Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
24 November 2020 The Compound Eye Possesses a Self-Sustaining Circadian Oscillator in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus
Chikako Ohguro, Yoshiyuki Moriyama, Kenji Tomioka
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Many insects show daily and circadian changes in morphology and physiology in their compound eye. In this study, we investigated whether the compound eye had an intrinsic circadian rhythm in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. We found that clock genes period (per), timeless (tim), cryptochrome 2 (cry2), and cycle (cyc) were rhythmically expressed in the compound eye under 12-h light/12-h dark cycles (LD 12:12) and constant darkness (DD) at a constant temperature. After the optic nerves were severed (ONX), a weak but significant rhythmic expression persisted for per and tim under LD 12:12, while under DD, tim and cyc showed rhythmic expression. We also found that more than half of the ONX compound eyes exhibited weak but significant circadian electroretinographic rhythms. These results clearly demonstrate that the cricket compound eye possesses an intrinsic circadian oscillator which can drive the circadian light sensitivity rhythm in the eye, and that the circadian clock in the optic lobe exerts its influence on the oscillator in the eye.

INTRODUCTION

Circadian rhythms are roughly 24-hr rhythms that play roles in various physiological and behavioral functions of insects, including antennal olfaction (Krishnan et al., 2008; Saifullah and Page, 2009), sensitivity in the visual system, cuticular deposition (Ito et al., 2008; Weber, 1995), adult eclosion (Ito and Tomioka, 2016), and locomotion (Page, 1982; Tomioka and Chiba, 1984). These rhythms are controlled by circadian clocks located in the central clock tissue and/or peripheral tissues (Tomioka and Matsumoto, 2010, 2019; Tomioka et al., 2012). In the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, the central circadian clock is localized in the lamina-medulla complex of the optic lobe (Tomioka and Chiba, 1992).

The oscillatory mechanism of circadian clocks has been studied in some insects, including the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and G. bimaculatus (Tomioka and Matsumoto, 2015, 2019). At the molecular level, this clock is characterized by the cyclic expression of the clock genes per and tim (Tataroglu and Emery, 2015; Tomioka and Matsumoto, 2019). Their expression is thought to be transcriptionally regulated by the transcription factors CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC). CLK and CYC form a heterodimer and bind to the E-box in the promoter region of per and tim to activate their transcription. The mRNAs are translated to PER and TIM proteins in the cytoplasm, and these proteins form a PER/TIM heterodimer, enter the nucleus, and suppress their own genes' transcription through the inactivation of CLK/CYC. In many insects, including G. bimaculatus, cyc is rhythmically expressed (Uryu et al., 2013; Tomioka and Matsumoto, 2019), while in D. melanogaster, not cyc but Clk is rhythmically expressed (Glossop et al., 1999). In addition to these, cry2 and cry1 are also involved in the clock mechanism of G. bimaculatus, forming an oscillatory loop separate from the per/tim loop (Tokuoka et al., 2017). Unlike their roles in crickets, cry1 plays an essential role in photic entrainment in D. melanogaster and the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (Stanewsky et al., 1998; Zhu et al., 2008), while cry2 is an important component in the core oscillatory loop acting with per in the honey bee, Apis mellifera, and in D. plexippus (Rubin et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2008; Lugena et al., 2019).

In insects, rhythmic expression of clock genes has been reported in various tissues (Plautz et al., 1997; Giebultowicz, 2000; Uryu and Tomioka, 2010). Among them, the compound eyes are the most profoundly studied. They show daily and circadian changes in their sensitivity to light (Koehler and Fleissner, 1978; Fleissner, 1982). Morphological and physiological changes probably cause this rhythm. For example, in many arthropods, the size of the rhabdom, a photoreceptive structure composed of the microvilli of photoreceptor cells, increases during night and the pigment granules in retinular cells migrate to increase light-capturing efficiency (Arikawa et al., 1988; Meyer-Rochow, 1999). It is also known that in D. melanogaster, the compound eye possesses an autonomous circadian clock in which clock genes are cyclically expressed (Cheng and Hardin, 1998; Damulewicz et al., 2015). However, in other insects, whether the compound eye possesses its own oscillator has not been examined, and more importantly, how the rhythm in the compound eye is regulated by the central clock remains largely unknown.

