Translator Disclaimer
14 June 2019 Odorant-Binding Protein 2 is Involved in the Preference of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) for Rice Plants Infected with the Southern Rice Black-Streaked Dwarf Virus
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus, transmitted by the white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera [Horváth]) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) was first found in Guangdong Province, China. A previous study has demonstrated that the host plant preferences of S. furcifera are altered by infection with the virus, with virus-free S. furcifera preferring virus-infected rice plants over healthy rice plants, whereas viruliferous S. furcifera prefer uninfected plants. To test the hypothesis that odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) are involved in the preference of S. furcifera for virus-infected rice plants, we first compared the expression levels of SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11 in virus-free and viruliferous S. furcifera. The results show that mRNA transcript of these 2 genes were significantly reduced in viruliferous S. furcifera. We then used RNAi-mediated gene silencing to confirm the function of these 2 odorant-binding proteins in host selection of S. furcifera. The results showed that silencing of the SfurOBP2 gene caused virus-free S. furcifera to no longer prefer virus-infected rice plants over uninfected rice plants, but the ability to locate host plants was maintained. These results indicate that SfurOBP2 appears to play a crucial role in the preference of S. furcifera for virus-infected rice plants.

Ecosystems containing plants, plant pathogens, and insect vectors are characterized by complex interactions (Stout et al. 2006; Lu et al. 2016). For example, some plant viruses have pathogenic effects on the development and fecundity of insect vectors (Czosnek & Ghanim 2012), and also can modify the host selection behavior of their vectors directly or indirectly. Previously documented examples showed enhanced attractiveness of insect vectors to virus-infected plant hosts compared to healthy plant hosts (Alvarez et al. 2007; Mauck et al. 2010a, b; McMenemy et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2013). The first evidence that acquisition of a plant virus directly alters host selection behavior by its insect vector showed that virus-free Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) aphids preferred Barley yellow dwarf virus-infected wheat plants compared to healthy plants, whereas the aphids that had acquired virus during feeding preferred noninfected plants (Ingwell et al. 2012). More recently, the rice pest white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera [Horváth]) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) (Hoang et al. 2011; Matsukura et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2013), was shown to transmit Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus in a persistent propagative manner (Zhou et al. 2008; Pu et al. 2012). Further, it was shown that virus-free S. furcifera significantly prefer virus-infected rice plants to healthy plants. In contrast, viruliferous S. furcifera prefer healthy plants over infected plants (Wang et al. 2014). Previous works on the vector-virus-plant interaction focused on the feeding behavior, development, and fecundity of S. furcifera (Tu et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2014; Lei et al. 2016), and the changes in the nutrients composition and the volatiles emission of rice plants after the infection of the virus (He et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017). However, limited research analyzed the mechanism through which the virus affects the S. furcifera host plant preferences.

Olfaction plays a crucial role in guiding insects to find food sources, mating partners, and oviposition sites. Insects detect and locate food sources for reproduction based on the volatile chemical signals emitted from the host plants (Anfora et al. 2009; Allmann et al. 2013). Generally, odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) are the first proteins that interact with odors in the sensillum lymph when odors enter olfactory sensilla (Acín et al. 2009). Convincing evidence has documented that odorant-binding proteins participate in the olfactory perception in the insect. For instance, RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of LmigOBP1 in Locusta migratoria (L.) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) abolished electrophysiological responses by locusts to maize leaf volatiles (Li et al. 2016). Analogous results have been obtained in Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), wherein blocking of BdorOBP83a-2 decreased the behavioral responses to attractant semiochemicals (Wu et al. 2016). Researchers have also proposed that odorant-binding proteins play a role in host plant choice, and it has been demonstrated that OBP57d and OBP57e are implicated in the host plant preference of Drosophila sechellia Tsacas and Baechli (Diptera: Drosophilidae) (Matsuo et al. 2007).

