Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2013 Insecticide Susceptibility of Field-Collected Populations of Culex tritaeniorhynchus in the Republic of Korea
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The toxicities of 10 insecticides were examined against late third instar Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) using the direct-contact mortality bioassay. Six geospatially-distant field mosquitoes were collected from Chuncheon-si, Hwaseong, Seosan. Jeonju, Daegu, and Busan in the Republic of Korea. Marked regional variations of insecticide susceptibility were observed. Field populations of Seosan, Jeonju, and Daegu from agricultural areas showed higher to extremely higher insecticide susceptibility to pyrethroids than those of Chuncheon-si, Hwaseong, and Busan strains from non-agricultural areas. Extremely high to low levels of susceptibility were measured: bifenthrin, susceptible ratio (SR) = 2.7–896.3; β-cyfluthrin, SR = 1.8–633.3; α-cypermethrin, SR = 1.2–1,051.9; deltamethrin, SR = 1.3–711.1; permethrin, SR = 1.5–1,053.4; etofenprox, SR = 2.2–29.3; chlorfenapyr, SR = 5.1–103.6; chlorpyrifos, SR = 2.3– 337.0; fenitrothion, SR = 2.0–142.3; and fenthion, SR = 1.4–186.2. Cx. tritaeniorhynchus populations from rice paddies had been under heavy selection pressure due to the agricultural insecticides, and that's why the mosquito species demonstrated high resistance to pyrethroids, which were used for a long time to control agricultural pests in the localities. These results indicate that careful selection and rotational use of these insecticides may result in continued satisfactory control against field populations of Japanese encephalitis vector mosquitoes.

Introduction

Japanese encephalitis (JE) is a vector-borne viral disease that occurs in South Asia, Southeast Asia, the Pacific, and East Asia, including the Republic of Korea (ROK) (Solomon 2006). As late as 1982, 1197 cases of JE were reported in the ROK, when the vaccination rate was 45.7% (Sohn 2000). However, government-mandated vaccination and vector-control programs decreased JE in the ROK to 6–7 cases reported annually over the last two decades, except for the recent outbreak of 26 cases in 2010 (Center for Disease Control and Prevention/Korea 2012). Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) is the major vector of JE in the ROK (Burke and Leake 1988; Vaughn and Hoke 1992; Khan et al. 1996). Because Cx. tritaeniorhynchus breeds mainly in paddy fields, it is under heavy selection pressure with agricultural applications of insecticides and other pesticides sprayed on the rice fields. This selection pressure has resulted in the development of insecticide resistance (Shim et al. 1995a; Karunaratne and Hemingway 2000; Erlanger et al. 2009; Shin et al. 2011). Agricultural insecticide treatment can exert a selective pressure on both the larval and adult stages of vectors. Some of the breeding sites created by agricultural practices in rice fields and by irrigation schemes are sprayed directly. When agricultural breeding sites are treated, all the mosquito larvae are subjected to selective pressure, which is more likely to induce resistance than when houses are sprayed for mosquito control. Insecticides sprayed in crop fields can be carried by wind to nearby mosquito breeding sites. Finally, rains can wash pesticides applied on crops and drain them into ground pools or ditches where mosquito larvae breed. Adult mosquitoes have been observed resting on treated rice. In the ROK, rice-field-collected mosquito populations have developed locally unique insecticide resistances according to the long-term insecticides used in the region (Shim et al. 1982; Shim et al. 1995b; Chang et al. 2009; Shin et al. 2011).

In the ROK, the local public health centers have controlled mosquitoes, but they have not considered the insecticide resistance of vector mosquitoes and have used various insecticides. As vector mosquitoes obtain insecticide resistance, more insecticides may be applied, which can cause human and environmental health problems. The widespread use of commonly used less expensive insecticides has been a major obstacle in implementing cost-effective and safe integrated programs for mosquito management. In the ROK, 26 cases of JE occurred in 2010 (Center for Disease Control and Prevention/Korea 2012), but little monitoring of local insecticide resistance of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus has been performed for integrated vector mosquito control in the last 5 years.