In this study, we examined whether the compound eye harbored a circadian oscillator and how the central clock exerted its influence on the circadian rhythm of the compound eye in the cricket G. bimaculatus. The compound eye of this cricket shows circadian changes in light sensitivity as measured by electroretinogram (ERG) (Tomioka and Chiba, 1982; Tomioka, 1985). With quantitative RT-PCR, we showed that the clock genes were rhythmically expressed in the compound eye under LD 12:12 and DD, and that the rhythm persisted, at least in some of the clock genes, albeit with a reduced amplitude even after the optic nerves were severed. We also demonstrated that more than half of the compound eyes of which the optic nerves were severed (ONX) maintained circadian ERG rhythms. These results suggest that the compound eye of the cricket contains a circadian oscillator, which is also governed by the central clock in the optic lobe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

All experiments were performed with 7-10-day-old adult male crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, which were taken from our laboratory colony. They were kept under controlled conditions of 12-h light and 12-h darkness (LD12:12, light: 0600-1800, Japan Standard Time) and at a constant temperature of 25°C ± 1.0°C.

Surgical manipulation

To sever the optic nerves, the dorsal side of the cuticle around the compound eye was cut with a razor knife and the compound eye was lifted with tweezers to expose the optic nerves. The nerves were severed with a pair of micro-scissors, the compound eye was placed in its original position, and the wound was sealed with hemolymph clotting. However, in some cases, especially for ERG recordings, the wound was sealed with a small amount of beeswax-colophony mixture. The dissection was performed between zeitgeber time (ZT; ZT 0 and ZT 12 correspond to lights-on and lights-off, respectively) 3 and 5 under CO2 anesthesia using a dissecting microscope.

Measurement of RNA levels

Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) was used for the measurement of mRNA levels of clock genes Gryllus bimaculatus period (Gb'per, GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ Accession No. BAG48878), timeless (Gb'tim, BAJ16356), cryptochrome 2 (Gb'cry2, LC202053), cycle (Gb'cyc, AB762416), and Clock (Gb'Clk, AB738083). Five untreated and five ONX compound eyes were collected for each condition, i.e., LD 12:12 and DD, and at each sampling time, i.e., ZT or circadian time (CT; CT 0 and CT 12 correspond to subjective light-on and subjective light-off, respectively) 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 22. A total of 60 crickets were used. The optic nerves of the crickets were unilaterally cut between ZT 3–4, and the ONX and untreated compound eyes were collected separately. Under LD 12:12, the sampling was started at ZT 6 on the day of operation. For sampling under DD, the crickets were transferred to DD at ZT 12, and the sampling was performed under dim red light, starting at CT 6.

Total RNA was extracted and purified from a single compound eye of adult male crickets using the TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, AC, USA). Contaminating genomic DNA was removed by treating the total RNA with DNase I (Invitrogen). Approximately 450 ng of total RNA of each sample was reverse transcribed with random hexamers using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan). qPCR was performed using a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and a KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit (NIPPON Genetics, Tokyo, Japan), including SYBR Green, with gene-specific primers (Table 1). The qPCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 20 s and then 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 s, and 60°C for 30 s with 0.4 µM concentration of each primer. The results were analyzed using the software associated with the instrument. The values were normalized with the values of Gb'rpl18a, a housekeeping gene. During these treatments, some of the samples were lost, and values obtained from 2–5 samples were pooled to calculate the mean ± SEM.

Table 1.

PCR primers used for quantitative RT-PCR.

t_zs200118_001.gif

Fig. 1.

In situ hybridization of Gb'per (red) and Gb'cry2 (blue) in the compound eye at ZT 18 in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. (B) shows magnification of the area indicated by a square in (A). Some of the Gb'per and Gb'cry2 signals are indicated by red and blue arrows, respectively. Retinal cells co-express Gb'per and Gb'cry2 and their signals are mostly located in and around the nucleus. (C) shows the negative control stained without probes. (D) illustrates the anatomical structure of the compound eye and a part of the optic lobe, including lamina and medulla, locus of the central circadian clock. CE, compound eye; Co, cornea; La, lamina; Me, medulla; ON, optic nerves; OS, optic stalk. For further explanation, see the text. Scale bars: 100 µm in (A, C), 50 µm in (B).