Ten odorant-binding proteins have been identified recently in the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stål) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) (He et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2014), and the results of RNAi experiments show that NlugOBP3 is involved in nymph olfaction on rice plants (He et al. 2011). In S. furcifera, 12 SfurOBP genes have been identified, and the relative expression of 2 of them, SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11, was found to be significantly higher than those of other SfurOBPs in the antennae (He & He 2014). Little is known, however, about the role of SfurOBPs in S. furcifera host selection, especially the role of SfurOBPs in the preference of virus-free S. furcifera for virus-infected rice plants vs. healthy rice plants.

Generally, the antennae are the most important olfactory organ for the insect (Vogt & Riddiford 1981). To test our hypothesis that SfurOB-Ps are involved in the preference of virus-free S. furcifera for virus-infected rice plants, we measured the expression levels of SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11 in antennae-enriched genes in virus-free and viruliferous S. furcifera. We then used RNAi technology to knockdown SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11 with dsRNA (dsOBP2 and dsOBP11). At 24 h after the dsRNA injection, we tested the behavioral responses of S. furcifera for air (empty pot with soil), healthy plants, and virus-infected rice plants by using a glass Y-tube olfactometer.

Table 1.

PCR primers used in this study.

t01_353.gif

Materials and Methods

INSECT REARING AND VIRUS-INFECTED PLANTS

The rice used in this study (cultivar ‘Fengyuanyou 299′) was purchased from Hunan Longping Seed Industry Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan Province, China. Sogatella furcifera were collected from rice fields in Changsha, Hunan Province, China, and reared in the laboratory with healthy rice plants for more than 3 generations at 26 ± 1 °C, 85% RH, under a 16: 8 h (L: D) photoperiod. Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus-infected rice plants were kindly provided by Guohui Zhou (South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China). The inoculated plants were subjected to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as described previously (Wang et al. 2014).

COLLECTION OF ANTENNAE OF VIRUS-FREE AND VIRULIFEROUS PLANTHOPPERS

Newly hatched white-backed planthopper nymphs were reared on healthy or virus-infected rice plants. After the nymphs had developed into adults for 2 d, RT-PCR was used to confirm the presence of the virus in the viruliferous insects as described previously (Wang et al. 2014). The antennae of virus-free and viruliferous S. furcifera adults were collected and stored at -80 °C until further use. Approximately 200 antennae for each replicate were analyzed and 3 replicates for each treatment were done.

DSRNA SYNTHESIS

For dsRNA synthesis, the gene-specific primers conjugated with the T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence (Table 1) were designed from the sequences (SfurOBP2, accession No. KF660218; SfurOBP11, accession No. KF732020), and were used to amplify target regions (SfurOBP2, 451 bp; SfurOBP11, 549 bp). The 441 bp segment of enhanced green fluorescent protein gene (EGFP, accession No. U55762) was amplified as a negative control. The dsRNA was synthesized using the T7 RiboMAX™ Express RNAi System, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The synthesized dsRNAs were individually isopropanol precipitated, resuspended in RNase-free water, and quantified by a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop™ 1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, Delaware, USA) at 260 nm. The purity and integrity were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. The dsRNA solution was stored at -80 °C.

dSRNA DELIVERY BY INJECTION

Four treatments, namely RNase-free water (control), dsEGFP, dsOBP2 and dsOBP11, were established. We injected 50 nL dsRNA (2000 ng per μL) into the membrane between the meso- and meta-thoracic legs of the CO2 anesthetized 1-d-old virus-free S. furcifera adults using a Nanoinjector (Drummond Scientific, Broomall, Pennsylvania, USA). Three replicates (40 adults for each replicate) were carried out for each treatment. The injected adults were placed on the healthy rice seedlings at 26 ± 1 °C, 85% RH, with a 16: 8 h (L: D) photoperiod.

The host orientation preference of each S. furcifera was tested at 24 h after injection, and 10 individuals were randomly collected from each replicate to analyze the effectiveness of silencing the target genes.

