oras insulae ‘Jesso;’ in conchis desertis e fundo limoso profunditatis sex orgyiarum.”
Micrura festiva Takakura, 1898: 336, fig. 20; sublittoral 2–3 fathoms (=3.7–5.6 m) depth, Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture. Kaburaki, 1927: 1666, fig. 3188. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 35, 40.
Micrura bella: Yamaoka, 1940a: 230–232, pl. XV, figs. 13–15; on floating rotten wood perforated by the shipworm Teredo hibicola, Usu, Hokkaidô Prefecture; habitat not recorded, Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture; habitat not recorded, Kushimoto, Wakayama Prefecture. Okuda, 1947: 1472, fig. 4151. Iwata, 1954a: 14; lower intertidal under stones or among holdfasts of seaweeds, Muroran and Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture, Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture, and Kushimoto, Wakayama Prefecture. Iwata, 1954b: 37; intertidal under stones, Yuzaki, Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 67. Utinomi, 1956: 32, pl. 16, fig. 10. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 3; habitat not recorded, Usa, Kôchi Prefecture and Aikawa, Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Utinomi, 1960: 32, pl. 16, fig. 10. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 395, figs. a, b. Utinomi, 1969: 32, pl. 16, fig. 10. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Micrura bella possesses a striking body color pattern, which is an off-white background with a deep vermilion tip of the head and a longitudinal dorsal band composed of broad purple rectangles separated by narrow spaces. There are at least three different names for similar-looking forms: Lineus striatus Griffin, 1898, Micrura impressa Stimpson, 1857, and Micrura verrilli Coe, 1901. Crandall et al. (2002) pointed out that the difference among these forms is whether or not the head marking encircles the tip. Crandall et al. (2002) suggested that the head marking is complete in the western-Pacific forms, while it is restricted to the dorsal half in the eastern-Pacific forms. Future assessment will be required to delineate these forms for the proper application of their names.
Micrura dorsovittata Takakura, 1898
Micrura dorsovittata Takakura, 1898: 337, fig. 21; habitat not recorded, Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Micrura dorsovittata is so far known only by its original description. It resembles Micrura kulikovae Chernyshev, 1992, a new name given to a form identified as Micrura bella by Kulikova and Kutishchev (1984), in which the color of the dorsal band is brownish.
Micrura japonica Iwata, 1952 [Japanese name: kuro-himomushi]
Micrura japonica Iwata, 1952: 139–140, figs. 4, 11, 12; lower intertidal under stones on sandy beaches, Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture; upper intertidal under stones in tide pools on a rocky shore, Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture; habitat not recorded, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 32, pl. 16, fig. 9. Iwata, 1957a: 18–19; collected intertidally on 18 January 1930 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Samejima at Hayama, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 169; pl. 84, fig. 4; habitat not recorded, Sakurajima, Kagoshima Prefecture; habitat not recorded, Aikawa, Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Utinomi, 1960: 32, pl. 16, fig. 9. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.3. Iwata, 1965b: 396, figs. a, b. Utinomi, 1969: 32, pl. 16, fig. 9. Saito and Suzuki, 1974: 38; intertidal, Niisaki Beach, Kanagawa Prefecture; identified by Dr. Iwata. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Iwata, 1992: 198–199, fig. 7–3F. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: The distinction between Micrura japonica Iwata, 1952 and Micrura formosana Yamaoka, 1939 will require future verification; the latter species, described from the northeastern coast of Taiwan, differs from the former by having a rhynchocoel diverticulum protruding ventrally into the lumen of the foregut, a character state that can be interpreted as an artifact induced during fixation. Yamaoka's (1939) illustration of the external appearance of the preserved specimen shows strong shrinkage on the surface of the body, which suggests that the specimen was not, or not adequately, anaesthetized before fixation. This would further argue for conspecificity of these two nominal species, reinforced by the close proximity of their localities. Furthermore, M. japonica and M. formosana might be synonymous with Cerebratulus niger (Stimpson, 1855), described from Hong Kong, which is similar in having a truncated anterior end, lateral cephalic slits extending back to the mouth region, black body coloration, and white margins around the mouth.
Micrura magna Yamaoka, 1940
Micrura magna Yamaoka, 1940a: 227–228, pl. XVI, figs. 2–4; lower intertidal under stones, Daikokujima, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1954a: 14. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 67. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Besides its original description, Micrura magna is also known from Vostok Bay, Russia (Kulikova, 1988).
Micrura multinotara Iwata, 1957
Micrura multinotarum [sic] Iwata, 1957a: 19–20, pl. I, fig. 8, pl. V, figs. 8, 9; dredged from 30–40 m depth on 20 January 1949 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Tateishi at Ogashima, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Micrura multinotara: Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 18, 28, 40.
Genus Nipponomicrura Chernyshev, 1995
Nipponomicrura Chernyshev, 1995: 15.
TYPE SPECIES: Micrura uchidai Yamaoka, 1940, by original designation.
Nipponomicrura uchidai (Yamaoka, 1940) [Japanese name: uchida-himomushi]
Micrura uchidai Yamaoka, 1940a: 232–234, pl. XVI, figs. 5–7, text fig. 12; lower intertidal under stones, Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Okuda, 1947: 1472, fig. 4152 (1–3). Iwata, 1954a: 14. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 67. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 396, figs. a–c.
Nipponomicrura uchidai: Chernyshev, 1995: 15. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 18, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Besides the original record from Muroran, Nipponomicrura uchidai is also known from Vostok Bay, Russia (Kulikova, 1988).
Genus Notospermus Huschke, 1830
Notospermus Huschke, 1830: 682.
TYPE SPECIES: Notospermus drepanensis Huschke, 1830 (from Sicilia, Italy; now regarded as a junior synonym of Polia geniculata Delle Chiaje, 1828) by monotypic designation.
Notospermus geniculatus (Delle Chiaje, 1828) [Japanese name: misaki-himomushi or kurohera-himomushi]
Lineus mitellatus Takakura, 1898: 333–334, fig. 14; intertidal under stones on muddy sand, sublittoral in rock crevices from 2–3 fathoms depth, Misaki and Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture and Sunosaki, Tateyama, Chiba Prefecture. Iwata, 1952: 136–137, fig. 13; lower intertidal under stones, Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture.
Lineus geniculatus: Iwata, 1954b: 35–36; intertidal under stones, Kushimoto and Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 31, pl. 16, fig. 3. Iwata, 1957a: 9–10; habitat not recorded, collected by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa on 16 July, 1939 Najima at Hayama, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 10. Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 3. Inaba, 1963: 228; sandy to muddy sediment or under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto; a specimen collected on 20 June 1963 at Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture, is deposited in Mukaishima Marine Biological Station, Hiroshima University, under registration number 70–2. Iwata, 1965b: 393, figs. a–c. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 3. Saito and Suzuki, 1974: 38; intertidal, Niisaki Beach, Kanagawa Prefecture; identified by Dr. Iwata. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Inaba, 1988: 225; sandy to muddy sediment or under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Iwata, 1992: 198, pl. 44–4, 5. Uchida, 1994: 88–89, with a color photograph taken in life by Mr. Isamu Soyama at Ôsezaki, Shizuoka Prefecture.
?Lineus genicalatus [sic]: Iwata, 1997: 53, a color photograph taken in life by Eiichi Kurasawa, possibly depicting a species of the genus Cerebratulus that lost its tail.
Notospermus geniculatus: Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 18, 28, 35, 40. Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003: 408; Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture.
NOTE: Iwata (1954b) synonymized Lineus mitellatus sensu Takakura (1898) and sensu Iwata (1952) with Lineus geniculatus, which was originally described as Polia geniculata by Delle Chiaje (1828: 177) from Naples, Italy. The species has been redescribed as Notospermus geniculatus by Riser (1991: 428–434). Outside Japanese waters it is also known from the Black Sea, Mediterranean (France, Italy, Greece, Malta), Canary Is., Gulf of Guinea (West Africa), Australia, New Zealand, and the western coasts of tropical America (Gulf of California, Panama, and Peru) (Gibson, 1995: 480).
Genus Paralineopsis Iwata, 1993
Paralineopsis Iwata, 1993: 186.
TYPE SPECIES: Paralineopsis taki Iwata, 1993, by original designation.
Paralineopsis taki Iwata, 1993
Zygeupolia littoralis: Iwata, 1951: 135–136; lower intertidal under stones on sand, Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture. Inaba, 1963: 227. Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture.
Zyreupolia littoralis [sic]: Inaba, 1988: 225. Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture.
Paralineopsis taki Iwata, 1993: 186–199, figs. 1–6.
Paralinoepsis taki [sic]: Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 18, 28, 36. NOTE: Iwata (1951) originally identified his material as Zygeupolia littoralis Thompson, 1900 on the basis of its external features. Later he thoroughly redescribed the taxon as a new genus and species (Iwata, 1993).
Genus Uchidana Iwata, 1967
Uchidana Iwata, 1967: 123.
TYPE SPECIES: Uchidana parasita Iwata, 1967 by original designation.
Uchidana parasita Iwata, 1967 [Japanese name: uchida-kisei-himomushi]
Uchidana parasita Iwata, 1967: 124–136, text fig. 1, pl. 1, figs. 1–8, pl. 2, figs. 9–16, pl. 3, figs. 17–24; in the mantle cavity of Mactra sulcataria in muddy sand, mouth of the River Aikawa, Tsu, Mie Prefecture. Iwata, 1970b: 128, 132. Iwata, 1973: 264. Iwata, 1992: 198, fig. 7–3D. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 18, 30, 44.
NOTE: Uchidana parasita is the only heteronemertean species parasitizing bivalves.
Family VALENCINIIDAE Hubrecht, 1879
Genus Baseodiscus Diesing, 1850
Polia Delle Chiaje, 1825: 406; non Polia Ochsenheimer, 1816: 73 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Baseodiscus Diesing, 1850: 243.
Eupolia Hubrecht, 1887: 10; synonymized by Bürger (1904).
TYPE SPECIES: Polia delineata Delle Chiaje, 1825 by monotypic designation.
Baseodiscus curtus (Hubrecht, 1879) [Japanese name: tatejima-himomushi]
Eupolia curta: Takakura, 1898: 185, fig. 7; sublittoral from 2–3 fathoms, Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture; intertidal, Matsuwa Bay, Miura, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Baseodiscus curtus: Kaburaki, 1927: 1664, fig. 3185. Kaburaki, 1947: 1473, fig. 4154. Iwata, 1952: 141–142, fig. 14; lower intertidal under stones, Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 31, pl. 16, fig. 7. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 6. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 201. Iwata, 1965b: 391, one fig. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 7. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 16, 26, 33, 38.
Baseodiscus delineatus var. curtus: Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 7. Saito and Suzuki, 1974: 38; intertidal, Niisaki Beach, Kanagawa Prefecture; identified by Dr. Fumio Iwata.
NOTE: Baseodiscus curtus, originally described as Polia curta Hubrecht, 1879, from Naples, Italy, was transferred to the genus Baseodiscus by Bürger (1904). Baseodiscus curtus was synonymized with B. delinatus by Gibson (1979). However, B. curtus can be distinguished from B. delineatus by lacking stripes on the ventral surface of the body (Hubrecht, 1879: 209). Although these two species have been regarded as conspecific (e.g., Gibson, 1995), they are treated as distinct species in the present paper. These two species appear to occur globally (Gibson, 1995), with virtually completely overlapping ranges of distribution (Coe, 1944).
Baseodiscus delineatus (Delle Chiaje, 1825) [Japanese name: iso-himomushi]
?Eupolia sp. Takakura, 1898: 185, fig. 8; intertidal, Moroiso and Mwatsuwa, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Baseodiscus delineatus: Coe, 1944: 28. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 16, 26, 33, 38.
?Baseodiscus takakurai Gibson, 1995: 305.
NOTE 1: Baseodiscus delineatus was originally described as Polia delineata Delle Chiaje, 1825 from Naples, Italy, then transferred to Baseodiscus by Diesing (1850: 243). The species can be distinguished from B. curtus by its either striped or mottled ventral body surface. The species shows a circumglobal distribution; apart from the records from Japan, Baseodiscus delineatus is also known from the Mediterranean, the Adriatic and Atlantic coasts of Europe, Cape Verde Is., Bermuda, Barbados, southern Florida, USA, Puerto Rico, Gulf of California, Fiji Is., Mariana Is., Java, Torres Straits, Australia (the Great Barrier Reef and southern coast of Western Australia), Mauritius, Zanzibar, Brazil, and Chile (Gibson, 1995: 479).
NOTE 2: Takakura (1898) recorded a form as Eupolia sp. that possessed black mottles on both the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the body. Similar specimens collected on Kakeroma Island (Kagoshima Prefecture) and Ishigaki Island (Okinawa Prefecture) show mottles becoming gradually fused together to form incomplete longitudinal stripes in the middle region of the body (Kajihara, pers. obs.). Takakura's Eupolia sp. is herein tentatively regarded as Baseodiscus delineatus, though future study must confirm this identification. Takakura (1898) did not identify his material to species, mentioning that it resembled Eupolia antillensis Bürger, 1895. Gibson (1995) misinterpreted this as Takakura's (1898) having established a new taxon with the specific name antillensis, and superfluously gave the new name Baseodiscus takakurai for Takakura's (1898) Eupolia sp.
Baseodiscus hemprichii (Ehrenberg, 1831) [Japanese name: sanada-himomushi]
Baseodiscus hemprichi [sic]: Iwata, 1954b: 37; habitat not recorded, Tôshima, Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture. Iwata, 1954c: 30–31; habitat not recorded, Nakanoshima, Tokara Islands, Kagoshima Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 31, pl. 16, fig. 8. Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 8. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 8.
Baseodiscus hemprichii: Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 7. Ooishi, 1964: 193; intertidal among dead reef corals, Ushuku, Amamiôshima, Kagoshima Prefecture. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 392, figs. a, b. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 24, 26, 30, 33, 38.
