Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2003 Influence of Habitat on the Foraging Behaviour of the Mediterranean Horseshoe Bat, Rhinolophus euryale
Urtzi Goiti, Jose R. Aihartza, Inazio Garin, Javier Zabala
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In a previous study on habitat use by Rhinolophus euryale in an Atlantic area (Northern Iberian Peninsula), this bat species foraged exclusively in woodland, including both native deciduous woodland and exotic plantations. As the study was carried out in a landscape that was profoundly altered by industrial forestry, we predicted that in a better preserved landscape this species would select smaller feeding areas located at closer distances from the roost, according to the optimal foraging theory, and would use almost exclusively the preferred habitat, i.e., native deciduous woodland. To test these hypotheses, we radiotracked 14 R. euryale from the largest known breeding colony of northern Iberian Peninsula and determined their habitat selection, spatial foraging pattern, and hunting behaviour. Our predictions on habitat selection, as well as on the foraging site size and on commuting range were confirmed. Rhinolophus euryale used almost exclusively native deciduous woodland, and hedgerows were positively selected. We suggest that the richness of tree species in hedgerows provides a high prey availability sustained in time and space. Our findings show that habitat disturbance constitutes a major cause of decline for R. euryale in the study area.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

M. D. Adam , M. J. Lacki , and T. G. Barnes . 1994. Foraging areas and habitat use of the Virginia big-eared bat in Kentucky. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 58: 462–469. Google Scholar

2.

J. R. Aihartza 2001. Quirópteros de Araba, Bizkaia, y Gipuzkoa: distribución, ecología y conservatión. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Dynamics, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, 336 pp. Google Scholar

3.

J. R. Aihartza , I. Garin , U. Goiti , J. Zabala , and I. Zuberogoitia . 2003. Spring habitat selection by the Mediterranean horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus euryale) in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve (Basque Country). Mammalia, 67: 25–32. Google Scholar

4.

R. Arlettaz 1995. Myotis myotisMyotis blythii: ecology of the sibling mouse-eared bats. Horus Puplishers, Martigny, Switzerland, 208 pp. Google Scholar

5.

R. M. R. Barclay 1989. The effect of reproductive condition on the foraging behavior of female hoary bats, Lasiurus cinereus. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 24: 31–37. Google Scholar

6.

R. M. R. Barclay 1991. Population structure of temperate zone insectivorous bats in relation to foraging behaviour and energy demand. Journal of Animal Ecology, 60: 165–178. Google Scholar

7.

R. M. R. Barclay , B. J. Chruszcz , and M. Rhodes . 2000. Foraging behaviour of the large-footed myotis, Myotis moluccarum (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in south-eastern Queensland. Australian Journal of Zoology, 48: 385–392. Google Scholar

8.

F. Bontadina , T. Hotz , S. Gloor , A. Beck , M. Lutz , and E. Mühlethaler . 1995. Schutz von Jagdgebieten von Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Umsetzung der Ergebnisse einer Telemetrie-Studie in einem Alpental der Schweiz. Pp. 33–40, in Zur situation der Hufeisennasen in Europa ( Arbeitskreis Fledermäuse Sachsen-Anhalt, ed.). Arbeitskreis Fledermäuse Sachsen-Anhalt, Nebra, 182 pp. Google Scholar

9.

R Bontadina , H. Schofield , and B. Naef-Daenzer . 1999. Habitat preference in lesser horseshoe bats as revealed by radio-tracking. Abstracts of the VIIIth European Bat Research Symposium, 23–27 August, Kraków, Poland, p. 9. Google Scholar

10.

J. W. Bradbury, and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1976a. Social organisation and foraging in emballonurid bats. I. Field studies. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 1: 337–381. Google Scholar

11.

J. W. Bradbury, and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1976b. Social organisation and foraging in emballonurid bats. II A model for the determination of group size. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 1: 383–404. Google Scholar

12.

A. Brosset , L. Barbe , J.-C. Beaucournu , C. Faugier , H. Salvayre , and Y. Tupinier . 1988. La raréfaction du rhinolophe euryale (Rhinolophus euryale Blasius) en France. Recherche d'une explication. Mammalia, 52: 101–122. Google Scholar

13.

F. H. J. Crome , and G. C. Richards . 1988. Bats and gaps: microchiropteran community structure in a Queensland rain forest. Ecology, 69: 1960–1969. Google Scholar

14.

N. B. Davies , and A. I. Houston . 1984. Territory economics. Pp. 148–169, in Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach ( J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 493 pp. Google Scholar

15.

O. De Paz , and J. T. Alcalde . 2000. Catalogo national de especies amenazadas: propuestas. Barbastella, 1: 17–21. Google Scholar

16.

P. L. Duvergé , and G. Jones . 1994. Greater horseshoe bats -activity, foraging behaviour and habitat use. British Wildlife, 6: 69–72. Google Scholar

17.

G. V. D. Emde , and D. Menne . 1989. Discrimination of insect wingbeat-frequencies by the bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Journal of Comparative Physiology, Series A, 164: 663–671. Google Scholar

18.

G. V. D. Emde , and H.-U. Schnitzler . 1990. Classification of insects by echolocating greater horseshoe bats. Journal of Comparative Physiology, Series A, 167:423–430. Google Scholar

19.

A. C. Entwistle , P. A. Racey , and J. R. Speakman . 1996. Habitat exploitation by a gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351: 921–931. Google Scholar

20.