fi_zs200118_001.jpg

In situ hybridization

In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed according to the method described by Kutaragi et al. (2018) using 3 adult male crickets collected at ZT 18, at which the mRNA levels of the clock genes Gb'per and Gb'cry2 were expected to be at or near peak levels (Moriyama et al., 2008; Tokuoka et al., 2017). Briefly, the collected cricket heads were fixed with 4% PFA solution for 24 h at 4°C, dehydrated by a series of butyl alcohol and ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. Tissues were sectioned at 6 µm thickness and mounted on slides. ISH was performed using ViewRNA ISH Tissue Assay (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), following the manufacturer's instructions. To unmask the RNA targets, tissue sections were deparaffinized and incubated in pre-treatment buffer at 90–95°C for 10 min and digested with protease (Affymetrix, QVT1102) (1:100 dilution) at 40°C for 10 min, followed by fixation with 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for 5 min. The unmasked tissue sections were subsequently hybridized with the ViewRNA probe set (1:50 dilution) for 2 h at 40°C, followed by a series of post-hybridization washes. The ViewRNA probes used for detecting Gb'per and Gb'cry2 were designed and synthesized by Affymetrix, covering the 1027–2016 and 1548–2669 base regions, respectively. A non-probe sample was utilized as a negative control. Signal amplification was achieved via a series of sequential hybridizations and washes according to the manufacturer's instructions. Signals for Gb'per and Gb'cry2 were detected with Fast Red and Fast Blue substrate, respectively. Slides were post-fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, mounted with Dako Ultramount mounting medium (Dako, Carpinteria, CA), observed, and photographed using light microscopy (BZ-X700, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan).

Fig. 2.

Daily expression profiles of clock genes, Gb'per, Gb'tim, Gb'cry2, Gb'cyc, and Gb'Clk, in the compound eye of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus under light-dark cycles. Blue, intact eyes; red, eyes with severed optic nerves (ONX). Error bars indicate SEM. Black and white bars above the panels indicate light (white) and dark (black) conditions. Different lower-case letters indicate that the values were significantly different from each other (Tukey-test, P < 0.05). Asterisks indicate that the values were significantly different from those of intact controls (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, t-test). For further explanation, see the text.

fi_zs200118_002.jpg

Recording of ERG

For recording ERG, a compound electrical response generated by various retinal cells in response to a light stimulus, crickets, whose legs were amputated, were fixed to a supporting rod, and enamel-insulated Ag wire electrodes (ϕ 200 µm) were chronically implanted into the immediate vicinity of the receptor layer of their compound eyes. The apparatus was arranged so that the ERGs elicited by a 400 ms flash of green light (λ = 525 nm) at intervals of 1 h were recorded automatically. The flash was given by a green light emitting diode (LK-5PG, LED & Application Technologies, China) driven by an electronic stimulator (SEN-3301, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo), and the stimulus intensities were 3.35 µW/cm2, which were below saturation for the ERG. Electrical signals were amplified by a biophysical amplifier (MEG-2100, Nihon Kohden), and monitored with an oscilloscope (2211, Tektronix, Tokyo). The signals were collected and analyzed on an IBM computer using data acquisition hardware (CED1401, Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd., Cambridge, UK) and software (Spike II, Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd.). Amplitudes of the on-component of ERGs were measured. The ERG recording was started around ZT 5–6 and the light was turned off at ZT 12 to record the ERG under DD. The recording was continued for at least 48 h and up to 120 h.

Statistical analysis

To detect daily or circadian fluctuations of mRNA levels, the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc Tukey's test was used to compare values at different time points within an identically treated group of crickets. Since ANOVA detects significant variation between time points irrespective of rhythmicity, the CircWave (ver. 1.4) program (available at  https://www.euclock.org/results/item/circ-wave.html), which uses the F-test for significance, was used to confirm significant daily or circadian rhythmicity. Rhythmicity was considered to exist when both ANOVA and CircWave detected significant fluctuations. When the daily fluctuation was detected either by ANOVA or by CircWave, it was judged to be pseudo-rhythmic. For comparison between intact and optic nerve severed compound eyes, the t-test was used.

To detect rhythmicity in the ERG recordings, we removed a long-term trend estimated by linear regression and the resultant time series were analyzed with the CircWave to detect any significant circadian rhythmicity.

For all statistical tests, the significance level was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Clock gene expression in the compound eye

To examine whether the clock genes were expressed in the compound eye, we performed an in situ hybridization (ISH) of Gb'per and Gb'cry2 with the adult compound eyes sampled in the middle of the night (ZT 18). As shown in Fig. 1, the expression of both Gb'per and Gb'cry2 was detected and the transcripts were most abundant in and around the nucleus. These results showed that Gb'per was more abundantly expressed than Gb'cry2.

