Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2019 Xenacoelomorph-Specific Hox Peptides: Insights into the Phylogeny of Acoels, Nemertodermatids, and Xenoturbellids
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Xenacoelomorpha has recently been proposed as an animal taxon that includes acoels, nemertodermatids, and xenoturbellids. Their flattened bodies are very simple and lack discrete organs. The Acoela and Nemertodermatida (which comprise Acoelomorpha) were traditionally regarded as early-diverged extant orders of the class Turbellaria of the phylum Platyhelminthes. Recent anatomical studies and molecular phylogenetic studies demonstrate that the two groups belong to the phylum Xenacoelomorpha together with Xenoturbellida. However, debate remains in regard to whether Xenacoelomorpha is monophyletic, and whether xenacoelomorphs are sisters to all other bilaterians or have close affinity to ambulacrarians. The present study addresses the first question by examining the presence or absence of diagnostic peptide sequences shared by the three taxa. Hox genes have been used to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of metazoans. It has been shown that lophotrochozoans, rotifers, and chaetognaths share diagnostic peptide sequences in the C-terminal region of the Lox5 (Hox5/6/7) homeodomain proteins, which supports the clustering of these taxa. Examination of the decoded genome of the acoel Praesagittifera naikaiensis and reported xenacoelomorph Hox genes revealed that acoels share a peptide NLK(S/T)MSQ(V/I)D, which starts immediately after the homeodomain sequence of the central Hox4/5/6. In addition, we found another diagnostic peptide, KEGKL, in the C-terminal region of the anterior Hox1, which is shared by all the three groups of xenacoelomorphs, but not other bilaterians. Furthermore, two acoels, Praesagittifera naikaiensis and Symsagittifera roscoffensis, share another peptide SG(A/P)PGM in the posterior Hox9/11/13. These results support the designation of the phylum Xenacoelomorpha, in which Acoela is a discrete group.

INTRODUCTION

Acoels and nemertodermatids are marine, soft-bodied, flattened acoelomates (Brusca et al., 2016) that have a unique epidermis with pulsatile activity. The mouth is located ventrally with an incomplete gut and no anus. These organisms lack discrete organs, such as a circulatory system and gonads. According to the traditional view prior to 2010, acoel flatworms and nemertodermatid flatworms (recently called acoelomorphs) were categorized as early-diverged extant orders of the class Turbellaria of the phylum Platyhelminthes, which included planarians, parasitic flukes, and tapeworms (Hyman, 1951; Brusca and Brusca, 2003). Planarians, parasitic flukes, and tapeworms are regarded as representatives of the phylum and are considered primitive bilaterians, but few studies have focused on acoels and nemertodermatids.

Xenoturbella bocki is found at depths of approximately 200 m in cold Baltic seawater and was first described only about 70 years ago (Westblad, 1949). Since then, several species of Xenoturbella have been recorded (Rouse et al., 2016; Nakano et al., 2017). Although morphological and anatomical similarities between Xenoturbella and acoelomorphs have been discussed, X. bocki has been considered an enigmatic animal, and its phylogenetic position has been obscure (Telford, 2008).

Molecular phylogeny is a powerful tool for inferring the phylogenetic relationships of metazoans that differ in morphology and embryology. Nucleotide substitutions in DNA likely occur neutrally, such that the substitution rate can be used to deduce the relationship without prejudicing the interpretation, which would be the case if it were based on specific morphological traits or embryological modes and features. X. bocki has been extensively used for molecular phylogenetic studies. A first round of molecular phylogenetic reports discusses the phylogenetic position of Xenoturbella (Norén et al., 1997; Bourlat et al., 2003; Bourlat et al., 2006) in relation to their enigmatic anatomy and life cycle (Lundin, 1998; Nakano et al., 2013; Perea-Atienza et al., 2015).