NOTE: Originally described as Nemertes hemprichii Ehrenberg, 1831 from the Red Sea, subsequently transferred to Baseodiscus by Bürger (1904: 83). Apart from the records from Japanese waters and its type locality, this species is widely known from India, Pakistan, East Africa (off Mozambique and Zanzibar), Maldives, Laccadive Islands, Coetivy Island, Mauritius, Malay Peninsula, Java, Ambon, Taiwan, Australia (Great Barrier Reef), Papua New Guinea, New Britain (Solomon Is.), Loyalty Is., Caroline Is., Wake Is., West Samoa, and Hawaiian Islands (Gibson, 1995: 432–433).
Baseodiscus nipponensis (Hubrecht, 1887)
Eupolia nipponensis Hubrecht, 1887: 14–15, pl. I, figs. 4, 5, 10, pl. VII, figs. 6, 11, 12; dredged from 345 fathoms (about 640 m) depth on green mud, collected on 12 May 1875 by H.M.S. Challenger, 35°11′00″N, 139°28′00″E, Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture; transferred to Baseodiscus by Bürger (1904: 84).
Baseodiscus nipponensis: Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 26, 38.
NOTE: Baseodiscus nipponensis has not been reported since its original description. The species was described from preserved body fragments.
Baseodiscus princeps (Coe, 1901) [Japanese name: arasuka-himomushi]
Baseodiscus curtus: Yamaoka, 1940a: 234–236, pl. XVI, fig. 8–11, text fig.13; lower intertidal between or under stones, Daikokujima, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture; synonymized by Iwata (1954a: 15).
Baseodiscus princeps: Coe, 1944: 28, obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries Steamer Albatross, 340 m depth, south of Hokkaidô Island; 250 m depth, off Ôshima, the Metropolis of Tôkyô; 260 m depth, off Ôsezaki, Izu Peninsula, Shizuoka Prefecture; 135–290 m depth, Sea of Japan. Iwata, 1954a: 15; lower intertidal under stones, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 68. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965b: 392, figs. a–c. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 26, 33, 38.
NOTE: Originally described as Taeniosoma princeps Coe, 1901 from Alaska (Cape Fox, Yakutat, and Orca in Prince William Sound), transferred to Baseodiscus by Coe (1940: 262). Also known from Puget Sound, Washington, USA (Coe, 1944: 28).
Baseodiscus quinquelineatus (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833) [Japanese name: kurosuji-himomushi]
Taeniosoma aequale Stimpson, 1857: 162; intertidal under stones, Amamiôshima, Kagoshima Prefecture. The locality and habitat were originally recorded as “in sinu insulae ‘Ousima;’ littorale sub lapidibus”; synonymized by Bürger (1904: 83).
Baseodiscus quinquelineatus: Iwata, 1992: 197, pl. 44–2. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 26, 33, 38.
NOTE: Originally described as Borlasia quinquelineata by Quoy and Gaimard (1833: 285) from Dorey, New Guinea, transferred to Baseodiscus by Bürger (1904: 83), Baseodiscus quinquelineatus is distributed in the western Pacific (Japan, Singapore, Indonesia [Java, Timor, Ambon], New Guinea, Solomon Is., Loyalty Is., Torres Straits, and east coast of Australia, including the Great Barrier Reef) (Gibson, 1995: 310).
Genus Cephalomastax Iwata, 1957
Cephalomastax Iwata, 1957a: 5.
TYPE SPECIES: Cephalomastax brevis Iwata, 1957 by monotypic designation.
Cephalomastax brevis Iwata, 1957 [Japanese name: amadaiba-himomushi]
Cephalomastax brevis Iwata, 1957a: 5–7, pl. I, fig. 9, pl. II, fig. 7, pl. III, figs. 1–7; dredged from 200–300 m depth on 7 August 1953 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, “Southern Maruyamadashi at Aamadaiba” [sic], Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1965a: 201. Iwata, 1965b: 392, figs. a, b. Iwata, 1992: 197, fig. 7–3C. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 26, 38.
Class HOPLONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
Subclass MONOSTILIFERA Brinkmann, 1917
Family AMPHIPORIDAE McIntosh, 1874
Genus Amphiporus Ehrenberg, 1831
Amphiporus Ehrenberg, 1831: 63.
TYPE SPECIES: Planaria lactiflorea Johnston, 1828, designated under the plenary power of the ICZN (ICZN, 1992); all previous designations of Amphiporus albicans as the type species for Amphiporus, including that of Friedrich (1955: 154), have thereby been set aside.
Amphiporus antifuscus Iwata, 1954
Amphiporus antifuscus Iwata, 1954a: 24–25, fig. 6A; lower intertidal among algae, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 70. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 25, 33.
NOTE: Gibson and Crandall (1989) listed this form as a species inquirenda.
Amphiporus formidabilis Griffin, 1898
Amphiporus cervicalis: Yamaoka, 2005: 143, pl. 1, figs. 2, 4, text fig. 2; Susaki, Sotoura, and Manazuru, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture; Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
Amphiporus formidabilis: Iwata, 1952: 144–146, figs. 15, 16; intertidal under stones on sandy beaches, Tomioka, Amakusa Islands, Kumamoto Prefecture and Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Okuda, 1947: 1467, fig. 4137. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33.
NOTE: Amphiporus formidabilis Griffin, 1898 was originally described from Puget Sound and Alaska, USA. Coe (1904: 115) synonymized Amphiporus exilis Coe, 1901 with A. formidabilis, but Gibson and Crandall (1989) regarded these taxa as species inquirendae, retaining them as separate species. Amphiporus formidabilis has also been reported from the Aleutian Islands (Coe, 1905: 252). Some earlier records under the name Amphiporus cervicalis (Stimpson, 1857) from Japanese waters may represent Amphiporus formidabilis.
Amphiporus gelatinosus Coe, 1905
Amphiporus gelatinosus: Coe, 1944: 30; obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries Steamer Albatross, at 130 m depth in Uraga Strait, between the Metropolis of Tôkyô and Chiba Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 37.
NOTE: The original description by Coe (1905: 259) was based on a single specimen dredged by Albatross on 9 August 1888 at Station 2853, 56°00′N, 154°20′W, southwest of Kadiak Island, Alaska, at a depth of 159 fathoms (=290 m). Known to occur from Alaska to Puget Sound, Washington State, North America (Gibson, 1995: 283). Gibson and Crandall (1989) included it as a species inquirenda.
Amphiporus imparispinosus Griffin, 1898
Amphiporus imparispinosus: Yamaoka, 2005: 145, text figs. 3, 4a; Sotoura and Mikimoto Island, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
NOTE: Amphiporus imparispinosus was originally described from Port Townsend, Washington and Sitka, Alaska, USA by Griffin (1898). The species is distributed from San Pedro, California, to Puget Sound, Alaska, to the Commander Islands off the coast of Kamchatka, to the Bering Strait (Coe, 1905: 249). Some forms reported as Amphiporus cervicalis (Stimpson, 1857), Amphiporus depressus (Stimpson, 1857), and Amphiporus lactifloreus (Johnston, 1828) from Japanese waters appear to represent A. imparispinosus. Pantinonemertes daguilarensis Gibson and Sundberg, 1992, described from Hong Kong, might be conspecific with Amphiporus imparispinosus. The taxonomic identidy of this species should be delineated by future studies.
Amphiporus insolitus Iwata, 1954
Amphiporus insolitus Iwata, 1954b: 39–41; lower intertidal under stones, Kushimoto, Wakayama Prefecture.Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33.
NOTE: Gibson and Crandall (1989) regarded this form as a species inquirenda. Amphiporus insolitus resembles Diplomma serpentina (Stimpson, 1855) in body coloration, shape of the head, and arrangement of the eyes; these two may be conspecific.
Amphiporus musculus Iwata, 1954
Amphiporus musculus Iwata, 1954a: 26–27, fig. 6B; intertidal among algal holdfasts, Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 70. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 38.
NOTE: Listed as a species inquirenda by Gibson and Crandall (1989).
Amphiporus parvus Yamaoka, 1940
Amphiporus parvus Yamaoka, 1940a: 243–244, pl. XVII, fig. 7, text figs. 20, 21; intertidal on sandy beaches, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1954a: 19. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 69. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33.
NOTE: Listed as a species inquirenda by Gibson and Crandall (1989).
Amphiporus reduncus Iwata, 1957
Amphiporus reduncus Iwata, 1957a: 23–24; dredged sublittorally from 100–130 m depth on 7 August 1950 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, northeastern Nakafukari near Nagai, Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33, 38.
NOTE: Gibson and Crandall (1989) regarded this form as a species inquirenda, with the comment that it may be related to the genus Nipponnemertes or some similar taxon. It might also prove to be a reptantic polystiliferan (Crandall, pers. comm.).
Amphiporus regius Iwata, 1954
Amphioprus regius Iwata, 1954a: 27–29, fig. 7; lower intertidal under stones on rocky shores, Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 70. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33.
NOTE: Listed as a species inquirenda by Gibson and Crandall (1989). The presence of four well-developed eyes and a cephalic patch on the dorsal surface of the head indicates that this species may belong to the genus Tetrastemma or a related taxon.
Amphiporus retrotumidus Iwata, 1957
Amphiporus retrotumidus Iwata, 1957a: 25–27, pl. I, fig. 13; dredged from 30–55 m depth on 6 August 1953 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, “Shuragane at Hayama” [sic], Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 38.
NOTE: Gibson and Crandall (1989) regarded this form as a species inquirenda, with the comment that it may be related to the genus Nipponnemertes or some similar taxon. It might also prove to be a reptantic polystiliferan (Crandall, pers. comm.).
Genus Potamostoma Kajihara, Gibson, and Mawatari, 2003
Potamostoma Kajihara et al., 2003: 492.
TYPE SPECIES: Potamostoma shizunaiense Kajihara, Gibson, and Mawatari, 2003, by original designation.
NOTE: The familial affiliation of the genus, not referred to in its original description, is here provisionally designated as the Amphiporidae because of similarities in eye pattern (multiple and grouped) and the nature of the rhynchocoel wall (two-layered). Confirmation of this familial placement will have to be resolved by future studies, hopefully involving molecular data.
Potamostoma shizunaiense Kajihara, Gibson, and Mawatari, 2003
Potamostoma shizunaiense Kajihara et al., 2003: 491–500, figs. 1–7, tabs. 1–2; under stones on a sandy bottom, salinity at ebb tide 2 psu, mouth of the River Shizunai, 42°20′N, 142°22′E, Shizunai, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype ZIHU-2037, immature female, complete series of transverse sections, 7 μm, 81 slides. Paratypes: ZIHU-1930, immature male, transverse sections of the anterior body region, 6 μm, 39 slides; ZIHU-2040, immature female, complete series of transverse sections, 6 μm, 84 slides. Eight sectioned voucher specimens are also accessioned as ZIHU-1931, -1932, -2038, -2039, -2041, -2042, -2043, and -2044. One voucher specimen, longitudinal sections of the anterior body region, 10 slides, is deposited under NHMW-EV 19875.
Genus Zygonemertes Montgomery, 1897
Zygonemertes Montgomery, 1897: 2.
TYPE SPECIES: Amphiporus virescens Verrill, 1879 by monotypic designation.
Zygonemertes glandulosa Yamaoka, 1940 [Japanese name: fujikasa-himomushi]
Zygonemertes glandulosa Yamaoka, 1940a: 244–247, pl. XVII, fig. 8, text figs. 22–24; lower intertidal under stones, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Okuda, 1947: 1468, fig. 4139 (1–4). Iwata, 1954a: 19. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 69. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 22, 30, 37, 42.
Zygonemertes grandulosa [sic]: Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 12. Iwata, 1965a: 217. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 399, figs. a–d. Iwata, 1992: 202, fig. 7–5C.
Zygonemertes jamsteci Kajihara, 2002
Zygonemertes jamsteci Kajihara, 2002: 131–140, figs. 6–9; about 1 m deep, among eelgrass (Zostera marina), Akkeshi Bay, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-1928, mature male, full series of transverse sections, 43 slides. Paratypes: ZIHU-1929, mature female, serial longitudinal sections of anterior portion of the body, nine slides; ZIHU-2045, mature male, full series of transverse sections, 41 slides; ZIHU-2046, mature male, full series of transverse sections, 36 slides; ZIHU-2047, mature female, serial transverse sections of anterior portion of the body, three slides; ZIHU-2048, mature female, serial transverse sections of the anterior portion of the body, 14 slides. All collected on 8 July 1997.
Zygonemertes shintai Kajihara, 2002
Zygonemertes shintai Kajihara, 2002: 122–131, figs. 1–5; intertidal, among blue mussels (Mytilus trossulus Gould), Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-1296, immature, full series of transverse sections, 16 slides, collected on 2 July 1998. Paratypes: ZIHU-1927, immature, full series of transverse sections, 31 slides, collected on 2 July 1998, ZIHU-2105, -2106; whole specimens, preserved in 100% EtOH for molecular analyses, collected on 3 March 2001.
Family CARCINONEMERTIDAE Sumner, Osburn and Cole, 1913
Genus Carcinonemertes Coe, 1902
Carcinonemertes Coe, 1902: 440.
TYPE SPECIES: Nemertes carcinophilos [originally spelled cartinophilos] Kölliker, 1845, by subsequent designation of Friedrich (1955: 176).
Carcinonemertes mitsukurii Takakura, 1910 [Japanese name: kani-himomushi]
Carcinonemertes mitsukurii Takakura, 1910: 111–116, figs. 1–4; obtained from egg masses of the crab Eriocheir japonicus De Haan, mouth of the River Minatogawa, Tateyama Bay, Chiba Prefecture. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.12. Kaburaki and Iwata, 1965: 397, with one figure. Shiino, 1969: 94. Iwata, 1992: 203. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 19, 26, 30.
Emplectonema mitsukurii: Kaburaki, 1927: 1663, fig. 3182. Kaburaki, 1947: 1466, fig. 4132.