Here, the resistance patterns of 10 currently used insecticides against six geospatially-distant field-collected populations of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus are reported. To estimate insecticide resistance of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus to agricultural pesticides, the resistance levels of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus collected from rice-field and non-rice-field areas were tested and compared.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

The following ten insecticides were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich ( http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/) and were used in this study: bifenthrin (97.0% purity), β-cyfluthrin (98.0%), α-cypermethrin (97.5%), deltamethrin (99.5%), etofenprox (96.5%), permethrin (95.5%), chlorpyrifos (98.5%), fenthion (95.5%), fenitrothion (98.5%), and chlorfenapyr (99.0%). Triton X-100 was obtained from Shinyo Pure Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). All other chemicals used were analytical grade and available commercially.

Mosquitoes

Six different colonies of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus were established from larvae collected near rice paddy fields and cow sheds in Chuncheon (designated CC-CT; 37° 52′ 56.19″ N, 127° 46′ 12.16″ E), Hwaseong (HS-CT; 37° 12′ 18.40″ N, 126° 50′ 53.19″ E), Busan (BS-CT; 35° 12′ 21.73″ N, 129° 12′ 5.31″ E), Seosan (SS-CT; 36° 42′ 27.49″ N, 126° 28′ 23.97″ E), Jeonju (JJ-CT; 35° 54′ 54.63″ N, 127° 0′ 31.23″ E), and Daegu (DG-CT; 36° 8′ 47.78″ N, 128° 21′ 57.27″ E) from early August to mid-September 2011 (Figure 1). Field strains of CC-CT and HS-CT were collected from small swamps near hog barns, which were surrounded by mountains and at least 3km from a farming village. The BS-CT collection site was an area of small swamps near a hog barn along an urban area, and was surrounded by factories. Field strains of SS-CT, JJ-CT, and DG-CT were collected from small swamps near hog barns, which were surrounded by rice paddies and far from villages. The collected larvae were transferred to an insect rearing room at the Korean National Institute of Health Larvae were reared in plastic trays (27 × 15 × 4 cm) containing 0.5 g of sterilized diet (Vivid S:Super Terramin, 4:1 by weight) (Sewhapet,  http://sewhapet.en.ec21.com/). Adult mosquitoes were maintained on a 10% sucrose solution, and were allowed to blood-feed on mice under an approved animal use protocol. All cages were maintained at 27 ± 1° C, with 65–75% relative humidity (RH) and a 12:12L:D photoperiod.

Bioassay

A direct-contact mortality bioassay (World Health Organization 1981) was used to evaluate the toxicity of the 10 insecticides to late third instar Cx. tritaeniorhynchus from each of the six field-collected colonies. Each larvicide was dissolved in methanol, then further diluted in distilled water containing Triton X-100 (20 µl/L). A total of 25 larvae from each colony were placed in paper cups (350 mL) that contained each of the test larvicide solutions (250 mL). The toxicity of each test larvicide was determined using four to six concentrations ranging from 1 to 200 ppm. The control consisted of the methanol-Triton X-100 carrier solution in distilled water.

Treated and control larvae were held under the same conditions used for colony maintenance. Larvae were considered to be dead if they did not move when they were prodded with a fine wooden dowel 24 hrs post-treatment (Perumalsamy et al. 2009). All treatments were replicated three times using 25 larvae/replicate. Because all bioassays could not be conducted at the same time, treatments were blocked over time with a separate control treatment included for each block. Freshly prepared solutions were used for each block of bioassays (Robertson and Preisler 1992).

Data analysis

Concentration-mortality data were subjected to probit analysis (SAS Institute 2004). The LC50 values for each treatment were considered to be significantly different from one another when their 95% confidence limits failed to overlap. The susceptibility ratio (SR) was defined as the LC50 value of each field strain divided by the LC50 value of the field strain that demonstrated the highest susceptibility to the same insecticide. SR values of < 10, 10–40, 40–160, and > 160 were classified as low, moderate, high, and extremely high resistance, respectively (Kim et al. 2004).