There has been considerable debate about the placement of Xenoturbella relative to acoel and nemertodermatid flatworms. Repeated analyses of molecular phylogeny have nearly reached a consensus that acoels, nemertodermatids, and xenoturbellids form a clade called Xenacoelomorpha (Phillipe et al., 2011). However, it remains a matter of debate whether Xenacoelomorpha is monophyletic or whether these organisms are sisters to all bilaterians or to ambulacrarians (echinoderms + hemichordates) (Ruiz-Trillo et al., 1999; Telford, 2008; Hejnol et al., 2009; Mwinyi et al., 2010; Ruiz-Trillo et al., 2014; Simakov et al., 2015; Cannon et al., 2016; Dittmann et al., 2018).

Most molecular phylogenetic studies are based on comparisons of quantitative molecular changes. Comparative studies of qualitative molecular traits may provide additional or more reliable support for those derived from quantitative analyses. An interesting example is encountered in a diagnostic peptide motif known as the “spiralian peptide” (Bayascas et al., 1998) or the “Lox5 peptide” (de Rosa et al., 1999). This motif is composed of KLTGP pentapeptides and is present immediately carboxyterminal to the homeodomains (the functionally important centers of these molecules) that are encoded by the central Hox genes. These genes include Lox5 and Hox6 in lophotrochozoans, but not in ecdysozoans or deuterostomes (see Fig. 2).

This motif is also shared by Lox5 in Dicyema japonicus (Kobayashi et al., 1999), which supports the inclusion of dicyemids in the lophotrochozoan group (Lu et al., 2017). Recently, Fröbius and Funch (2017) reported the presence of another peptide motif, KSLND, in Lox5 (Hox6/7) of rotifers (see Fig. 2). Because this motif is shared with chaetognaths, the authors suggested a close relationship between rotifers and chaetognaths, which are sometimes called Gnathifera. A recent molecular phylogenetic analysis of chaetognaths also supports this rotifer/chaetognath clustering (Marlétaz et al., 2019).

Brauchle et al. (2018) recently surveyed all 11 classes of homeobox-containing genes in xenacoelomorphs and showed the presence of anterior, central, and posterior Hox genes, which are each in the ATNP-type homeodomain family. However, no studies have examined the presence of diagnostic peptides in xenacoelomorphs thus far. Recently, we decoded the genome of the acoel, Praesagittifera naikaiensis (Arimoto et al., 2019), which is a marine acoel worm (Yamasu, 1982) that is easily found along the seashores of the Seto Inland Sea and may be widely used for studies of acoel biology (Hikosaka-Katayama and Hikosaka, 2015). In the present study, we examined the presence or absence of spiralian peptide-like sequences in the Hox genes of acoels, nemertodermatids, and xenoturbellids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genomic and transcriptomic sequence reads of the acoel, Praesagittifera naikaiensis, have been deposited in the sequence read archive of the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession No. PRJDB7329 (Arimoto et al., 2019). All data are also available from the GigaScience GigaDB repository ( http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100564) and at  http://marinegenomics.oist.jp/p_naikaiensis/viewer/info?project_id=71. Gene models have been annotated using BLAST searches (Camacho et al., 2009) against the NCBI RefSeq protein database release 88, and the results have been integrated into the database (Arimoto et al., 2019).

Table 1.

Homeobox genes in xenacoelomorphs.

img-z2-10_395.gif

Fig. 1.

Hox genes in acoels, a nemertodermatid, and Xenoturbella. (A) Alignments of amino acid sequences of the homeodomain encoded by anterior Hox1-related genes (top), central Hox4/5/6-related genes (upper middle), and posterior Hox9/11/13-related genes (lower middle). An alignment of the acoel Evx homeodomain is shown as a control (bottom). Sequence identity and similarity among homeodomains are indicated by * and:, respectively. Conserved amino acid residues are colored according to the properties of their side chains using the Clustal X color scheme ( http://www.jalview.org/help/html/colorSchemes/clustal.html ). Abbreviations of species names: (acoels) Pn, Praesagittifera naikaiensis; Sr, Symsagittifera roscoffensis; Hm, Hofstenia miamia; Is, Isodiametra pulchra; (a nemertodermatid) Nw, Nemertoderma westbladi; and (a xenoturbellid) Xb, Xenoturbella bocki. (B) Molecular phylogeny showing relationships among homeobox genes in xenacoelomorphs. A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using the sequences of residues 1–60. Acoel Evx was used as an outgroup. Numbers at nodes show bootstrap support (1000 iterations) for the clustering. Clustering of anterior Hox-1-related, central Hox4/5/6-related, and posterior Hox9/11/13-related genes is evident.

