We measured use rates, nest success, and inter- and intra- specific nest parasitism by ducks using tree cavities and nest boxes in an old-growth forested floodplain at Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge in Swanton, VT. Our study represents a previously under-explored opportunity to evaluate various breeding-season characteristics for ducks using both natural and artificial nest cavities in the same forested stand in the northeastern US. Overall use (72.5% vs. 14.5%) and nest-success rates (48.3% vs. 0.0%) were greater in artificial nest boxes but so was nest parasitism (62.1% vs. 0.0%). In addition, Aix sponsa (Wood Duck) were the only species using artificial nest boxes consistently even though this region represents a rare location in North America where they coexist with Lophodytes cucullatus (Hooded Merganser) and Bucephala clangula (Common Goldeneye), which are also cavity-nesting obligates. We found many (n = 35) unused available tree cavities over 2 years, and thus it is unlikely nest site availability is a limiting factor for population growth of cavity nesting ducks at Missisquoi NWR. Future research efforts should try to determine the factors affecting nest-cavity selection.
How to translate text using browser tools
3 March 2020
Use of Tree Cavities and Nest Boxes by Wood Ducks at Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge
J. Boomer Malanchuk,
Jacob N. Straub
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
Northeastern Naturalist
Vol. 27 • No. 1
March 2020
Vol. 27 • No. 1
March 2020