Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2017 Distribution Pattern, Conservation Status, and Associated Flora of the Genus Juniperus in Subalpine Pastures of the Kashmir Himalayas
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Juniperus is an evergreen gymnosperm genus with a broad geographical distribution in the Northern Hemisphere. Juniperus constitutes important vegetation associations in the Himalayan highlands that have significant ecological and socioeconomic importance. This research investigated the distribution pattern, community structure, and ecosystem services provided byJuniperus -dominated subalpine vegetation in the upper Neelum Valley, Pakistan. Vegetation attributes and geographical characteristics were systematically recorded at 4 selected sites. Two species of Juniperus, Juniperus communis L. and J. excelsa M. Bieb., were found to have average importance values of 23.4 and 20.02%, respectively. J. excelsa showed an average basal area of 0.30 m2 ha−1 and an average stem density of 46.95 ha−1; J. communis had an average basal area of 0.25 m2 ha−1 and an average stem density of 33.21 ha−1. A total of 56 Juniperus-associated plant species from 29 families were recorded, with Asteraceae as the dominant family, followed by Lamiaceae, Polygonaceae, Rosaceae, Caryophyllaceae, and Apiaceae. Predominant associated species included Thymus linearis, Aster falconeri, Rosa webbiana, Berberis lyceum, Anagallis arvensis, Rumex nepalensis, Poa alpina, Bistorta affinis, and Iris hookeriana. The calculated average values were Shannon's diversity, 3.07; Simpson's diversity, 0.94; species richness, 1.11; species evenness, 0.90; and maturity index, 45.90. Hemicryptophytes were the dominant lifeform in the area (57.14%), and microphylls (46.42%) were the dominant leaf type. Overgrazing and fuelwood cutting were identified as serious threats to both Juniperus species. Restoration of the degraded juniper stands through collective efforts by government and local communities and regular monitoring is recommended.

Introduction

Juniperus is an evergreen gymnosperm genus with broad geographical distribution, occurring in the Arctic, Africa, East Africa, Central Asia, Central America, and South Asia, and it has significant ecological and socioeconomic importance in the Northern Hemisphere (Farjon 1992; Zangiabadi et al 2012; Tavankar 2015). Juniperus species constitute an important element of Himalayan highlands vegetation because of their ability to inhabit rocky slopes and poorly developed soils. Juniper stands are able to cope with severe temperatures, heavy snowfall, and strong grazing pressure because of their inherent longevity (Miller et al 2005). Juniperus species are distributed across the whole Himalayan region and occur at elevations ranging from 1500 to 4000 masl (Shah et al 2013; Ahmed et al 2015).

The Juniperus genus belongs to the Cupressaceae family, which has 67 species. Five Juniperus species are reported in Pakistan (Sarangzai et al 2013), and 4 are reported in India and Nepal (Mao et al 2010). Two species of Juniperus, Juniperus communis L. and J. excelsa M. Bieb., are reported to occur at high elevations in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Ahmed et al 2015). J. communis var. saxatilis Pallas, Fl. Ross., commonly known as alpine juniper, has a decumbent shrubby habit and grows on steep slopes between 3080 and 4000 masl. J. excelsa is a medium-sized tree growing in the upper ranges of dry temperate and lower subalpine zones between 2310 and 3700 masl (Dickoré and Nüsser 2000; Ali and Qaiser 1993–2007). The J. excelsa forests in Baluchistan Province, Pakistan, contain some of the world's oldest (2400 years) and slowest-growing trees and are known as living fossil forests; they are now part of a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization World Heritage site (Sheikh 1985; Sarangzai et al 2012).

Juniperus species play a vital role in maintaining ecological services in the fragile Himalayan highland, including soil fertility, erosion control, humus and biomass production, air purification, and microclimate regulation (García et al 2000; Rawat and Everson 2012). Juniper stands also provide ecosystem services to the local Himalayan communities, including wood for fuel and construction, shelter, ethnomedicinal products, and recreational and ecotourism value (Gonny et al 2006; Ozkan et al 2010; Nüsser and Schmidt 2017). Juniperus contributes significantly to the livelihoods of poor and remote mountain populations, who face harsh climatic conditions and lack alternative fuel and energy resources.