img-z3-4_395.jpg

Among the 53 predicted homeobox genes in the database, three genes were identified as ANTP-type homeodomain proteins and used in this study (Table 1). Homeodomain amino-acid sequences of xenacoelomorphs were retrieved from the NCBI data bank (Table 1). Data sources for other metazoans are shown in  Supplementary Table 1 (10.2108.zsj.36.395.s1.pdf). Amino-acid alignments were generated using MAFFT version 7.305 (Katoh et al., 2002), and a molecular phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method and IQ-TREE version 1.6.10 (Nguyen et al., 2015). All homeodomain sequences were compared, and the LG+G4 substitution model was selected as the optimal one for inferring a phylogenetic tree. The nodes of the tree were evaluated using 1000 bootstrap replications. Spiralian-peptide-like sequences were identified by manually aligning amino-acid sequences at positions 50–60 of the homeodomain and its carboxyl-terminal flanking region. The identities and similarities of amino-acid sequences were checked by visual inspection.

RESULTS

Praesagittifera naikaiensis contains three Hox genes

Among the 53 predicted homeobox genes in the P. naikaiensis genome database, three genes were identified as ANTP-type homeodomain proteins (Table 1; Fig. 1A). The three genes correspond to an anterior Hox1-like gene (tentatively called PnHox1), a central Hox4/5/6-like gene (PnHox4/5/6), and a posterior Hox9/11/13-like gene (PnHox9/11/13) (Table 1; Fig. 1A). The presence of one representative for the anterior Hox-cluster gene (tentatively called Hox1), the central one (tentatively called Hox4/5/6), and the posterior one (tentatively called Hox9/11/13) has been reported in the acoels Symsagittifera roscoffensis (Moreno et al., 2009), Hofstenia miamia, and Isodiametra pulchra (Cook et al., 2004) (Table 1).

A nemertodermatid, Nemertoderma westbladi, contains one anterior, one central, and two posterior Hox genes (Jimenez-Guri et al., 2006; Brauchle et al., 2018) (Table 1). Since the reported nemertodermatid central Hox4/5/6 ortholog was partial (Jimenez-Guri et al., 2006), we could not include it in further analyses. In addition, NwHox9/11/13-2 was only used in this analysis because NwHox9/11/13-2 shows more similarity to others than NwHox9/11/13-1. On the other hand, X. bocki contains five copies, one anterior, three central (XbHox4/5/6-1, -2, and -3), and one posterior gene (Brauchle et al., 2018) (Table 1).

Molecular phylogeny was carried out for xenacoelomorph Hox genes using 60 amino-acid residues of the homeodomain. Tree topologies with high bootstrap support were not obtained in the first several trials using a dataset that included all three XbHox4/5/6s of X. bocki due to a long-branch attraction, which was mainly caused by XbHox4/5/6-1. We selected XbHox4/5/6-3 since this homeodomain sequence exhibited greater similarity to those of other acoelomorphs (Fig. 1A). In addition, we found that using Evx (another member of the ANTP family) as an outgroup resulted in the most reliable tree topology (Fig. 1B). The tree demonstrated clustering of xenacoelomorph members Hox1, Hox4/5/6 and Hox9/11/13, which had 77, 69, and 90% bootstrap support, respectively.

The tree topology differed among the three Hox genes but generally displayed grouping of acoel homeodomains, especially as seen in Hox4/5/6, as well as a close relationship between P. naikaiensis and S. roscoffensis in all three clusters. The topology also indicates that Xenoturbella homeodomains diverged first in the Hox1 and Hox4/5/6 clusters (Fig. 1B). These results paved the way for the subsequent examination of the presence of spiralian Hox-peptide-like sequences in xenacoelomorph Hox genes.