Results and Discussion

The relative toxicities of 10 insecticides were assayed against third instars of the CC-CT strain and were compared using direct-contact mortality bioassay (Table 1). Based on 24 hr LC50 values, chlorpyrifos was the most toxic insecticide, followed by fenitrothion and fenthion. Etofenprox had the lowest toxicity. All insecticide showed low to moderate SR values for the CC-CT strain (SR = 1.0–16.5).

The toxicities of 10 test insecticides were assessed against third instars of the HS-CT strain (Table 2). Based on 24 hr LC50 values, the mosquito strain exhibited the highest susceptibility to chlorpyrifos, followed by chlorfenapyr and α-cypermethrin. The HS-CT strain demonstrated low to moderate levels of SR values to all tested insecticides (SR = 1.0– 14.5).

The toxicities of 10 insecticides were evaluated for the BS-CT strain (Table 3). Based on 24 hr LC50 values, the BS-CT strain was most susceptible to fenitrothion, followed by fenthion and α-cypermethrin. The larvae showed low to moderate SR values to all tested insecticides (SR = 1.0–15.5).

The SS-CT strain had the highest susceptibility to chlorpyrifos, followed by fenitrothion and chlorfenapyr. The mosquito strain demonstrated the lowest susceptibility to permethrin. The SS-CT strain demonstrated high to extremely high SR values to all tested insecticides (SR = 103.6–1, 053.4), except for etofenprox (SR = 29.3) (Table 4).

Table 1.

Summary of toxicities of 10 insecticides to third instars of the CC-CT strain of Culex tritaeniorhynchus based on the 24 hr exposure contact mortality bioassays.

t01_01.gif

Table 2.

Summary of toxicities of 10 insecticides to third instars of the HS-CT strain of Culex tritaeniorhynchus based on the 24 hr exposure contact mortality bioassays.

t02_01.gif

Table 3.

Summary of toxicities of 10 insecticides to third instars of the BS-CT strain of Culex tritaeniorhynchus based on the 24 hr exposure contact mortality bioassays.

t03_01.gif

The JJ-CT strain was highly susceptible to bifenthrin, followed by chlorfenapyr and fenthion. The susceptibility of the JJ-CT strain to permethrin was the lowest. The JJ-CT strain showed a low level of SR value to etofenprox (SR = 1.0), a high level of SR value to chlorfenapyr, fenitrothion, and fenthion (SR = 46.0–80.2), and an extremely high level of SR values (SR = 337.0–958.0) (Table 5).

The DG-CT strain was the most susceptible to chlorpyrifos, followed by chlorfenapyr and fenitrothion (Table 6). The DG-CT strain showed a low level SR value to chlorfenapyr (SR = 6.2), a moderate level SR value to etofenprox, chlorpyrifos, and fenitrothion (SR = 21.8–29.8), a high level SR value to fenthion (SR = 65.4), and an extremely high level of SR values to bifenthrin, β-cyfluthrin, deltamethrin, α-cypermethrin, and permethrin (SR = 236.2–838.2).

Because Cx. tritaeniorhynchus breeds mainly in paddy fields, it is under heavy selection pressure due to the agricultural applications of insecticides (Watanabe et al. 1990; Kamimura and Arakawa 1991; Shim et al. 1995a; Karunaratne and Hemingway 2000). The average insecticide susceptibilities of mosquito strains were compared between two different ecological conditions of habitat, namely rice paddy fields (agricultural areas, CC-CT, HS-CT, and BS-CT strains) and non rice paddy fields (non-agricultural areas, SS-CT, JJ-CT, and DG-CT strains) (Table 7). Three Cx. tritaeniorhynchus strains from agricultural areas had significantly lower susceptibility to all of the insecticides tested than mosquito strains from non-agricultural areas (average SR values = 28.5–686.3), except for the chemicals etofenprox, chlorfenapyr, and chlorpyrifos. Antonio-Nkondjio et al. (2011) showed that urban pollution had little effect on the devolpment of insecticide resistance in An. gambiae. The low SR value of etofenprox might have resulted from its low toxicity to mosquitoes. Of the 10 tested insecticides, etofenprox had the lowest toxicity for a susceptible strain of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, and it had a low SR value when relative levels of resistance of fieldcollected Cx. tritaeniorhynchus larvae during 2010 were compared to those of a colony established in 1992 from the same locality (Shin et al. 2011).

