Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2008 Habitat Characterization and Population Density of Brown Spider Monkeys (Ateles hybridus) in Magdalena Valley, Colombia
Author Affiliations +

Introduction

The spider monkey Ateles hybridus, one of the most threatened primate species in the Neotropics is restricted to Colombia and Venezuela (Defler, 2004). There are two sub-species present in Colombia: A. hybridus hybridus and A. hybridus brunneus (Froehlich et al., 1991 in Defler, 2004). The geographical range of the species includes the northwest region of the country, along the Magdalena River from the southern region of La Guajira to the northeast of the department of Boyacá (Defler, 2004). Populations of Ateles hybridus still exist in several Colombian departments (Magdalena, Cesár, Norte de Santander, Arauca, Santander, Bolívar, Antioquia and Caldas). Due to its limited distribution range, high hunting pressure, low birth rates and the accelerated transformation of its habitat, the species is now considered Critically Endangered (CRA3cd) and faces the highest risk of extinction in Colombia (Pinzón, 1998; IUCN, 2008; Defler and Rodriguez, 2003). Few conservation actions have focused on A. hybridus subspecies. In the 1970's, there was an initiative to create a protected area at the Serranía San Lucas, where A. hybridus brunneus occurs, but the plan has not been realized (Defler, 2004).

Studies and conservation programs for Ateles hybridus in Colombia are scarce (Defler, 2004). There are two published studies that include general ecological information on the populations in the state of Bolivar (Bernstein et al., 1976; Green, 1978). Additionally, there are reports of the species from Venezuela (Mondolfi and Eisenberg, 1979 in Defler, 2004). However, there is much less information available for A. hybridus than for other spider monkey species (Defler, 2004). The main aims of the present study were to estimate the population density of brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus hybridus) at El Paujil Bird Reserve, Magdalena Valley (Colombia) and to compare the abundance of the monkeys across forests with different characteristics in the area. According to Stevenson (2001) the abundance of primate communities inside protected Neotropical forests is positively related to fruit production. For this reason we predicted higher population densities for forests with abundant fruit production. In addition, we examined the effect of different levels of logging and hunting pressure, which are known to impact the population density of large Neotropical primates (Peres and Palacios, 2007). Other projects within the study zone are being developed, focusing on the behavioral and ecological aspects of the species (A. Link pers. comm.), as well as conservation actions and educational campaigns.

Methods

The research was focused on the A. hybridus hybridus populations existing at El Paujil Bird Reserve (owned by Fundación ProAves) located at the Serranía de Las Quinchas in Santander and Boyacá departments (74° 11′ W, 5° 56′ N: 200 – 1700 m a.s.l.). The nearest weather station is located in the municipality of Otanche (74° 11′ W, 5° 40′ N: 1070 m a.s.l.), where the median temperature is 27.8°C Precipitation is bimodal showing peaks in April–May and September–November; the total annual precipitation is 2,070 mm. Relative humidity ranges from 85% to 89% (Balcázar-Vargas et al., 2000). Annual rainfall during 2007 was 3,285 mm (A. Link, pers. comm.)

Forest characterization

Four different forest types were studied: forest with a moderate level of selective logging (logged forest), forest on flood plains, young secondary forest (secondary forest), and forest with less logging pressure (undisturbed forest). Three of these forest types were present inside the reserve: logged forest, forest on flood plains, and secondary forest. Undisturbed forest was not found inside the reserve, but was studied on the property of Mr. Norberto Vargas, 8 km away from the reserve. The logged forest had been exploited for wood in the past, contrary to the undisturbed forest, which had been logged for fewer species and to a lesser extent. The flood plains were not very extensive, existing only at the bank of the Ermitaño River (< 50 m wide), and flooding occurred only for a few days during the rainy seasons; for this reason we did not establish vegetation plots in this forest type. To determine forest composition, we completed five 1-ha vegetation plots, taking into account the proportional area of each forest type found. In every hectare we marked and identified all trees and lianas with DBH (Diameter at Breast Height) greater or equal to 5 cm, following the methodology used in Stevenson et al. (2004). The identification of each plant was made with the aid of binoculars. In the cases where identification was not possible, we collected botanical samples for later identification. The vouchers were placed at the Universidad de Los Andes Herbarium (ANDES) and the National Herbarium (COL). For each 1-ha plot we calculated species richness, number of species per stem and the Fisher's diversity index.

Resource availability

Following the methodology proposed by Stevenson (2004), we carried out biweekly phenological transects to estimate fruit production of endozoochorous species. Transects were placed according to the proportion of each forest type inside the reserve. The distances covered for each forest type were: 8.9 km for logged forests, 1 km for secondary forests and 0.8 km for flood plains. We estimated the crop as the total number of fruits produced by each tree present along the transects. To decrease the variance resulting from visual estimates made by different observers, we quantified fruit crop as the mean value of log-scale categories (i.e. 1–10, 10–100, 100–1000, and so on: Janson and Chapman, 1999). To obtain the production in terms of biomass for each individual, we estimated the average weight of each species, drying and weighing a minimum of 5 fruits. The total production was estimated as the total production of all individuals in an area determined from the length and effective width of the transects, which depends on the size of the trees (Stevenson, 2004). The undisturbed forest was not included because is located far from El Paujil Bird Reserve. However, in order to make comparisons within forests, we calculated the basal area of the endozoochorous species for all plots, using only individuals with DBH greater than 10 cm. In general, the basal area of fruiting trees is positively correlated with fruit production (Chapman et al., 1994; Stevenson et al., 1998).