Fig. 2.

Alignments of amino acid sequences at positions 50–60 of the homeodomain and the adjacent carboxyl flanking region of central Hox4/5/6 genes. Shared peptide sequences are boxed by magenta in acoels, blue in lophotrochozoans, and green in gnathiferans. No comparable sequence of nemertodermatids has been reported yet. Ac, acoels; Xe, Xenoturbella bocki. For abbreviations of metazoan species,  see Supplementary Table 1 (10.2108.zsj.36.395.s1.pdf). A broad relationship of bilaterians is drawn based on Simakov et al. (2015) and Giribet (2016).

img-z4-58_395.jpg

Fig. 3.

Alignments of amino acid sequences at positions 50–60 of the homeodomain and following the carboxyl-flanking region of anterior Hox1 genes. Peptide sequences shared by all three clades of Xenacoelomorph are boxed in magenta. Ac, acoel; Ne, nemertodermatid; Xe, Xenoturbella bocki. For abbreviations of metazoan species,  see Supplementary Table S1 (10.2108.zsj.36.395.s1.pdf).

img-z5-1_395.jpg

The Hox4/5/6-specific peptide is shared by acoels, but not xenoturbellids

Figure 2 shows the alignment of the deduced amino-acid sequences at residues 50–60 of the homeodomain and the carboxyl terminal-flanking region of Hox4/5/6-related proteins. As reported previously, lophotrochozoans shared the peptide KLTG(P/S) (Bayascas et al., 1998; De Rosa et al., 1999; Kobayashi et al., 1999), while gnathiferans (rotifers and chaetognaths) have KSIND (Fröbius and Funch, 2017). We found that the three acoels, S. roscoffensis, H. miamia, and P. naikaiensis, all contained the nonapeptide NLK(S/T) MSQ(V/I)D starting immediately after position 60 of the homeodomain sequence for asparagine. Seven amino acids were identical, and two were similar.

Although there were no available data from the acoel I. pulchra, it is highly likely that acoels share a Hox4/5/6-specific peptide, which provides support for a single, discrete acoel taxon. On the other hand, we failed to find this peptide in X. bocki, and no data are available for nemertodermatids (Fig. 2). Furthermore, this diagnostic peptide was not found in ecdysozoans, spiralians, lophotrochozoans, or deuterostomes (Fig. 2).

A Hox1-specific peptide shared by xenacoelomorphs

Because xenacoelomorphs contain three Hox-cluster genes, we also compared the deduced amino acid sequences of the carboxyl terminal-flanking region for Hox1-related and Hox9/11/13-related proteins. As a result, we found the peptide KEGKL in Hox1 starting immediately after the 60th homeodomain residue (L/V, Fig. 3). This peptide was shared by acoels, a nemertodermatid, and a xenoturbellid. None of the other examined metazoans shared this motif (Fig. 3), although the first two amino acids (KE) are commonly seen in other metazoans (Fig. 3). This may indicate that the pentapeptide is specific to xenacoelomorphs, which supports the monophyly of the phylum Xenacoelomorpha.

A Hox9/11/13-specific peptide shared by two acoels

We also found that the two acoels S. roscoffensis and P. naikaiensis conserved an SG(A/G)PGM motif from the carboxyterminal flanking region for Hox9/11/13-related proteins (Fig. 4). This motif was not shared by any other acoels, a nemertodermatid, a xenoturbellid, or other bilaterians, which suggests a close relationship between the two acoels.