I. Horáček 1984. Remarks on the causality of population decline in European bats. Myotis, 21–22: 138–147. Google Scholar

21.

G. Jones , and M. Morton . 1992. Radio-tracking studies on habitat use by greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). Pp. 521–537, in Wildlife telemetry, remote monitoring and tracking of animals ( I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift, eds.). Ellis Horwood, London, 708 pp. Google Scholar

22.

G. Jones , and J. M. V. Rayner . 1989. Foraging behaviour and echolocation of wild horseshoe bats Rhinolophus ferrumequinum and R. hipposideros (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 25: 183–191. Google Scholar

23.

G. Jones , P. L. Duvergé , and R. Ransome . 1995. Conservation biology of an endangered species: field studies of greater horseshoe bats. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 67: 309–324. Google Scholar

24.

T. Kingston , G. Jones , A. Zubaid , and T. H. Kunz . 2000. Resource partitioning in rhinolophoid bats revisited. Oecologia, 124: 332–342. Google Scholar

25.

J. R. Krebs , and N. B. Davies . 1984. Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 493 pp. Google Scholar

26.

A. Lugon 1996. Ecologie du grand rhinolophe, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) en Valais (Suisse). Habitat, régime alimentaire et stratégie de chasse. Mém. Dipl., Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 116 pp. [not seen, cited in ROUÉ and BARATAUD, 1999]. Google Scholar

27.

F. J. Manly , L. McDonald , and D. L. Thomas . 1993. Resource selection by animals. Chapman & Hall, London, 177 pp. Google Scholar

28.

C. M. McAney , and J. S. Fairley . 1988. Habitat preference and overnight and seasonal variation in the foraging activity of lesser horseshoe bats. Acta Theriologica, 33: 393–402. Google Scholar

29.

G. Motte , and R. Libois . 2002. Conservation of the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus hipposideros Bechstein, 1800) (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Belgium. A case study of feeding habitat requirements. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 132: 49–54. Google Scholar

30.

G. Neuweiler 1989. Foraging ecology and audition in bats. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4: 160–166. Google Scholar

31.

G. Neuweiler , W. Metzner , U. Heilmann , R. Rübsamen , M. Eckrich , and H. H. Costa . 1987. Foraging behaviour and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus rouxi) of Sri Lanka. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 20: 53–67. Google Scholar

32.

U. M. Norberg , and J. M. V. Rayner . 1987. Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 316: 335–427. Google Scholar

33.

J. M. Palmeirim , and L. Rodrigues . 1992. Plano Nacional de Conservaçao dos Morcegos Cavernícolas. Estudos de Biología e Conservaçao da Natureza, 8: 1–165. Google Scholar

34.

C. R. Pavey 1998. Habitat use by the eastern horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus megaphyllus, in a fragmented woodland mosaic. Wildlife Research, 25: 489–498. Google Scholar

35.

P. A. Racey , and S. M. Swift . 1985. Feeding ecology of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during pregnancy and lactation. 1. Foraging behaviour. Animal Ecology, 54: 205–215. Google Scholar

36.

S. Roué , and M. Barataud . 1999. Habitats et activité de chasse des chiroptères menacés en Europe: synthèse des connaissances actuelles en vue d'une gestion conservatrice. Le Rhinolophe, Special Volume 2, 136 pp. Google Scholar

37.

D. Russo , G. Jones , and A. Migliozzi . 2002. Habitat selection by the Mediterranean horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus euryale (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in a rural area of southern Italy and implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 107:71–81. Google Scholar

38.

H.-U. Schnitzler , and E. K. V. Kalko . 1998. How echolocating bats search and find food. Pp. 183–196, in Bat biology and conservation ( T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 365 pp. Google Scholar

39.

H.-U. Schnitzler , H. Hackbart , U. Heilmann , and H. Herbert . 1985. Echolocation behaviour of rufous horseshoe bats hunting for insects in the flycatcher style. Journal of Comparative Physiology, Series A, 157: 39–46. Google Scholar

40.

H. W. Schofield 1996. The ecology and conservation biology of Rhinolophus hipposideros, the lesser horseshoe bat. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, 198 pp. Google Scholar

41.

C. B. Shiel , R. E. Shiel , and J. S. Fairley . 1999. Seasonal changes in the foraging behaviour of Leisler's bats (Nyctalus leisleri) in Ireland as revealed by radio-telemetry. Journal of Zoology, 249: 347–358. Google Scholar

42.

R. E. Stebbings 1988. Conservation of European bats. Christopher Helm, London, 246 pp. Google Scholar

43.

R. E. Stebbings , and F. Griffith . 1986. Distribution and status of bats in Europe. Monks Wood Experimental Station, Huntingdon, 142 pp. Google Scholar

44.

D. W. Stephens , and J. R. Krebs . 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 243 pp. Google Scholar

45.

M. D. Tuttle 1974. An improved trap for bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 55: 475–477. Google Scholar

46.

G. C. White , and R. A. Garrot . 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, London, 383 pp. Google Scholar
© Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS
Urtzi Goiti, Jose R. Aihartza, Inazio Garin, and Javier Zabala "Influence of Habitat on the Foraging Behaviour of the Mediterranean Horseshoe Bat, Rhinolophus euryale," Acta Chiropterologica 5(1), 75-84, (1 June 2003). https://doi.org/10.3161/001.005.0106
Received: 2 October 2002; Accepted: 1 December 2002; Published: 1 June 2003
Back to Top