Table 4.

Summary of toxicities of 10 insecticides to third instars of the SS-CT strain of Culex tritaeniorhynchus based on the 24 hr exposure contact mortality bioassays.

t04_01.gif

Table 5.

Summary of toxicities of 10 insecticides to third instars of the JJ-CT strain of Culex tritaeniorhynchus based on the 24 hr exposure contact mortality bioassays.

t05_01.gif

Table 6.

Summary of toxicities of 10 insecticides to third instars of the DG-CT strain of Culex tritaeniorhynchus based on the 24 hr exposure contact mortality bioassays.

t06_01.gif

Table 7.

Comparisons of average susceptibilities of 10 insecticides to third instars of field-collected Culex tritaeniorhynchus between two different ecological conditions of habitat based on the 24 hr exposure contact mortality bioassays.

t07_01.gif

Pyrethroid insecticides have been employed frequently in the ROK due to their strong insecticidal activity and relatively lower human toxicity when compared to organophosphate insecticides (Chang et al. 2009). As a result of their increased usage, they demonstrated high to extremely high levels of SR values, while the less used organophosphates demonstrated low to moderate SR values. In the monitoring areas of this study, pyrethroid insecticides have been used for the control of agricultural pests for a long period, and this extended use may be why Cx. tritaeniorhynchus demonstrated high resistance to pyrethroids. According to the pest control operators in the area, mosquito control with permethrin failed some years (unpublished data.2011).

The mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes can be explained by metabolic detoxification (Liu et al. 2006). The metabolic enzymes involved include cytochrome P450s, glutathione transferases, and esterases or carboxylesterases, which hav effects on the detoxification and metabolism of compounds like the pyrethroids (Scott 1991; Feyereisen 1999; Scott 1999). The metabolic detoxification in the pyrethroid resistance of mosquitoes can be decreased using piperonyl butoxide , S,S,S-tributylphosphorotrithioate, and diethyl maleate, which are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, hydrolases, and glutathione S-transferases, respectively. The mosquitoes pretreated with piperonyl butoxide demonstrated a decreased P450 monooxygenase-mediated detoxification to two permethrin resistance strains of Culex quinquefasciatus (Xu et al. 2005). Xu (2005) also reported S, S, S-tributylphosphorotrithioate and diethyl maleate increased the toxicity of permethrin by the weakening of hydrolase-and glutathione S-transferases-mediated metabolic detoxification. However, the authors suggested that these metabolic enzymes did not completely abolish resistance to permethrin, because one or more additional resistance mechanisms involved in overall resistance were largely unaffected by these synergists (Liu et al. 2004). The pyrethroid resistance of Culex pipiens pipiens was almost completely suppressed using piperonyl butoxide, reducing cytochrome P450- and carboxylesterase-mediated detoxification in resistance (McAbee et al. 2004). Although further studies on mode of actions between the metabolic enzymes and the synergists are needed, an application of the piperonyl butoxide, S,S,S-tributylphosphorotrithioate, and diethyl maleate to the areas in this study might be very useful for the control of pyrethroid resistance Cx. tritaeniorhynchus.

Resistance monitoring is an effective component in a resistance management approach because it provides current information on the responses of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus populations to insecticides.