The distribution pattern and regeneration status of Juniperus in the Himalayan highlands is adversely affected by an increasing human population, fuelwood overextraction, overgrazing, drought, and climate change (Bhattarai et al 2006; Achakzai et al 2013; Gruwez et al 2013). The rapid decline of the species indicates an urgent need for serious conservation efforts at the regional level in the Himalayas (IUCN 2015). Himalayan alpines have received relatively lesser attention compared to the European Alps or North American tundra biomes, indicating a considerable knowledge gap regarding vegetation structure and species conservation status (Nüsser and Dickoré 2002). In light of the ecological and socioeconomic significance of the genus Juniperus, the current study was designed to investigate the distribution pattern of Juniperus species in the Himalayan highlands of Kashmir and to further analyze the community structure and vegetation attributes of Juniperus-dominated communities. Objectives also included an assessment of the intensity of anthropogenic pressure on Juniperus stands and associated flora.

Material and methods

The study area lies in Shoonthar Valley, which is located in the Pir Panjal subrange of the western Himalayas in the Neelum district of Pakistan. This region is administered by Kashmir and ranges from 3000 to 4000 masl at 74°31′E and 34°59′N (Figure 1). The valley is surrounded by high glaciated peaks and steep slopes colonized by Juniperus stands. The climate is subalpine to alpine and characterized by extreme cold during winter, with heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures down to −10°C from November to April. Summers are short and cool: the average temperature between June and August is around 10°C. The area receives about 1000 mm of precipitation annually, most of which falls as snow in winter (Dar and Malik 2009; Pak-Met 2015).

FIGURE 1 

Location of the study area and study sites in the western Himalayas. (Source: Google Maps, Image Landsat Copernicus)

i0276-4741-37-4-487-f01.tif

Field expeditions were conducted from July to August 2015 at 4 selected sites in Shoonthar Valley (Table 1). Vegetation data were recorded systematically for all sites following standard phytosociological protocols (Panthi et al 2007). Fifteen 5 × 5 m quadrats were laid at each site, and vegetation density, frequency, and cover were recorded. Primary vegetation data were processed to determine analytical and synthetic phytosociological attributes, including the importance values for Juniperus. Indices of diversity were calculated after Simpson (1948) and Shannon and Wiener (1949), and indices of maturity and similarity were calculated after Pichi-Sermolli (1948) and Sørensen (1948), respectively. Species evenness was calculated after Pielou (1975), and species richness was calculated after Menhinick (1964). The physiognomic attributes of the local vegetation, including lifeform and leaf spectra classification, were determined following Raunkier (1956). The geographical coordinates of each site were recorded using the global positioning system. Regeneration and basal area cover were estimated by recording stem and seedling densities at each site. The anthropogenic pressure on Juniperus stands was recorded in terms of fuelwood cuttings and overgrazing (visual indicators included cuttings, browsed vegetation, hoof marks, and dung). Data were statistically analyzed by applying multivariate ordination techniques, including cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) (Jongman et al 1995).

TABLE 1 

Geographical characteristics of the investigated Juniperus-dominated sites.

i0276-4741-37-4-487-t01.tif

Results

Results revealed that the subalpine vegetation of the investigated sites was dominated by 2 species of Juniperus, J. communis L. and J. excelsa M. Bieb., with importance values of 23.42 and 20.01%, respectively. J. communis was present at all study sites and had a total average basal area of 0.25 m2 ha−1 and a total average stem density of 33.21 ha−1. Maximum growth of J. communis was recorded at site 1, where it had a basal area of 0.47 m2 ha−1 and a stem density of 54.35 ha−1. J. excelsa was present at 3 of the 4 study sites and had a total average basal area of 0.30 m2 ha−1 and a total average stem density of 46.95 ha−1. The highest basal area (0.69 m2 ha−1) and stem density (91.70 ha−1) were recorded for J. excelsa at site 3 (Table 2).

TABLE 2 

Structural attributes of Juniperus-dominated stands recorded in the study area.

i0276-4741-37-4-487-t02.tif

An analysis of the floristic composition of Juniperus-associated species showed 56 species belonging to 29 families. Asteraceae (16%) was the most dominant family, followed by Lamiaceae (9%), Polygonaceae (9%), Rosaceae (7%), Caryophyllaceae (5.3%), and Apiaceae (5.3%). Hemicryptophytes were found to be the dominant lifeforms (57.14% of the recorded species), followed by geophytes (17.85%). Microphylls were the dominant leaf spectra (46.42%), followed by leptophylls (17.85%) (Supplemental material, Table S1:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00119.S1).