Population density of Ateles hybridus and other primates

We used linear transects to estimate the population density of all diurnal primates in each forest type. We collected information once a month, recording the species, number of individuals, and perpendicular distance to the transect. The length of the transects was 6.0 km for the undisturbed forest, 9.9 km for the logged forest, 2.1 km for the flood plains and 1.1 km for the secondary forest. Data were analyzed for each species using the King estimator (Leopold 1933):

e01_46.gif
Where n is the number of individuals observed on each transect, L is the length of the transect, and a is the average perpendicular distance of the individuals to the trail. To determine differences in A. hybridus density between forests we performed a Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test using Statistix 8.0.

Results

Forest type characterization

The diversity indexes calculated for each vegetation plot are shown in Table 1. We observed that the diversity indexes calculated for undisturbed forest were very similar to indexes calculated for the logged forest, while the diversity indexes for the secondary forest were notably lower than for the other forests.

Table 1.

Diversity indices and basal area of endozoochorous plant species from each 1-ha vegetation plot in 3 different forest types at the study area (values in parenthesis correspond to plants > or = 10 cm DBH).

Resource availability

We found relatively low production for the flood plains (38 kg/ha ± 2.3SD) and secondary forest (286 kg/ha ± 12.3 SD), while the logged forests showed higher production (501 kg/ha ± 9.4SD). The production in the flood plains was relatively constant through the sampling period, showing variation between the biweekly periods every month (Fig. 1a). Fruit production in the secondary forest showed a peak in April caused by the fructification of a single individual of Inga alba, a non-characteristic species of this forest type (Fig. 1b). For the logged forest, production showed a fructification peak during April–June, which matches with the first rainy season at the study site (Fig. 1c). We found significant differences of resource availability among forest types according to the disturbance level. The comparison based on the basal area of endozoochorous species (Table 1) suggests that fruit productivity should be higher in the undisturbed forest than in the logged forest, because it holds a higher basal area of endozoochorous species.

Population density of Ateles hybridus and other primates

We did not observe Ateles hybridus in secondary forest or in flood plains during the study (Table 2). In contrast, we found a high density of spider monkeys in the undisturbed and logged forests. Density was similar between these two types of forests (n= 24, F= 0.08, p= 0.77). A similar situation was found for Alouatta seniculus; the highest density of howlers were in the logged forest, and they were also present in the undisturbed forest, but not in the other forests. On the other hand, the highest density of Cebus albifrons was in the secondary forest, where there no other primate species were observed.

Discussion

We found differences among forest types in diversity, fruit production and basal area of endozoochorous species, which are associated with structural and floristic composition (Aldana et al. in prep.). According to our predictions, the forest types with high fruit production showed the highest population densities of Ateles hybridus. How- ever, there was little difference between density estimates in the logged and undisturbed forest. This unexpected result may be caused by several factors. It is possible that natural resources exploitation, in particular hunting pressure, could have had a high impact. The logged forest is located inside El Paujil reserve and currently provides protection to the primates and their habitat. In contrast, the undisturbed forest is outside the reserve, where human activities are not controlled and, besides the difficulty to access the area, there is no particular protection for the primates. Occasionally, during our fieldwork, we detected hunting sites in the undisturbed forest; hunting may reduce the population density, as well as the probability of detection and the foraging preference in the zone. Another possible explanation is that the logged forest is fragmented, with reduced forest area available, so the high density in the reserve may be explained by the effect of population concentration. Although it is difficult for these primates to move between fragments, there are some observations of individuals crossing between two fragments using the highest trees above roads (A. Link, pers. comm.). Furthermore, the group found on this fragment has approximately 24 individuals with 4 females carrying infants (A. Link, pers. com.); this indicates that the population contains a high proportion of young individuals, characteristic of growing populations, and suggests that the conditions in which these primates are found are adequate to sustain the population over the short term. In a preliminary evaluation of the Ateles hybridus diet at El Paujil, Diaz-Cubillos (2007) found that the group uses the fragment of logged forest, preferring areas with high canopy and high plant diversity. This explains why we did not find these primates inside the secondary forest or the flood plains, since these areas have lower canopy and are not very productive or diverse.

Figure 1.

Monthly production (kg/ha) of endozoochorous fruits within different forest types found at El Paujil Bird Reserve, for the period of time sampled: February 2006 – January 2007. a) Production in the secondary forest, b) Production in the flood plains, c) Production in the logged forest.

f01_46.eps

Table 2.

Density of A. hybridus and other diurnal primate species in different forest types at El Paujil Bird Reserve and nearby forests, n/a = non/applicable in the cases where the observations were zero for all months and the standard deviation could not be calculated.