Daily expression profiles of clock genes under LD 12:12 and DD

We examined the daily expression patterns of the clock genes Gb'per, Gb'tim, Gb'cry2, Gb'Clk, and Gb'cyc under LD 12:12. Except for Gb'Clk, they all showed clear daily expression rhythms (Fig. 2). Gb'per, Gb'tim, and Gb'cry2 all had a trough during the day and a peak during the night, although the peak occurred slightly earlier for Gb'tim. Gb'cyc showed a peak during mid-day to late-day, while Gb'Clk showed a peudo-rhythmic pattern with a significant rhythm detected only by CircWave (Table 2). The expression level of Gb'per at ZT 18 was approximately 6-fold higher than that of Gb'cry2, being consistent with the above-mentioned ISH results.

Under DD, similar rhythmic profiles were observed in Gb'per, Gb'tim, Gb'cry2, and Gb'cyc, while Gb'Clk showed no significant rhythms (Fig. 3, Table 2). These expression profiles are similar to those found in the clock tissue, i.e., optic lobes (Moriyama et al., 2008, 2012; Danbara et al., 2010; Uryu et al., 2013).

Effects of optic nerve severance on the expression of the clock genes

To examine whether the rhythmic expression of the clock genes was intrinsic in the compound eye, we measured the mRNA expression profiles in the compound eyes which were isolated from the optic lobe by cutting the optic nerves. Under LD 12:12, for all the clock genes measured except Gb'cry2, mRNA levels were significantly reduced, below the lowest level in the intact control at most time points (Fig. 2). For Gb'cry2, the mRNA levels stayed at almost constant levels, intermediate between trough and peak, in the control. Only Gb'per and Gb'tim maintained rhythmic expressions, with a peak during the night, like in intact controls. However, the other three genes, Gb'cry2, Gb'Clk, and Gb'cyc were arrhythmically expressed.

Under DD, expression levels of the clock genes in the ONX compound eyes were similar to those found under LD 12:12 (Fig. 3). Gb'cry2 mRNAs showed an intermediate level between trough and peak of the intact control eyes like in LD 12:12, while other clock genes showed significantly reduced mRNA levels, below the trough level of the control eyes. While Gb'per and Gb'cry2 lost their rhythmic expression, Gb'tim and Gb'cyc showed a weak but statistically significant rhythm with a peak at the middle of the subjective night and at late subjective day, respectively (Fig. 3, Table 2).

Table 2.

Results of statistical analyses of daily clock gene expression in the compound eyes of Gryllus bimaculatus with intact or severed optic nerves (ONX) under 12-h light/12-h dark cycle (LD 12:12) or constant darkness (DD). R: rhythmic, PR: pseudo-rhythmic, ND: no significant rhythm was detected.

t_zs200118_002.gif

Fig. 3.

Circadian expression profiles of clock genes, Gb'per, Gb'tim, Gb'cry2, Gb'cyc, and Gb'Clk, in the compound eye of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus under constant darkness. Blue, intact eyes; red, eyes with severed optic nerves (ONX). Error bars indicate SEM. Gray and black bars above the panels indicate subjective day and night, respectively. Different lower-case letters indicate that the values were significantly different from each other (Tukey's test, P < 0.05). Asterisks indicate that the values were significantly different from those in the intact controls (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, t-test). For further explanation see the text.

fi_zs200118_003.jpg

Circadian ERG rhythms

The finding of weak but significant clock gene expression rhythms in the compound eyes neurally isolated from the optic lobe prompted us to examine whether ERG rhythms persisted after the optic nerves were severed. In G. bimaculatus, we have previously shown that the compound eye shows a clear circadian rhythm in amplitudes of ERG (Tomioka and Chiba, 1982; Tomioka, 1985).

We examined ERG rhythms in eight intact compound eyes subjected to DD for at least 48 h and up to 120 h. All of the eyes showed a significant circadian rhythm, with a peak during the subjective night (Fig. 4A). When the optic nerves were severed in 15 compound eyes, six lost the rhythm (exemplified in Fig. 4B) and the remaining nine showed a weak but significant rhythmicity with a peak during the subjective night, as examplified in Fig. 4C. With an additional seven crickets, we examined whether the severed optic nerves were regenerated 5 days post operation and found that there was no apparent indication of regeneration during this short period, as reported for the locust central nervous system (Boulton, 1969). Although we performed no sham operation experiment for the ONX, the weakening of ERG rhythms should be attributable to the ONX because when the optic tract was severed with a similar surgical manipulation, the operated eyes showed normal ERG rhythms (Tomioka and Chiba, 1982).