Carcinonemertes mitukuri [sic]: Iwata, 1965a: 218.
NOTE: Apart from the Japanese record, Carcinonemertes mitsukurii is also known from San Andreas Is. (between Marinduque and Luzon), Hong Kong, Hawaiian Is., Kingsmill Is., Society Is., and Singapore (Humes, 1942).
Family CRATENEMERTIDAE Friedrich, 1968
Genus Nipponnemertes Friedrich, 1968
Nipponnemertes Friedrich, 1968: 34.
TYPE SPECIES: Friedrich (1968) did not designate the type species, and the name Nipponnemertes was thus unavailable. This introduced nomenclatural confusion. Gibson and Crandall (1989: 463) designated Amphiporus drepanophoroides Griffin, 1898 as the type species. Gibson (1995: 442) later indicated Nipponnemertes pulchra (Johnston, 1837) as the type species. Finally, Crandall (2001: 106) designated Amphiporus punctatulus Coe, 1905. Crandall (2001: 106) was correct in that Gibson's (1995) listing of Nipponnemertes pulchra as the type species of the genus was invalid, since the nominal species Nemertes pulchra Johnston, 1837 was not included when the genus was established. The nominal species Amphiporus drepanophoroides, first designated by Gibson and Crandall (1989), is eligible for the type species of the genus, but Crandall (2001: 106) discussed that its original description is too brief and its type specimen has been lost by shipwreck. Confusion remains as to whether the author of the name is Gibson and Crandall (1989) or Crandall (2001) (Chernyshev, pers. comm.). Here, I follow the prevailing usage of the authority and date of the name Nipponnemertes as Friedrich (1968).
Nipponnemertes bimaculata (Coe, 1901) [Japanese name: rishiri-himomushi]
Amphiporus bimaculatus: Iwata, 1954a: 21–22, fig. 5D; sublittoral among laminarian holdfasts, Rishiri Island, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 69. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 14. Iwata, 1965b: 399, figs. a–e.
Nipponnemertes bimaculata Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 20, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: The species, originally described as Amphiporus bimaculatus Coe, 1901 from Victoria, B.C., Canada, and Sitka, Alaska and Puget Sound, Washington, USA, was later transferred to the genus Nipponnemertes by Friedrich (1968). Crandall et al. (2002) noted that the form identified by Iwata (1954a) differs from Coe's (1901) taxon in having a pair of quadrangular head markings, rather than the long-triangular markings of Coe's form, and a quite different proboscis central armature.
Nipponnemertes ogumai (Yamaoka, 1947) [Japanese name: oguma-himomushi]
Amphiporus ogumai Yamaoka, 1947: 1468, fig. 4138 (1–3). Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 399, figs. a–c.
Nipponnemertes ogumai: Crandall et al., 2001: 179–180, pl. 1, figs. 8–10, pl. 2, fig. 18. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 20, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Crandall et al. (2001) mentioned that the type locality for this species was not specified in the original manuscript; Yamaoka (1947) obtained specimens on sandy beaches at Itado, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture and Seto, Kishû (probably Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture).
Nipponnemertes punctatula (Coe, 1905) [Japanese name: madara-himomushi]
Amphiporus nebulosus: Takakura, 1933: 226–227; Kitaura, Alaid Island (=Atlasova), Kurile Islands. Non Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 24, 26, 33.
Amphiporus punctatulus: Iwata, 1951: 137–138, figs. 1, 2D; intertidal under stones, Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture. Iwata, 1952: 143–144; lower intertidal under stones, Tomioka, Amakusa Islands, Kumamoto Prefecture and Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Iwata, 1954a: 22–23; intertidal among algal holdfasts, Oshoro and Rishiri Island, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1954b: 39; intertidal under stones, Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 70. Utinomi, 1956: 32, pl. 16, fig. 12. Iwata, 1957a: 21–22; obtained by a hand-reeled net on 16 March 1956 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Samejima at Hayama, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 13. Utinomi, 1960: 32, pl. 16, fig. 12. Inaba, 1963: 228; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Iwata, 1965a: 169. Iwata, 1965b: 400, figs. a–c. Utinomi, 1969: 32, pl. 16, fig. 12. Saito and Suzuki, 1974: 38; intertidal, Niisaki Beach, Kanagawa Prefecture; identified by Dr. Iwata. Inaba, 1988: 226; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, under stones on gravelly to rocky shores, commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto.
Amphiporus punctatus [sic]: Okada et al., 1971: 62. Kikuchi, 1968: 167; among Zostera marina, Tomioka Bay, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture.
Amphiporus puncutatulus [sic]: Honma and Kitami, 1978: 15; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture.
Cratenemertes punctatulus: Iwata, 1992: 202, pl. 44–9, fig. 7–2E.
Nipponnemertes punctatulus [sic]: Uchida et al., 1972: 55; habitat not recorded, Horomui, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1997: 53 (with a color drawing), 55. Shimomura et al., 2001: 46; intertidal on a rocky shore, Akahama, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003: 408; Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
Nipponnemertes punctatula: Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 20, 25, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Takakura's (1933) record of Amphiporus nebulosus Coe, 1901 from the Kurile Islands was regarded as Amphiporus punctatulus by Iwata (1951), whereas Amphiporus nebulosus s. str., known only from its type locality Kukak Bay, Alaska Peninsula, was regarded as a species inquirenda by Gibson and Crandall (1989). Crandall et al. (2002) noted that there are two coexisting species of cratenemertids in Japanese waters that possess a brown dorsal blotch pattern, Nipponnemertes arenaria (Uschakov, 1927) and Nipponnemertes punctatula (Coe, 1905), and the records of the latter by Iwata in the 1950s were probably of Nipponnemertes arenaria.
Family EMPLECTONEMATIDAE Bürger, 1904
Genus Emplectonema Stimpson, 1857
Emplectonema Stimpson, 1857: 163.
TYPE SPECIES: Emplectonema viride Stimpson, 1857, was originally described from San Francisco, USA, and now is regarded as a junior synonym of Nemertes gracilis Johnston, 1837, by subsequent designation of Friedrich (1955: 172).
Emplectonema buergeri Coe, 1901
Emplectonema bürgeri [sic]: Coe, 1944: 29, obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries Steamer Albatross, 250 m depth, off Ôshima, the Metropolis of Tôkyô.
Emplectonema buergeri: Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 20, 24, 27, 34, 39.
NOTE: Originally described from Sitka and Glacier Bay, Alaska by Coe (1901: 28), known to be distributed in North Pacific (Japan, Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, and the coast of North America from Alaska to California) (Gibson, 1995: 362).
Emplectonema gracile (Johnston, 1837) [Japanese name: hoso-midori-himomushi]
Emplectonema gracile: Yamaoka, 1940a: 237–238, pl. XVII, figs. 1, 2, text fig. 14; lower intertidal on the surfaces of stones, Daikokujima, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1954a: 15; intertidal on the surfaces of stones or in rock crevices, Akkeshi and Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 68. Iwata, 1957c: 102. Iwata, 1960a: 96, fig. 5. Iwata, 1960b: 27–35, figs. 97–122; intertidal, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 7; habitat not recorded, Asamushi, Aomori Prefecture. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 218. Iwata, 1965b: 396, figs. a, b. Tsuchiya, 1979: 82; intertidal, Hadakajima Island, Asamushi, and Aomori Harbor, Aomori Prefecture. Iwata, 1983: 181, 182, 184, figs. 8–5j, i, 8–13c.. Iwata, 1992: 202–203, fig. 7–4K, 7–5D. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 20, 27, 34, 39.
NOTE: Originally described as Nemertes gracilis from the British Isles by Johnston (1837); transferred to Emplectonema by Verrill (1895: 528). Other than Japanese waters, the species is widely distributed in the northern hemisphere: Peter the Great Bay, Aleutian Islands, Pacific coast of North America, northern coast of Europe, Mediterranean, Rumanian coast of the Black Sea, and Madeira (Gibson, 1995: 432).
Emplectonema kandai Kato, 1939 [Japanese name: hikari-himomushi]
Emplectonema kandai Kato, 1939: 251–253, pl. XXXII, figs. 1–6; sublittoral on the tunic of Chelyosoma siboja collected from sandy or muddy bottom, 30–40 m depth, near Asamushi Marine Biological Station, Aomori Bay, Aomori Prefecture. Kanda, 1939: 166–173, figs. 1–4. Kato, 1947: 1466, fig. 4134. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.13. Iwata, 1965a: 218. Kato and Iwata, 1965: 396, figs. a, b. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 20, 27, 39.
Emplectonema candai [sic]: Iwata, 1970b: 129.
NOTE: Emplectonema kandai is so far the only known luminescent species in the phylum.
Emplectonema mitsuii Yamaoka, 1947 [Japanese name: mitsui-himomushi]
Emplectonema mitsuii Yamaoka, 1947: 1466, fig. 4133; intertidal among algae on rocky shores in southern Japan. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.7. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 397, figs. a–d. Crandall et al., 2001: 177–178, pl. 1, figs. 1–4, pl. 2, figs. 16, 16a, 16b. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 20, 27, 34.
NOTE: Crandall et al. (2001) introduced Yamaoka's original data on the habitat and locality of this species as intertidal among rockweeds at Susaki, Sotoura, and Mikimoto Island, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
Genus Nemertopsis Bürger, 1895
Nemertopsis Bürger, 1895: 548.
TYPE SPECIES: Nemertes peronea Quatrefages, 1846 (now regarded as a junior synonym of Polia bivittata Delle Chiaje, 1841) by subsequent designation of Friedrich (1955: 173).
NOTE: Chernyshev (pers. comm.) indicated that the genus Nemertopsis Bürger, 1895 has a senior subjective synonym, Colpocephalus Diesing, 1850 (type species Borlasia quadripunctata Quoy and Gaimard, 1833). As far as I am aware, the name Colpocephalus Diesing, 1850 has not been used as valid since the year 1899, meeting the condition in Article 23.9.1.1 of the Code (ICZN, 1999). The junior subjective synonym Nemertopsis was used during the decade from 1989 to 1998 in the following 27 works, published by 25 authors, and thus meets the condition in Article 23.9.1.2 of the Code (ICZN, 1999): Fish and Fish (1989), Morton (1989), Riser (1989), Britton (1990), Gibson (1990a, b, 1997a,b, 1998), Gibson and Knight-Jones (1990), Turbeville (1991), Iwata (1992), Roe (1993), Hansson (1994), Henry and Martindale (1994, 1996, 1997a, b), Sun and Pan (1994), Walker (1994), Martindale and Henry (1995), Senz (1997b), Boyer and Henry (1998), Envall (1998), Hochberg and Lunianski (1998), Norenburg and Roe (1998), and Stricker and Folsom (1998). The name Nemertopsis Bürger, 1895 is herein regarded to have precedence over Colpocephalus Diesing, 1850, whenever the two names are considered to be synonymous, according to Article 23.9.2 of the Code (ICZN, 1999).
Nemertopsis mitellicola Kajihara, 2007
Nemertopsis mitellicola Kajihara, 2007a: 51–57, figs. 7–11; among the gooseneck barnacle, Capitulum mitella (Linnaeus), Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-3204, serial transverse sections of the complete body, total 52 slides: 6 μm, anterior end of body (1 cm long), 12 slides; 8 μm, rest of the body, 40 slides. Paratypes: ZIHU-3205, serial transverse sections of head (1.5 cm long), 8 μm, 15 slides; ZIHU-3206, serial longitudinal sections, 12 μm, 12 slides.
Nemertopsis quadripunctata (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833) [Japanese name: yotsume-himomushi]
Nemertopsis gracilis: Iwata, 1954b: 38–39, fig. 2A; in the mantle cavity of Capitulum mitella (Linnaeus), Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 32, pl. 16, fig. 14. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 8; Onomichi, Hiroshima Prefecture; Tomioka, Amakusa Islands, Kumamoto Prefecture; Cape Muroto, Kôchi Prefecture. Utinomi, 1960: 32, pl. 16, fig. 14. Inaba, 1963: 228; upper to mid intertidal, in the mantle cavity of Capitulum mitella (Linnaeus), the Inland Sea of Seto. Iwata, 1965a: 218. Iwata, 1965b: 397; figs. a–c. Shiino, 1969: 94. Utinomi, 1969: 32, pl. 16, fig. 14. Inaba, 1988: 226; upper to mid intertidal, in the mantle cavity of Capitulum mitella (Linnaeus), the Inland Sea of Seto. Iwata, 1992: 203, fig. 7–5F.
Nemertopsis quadripunctata: Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 20, 28, 31, 35, 40. Kajihara, 2007a: 45–51, figs. 2–6; from Capitulum mitella (Linnaeus), Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture.
NOTE: Nemertopsis quadripunctata was originally described as Borlasia quadripunctata Quoy and Gaimard, 1833 from Ambon, Indonesia. The Japanese taxon identified as Nemertopsis gracilis Coe, 1904 was regarded as conspecific with Nemertopsis quadripunctata by Gibson (1990a). Apart from the records from Japanese waters, the species is currently known from Ambon (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833) and Hong Kong (Gibson, 1990a).
Genus Paranemertes Coe, 1901
Paranemertes Coe, 1901: 32.
TYPE SPECIES: Paranemertes peregrina Coe, 1901, by subsequent designation of Friedrich (1955: 173).
Paranemertes incola Iwata, 1952
Paranemertes incola Iwata, 1952: 142–143; lower intertidal under stones, Tomioka, Amakusa Islands, Kumamoto Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 21, 28, 36, 41.
Paranemertes katoi Yamaoka, 1947 [Japanese name: katô-himomushi]
Paranemertes katoi Yamaoka, 1947: 1467, fig. 4135. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 397, figs. a–c. Crandall et al., 2001: 178–179, pl. 1, figs. 5–7, pl. 2, fig. 15. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 21, 28, 36, 41.
