Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2011 Color-Pattern Analysis of Eyespots in Butterfly Wings: A Critical Examination of Morphogen Gradient Models
Joji M. Otaki
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Butterfly wing color patterns consist of many color-pattern elements such as eyespots. It is believed that eyespot patterns are determined by a concentration gradient of a single morphogen species released by diffusion from the prospective eyespot focus in conjunction with multiple thresholds in signal-receiving cells. As alternatives to this single-morphogen model, more flexible multiple-morphogen model and induction model can be proposed. However, the relevance of these conceptual models to actual eyespots has not been examined systematically. Here, representative eyespots from nymphalid butterflies were analyzed morphologically to determine if they are consistent with these models. Measurement of ring widths of serial eyespots from a single wing surface showed that the proportion of each ring in an eyespot is quite different among homologous rings of serial eyespots of different sizes. In asymmetric eyespots, each ring is distorted to varying degrees. In extreme cases, only a portion of rings is expressed remotely from the focus. Similarly, there are many eyespots where only certain rings are deleted, added, or expanded. In an unusual case, the central area of an eyespot is composed of multiple “miniature eyespots,” but the overall macroscopic eyespot structure is maintained. These results indicate that each eyespot ring has independence and flexibility to a certain degree, which is less consistent with the single-morphogen model. Considering a “periodic eyespot”, which has repeats of a set of rings, damage-induced eyespots in mutants, and a scale-size distribution pattern in an eyespot, the induction model is the least incompatible with the actual eyespot diversity.

© 2011 Zoological Society of Japan
Joji M. Otaki "Color-Pattern Analysis of Eyespots in Butterfly Wings: A Critical Examination of Morphogen Gradient Models," Zoological Science 28(6), 403-413, (1 June 2011). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.28.403
Received: 29 September 2010; Accepted: 1 December 2010; Published: 1 June 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top