Susceptibility tests need to be conducted over a broad area, as insecticide pressures and usage may vary geographically. Insecticide failures in the ROK have occurred most likely as a result of the development of resistance (Shim et al. 1995a, b; Kim et al. 2007; Chang et al. 2009). Early detection of trends in the development of potential resistance can facilitate the use of synergists, the rotation of insecticides and/or classes of insecticides, or the use of alternate technologies that reduce the usage of chemical insecticides (Yilma et al. 1991; Lee et al. 1997). A better understanding of the mechanisms governing resistance development in Cx. tritaeniorhynchus will be extremely important for developing novel strategies to circumvent and/or delay resistance development, controlling resistant mosquitoes and, ultimately, reducing the prevalence of mosquito-borne diseases like JE in the ROK.

Figure 1.

Locations of larvae collections. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Vector Control and Surveillance work performed by the Korea National Institute of Health.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

BS-CT,

Busan

CC-CT,

Chuncheon

DG-CT,

Daegu

HS-CT,

Hwaseong

JE,

Japanese encephalitis

JJ-CT,

Jeonju

ROK,

Republic of Korea

SR,

susceptibility ratio

SS-CT,

Seosan

References

1.

C Antonio-Nkondjio , BT Fossog , C Ndo , BM Djantio , SZ Togouet , P Awono-Ambene , C Costantini , CS Wondji , H Ranson . 2011. Anopheles gambiae distribution and insecticide resistance in the cities of Douala and Yaoundé (Cameroon): Influence of urban agriculture and pollution. Malaria Journal 10: 154. Google Scholar

2.

DS Burke , CJ Leake . 1988. Japanese encephalitis. In: TP Monath , Editor. The arboviruses epidemiology and ecology. pp. 63–92. CRC.. Google Scholar

3.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/Korea). 2010. Public health weekly report. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online:  http://cdc.go.krGoogle Scholar

4.

KS Chang , JS Jung , C Park , DK Lee , EH Shin . 2009. Insecticide susceptibility and resistance of larvae of the Anopheles sinensis Group (Diptera: Culicidae) from Paju, Republic of Korea. Entomological Research 39: 196–200. Google Scholar

5.

TE Erlanger , S Weiss , J Keiser , J Utzinger , K Weidenmayer . 2009. Past, present, and future of Japanese encephalitis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 15: 1–7. Google Scholar

6.

R Feyereisen . 1999. Insect P450 enzyme. Annual Review of Entomology 44 : 507–533. Google Scholar

7.

K Kamimura , R Arakawa . 1991. Field evaluation of an insect growth regulator, pyriproxyfen, against the housefly, Musca domestica. Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology and Zoology 3: 1– 6. Google Scholar

8.

SH Karunaratne , J Hemingway . 2000. Insecticide resistance spectra and resistance mechanisms in populations of Japanese encephalitis vector mosquitoes, Culex tritaeniorhynchus and Culex gelidus, in Sri Lanka. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 14: 430–436. Google Scholar

9.

SA Khan , K Narain , R Handigue , P Dutta , J Mahanta , K Satyanarayana , VK Srivastava . 1996. Role of some environmental factors in modulating seasonal abundance of potential Japanese encephalitis vectors in Assam, India. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 27: 382–391. Google Scholar

10.

NJ Kim , KS Chang , WJ Lee , YJ Ahn . 2007. Monitoring of Insecticide Resistance in FieldCollected Populations of Culex pipiens pollens (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of AsiaPacific Entomology 10: 1–5. Google Scholar

11.

YJ Kim , HS Lee , SW Lee , YJ Ahn . 2004. Fenproximate resistnce in Tetramychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): crossresistacne and biochemical resistance mechanisms. Pest Management Science 60: 1001–1006. Google Scholar

12.

Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention (K-CDC). 2012. Disease Web Statistic System. Available online:  http://cdc.go.kr/kcdchome/jsp/observation/stat/rgt/STATRGT003List.isphttp://cdc.go.kr  Google Scholar

13.

DK Lee , EH Shin , JC Shim . 1997. Insecticide susceptibility of Culex pipiens pollens (Culicidae, Diptera) larvae in Seoul. Korean Journal of Entomology 27: 9–13. Google Scholar

14.