DISCUSSION

Insect compound eyes have been reported to show rhythmic changes in their morphology and physiology. In the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, the compound eye shows clear circadian changes in its sensitivity, as evidenced by the amplitude of the ERG (Tomioka and Chiba, 1982; Tomioka, 1985), and by morphological changes such as rhabdom size (Sakura et al., 2003). The present study clearly demonstrated that the clock genes were rhythmically expressed in the compound eye under LD 12:12 and DD (Figs. 2 and 3), and that their expression patterns were quite similar to those observed in the optic lobe, the cricket's clock tissue (Danbara et al., 2010; Moriyama et al., 2008, 2012; Uryu et al., 2013). Our findings are consistent with those in other insects in that clock genes are rhythmically expressed in the compound eye (Siwicki et al., 1988; Sauman and Reppert, 1996; Damulewicz et al., 2015). This fact suggests that the morphological and physiological rhythms in the compound eye are most likely based on the circadian molecular oscillation, like the behavioral rhythms of D. melanogaster caused by circadian molecular oscillation in the cerebral clock neurons (Rieger et al., 2009). In fact, the morphological changes in a fly's lamina monopolar cells are known to be affected by the clock gene period (Pyza and Meinerzhagen, 1995).

Fig. 4.

ERG amplitude rhythms in an intact compound eye (A) or compound eyes with severed optic nerves (ONX) (B, C) in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Recording began in the middle (12:00) of the last light fraction of LD 12:12 in which the animal had been held. In (C), the records for 2nd and 3rd days are shown. Note that the ERG rhythm persisted in the compound eye even when the optic nerve was severed (C). The white, gray, and black bars above panels indicate day, subjective day, and subjective night, respectively. For further explanation, see the text.

fi_zs200118_004.jpg

In the cricket, the molecular oscillation seemed to be largely dependent on the efferent control from the optic lobe, since oscillation was weakened by ONX. This is reminiscent of the earlier reports in the cockroach Leucophaea maderae and the carabid beetle Anthia sexguttata (Fleissner, 1982; Wills et al., 1985): The retinal sensitivity rhythm as recorded by ERG is fully dependent on the efferent control from the circadian clock located in the optic lobe and is lost when the compound eye is separated from the optic lobe or when a putative clock site in the optic lobe is lesioned.

Our results showed that in the ONX eye, Gb'per and Gb'cry2 lost their rhythmic expression, while weak but significant rhythms persisted in Gb'tim and Gb'cyc expression under DD, suggesting that there is an intrinsic self-sustaining oscillation within the compound eye. Our findings support the master (pacemaker)-slave clock hypothesis (Pittendrigh, 1981), in that the master clock in the optic lobe governs the slave clock in the compound eye, although the mechanism through which the optic lobe master clock regulates the compound eye slave clock is currently unknown. This master-slave hypothesis is reminiscent of the regulatory systems in cockroach antennal olfactory rhythms and Drosophila eclosion rhythms. In the cockroach L. maderae, antennal olfactory sensory neurons have their own rhythm, but electroantennogram rhythms are highly dependent on the central clock in the optic lobe (Saifullah and Page, 2009). In Drosophila, the cerebral master clock governs the slave clock in the prothoracic gland that controls eclosion (Ito and Tomioka, 2016).

One may argue that the weak rhythmic expression of clock genes in the ONX eye was the result of the desynchronization of retinal clock cells. However, this seems unlikely since the change in mRNA levels occurred soon after the ONX, and the mRNA levels of the clock genes, except for Gb'cry2, were significantly reduced to a level below the trough of intact eyes (Figs. 2 and 3). If the weak rhythms were caused by desynchronization, the mRNA levels would have been at intermediate levels between the peak and the trough.

The weak oscillation in the ONX compound eye probably occurred in the retinal photoreceptor cells, because in situ hybridization revealed Gb'per and Gb'cry2 signals in those cells (Fig. 1). This oscillation may be able to drive the circadian sensitivity rhythm of the photoreceptors in G. bimaculatus, since a weak but significant circadian ERG rhythm persisted even after the optic nerves were severed (Fig. 4C). The most important issue to be addressed in future studies is the determination of the mechanism by which the oscillation in retinal cells regulates circadian oscillation in the retinal sensitivity to light. ERG rhythms are known to be associated with morphological changes such as rhabdom size and screening pigment migration (Sakura et al., 2003). Therefore, it should also be examined whether the weak ERG rhythm in the ONX eye is associated with those morphological changes.