DISCUSSION

We have reported on the presence of specific Hox-peptide sequences in xenacoelomorphs: (a) a Hox4/5/6-specific peptide sequence shared by acoels but not by Xenoturbella, although the status of nemertodermatids remains unclear; (b) a peptide sequence in Hox1 shared by all three xenacoelomorph members; and (c) a peptide sequence in Hox9/11/13 shared by the two acoels, S. roscoffensis and P. naikaiensis. Together with previous reports on clustering of the three xenacoelomorphs, the present results suggest that (1) Xenacoelomorpha is a discrete taxon or phylum that unites acoels, nemertodermatids, and xenoturbellids; (2) Acoela is a discrete clade in that phylum; and (3) the acoels S. roscoffensis and P. naikaiensis are closely related in comparison with other acoel species. The third notion is also supported by molecular phylogeny results based on a comparison of the whole mitochondrial genome sequences (Arimoto et al., 2019).

One possible argument against the present analysis is whether so few amino acids genuinely constitute a diagnostic peptide motif. Nevertheless, we identified this motif as constituting at least five consecutive identical amino acids that correspond to those in lophotrochozoan-specific Lox5 peptide (De Rosa et al., 1999) and rotifer/chaetognath Hox6 peptide (Fröbius and Funch, 2017). In particular, the acoel-specific Hox4/5/6 peptide consists of seven identical amino acids (Fig. 2), while the xenacoelomorph-specific Hox1 peptide consists of five (Fig. 3), as does the Hox9/11/13 peptide shared by P. naikaiensis and S. roscoffensis (Fig. 4). The homeodomain is the functionally important center of these proteins, so it is expected for the amino acids adjoining both the N- and C-terminal regions to manifest sequence similarity among phylogenetically closely related species. For example, lophotrochozoans share an -RAK- sequence at the C-terminus of Post2 (Fig. 4). The presence of such peptides also supports the clustering of lophotrochozoan members (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Alignments of amino acid sequences at positions 50–60 of the homeodomain and adjacent carboxyl-flanking region of posterior Hox9/11/13 genes. A shared peptide sequence was found in both the acoels Praesagittifera naikaiensis and S. roscoffensis. Three peptides shared by lophotrochozoans are boxed. Ac, acoels; Ne, nemertodermatid; Xe, X. bocki. For abbreviations of metazoan species,  see Supplementary Table S1 (10.2108.zsj.36.395.s1.pdf).

img-z6-1_395.jpg

The present results provide further qualitative support of the clustering of Acoela, Nemertodermatida, and Xenoturbellida into the phylum Xenacoelomorpha. Molecular phylogenetic studies (e.g., Phillipe et al., 2011; Simakov et al., 2015) indicate that Acoela and Nemertodermatida comprise a discrete sister clade to Xenoturbellida. However, due to a lack of nemertodermatid Hox4/5/6-peptide data, the present study could not provide a support for the sister relationship between Acoela and Nemertodermatida.

On the other hand, the present results shed little light on the question of whether Xenacoelomorpha is a sister to all bilaterians or to deuterostomes. We carefully compared amino acid sequences of the C-terminal of the homeodomains and the adjacent carboxyl-flanking region between xenacoelomorphs and ambulacrarians (deuterostomes) or protostomes, but we did not find any clues about their relationship. In other words, specific Hox peptides are likely conserved among some clades of metazoans like xenacoelomorphs, lophotrochozoans, or rotifers/chaetognaths. Because Hox peptides of xenacoelomorphs were not shared with deuterostomes (Figs. 24), it is impossible to deduce whether there is a close relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria. This interesting issue should be investigated in future studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Kanako Hisata for preparation of the figures. Dr. Steven Aird is acknowledged for his help in editing the manuscript. This research was supported by the OIST Internal Funds to the Marine Genomics Unit (NS).

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors have no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUSIONS

UT and NS designed the experiments. UT, AA, and KT conducted the analyses. UT, AA, KT, and NS wrote the manuscript.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary material for this article is available online (URL:  https://bioone.org/journals/supplementalcontent/10.2108/zs190058/10.2108.zsj.36.395.s1.pdf)

 Supplementary Table S1 (10.2108.zsj.36.395.s1.pdf). Homeobox genes in bilaterians.

REFERENCES

1.