HOST ORIENTATION PREFERENCE TEST

Three host orientation preference trials were performed; 1 experiment compared the behavioral response of S. furcifera for healthy or virus-infected rice plants; another experiment tested the behavioral response of S. furcifera for healthy rice plants or air (empty pot with soil); the last experiment tested the behavioral response of S. furcifera for virus-infected rice plants or air. The experiments were performed by a two-choice bioassay using the glass Y-tube olfactometer (one 13-cm stem and two 10-cm branched arms, 60° between 2 arms, 2 cm diam) as described by Wang et al. (2014). The Y-tube was placed horizontally in an airtight box (70 × 45 × 30 cm), and lighted from 25 cm above by a 25-W filament lamp. The rice plants (80 d after planting) or air were enclosed in the odor bottles (50 cm in height, 25 cm inner diam) that connected to the arms of the Y-tube. Air that was filtered through activated charcoal and humidified with doubly distilled water was pumped into both arms at a flow rate of 300 mL per min. A planthopper adult (starved for 1 h) was randomly chosen and placed in the stem of the Y-tube. Each insect was given 10 min to choose between the 2 arms of the Y-tube. The insect choice was noted if the planthopper reached one-half the length of an arm and stayed in the arm for more than 1 min. The behavioral trials were conducted in an environmentally controlled room (25 ± 1 °C and 50% RH). For each treatment, a chi-square test was used to detect the differences in insect orientation preferences between the 2 odor cues using SPSS19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

QUANTITATIVE RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) ASSAY

Total RNA was isolated using the MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and first-strand cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's instruction.

The expression levels of SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11 were evaluated using qRT-PCR. All qPCR samples were run in triplicate using a CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA) and TB Green Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The S. furcifera α-1 tubulin (TUB, accession No. KP735521) and elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α, accession No. KP735517) were used as the internal references as suggested by a previous study (An et al. 2016). The qPCR primers of SfurOBP2, SfurOBP11, TUB and EF1-α were designed by using the National Center for Biotechnology Information profile server ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast). A 5-fold dilution series of cDNA was used to generate a standard curve to determine efficiency of each primer pair. The primers and amplification efficiency are shown in Table 1.

Gene expression data were analyzed using 2-ΔΔCt method (Livak & Schmittgen 2001; Pfaffl 2001), the geometric mean of the 2 internal control genes was used for normalization. Student's t-test was used to analyze the differences of SfurOBPs (SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11) expression levels in virus-free and viruliferous S. furcifera, and difference between treatment means were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA.

Results

EXPRESSION LEVELS OF SFUROBP2 AND SFUROBP11 IN THE ANTENNAE OF SOGATELLA FURCIFERA

In this research, qRT-PCR was used to investigate the expression levels of SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11 post-viral infection in the antennae of S. furcifera adults. As shown in Figure 1, the expression level of SfurOBP2 was reduced by 52.7% in the antennae of viruliferous S. furcifera (t = 11.335; df = 2; P < 0.01), and the expression level of SfurOBP11 was reduced by 52.5% in the antennae of viruliferous S. furcifera (t = 5.462; df = 2; P < 0.05).

EFFECT OF RNAI TREATMENT ON SFUROBP2 AND SFUROBP11 TRANSCRIPT LEVELS

RNAi technology was used to reduce the expression of candidate genes potentially involved in host preferences of S. furcifera. At 24 h after injection of dsOBP2 and dsOBP11, the transcript levels of SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11 in the treated virus-free S. furcifera adults were reduced by 68.6% (F = 16.176; df = 2, 6; P < 0.01) and 85.2% (F = 26.527; df = 2, 6; P < 0.01), respectively, relative to the expression in insect controls injected with water (Fig. 2A, B).

Fig. 1.

Expression profiles of SfurOBP2 and SfurOBP11 in the antennae of virus-free and viruliferous S. furcifera. VFA: virus-free antennae; VIA: virus-infected antennae. The histogram bars represent mean ± SE of 3 biological replicates. Asterisk above bars indicate significant differences (t-test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

f01_353.jpg

Fig. 2.