H Liu , EW Cupp , KM Micher , A Guo , N Liu . 2004. Insecticide resistance and crossresistance in Alabama and Florida strains of Culex quinquefasciatus (S.). Journal of Medical Entomology 41: 408–413. Google Scholar

15.

N Liu , Q Xu , F Zhu , L Zhang . 2006. Pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Science 13: 159–166. Google Scholar

16.

RD McAbee , KD Kang , MA Stanich , JA Christiansen , CE Wheelock , AD Inman , BD Hammock , AJ Cornel . 2004. Pyrethroid tolerance in Culex pipiens pipiens var molestus from Marin County, California. Pest Management Science 60: 359–368. Google Scholar

17.

H Perumalsamy , NJ Kim , YJ Ahn . 2009. Larvicidal activity of compounds isolated from Asarum heterotropoides against Culex pipiens pollens, Aedes aegypti, and Ochlerotatus togoi (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 46: 1420– 1423. Google Scholar

18.

JL Robertson , HK Preisler . 1992. Pesticide bioassays with arthropods. CRC. Google Scholar

19.

SAS Institute. 2004. SAS Online Doc, version 9.11. Statistical Analysis System Institute. Google Scholar

20.

JG Scott . 1991. Insecticide resistance in insects. In D Pimentel , Editor. Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture , pp. 663–667. CRC Press. Google Scholar

21.

JG Scott . 1999. Cytochromes P450 and insecticide resistance. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 29 : 757–777. Google Scholar

22.

JC Shim , HK Hong , DK Lee . 1995a. Susceptibilities of Culex tritaeniorhynchus larvae (Culicidae, Diptera) to insecticides. Korean Journal of Entomology 25: 13–20. Google Scholar

23.

JC Shim , HK Hong , DK Lee . 1995b. Susceptibilities of Anopheles sinensis larvae (Culicidae, Diptera) to various insecticides. Korean Journal of Entomology 25: 69–76. Google Scholar

24.

JC Shim , HI Ree , CL Kim . 1982. Study on the susceptibility of insecticide against Culex tritaeniorhynchus larvae. The Korean Journal of Entomology 12: 41–45. Google Scholar

25.

EH Shin , HK Kim , C Park , DK Lee , HS Kang , KS Chang . 2011. Insecticide susceptibility and resistance of Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera : Culicidae) larvae collected from Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Entomological Research 41 : 157–160. Google Scholar

26.

YM Sohn . 2000. Japanese encephalitis immunization in South Korea: past, present, and future. Emerging Infectious Disease 6: 17–24. Google Scholar

27.

T Solomon . 2006. Control of Japanese encephalitis-within our grasp? The New England Journal of Medicine 355: 869–871. Google Scholar

28.

DW Vaughn , CH Hoke . 1992. The epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis: prospects for prevention. Epidemiologic Reviews 14: 197–221. Google Scholar

29.

M Watanabe , R Arakawa , K Kamimura . 1990. Relationship between yearly change of captured numbers and insecticide resistance of Culex tritaeniorhynchus in Toyama Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Sanitary Zoology 41: 51–58. Google Scholar

30.

World Health Organization (WHO). 1981. Instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae to insecticides. WHO/VBC 81(807): 3–6. Google Scholar

31.

Q Xu , H Liu , L Zhang , N Liu . 2005. Mechanisms of permethrin resistance in mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus (S.). Pest Management Science 61: 1096–1102. Google Scholar

32.

M Yilma , TA Gwinn , DC Williams , MA Tid . 1991. Insecticide susceptibility of Aedes aegypti from Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 7: 69–72. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Dae-Hyun Yoo, E-Hyun Shin, Dong-Kyu Lee, Young Joon Ahn, Kyu-Sik Chang, Hyun-Kyung Kim, Seong-Yoon Kim, and Chan Park "Insecticide Susceptibility of Field-Collected Populations of Culex tritaeniorhynchus in the Republic of Korea," Journal of Insect Science 13(2), 1-10, (1 January 2013). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.013.0201
Received: 17 November 2011; Accepted: 1 March 2012; Published: 1 January 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top