Another important issue is why some of the ONX eyes lost the ERG rhythm (Fig. 4B). One possible explanation is that there are inter-individual differences in the strength of the residual circadian oscillation in compound eyes. An alternative explanation may be that the residual circadian oscillation differs between locations in the compound eye, and the detection of the ERG rhythm depends on the location of the electrode. These possibilities should be examined in future studies.

The molecular oscillation in the ONX compound eye was enhanced and Gb'per was rhythmically expressed under LD 12:12 (Figs. 2 and 3, Table 2), suggesting that light cycles might amplify or enhance gene expression rhythms. One possible mechanism for this enhancement may be that light-evoked changes in membrane potential affect clock gene expression. Neuronal electrical activity is known to induce some immediate early genes (Watanabe et al., 2018; Takayanagi-Kiya and Kiya, 2019), and c-fos is the one that encodes a transcription factor and is known to be involved in the regulation of the clock in G. bimaculatus (Kutaragi et al., 2018). It is also notable that electrical activity plays an essential role to maintain circadian rhythmic expression of clock genes in Drosophila cerebral clock neurons (Nitabach et al., 2005).

Our results clearly revealed that efferent control from the optic lobe plays an important role in the persistence of normal circadian gene expression in the insect compound eye (Figs. 2 and 3). Severance of optic nerves resulted in reduced levels of Gb'per, Gb'tim, Gb'Clk, and Gb'cyc expression, while Gb'cry2 expression was at an intermediate level between the peak and trough of the intact eyes. This fact suggests that efferent control differentially regulates Gb'cry2 and other clock genes. This differential control is consistent with our previous finding that Gb'cry2 forms an oscillatory loop different from the main oscillatory loop consisting of Gb'per and Gb'tim (Tokuoka et al., 2017). The mechanism through which the optic lobe master clock regulates robust circadian gene expressions should be addressed in future studies.

Finally, we should discuss why the compound eye has its own circadian oscillation. The compound eye is known to serve as the circadian photoreceptor necessary for entrainment of the central clock located in the optic lobe (Tomioka and Chiba, 1984; Tomioka et al., 1990; Komada et al., 2015). The photic information is sent to the clock via a neural pathway to reset its phase in a phase-dependent manner (Okada et al., 1991). The present study revealed that together with the central clock in the optic lobe, the circadian oscillator in the eye regulates the circadian light perception rhythm for the efficient phase-resetting or entrainment of the clock. In addition, the eye oscillator may contribute to the establishment of a stable free-running rhythm of the central circadian clock via the reciprocal regulatory pathways, i.e., the efferent control pathway from the central clock to the eye and the entrainment pathway from the eye to the central clock.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Yasuaki Tomiyama and Tsugumichi Shinohara for their assistance in measurement of mRNAs. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for scientific research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H02480) to K. T.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

KT conceived and designed the study. CO performed the qPCR. YM performed ISH. KT performed ERG experiments. CO and KT performed the statistical analysis. KT wrote the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1.

Arikawa K, Morikawa Y, Suzuki T, Eguchi E (1988) Intrinsic control of rhabdom size and rhodopsin content in the crab compound eye by circadian biological clock. Experientia 44: 219–220 Google Scholar

2.

Boulton PS (1969) Degeneration and regeneration in the insect central nervous system. I. Z Zellforsch 101: 98–118 Google Scholar

3.

Cheng Y, Hardin PE (1998) Drosophila photoreceptors contain an autonomous circadian oscillator that can function without period mRNA cycling. J Neurosci 18: 741–750 Google Scholar

4.

Damulewicz M, Loboda A, Bukowska-Strakova K, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J, Pyza E (2015) Clock and clock-controlled genes are differently expressed in the retina, lamina and in selected cells of the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster. Front Cell Neurosci 9: 353 Google Scholar

5.

Danbara Y, Sakamoto T, Uryu O, Tomioka K (2010) RNA interference of timeless gene does not disrupt circadian locomotor rhythms in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Physiol 56: 1738–1745 Google Scholar

6.

Fleissner G (1982) Isolation of an insect circadian clock. J Comp Physiol 149: 311–316 Google Scholar

7.

Giebultowicz JM (2000) Molecular mechanism and cellular distribution of insect circadian clocks. Annu Rev Entomol 45: 769–793 Google Scholar

8.

Glossop NRJ, Lyons LC, Hardin PE (1999) Interlocked feedback loops within the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Science 286: 766–768 Google Scholar

9.

Ito C, Tomioka K (2016) Heterogeneity of the peripheral circadian systems in Drosophila melanogaster: A Review. Front Physiol 7: 8 Google Scholar

10.