Conclusions and recommendations

Even though the undisturbed forest offers a higher quantity and diversity of endozoochorous plant species, the Ateles hybridus groups of the study area at the Serranía de Las Quinchas have similarly high population densities in undisturbed forests and logged forests, because the later are protected from hunting activities. In areas with past total deforestation, such as the secondary forests, we did not find A. hybridus groups. This suggests that, in contrast to selective logging, clear-cutting forests has long term negative consequences for this species. This study indicates that logged forest fragments in El Paujil Bird Reserve are still in adequate condition to carry healthy populations of primate species such as A. hybridus, A. seniculus, and C. albifrons. Accordingly, the results of this study suggest that a population of A. hybridus requires relative mature forest with high canopy levels. We recommend the expansion of the protected areas where the species can still be found in order to decrease fragmentation, increase connectivity within fragments, and assure a minimum area where the A. hybridus populations could have enough space to sustain healthy populations. We also recommend continued improvement and implementation of educational activities with children, and the development of activities with adults to raise awareness at all levels in the local communities. Aims should include the reduction of hunting activities outside of protected areas to guarantee the conservation of the species in the region.

Acknowledgments

This research was possible thanks to the grants from Primate Conservation Inc. and Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation, the financial and logistical support from Woolly Monkey Foundation, Universidad de Los Andes, Fundación ProAves Colombia, and Fundación Shambala. We would like to thank Brent White for all his support and Tomas Defler for his interest in the conservation of Ateles hybridus and helpful comments on the project proposal. Special thanks to Elkin Luis Rodriguez for the data on census from the undisturbed forests and Oscar Baena for his help in gathering some phenological data at El Paujil.

References

1 

M. P. Balcázar-Vargas , O. J. Rangel-Churio and E. L. Linares-C 2000. Diversidad florística de la Serranía de Las Quinchas, Magdalena Medio, Colombia. Caldasia 22(2): 191–224.

2 

I. S. Berstein , P. Balcaen , L. Dresdale , H. Gouzoules , M. Kavanagh , T. Patterson and P. Newman-Warner 1976. Differential effects of forest degradation on primate populations. Primates 17: 401–411.

3 

C. A. Chapman , R. Wrangham and L. J. Chapman 1994. Indexes of habitat-wide fruit abundance in tropical forests. Biotropica 26: 160–171.

4 

T. R. Defler 2004. Primates of Colombia. Conservation International Tropical Field Guide Series. Bogotá: Conservación Internacional.

5 

T. R. Defler and J. V. Rodríguez 2003. Ateles hybridus ssp. hybridus. In: 2003 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

6 

L. D. Díaz Cubillos 2007. Caracterización de la dieta de un grupo de choibos Ateles hybridus hybridus (Atelidaeprimate) y evaluación de la diversidad florística de un fragmento de bosque en la Serranía de las Quinchas (Boyacá - Colombia). Undergraduate Thesis. Universidad del Tolima, Ibagué, Colombia.

7 

K. M. Green 1978. Primate censusing in northern Colombia: A comparison of two techniques. Primates 19: 537–550.

8 

IUCN, 2008. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/39961.

9 

CH. Janson , and C. A. Chapman 1999. Resources as determinants of primate community structure. In: Primate Communities, J. Fleagle , C. Janson and K. Reed (eds.), pp. 237–267. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press.

10 

A. Leopold 1933. Game management. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

11 

C. A. Peres and E. Palacios 2007. Basin-wide effects of game harvest on vertebrate population densities in Amazonian forests: implications for animal-mediated seed dispersal. Biotropica 39 (3): 304–315.

12 

O. Y. Pinzón 1998. Manejo Silvicultural de vivero, plantación y bosque natural en predios de La Reforestadota Bosques del Futuro S.A. ubicados en los municipios de Puerto Boyacá y Cimitarra (Santander). Undergraduate Thesis. Universidad Distrital de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

13 

P. R. Stevenson , M. J. Quiñones and J. A. Ahumada 1998. Effects of fruit patch availability on feeding subgroup size and spacing patterns in four primate species, at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Int. J. Primatol. 19(2): 313–324.

14 

P. R. Stevenson 2001. The relationship between fruit production and primate abundance in Neotropical communities. Biol. J. Linnean. Soc. 71: 161–178.

15 

P. R. Stevenson 2004. Patrones fenológicos de vegetación leñosa en el Parque Tinigua, Colombia: comparaciones metodológicas con énfasis en la producción de frutos. Caldasia 26(1): 125–150.

16 

P. R. Stevenson and M. J. Quiñones 2004. Sampling methods used to quantify activity patterns and diet: A comparative example using woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha). Field Studies of Fauna and Flora La Macarena, Colombia 14: 21–28.

Ana María Aldana, Marta Beltrán, Johanna Torres-Neira, and Pablo R. Stevenson "Habitat Characterization and Population Density of Brown Spider Monkeys (Ateles hybridus) in Magdalena Valley, Colombia," Neotropical Primates 15(2), 46-50, (1 August 2008). https://doi.org/10.1896/044.015.0203
Published: 1 August 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top