Detection of the mRNA levels after RNA interference. The histogram bars represent mean ± SE of 3 biological replicates. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (1-way ANOVA: P < 0.01). (A) mRNA levels of SfurOBP2 in S. furcifera injected with different dsRNA. RNase-free water injection (Control), EGFP-dsRNA (dsEGFP), SfurOBP2-dsRNA (dsOBP2). (B) mRNA levels of SfurOBP11 in S. furcifera injected with different dsRNA. RNase-free water injection (control), EGFP-dsRNA (dsEGFP), SfurOBP11-dsRNA (dsOBP11).

f02_353.jpg

HOST PLANT SELECTION BEHAVIOR OF SOGATELLA FURCIFERA

Twenty-four hours after injection of dsRNA, a glass Y-tube olfactometer was used to test the host plant selection behavior of dsRNA treated virus-free S. furcifera for air, healthy, and virus-infected rice plants. The results revealed that S. furcifera treated with RNase-free water and dsEGFP did not change their behavior, and preferred virus-infected rice plants when subjected simultaneously to healthy plants (χ2 = 13.333; df = 1; P < 0.01, and χ2 = 9.227; df = 1; P < 0.01, respectively) (Fig. 3A). In contrast, there was no significant difference (χ2 = 0.180; df = 1; P = 0.671 for dsOBP2, and χ2 = 0.321; df = 1; P = 0.571 for dsOBP11) in the preference of insects for infected plants when the SfurOPB-2 or -11 were silenced (Fig. 3A). When the dsRNA-treated S. furcifera were subjected to healthy or infected plants and air, the control, dsEGFP and dsOBP2 were significantly attracted to the rice plants whatever their infection status (infected χ2 = 12.224; df = 1; P < 0.01, or non-infected χ2 = 14.500; df = 1; P < 0.01 for dsOBP2) rather than air (Fig. 3B, C). Furthermore, the dsOBP11 treated S. furcifera did not significantly prefer healthy (χ2 = 0.723; df = 1; P = 0.395) or infected rice plants (χ2 = 0.321; df = 1; P = 0.571) when subjected simultaneously to air (Fig. 3B, C).

Fig. 3.

Effects of RNAi of SfurOBP-2 or -11 on the preferences of S. furcifera for healthy, virus-infected rice plants or air (empty pot with soil). The data of non-responding insects were given on the right of the bar in the figure. Double asterisks indicate statistically significant difference (chi-square test: **P < 0.01), NS indicates no significant difference. (A) S. furcifera choice tests between healthy or infected rice plants after injection of dsRNA or water (Control); (B) S. furcifera choice tests between healthy rice plants or air after injection of dsRNA or water (Control); (C) S. furcifera choice tests between virus-infected rice plants or air after injection of dsRNA or water (control).

f03_353.jpg

Discussion

Olfaction plays a critical role in numerous insect behaviors (Liu et al. 2012; Chang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017), and odorant-binding proteins play a key role in host plant choice and oviposition in insects (Hallem et al. 2006; Matsuo et al. 2007; Pelosi et al. 2018). In this study, we found that the transcription level of SfurOBP2 was significantly reduced in the antennae of viruliferous S. furcifera, and that after silencing the SfurOBP2 gene, virus-free S. furcifera no longer displayed significant preference for virus-infected rice plants; however, the host-seeking ability of S. furcifera was not affected. Taken together, we propose that SfurOBP2 is one of the key odorant-binding proteins responsible for the preference of S. furcifera for virus-infected rice plants. Actually, the SfurOBP2 gene is expressed preferentially in antennae (He & He 2014), and experiments on the binding properties of odorant-binding proteins indicate that SfurOBP2 has a relatively high affinity for the rice plant volatiles 2-tridecanone and β-ionone (He & He 2014), these results suggest that SfurOBP2 plays a crucial role in the planthopper's ability to discriminate between host plants.