NOTE: Crandall et al. (2001) noted that Yamaoka's manuscript reported the species as intertidally abundant from May to July under stones or on seaweeds at Susaki and Sotoura, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
Paranemertes peregrina Coe, 1901 [Japanese name: onando-himomushi]
Paranemertes peregrina: Yamaoka, 1940a: 240–243, pl. XVII, figs. 3–5, text figs. 17–19; intertidal under or between stones; Akkeshi, Abashiri, and Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Coe, 1944: 29. Okuda, 1947: 1467, fig. 4136. Iwata, 1954a: 15; lower intertidal under stones or among laminarian holdfasts, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Monbetsu, Muroran, Nemuro, Oshoro and Rishiri Island). Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 68. Utinomi, 1956: 32, pl. 16, fig. 11. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 9. Utinomi, 1960: 32, pl. 16, fig. 11. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 398, figs. a–d. Utinomi, 1969: 32, pl. 16, fig. 11. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Hieda and Takahashi, 1986: 42, with two color photographs of a specimen taken at Yakumo, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1992: 203, figs. 7–4J, 7–5E. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 21, 25, 28, 36, 41.
NOTE: Paranemertes peregrina Coe, 1901 was originally described from Alaska. Yamaoka's (1940a) illustration in pl. XVII, fig. 6 depicts Amphiporus parvus, though the figure legend indicates Paranemertes peregrina. Besides the records from Japanese waters, the species is also known from the Commander Islands, Kamchatka Peninsula, Aleutian Islands, and the Pacific coast of North America from Alaska to Ensenada, Mexico (Gibson, 1995: 460).
Paranemertes plana Iwata, 1957 [Japanese name: sagami-himomushi]
Paranemertes plana Iwata, 1957a: 20–21, pl I, fig. 10, pl. VI, figs. 1–5; dredged sublittorally from 250–300 m depth on 16 July 1955 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, near “Gorombo of southern Minamiaamadaiba” [sic], Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 10. Iwata, 1965b: 398, figs. a, b. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 21, 29, 41.
Family MALACOBDELLIDAE Blanchard, 1847
Genus Malacobdella Blainville, 1827
Malacobdella Blainville, 1827: 270.
TYPE SPECIES: Hirudo glossa Müller, 1776, by monotypic designation.
Malacobdella japonica Takakura, 1897 [Japanese name: himobiru]
Malacobdella japonica Takakura, 1897: 105–112, pl. VII, figs. 1–6; in the mantle cavity of Mactra sachalinensis, Kujûkuri, Chiba Prefecture. Kaburaki, 1927: 1664, fig. 3184. Yamaoka, 1940a: 253–258, pl. XVII, figs. 14–16, text figs. 32, 33; in the mantle cavity of Mactra sachalinensis, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Kawai and Yamaoka, 1940: 255–259, figs. 1–6; in the mantle cavity of Mactra sachalinensis, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Kaburaki, 1947: 1470, fig. 4145. Iwata, 1954a: 36; in the mantle cavity of Mactra sachalinensis, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture and Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 73. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 19. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.11. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 218. Kaburaki and Iwata, 1965: 401, figs. a, b. Shiino, 1969: 94, fig. 9–3F. Okada et al., 1971: 63. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Iwata, 1992: 204, fig. 7–4M. Iwata, 1997: 55. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 23, 28, 44.
NOTE: Apart from the records from Japanese waters, Malacobdella japonica has also been reported from Sakhalin (Steksova, 2004).
Family OTOTYPHLONEMERTIDAE Bürger, 1895
Genus Ototyphlonemertes Diesing, 1863
Ototyphlonemertes Diesing, 1863: 180.
TYPE SPECIES: Oerstedia pallida Keferstein, 1862, by monotypic designation.
Ototyphlonemertes dolichobasis Kajihara, 2007
Ototyphlonemertes sp. Shimomura et al., 2001: 47. Ototyphlonemertes dolichobasis Kajihara, 2007b: 57–66, figs. 1–4; intertidal among coarse sand, Hakozaki, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-3200, 22 July 1998, 23 slides. Paratypes: ZIHU-3199, 22 July 1998, 7 slides; ZIHU-3201, 25 September 1997, 16 slides; ZIHU-3202, 25 September 1997, 42 slides; ZIHU-3203, 25 September 1997, 31 slides; ZIHU-3208, 3209, 25 May 1998, unsectioned, fixed in Bouin's fluid, preserved in 70% EtOH; ZIHU-3210, 3211, 3212, 3214, 3215, 21 July 1998, unsectioned, fixed in Bouin's fluid, preserved in 70% EtOH; ZIHU-3213, 21 July 1998, fixed and preserved in 99% EtOH; ZIHU-3217, 3218, 22 July 1998, unsectioned, fixed in Bouin's fluid, preserved in 70% EtOH.
Ototyphlonemertes martynovi Chernyshev, 1993
Ototyphlonemertes martynovi: Kajihara, 1998: 11, pls 1–2; intertidal in coarse sand, Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture; Ôtsuchi, Iwate Prefecture; Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture; Sugashima, Mie Prefecture; Mukaishima, Hiroshima Prefecture. Shimomura et al., 2001: 46; intertidal in coarse sand, Hakozaki, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 20, 28, 43.
NOTE: Ototyphlonemertes martynovi Chernyshev, 1993 was originally described from Peter the Great Bay, Russia, and appears to have a wide range of distribution in Japanese waters.
Ototyphlonemertes nikolaii Chernyshev, 1998
Ototyphlonemertes nikolaii: Shimomura et al., 2001: 47; intertidal among coarse sand Hakozaki, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 20, 28, 43.
NOTE: Ototyphlonemertes nikolaii Chernyshev, 1998 was originally described from Peter the Great Bay, Russia. The species is currently known from Russia and Japan.
Family POSEIDONEMERTIDAE Chernyshev, 2002
Genus Diopsonemertes Kajihara, Gibson and Mawatari, 2001
Diopsonemertes Kajihara et al., 2001: 187.
TYPE SPECIES: Diopsonemertes acanthocephalan Kajihara, Gibson and Mawatari, 2001, by original designation.
Diopsonemertes acanthocephala Kajihara, Gibson and Mawatari, 2001
Diopsonemertes acanthocephala Kajihara et al., 2001: 187–198, figs. 1–23: Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture; sublittoral, 59 m depth on shell gravel. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 20, 27, 34.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-1290, immature male, complete series of transverse sections, 71 slides.
Family PROSORHOCHMIDAE Bürger, 1895
Genus Geonemertes Semper, 1863
Geonemertes Semper, 1863: 559.
TYPE SPECIES: Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863, by monotypic designation.
Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863 [Japanese name: ogasawara-riku-himomushi]
Geonemertes pelaensis: Oki et al., 1987: 69–75, figs. 1–4; among roadside bushes and under a flowerpot in a garden, Chichijima Island, Ogasawara Islands, the Metropolis of Tôkyô. Kawakatsu, 1991: 2, fig. 15. Kawakatsu, 1999: 11–12, figs. 1–5.
NOTE: Semper's (1863) original description of Geonemertes pelaensis was based upon material collected from the Palau Islands, Republic of Palau. The species is also known from Papua New Guinea, Sulawesi, Seychelle Islands, Peradeniya (Sri Lanka), Kei Island, Upolu Island (Samoa), Mauritius, Florida, Dominica (West Indies), Jamaica, Mangareva Island, Oahu (Hawaiian Islands), and Réunion (Gibson and Moore, 1998: 159).
Genus Pantinonemertes Moore and Gibson, 1981
Pantinonemertes Moore and Gibson, 1981: 176.
TYPE SPECIES: Pantinonemertes winsori Moore and Gibson, 1981, by original designation.
NOTE: The genus Pantinonemertes Moore and Gibson, 1981 now contains nine species (Sun, 2001), but the generic name has a subjective senior synonym Neonemertes Girard, 1893 (Chernyshev, pers. comm.). Moore and Gibson (1981) recognized the genus Pantinonemertes as including three nominal species: Pantinonemertes winsori Moore and Gibson, 1981, Pantinonemertes enalios Moore and Gibson, 1981, and Tetrastemma agricola Willemoes-Suhm, 1874 (the name-bearing type of the nominal genus Neonemertes Girard, 1893), while Moore and Gibson (1981) designated Pantinonemertes winsori Moore and Gibson, 1981 as the type species of the genus Pantinonemertes Moore and Gibson, 1981. The name Neonemertes has been used as valid by six works, including Girard (1893: 238), Joubin (1894: 193), Friedrich (1955: 142, 143, 161, 1958: 22), Corrêa (1966: 365), and Riser (1974: 363, 364), whereas Pantinonemertes has been used in at least 42 works since the year 1981. It is thus reasonable to conclude that the name Pantinonemertes has been adopted as the prevailing usage, and that the senior synonym Neonemertes should be suppressed by plenary power by the ICZN under Article 23.9.3 of the Code (ICZN, 1999). Recently, Maslakova (2005) concluded that these two genera should be synonymized due to lack of morphological differences between them, on the basis of a reinvestigation of all available type and voucher material of species of Pantinonemertes Moore and Gibson 1981 and Prosadenoporus Bürger, 1890. The name Prosadenoporus Bürger, 1890 has precedence over both Neonemertes Girard, 1893 and Pantinonemertes Gibson and Moore, 1981. However, since Maslakova (2005) disclaimed nomenclatural acts, the name Pantinonemertes Gibson and Moore 1981 is here used as valid.
Pantinonemertes spectacula (Yamaoka, 1940)
Prostoma spectaculum Yamaoka, 1940b: 16–17, fig. 3; habitat not recorded, Naha and Chinen, Okinawa Prefecture.
Pantinonemertes speculacula: Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 21, 31, 43.
NOTE: Gibson (1990a) redescribed the material from Hong Kong and transferred this species to the genus Pantinonemertes. Currently known from Okinawa and Hong Kong.
Family TETRASTEMMATIDAE Hubrecht, 1879
NOTE: The correct spelling of the family name is “Tetrastemmatidae” under Article, 29.3. of the Code (ICZN, 1999), since the name of its type genus Tetrastemma (neuter gender) gives the genitive singular “Tetrastemmatos” and the stem “Tetrastemmat-.”
Genus Nemertellina Friedrich, 1935
Nemertellina Friedrich, 1935b: 10.
TYPE SPECIES: Nemertellina oculata Friedrich, 1935 by subsequent designation of Friedrich (1955: 164).
Nemertellina yamaokai Kajihara, Gibson and Mawatari, 2000 [Japanese name: yamaoka-himomushi]
Nemertellina minuta: Yamaoka, 1940a: 239–240, text figs. 15, 16; sublittoral from several meters depth; in the canals of sponges; Akkeshi Bay, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1954a: 15. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 68. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 20, 28, 35, 40. Non Friedrich, 1935a: 320.
Nemertellina yamaokai Kajihara et al., 2000: 265–276, figs. 1–33; sublittoral, 6–8 m depth among sponges, seaweeds, rocks, and mollusks (Patinopecten sp. and oysters), 43°00′N, 144°46′E and 43°42′N, 144°51′E, Akkeshi Bay, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Crandall et al. 2002: 12, 20, 28, 35. Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003: 408; Akkeshi Bay, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, ZIHU-1260, immature male, complete series of transverse sections, 26 slides. Paratypes: ZIHU-1261, female, series of transverse sections, 24 slides; ZIHU-1262, male, complete series of longitudinal sections, 14 slides; USNM 186063, female, complete series of transverse sections, 17 slides. Three unsectioned voucher specimens are also deposited under ZIHU-1271, ZIHU-1272, and ZIHU-1273.
Genus Oerstedia Quatrefages, 1846
Oerstedia Quatrefages, 1846: 221.
TYPE SPECIES: Oerstedia maculata Quatrefages, 1846, now regarded as a junior synonym of Planaria dorsalis Abildgaard, 1806.
NOTE: The genus Oerstedia Quatrefages, 1846 had long been classified into the family Prosorhochmidae, before Moore and Gibson (1988) argued that the genus could no longer be retained in that taxon. The familial affiliation of the genus has been treated as uncertain (Gibson, 1994). A recent molecular phylogenetic study (Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003) indicated that members of the genus are closely related to tetrastemmatids, although Strand and Sundberg's (2005b) molecular phylogenetic analyses were not decisive about the familial classification. The genus is here provisionally included in the family Tetrastemmatidae.
Oerstedia dorsalis (Abildgaard, 1806) [Japanese name: botan-himomushi]
Oerstedia dorsalis: Iwata, 1954a: 17, fig. 4A; lower intertidal among algae or the hydrozoan Eudendrium annulatum, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 68. Iwata, 1960a: 96, fig. 6. Iwata, 1960c: 169; pl. 84, fig. 11. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 218. Iwata, 1965b: 398; figs. a–e. Iwata, 1983: 181. Iwata, 1992: 203, fig. 7–5H. Shimomura et al., 2001: 47: intertidal, Akahama, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 20, 28, 35, 40.
Oerstedia dorsalis var. aequalis Iwata, 1954a: 17, fig. 4A–4; lower intertidal among algae or the hydrozoan Eudendrium annulatum, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 28.