Phytosociological investigations revealed 4 communities. The main community was subalpine tangle wood composed of dwarf scrubland and steppe formations. The recorded plant communities showed an average species number of 30.5, with an average Simpson's diversity value of 0.94 and Shannon's diversity value of 3.07. The determined species richness value was 1.1, species evenness was 0.90, and the maturity index was found to be 45.90 (Table 3).

TABLE 3 

Phytosociological parameters recorded in the investigated area.

i0276-4741-37-4-487-t03.tif

The J. communis–Rosa–Allium community, consisting of 33 species, was located at elevations of 3450 m. J. communis was the dominant species, followed by Rosa webbiana, Allium wallichii, Thymus linearis, and Artemisia abrotanum.

The Aster–J. excelsa–J. communis community, consisting of 40 species, was recorded at an elevation of 3700 m. Aster falconeri was the dominant species, followed by J. excelsa, J. communis, Berberis lyceum, and T. linearis.

The Thymus–J. excelsa–Rosa community, consisting of 30 species, was recorded at an elevation of 3350 m and was dominated by T. linearis, followed by J. excelsa, R. webbiana, Verbascum thapsus, and J. communis.

The Rumex–J. excelsa–Anagallis community, consisting of 19 species, was recorded at an elevation of 3600 m dominated by Rumex nepalensis, J. excelsa, Anagallis arvensis, Poa alpine, and Silene vulgaris (Table S1).

The cluster analysis identified 3 significant correlations in the species data matrix. Elevation, degree of slope steepness, and soil moisture appeared as key factors governing the species assemblages. The largest cluster formed at the x-axis and was composed of 24 species dominated by J. communis, R. webbiana, Rhodiola, Pedicularis, Sibbaldia, Aster, Astragallus, Habeneria, and Artemesia. These species were found in abundance at sites 1 and 2 on steep, dry, and rocky northeast- and northwest-facing slopes (>60°). The second cluster represents species mostly recorded at site 4, which is characterized by a moderate southeast-facing slope and relatively higher soil moisture. Composed of 15 species, this cluster is dominated by J. excelsa, Rumex, Bistorta, Berberis, Poa, Silene, Fragaria, and Taraxacum. The third group, composed of 17 species, was dominated by Angelica, Lindelofia, Rheum, Viola, Polygonum, and Betula. This cluster included species from lower elevations and south-facing slopes with better light exposure at site 4 (Figure 2). The PCA verified the species–site correlations identified by cluster analysis. Aster, J. communis, J. excelsa, Rosa, Rumex, and Iris showed strong associations with sites 1 and 2, whereas Aconitum, Thymus, Silene, and Anagallis correlated with sites 3 and 4. Species occurring at all sites were clustered in the middle of the PCA in an overlapping manner (Figure 3).

FIGURE 2 

Cluster analysis dendrogram of species data based on Ward's method.

i0276-4741-37-4-487-f02.tif

FIGURE 3 

PCA biplot of species and site data.

i0276-4741-37-4-487-f03.tif

Overgrazing and fuelwood cutting were identified as the major threats to Juniperus in the study area. J. communis stands exhibited stunted growth and browsed canopy, whereas J. excelsa stands showed evidence of cutting for fuelwood and construction. No regeneration was recorded for either species at any of the sites.

Discussion

The current study presents the results of the first investigation focusing on the distribution, structure, and composition of Juniperus-dominated vegetation stands in the Himalayan highlands of Kashmir. In this area, Juniperus occurs in marginal populations on rugged, rocky slopes and shows no evidence of regeneration because of strong suppression due to overgrazing and overextraction for fuelwood, as well as harsh climatic conditions (Nüsser 2000).