The preference of the dsOBP2-treated individuals did not completely shift to healthy rice plants, which implied that some other SfurOBPs may play a role in determining the host preference of the S. furcifera, similarly as SfurOBP2. In fact, previous research has shown that the interactions of CmedOBP2 and CmedOBP3 have significant effects on the ability of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to detect host plant volatiles (Sun et al. 2016). However, further research is required to identify these SfurOBPs. Furthermore, SfurOBP2 also is highly expressed in the abdomen, and there was lower homology (11.9%–25.7%) among SfurOBP2 and other SfurOBPs at the amino acid level (He & He 2014), these characteristics of SfurOBP2 may make a contribution to the special function.

Volatile chemical signals from host plants provide important cues for various insects to detect and locate appropriate host plants for reproduction (Anfora et al. 2009; Tasin et al. 2010; Allmann et al. 2013). Differences in the relative contents and composition of volatiles produced by healthy and virus-infected rice plants have been detected (He et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017). However, the specific compounds playing a role in the behavior of S. furcifera for healthy and virus-infected rice plants have not yet been obtained. Furthermore, the composition of volatiles seems to differ greatly between different rice species (Wang et al. 2017). The behavioral responses of S. furcifera to healthy and virus-infected rice plants does not vary due to the different cultivars of the rice plant (preliminary tests), implying that it is more the relative content than the composition of volatiles that are involved. Discovery of the special function of SfurOBP2 means that binding assays of this protein to the volatiles showed a difference between healthy and virus-infected rice plants, and the behavior of S. furcifera for these changed volatiles after knockdown of SfurOBP2 can be used to determine the volatiles that influence host plant choice of S. furcifera.

In this study, the S. furcifera did not significantly prefer virus-infected rice after SfurOBP11 gene silencing by RNAi. In addition, when faced with the choice between healthy or infected rice plants and air, there was no significant difference between rice plants and air. These results led us to speculate that SfurOBP11 is involved in the host plant location but not in the recognition of healthy and virus-infected rice plants. In fact, previous research has demonstrated already that silencing of SfurOBP11 significantly reduced the number of nymphs attracted to rice plants (Jiang et al. 2016). Our results reinforce the role of SfurOBP11 in the recognition of rice plants in S. furcifera.

In addition, our results provide additional evidence that plant viruses can influence the behavior of insect virus vectors (Ingwell et al. 2012; Moreno-Delafuente et al. 2013). Research on the influence of plant viruses on the olfactory system of vectors provides a new perspective for understanding the mechanisms through which these viruses modify vector feeding behavior.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31572005), Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (15A090), and Hunan Provincial Postgraduate Research and Innovation Project of China (CX2017B350).

References Cited

1.

Acín P, Carrascal M, Abián J, Guerrero A, Quero C. 2009. Expression of differential antennal proteins in males and females of an important crop pest, Sesamia nonagrioides.Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology39: 11–19. Google Scholar

2.

Allmann S, Späthe A, Bisch-Knaden S, Kallenbach M, Reinecke A, Sachse S, Baldwin IT, Hansson BS. 2013. Feeding-induced rearrangement of green leaf volatiles reduces moth oviposition.Elife2: e00421. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00421 Google Scholar

3.

Alvarez AE, Garzo E, Verbeek M, Vosman B, Dicke M, Tjallingii WF. 2007. Infection of potato plants with potato leafroll virus changes attraction and feeding behaviour of Myzus persicae.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata125: 135–144. Google Scholar

4.

An XK, Hou ML, Liu YD. 2016. Reference gene selection and evaluation for gene expression studies using qRT-PCR in the white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae).Journal of Economic Entomology109: 879–886. Google Scholar

5.

Anfora G, Tasin M, De CA, Ioriatti C, Lucchi A. 2009. Synthetic grape volatiles attract mated Lobesia botrana females in laboratory and field bioassays.Journal of Chemical Ecology35: 1054–1062. Google Scholar

6.

Chang H, Liu Y, Ai D, Jiang X, Dong S, Wang G. 2017. A pheromone antagonist regulates optimal mating time in the moth Helicoverpa armigera.Current Biology27: 1610–1615. Google Scholar

7.

Czosnek H, Ghanim M. 2012. Back to basics: are begomoviruses whitefly pathogens?Journal of Integrative Agriculture11: 225–234. Google Scholar

8.

