How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2010 Methods to Reduce Avian Bycatch in Small Mammal Studies Using Snap Traps
Vanessa R. Lane, Karl V. Miller, Steven B. Castleberry, Darren A. Miller, T. Bently Wigley
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Avian bycatch, a common and undesired occurrence in small mammal studies, should be minimized by researchers. We examined effects of trap covering, treadle color (copper or yellow plastic), trap size (mouse or rat), and trap weathering (traps <1 yr or ≥1 yr old) on avian bycatch during 3 years. We found that covered traps caught 81% fewer birds and 70% fewer small mammals than did uncovered traps, that mouse traps caught 30% more birds and 38% more small mammals than did rat traps, and no capture differences for treadle color or trap weathering. Covered traps effectively reduced avian bycatch and should be used when reduced small-mammal capture rates are acceptable.

Vanessa R. Lane, Karl V. Miller, Steven B. Castleberry, Darren A. Miller, and T. Bently Wigley "Methods to Reduce Avian Bycatch in Small Mammal Studies Using Snap Traps," Journal of Wildlife Management 74(3), 595-599, (1 April 2010). https://doi.org/10.2193/2009-195
Published: 1 April 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
avian bycatch
Intensive forestry
nontarget captures
North Carolina
small mammals
snap traps
trapping
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top