Although the search for the drivers of amphibian declines continues, there is a need to implement conservation actions. Conservation science usually does not deliver clear answers about which conservation actions are most effective and which ones should be implemented. Furthermore, results often cannot be used directly by conservationists. Given that resources are limited, there is a need to know which conservation actions and management interventions are most likely to succeed. The goal of evidence-based conservation is to assess the effectiveness of conservation actions qualitatively and quantitatively, and comparative effectiveness studies are a powerful tool to evaluate different conservation actions. We use a case study on toad tunnels to discuss the benefits and limitations of comparative effectiveness studies. Although we show that wider tunnels are used by a higher proportion of individuals, the strength of evidence for effects of other characteristics of amphibian tunnels on tunnel use was weak. Despite some equivocal results, our case study illustrates that the approach can readily be used to study the effectiveness of conservation actions and to derive recommendations for conservationists and managers that can be used directly to improve future conservation interventions.
How to translate text using browser tools
23 June 2020
Evidence-Based Amphibian Conservation: A Case Study on Toad Tunnels
Benedikt R. Schmidt,
Stephan Brenneisen,
Silvia Zumbach
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
![](/ContentImages/journals/herp/76/2/2/WebImages/147.76.0200.cover.jpg)
Herpetologica
Vol. 76 • No. 2
June 2020
Vol. 76 • No. 2
June 2020
Amphibian tunnels
Bufo bufo
Conservation action
conservation evidence
mitigation
POPULATION GROWTH
Rana temporaria