Hallem E, Dahanukar A, Carlson JR. 2006. Insect odor and taste receptors.Annual Review of Entomology51: 113–135. Google Scholar

9.

He M, He P. 2014. Molecular characterization, expression profiling, and binding properties of odorant binding protein genes in the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology174: 1–8. Google Scholar

10.

He X, Xu H, Gao G, Zhou X, Zheng X, Sun Y, Yang Y, Tian J, Lu Z. 2014. Virus-mediated chemical changes in rice plants impact the relationship between non-vector planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Stål and its egg parasitoid Anagrus nilaparvatae Pang et Wang.PLoS One9: e105373. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0105373 Google Scholar

11.

He P, Zhang J, Liu NY, Zhang YN, Yang K, Dong SL. 2011. Distinct expression profiles and different functions of odorant binding proteins in Nilaparvata lugens Stål.PLoS One6: e28921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028921 Google Scholar

12.

Hoang AT, Zhang HM, Yang J, Chen JP, Hébrard E, Zhou GH, Vinh VN, Cheng JA. 2011. Identification, characterization, and distribution of Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus in Vietnam.Plant Disease95: 1063–1069. Google Scholar

13.

Ingwell LL, Eigenbrode SD, Bosquepérez NA. 2012. Plant viruses alter insect behavior to enhance their spread.Scientific Reports2: 578. doi: 10.1038/srep00578 Google Scholar

14.

Jiang YD, Liang QM, Bai YL, Zhou WW, Liu S, Wang GH, Zhu ZR. 2016. The relationship between odorant binding proteins and host locating behavior in Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae).Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology53: 463–471. Google Scholar

15.

Lei W, Li P, Han Y, Gong S, Yang L, Hou M. 2016. EPG recordings reveal differential feeding behaviors in Sogatella furcifera in response to plant virus infection and transmission success.Scientific Reports6: 30240. doi: 10.1038/srep30240 Google Scholar

16.

Li J, Zhang L, Wang X. 2016. An odorant-binding protein involved in perception of host plant odorants in locust Locusta migratoria.Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology91: 221–229. Google Scholar

17.

Liu B, Preisser EL, Chu D, Pan H, Xie W, Wang S, Wu Q, Zhou X, Zhang Y. 2013. Multiple forms of vector manipulation by a plant-infecting virus: Bemisia tabaci and Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus.Journal of Virology87: 4929–4937. Google Scholar

18.

Liu R, He X, Lehane S, Lehane M, Hertz-Fowler C, Berriman M, Field LM, Zhou JJ. 2012. Expression of chemosensory proteins in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans is related to female host-seeking behaviour.Insect Molecular Biology21: 41–48. Google Scholar

19.

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method.Methods25: 402–408. Google Scholar

20.

Lu G, Zhang T, He Y, Zhou G. 2016. Virus altered rice attractiveness to planthoppers is mediated by volatiles and related to virus titre and expression of defence and volatile-biosynthesis genes.Scientific Reports6: 38581. doi: 10.1038/srep38581 Google Scholar

21.

Matsukura K, Towata T, Sakai J, Onuki M, Okuda M, Matsumura M. 2013. Dynamics of Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus in rice and implication for virus acquisition.Phytopathology103: 509–512. Google Scholar

22.

Matsuo T, Sugaya S, Yasukawa J, Aigaki T, Fuyama Y. 2007. Odorant-binding proteins OBP57d and OBP57e affect taste perception and host-plant preference in Drosophila sechellia.PLoS Biology5: 985–996. Google Scholar

23.

Mauck KE, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC. 2010a. Effects of Cucumber mosaic virus infection on vector and non-vector herbivores of squash.Communicative & Integrative Biology3: 579–582. Google Scholar

24.

Mauck KE, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC. 2010b. Deceptive chemical signals induced by a plant virus attract insect vectors to inferior hosts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America107: 3600–3605. Google Scholar

25.

McMenemy LS, Hartley SE, MacFarlane SA, Karley AJ, Shepherd T, Johnson SN. 2012. Raspberry viruses manipulate the behaviour of their insect vectors.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata144: 56–68. Google Scholar

26.