Arimoto A, Hikosaka-Katayama T, Hikosaka A, Tagawa K, Inoue T, Ueki T, et al. (2019) A draft nuclear-genome assembly of the acoel flatworm Praesagittifera naikaiensis. GigaScience 8: 1–8 Google Scholar

2.

Bayascas JR, Castillo E, Saló E (1998) Platyhelminthes have a Hox code differentially activated during regeneration, with genes closely related to those of spiralian protostomes. Dev Genes Evol 208: 467–473 Google Scholar

3.

Bourlat SJ, Nielsen C, Lockyer AE, Littlewood D, Timothy J, Telford MJ (2003) Xenoturbella is a deuterostome that eats molluscs. Nature 424: 925–928 Google Scholar

4.

Bourlat SJ, Juliusdottir T, Lowe C, Freeman R, Aronowicz J, Kirschner M, et al. (2006) Deuterostome phylogeny reveals monophyletic chordates and the new phylum Xenoturbellida. Nature 444: 85–88 Google Scholar

5.

Brauchle M, Bilican A, Eyer C, Bailly X, Martínez P, Ladurner P, et al. (2018) Xenacoelomorpha survey reveals that all 11 animal Homeobox gene classes were present in the first Bilaterians. Genome Biol Evol 10: 2205–2217 Google Scholar

6.

Brusca RC, Brusca GJ (2003) Invertebrates. 2nd ed. Sinauer, MA, USA Google Scholar

7.

Brusca RC, Moor W, Shuster SM (2016) Invertebrates. 3rd ed. Sinauer, MA, USA Google Scholar

8.

Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. (2009) BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421 Google Scholar

9.

Cannon JT, Vellutini BC, Smith J 3rd , Ronquist F, Jondelius U, Hejnol A (2016) Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa. Nature 530: 89–93 Google Scholar

10.

Cook CE, Jiménez E, Akam M, Saló E (2004) The Hox gene complement of acoel flatworms, a basal bilaterian clade. Evol Dev 6: 154–163 Google Scholar

11.

De Rosa R, Grenier JK, Andreeva T, Cook CE, Adoutte A, Akam M, et al. (1999) Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature 399: 772–776 Google Scholar

12.

Dittmann IL, Zauchner T, Nevard LM, Telford MJ, Egger B (2018) SALMFamide2 and serotonin immunoreactivity in the nervous system of some acoels (Xenacoelomorpha). J Morphol 279: 589–597 Google Scholar

13.

Fröbius AC, Funch P (2017) Rotiferan Hox genes give new insights into the evolution of metazoan bodyplans. Nat Commun 8: 9 Google Scholar

14.

Giribet G (2016) New animal phylogeny: future challenges for animal phylogeny in the age of phylogenomics. Organisms Diver Evol 16: 419–426 Google Scholar

15.

Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, et al. (2009) Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc Royal Soc B 276: 4261–4270 Google Scholar

16.

Hikosaka-Katayama T, Hikosaka A (2015) Artificial rearing system for Praesagittifera naikaiensis (Acoela, Acoelomorpha). Studies in Human Science 10: 17–23 Google Scholar

17.

Hyman LH (1951) The Invertebrates: Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela; the Acoelomate Bilateria. McGraw-Hill, NY, USA Google Scholar

18.

Jimenez-Guri E, Paps J, Garcia-Fernandez J, Salo E (2006) Hox and ParaHox genes in Nemertodermatida, a basal bilaterian clade. Int J Dev Biol 50: 675–679 Google Scholar

19.

Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3059–3066 Google Scholar

20.

Kobayashi M, Furuya H, Holland PWH (1999) Dicyemids are higher animals. Nature 401: 762 Google Scholar

21.

Lu TM, Kanda M, Satoh N, Furuya H (2017) The phylogenetic postion of dicyemid mesozoans offer insights into spiralian evolution. Zool Lett 3: 6 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-017-0068-5 Google Scholar

22.

Lundin K (1998) The epidermal ciliary rootlets of Xenoturbella bocki (Xenoturbellida) revisited: new support for a possible kinship with the Acoelomorpha (Platyhelminthes) Zoologica Scripta 27: 263–270 Google Scholar

23.