Ito C, Goto SG, Shiga S, Tomioka K, Numata H (2008) Peripheral circadian clock for the cuticle deposition rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 8446–8451 Google Scholar

11.

Koehler WK, Fleissner G (1978) Internal desynchronization of bilaterally organized circadian oscillators in the visual system of insects. Nature 274: 708–710 Google Scholar

12.

Komada S, Kamae Y, Koyanagi M, Tatewaki K, Hassaneen E, Saifullah A, et al. (2015) Green-sensitive opsin is the photoreceptor for photic entrainment of an insect circadian clock. Zool Lett 1: 11 Google Scholar

13.

Krishnan P, Chatterjee A, Tanoue S, Hardin PE (2008) Spike amplitude of single-unit responses in antennal sensillae is controlled by the Drosophila circadian clock. Curr Biol 18: 803–807 Google Scholar

14.

Kutaragi Y, Tokuoka A, Tomiyama Y, Nose M, Watanabe T, Bando T, et al. (2018) A novel photic entrainment mechanism for the circadian clock in an insect: involvement of c-fos and cryptochromes. Zool Lett 4: 26 Google Scholar

15.

Lugena AB, Zhang Y, Menet JS, Merlin C (2019) Genome-wide discovery of the daily transcriptome, DNA regulatory elements and transcription factor occupancy in the monarch butterfly brain. PLoS Genetics 15: e1008265 Google Scholar

16.

Meyer-Rochow VB (1999) Compound eye: circadian rhythmicity, illumination, and obscurity. In“Atlas of Arthropod Sensory Receptors: Dynamic Morphology in Relation to Function” Ed by E Eguchi, Y Tominaga, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 97–124 Google Scholar

17.

Moriyama Y, Sakamoto T, Karpova SG, Matsumoto A, Noji S, Tomioka K (2008) RNA interference of the clock gene period disrupts circadian rhythms in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Biol Rhythms 23: 308–318 Google Scholar

18.

Moriyama Y, Kamae Y, Uryu O, Tomioka K (2012) Gb'Clock is expressed in the optic lobe and required for the circadian clock in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Biol Rhythms 27: 467–477 Google Scholar

19.

Nitabach MN, Sheeva V, Vera DA, Blau J, Holmes TC (2005) Membrane electrical excitability is necessary for the free-running larval Drosophila circadian clock. J Neurobiol 62: 1–13 Google Scholar

20.

Okada Y, Tomioka K, Chiba Y (1991) Circadian phase response curves for light in nymphal and adult crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus . J Insect Physiol 37: 583–590 Google Scholar

21.

Page TL (1982) Transplantation of the cockroach circadian pacemaker. Science 216: 73–75 Google Scholar

22.

Pittendrigh CS (1981) Circadian systems: General perspective. In“Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology Vol 4 Biological Rhythms” Ed by J Aschoff, Plenum Press, New York, London, pp 57–80 Google Scholar

23.

Plautz JD, Kaneko M, Hall JC, Kay SA (1997) Independent photoreceptive circadian clocks throughout Drosophila. Science 278: 1632–1635 Google Scholar

24.

Pyza E, Meinerzhagen IA (1995) Day/night size changes in lamina cells are influenced by the period gene in Drosophila. Soc Neurosci Abstr 21: 408 Google Scholar

25.

Rieger D, Wüllbeck C, Rouyer F, Helfrich-Förster C (2009) Period gene expression in four neurons is sufficient for rhythmic activity of Drosophila melanogaster under dim light conditions. J Biol Rhythms 24: 271–282 Google Scholar

26.

Rubin EB, Shemesh Y, Cohen M, Elgavish S, Robertson HM, Bloch G (2006) Molecular and phylogenetic analyses reveal mammalian-like clockwork in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) and shed new light on the molecular evolution of the circadian clock. Genome Res 16: 1352–1365 Google Scholar

27.

Saifullah ASM, Page TL (2009) Circadian regulation of olfactory receptor neurons in the cockroach antenna. J Biol Rhythms 24: 144–152 Google Scholar

28.

Sakura M, Takasuga K, Watanabe M, Eguchi E (2003) Diurnal and circadian rhythm in compound eye of cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus): changes in structure and photon capture efficiency. Zool Sci 20: 833–840 Google Scholar

29.

Sauman I, Reppert SM (1996) Circadian clock neurons in the silk-moth Antheraea pernyi: novel mechanisms of Period protein regulation. Neuron 17: 889–900 Google Scholar

30.