Oerstedia dorsalis var. albolineata: Iwata, 1954a: 17, fig. 4A–2, 4A–3 lower intertidal among algae or the hydrozoan Eudendrium annulatum, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1960b: 35–40, figs. 123–142; intertidal, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1983: 182, 187, 193, fig. 8–14c. Oerstedia dorsalis var. viridis: Iwata, 1954a: 17, fig. 4A–1 lower intertidal among algae or the hydrozoan Eudendrium annulatum, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
NOTE: Oerstedia dorsalis, originally described as Planaria dorsalis by Abildgaard (1806) from Denmark and Norway, was transferred to Oerstedia by Bürger (1895: 592). The species is known to exhibit a high degree of polymorphism in body color pattern (Bürger, 1895; Iwata, 1954a; Brunberg, 1964). A series of studies based on morphological (Sundberg, 1984) and molecular (Sundberg and Janson, 1988; Sundberg and Andersson, 1995) evidence have revealed the existence of a cryptic species, Oerstedia striata, that can be distinguished from Oerstedia dorsalis by enzyme differences, external pigmentation, and the general appearance of the body (Sundberg, 1988). The forms reported under the name Oerstedia dorsalis are known from the coast of North America (from Puget Sound, Washington to Mexico), Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic coast of North America (Nova Scotia to Florida), western Baltic Sea, North Sea, Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, northwestern Spain, and Madeira (Gibson, 1995: 467). Due to the high polymorphism, different taxa may be contained among these forms. Numerous varieties have been named, including three reported from Japanese waters: var. aequalis Iwata, 1954a, var. albolineata Bürger, 1895, and var. viridis Bürger, 1895. Until future studies determine whether or not these varieties warrant separate taxonomic status, these are regarded as synonymous with Oerstedia dorsalis.
Oerstedia polyorbis Iwata, 1954
Oerstedia polyorbis Iwata, 1954a: 18–19, fig. 4B; lower intertidal among the hydrozoan Eudendrium annulatum Norman, Daikokujima Island, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 69. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 20, 28, 35, 40.
?Oerstedia zebra: Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003: 408; Akkeshi Bay, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
?Oerstedia venusta: Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003: 408; Akkeshi Bay, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
NOTE 1: Iwata (1954: 18) established Oerstedia polyorbis, which is about 5 mm in body length, with about 30 transverse dorsal bands and cephalic glands that are not well developed and limited only to the anterior portion of the head. Later, Chernyshev (1993: 13) described a similar form, Oerstediella (Paroerstediella) zebra (now Oerstedia zebra), which differs from Oerstedia polyorbis in body length (8–13 mm), the number of the transverse dorsal bands (10–18), and in having cephalic glands extending behind brain. However, ten specimens obtained from the same population as those that Thollesson and Norenburg (2003) identified as Oerstedia zebra, possessed 9–16 transverse bands, with body length varying from 2–4 mm and cephalic glands extending behind brain; there was a pair of pores on the ventral surface of the head, which represented the openings of the cerebral organ ducts, but there were no distinct anterior cephalic furrows (Kajihara, pers. obs.). This overlap in characters indicates that Oerstedia zebra might be a junior synonym of Oerstedia polyorbis.
NOTE 2: Thollesson and Norenburg (2003) identified their material from Akkeshi as Oerstedia venusta. Specimens from the same locality (n=10) were almost identical with what these authors identified as Oerstedia zebra in both external and internal morphology, except for the transverse dorsal bands that were present in the latter. However, the form identified as Oerstedia venusta by Thollesson and Norenburg (2003) differs from Iwata's (1954a) original description in not having distinct anterior cephalic furrows. It remains uncertain whether Oerstedia venusta sensu Thollesson and Norenburg (2003) represents the same taxon as Iwata's (1954a) form. Oerstedia venusta sensu Thollesson and Norenburg (2003) also resembles Oerstedia oculata (Kulikova, 1987) in external characters.
NOTE 3: Strand and Sundberg (2005a: 210) regarded Oerstedia zebra (Chernyshev, 1993) sensu Thollesson and Norenburg (2003) and Oerstedia venusta Iwata, 1954 sensu Thollesson and Norenburg (2003) as synonymous, on the basis of genetic similarity. However, as the taxonomic identity of the latter is unclear, Strand and Sundberg's (2005a) synonymization may require additional topotypic data before it is substantiated.
Genus Prostoma Dugès, 1828
Prostoma Dugès, 1828: 140.
Stichostemma Montgomery, 1894: 8; synonymized by Bürger (1904: 53).
TYPE SPECIES: The genus Prostoma was long used for species of Tetrastemma, until Stiasny-Wijnhoff (1938) circumscribed Prostoma to include only freshwater species. The single species included in the nominal genus Prostoma when it was established was Prostoma clepsinoides Dugès, 1828, which was the only nominal species eligible to be the type species of the genus. However, Friedrich (1955: 162) indicated “Prostoma lumbricoideum Dugès (1828) [sic]” (correctly Prostoma lombricoideum Dugès, 1830) as the type species of Prostoma, and recently Gibson (1995: 495) indicated Prostoma graecense (Bömig, 1892). These nomenclatural acts cannot be regarded as valid designations of the type species, according to Article 67.2 of the Code (ICZN, 1999). Meanwhile, the taxonomic identity indicated by the name Prostoma clepsinoides has been regarded as vague (Stiasny-Wijnhoff, 1938; Gibson and Moore, 1976). When it becomes necessary to delineate the identity of Prostoma, especially in comparison with similar genera like Limnemertes, nomenclatural actions will be required, such as either 1) removing the name-bearing function from Prostoma clepsinoides and bestowing it on a well-known species like Prostoma graecense, or 2) designating a neotype for Prostoma clepsinoides, ideally obtained from the type locality, probably Montpellier, France.
Prostoma ohmiense Chernyshev, Timoshkin, and Kawakatsu, 1998
Prostoma ohmiense Chernyshev et al., 1998: 53–60, figs. 2–6; on rocks with overgrowing algae, 2 m depth, Lake Biwako, off Kitakomatsu, Shiga-chô, Shiga-gun, and off Shin-asahi-chô, Takashima-gun, Shiga Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 43.
TYPE MATERIAL: The holotype and two paratypes are supposed to be deposited in Biwako Museum, according to the original description. However, due to confusion arising during transportation of the specimens, the holotype cannot be identified among the specimens in the museum (Dr. Mark J. Grygier, pers. comm.).
Genus Quasitetrastemma Chernyshev, 2004
Quasitetrastemma Chernyshev, 2004b: 152.
TYPE SPECIES: Tetrastemma nigrifrons Coe, 1904, by original designation.
Quasitetrastemma nigrifrons (Coe, 1904) [Japanese name: menoko-himomushi]
Prostoma nigrifrons: Yamaoka, 1940a: 249–251, pl. XVI, fig. 14, pl. XVII, figs. 9–12, text figs. 26–29; lower intertidal under stones, Akkeshi and Abashiri, Hokkaidô Prefecture; sublittoral, among the canal system of sponges attached to gastropod shells collected from a depth of several meters, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Okuda, 1947: 1469, fig. 4142 (1–8).
Tetrastemma nigrifrons: Iwata, 1954a: 30–32, fig. 8B. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 71, fig. 18–2. Utinomi, 1956: 32, pl. 16, fig. 15. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 16. Utinomi, 1960: 32, pl. 16, fig. 15. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 218. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 400, figs. a–h. Utinomi, 1969: 32, pl. 16, fig. 15. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Uchida et al., 1972: 55; habitat not recorded, Horomui, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1992: 203, fig. 7–4I. Shimomura et al., 2001: 47; shallow sublittoral, among sessile organisms on mooring floats, Akahama, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Crandall et al. 2002: 14, 21, 29, 36, 41.
Tetrastemma nigrifrons var. bilineatum: Iwata, 1957a: 27, pl. I, fig. 14; collected subtidally from 4–6 m depth on 8 December 1953 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Samejima at Hayama, Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 36, 41.
Tetrastemma nigrifrons var. punctatum: Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 36, 41.
Tetrastemma nigrifrons var. spadix: Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 37, 41.
NOTE: Originally described as Tetrastemma nigrifrons by Coe (1904: 159) from Pacific Grove (36°38′N 121°56′W) and San Pedro, California, USA, the species was recently transferred to Quasitetrastemma by Chernyshev (2004b). Known from the Pacific coasts of North and Central America (Puget Sound, Washington, to Salinas Bay, Costa Rica) (Gibson, 1995: 520), the species shows a high degree of polymorphism in color pattern (Coe, 1940: 305). The following varieties have been named: var. albino Manchenko and Kulikova, 1996b; var. bicolor Coe, 1904; var. bilineatum Iwata, 1954a; var. pallidum Coe, 1904; var. punctata Iwata, 1954a; var. purpureum Coe, 1904; var. spadix Iwata, 1954a; and var. zonatum Coe, 1940. Manchenko and Kulikova (1996b) demonstrated by isozyme analyses that the five sympatric varieties albino, bicolor, pallidum, punctata, and purpureum are conspecific. Incidentally, Manchenko and Kulikova's (1996b) description of their var. albino that possesses no pigmentation gives the impression that it might represent Quasitetrastemma stimpsoni.
Quasitetrastemma stimpsoni (Chernyshev, 1992)
Prostoma stigmatum: Yamaoka, 1940a: 251–253, pl. XVII, fig. 13, text figs. 30, 31; intertidal under stones or among algae, Akkeshi and Abashiri, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Tetrastemma stigmatum: Iwata, 1954a: 35; intertidal under stones and among algae, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Abashiri, Akkeshi and Hiroo). Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 72. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Non Stimpson, 1857: 163.
Tetrastemma stimpsoni Chernyshev, 1992: 135. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 22, 25, 29, 37, 42.
Quasitetrastemma stigmatum: Chernyshev, 2004b: 154.
NOTE 1: Although Stimpson's (1857) original description of Tetrastemma stigmatum was brief and accompanied by no illustration, Yamaoka (1940a) and Iwata (1954a) considered their material as conspecific with Stimpson's. Based upon literature, Chernyshev (1992) regarded Prostoma stigmatum sensu Yamaoka (1940a) as different from Tetrastemma stigmatum Stimpson, 1857 and gave to Yamaoka's taxon a new name, Tetrastemma stimpsoni Chernyshev, 1992, while he considered the name Tetrastemma stigmatum to be a nomen dubium. Later, Chernyshev (2004b) transferred Tetrastemma stigmatum (=Prostoma stigmatum) sensu Yamaoka (1940a) into Quasitetrastemma Chernyshev, 2004, ascribing “Quasitetrastemma stigmatum (Yamaoka, 1940).” Chernyshev's (1992, 2004b) treatment of the names raises the following two issues: 1) Homonymy. Chernyshev (2004b) states “Prostoma stigmatum Yamaoka, 1940 was replaced by a new name Tetrastemma stimpsoni,” although Yamaoka (1940a) did not establish any nominal species bearing the epithet stigmatum. Accordingly, there was no homonymy when Chernyshev (1992) created a new name. 2) Authorship. As mentioned, Chernyshev (2004b) appears to misinterpret Yamaoka (1940a) as establishing a new nominal species Prostoma stigmatum. Since Stimpson's material is deemed to belong to a different species from Yamaoka's, the latter taxon name should be ascribed as Quasitetrastemma stimpsoni (Chernyshev, 1992).
NOTE 2: It seems likely that Yamaoka did not have access to a copy of Stimpson's 1857 paper, and probably had to refer to Bürger (1904) for the identification of his material as Prostoma stigmatum. Unfortunately, the German translation of an excerpt of Stimpson's (1857) Latin description of the species in Bürger (1904) lacked an important sentence for the identification of tetrastemmatids, namely, the presence and coloration of the cephalic patch. Nothing equivalent to the sentence in Stimpson (1857: 163) “pone ocellos anteriores fascia transversa obscure rubra” [behind the anterior eyes there is a dark red transverse band] can be found in Bürger (1904). This could account for why Yamaoka (1940a) identified his material without a cephalic patch as Tetrastemma stigmatum, and also why he later established a new species that possessed a red cephalic patch as Tetrastemma roseocephalum.
Genus Sacconemertella Iwata, 1970
Sacconemertella Iwata, 1970a: 147.
TYPE SPECIES: Sacconemertella lutulenta Iwata, 1970 by original designation.
Sacconemertella lutulenta Iwata, 1970 [Japanese name: chibi-kisui-himomushi]
Sacconemertella lutulenta Iwata, 1970a: 148–151, fig. 1G-I, pl. 4, figs. 26–33; sublittoral in mud, brackish Lake Hinuma, Ibaraki Prefecture. Iwata, 1973: 264. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 43.
Genus Sacconemertopsis Iwata, 1970
Sacconemertopsis Iwata, 1970a: 142.
TYPE SPECIES: Sacconemertopsis olivifera Iwata, 1970 by original designation.
Sacconemertopsis olivifera Iwata, 1970 [Japanese name: hime-kisui-himomushi]
Sacconemertopsis olivifera Iwata, 1970a: 143–147, fig. 1D-F, pl. 3, figs. 18–25; sublittoral in mud, brackish Lake Hinuma, Ibaraki Prefecture. Iwata, 1973: 264. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 43.
Genus Tetrastemma Ehrenberg, 1831
Tetrastemma Ehrenberg, 1831: 61.
TYPE SPECIES: Tetrastemma flavidum Ehrenberg, 1831, by monotypic designation.
Tetrastemma candidum (Müller, 1774)
Tetrastemma candidum: Iwata, 1954a: 35–36; lower intertidal among algae, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 72. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 36, 41.
NOTE: Originally described as Fasciola candida Müller, 1774 from Norway, this species was transferred to Tetrastemma by Örsted (1844: 88). The species has a circumpolar distribution in the northern hemisphere (British Isles, coasts of Scandinavia, North Sea, Mediterranean, Madeira, Faroe Islands, Iceland, Greenland, Caribbean, Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America) (Gibson, 1995: 372).
Tetrastemma insolens Iwata, 1952
Tetrastemma insolens Iwata, 1952: 146–147, figs. 17, 18; intertidal under stones, Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture and Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 36, 41.
Tetrastemma melanocephalum (Johnston, 1837)
Tetrastemma melanocephalum: Yamaoka, 2005: 153, pl. 1, fig. 5, pl. 2, fig. 5, text fig. 9a–c; intertidal under stones and among algal holdfasts, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture. NOTE: Tetrastemma melanocephalum was originally described as Nemertes melanocephala by Johnston (1837). The species is reported from west coast of Sweden, Baltic Sea coasts of Germany, Denmark, British Isles, Meditteranean, Adriatic and Black Sea coasts, northern Spain, Madeira, and the Canary Islands (Gibson, 1995).