An average Simpson's Diversity Index of 0.94 was recorded in the investigated area, which is lower than the values recorded across the region: 1.53–2.88 in the Western Himalayas (Samant et al 1998), 2.5–3.10 in the Trans-Himalayan region of Nepal (Panthi et al 2007), and 0.91 in Western Himalayan alpine pastures (Shaheen et al 2011). The lower values of diversity and species richness may be attributed to severe anthropogenic pressure and environmental stress (García et al 1998; Körner 2007). Communities were characterized by a high degree of evenness, ie 0.90, which correlates with the low species counts per site as a result of disturbance (Saxena and Singh 1982; Fosaa 2004). The impacts of natural and anthropogenic disturbances were further reflected in the low maturity indices (>60) in 3 of the 4 studied communities. The fourth site, with a maturity index of 60.52, barely qualified as mature (Table 3). Biological spectra analysis showed that local flora was dominated by hemicryptophytic microphyllous vegetation. This particular physiognomy reflects adaptation to the harsh climates of the Himalayan highlands and is supported by the findings of Klimeš and Dickoré (2005) in Ladakh as well as in Malik et al (2007) in the Kashmir Himalayas.

J. communis showed higher abundances and importance values than J. excelsa throughout the study area. This is in accordance with the broader geographical distribution of J. communis across the Northern Hemisphere because of its inherent longevity and ability to tolerate harsh environmental conditions (Adams 1999; Pirani et al 2011). Soil moisture and slope appeared to be the major microclimatic factors affecting the growth and abundance of J. excelsa. In the study area, J. excelsa was found to grow best at site 3, which is characterized by higher moisture content and gentler slopes (Table 2). Low slope is reported to facilitate the growth of seedlings, resulting in better recruitment at the local scale (Tavankar 2015).

Juniperus-dominated communities were found to be declining because of an overextraction of wood for fuel and construction purposes (Rawat et al 2009). Overgrazing was recorded as a serious threat, especially because this genus has limited ability to recover from the effects of grazing, which reduces sprouting and seed survival (Jiménez et al 2003). Most importantly, no evidence of regeneration was found in the study area. Seedling recruitment is hindered by the lack of shade and moisture on steep, sunny, and rocky slopes and compounded by persistent grazing pressure (Couralet et al 2005; Iszkuło and Boratyński 2011). Upward migration of some temperate shrubs (eg Rosa, Cotoneaster, and Berberis species) also contributes to the reduction of natural Juniperus habitat because of increased competition (Yadav et al 2006).

In conclusion, Juniperus stands in the area are declining because of anthropogenic disturbances and climatic harshness. It is critical to conserve these naturally occurring Juniperus stands, which contribute significantly to the ecological and socioeconomic health of the Himalayan highlands. Pressure on Juniperus stands can be reduced by providing local communities with fuel alternatives and efficient building materials—including thermostat sheathing, plywood, foam insulation, and recycled steel—as well as by controlling overgrazing and fuelwood extraction. It is recommended that this diverse and unique vegetation type should be restored through collective efforts involving the government and local communities. This could include establishment of protected areas, afforestation schemes, training and capacity building of departmental personnel and local communities, and regular monitoring.

REFERENCES

  1. Achakzai AKK, Batool H, Aqeel T, Bazai ZA. 2013. A comparative study of the deforestation and regeneration status of Ziarat Juniper forest. Pakistan Journal of Botany 45(4):1169–1172. Google Scholar

  2. Adams RP. 1999. Systematics of multi-seeded eastern hemisphere Juniperus based on leaf essential oils and RAPD DNA fingerprinting. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 27:709–725. Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed M, Saaddiqui MF, Ahmed A, Sarangzai AM, Abbas T, Hussain MI. 2015. Present state and multivariate analysis of a few juniper forests of Baluchistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47(1):135–140. Google Scholar

  4. Ali SI, Qaiser M, editors.1993–2007. Flora of Pakistan. No. 191–215. Islamabad, Karachi, Pakistan: [no publisher]. Google Scholar

  5. Bhattarai S, Chaudhary RP, Taylor RSL. 2006. Ethnobotany of wild junipers (Juniperus species) in Manang district, central Nepal. Scientific World 4(4):109–112. Google Scholar

  6. Couralet C, Sass-Klaassen U, Sterck F, Bekele T, Zuidema PA. 2005. Combining dendrochronology and matrix modeling in demographic studies: An evaluation for Juniperus procera in Ethiopia. Forest Ecology Management 216:317–330. Google Scholar

  7. Dar MEUI, Malik ZH. 2009. A floristic list and phenology of plant species of Lawat Area District Neelum, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. International Journal of Botany 5(2):194–199. Google Scholar