Moreno-Delafuente A, Garzo E, Moreno A, Fereres A. 2013. A plant virus manipulates the behavior of its whitefly vector to enhance its transmission efficiency and spread.PLoS One8: e61543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061543 Google Scholar

27.

Pelosi P, Iovinella I, Zhu J, Wang G, Dani FR. 2018. Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects.Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society93: 184–200. Google Scholar

28.

Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR.Nucleic Acids Research29: 45. Google Scholar

29.

Pu LL, Xie GH, Ji CY, Ling B, Zhang MX, Xu DL, Zhou GH. 2012. Transmission characteristics of Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus by rice planthoppers.Crop Protection41: 71–76. Google Scholar

30.

Stout MJ, Thaler JS, Thomma BPHJ. 2006. Plant-mediated interactions between pathogenic microorganisms and herbivorous arthropods.Annual Review of Entomology51: 663–689. Google Scholar

31.

Sun X, Zeng FF, Yan MJ, Zhang A, Lu ZX, Wang MQ. 2016. Interactions of two odorant-binding proteins influence insect chemoreception.Insect Molecular Biology25: 712–723. Google Scholar

32.

Tasin M, Bäckman AC, Anfora G, Carlin S, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P. 2010. Attraction of female grapevine moth to common and specific olfactory cues from 2 host plants.Chemical Senses35: 57–64. Google Scholar

33.

Tu Z, Ling B, Xu D, Zhang M, Zhou G. 2013. Effects of Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus on the development and fecundity of its vector, Sogatella furcifera.Virology Journal10: 145. doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-145 Google Scholar

34.

Vogt RG, Riddiford LM. 1981. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae.Nature293: 161–163. Google Scholar

35.

Wang L, Hu K, He H, Ding W, Li Y. 2017. Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus-induced volatiles from rice plants and behavioral responses of adult Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) to the components of these volatiles.Acta Entomology Sinica60: 412–420. Google Scholar

36.

Wang H, Xu D, Pu L, Zhou G. 2014. Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus alters insect vectors' host orientation preferences to enhance spread and increase rice ragged stunt virus co-infection.Phytopathology104: 196–201. Google Scholar

37.

Wu Z, Lin J, Zhang H, Zeng X. 2016. BdorOBP83a-2 mediates responses of the oriental fruit fly to semiochemicals.Frontiers in Physiology7: 452. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00452 Google Scholar

38.

Xu, H, He X, Zheng X, Yang Y, Tian J, Lu Z. 2014. Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus (SRBSDV) directly affects the feeding and reproduction behavior of its vector, Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae).Virology Journal11: 55. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-11-55 Google Scholar

39.

Zhang R, Wang B, Grossi G, Falabella P, Liu Y, Yan S, Lu J, Xi J, Wang G. 2017. Molecular basis of alarm pheromone detection in aphids.Current Biology27: 55–61. Google Scholar

40.

Zhou G, Wen J, Cai D, Li P, Xu D, Zhang S. 2008. Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus: a new proposed fijivirus species in the family Reoviridae.Chinese Science Bulletin53: 3677–3685. Google Scholar

41.

Zhou G, Xu D, Xu D, Zhang M. 2013. Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus: a white-backed planthopper-transmitted fijivirus threatening rice production in Asia.Frontiers in Microbiology4: 270. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00270 Google Scholar

42.

Zhou SS, Sun Z, Ma W, Chen W, Wang MQ. 2014. De novo analysis of the Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) antenna transcriptome and expression patterns of olfactory genes.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics9: 31–39.` Google Scholar
Kui Hu, Houhong Yang, Sheng Liu, Hualiang He, Wenbing Ding, Lin Qiu, and Youzhi Li "Odorant-Binding Protein 2 is Involved in the Preference of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) for Rice Plants Infected with the Southern Rice Black-Streaked Dwarf Virus," Florida Entomologist 102(2), 353-358, (14 June 2019). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0210
Published: 14 June 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top