Tetrastemma pinnatum Iwata, 1954
Tetrastemma pinnatum Iwata, 1954a: 34–35, fig. 9C; sublittoral among algae about 4 m deep, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada 1955: 72. Uchida et al. 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 21, 29, 37, 42.
Tetrastemma pseudocoronatum Chernyshev, 1998
Prostoma coronatum: Yamaoka 1940a: 247–249, pl. XVI, figs. 12, 13, text fig. 25; lower intertidal on stones, Akkeshi and Abashiri, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
Tetrastemma coronatum: Iwata, 1954a: 32; lower intertidal, under stones and among algae, Akkeshi and Abashiri, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 72. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Shimomura et al., 2001: 47; intertidal, coarse sand, Akahama, Ôtsuchi Bay, Iwate Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 36, 41.
Tetrastemma pseudocoronatum: Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 21, 29, 37, 42.
NOTE: Tetrastemma coronatum was originally described as Polia coronata from Bréhat, France, by Quatrefages (1846: 213) and was later transferred to Tetrastemma by Hubrecht (1879: 228). Gibson (1995: 478) stated that the species has been reported from the British Isles, Scandinavia, the Atlantic coast of France, the Mediterranean, the Adriatic and Black Seas, and Madeira, but questioned the validity of the records by Yamaoka (1940a) and Iwata (1954a). Chernyshev (1998) described Tetrastemma pseudocoronatum based upon material obtained from Kunashiri Island and regarded Prostoma coronatum sensu Yamaoka (1940a) as conspecific.
Tetrastemma roseocephalum (Yamaoka, 1947)
Prostoma roseocephalum Yamaoka, 1947: 1469, fig. 4141 (1–4); under stones and among algal holdfasts; Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
Tetrastemma roseocephalum: Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 400; figs. a–d. Crandall et al., 2001: 180, pl. 1, figs. 11–14, pl. 2, figs. 17, 17a. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 22, 29, 37, 42. Yamaoka, 2005: 155.
NOTE: Tetrastemma roseocephalum is potentially a junior synonym of Tetrastemma stigmatum. See NOTE under Tetrastemma yamaokai.
Tetrastemma stigmatum Stimpson, 1857
Tetrastemma stigmatum Stimpson, 1857: 163; sublittoral, under stones or among algae at a depth of about 11 m, Hakodate, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 22, 29, 37, 42.
NOTE: Tetrastemma stigmatum is potentially a senior synonym of the two nominal species Prostoma roseocephalum and Tetrastemma yamaokai. See NOTE for Tetrastemma yamaokai.
Tetrastemma verinigrum Iwata, 1954
Tetrastemma verinigrum Iwata, 1954a: 32–33, fig. 9A; intertidal among algal holdfasts, Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 72. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 22, 30, 31, 37, 42.
Tetrastemma verinigrum var. meridianum Iwata, 1954b: 41, fig. 2C; lower intertidal under stones, Kushimoto, Wakayama Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 22, 30, 37, 42.
NOTE: Apart from the records from Japanese waters, Tetrastemma verinigrum is also known from Hong Kong (Gibson, 1990a).
Tetrastemma yamaokai Iwata, 1954 [saninuri-himomushi]
Tetrastemma yamaokai Iwata, 1954a: 33, fig. 9B; Oshoro, Hokkaidô Prefecture, intertidal among algal holdfasts. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 72. Okada et al., 1971: 63. Uchida et al., 1972: 62. Crandall et al., 2002: 15, 22, 30, 37, 42.
NOTE: Judging from the original description of Tetrastemma yamaokai Iwata, 1954, the taxonomic identity of this species can be regarded to be encompassed by that of Tetrastemma roseocephalum Yamaoka, 1947; thus the former name may possibly be a junior synonym of the latter. Tetrastemma stigmatum Stimpson, 1857 was regarded by Chernyshev (1992) as a nomen dubium, but Stimpson's (1857) original description contains such important taxonomic characters for identifying tetrastemmatids as the coloration of the body and cephalic patch. These character states in Tetrastemma stigmatum Stimpson, 1857 also apply to Tetrastemma yamaokai Iwata, 1954 and Tetrastemma roseocephalum Yamaoka, 1947. These might be synonymized by future studies.
Subclass POLYSTILIFERA Brinkmann, 1917
Order REPTANTIA Brinkmann, 1917
Family DREPANOPHORIDAE Verrill, 1892
Genus Drepanophorus Hubrecht, 1874
Drepanophorus Hubrecht, 1874: 42.
TYPE SPECIES: Drepanophorus rubrostriatus Hubrecht, 1874 by subsequent designation of Gibson (1995: 360).
Drepanophorus longiceps Iwata, 1957 [Japanese name: mikado-himomushi or tsurugi-himomushi]
Drepanophorus longiceps Iwata, 1957a: 27–30, pl. I, fig. 15, pl. VI, figs. 9, 10, pl. VII, figs. 1–8; dredged from a depth of 50 m on 7 November 1954 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 17. Iwata, 1965a: 216. Iwata, 1965b: 401, figs. a, b. Iwata, 1992: 199, fig. 7–5B.
Hirohitonemertes longiceps [nomen nudum]: Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 22, 27, 39.
Genus Kameginemertes Iwata, 1998
Kameginemertes Iwata, 1998: 199.
TYPE SPECIES: Amphiporus parmiornatus Iwata, 1957 by original designation.
Kameginemertes parmiornata (Iwata, 1957)
Amphiporus parmiornatus Iwata, 1957a: 24–25, pl. I, fig. 12, pl. VI, fig. 6; dredged from 50–55m depth on 6 December 1951 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, “Kamejyo” [sic], Sagami Bay, off Kanagawa Prefecture.
Kameginemertes parmiornatus Iwata, 1998: 199–213, figs. 1–9.
Kameginemertes parmiornata: Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 22, 27, 39.
NOTE: Iwata (1998) redescribed Amphiporus parmiornatus Iwata, 1957 based on the original material, establishing a new genus; in his 1998 paper, the locality is noted as “On off-shore reef at Kamegisho, near Nagai.”
Family SAGAMINEMERTIDAE Chernyshev, 2003
Genus Sagaminemertes Friedrich, 1968
Sagaminemertes Friedrich, 1968: 34.
TYPE SPECIES: Amphiporus nagaiensis Iwata, 1957 by monotypic designation.
Sagaminemertes nagaiensis (Iwata, 1957) [Japanese name: nagai-himomushi]
Amphiporus nagaiensis Iwata, 1957a: 23–24, pl. I, fig. 11, pl. VI, figs. 6, 7; dredged sublittorally from 100–130 m depth on 7 August 1950 by His Majesty Emperor Shôwa, northern Nakafukari near Nagai, Sagami Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture.
Sagaminemertes nagaiensis Iwata, 1988: 115–123, figs. 1–7; Iwata, 1992: 199, fig. 7–5A. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 22, 29, 41.
NOTE: Iwata (1988) redescribed Amphiporus nagaiensis Iwata, 1957 based on the original material, establishing a new genus. Iwata (1988) indicated the depth as 100–110 m, whereas Iwata (1957) gave it as 100–130 m.
Order PELAGICA Brinkmann, 1917
Family NECTONEMERTIDAE Verrill, 1892
Genus Nectonemertes Verrill, 1892
Nectonemertes Verrill, 1892: 447.
TYPE SPECIES: Nectonemertes mirabilis Verrill, 1892 by monotypic designation.
Nectonemertes japonica Foshay, 1912 [Japanese name: hoso-oyogi-himomushi]
Nectonemertes japonica Foshay, 1912: 50–53, fig. 1; off Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture, “taken in the vicinity of Misaki…, but no depth is recorded.” Crandall et al., 2002: 12, 22, 28, 31, 42.
Nectonemertes mirabilis: Komai, 1919: 295, fig. 2. Kato, 1947: 1469, fig. 4143. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.9. Kato and Iwata, 1965: 401; with one figure. Shiino, 1969: 94, fig. 9–3E. Iwata, 1992: 201, fig. 7–4E. Iwata, 1997: 55.
NOTE: Brinkmann (1917: 9) synonymized Nectonemertes japonica Foshay, 1912 with Nectonemertes mirabilis Verrill, 1892. Coe (1926: 174) proposed separating these species, but later synonymized Nectonemertes japonica with Nectonemertes mirabilis (Coe, 1954: 259). Korotkevitsch (1955: 72, 81–82; 1977: 17) retained Nectonemertes japonica under its original name. Gibson (1995: 425) listed Nectonemertes japonica as a valid species name. Future studies must settle the problem of which name should be applied to the Japanese species. Nectonemertes mirabilis was originally described from the Atlantic, but is known to be distributed in the North, equatorial and South Atlantic and North Pacific (Gibson, 1995: 426), while Nectonemertes japonica is only known from Japanese waters.
Family PELAGONEMERTIDAE Moseley, 1875
Genus Pelagonemertes Moseley, 1875
Pelagonemertes Moseley, 1875a: 168.
TYPE SPECIES: Pelagonemertes rollestoni Moseley, 1875 by monotypic designation.
Pelagonemertes moseleyi Bürger, 1895 [Japanese name: oyogi-himomushi]
Pelagonemertes rollestoni Moseley, 1875b: 377–383, pl. XI, figs. 1–5; trawled from 420–755 fathoms by H.M.S. Challenger on 5 June 1875, obtained by Willemoes-Suhm, 34°58′N, 139°30′E, about halfway between Ôshima (the Metropolis of Tôkyô) and Cape Sagami (Kanagawa Prefecture).
Pelagonemertes moseleyi: Komai, 1919: 294, fig. 1. Kato and Tanaka, 1938: 595–598, pl. XL, figs. A–F, text figs. 1 and 2; “In the middle of November, 1937, one of the writers, Otohiko Tanaka, obtained several specimens of pelagic nemertean along with a large number of deep-sea medusae, copepods, arrow-worms, etc., by the vertical net from about 1,000 meters to the surface, at a station 3 miles off Hasima in Sagami Bay.” Kato, 1940: 101, two figs. Kato, 1947: 1470, fig. 4144. Iwata, 1960c: 169; pl. 84, fig. 18. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.8. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 217. Kato and Iwata, 1965: 401, one figure. Iwata, 1992: 201, fig. 7–4F. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 22, 29, 32.
NOTE: Pelagonemertes moseleyi was first reported by Moseley (1875b) as a young individual of Pelagonemertes rollestoni, which was also obtained during the scientific cruise of H.M.S. Challenger (Moseley, 1875a). Later, Bürger (1895: 596) regarded the former as different from the latter and gave it a new name, Pelagonemertes moseleyi; this species has been found in the North and tropical Atlantic and the North Pacific (Gibson, 1995: 463).
Records for Which Application of the Species Name is Doubtful
Class PALAEONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
Family CEPHALOTRICHIDAE McIntosh, 1874
Cephalothrix filiformis (Johnston, 1829) [Japanese name: daikoku-hoso-himomushi]
Procephalothrix filiformis: Iwata, 1954a: 7, fig. 1B, D; under stones near the low-water level on a stony beach, Daikokujima Island, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 65. Iwata, 1960b: 14–18, figs. 46–61; intertidal, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1983: 181, 182, 188, fig. 8–5d, e, f. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 16, 29, 36, 41. Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003: 409; Akkeshi Bay, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
NOTE: Cephalothrix filiformis was originally described as Planaria filiformis by Johnston (1828) from the British Isles. Johnston's type material is presumably not extant. The taxonomic identity of Cephalothrix filiformis sensu Iwata (1954a) requires further investigation, since the occurrence in Japanese waters is quite outside the range of this species based on other records from the British Isles, the coast of France, and northern Spain (Gibson, 1994: 60, 1995: 467).
Cephalothrix linearis (Rathke, 1799) [Japanese name: hoso-himomushi]
Cephalothrix linearis: Takakura, 1898: 119, fig. 4; intertidal among Sargassum thunbergii, Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture. Kaburaki, 1927: 1662, fig. 3181. Kaburaki, 1947: 1474, fig. 4156. Iwata, 1951: 135; habitat not recorded, Onomichi, Hiroshima Prefecture. Iwata, 1952: 132; intertidal under stones, Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture and Fukue, Gotô Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. Yamaoka, 1940a: 215, pl. XIV, figs. 5–8, text figs. 5, 6; under stones on sandy beach near high-water level, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Utinomi, 1956: 31, pl. 16, fig. 2. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 4. Utinomi, 1960: 31, pl. 16, fig. 2. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.2. Inaba, 1963: 227; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral under stones on rocky to gravelly shores; commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Iwata, 1965a: 169. Kaburaki and Iwata, 1965: 390, figs. 1a, b. Utinomi, 1969: 31, pl. 16, fig. 2. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 14; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Inaba, 1988: 225; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral under stones on rocky to gravelly shores; commonly found in the Inland Sea of Seto. Ali et al., 1990: 1083; intertidal, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture, identified by Dr. Minoru Imajima. Noguchi et al., 1991: 846; Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture. Iwata, 1992: 195, fig. 7–3A. Asakawa et al., 2000: 764; among shells of the oyster, Crassostrea gigas, Hiroshima Bay, Hiroshima Prefecture, identified by Prof. Iwata. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 16, 24, 26, 33, 38.
Procephalothrix simulus [sic]: Iwata, 1954a: 6, fig. 1A; under stones or among laminarian holdfasts, Hokkaidô Prefecture (Akkeshi, Muroran, Hiroo, Nemuro and Oshoro). Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 65. Iwata, 1957c: 108. Iwata, 1960a: 96, fig. 1. Iwata, 1960b: 3–14, figs. 1–45; intertidal, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 5. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965a: 169, 201. Iwata, 1965b: 390, figs. a, b. Okada et al., 1971: 62. Honma and Kitami, 1978: 14; Sado Island, Nîgata Prefecture. Iwata, 1983: 181, 182, 193, figs. 8–5a, b, c, 8–13a. Iwata, 1992: 196. Iwata, 1997: 55. Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003: 409; Akkeshi Bay, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
Procephalothrix similus [sic]: Uchida et al., 1972: 62.