  8. Dickoré WB, Nüsser M. 2000. Flora of Nanga Parbat (NW Himalaya, Pakistan). An Annotated Inventory of Vascular Plants with Remarks on Vegetation Dynamics. Englera 19.Berlin, Germany: Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin Dahlem. Google Scholar

  9. Farjon A. 1992. The taxonomy of multiseed junipers (Juniperus sect. sabina) in Southwest Asia and East Africa (taxonomic notes on Cupressaceae I). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 49:251–283. Google Scholar

  10. Fosaa AM. 2004. Biodiversity patterns of vascular plant species in mountain vegetation in the Faroe Islands. Diversity and Distributions 10(3):217–223. Google Scholar

  11. García D, Zamora R, Gomez JM, Jordano P, Hodar JA. 2000. Geographical variation in seed production, predation and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe. Journal of Ecology 88(3):435–446. Google Scholar

  12. García D, Zamora R, Hódar LA, Gómez JM. 1998. Age structure of Juniperus communis L. in the Iberian Peninsula: Conservation of remnant populations in Mediterranean mountain. Biological Conservation 87:215–220. Google Scholar

  13. Gonny M, Cavaleiro C, Salgueiro L, Casanova J. 2006. Analysis of Juniperus communis subsp. alpina needle, berry, wood and root oils by combination of GC, GC/MS and 13C-NMR. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 21(1):99–106. Google Scholar

  14. Gruwez R, Leroux O, De Frenne P, Tack W, Viane R, Verheyen K. 2013. Critical phases in the seed development of common juniper (Juniperus communis). Plant Biology 15(1):210–219. Google Scholar

  15. Iszkuło G, Boratyński A. 2011. Initial period of sexual maturity determines the greater growth rate of male over female in the dioecious tree Juniperus communis subsp. communis. Acta oecologica 37(2):99–102. Google Scholar

  16. IUCN [International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources]. 2015. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2015-4).  http://www.iucnredlist.org; accessed on 30 May 2016. Google Scholar

  17. Jiménez JF, Werner O, Sánchez-Gómez P, Fernández S, Guerra J. 2003. Genetic variations and migration pathway of Juniperus thurifera L. (Cupressaceae) in the western Mediterranean region. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 51:11–22. Google Scholar

  18. Jongman RH, TerBraak CJ, Van Tongeren OFR, editors.1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

  19. Klimeš L, Dickoré B. 2005. A contribution to the vascular plant flora of Lower Ladakh (Jammu & Kashmir, India). Willdenowia 35:125–153. Google Scholar

  20. Körner C. 2007. The use of “altitude” in ecological research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22(11):569–574. Google Scholar

  21. Malik ZH, Hussain F, Malik NZ. 2007. Life form and leaf size spectra of plant communities harbouring Ganga Chotti and Bedori Hills during 1999–2000. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 9(6):833–838. Google Scholar

  22. Mao K, Hao G, Liu J, Adams RP, Milne RI. 2010. Diversification and biogeography of Juniperus (Cupressaceae): Variable diversification rates and multiple intercontinental dispersals. New Phytologist 188(1):254–272. Google Scholar

  23. Menhinick EF. 1964. A comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology 45:859–861. Google Scholar

  24. Miller RF, Bates JD, Svejcar TJ, Pierson FB, Eddleman LE. 2005. Biology, Ecology and Management of Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis). Technical Bulletin 152. Corvallis, OR: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University. Google Scholar

  25. Nüsser M. 2000. Change and persistence: Contemporary landscape transformation in the Nanga Parbat region, northern Pakistan. Mountain Research and Development 20(4):348–355. Google Scholar

  26. Nüsser M, Dickoré WB. 2002. A tangle in the triangle: Vegetation map of the Eastern Hindukush (Chitral, Northern Pakistan). Erdkunde 56(1):37–59. Google Scholar

  27. Nüsser M, Schmidt S. 2017. Nanga Parbat revisited: Evolution and dynamics of sociohydrological interactions in the Northwestern Himalaya. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(2):403–415. Google Scholar

  28. Ozkan K, Gulsoy S, Aerts R, Muys B. 2010. Site properties for Crimean juniper (Juniperus excelsa) in semi-natural forests of south western Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology 31(1):97. Google Scholar