Siwicki KK, Eastman C, Petersen G, Roshbash M, Hall JC (1988) Antibodies to the period gene product of Drosophila reveal diverse tissue distribution and rhythmic changes in the visual system. Neuron 1: 141–150 Google Scholar

31.

Stanewsky R, Kaneko M, Emery P, Beretta B, Wager-Smith K, Kay SA, et al. (1998) The cry b mutation identifies cryptochrome as a circadian photoreceptor in Drosophila. Cell 95: 681–692 Google Scholar

32.

Takayanagi-Kiya S, Kiya T (2019) Activity-dependent visualization and control of neural circuits for courtship behavior in the fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 5715–5720 Google Scholar

33.

Tataroglu O, Emery P (2015) The molecular ticks of the Drosophila circadian clock. Curr Opin Insect Sci 7: 51–57 Google Scholar

34.

Tokuoka A, Itoh TQ, Hori S, Uryu O, Danbara Y, Nose M, et al. (2017) cryptochrome genes form an oscillatory loop independent of the per/tim loop in the circadian clockwork of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Lett 3: 5 Google Scholar

35.

Tomioka K (1985) Optic lobe-compound eye system in cricket: a complete circadian system. J Interdiscipl Cycle Res 16: 73–76 Google Scholar

36.

Tomioka K, Chiba Y (1982) Persistence of circadian ERG rhythms in the cricket with optic tract severed. Sci Nat 69: 355–356 Google Scholar

37.

Tomioka K, Chiba Y (1984) Effects of nymphal stage optic nerve severance or optic lobe removal on the circadian locomotor rhythm of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Sci 1: 375–382 Google Scholar

38.

Tomioka K, Chiba Y (1992) Characterization of an optic lobe circadian pacemaker by in situ and in vitro recording of neuronal activity in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 171: 1–7 Google Scholar

39.

Tomioka K, Matsumoto A (2010) A comparative view of insect circadian clocks. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 1397–1406 Google Scholar

40.

Tomioka K, Matsumoto A (2015) Circadian molecular clockworks in non-model insects. Curr Opin Insect Sci 7: 58–64 Google Scholar

41.

Tomioka K, Matsumoto A (2019) Chapter Three - The circadian system in insects: Cellular, molecular, and functional organization. Adv Insect Physiol 56: 73–115 Google Scholar

42.

Tomioka K, Okada Y, Chiba Y (1990) Distribution of circadian photoreceptors in the compound eye of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Biol Rhythms 5: 131–139 Google Scholar

43.

Tomioka K, Uryu O, Kamae Y, Umezaki Y, Yoshii T (2012) Peripheral circadian rhythms and their regulatory mechanism in insects and some other arthropods: a review. J Comp Physiol B 182: 729–740 Google Scholar

44.

Uryu O, Tomioka K (2010) Circadian oscillations outside the optic lobe in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Physiol 56: 1284–1290 Google Scholar

45.

Uryu O, Karpova SG, Tomioka K (2013) The clock gene cycle plays an important role in the circadian clock of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Physiol 59: 697–704 Google Scholar

46.

Watanabe T, Ugajin A, Aonuma H (2018) Immediate-early promoter-driven transgenic reporter system for neuroethological research in a hemimetabolous insect. eNeuro 5: ENEURO.0061–0018.2018 Google Scholar

47.

Weber F (1995) Cyclic layer deposition in the cockroach (Blaberus craniifer) eondocuticle: a circadian rhythm in leg pieces cultured in vitro. J Insect Physiol 41: 153–161 Google Scholar

48.

Wills SA, Page TL, Colwell CS (1985) Circadian rhythms in the electroretinogram of the cockroach. J Biol Rhythms 1: 25–37 Google Scholar

49.

Zhu H, Sauman I, Yuan Q, Casselman A, Emery-Le M, Emery P, et al. (2008) Cryptochromes define a novel circadian clock mechanism in monarch butterflies that may underlie sun compass navigation. PLoS Biol 6: e4 Google Scholar
© 2021 Zoological Society of Japan
Chikako Ohguro, Yoshiyuki Moriyama, and Kenji Tomioka "The Compound Eye Possesses a Self-Sustaining Circadian Oscillator in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus," Zoological Science 38(1), 82-89, (24 November 2020). https://doi.org/10.2108/zs200118
Received: 17 July 2020; Accepted: 28 August 2020; Published: 24 November 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
circadian oscillator
clock genes
compound eye
cricket
ERG rhythms
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top