Procephalothrix simula: Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 16, 29, 36, 41.
Cephalothrix sp. Asakawa et al., 2003: 748; among shells of the oyster, Crassostrea gigas, Hiroshima Bay, Hiroshima Prefecture. Tanu et al., 2004: 516; Hiroshima Bay, Hiroshima Prefecture.
NOTE: Cephalothrix linearis was originally described as Planaria linearis by Rathke (1799) from the North Sea coast of Denmark, based on two specimens. The original description was so brief and uninformative that Jensen (1878) even suspected that Rathke's two specimens represented two different species. Because of the vagueness of the taxonomic identity of this species, determining whether or not the Japanese population identified as C. linearis can be included in the same species will require further investigation. Comparative toxicological (Dr. Manabu Asakawa, unpublished) and molecular (Kajihara, unpublished) data from Hiroshima Bay, Ôtsuchi Bay, and Akkeshi Bay indicate that the species previously recorded as Cephalothrix linearis from Japanese waters appears to be conspecific with Cephalothrix simula sensu Iwata (1954a). The species possesses strong toxicity due to a high concentration of tetrodotoxin and/or related chemicals (Ali et al., 1990; Asakawa et al., 2000, 2003). Possible nominal species contained in this taxon include Procephalothrix fasciculus Iwata, 1952 and Procephalothrix arenaria Gibson, 1990.
Class PILIDIOPHORA Thollesson and Norenburg, 2003
Family LINEIDAE McIntosh, 1874
Cerebratulus fuscus (McIntosh, 1874)
Cerebratulus fuscus: Takakura, 1898: 426–427, fig. 24; on the surfaces of rocks obtained sublittorally from a depth of several fathoms on a muddy sand substrate, Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture. Crandall et al., 2002: 10, 17, 27, 38.
NOTE: Cerebratulus fuscus was originally described as Micrura fusca by McIntosh (1873–1874) from the British Isles and later transferred to Cerebratulus by Hubrecht (1879: 219). The species is distributed in European waters, including the Mediterranean (Gibson, 1994: 78). Records from North American and Greenland are related to Cerebratulus marginatus Renier, 1804 (Coe, 1940: 276, 1943: 255). Gibson (1995: 417) doubted the validity of Wheeler's (1934: 232, 1940: 32) records from South Africa. Takakura's (1898) record of C. fuscus from Japan is based on external characters and thus requires further investigation.
Lineus vegetus Coe, 1931
Lineus cf. vetatus [sic]: Inaba, 1988: 225; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, sandy to muddy sediment; a specimen collected on May 1976 in Bizen, Okayama Prefecture, is deposited in Mukaishima Marine Biological Station, Hiroshima University.
Lineus vegetus: Iwata, 1997: 53, species name appearing as the caption of a color photograph taken by Fumio Iwata, locality not indicated.
NOTE: Lineus vegetus was originally described by Coe (1931) from California, USA, as possessing a strong capacity for regeneration. It was later synonymized with the nominal species Ramphogordius sanguineus Rathke, 1799 by Riser (1994), who established a new genus Myoisophagos to accommodate the species, along with the two nominal species Planaria sanguinea Rathke, 1799 and Lineus pseudolacteus Gontcharoff, 1951. However, as the genus Myoisophagos Riser, 1994 constitutes a junior synonym of Ramphogordius Rathke, 1843, the species should now called Ramphogordius sanguineus Rathke, 1799 (Riser, 1998). There is no taxonomic account of any material of this species from Japanese waters, and the use of the species name by Inaba (1988) and Iwata (1997) should be regarded as questionable.
Lineus bilineatus (Renier, 1804) sensu Iwata (1954a) [Japanese name: hutasuji-himomushi]
Lineus bilineatus: Iwata, 1954a: 9–10, fig. 2A; lower intertidal under stones, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 65, fig. 17–1. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Iwata, 1965b: 393, figs. a–c. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 17, 27, 34, 39.
NOTE: Lineus bilineatus, originally described as Cerebratulus bilineatus Renier, 1804 from the Adriatic Sea (presumably near Padua), has a color pattern and number of eyes different from the Japanese form identified under this name (Gibson, 1995: 330–331).
Lineus gesserensis (Müller, 1774) sensu Takakura, 1898
Lineus gesserensis: Takakura, 1898: 335, fig. 17; intertidal among algae, Koajiro Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture.
NOTE: Lineus gesserensis, originally described by Müller (1788: 32) as Planaria gesserensis from Denmark, was subsequently synonymized with Lineus ruber (Müller, 1774) by Bürger (1904: 101). However, Gibson (1982a: 90; 1994: 94) noted that forms identified as Lineus gesserensis also contain what should now be referred to as Lineus viridis (Müller, 1774). Takakura's (1898) description of the external features of what he called Lineus gesserensis equally applies to both Lineus ruber and Lineus viridis, so the identity of Takakura's material cannot be determined. Lineus ruber and Lineus viridis were recently transferred to the genus Poseidon Girard, 1852 by Chernyshev (2004c).
Lineus grubei (Hubrecht, 1879) sensu Takakura, 1898
Lineus grubei: Takakura, 1898: 331–332, fig. 11; among algae from 2–3 fathoms depth, Misaki and Jôgashima, Kanagawa Prefecture.
NOTE: Originally reported from Naples as Cerebratulus grubei by Hubrecht (1879: 215–126), this species was transferred to Lineus by Bürger (1892: 160). Gibson (1995: 335) stated that Takakura's (1898) report of this species from Japan “cannot be substantiated.”
Lineus longifissus (Hubrecht, 1887) sensu Takakura (1898) and Iwata (1952) [Japanese name: murasaki-himomushi]
Lineus longifissus: Takakura, 1898: 336, fig. 19; obtained sublittorally from muddy sediment, Moroiso Bay, Kanagawa Prefecture. Iwata, 1952: 137–138; collected sublittorally among sandy mud at 30 cm depth; Tomioka, Amakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture. Iwata, 1960c: 166, pl. 83, fig. 12. Iwata, 1965b: 394, one figure. Saito and Suzuki, 1974: 38; intertidal, Niisaki Beach, Kanagawa Prefecture; identified by Dr. Iwata. Crandall et al., 2002: 11, 18, 27, 34, 39.
NOTE: Lineus longifissus was originally described as Cerebratulus longifissus Hubrecht, 1887, based on material from Marion Island, South Africa obtained during the cruise of H.M.S Challenger. It was later transferred to Lineus by Wheeler (1934: 255), and more recenlty to Heteronemertes by Chernyshev (1995: 15). Lineus longifissus differs from Takakura's (1898) and Iwata's (1952) descriptions in the degree of posterior extension of the lateral cephalic grooves; the Japanese form belongs to a different species and will be given a different name when it is redescribed.
Lineus mcintoshii (Langerhans, 1880) sensu Takakura (1898)
Lineus Mcdntoshii [sic]: Takakura, 1898: 187, fig. 10; intertidal, Koajiro, Kanagawa Prefecture.
NOTE: Collected among algae on a rocky shore in Madeira and originally described as Cerebratulus mcintoshii by Langerhans (1880), this species was later transferred to Lineus by Bürger (1904: 95). It appears to differ from Takakura's (1898) material in the color pattern of the cephalic region. The taxon recognized by Takakura (1898) must be given a different name when additional material has been found and redescribed.
Class HOPLONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
Subclass MONOSTILIFERA Brinkmann, 1917
Family AMPHIPORIDAE McIntosh, 1874
Amphiporus cervicalis (Stimpson, 1857) [Japanese name: yajirobei-himomushi]
Polina cervicalis Stimpson, 1857: 165; intertidal under stones, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture; transferred to Amphiporus by Bürger (1904: 39).
Amphiporus cervicalis: Iwata, 1954a: 25–26; intertidal among mussels, Muroran and Rishiri Island, Hokkaidô Prefecture; intertidal among mussels, Kominato, Chiba Prefecture; intertidal among mussels, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 70. Utinomi, 1956: 32, pl. 16, fig. 13. Iwata, 1960c: 169, pl. 84, fig. 15; habitat not recorded, Asamushi, Aomori Prefecture; habitat not recorded, Cape Muroto, Kôchi Prefecture. Utinomi, 1960: 32, pl. 16, fig. 13. Iwata, 1965a: 217. Okuda and Iwata, 1965: 399, figs. a–c. Shiino, 1969: 94. Utinomi, 1969: 32, pl. 16, fig. 13. Tsuchiya, 1979: 82; intertidal, Hadakajima Island, Asamushi, and Aomori Harbor, Aomori Prefecture. Uchida et al. 1972: 55; habitat not recorded, Horomui, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Iwata 1992: 202, pl. 44–8. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 25, 33.
Amphiporus cervicaris [sic]: Inaba, 1988: 226; lower intertidal to shallow sublittoral, on algae or under stones on gravelly to rocky shores; a specimen collected 18 July 1977 at Shijûshima, Hiroshima Prefecture, is deposited in Mukaishima Marine Biological Station, Hiroshima University.
NOTE: The original description of Polina cervicalis contains little information about the arrangement of the ocelli, and the description can be applied as well to the conditions in both Amphiporus formidabilis Griffin, 1898 and A. imparispinosus Griffin, 1898. Records of nemerteans under the name Amphiporus cervicalis from Japanese waters probably represent either A. formidabilis or A. imparispinosus, or even another taxon.
Amphiporus depressus (Stimpson, 1857)
Tatsnoskia depressa Stimpson, 1857: 165; sublittoral on sandy bottom at a depth of about 3–5 m, Hakodate, Hokkaidô Prefecture; originally recorded as “In portu ‘Hakodadi’ insulae ‘Jesso;’ in fundo arenoso, e 6–10 org. profundo accepta”; transferred to Amphiporus by Bürger (1904: 44).
Amphiporus depressus: Iwata, 1954a: 19–21, fig. 5C; lower intertidal under stones, Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 69. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33, 37.
NOTE: Gibson and Crandall (1989: 458) regarded Amphiporus depressus sensu Stimpson (1857) as a nomen dubium, but Amphiporus depressus sensu Iwata (1954a) as a different taxon. The illustration of Iwata's (1954a) taxon resembles Amphiporus imparispinosus.
Amphiporus lactifloreus (Johnston, 1828)
Amphiporus lactifloreus: Iwata, 1954a: 23–24; intertidal under stones, Akkeshi and Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 70. Uchida et al., 1963: 17. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33, 38.
NOTE: Amphiporus lactifloreus was originally described from the British Isles as Planaria lactiflorea by Johnston (1828: 489). Gibson (1995: 469) questioned the conspecificity between Iwata's material and Johnston's taxon. Iwata's (1954a) taxon may represent Amphiporus imparispinosus.
Family CRATENEMERTIDAE
Nipponnemertes pulchra (Johnston, 1837)
Nipponnemertes pulchra: Yamaoka, 2005: 147, pl. 2, fig. 2, text fig. 5a–d; subtidal, 50 m depth, muddy sediment, off Kawazu, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture; habitat not recorded, Hashima Island, near Itô, Shizuoka Prefecture.
NOTE: Nipponnemertes pulchra was originally described as Nemertes pulchra from Berwickshire, UK, by Johnston (1837: 536). The species has been reported in the northern hemisphere from the east coast of North America, Greenland, the Faroe Islands, the White Sea, and northern Europe from the Atlantic coast of France to Scandinavia; also reported in the southern hemisphere from Chile, South Africa, and Antarctica (Gibson, 1995). Yamaoka's (2005) material differs from the other records of N. pulchra in possessing a white head, and probably represents a different species.
Family TETRASTEMMATIDAE Hubrecht, 1879
Oerstedia venusta Iwata, 1954 [Japanese name: hime-himomushi]
Oerstedia venusta Iwata, 1954a: 15–16, fig. 3; intertidal among algal holdfasts, Muroran and Rishiri Island, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 68. Iwata, 1965b: 398, figs. a–f. Crandall et al., 2002: 13, 20, 28, 35, 40.
NOTE: Envall and Sundberg (1993: 313) stated, “It is not possible from the brief description of this species to identify it to the genus Oerstedia.” Gibson (1995: 447) regarded the name Oerstedia venusta as a nomen dubium.
Prostoma graecense (Bömig, 1892) [Japanese name: mamizu-himomushi]
Prostoma graecense: Ishizuka, 1933: 215–218, figs. A, B; paddy fields and ponds, especially in chalybeate water, Sapporo, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Sudzuki, 1953: 218; in paddy fields around Urawa, Saitama Prefecture; in paddy fields around Sugashima, Mie Prefecture. Iwata, 1954a: 29. Iwata, 1970b: 128, fig. 91; Urawa, Saitama Prefecture. Iwata, 1973: 262. Iwata, 1992: 203, fig. 7–5G; Sapporo, Urawa, Sugashima.
Prostoma hokkaidoensis [sic] Stiasny-Wijnhoff, 1938: 222.
Prostoma lacstre [sic]: Sudzuki, 1953: 218; habitat not recorded, Sapporo, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
Prostoma graecens [sic]: Iwata, 1965a: 217; Urawa, Saitama Prefecture; Sapporo, Hokkaidô Prefecture.
Prostoma gracense [sic]: Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 43.
Prostoma hokkaidoense: Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 43.
NOTE: Ishizuka (1933) identified his material from Sapporo as Prostoma graecense (type locality: a local botanic garden in Graz, Austria). Stiasny-Wijnhoff (1938) created a new name, Prostoma hokkaidoense, to refer to the Sapporo form, attributing the naming authority to Ishizuka. Sudzuki (1953) regarded the Sapporo form as Prostoma lacustre (du Plessis, 1892) (type locality: under pebbles on a beach of Lac Léman at Anière, near Genéve, Switzerland), while he identified the form from Urawa and Sugashima as Prostoma graecense (Bömig, 1892). Iwata (1954a) listed Prostoma hokkaidoense and Prostoma lacustre sensu Sudzuki (1953) as synonymous with Prostoma graecense. Chernyshev et al. (1998: 62) argued that since previous records of Prostoma from Japan lack histological information about internal morphology, the specimens involved cannot be identified with certainty, and concluded that “all previous records of Prostoma from Japan should be cited as Prostoma sp. (or spp.?).”