  29. Pak-Met [Pakistan Meteorological Department]. 2015. The Normals of Climatic Data of Azad Jammu & Kashmir. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Meteorological Department. Google Scholar

  30. Panthi MP, Chaudhary RP, Vetaas OR. 2007. Plant species richness and composition in a trans-Himalayan inner valley of Manang district, central Nepal. Himalayan Journal of Sciences 4(6):57–64. Google Scholar

  31. Pichi-Sermolli RE. 1948. An index for establishing the degree of maturity in plant communities. Journal of Ecology 36(1):85–90. Google Scholar

  32. Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological Diversity. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar

  33. Pirani A, Moazzeni H, Mirinejad S, Naghibi F, Mosaddegh M. 2011. Ethnobotany of Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. (Cupressaceae) in Iran. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 9:335–341. Google Scholar

  34. Raunkier C. 1956. The Life Form of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon. Google Scholar

  35. Rawat YS, Everson CS. 2012. Ecological status and uses of Juniper species in the cold desert environment of the Lahaul Valley, North-western Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 9:676–686. Google Scholar

  36. Rawat YS, Vishvakarma SCR, Todaria NP. 2009. Fuel wood consumption pattern of tribal communities in cold desert of the Lahaul valley, North-Western Himalaya, India. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(11):1547–1557. Google Scholar

  37. Samant SS, Dhar U, Rawal RS. 1998. Biodiversity status of a protected area in West Himalaya: Askot Wildlife Sanctuary. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 5:194–203. Google Scholar

  38. Sarangzai AM, Ahmed A, Siddiqui MF, Laghari SK, Akber M, Hussain A. 2013. Ecological status and regeneration patterns of Juniperus excelsa in north-eastern Balochista. FUUAST Journal of Biology 3(2):53–61. Google Scholar

  39. Sarangzai AM, Ahmed M, Ahmed A, Tareen L, Jan SU. 2012. The ecology and dynamics of J. excelsa forest in Balochistan-Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44(5):1617–1625. Google Scholar

  40. Saxena AK, Singh JS. 1982. A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetatio 50:3–22. Google Scholar

  41. Shah SM, Hussain F, Khan M. 2013. Growth behaviour, sex ratio and fruit output of Juniperus excelsa in Mastuj valley, District Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB) 3(2):146–151. Google Scholar

  42. Shaheen H, Khan SM, Harper DM, Ullah Z, Qureshi RA. 2011. Species diversity, community structure, and distribution patterns in Western Himalayan Alpine Pastures of Kashmir, Pakistan. Mountain Research and Development 31(2):153–159. Google Scholar

  43. Shannon CE, Wiener W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar

  44. Sheikh IS. 1985. Afforestation in Juniper Forests of Balouchistan. Peshawar, Pakistan: Pakistan Forest Institute. Google Scholar

  45. Simpson H. 1948. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688. Google Scholar

  46. Sørensen TJ. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Biologiske Skrifter 5(4):1–34. Google Scholar

  47. Tavankar F. 2015. Structure of natural Juniperus excelsa stands in northwest of Iran, Biodiversitas 16(2):161–167. Google Scholar

  48. Yadav RR, Singh J, Dubey B, Misra KG. 2006. A 1584-year ring width chronology of juniper from Lahul, Himachal Pradesh: Prospects of developing millennia-long climate records. Current Science 90(8):1122–1126. Google Scholar

  49. Zangiabadi S, Naseri F, Ahmadimoghadam A. 2012. Investigation on silvicultural properties and soil characteristics of Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb in the Southeast of Iran. American–Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 12(3):269–274. Google Scholar

Appendices

Supplemental material

TABLE S1 Floristic composition, physiognomic attributes, and importance values of Juniperus-dominated flora.

Found at DOI:  10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00119.S1 (74 KB PDF).

© 2017 Shaheen et al. This open access article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please credit the authors and the full source.
Hamayun Shaheen, Shahzad Naseer Awan, and Shamshad Aziz "Distribution Pattern, Conservation Status, and Associated Flora of the Genus Juniperus in Subalpine Pastures of the Kashmir Himalayas," Mountain Research and Development 37(4), (1 November 2017). https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00119.1
Received: 1 March 2017; Accepted: 1 September 2017; Published: 1 November 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top