Marlétaz F, Peijnenburg KTCA, Goto T, Satoh N, Rokhsar DS (2019) A new spiralian phylogeny places the enigmatic arrow worms among gnathiferans. Curr Biol 29: 1–7 Google Scholar

24.

Moreno E, Nadal M, Baguñà J, Martínez P (2009) Tracking the origins of the bilaterian Hox patterning system: insights from the acoel flatworm Symsagittifera roscoffensis. Evol Dev 11: 574–581 Google Scholar

25.

Mwinyi A, Bailly X, Boulat SJ, Jondelius U, Littlewood DTJ, Podsiadlowski L (2010) The phylogenetic position of Acoela as revealed by the complete mitochondrial genome of Symsagittifera roscoffensis. BMC Biol 10: 309 Google Scholar

26.

Nakano H, Lundin K, Bourlat SJ, Telford MJ, Funch P, Nyengaard JR, et al. (2013) Xenoturbella bocki exhibits direct development with similarities to Acoelomorpha. Nat Commun 4: 153 Google Scholar

27.

Nakano H, Miyazawa H, Maeno A, Shiroishi T, Kakui K, Koyanagi R, et al. (2017) A new species of Xenoturbella from the western Pacific Ocean and the evolution of Xenoturbella. BMC Evol Biol 17: 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1080-2 Google Scholar

28.

Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32: 268–274 Google Scholar

29.

Norén M, Jondelius U (1997) Xenoturbella's molluscan relatives. Nature 390: 31–32 Google Scholar

30.

Perea-Atienza E, Gavilan B, Chiodin M, Abril JF, Hoff KJ, Poustka AJ, et al. (2015) The nervous system of Xenacoelomorpha: a genomic perspective. J Exp Biol 218: 618–628 Google Scholar

31.

Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Copley RR, Moroz LL, Nakano H, Poustka AJ, et al. (2011) Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature 470: 255–258 Google Scholar

32.

Robertson HE, Lapraz F, Egger B, Telford MJ, Schiffer PH (2017) The mitochondrial genomes of the acoelomorph worms Paratomella rubra, Isodiametra pulchra and Archaphanostoma ylvae. Sci Rep 12: 1847 Google Scholar

33.

Rouse GW, Wilson N, Carvajal J, Vrijenhoek R (2016) New deep-sea species of Xenoturbella and the position of Xenacoelomorpha. Nature 530: 94–97 Google Scholar

34.

Ruiz-Trillo I, Riutort M, Littlewood DTJ, Hejnol EA, Baguñà J (1999) Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. Science 283: 1919–1923 Google Scholar

35.

Ruiz-Trillo I, Riutort M, Fourcade HM, Baguñà J, Boore JL (2014) Mitochondrial genome data support the basal position of Acoelomorpha and the polyphyly of the Platyhelminthes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33: 321–332 Google Scholar

36.

Simakov O, Kawashima T, Maretaze F, Jenkins J, et al. (2015) Hemichordate genomes and deuterostome origin. Nature 527: 459–463 Google Scholar

37.

Telford MJ (2008) Xenoturbellida: the fourth deuterostome phylum and the diet of worms. Genesis 46: 580–586 Google Scholar

38.

Westblad E (1949) Xenoturbella bocki n. g., n. sp., a peculiar, primitive Turbellarian type. Arkiv för Zoologi 1: 3–29 Google Scholar

39.

Yamasu T (1982) Five new species of acoel flatworms from Japan. Garaxia 1: 29–43 Google Scholar
© 2019 Zoological Society of Japan
Tatsuya Ueki, Asuka Arimoto, Kuni Tagawa, and Noriyuki Satoh "Xenacoelomorph-Specific Hox Peptides: Insights into the Phylogeny of Acoels, Nemertodermatids, and Xenoturbellids," Zoological Science 36(5), 395-401, (1 October 2019). https://doi.org/10.2108/zs190045
Received: 4 April 2019; Accepted: 10 May 2019; Published: 1 October 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top