Prostoma grande (Ikeda, 1913) [Japanese name: mimizu-himomushi]
Stichostemma grandis Ikeda, 1913:239–256, pl. IV, figs. 1–5; a vessel planted with the aquatic plant Lisichiton kamtschatense Schott in the Botanic Garden of the Hiroshima Normal School, Hiroshima Prefecture. Iwata, 1957c: 101.
Prostoma grandis: Kaburaki, 1927: 1663, fig. 3183. Miyashita, 1932: 328; among Potamogeton cristatus covering the bottom of a small river, Setagaya, the Metropolis of Tôkyô. Kaburaki, 1947: 1468, fig. 4140. Satô and Itô, 1961: 187, fig. 7.1.10. Iwata, 1965a: 217. Kaburaki and Iwata, 1965: 400, figs. a, b. Iwata, 1973: 262. Iwata, 1983: 181.
Prossoma grandis [sic]: Okugawa, 1932: 70; in paddy fields over much of Japan, including Hokkaidô, but excepting Kyushu and Shikoku.
Prostoma lubricoideum [sic]: Sudzuki, 1953: 217–218.
Prostoma grande: Kawakatsu et al., 1989: 47. Crandall et al., 2002: 14, 21, 29, 43.
NOTE: Described from Hiroshima by Ikeda (1913), Prostoma grande has been widely reported from Japan by various authors. Sudzuki (1953) regarded Prostoma grande (Ikeda, 1913) as synonymous with Prostoma lombricoideum Dugès, 1830 (type locality: Montpellier [?], France). The comments of Chernyshev et al. (1998: 62) above (see ‘NOTE’ under Prostoma graecense) equally apply to Prostoma grande. Chernyshev et al. (1998: 62) further commented, “Future taxonomic studies on the comparative morphology and histology of Prostoma samples from elsewhere in Japan, including the type localities of the nominal species P. grande and P. hokkaidoense, are necessary.”
Species That Cannot With Certainty Be Assigned to Valid Genera
Cosmocephala japonica Stimpson, 1857
Cosmocephala japonica Stimpson, 1857: 165; intertidal under stones and in rock crevices, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
?Amphiporus angulatus [in part]: Coe, 1944: 30. Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 24, 33, 37.
Amphiporus japonicus: Crandall et al., 2002: 9, 19, 26, 33.
NOTE: Bürger (1904: 48) regarded this form as a subspecific taxon, Amphiporus angulatus japonicus. Iwata (1952: 144) mentioned the similarity between the cephalic marking of Amphiporus angulatus japonicus and those of Amphiporus punctatulus Coe, 1905 (now Nipponnemertes punctatula); the former, having a uniform dorsal body coloration, can be differentiated from the latter, in which the dorsal coloration is mottled. Gibson and Crandall (1989: 460) regarded Amphiporus japonicus as a nomen dubium. The external appearance of a specimen I recently collected in Hiroshima Bay agrees with the original description of this species, but also resembles that of the Nipponnemertes species. This might mean that Cosmocephala is a senior synonym of Nipponnemertes, which must be determined by future studies. If this proves to be the case, however, the nomenclature of Cratenemertidae will have to be altered to a large extent.
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: Stimpson (1857) gave the following diagnosis: “Corpus subelongatum, utrinque obtusum; lateribus in extentione fere parallelis. Color supra brunnea, subtus alba; caput linea mediana et maculis minutis irregularibus incoloratis; fronte, et maculis cervicalibut triangularibus, albis. Caput breve subdiscretum fronte rotundata, ad aperturam profunde fissa. Cervix utrinque pseudorima obliqua, antrorsum curvata. Ocelli sat magni, in capitis marginibus antero-lateralibus, utrinque 10–15. Long. 4; lat. 0.18 poll.” [Free translation: Body somewhat elongated, sometimes blunt; when extended the lateral margins are parallel. Dorsally brown, ventrally white; head with a white median line and irregularly-shaped small white dots; anterior end of the head and triangle-shaped neck spots are white. Head wide, somewhat discrete, anteriorly rounded, deeply splits toward proboscis pore. Neck on each side with pseudo-crevices antero-obliquely curved. Eyes sufficiently large, arranged on the antero-lateral margins of the head, 10–15 on each side. 10 cm long, 4.5 mm wide.].
Dicelis rubra Stimpson, 1857
Dicelis rubra Stimpson, 1857: 164; sublittoral, between barnacles and sponges at a depth of about 7–8 m, Tanegashima, Kagoshima Prefecture.
NOTE: Bürger (1904) included this species in a group of dubious nemertean taxa. Gibson (1995) regarded the name as invalid.
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: Stimpson (1857: 164) gave the following diagnosis for the genus Dicelis: “Corpus lineare, depressiusculum, utrinque obtusum. Caput continuum vel subdiscretum, fronte emarginata, apertura proboscidis terminali. Ocelli duo simplices, rotundati, subterminales. Maricolae.” [Free translation: Body filiform, dorsoventrally flattened, blunt on both ends. Head continuous to, or somewhat discrete from, body; frontally convex, proboscis pore terminal. Two rounded eyes subterminally. Marine.]. The diagnosis for the species was given as: “Subfiliformis, depressiuscula, antice subattenuata; colore rubra vel purpurea. Cervix quam caput vix angustior. Caput antice rotundata et emarginata. Ocelli duo parvi subterminales. Long. 1.5; lat. 1.03 [sic. probably 0.03] poll.” [Free translation: somewhat filiform, dorsoventrally flattened, anteriorly somewhat tapered; red or purple in color. Neck hardly narrower than head. Head anteriorly rounded and convex. Two eyes slightly subterminally. 3.75 cm long, 0.75 mm wide.].
Dichilus obscurus Stimpson, 1857
Dichilus obscurus Stimpson, 1857: 163; intertidal between stones, Amamiôshima, Kagoshima Prefecture; originally recorded as “In portu insulae ‘Ousima;’ littoralis inter lapillus.”
NOTE: Bürger (1904) included this species in a group of dubious nemertean taxa. Gibson (1995) regarded the name as invalid.
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: Stimpson (1857: 163) gave the following diagnosis for the genus Dichilus: “Corpus lineare depressum, longitudine mediocre. Caput corpori continuum subquadratum, plica transversa terminali bilabiatum; labio inferiore emarginato. Ocelli duo subterminales. Cervix supra rimis obsoletis (pseudorimis) impressa. Maricolae.” [Free translation: head somewhat rectangular, continuous to body, transverse fold terminally bilobed; lower lip concave. Two ocelli subterminally. Neck dorsally with pseudo-crevices. Marine.]. The diagnosis for the species is given as: “Corpus supra pallide rubro-fulvum, maculis duabus oblongis in capite. Ocelli fusci, sat magni, subdistantes, in maculis siti. Pseudorimae cervicales tres; una mediana longitudinalis, ex cujus media aliae versus merginem utrinque oblique extendunt. Long. 3; lat. 0.08 poll.” [Free translation: Body dorsally pale reddish brown, with two oblong cephalic patches. Ocelli brown, large, rather separately situated in the cephalic patch. Three pseudo-crevices on neck; one mediologitudinal, from which other median ones extend obliquely towards the margins respectively. 7.5 cm long, 2mm wide.].
Diplomma serpentina (Stimpson, 1855)
Nareda serpentina Stimpson, 1855: 381; habitat not recorded, Okinawa Prefecture.
Diplomma serpentina: Stimpson, 1857: 164; intertidal under stones on muddy sand, Okinawa Prefecture.
NOTE: Bürger (1904) included this species in a group of dubious nemertean taxa. Gibson (1995) regarded the name as invalid. It appears that Diplomma serpentina is conspecific with Amphiporus insolitus Iwata, 1954 and Paranemertes sp. sensu Yamaoka (2005). The identity of this taxon should be clarified by future studies.
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: “Elongated, somewhat flattened, brownish; head broader than the body, emarginate in front; neck well contracted; eyes two, rather large, bilobate, placed one on each side at the middle of the head. Length 2 1/2 inches” (Stimpson, 1855: 381).
Records of Specimens Not Identified to Species
Class PALAEONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
Family TUBULANIDAE Bürger, 1904 (1874)
Carinella sp.
Carinella sp. Takakura, 1898: 119; Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture.
NOTE: The genus Carinella Johnston, 1833 was synonymized with Tubulanus Renier, 1804, by Bürger (1904). This form differs from Tubulanus punctatus (Takakura, 1898) in possessing continuous longitudinal stripes on the mid-dorsal and lateral surfaces of the body.
Class HOPLONEMERTEA Hubrecht, 1879
Subclass MONOSTILIFERA Brinkmann, 1917
Family AMPHIPORIDAE McIntosh, 1874
Amphiporus sp.
Amphiporus sp. Yamaoka, 2005: 147, pl. 1, fig. 3; text fig. 4b, c; among shelly bottom, several meters depth, Susaki, Shizuoka Prefecture.
NOTE: Amphiporus sp. sensu Yamaoka (2005) is well illustrated, which will facilitate identification when this species is again encountered; the external characters of this form include the ovoid-shaped head, the eyes arranged on the edges of the head in front of the anterior cephalic furrows, and the uniformly pinkish-red body coloration. The generic placement of this form may require further assessment based on new material in future studies.
Zygonemertes sp.
Zygonemertes sp. Iwata, 1954a: 19, fig. 5A; under a stone near low tide mark, Muroran, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 69.
NOTE: This form can be identified as a member of the genera Zygonemertes or Pheroneonemertes by possessing post-cerebral ocelli; proper generic identification of this form will require histological examination of its internal morphology. The body is about 3 cm long, 1 mm wide, pale blue in color without any marking. There are short, double longitudinal lines on the mid-dorsal surface of the head (Iwata, 1954a).
Family CRATENEMERTIDAE Friedrich, 1968
Nipponnemertes sp. 1
Nipponnemertes sp. 1. Yamaoka, 2005: 151, pl. 2, fig. 3; text figs. 6b, c, 7; intertidal, under stones, Shitaru, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture; shelly bottom, several meters depth, Susaki, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
NOTE: The form can be identified as Nipponnemertes by the interwoven longitudinal and circular muscle fibers in the rhynchocoel wall. Detailed external features illustrated by Yamaoka (2005) will suffice for identification when this species is again encountered. The body is 2.5 cm long, 0.8 mm wide, yellowish brown in color, rarely with small brown dots; about 15 eyes are irregularly arranged on either side of head. Remarkably, Yamaoka's (2005) specimen possessed only one accessory stylet pouch.
Nipponnemertes sp. 2
Nipponnemertes sp. 2. Yamaoka, 2005: 152, text fig. 8; subtidal, several meters depth, Susaki, Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
NOTE: Yamaoka's (2005) specimens were 10–12 mm long, 0.7 mm wide; anterior cephalic furrows ventrally forming M-shape; posterior cephalic furrows encircling body in esophageal region, curving forward on both dorsal and ventral surfaces; body color pure white, yellowish white, or yellow, with scattered small brown patches. The large cerebral organs extending behind the brain in this form is characteristic of the Cratenemertidae.
Family EMPLECTONEMATIDAE Bürger, 1904
Paranemertes sp.
Paranemertes sp. Yamaoka, 2005: 142, pl. 1, fig. 6; text fig. 1; Itado, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
NOTE: Body 6 cm long, 0.7 mm wide; uniformly bright chestnut-brown in color, except for white margins on cephalic tip. This form may be conspecific with Diplomma serpentina (Stimpson, 1855) and Amphiporus insolitus Iwata, 1954. Future study should clarify the identity of this taxon.
Family TETRASTEMMATIDAE Hubrecht, 1879
Prostoma sp. [Japanese name: toyama-mamizu-himomushi]
Prostoma sp. Iwata, 1997: 53, with two color photographs taken in life by Dr. Fumio Iwata; under stones near a spring in a small pond near a paddy field, Asahi-chô, Toyama Prefecture.
NOTE: The body is about 1 cm long, 0.5 mm wide, pale orange in color. The proboscis retractor muscle is well developed (Iwata, 1997).
Tetrastemma sp.
Tetrastemma sp. Iwata, 1954a: 30, fig. 8A; among seaweeds, Akkeshi, Hokkaidô Prefecture. Yamaguchi and Yamada, 1955: 71, fig.18–1.
NOTE: Body 2 cm long, 1 mm wide, yellowish green in basement body color, with four darker longitudinal stripes on the dorsal surface; with four eyes (Iwata, 1954a).
Tetrastemma sp.
Tetrastemma sp. Yamaoka, 2005: 155, pl. 2, fig. 1, text figs. 9d, e, 10; subtidal, about 5 fathoms deep, Shirahama, near Shimoda, Shizuoka Prefecture.
NOTE: Body 1 cm long, 2 mm wide; dorsally reddish brown, paler ventrally, with dark brown mid-dorsal stripe (Yamaoka, 2005).
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due to Dr. Mark J. Grygier, Lake Biwa Museum, for information about the type specimens of Prostoma ohmiense, and to Dr. Manabu Asakawa, Hiroshima University, for his unpublished toxicological data on nemerteans from some places in Japan. I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Alexei V. Chernyshev (Institute of Marine Biology, Far East Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia), Dr. Frank B. Crandall (Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, USA), Dr. Ray Gibson (Professor Emeritus of Liverpool John Moores University, UK), Dr. Svetlana A. Maslakova (University of Washington, USA), Dr. Jon L. Norenburg (Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, USA) and Dr. Sun Shichun (Mariculture Research Lab, Ocean University of Qingdao, China) for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (research grant numbers 16770059 and 16207005).